Ok, I'm confused now...
Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I’ve added the 515 TCP RSCS; RSCS line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they’re picking up the updated PROFILE TCPIP. I’ve defined a LPR link in RSCSTCP CONFIG, and when I print to it, I still get: 10:26:02 DMTLPR012I Link VA1P8 exit routine LPRXPSE loaded at 01FD0470 10:26:02 DMTLPR181I Link VA1P8 ready for session initiation 10:26:02 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:02 DMTLPR193I Link VA1P8 connecting to host 192.168.101.17 port 515 printe r va1p8 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) 10:26:02 DMTLPR183I Link VA1P8 session terminated 10:26:02 DMTMAN002I Link VA1P8 deactivated 10:26:03 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:03 DMTAXM500I 1 file(s) closed on link VA1P8 The destination host is running LPD, and I can print to it with the CMS command line LPR with no problems. What did I miss? -- db
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
Got a firewall in the way blocking port 515? Ron On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote: Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I’ve added the 515 TCP RSCS ; RSCS line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they’re picking up the updated PROFILE TCPIP. I’ve defined a LPR link in RSCSTCP CONFIG, and when I print to it, I still get: 10:26:02 DMTLPR012I Link VA1P8 exit routine LPRXPSE loaded at 01FD0470 10:26:02 DMTLPR181I Link VA1P8 ready for session initiation 10:26:02 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:02 DMTLPR193I Link VA1P8 connecting to host 192.168.101.17 port 515 printe r va1p8 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) 10:26:02 DMTLPR183I Link VA1P8 session terminated 10:26:02 DMTMAN002I Link VA1P8 deactivated 10:26:03 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:03 DMTAXM500I 1 file(s) closed on link VA1P8 The destination host is running LPD, and I can print to it with the CMS command line LPR with no problems. What did I miss? -- db
MTU on Hipersocket
Not really VM, but z/VSE and Linux A customer I inherited encounters intermittent hangs of their VSE DRDA connection to UDB on Linux on system z. When they restart TCP/IP VSE all goes well again, for weeks or (lately: for a couple of days). The VSE system runs under VM on standard engines and Linux runs under VM on an IFL. We just found out that the defined MTU's differ, and I always heard that MTU sizes should be identical: VSE: DEFINE LINK,ID=OSAFNET,TYPE=OSAX,DEV=D00,MTU=1492,DATAPATH=D02,- PORTNAME=VSEPROD Linux: ifcfg-hsio, reports and MTU of 8192 Might this be an explanation? How comes it works fine (most of the time) with apparently different MTU values? -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
Hi David, Can you post the RSCS LINKDEFINE and PARM statements you coded? Did you specify SECURE=NO on the PARM statement? -Mike From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 11:34 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Ok, I'm confused now... Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I've added the 515 TCP RSCS; RSCS line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they're picking up the updated PROFILE TCPIP. I've defined a LPR link in RSCSTCP CONFIG, and when I print to it, I still get: 10:26:02 DMTLPR012I Link VA1P8 exit routine LPRXPSE loaded at 01FD0470 10:26:02 DMTLPR181I Link VA1P8 ready for session initiation 10:26:02 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:02 DMTLPR193I Link VA1P8 connecting to host 192.168.101.17 port 515 printe r va1p8 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) 10:26:02 DMTLPR183I Link VA1P8 session terminated 10:26:02 DMTMAN002I Link VA1P8 deactivated 10:26:03 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:03 DMTAXM500I 1 file(s) closed on link VA1P8 The destination host is running LPD, and I can print to it with the CMS command line LPR with no problems. What did I miss? -- db
Re: Moderator comment Re: [IBMVM] z/VM/ Linux Systems Programmer Opportunity ...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:13:36 -0500, Alan Ackerman alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote: Am I the only one that reads this list at http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/ibmvm.html? Nope. It's the only way I read it. I don't think I could stand all that clutter in my Email. shudder I like reading it when *I* want and on m y own terms, thank-you very much. Brian Nielsen
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
Add SECURE=NO to the LPR link PARM section, if it is not already there. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 9:34 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Ok, I'm confused now... Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I've added the 515 TCP RSCS; RSCS line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they're picking up the updated PROFILE TCPIP. I've defined a LPR link in RSCSTCP CONFIG, and when I print to it, I still get: 10:26:02 DMTLPR012I Link VA1P8 exit routine LPRXPSE loaded at 01FD0470 10:26:02 DMTLPR181I Link VA1P8 ready for session initiation 10:26:02 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:02 DMTLPR193I Link VA1P8 connecting to host 192.168.101.17 port 515 printe r va1p8 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) 10:26:02 DMTLPR183I Link VA1P8 session terminated 10:26:02 DMTMAN002I Link VA1P8 deactivated 10:26:03 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:03 DMTAXM500I 1 file(s) closed on link VA1P8 The destination host is running LPD, and I can print to it with the CMS command line LPR with no problems. What did I miss? -- db
Re: z/VM 5.4 Install question
Thanks Jonathan Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Quay, Jonathan (IHG) Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:08 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 Install question It didn't take very long, but my workstation is about two hops away from the mainframe osa. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Sun 3/28/2010 2:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 Install question Thanks Jonathan, That's about what I was thinking of doing. Do you remember how long the SEND down to you z/VM system took? It warns in the manual that it could take a while! Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Quay, Jonathan (IHG) Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:22 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 Install question Terry, when I did this, I received .zip files from ShopZSeries. I unzipped them in to a directory structure on my workstation. Then I used my terminal emulator (PCOM) to upload them to a minidisk on my 1st level system's VM 5.4 installation userid (MAINT54 in my case). Instructions/requirements for that userid are on pp 61-62 of. the Guide for Automated Installation and Service. Then follow the instructions in Appendix J. Use the .srl file and the upload is automated for you. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Sun 3/28/2010 12:19 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: z/VM 5.4 Install question https://webmail.ichotelsgroup.com/exchange/Jonathan.Quay/Drafts/RE:%20z _xF8FF_VM%205.4%20Install%20question.EML/image001@01cace6e.f90eedb0 Hi This has probably been broached before here but I could not find the specifics that I was looking for sorry if this is a repeat question. Anyway I am getting ready to install z/VM 5.4 and I ordered the product via Shop Z Series. I was able to download everything including the RSU to my desk top all in the same folder. Since I do not have the means at this time to do the install via DVD I was going to use a Terminal Emulator to Upload Files and install via a z/VM mini disk. I am using the Automated Install and Service Guide as my reference for the install. I know this is going to be slow but it looks like it will work. My question is that it is a little confusing when it keeps talking about the DVD install I am assuming that since the download to my desk top into a folder called CPDVD that by SENDING it via the Terminal Emulator to my z/VM system to a mini disk that it is the same thing as if it were on a real DVD is this a correct assumption? Please add any other information that you think I should be aware of. This is my first real install of the operating system so I want to do it right. Thanks for the help!! Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 cid:image001.jpg@01C97FB5.5EAFD6C0https://webmail.ichotelsgroup.com/exc hange/Jonathan.Quay/Drafts/RE:%20z_xF8FF_VM%205.4%20Install%20question.E ML/image002@01cace6e.f90eedb0
Re: MTU on Hipersocket
On 3/29/2010 at 12:28 PM, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com wrote: Might this be an explanation? How comes it works fine (most of the time) with apparently different MTU values? Absolutely it could be the problem. It will only fail if a packet exceeding the MTU gets sent, so if your traffic is mainly packets 1492, then you won't see it right away. Also, the problem will only occur if it is the Linux system that sends the packet, since it has the larger MTU. Mark Post
DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM
HI, I am at the Hotsite and I am trying to restore my VM volumes under DFDSS on z/OS. The input statement for the restore is: RESTORE - ADMINISTRATOR - TRKS(0,0,30050,14) INDD(BKVM170K)- OUTDD(VM170K) - CPVOLUME - The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. Any ideas on how to get around this?? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191
Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM
Terry, I don't think racf has anything to do with the admin keyword, it lets you act as a dfdss storage admin. Dumb question, have you tired without admin?? Worst that can happen is it won't work like it isn't working now. Mace From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM HI, I am at the Hotsite and I am trying to restore my VM volumes under DFDSS on z/OS. The input statement for the restore is: RESTORE - ADMINISTRATOR - TRKS(0,0,30050,14) INDD(BKVM170K)- OUTDD(VM170K) - CPVOLUME - The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. Any ideas on how to get around this?? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 cid:image001.jpg@01C97FB5.5EAFD6C0 - The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM
Well in further reading I have stuck my foot, or should I say my fingers in my mouth. It talks of creating discrete profiles But I would still try w/o and see what happens Mace From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM HI, I am at the Hotsite and I am trying to restore my VM volumes under DFDSS on z/OS. The input statement for the restore is: RESTORE - ADMINISTRATOR - TRKS(0,0,30050,14) INDD(BKVM170K)- OUTDD(VM170K) - CPVOLUME - The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. Any ideas on how to get around this?? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 cid:image001.jpg@01C97FB5.5EAFD6C0 - The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM
I tried it without ADMIN but there are other SUB parameters on the Restore statement that require ADMIN. Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Macioce, Larry Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:21 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM Well in further reading I have stuck my foot, or should I say my fingers in my mouth. It talks of creating discrete profiles But I would still try w/o and see what happens Mace From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM HI, I am at the Hotsite and I am trying to restore my VM volumes under DFDSS on z/OS. The input statement for the restore is: RESTORE - ADMINISTRATOR - TRKS(0,0,30050,14) INDD(BKVM170K)- OUTDD(VM170K) - CPVOLUME - The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. Any ideas on how to get around this?? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 cid:image001.jpg@01C97FB5.5EAFD6C0 The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Re: MTU on Hipersocket
We just found out that the defined MTU's differ, and I always heard that MTU sizes should be identical: Unless path discovery is active on both ends of the link, the sizes should be identical. Might this be an explanation? How comes it works fine (most of the time) with apparently different MTU values? Nothing sent a packet big enough to cause one end to need fragmentation, so you got lucky. It broke when you got a very large packet that needed to be fragmented, Path MTU discovery was off, and the sending side kept trying to send and got rejected. Since you're running DRDA, that would be an easy scenario to do, since the results of queries would be different sizes.
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
On Monday, 03/29/2010 at 11:41 EDT, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote: Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I?ve added the 515 TCP RSCS; RSCS : 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) : What did I miss? You forgot that the LPR *client* doesn't use port 515, but ports 721-731, inclusive (per RFC 1179). The SECURE=NO recommended by others eliminates the need to reserve those client ports for RSCS. The CMS LPR command only uses the RFC-defined port if you specify the RFCports option on the command. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARMhttp://us.mc656.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?.rand=49569508
--- On Mon, 3/29/10, Macioce, Larry larry.maci...@com.state.oh.us wrote: From: Macioce, Larry larry.maci...@com.state.oh.us Subject: Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: Monday, March 29, 2010, 2:20 PM Well in further reading I have stuck my foot, or should I say my fingers in my mouth. It talks of creating discrete profiles But I would still try w/o and see what happens Mace From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM HI, I am at the Hotsite and I am trying to restore my VM volumes under DFDSS on z/OS. The input statement for the restore is: RESTORE - ADMINISTRATOR - TRKS(0,0,30050,14) INDD(BKVM170K) - OUTDD(VM170K) - CPVOLUME - The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. Any ideas on how to get around this?? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - Citic z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support Office - 443 348-2102 Cell - 443 632-4191 The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
You forgot that the LPR *client* doesn't use port 515, but ports 721- 731, inclusive (per RFC 1179). The SECURE=NO recommended by others eliminates the need to reserve those client ports for RSCS. D'oh! Thanks, Alan. My mind is going. -- db
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
No. Here are the parm statements: LINKDEFINE VA1P8 TYPE LPR FORM * AST PARM VA1P8 EXIT=LPRXPSE HOST=192.168.101.17 PRINTER=va1p8 These worked with 4.4 on the same host, no changes in the print server or firewall settings. Will try SECURE=NO, though. I thought the PROFILE TCPIP entry was the key to not having to mess with SECURE=NO? n Db n Can you post the RSCS LINKDEFINE and PARM statements you coded? Did you specify SECURE=NO on the PARM statement? -Mike From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 11:34 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Ok, I'm confused now... Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I've added the 515 TCP RSCS; RSCS line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they're picking up the updated PROFILE TCPIP. I've defined a LPR link in RSCSTCP CONFIG, and when I print to it, I still get: 10:26:02 DMTLPR012I Link VA1P8 exit routine LPRXPSE loaded at 01FD0470 10:26:02 DMTLPR181I Link VA1P8 ready for session initiation 10:26:02 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:02 DMTLPR193I Link VA1P8 connecting to host 192.168.101.17 port 515 printe r va1p8 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E Socket error on link VA1P8 request=Bind 10:26:02 DMTLPR083E return code=- 1 error number=13 (Permission denied) 10:26:02 DMTLPR183I Link VA1P8 session terminated 10:26:02 DMTMAN002I Link VA1P8 deactivated 10:26:03 DMTAXM109I File queue reordered 10:26:03 DMTAXM500I 1 file(s) closed on link VA1P8 The destination host is running LPD, and I can print to it with the CMS command line LPR with no problems. What did I miss? -- db
Re: DFDSS Restore ADMIN PARM
On Monday, 03/29/2010 at 02:02 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote: The problem that I am having is that I am receiving an Authority error on the ADMINSTRATOR keyword. The Hotsite system we are on does not have RACF. I tried removing the keyword but apparently there are other SUB parameters that require the ADMIN keyword. The DFSMSdss manual says that to use the ADMINISTRATOR keyword, all of the following must be true: o FACILITY class is active. o Applicable FACILITY class profile is defined. o You have READ access to that profile. So while the hotsite may not have RACF, it has something else (ACF2, Top Secret, ...), cuz you can't run z/OS without an ESM! The other ESMs manage classes and profiles, just like RACF does. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: MTU on Hipersocket
OK Thanks, know what to look at tomorrow. 2010/3/29 David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net We just found out that the defined MTU's differ, and I always heard that MTU sizes should be identical: Unless path discovery is active on both ends of the link, the sizes should be identical. Might this be an explanation? How comes it works fine (most of the time) with apparently different MTU values? Nothing sent a packet big enough to cause one end to need fragmentation, so you got lucky. It broke when you got a very large packet that needed to be fragmented, Path MTU discovery was off, and the sending side kept trying to send and got rejected. Since you’re running DRDA, that would be an easy scenario to do, since the results of queries would be different sizes. -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
Re: Ok, I'm confused now...
On Monday, 03/29/2010 at 03:06 EDT, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote: These worked with 4.4 on the same host, no changes in the print server or firewall settings. Will try SECURE=NO, though. Maybe on z/VM 4.3 or earlier, but 4.4 was when we changed the stack to make RestrictLowPorts the default. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Userid/psw required for searching archives?
When I go to: http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/ibmvm.html It now asks me for a userid/password. Did this recently change? Or was there someone playing with the software over the weekend? G Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting
Re: Userid/psw required for searching archives?
On 03/29/2010 02:57 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: When I go to: http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/ibmvm.html It now asks me for a userid/password. Did this recently change? Or was there someone playing with the software over the weekend?G Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting It worked for me and I was able to do a search. Did you clear your cookies recently? -- Rich Smrcina Phone: 414-491-6001 http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2010 - Apr 9-13, 2010 Covington, KY
Re: Userid/psw required for searching archives?
I ate some cookies, but I didn't clear them G. When I try to search, I get: Search Results: You are not authorized to access the archives of the IBMVM list. When I go to IBM VM home, and click on March 2010 (archive), I get: The function you have requested requires authentication. Please enter your e-mail address and your LISTSERV password (not the password you use to login to your computer or read your mail), and click on the Login button. If this is the first time you see this dialog, or if you have forgotten your password, you will need to get a new LISTSERV password first. Interesting Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting Rich Smrcina r...@velocitysoftware.com 3/29/2010 3:03 PM On 03/29/2010 02:57 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: When I go to: http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/ibmvm.html It now asks me for a userid/password. Did this recently change? Or was there someone playing with the software over the weekend?G Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting It worked for me and I was able to do a search. Did you clear your cookies recently? -- Rich Smrcina Phone: 414-491-6001 http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2010 - Apr 9-13, 2010 Covington, KY
Re: Userid/psw required for searching archives?
Then you need to get a new listserv userid and password. On 03/29/2010 05:06 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: I ate some cookies, but I didn't clear themG. When I try to search, I get: Search Results: You are not authorized to access the archives of the IBMVM list. When I go to IBM VM home, and click on March 2010 (archive), I get: The function you have requested requires authentication. Please enter your e-mail address and your LISTSERV password (not the password you use to login to your computer or read your mail), and click on the Login button. If this is the first time you see this dialog, or if you have forgotten your password, you will need to get a new LISTSERV password first. Interesting Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting -- Rich Smrcina Phone: 414-491-6001 http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2010 - Apr 9-13, 2010 Covington, KY
Re: Userid/psw required for searching archives?
On Monday, 03/29/2010 at 06:29 EDT, Rich Smrcina r...@velocitysoftware.com wrote: Then you need to get a new listserv userid and password. First try authenticating with your existing userid and password. My experience is that the cookies expire every so often and you have to re-authenticate. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
