Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-16 Thread Bob Bolch
 The SMAPI server requires a directory manager, and DirMaint has been
 enhanced to work with the new server. From IBM's perspective,
 there is no reason to not go there just yet.

One reason might be that your provisioning product supports the RPC server
but does not (yet?) support the SMAPI Socket server. One product in this
situation is IBM Director (from IBM).

Bob Bolch


Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-16 Thread John Franciscovich
All true, and I agree. Marcy didn't ask about specific products, and
I did not mean to imply anything about exploiter products and/or
releases; my intent was to clarify things relative to the SMAPI server
virtual machines and z/VM releases.

John Franciscovich
z/VM Development

Well, I guess it depends on what Marcy is intending to do with SMAPI. I
made the assumption that she was asking the question relative to IBM
Director ... but I could obviously be wrong about that?

At this point in time, I don't believe there is a GA IBM Director that
supports the SMAPI socket based server. =20

One reason might be that your provisioning product supports the RPC
server but does not (yet?) support the SMAPI Socket server.
One product in this situation is IBM Director (from IBM).


Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-15 Thread Marcy Cortes
 
I guess I can't then ;)
Thanks JR!



Marcy Cortes 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Imler, Steven J
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question about SMAPI

VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).

VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server implementation
... the socket server.  However, I wouldn't go there just yet ...

JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel:  +1 703 708 3479
Fax:  +1 703 708 3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 01:59 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Question about SMAPI
 
 Am I right in understanding that VSMSERVE was replaced by VSMREQIN and

 VSMREQIU and the VSMWORK* machines going in z/VM 5.3?
 
 
 Marcy Cortes
 
 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
 If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the 
 addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based 
 on this message or any information herein. If you have received this 
 message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail

 and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
 
 


Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-15 Thread Imler, Steven J
VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).

VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server implementation
... the socket server.  However, I wouldn't go there just yet ...

JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel:  +1 703 708 3479
Fax:  +1 703 708 3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 01:59 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Question about SMAPI
 
 Am I right in understanding that VSMSERVE was replaced by VSMREQIN and
 VSMREQIU and the VSMWORK* machines going in z/VM 5.3?
 
 
 Marcy Cortes 
 
 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged 
 information. If
 you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
 addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any 
 action based on
 this message or any information herein. If you have received this
 message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
 and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
 
 


Question about SMAPI

2007-11-15 Thread Marcy Cortes
Am I right in understanding that VSMSERVE was replaced by VSMREQIN and
VSMREQIU and the VSMWORK* machines going in z/VM 5.3?


Marcy Cortes 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-15 Thread John Franciscovich
VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).

VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server implementation
... the socket server.  However, I wouldn't go there just yet ...


(SMAPI = Systems Management APIs)...

It is correct that the VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, and VSMWORKn virtual machines
are new in z/VM 5.3, as part of the new sockets-based SMAPI server.
The SMAPI server requires a directory manager, and DirMaint has been
enhanced to work with the new server. From IBM's perspective,
there is no reason to not go there just yet.

VSMSERVE is the RPC-based SMAPI server and is still available on
z/VM 5.3, with the same SMAPI function that was provided in z/VM 5.2.
All new SMAPI function in 5.3 is available only on the new (sockets)
server, as will any enhancements provided in the future.

The z/VM 5.3 announcement includes the following Statement of Direction:
IBM intends to withdraw support for the RPC/CSL interface from the
Systems Management API server in a future z/VM release.

John Franciscovich
z/VM Development


Re: Question about SMAPI

2007-11-15 Thread Imler, Steven J
Well, I guess it depends on what Marcy is intending to do with SMAPI.  I
made the assumption that she was asking the question relative to IBM
Director ... but I could obviously be wrong about that?

At this point in time, I don't believe there is a GA IBM Director that
supports the SMAPI socket based server.  

JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel:  +1 703 708 3479
Fax:  +1 703 708 3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Franciscovich
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 04:08 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: Question about SMAPI
 
 VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still 
 valid for
 use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).
 
 VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server 
 implementation
 ... the socket server.  However, I wouldn't go there just yet ...
 
 
 (SMAPI = Systems Management APIs)...
 
 It is correct that the VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, and VSMWORKn 
 virtual machines
 are new in z/VM 5.3, as part of the new sockets-based SMAPI server.
 The SMAPI server requires a directory manager, and DirMaint has been
 enhanced to work with the new server. From IBM's perspective,
 there is no reason to not go there just yet.
 
 VSMSERVE is the RPC-based SMAPI server and is still available on
 z/VM 5.3, with the same SMAPI function that was provided in z/VM 5.2.
 All new SMAPI function in 5.3 is available only on the new (sockets)
 server, as will any enhancements provided in the future.
 
 The z/VM 5.3 announcement includes the following Statement of 
 Direction:
 IBM intends to withdraw support for the RPC/CSL interface from the
 Systems Management API server in a future z/VM release.
 
 John Franciscovich
 z/VM Development