Re: MAILIT question
I am not familiar with MAILIT, but are you polling for files? Is it possible that the files are being created empty, then the contents written into them? In that case you could be trying to process them when they actually are empty, and SFS would not report any error. You could try creating the files with temporary names that do not get picked up by the poll, then rename them after they are complete. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Bill Pettit bill.pet...@ormutual.comwrote: I have been using MAILIT to send emails with attached PDF files for several months now. 99.5% of the time it works like a champ, no errors. But, every now and then I find a few of the emails rejected by SMTP, he says it he rejecting them because they are NULL files. I have nailed this down I think to periods when my SFS server is very busy receiving files from other processes that are running at the same time, it just depends where we are in our nightly batch cycle if this happens to coincide with the sending of the emails with the attached PDF files. The problem is MAILIT always returns me a zero return code, whether the files are rejected by SMTP or not. I am suspecting (and hoping) that MAILIT is getting a return code from SFS saying it cannot provide the file for MAILIT to attach when MAILIT is building the email, but I have not been able to verify that yet. Anyone else that is using MAILIT have a similar experience? Thank you Bill Pettit
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
Did VSWSVC01 used to be an IP VSWITCH? Have you made the appropriate change in the Linux configuration files to make the interface Layer 2? Regarding the Q NIC output, it looks like you must have all the latest 6. 1 service on because there's now a QUERY NIC Class B command. If you wish to receive information about the virtual maching configuration from a use r that also has Class B, you must use the VIRTUAL option. ie. QUERY VIRTUA L NIC.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
Hi Sue, I got the problem, when i created the vswitch i set it to ETHERNET, it can be IP VSWITCH without problem? I reinstall the linux enabling LAYER 2 SUPPORT and works great!.. if possible, can you tell me how enable layer 2 support after installed ? i found option QETH_LAYER2_SUPPORT=“1“ but how get the new LLADDR ? or i can leave it blank? By the way, i set the port group using your article avaiable on http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork/lkagport.html; thanks for sharing !!! On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Sue Farrell sue_farr...@vnet.ibm.comwrote: Did VSWSVC01 used to be an IP VSWITCH? Have you made the appropriate change in the Linux configuration files to make the interface Layer 2? Regarding the Q NIC output, it looks like you must have all the latest 6.1 service on because there's now a QUERY NIC Class B command. If you wish to receive information about the virtual maching configuration from a user that also has Class B, you must use the VIRTUAL option. ie. QUERY VIRTUAL NIC.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
Glad it's working now. I believe all you need to do to enable Layer 2 is what you already did - setting QETH_LAYER2_SUPPORT to '1'. Leave LLADDR blank. Then Linux will use the MAC address assigned to the virtual NIC.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
abou IP VSWITCH i can set it to IP ou i should keep it on ETHERNET ? i have no problem today with ip vswitch, what you think? i enjoy the moment and change it to ethernet or i can still using ip vswitch ? thanks for help , and forgive if is a noob question.. On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sue Farrell sue_farr...@vnet.ibm.comwrote: Glad it's working now. I believe all you need to do to enable Layer 2 is what you already did - setting QETH_LAYER2_SUPPORT to '1'. Leave LLADDR blank. Then Linux will use the MAC address assigned to the virtual NIC.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
abou IP VSWITCH i can set it to IP ou i should keep it on ETHERNET ? i have no problem today with ip vswitch, what you think? i enjoy the moment and change it to ethernet or i can still using ip vswitch ? For Linux systems, I generally recommend ETHERNET. That uses slightly more CPU, but allows pretty much everything to work as it does on other platforms without any weird configuration stuff inside Linux. The main reason you would want to use a IP VSWITCH is to deal with the fact that z/OS doesn't yet support layer 2 OSA devices, so if you have a Linux and a z/OS system connecting to the same VSWITCH, it has to be a layer 3 (eg IP) VSWITCH.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
I agree with what David said about using ETHERNET. In addition, if you want to use Link Ag, you have to use ETHERNET. :-) Sue
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
If you are using LACP, must be ETHERNET. (Layer 2) Marcy From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rogério Soares Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 7:18 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation abou IP VSWITCH i can set it to IP ou i should keep it on ETHERNET ? i have no problem today with ip vswitch, what you think? i enjoy the moment and change it to ethernet or i can still using ip vswitch ? thanks for help , and forgive if is a noob question.. On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sue Farrell sue_farr...@vnet.ibm.commailto:sue_farr...@vnet.ibm.com wrote: Glad it's working now. I believe all you need to do to enable Layer 2 is what you already did - setting QETH_LAYER2_SUPPORT to '1'. Leave LLADDR blank. Then Linux will use the MAC address assigned to the virtual NIC.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
Great David, i haven't zos today, when it comes, we create a new vswitch... i will get you advice, i will enjoy the moment to change it to ethernet... :) thanks again :) On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:24 PM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote: abou IP VSWITCH i can set it to IP ou i should keep it on ETHERNET ? i have no problem today with ip vswitch, what you think? i enjoy the moment and change it to ethernet or i can still using ip vswitch ? For Linux systems, I generally recommend ETHERNET. That uses slightly more CPU, but allows pretty much everything to work as it does on other platforms without any weird configuration stuff inside Linux. The main reason you would want to use a IP VSWITCH is to deal with the fact that z/OS doesn't yet support layer 2 OSA devices, so if you have a Linux and a z/OS system connecting to the same VSWITCH, it has to be a layer 3 (eg IP) VSWITCH.
Re: definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation
Thanks for the help peoples.. Problem Solved! On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: If you are using LACP, must be ETHERNET. (Layer 2) Marcy *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Rogério Soares *Sent:* Friday, January 21, 2011 7:18 AM *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: [IBMVM] definition of guest using port group and vswitch (link aggregation abou IP VSWITCH i can set it to IP ou i should keep it on ETHERNET ? i have no problem today with ip vswitch, what you think? i enjoy the moment and change it to ethernet or i can still using ip vswitch ? thanks for help , and forgive if is a noob question.. On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sue Farrell sue_farr...@vnet.ibm.com wrote: Glad it's working now. I believe all you need to do to enable Layer 2 is what you already did - setting QETH_LAYER2_SUPPORT to '1'. Leave LLADDR blank. Then Linux will use the MAC address assigned to the virtual NIC.
Melinda's Web Page has moved ...
... to http://web.me.com/melinda.varian/
Velocity Software Performance Update (V4.1) - Jersey City
Velocity Software will be conducting a seminar in Jersey City, on March 17th, for Version 4 of zVPS (formerly ESALPS). Topics and registration information can be found on the link below. Velocity Software customers should find this seminar useful. _http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/v4update.html_ (http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/v4update.html) Regards, Len
Re: Velocity Software Performance Update (V4.1) - Jersey City
Len, where in Jersey City is the Location? I have already gotten e-mails asking if it is at BBH ? thanx munson From: Len Diegel ldie...@aol.com To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 01/21/2011 01:00 PM Subject:Velocity Software Performance Update (V4.1) - Jersey City Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Velocity Software will be conducting a seminar in Jersey City, on March 17th, for Version 4 of zVPS (formerly ESALPS). Topics and registration information can be found on the link below. Velocity Software customers should find this seminar useful. http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/v4update.html Regards, Len *** IMPORTANT NOTE*-- The opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates (BBH). There is no guarantee that this message is either private or confidential, and it may have been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing in the message is capable or intended to create any legally binding obligations on either party and it is not intended to provide legal advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or damage from its use, including damage from virus.
Performance Education scheduled
For those of you interested in performance, or performance management of your Linux and z/VM environment, our Performance Education schedule is now posted for 1st half, at http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/index.html;. Offerings are the 4 day workshop and 1 day seminars.
Re: Velocity Software Performance Update (V4.1) - Jersey City
Bill, more info will be on the website link. Marriott Courtyard - 540 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ 07310 9am - 2pm Thanks. Len In a message dated 1/21/2011 12:20:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, william.mun...@bbh.com writes: Len, where in Jersey City is the Location? I have already gotten e-mails asking if it is at BBH ? thanx munson From:Len Diegel ldie...@aol.com To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date:01/21/2011 01:00 PM Subject:Velocity Software Performance Update (V4.1) - Jersey City Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Velocity Software will be conducting a seminar in Jersey City, on March 17th, for Version 4 of zVPS (formerly ESALPS). Topics and registration information can be found on the link below. Velocity Software customers should find this seminar useful. _http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/v4update.html_ (http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/v4update.html) Regards, Len *** IMPORTANT NOTE*-- The opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates (BBH). There is no guarantee that this message is either private or confidential, and it may have been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing in the message is capable or intended to create any legally binding obligations on either party and it is not intended to provide legal advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or damage from its use, including damage from virus.
Re: MAILIT question
Kris; I have verified the PDF files that MAILIT is attempting to send as attached files are not empty PDF files. And for several weeks I have been displaying the return code from the MAILIT call in my EXEC. Below are snippets of the console files from my exec calling MAILIT and my SMTP server. This only happens once in a while and never for all of the files/emails being sent during a particular call to the process. On this night (1/18) there were 176 emails sent with attached PDF files, and 7 were rejected by SMTP as being null. I read in one of the files that got rejected to my reader by SMTP, I can tell it's a file from MAILIT but that is about it. IF my SFS server rejected the request from MAILIT to access the PDF file I am trying to attach to my the email, would MAILIT report that rejection in it's return code when it comes back to my exec? === From my exec calling MAILIT === 13612 Send_attached_file: 13613dfer...@serinc.netmailto:dfer...@serinc.net23 PDF R1 22:20:53 13614 Mailit-rc= 0 13615 * From SMTP: Received Spool File 3875 === From my SMTP machine === 04451 RDR FILE 3874 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6954 RECS 0191 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP - 04452 RDR FILE 3875 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6955 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP - 04453 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:20:53 Null Spool File: 3875 transferred to BILLP 04454 RDR FILE 3876 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6956 RECS 0200 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04455 RDR FILE 3877 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6957 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04456 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:13 Null Spool File: 3877 transferred to BILLP 04457 RDR FILE 3878 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6958 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04458 RDR FILE 3879 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6959 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04459 RDR FILE 3880 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6960 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04460 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:43 Null Spool File: 3880 transferred to BILLP === Thank you Bill -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:41 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MAILIT question No, no-oneever told me about such problems. Note that there are no timeout mechanisms in SFS, so a slow SFS server can only cause a slowdown of MAILIT. At the other hand, if the SMTP server on VM is slowed down, maybe the mail server it is sending mail too gets impatient? MAILIT can not know if SMTP dislikes a mail file: it doesn't communicate with SMTP: it simply creates a spool file and send that to SMTP. If you suspect MAILIT gives RC 0 when a file to attach isn't found, simply try it out? Like this MAILIT TEST TO( at ) subject test attach(notexist file) text this is a test 2011/1/20 Bill Pettit bill.pet...@ormutual.commailto:bill.pet...@ormutual.com I have been using MAILIT to send emails with attached PDF files for several months now. 99.5% of the time it works like a champ, no errors. But, every now and then I find a few of the emails rejected by SMTP, he says it he rejecting them because they are NULL files. I have nailed this down I think to periods when my SFS server is very busy receiving files from other processes that are running at the same time, it just depends where we are in our nightly batch cycle if this happens to coincide with the sending of the emails with the attached PDF files. The problem is MAILIT always returns me a zero return code, whether the files are rejected by SMTP or not. I am suspecting (and hoping) that MAILIT is getting a return code from SFS saying it cannot provide the file for MAILIT to attach when MAILIT is building the email, but I have not been able to verify that yet. Anyone else that is using MAILIT have a similar experience? Thank you Bill Pettit -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
Re: MAILIT question
Have you looked at these spool files containing 4 records? If so, what do they look like? James R. Hughes TSG, Problem Solver NH Department of Information Technology 603-271-5586(w); 603-491-3071(c) www.nh.gov/doit Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are confidential. Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either whole or in part) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system. It is fun to do the impossible. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Pettit Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:42 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MAILIT question Kris; I have verified the PDF files that MAILIT is attempting to send as attached files are not empty PDF files. And for several weeks I have been displaying the return code from the MAILIT call in my EXEC. Below are snippets of the console files from my exec calling MAILIT and my SMTP server. This only happens once in a while and never for all of the files/emails being sent during a particular call to the process. On this night (1/18) there were 176 emails sent with attached PDF files, and 7 were rejected by SMTP as being null. I read in one of the files that got rejected to my reader by SMTP, I can tell it's a file from MAILIT but that is about it. IF my SFS server rejected the request from MAILIT to access the PDF file I am trying to attach to my the email, would MAILIT report that rejection in it's return code when it comes back to my exec? === From my exec calling MAILIT === 13612 Send_attached_file: 13613dfer...@serinc.net23 PDF R1 22:20:53 13614 Mailit-rc= 0 13615 * From SMTP: Received Spool File 3875 === From my SMTP machine === 04451 RDR FILE 3874 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6954 RECS 0191 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP - 04452 RDR FILE 3875 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6955 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP - 04453 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:20:53 Null Spool File: 3875 transferred to BILLP 04454 RDR FILE 3876 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6956 RECS 0200 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04455 RDR FILE 3877 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6957 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04456 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:13 Null Spool File: 3877 transferred to BILLP 04457 RDR FILE 3878 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6958 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04458 RDR FILE 3879 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6959 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04459 RDR FILE 3880 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6960 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 04460 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:43 Null Spool File: 3880 transferred to BILLP === Thank you Bill -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:41 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MAILIT question No, no-oneever told me about such problems. Note that there are no timeout mechanisms in SFS, so a slow SFS server can only cause a slowdown of MAILIT. At the other hand, if the SMTP server on VM is slowed down, maybe the mail server it is sending mail too gets impatient? MAILIT can not know if SMTP dislikes a mail file: it doesn't communicate with SMTP: it simply creates a spool file and send that to SMTP. If you suspect MAILIT gives RC 0 when a file to attach isn't found, simply try it out? Like this MAILIT TEST TO( at ) subject test attach(notexist file) text this is a test 2011/1/20 Bill Pettit bill.pet...@ormutual.com I have been using MAILIT to send emails with attached PDF files for several months now. 99.5% of the time it works like a champ, no errors. But, every now and then I find a few of the emails rejected by SMTP, he says it he rejecting them because they are NULL files. I have nailed this down I think to periods when my SFS server is very busy receiving files from other processes that are running at the same time, it just depends where we are in our nightly batch cycle if this happens to coincide with the sending of the emails with the attached PDF files. The problem is MAILIT always returns me a zero return code, whether the files are rejected by SMTP or not. I am suspecting (and hoping) that MAILIT is getting a return code from SFS saying it cannot provide the file for MAILIT to attach when MAILIT is building the email, but I have not been able to verify that yet. Anyone else that is using MAILIT have a similar experience? Thank you Bill Pettit -- Kris
Re: MAILIT question
I tested MAILIT today with an ATTACH of a not existing file, and in such a
case nothing gets sent.
I just looked at the code. the actual sending to SMTP happens in
SendNetDataFile:
'PIPE (Name PunchMail end ~) STEM HEAD.', /* take the header info */
SmtpPrefFil, /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
SmtpBodyHdr, /* Maybe insert header for body */
'|APPEND VAR PrefaceText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface */
'|APPEND VAR Contents||Deblock Linend', /* The body of the file */
'|APPEND VAR AppendText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface*/
left('|CONSOLE',8*console),
SmtpAttFil, /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
FixDotLineForSmtp,/* Maybe fix a line with . only */
ApndMailTrail, /* take the trailer info */
padding, /* pad with blanks if FIXED file */
'|CHANGE //'||'00'x||'/', /* Tell it are data records */
'|PREFACE VAR INMR03',/* add INMR header record */
'|PREFACE VAR INMR02',/* add INMR header record */
'|PREFACE VAR INMR04',/* add INMR user parms */
'|PREFACE VAR INMR01',/* add INMR header record */
'|APPEND VAR INMR06', /* add INMR trailer record */
'|CT1: COUNT bytes',
'|BLOCK 80 NETDATA', /* Make NETDATA punch format */
'|CT2: COUNT bytes',
'|PUNCH',
'~CT1:|VAR CT1 ~CT2:|VAR CT2'
if rc0 then do
call diag 8,'SPOOL D PURGE' /* remove unfinished spool file */
return 405 'PIPE had problems with PUNCH'
end
The SMTPATTFIL Rexx variable -used above- contains a stage to read the
files to attach, and that should set this PIPE's rc to non-zero when it
fails, and the punched file would get purged.
What MAILIT also does is purging any unclosed spool file data on 000D before
it starts to punch itself with the above PIPE.
2011/1/21 Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov
Have you looked at these spool files containing 4 records? If so, what
do they look like?
James R. Hughes
TSG, Problem Solver
NH Department of Information Technology
603-271-5586(w); 603-491-3071(c)
www.nh.gov/doit
Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are
confidential. Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or
dissemination (either whole or in part) is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the message from your system.
It is fun to do the impossible.
--
*From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On
Behalf Of *Bill Pettit
*Sent:* Friday, January 21, 2011 12:42 PM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: MAILIT question
Kris;
I have verified the PDF files that MAILIT is attempting to send as attached
files are not empty PDF files. And for several weeks I have been displaying
the return code from the MAILIT call in my EXEC. Below are snippets of the
console files from my exec calling MAILIT and my SMTP server.
This only happens once in a while and never for all of the files/emails
being sent during a particular call to the process. On this night
(1/18) there were 176 emails sent with attached PDF files, and 7 were
rejected by SMTP as being null. I read in one of the files that got
rejected to my reader by SMTP, I can tell it's a file from MAILIT but that
is about it.
IF my SFS server rejected the request from MAILIT to access the PDF file I
am trying to attach to my the email, would MAILIT report that rejection in
it's return code when it comes back to my exec?
===
From my exec calling MAILIT
===
13612 Send_attached_file:
13613dfer...@serinc.net23 PDF R1
22:20:53
13614 Mailit-rc=
0
13615 * From SMTP: Received Spool File
3875
===
From my SMTP machine
===
04451 RDR FILE 3874 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6954 RECS 0191 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
- 04452 RDR FILE 3875 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6955 RECS 0004 CPY 001
A NOHOLD
NOKEEP
- 04453 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:20:53 Null Spool File: 3875
transferred to
BILLP
04454 RDR FILE 3876 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6956 RECS 0200 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
04455 RDR FILE 3877 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6957 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
04456 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:13 Null Spool File: 3877 transferred
to
BILLP
04457 RDR FILE 3878 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6958 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
04458 RDR FILE 3879 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6959 RECS 0192 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
04459 RDR FILE 3880 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6960 RECS 0004 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD
NOKEEP
04460 DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:43 Null Spool File: 3880 transferred
to BILLP
===
Thank you
Bill
-Original Message-
*From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System
Re: Melinda's Web Page has moved ...
And it appears to have some updates. Except for that guy with the Heineken stack. I *know* he doesn't look like that anymore. He's obviously a teacher of some sort, demonstrating important university research techniques. And who's that in the background? Looks like Stuart McRae. -- R; On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:55, Jeff Gribbin jeff.grib...@gmail.com wrote: ... to http://web.me.com/melinda.varian/
dynamically add page packs
HI,listers, Can someone provide hoe to setup or LIST the option LNKNOPASS directory ocntrol statement in RACF ? Thanks, Ann
Re: dynamically add page packs
Wow -- some things wrong here.. the subject is about dynamically adding page packs?? LNKNOPAS is a directory control statement - RACF is an ESM (external security manager) and there is no relationship between the directory statement and RACF rules. RACF is not aware of what is in the directory - only what is defined in its database of resources and rules. The best I can come up with here is that RACF OPERATIONS authority is somewhat similar to LNKNOPAS.. is that what you mean? Can you try again? :-) Scott Rohling On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Aisik Chang a829...@gmail.com wrote: HI,listers, Can someone provide hoe to setup or LIST the option LNKNOPASS directory ocntrol statement in RACF ? Thanks, Ann
