Re: Retrieving a VM Packed file

2009-09-08 Thread Schuh, Richard
Also SPOOLCHN

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 1:38 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: Retrieving a VM Packed file
 
 and SHOW...
 
 Adam Thornton wrote:
  
  On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:35 PM, David Boyes wrote:
  
  I think my list of must-haves would be:
   
  VMARC
  the PIPE-friendly DDR
  TRACK
  plastic pipes
  XCOL
  
  
  CHARLOTT
  
  *I* really like CUA2001, but, uh, that's just my perversity.
  
  Adam
 
 --
 Dave Jones
 V/Soft
 www.vsoft-software.com
 Houston, TX
 281.578.7544
 

Re: RELABEL SYSRES was: Re: Backup RES Labeling Question

2009-09-08 Thread Schuh, Richard
If you override the console device on the SAPL screen at IPL time, it 
overrides, as in negates, the lists in the SYSTEM CONFIG, both 
Operator_Consoles and Emergency_Operator_Consoles. AFAIR, this is true whether 
you have the CONS= parameter in the default or override SAPL parameters. If you 
want the config file lists to remain active, you cannot use the SAPL to specify 
the console address. At least, that is how it works in 5.3. 

I hope that either 5.4 or the looming 6.1 corrects this design flaw. The one 
specified should, IMHO, be inserted at the head of the lists, rather than 
replacing them. The treatment of the IPL pack is a good example - it is 
inserted as the first CP_Owned volume if it is not in the list. 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz
 Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 11:21 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: RELABEL SYSRES was: Re: Backup RES Labeling Question
 
 Good work Mike!
 A few comments after a brief scan of your document are embedded below:
 
 
6) When the STAND ALONE PROGRAM LOADER: screen
appears, under the
  line IPL PARAMETERS enter:  
 
   cons=console_vdev
 
 
  E.g. cons=0009
 
 
  Then press F10 to IPL with that virtual console
address used as your
  OPERATOR console.
   
 
7) If you receive a Wait State 1010, it means that
the SYSTEM CONFIG
  file does not have the console_vdev you entered
listed as one of the
  Operator_Consoles.  Change the console virtual
address to match one
  of those specified in SYSTEM CONFIG.  
 
  Nota bene: The SYSTEM CONFIG distributed by IBM
for z/VM 5.4.0 had:  
 
  Operator_Consoles 0020 0021 0022 0023 0E20
0E21 1020 ,  
System_3270 System_Console  
 
 AFAIR - the SAPL option CONS= acts as if the address 
 was added to that list. The reason for a 1010 would be
 forgetting the conmode 3270.
 


NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Bohnsack
I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and 
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to 
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the 
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no 
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4 
at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.


Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and 
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?


Jim

--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Gimblet, Tom
I do not have NUCXDROP module on my 902 system either.

 Thanks
Thomas Gimblet
347 643 3194
 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: NUCXDROP

I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and 
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to 
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the 
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no 
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4

at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and 
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

-- 
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Marcy Cortes
Don't have one on either a 902 system or a 901 system.
No longer have any 801 systems to check.
The command still works though.


Marcy 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you 
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must 
not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] NUCXDROP

I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and 
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to 
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the 
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no 
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4 
at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and 
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

-- 
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Suleiman Shahin

No NUCXDROP on my 0902 either. 

Suleiman Shahin





 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:51:18 -0400
 From: jab...@cornell.edu
 Subject: NUCXDROP
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


_
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on 
Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009

Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
VM64522 moved NUCXDROP into the nucleus.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: NUCXDROP

I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and 
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to 
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the 
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no 
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4

at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and 
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

-- 
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Bohnsack




I guess I'd better place a call to IBM.
Jim

Suleiman Shahin wrote:

  --_915342f8-cdbd-42c9-a5c9-d7e2b8ad5d38_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


No NUCXDROP on my 0902 either.=20

Suleiman Shahin





  
  
Date: Tue=2C 8 Sep 2009 12:51:18 -0400
From: jab...@cornell.edu
Subject: NUCXDROP
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU


  
  
_
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you=92re up to on=
 Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=3DPID23285::T:WLMTAGL=
:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009=

--_915342f8-cdbd-42c9-a5c9-d7e2b8ad5d38_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

html
head
style
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Verdana
}
/style
/head
body class=3D'hmmessage'
No NUCXDROP on my 0902 either. brbrSuleiman Shahin

brbrbrbrgt=3B Date: Tue=2C 8 Sep 2009 12:51:18 -0400brgt=3B Fro=
m: jab...@cornell.edubrgt=3B Subject: NUCXDROPbrgt=3B To: ib...@lists=
ERV.UARK.EDUbrgt=3Bbrbr /hr /Windows Live: Make it easier for your=
 friends to see what you=92re up to on Facebook. a href="" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://windowsl=">http://windowsl=
ive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=3DPID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI=
_SB_facebook:082009' target=3D'_new'Find out more./a/body
/html=

--_915342f8-cdbd-42c9-a5c9-d7e2b8ad5d38_--

  


-- 
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu




Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Bruce Hayden
The NUCXDROP command moved into the CMS nucleus.  So, the command is
still there, but you won't find a NUCXDROP MODULE.

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jim Bohnsackjab...@cornell.edu wrote:
 I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and then
 move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to move CMS, I
 compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the lpars.  On the
 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's
 on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4 at the level it was
 installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

 Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and see
 if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

 Jim

 --
 Jim Bohnsack
 Cornell University
 (972) 596-6377 home/office
 (972) 342-5823 cell
 jab...@cornell.edu




-- 
Bruce Hayden
Linux on System z Advanced Technical Support
IBM, Endicott, NY


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Bohnsack
Thank you and Bruce Hayden.  I was in the middle of a call to open a 
problem and I saw both of your posts.


Thanks again.
Jim

Quay, Jonathan (IHG) wrote:

VM64522 moved NUCXDROP into the nucleus.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: NUCXDROP

I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and=20
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to=20
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the=20
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no=20
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4

at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and=20
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

--=20
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu

  


--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Michael Donovan

Jim,

APAR VM64552 removed NUCXDROP MODULE from the S-disk and moved DMSNXD into
the CMS nucleus.  When service was applied, SES was smart enough to know
these changes had been made and it erased NUCXDROP MODULE as part of the
rebuild step.

Cheers!
 Mike Donovan


   
  From:   Jim Bohnsack jab...@cornell.edu
   
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU  
   
  Date:   09/08/2009 12:53 PM  
   
  Subject:NUCXDROP 
   
  Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU  
   





I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4
at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu



Re: NUCXDROP

2009-09-08 Thread Huegel, Thomas
I don't see either NUCXDROP or NUCXLOAD modules on my 5.4 RSU802. 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NUCXDROP

Don't have one on either a 902 system or a 901 system.
No longer have any 801 systems to check.
The command still works though.


Marcy 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] NUCXDROP

I install maintenance, RSU 0902 at the moment, on a 2nd lvl system and
then move it to the test and production lpars.  When getting ready to
move CMS, I compare the 2nd lvl 190 disk with the old 190 disks on the
lpars.  On the 2nd lvl system with z/VM 5.4 at RSU0902, there is no
NUCXDROP MODULE.  It's on the test and production lpars running z/VM 5.4
at the level it was installed last fall, RSU0801, I guess.

Could someone else take a look if you've installed 0902 on z/VM 5.4 and
see if you've got it.  Did I just do a whoops with the maintenance?

Jim

--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu


OT: Looking for U.S. Federal users of Oracle's virtualization

2009-09-08 Thread Thomas Kern
I know these lists do not deal with x86 level virtualization, but I
think the audience knows enough about virtualization to be involved in
their organization's efforts in using other virtualization technologies.

We have begun an implementation of Oracle's virtualization technology,
Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.3 (rebranded copy of RHEL 5.3), Oracle VM
Server (OEL 5 with XEN), and Oracle VM Manager (a db and web interface).

We would like to find other US Federal agencies that have attempted or
succeeded in implementing OVM in production status.

Please reply off-list if you care to share your successes or
horror-stories. After contacting the respondents, I will post a list of
contacts willing to share publicly.

/Tom Kern
/U.S. Dept of Energy
/301-903-2211
/Work-email thomas.k...@hq.doe.gov