MP3000 available
We are finally disposing of our MP3000. It still powers on and Warp runs OK but a disk error prevents initailization. To complywith licensing restrictions and internal confidentiality, we will pull the disks and destroy them. It is located in Ottawa, Ontraio, Canada. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Reading a scratch tape)
>Rex wrote: >Actually, it does make sense (at least to me) to have this threshold set. >We've gone back more than once to rescue a developer or support person who >inadvertently >scratched a tape the day before and we were able to recover it >for them by using this "expired but not really" feature. It is really no >different from old physical tapes, >where the data on a scratch tape wasn't >really gone until the tape was physically written over. In those days, one >could jump through hoops (and security) to get the >contents brought back. >This simply maintains that capability. Without the expire hold, as soon as >the tape is scratch, the data is gone. Back in the 70s, payroll was run in-house at the place I worked. Every 2 weeks the head of payroll would bring in a removable disk pack and stay in the computer room until the checks and reports were printed and then took everything back with him. There was a back up to reel tape. A tape label with the dataset name was printed and stuck on the reel as it was removed from the drive and stored in the computer room until expiration. The operators knew these tapes would only be used by payroll. Each tape had its serial number prominently displayed on its perimeter case. When a tape expired, the tape label was removed and it was hung on a scratch rack. A co-worker waited until the payroll backup tape expired and ran a utility to print the contents, calling for the expired tape by serial number with BLP. In order to minimize his chances of detection by nosy operators, who would stop the printer and adjust the paper feed behind the printer if they thought something interesting was being printed, he printed it in hex. I got involved because he couldn't read hex. So, taking this as an educational opportunity, I showed him how to use the green card to interpret the name field and find packed decimal fields using my record as an example. He left for greener pastures soon after. F Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Definition of mainframe? Was: Ars Technica
>> Wayne B wrote: COBOL MOVE was not intuitive. Should have been PROPOGATE or COPY, COPY was already taken I guess. Assembler has the same problem: MVC, MVCL, etc. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Effective region
This sort of control block chasing can usually be done in COBOL, if that helps. Radoslaw wrote: W dniu 24.05.2023 o 03:26, Phil Smith III pisze: > Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: >> Scenario: >> Default REGION >> REGION specified explicitely in JOB card (or in another similar way) >> SMFLIMxx and/or IEFUSI. >> Q: how to check effective REGION limit for the job/stc? > Does this help? > L R7,PSAAOLD-PSAaddress of ASCB > USING ASCB,R7 > L R7,ASCBLDA > USING LDA,R7 > L R2,ABOVESZ > MVC 0(4,R2),LDAELIM size of region above the line > L R2,ABOVEAL > MVC 0(4,R2),LDAELOAL size of region above the line > L R2,BELOWSZ > MVC 0(4,R2),LDALIMIT size of region below the line > L R2,BELOWAL > MVC 0(4,R2),LDALOALsize of region below the line > L R2,REGSZ > MVC 0(4,R2),LDAREGRQ actual region size > Unfortunately no, however I appreciate your effort. Thank you! No, because I'm assembler (almost) illiterate. No, because as far as I understand it is good to find out current values "from inside" of the task. However I reviewed SMF30 data and I think this is the direction I should follow. That means some report I have to create. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Subject: Re: Currency format suggestions, please?
This is been very interesting, but no one has mentioned billions and trillions. When I was a young, I learned that the UK million was the same as US, but billion was a million millions (not just a thousand million) and a trillion was a million billions and so on. i guess It makes a difference when you're talking about national debt (cue Senator Everett Dirksen). Anyway, UK switched to the thousands- based 'illions in 1974. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Transmitting SMF records
I'm glad there was a solution. But the underlying problem seems to be that z/OS FTP appears to be limited to processing a binary (image) transfer as a stream of bytes unless the transfer is between a z/OS client and z/OS server. IBM RECFM of VB and VBS seem to be quite well defined and I don't know why, if the receiving z/OS FTP is informed that the data stream is actually VB(S) format, either by SITE/LOCSITE FTP commands or by the DCB of a preallocated output dataset, it can't invoke the same routines that it would if the sender was a z/OS system. As an alternative, it wouldn't seem very difficult to create a utility to read the FTPed data (received as a sequential file with an arbitrary record length) and reformat the data to write a VB(S) file. I've known of windows-based utilities that process FTPed SMF data (raw or tersed) so the technical knowledge is out there. Date:Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:22:27 -0600 From:Boesel Guillaume Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Transmitting SMF records Hi Rex, Great. You are right, tersing file from tape to tape works well. It took around 80-90 MSU during an hour for just one file but it worked. Hoping that Ituriel will be able to read this file. Regards and thanks ! Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Assembler courses
To help a person who has COBOL and C language experience learn to write assembler, I would like them to learn from the start both reentrant and baseless coding techniques. Is there training available that assumes the instruction set available on the z12 is the starting point and that teaches reentrancy as the norm? (Cross-posted to IBM-Main and Assembler-list) Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z16 video
It was a great video, I agree, especially if you could watch it without closed captioning. My experience with closed captioning in contrast to proper subtitling has led me to believe that most (all?) closed captioning is done by voice recognition software coupled with simultaneous interpretation software without human review or editing. I think it's true for some movies too, because I'm sure it's a lot cheaper than paying a person with the skills and knowledge to translate the original script or the sound track. When it's really bad, it's not only distracting, it can ruin the experience. In contrast, well-done movie subtitling while listening to the foreign language soundtrack can be an excellent experience. I feel it's still an area where the current technology is quite limited (albeit significantly faster and cheaper) compared to human capabilities. I wonder if it's possible for a video creator to edit the closed-captions for a particular language to correct errors? Gary Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
3270 emulator for Mac
Is there a good 3270 emulator for an Mac laptop? We're looking at Mocha but it appears to have limited functionality. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Abend S052-104
Rob Scott wrote (snipped): From the description of the abend, if your user code runs as a jobstep in something like a JES initiator, you will always be at risk from a prior batch job performing an LXRES for PC-ss (without an initiator restart). ... Is there any reason why your user-ASID owned PC-cp cannot be owned by your server-ASID ? The load module would have to be in LPA/common but could probably execute exactly the same code as it does today. and Peter Relson wrote (snipped): One case would be a multi-step started task (or initiated job) where the first step did so, and there is a second step. Don't do that. Thanks, Peter and Rob. This was a batch job and we do not know all the preceding job steps (we only know the prior step was IDCAMS). We know our product can be run in multiple steps in the same job. Your responses will enable us to help the customer research the preceding steps to the abend in the address space. The resolution may be as simple as changing the job class for this job (or the cross-memory job step). According to the customer, this happens once in a while and rerunning the job works. It was set up this way when we decided we had to add a PC to our product 20 years ago. I believe the programmer was afraid that a customer could accidentally cancel the server started task and cause all running instances of our product to abend (which could include CICS and IMS/TM regions, batch jobs and a shared dataspace). He figured this technique would only prevent new instances of our product from starting and wouldn't be as big a problem for the customer to recover from. Gary Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Abend S052-104
We have a situation in a customer environment where they intermittently get this abend when our product initializes in a jobstep. The S052 abend explanation: A program incorrectly issued a macro to request processing by Program Call/authorization (PC/AUTH) service routines. Register 15 contains a hexadecimal reason code in the form xxyy, where x identifies the macro that was issued, and yy identifies the error. See the system programmer response for an explanation of these reason codes. *Code** Explanation* 01yy The program issued an LXRES macro. 0104 A job step attempted to issue the LXRES macro, but a prior job step owned space-switch entry tables. (Subsequent job steps are not permitted to issue PC/AUTH macros.) Before applications using our product are started, our product initializes an non-terminating address space in which we set up a system non-space-switching PC. This PC is executed when our product is initialized in a job step. The function of the PC is to create a non-space-switching non-system PC in our address-space with our "user" PC for several supervisor state routines we need to invoke. We also set up an MVS RESMGR exit to allow us to cleanup at termination (which includes an LXFRE). So there is no doubt that we executed an LXRES. But to me this abend indicates that some prior step (could it perhaps not even be in this job, but in some job that previously ran in this address space?) created a space-switching PC and the address space is still is supporting it and will not allow another LXRES. So to prevent this error from occurring, is there something we can do in our code, or should the submitter of the job ensure that it runs in a different address space or should whatever created the space-switching PC clean it up? Or do I entirely misunderstand the meaning of this abend code? Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
MVS RESMGR exit
Excuse me for asking this question here, but I can't find an IMS DC list. We rely on getting control at task termination to clean up resources used by our software. We create a PC to add an MVS RESMGR exit when our software is first accessed in an IMS MPR. If there is a pseudo-abend, which we understand means the TCB on which transactions run will terminate, we expect our RESMGR exit to execute. The IMS MPR control program will then attach a new TCB in the region on which to run transactions. Our software will be reinitialized if a transaction accesses it. This could happen many times. However, if our RESMGR exit doesn't execute, we may deplete resources. Is it possible that the IMS MPR control program bypasses or deletes our RESMGR exit on some pseudo-abends? Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Friday!
I almost remember how to do it on an IBM 1620 and had to do it on an Amdahl 470 V6 (in two steps). But it was a machine language routine, but you seem to be referring to perhaps a buit-in function of the hardware. Gary BobL wrote: > Hi All, > > Who remembers how to "ripple core" on a 360/75J? Back in the day, I > was taught that it "wrote un-digit zeros" to all storage locations (main + > LCS) on the box. If course, an IPL was required after this was done. > > Not sure how widely it was used. A simple yes or no is OK if you > cannot provide details. > > Thanks! > BobL Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: RESMGR exit vs. end of task
Thanks, Jim, We suspected that must be the explanation, but I wanted reassurance that we hadn't missed something. I appreciated the other comments, too. I now understand why my searches for a variety of keywords involving RESMGR, CLOSE, DCB, etc., showed many results, some of which were interesting, others not so, but none that help explain the changed behaviour. Gary On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 17:28, Jim Mulder <mailto:d10j...@us.ibm.com> wrote: This is an intentional change in APAR OA55657. You should see the same results on z/OS 2.1 with PTF UA97322. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone: +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com<mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dkl_logo.png]<http://www.dkl.com/> Visit us online at www.DKL.com<http://www.dkl.com/> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/banner.png]<http://www.dkl.com/mailsig> E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
RESMGR exit vs. end of task
Our product is called as a subroutine of the user's program (usually COBOL). Most of our code is user key, but on the first call for a task we issue a PC to set a RESMGR exit. This exit allows us to freemain our control blocks and close any datasets we may have opened whether the task abends or not. Recently we observed that when a task abends, the DCBs/ACBs are already closed when we get control in the RESMGR exit. We know this was not true under z/OS 2.1, but has occurred on our z/OS 2.3 system and at a customer site recently. This has no significant consequences because all we do is issue a message. But I have not been able to find any documentation which would have allowed us to anticipate this behavioural change. So I thought I'd ask you all if you'd observed this or know what changed.. Gary Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Charles B. Wang, former Islanders owner dies, his attorney says | Newsday
I trialed and then chose CA-Sort over IBM's Sort and SyncSort around 1977 or so as a fledgling OS/VS1 Sysprog. As I recall, we needed to upgrade from IBM's free sort because it didn't support 3350 DASD. Gary Weinhold Wayne Driscoll wrote: CA-Sort was a CA product well before the Pansophic acquisition. Pansophic wasn't acquired until 1991, while CA-Sort was available in the late 70's or early 80's at the latest. Wayne Driscoll Rocket Software Note - All opinions are strictly my own. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/OS Assembler programmer job opportunity
Our management would like to add another z/OS programmer to our team. This is a full-time position or contract that will include maintaining, enhancing, modernizing (if that's a word), debugging, testing, and designing z/OS product(s) and supporting customers (both in production and evaluation). The individual would collaborate with a small team mostly located in eastern Canada. Only responses sent to my company email (below) will be answered. Cross-posted to IBM Mainframe Assembler list Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: APF authorization and AC(00)
It could be practical when writing high-performance code to modify a RENT module if it is not in key 0 (or use a PC to make the modification if in key 0). An example would be if an extensive chain of indirect pointers (or the NAME/TOKEN service), is used to locate life of IPL memory allocated for an application. If a location in the RENT module is zero, it locates the memory and stores the address (using CS) in the RENT module; if it's non-zero, it uses the value as the address. If CS fails, check for zero again. Since all executions would store the same value, no other serialization is needed. I'm not sure CS is needed if it's a fullword on a word boundary. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone: +1.613.523.5500 x216<tel:+1.613.523.5500%20x216> Email: weinh...@dkl.com<mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dkl_logo.png]<http://www.dkl.com/> Visit us online at www.DKL.com<http://www.dkl.com/> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/banner.png]<http://www.dkl.com/mailsig> E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. __ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: S0D5 accessing dataspace
Thanks to those who responded; here's an update on this abend: Although it's possible, I doubt we have a bug in our logic in this area; this has run for more than 10 years at multiple sites on multiple levels of z/OS. And we do not ever issue a TRANSWAP OKSWAP; the dataspace is designed to be accessible until the job ends. Rob Scott's suggestion that moving The SYSEVENT TRANSWAP before the DSPSERV CREATE is worth trying especially if we can find a way to reproduce the abend. If the abend recurs at this site (or anywhere else), I will surely get the output of a D J and an SVCDUMP. Since no one suggested it, I guess it is not likely that the site would have a monitor or exit that would change a non-swappable address space to swappable. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone: +1.613.523.5500 x216<tel:+1.613.523.5500%20x216> Email: weinh...@dkl.com<mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dkl_logo.png]<http://www.dkl.com/> Visit us online at www.DKL.com<http://www.dkl.com/> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/banner.png]<http://www.dkl.com/mailsig> E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: S0D5 accessing dataspace
Date:Mon, 1 May 2017 23:16:43 +0300 From:Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com><mailto:bdis...@dissensoftware.com> Subject: Re: S0D5 accessing dataspace What is the reason code? On Mon, 1 May 2017 14:59:54 -0400 Gary Weinhold <weinh...@dkl.com><mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> wrote: :>We're experiencing an abend S0D5 that occurs at only one site. We have an authorized program that issues a DSPSERV CREATE SCOPE=ALL to establish a dataspace. It initializes several of the blocks in the dataspace but does not touch the rest of the blocks. It then issues SYSEVENT TRANSWAP and WAITs for the ECB to be posted (unless it was already non-swappable). Then it publishes the availability of the dataspace in CSA and WAITs for a MVS STOP command. S0D5 reason code: 4F000510 -- Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone: +1.613.523.5500 x216<tel:+1.613.523.5500%20x216> Email: weinh...@dkl.com<mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dkl_logo.png]<http://www.dkl.com/> Visit us online at www.DKL.com<http://www.dkl.com/> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/banner.png]<http://www.dkl.com/mailsig> E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. __ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
S0D5 accessing dataspace
We're experiencing an abend S0D5 that occurs at only one site. We have an authorized program that issues a DSPSERV CREATE SCOPE=ALL to establish a dataspace. It initializes several of the blocks in the dataspace but does not touch the rest of the blocks. It then issues SYSEVENT TRANSWAP and WAITs for the ECB to be posted (unless it was already non-swappable). Then it publishes the availability of the dataspace in CSA and WAITs for a MVS STOP command. Later we run a problem state program that invokes a proprietary PC to acquire the dataspace ALET (ALESERV) and then accesses the dataspace blocks. It runs fine until it tries to access a block that was not referenced by the dataspace creating program. It then abends S0D5. Are there conditions under which a non-swappable address space can become logically swapped out? Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone: +1.613.523.5500 x216<tel:+1.613.523.5500%20x216> Email: weinh...@dkl.com<mailto:weinh...@dkl.com> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dkl_logo.png]<http://www.dkl.com/> Visit us online at www.DKL.com<http://www.dkl.com/> [http://www.dkl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/banner.png]<http://www.dkl.com/mailsig> E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 5 Dec 2015 to 6 Dec 2015 (#2015-340)
My apologies for sending the digest; a problem particularly for users like me who receive the digest. I can only guess that I either fatfingered my smart phone or drifted off holding the mouse while reading it. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. __ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Dec 2015 to 5 Dec 2015 (#2015-339)
--- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Date:Sat, 5 Dec 2015 18:43:20 -0500 From:"Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> Subject: Re: length of "executable" In <201512051447.tb5eldfi004...@d01av05.pok.ibm.com>, on 12/05/2015 at 09:49 AM, Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> said: >You did not explain why you might "need" 36B0 hex. He's loading a table and needs both the address and length in order to process it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Date:Sun, 6 Dec 2015 07:20:48 +0530 From:Jake Anderson <justmainfra...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: TCPIP Configuration Help I believe If both the OSA are initialised and started then they are good. The routing will take from first order of your Routing statement. Second OSA would act as a redundant. You can post your query in TCP-L where you can get more response On Sunday 6 December 2015, Sonny Gupta <sgu...@maintec.com> wrote: > Hello, I have a small z9 System with two OSA Card. I am able connect to > only the one of the OSA Card without any problems and unable to determine > what I need to do in order to connect both of the OSA Cards at the same > time. Each OSA Card is connected to separate --> Switch ---> Firewall --> > ISP Modem. I am able to connect to both of the cards via ICC without any > issues. Below are the statements that I am using: > > DEVICE OSAB1 MPCIPA SECROUTER AUTORESTART > LINKOSAB1L IPAQENET OSAB1 > HOME 192.168.168.164 OSAB1L > ; > DEVICE OSAB2 MPCIPA SECROUTER AUTORESTART > LINKOSAB2L IPAQENET OSAB2 > HOME 192.168.169.68 OSAB2L > ; > BEGINRoutes > ROUTE DEFAULT 192.168.168.168 OSAB1LMTU 1492 > ROUTE DEFAULT 192.168.169.168 OSAB2LMTU 1492 > ENDRoutes > > What I have been able to determine is that 2nd Route Default statement is > being ignored. I am able to get to 2nd OSA Card if I move the 2nd Route > Statement in front of the 1st one and then of course, I am unable to get to > the first one. I am not an expert is TCPIP and I have spend considerable > amount of time reviewing the manuals along with searching the net. I will > be glad to provide any required information and thanks in advance for any > recommendations. > > Regards, > Sonny > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Date:Sat, 5 Dec 2015 23:02:31 -0400 From:Clark Morris <cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Lrecl On 28 Nov 2015 11:50:44 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >All: > >Our STC use several files and I want to verify that the files have the >correct logical record length. The STCs are written LE Cobol. >I would like to know before I open the file if the file that is created or >allocated is correct in record length. For example, if the Logical Record >Length is 121 as defined in the program tries to open a file with a LRECL >300 bytes. Can i do the following ? It is simple. Assign a status code (2 bytes) to any file you want to check and then check the status code after ALL I-O operations for the file. The status codes and their meanings are in the COBOL manual. Status codes 00 and 97 are the only codes I normally accept on open. One of the status codes returned on open is for wrong length record. The presence of a status code on the SELECT statement for a file means that the default error handling is bypassed. CLark Morris > >1. Call a Assembler subroutine using RDJFCB and determine the lrecl on the >volume for the dataset and allocation ? >2. If the lrecl i want to pass back a RTNCD in R15 and then then have Cobol >fail > > >Regards, >Scott > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- End of IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Dec 2015 to 5 Dec 2015 (#2015-339) * Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Aug 2015 to 11 Aug 2015 (#2015-223)
And if I were Emperor of the universe, I'd adjust the earth's orbit to make sure it competed a revolution in exactly 365 days. gary On 2015-08-12 00:00, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:19:38 -0500 From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com Subject: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program) On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:37:30 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote: Encyclopedia Britannica is complicit in the confusion to this day by incorrectly implying in their Leap Year entry that in addition to the divisible by 4, 100, 400 rules there either is or should be a 4000-year exception rule: ...For still more precise reckoning, every year evenly divisible by 4,000 (i.e., 16,000, 24,000, etc.) may be a common (not leap) year, Over 18 years ago (Nov 1996) EB acknowledged that no such rule exists: it was an un-adopted and sub-optimal suggestion by Sir John Herschel around 1820. EB has apparently not yet followed their own internal recommendation in 1996 to reword this statement in the future. If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule: Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year. 365 31/128 is within one second of the mean tropical year; closer even than the 4000-year rule. The unpredictable secular increase in the length of the day makes a 4000-year rule pointless. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OT STCK question
From conversations with a child who prefers not to be identified by gender and who also studied lingustics, I suspect that just as all the rules I learned about when to use me and I seem to be ignored when and is used (John and me will be using the tickets given to Nancy and I) that they, them, their(s) will soon be treated as the singular forms for persons. It won't be a rule; as they say, to each their own. Gary Weinhold On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:03:01 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: The problem is that there is no gender neutral/un-specified singular. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Overlaid VCON in load module
Thanks for all responses. Sam Siegal asked: 1) Does this only happen on second and subsequent load? Since it loads correctly all the time except for rare situations in a multitasking environment, we are assuming it is related to a second load running concurrently with the first load. 2) What attributes (rent, reus, etc.) are present on the load module? Refr, rent and reus 3) is this under CICS? Or a proprietary multitasking region? This is under a WLM-managed DB2 Stored Procedure Address Space (SPAS). 4) Is code all ASM? Or is there an HLL in the mix? All assembler, although the caller is probably HLL. 5) was the module recently changed? or is it a new module? The LOAD technique was changed, along with several other things to address more general problems in this environment. We formerly did a standard LOAD, but then the loaded module disappeared if the TCB which loaded it was detached. So we now enter sup state via a PC, and acquire subpool 131 memory in which to do the load, so it outlasts the TCB. We also made other changes at the same time. Abe Kornelis wrote: In one of my first programs, I inadvertently defined a Vcon double. It gave me exactly the result you describe. It led me to conclude that the loader simply adds the offset to the base value. If you define (or load) twice, the addition is performed twice as well... Looks like you will need a lock or latch of some kind after all. Or pre-load, maybe. I'm sure you'll be able to determine what will work best for your product. We're quite sure we don't double define the VCON, since the LOAD normally works perfectly Greg Dyck said: Normal (non-directed) LOAD processing serializes fetch processing for a module and only performs relocation of ACONs/VCONs once when the module is fetched. The only way I could see what you describe happen is if there were two RLD entries for the same VCON and it would happen with one load or 20. Thanks for this reassurance. That's what i understood and why I thought this was unusual behaviour. For directed LOAD processing serialization is the issuers responsibility. If two tasks concurrently did a directed load of the same load module to the same storage address (why they would, I do not know) this could possibly happen... though it would be random as to which ACONs/VCONs were messed up. Thanks for this. I did not know that directed load was not serialized. I'm not sure why we would be loading to the same memory, since the getmain precedes the load, but we will shift our research. This also makes us more confident that serializing the directed load will address the problem, rather than mask it. Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics, Ltd. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Overlaid VCON in load module
We have a situation where it appears that a LOAD of a module may not be resolving a VCON correctly. The first requirement for this module in a region will cause us to issue a LOAD for the module. In a multitasking environment we know that our code could be running on two TCBs simultaneously, but I don't see anything in the manuals to indicate that we have to prevent LOAD from running at the same time. From what we can see the address that ends up in the VCON is the displacement from the beginning of the module (the value presumably placed their by the binder) plus twice the load point. Has anyone seen this happen before? Is there an undocumented requirement to single thread multiple LOADs for the same module within a region? Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics, Ltd. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
Thanks for the responses, Skip and Lizette, I probably wasn't clear that I did issue SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLE=SYS2.DKLOMVS.CDS03,TYPE=OMVS and received IXC388I SETXCF COUPLE,ACOUPLE REQUIRES TYPE OMVS TO BE ACTIVE ON THIS SYSTEM and similarly for TYPE=XCF. I suspect it's something to do with the Basicness of the sysplex (no coupling facility), so I guess updating the COUPLExx PARMLIB members and reIPLing is the only way to go. Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics, Ltd. From:Skip Robinsonjo.skip.robin...@sce.com (snipped) In any case, as long as TYPE= is correct for the couple data set(s) you're manipulating, you should have no problem. From: Lizette Koehlerstars...@mindspring.com (snipped) I think the same process you used for the CFRM and LOGR can be used for the others. each one is a TYPE in the environment. I would check the manual, but I think you can create new files and switch them like the CFRM. Or you create new files, update parmlib and IPL. -Original Message- From: Gary Weinholdweinh...@dkl.com (snipped) I am trying to clean up a volume with several alternate couple datasets on it. For CFRM and LOGR, I just used IXCL1DSU to allocate alternates and SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLEd to them and that freed up the datasets so I could delete them. But the XCF and OMVS CDSes are a problem. I can't delete them because they're in use by XCFAS (shared enq). SETXCF won't do anything because IXC388I SETXCF COUPLE,ACOUPLE requires type OMVS to active on this system and the same message for XCF. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
I am trying to clean up a volume with several alternate couple datasets on it. For CFRM and LOGR, I just used IXCL1DSU to allocate alternates and SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLEd to them and that freed up the datasets so I could delete them. But the XCF and OMVS CDSes are a problem. I can't delete them because they're in use by XCFAS (shared enq). SETXCF won't do anything because IXC388I SETXCF COUPLE,ACOUPLE requires type OMVS to active on this system and the same message for XCF. That may be because we come up as a basic sysplex, but don't bring the other lpar up. Do I have any alternatives? Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics, Ltd. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re :z/OS subroutine in assembler, used in both batch CICS , making re-entrant
But it unfortunately doesn't work if you are using EXCI. With EXCI, you will have a CICS AFCB in batch and IMS/TM environments. Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics On 6/28/2013 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote: This has worked for me in the past: DFHAFCD TYPE=LOCATE ADDRESS AFCB LTR R15,R15 Are we BATCH? BZ BATCH00 YES Do Batch CLC 0(3,R15),=CL3'AFC' Is It CICS? BE CICS00 Yes, Do CICS -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
formatting control blocks
I'm looking for a public domain control block formatting tool that will display memory formatted with the information from a non-IBM assembler DSECT. I realize that there are a couple of CBT files that probably include this capability, but I'd appreciate any experiences regarding ease of use or limitations before investing too much time. Gary Weinhold -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Passing of Chris Mason reported
Shmuel wrote: De mortui I appreciated the reference to the Latin phrase ( which is easily searched to a Wikipedia article) and discovered that it was an appropriate response to the quoted email on the subject.. Subsequent responses seemed OT (including this one). And but for the spelling, i would not have discovered the Finnish band Tarot's song De Mortui Nil Nisi Bene. Gary Weinhold Data Kinetics, Ltd. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
