[IMail Forum] bounce mail
Hi, We now have a few companies, two or three, who keep sending us advertisement we do not want. It's realy low volume but eventhough they do react to calls/e-mails, for some reason they keep sending those advertisements. I want all mail from those companies to be bounced, not simply deleted to let them know what we get and for them to "feel" the problem themselves. How do I do that? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma senior systeembeheerder tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] rule not working
Hi, Ok what I found so far: H~List-Id\: Radiator users :Other lists\Radiator H~Radiator users :Other lists\Radiator H~List-Id\: Radiator users \:Other lists\Radiator Does NOT work. H~radiator\.open\.com\.au:Other lists\Radiator H~List-Id\: Radiator users .radiator\.open\.com\.au:Other lists\Radiator H~List-Id\: Radiator users \ char are not seen as special char in the RegEx string it seems they are treated as such. The webinterface for creating rules does not handle the <> chars properly. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Bonno Bloksma To: IMail_Forum Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 7:25 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] rule not working Hi, Using IMail 9.23 I'm subscribed to a list where the headers of the mails contains: [] Precedence: list List-Id: Radiator users List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.open.com.au/mailman/options/radiator>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [.] I want those mails to be moved to a folder I've created. The rule is: H~List-Id\: Radiator users :Other lists\Radiator From the log: C:\Temp>grep 12bd sys0709.txt 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [217.114.99.201] connect 209.61.182.19 port 56839 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] EHLO server1.open.com.au 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] C:\IMail\spool\D653c01bb12bd.SMD 14823 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) performing antispam checks 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) processing C:\IMail\spool\q653c01bb12bd.smd 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) ldeliver tio.nl b.bloksma-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15378 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) finished C:\IMail\spool\q653c01bb12bd.smd status=1 The mail simply ends up in my main folder. There is no error why the rule is not applied so I'm assuming it simply does not match but why? I've copied the header line into the webmail rule editor. It has added the escape for the reserved characters so I'm pretty sure they are correctly applied as well. I've got other similar rules that DO work: H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail which matches with a header like: List-Id: Here I have not escaped the period as a period will match a period anyway. I can see three differences. 1) The radiator rule has a colon in it. It has been escaped but maybe there is a problem with that 2) The rule has a space in the string to be matched 3) There are a < and > in the string to be matched Is it know whether any of those will be a problem? I'll do some more experimenting but it seems at least something is broken. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] logging mailing lists
Hi, We have one mailist list that we use and as far as I know I have all security set up correctly. The list is populated by us based on student participating in an event and we just edit the corresponding users.lst file. The settings are: "Allow Posting by:" Moderators. No"Allow Unsubscribes based on subject line" Yes"Disallow Subscription ( ie: Private list) Yes"Disable list command" Yes"Enable Posters list" NoUse password There is a posters file, it has just one e-mail address. Now what happens if: Someone else sending a mail to the list? Does it just disapper or does it gtet sent to the list owner of somewhere else? Can someone fake the poster e-mail address? Where is the log for e-mails sent via the list? I've looked before and there seems to be practicaly nothing in the sysMMDD log about messages sent to/via a list. Is there a seperate log I need to activate? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] rule not working
Hi, Using IMail 9.23 I'm subscribed to a list where the headers of the mails contains: [] Precedence: list List-Id: Radiator users List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.open.com.au/mailman/options/radiator>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [.] I want those mails to be moved to a folder I've created. The rule is: H~List-Id\: Radiator users :Other lists\Radiator >From the log: C:\Temp>grep 12bd sys0709.txt 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [217.114.99.201] connect 209.61.182.19 port 56839 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] EHLO server1.open.com.au 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) [209.61.182.19] C:\IMail\spool\D653c01bb12bd.SMD 14823 07:09 09:14 SMTPD(653c01bb12bd) performing antispam checks 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) processing C:\IMail\spool\q653c01bb12bd.smd 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) ldeliver tio.nl b.bloksma-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15378 07:09 09:14 SMTP-(653c01bb12bd) finished C:\IMail\spool\q653c01bb12bd.smd status=1 The mail simply ends up in my main folder. There is no error why the rule is not applied so I'm assuming it simply does not match but why? I've copied the header line into the webmail rule editor. It has added the escape for the reserved characters so I'm pretty sure they are correctly applied as well. I've got other similar rules that DO work: H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail which matches with a header like: List-Id: Here I have not escaped the period as a period will match a period anyway. I can see three differences. 1) The radiator rule has a colon in it. It has been escaped but maybe there is a problem with that 2) The rule has a space in the string to be matched 3) There are a < and > in the string to be matched Is it know whether any of those will be a problem? I'll do some more experimenting but it seems at least something is broken. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] default font
Hi, Using IMail 9.23 Can I set the default font somewhere? Right now it's Times New Roman (size?) but we would like Arial 10pt to be the default. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo t 074 255 06 10 / f 074 255 06 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] Fw: Oops deleted declude.exe
Hi, Small bug in eye brain keyboard interface make me delete the wrong file, \imail\declude.exe. :-( Had it restored from backup in a few minutes but in those few minutes I had several lines like: 06:06 17:51 SMTPD(5d0803e2505d) (CP) error 2 executing "C:\IMail\Declude.exe" "C:\IMail\spool\Q5d0803e2505d.SMD" 06:06 17:51 SMTPD(5cf903e55025) (CP) error 2 executing "C:\IMail\Declude.exe" "C:\IMail\spool\Q5cf903e55025.SMD" 06:06 17:51 SMTPD(5cf904585026) (CP) error 2 executing "C:\IMail\Declude.exe" "C:\IMail\spool\Q5cf904585026.SMD" in my log. I now have several D*smd A*.smd pairs in my \imail\spool directory. Can I simply rename A to Q and drop the pairs in the \imail\spool\proc directory? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] mail on server, and not... using IMAP
Hi, Several users, all using Outlook Express and IMAP see this behaviour. Outlook Express reports x number of unread mails in a certain mail folder. When the user goes to that folder no new mails are visible. Using the webmail interface the mails are there. Or the reverse, OE reports no new mail in a certain folder, when I select that folder, suddenly I see several new mails. I'm assuming this in an OE bug but just in case, is there a way arround it other than deleting the *.uid file and force OE to reread the whole mailfolder? Is this related to the bug where a new mail will be reported, OE will show the header. Once the user selects that mail and OE want to get the body of the mail is reports the mail is no longer on the server? Work arround to that bug is to move the mail to another folder using OE after which the mail is readable in the new folder. Oh yeah, and in moving the mail OE is suddenly able to read the mail and move it, all the while reporting it cannot read the mail. :-( Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] IMail Server Announces Release of Version 10
Hi, As we're a school I'll wait until summer before upgrading. But... the complete support for international characters is an important feature for us. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:03 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Server Announces Release of Version 10 Anyone take the plunge yet? Travis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:25 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail Server Announces Release of Version 10 YAY Brad Senter wrote: IMail Server Version 10 was released to the public today, April 21, 2008. Many new features have been added to improve security, ease-of-use and low-bandwidth concerns. For IMail Server Version 10, we have addressed many of the issues that were associated with previous versions. Here are some of the highlights: New Features . Ipswitch designed its own Digital Rights Management tool to replace HASP from Aladdin Knowledge Systems, Inc. (All previous IMail versions will continue to run on HASP.) . User Password Complexity Setting. System Administrators can now decide how complex user passwords should be. . Account Suspension from multiple failed Logins (Web Messaging only). If a user fails to login with the correct ID and password after a predetermined number of times (determined by the System Administrator) that account will be suspended. . Checkboxes for message selection/deletion. . User Interfaces have been updated in several places for better ease-of-use. . Web Messaging Lite - Users with low-bandwidth (dial-up) can use this to access their mailboxes more quickly. Improvements: . IMonitor has been removed, which has improved IMail's performance by reducing false positives. . Plain text emails print at a larger font size now, so they are easier to read. . Improved the installation process. . Web Administrator has been internationalized, all foreign characters can now be supported. . Dirty IP setting under Premium Filter has been changed to take "No Action," during new installation. These are only a few of the new features and improvements we've made. For a complete list of new features and improvements for Version 10 please read the full release notes at: http://docs.ipswitch.com/_Messaging/IMailServer/v10/ReleaseNotes/index.htm. Brad Senter Product Marketing Manager Ipswitch - Messaging Division This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator.
[IMail Forum] defrag disk
Hi, Although Windows 2003 now can call the defrag via a WMI script http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/topics/win2003/defrag.mspx I cannot tell it to stop defragging after a while. It will finish when IT want's to finish. I'd rather have the thing defrag every night for a hour (or two) and stop after that. What hasn't been done it can do the next day. Anyone know of a way to do that? The objVolume.Defrag() method does not seem to take any parameters. Any other program doing it better? My mailserver is a Windows 2003 R2 server with plenty of RAM, it seems the disk access is getting to be the bottleneck eventhough I have the C: drive, with the spool and log files, as RAID 1 and the D: drive with th mailboxes as a 4 disk RAID 5. Logfiles get ZIPped every night. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] Renaming a User ID
Hi, What version of Imail are you running. I had this error once when the was not a single address in the users addressbook but (as far as I know) that bug has been fixed a while ago. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:56 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Renaming a User ID When renaming a UserID in the IAdmin web interface I get the following error. How do I get around this? Error Message Collaboration user not found Thanks, Travis
Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum
Hi, > ...would that prevent an email sent to that alias from going out? As far as I know... yes. I have the same problem. We sometimes send mails to all of our students in one mail, that's over a THOUSAND recipients. Also we run a mailing list on our sever. Clearly I cannot use that directive. Besides that where is the added security in lowering the number of recipients per message? Spammers know not to use large batches, the number of recipients they use will probably be lower than what is configured on most servers. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Eric Geater To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:10 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Maximum On Imail 2006.1, we've presently got our domain properties to a "default maximum message" count of 0 (infinity). I have a tech who wants to change this value to a lower number, as a preventative measure. But we have an alias that sends an email to "everyone in the company", which at present includes 200 names. If we set the "Default Maximum Messages" to 100, would that prevent an email sent to that alias from going out? thanks, Eric
[IMail Forum] CDOSYS and invalid e-mail address
Hi, We use CDOSYS to send mail from out website to the mailserver. On some automated forms it is possible to add an e-mail address to a CC-list. Sometimes sending the mail wil fail because a user wil enter a wrong e-mail address. The IMail server will refuse to accept the mail. It seems CDOSYS has no proper error handling, at least we could not find any relevant to this case. Is there any structured way CDOSYS will report an error in a way that is more informative then just: "There is a problem." ;-) Is there a list of the errors CDOSYS can produce and what they mean? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: VOIP class
WAY OT: VOIP classHi, I've been on this train a while, started looking for implementation of VoIP a few years ago. Mid 2008 we are finalyy going to implement it as well. I can't tell you about callses as I'm on the other side of the big pond but. 1) Make sure your MAN/WAN connections are up to it. - They need to be fast enough (about 80k per simultanious call) - You need some form of quality controll to make sure time critical packets like VoIP and later probably Video etc, are delived in time during heavy traffic - Time for the VoIP etc packets on the line must not me to high (ping times < 100ms) and not change to mutch (jitter < ?%) 2) Make sure your LAN connections are up to it. - You need managed switches that can handle the QoS 802.1p protocol - The switches need to have large enough buffers for 802.1p when you expect lots of VoIP calls. 3) At first I thought I needed VoIP capable hardware from "real" companies like Mitel, 3Com or Philips, Siemens, Alcatel, etc. However, last year I attended a seminar about Open software VoIP sollutions and found out Asterisk with the proper support is stable enough for some universities or towns to totally rely on it. When you wand redundancy by havind a second VoIP server at a second site suddenly Asterisk gets very interesting as most of the "real" companies charge extra licensed for a second server. Also "when you want the supported features a VoIP server has to be used by a lot of people in the company prices can soar when you use a server with licences. I've looked at a hybrid solution because of all the hardware we still have. I then asked if their product supported voicemail boxes for all users and roaming users. Sure they said. I then asked for the price to have ALL users use these features and the price more then doubled. That's the nice thing about open software. If the feature is there it is free for all to use. Product software upgrades can be expensive as well. If you have a SA or something like it on the product that can be expensive as well. When you look at alternatives make sure al least one company is offering Asterisk with support from them. That way you have the support of someone who knows the product and you get all the features and upgrades for free. Support for an Asterisk server is usually A LOT cheaper then on a commercial product as they need only to charge you for their time. I'm not telling you that you should no longer look at commercial products, but if you have at least one Linux machine in you network now then you know Open software can sometimes be the sollution. It's like that with VoIP as well. Have a look at the features it supports. http://www.asterisk.org/ Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Sharyn Schmidt To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 4:03 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: VOIP class We are being forced to bite the bullet and begin implementation of VoIP, beginning mid 2008. Guess who will be in charge of the implementation and troubleshooting? Yep, that would be me. What do I know about this? Other than how it works in theory, nada and nothing. I'm in the Central Fl area. Can anyone recommend a good class to take that will at least give me a good idea of what I need to learn? Thanks! Sharyn
Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Switch recommendations?
Hi, Have a look at the HP Procurve line, The 29xx series does most of what you want, but is not stackable. However, The only "reason" for being stackable is having the switches communicate at backplane speed between them right? If that is realy nessesary you need to look at the coreswitches that are in a frame where one can plug in modules. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: SJ.Stanaitis To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 9:12 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Switch recommendations? All, I'm looking for a stackable 48-port managed switch that supports PoE, IP Precedence, CoS, layer 3, and is 10/100/1000. It's for implementing an internal VOIP setup... I've been pointed to a Netgear unit but I can't imagine spending nearly $2k on something from Netgear... Can someone recommend a suitable switch? Thanks, --SJ
[IMail Forum] apimmdd.txt files
Hi, As of IMail 2006.23 I have apimmdd.txt logfiles. However I cannot find what these are for. Is this the new extra debugging for the webmail? There seem to be no release notes for 2006.23, at least I cannot find them. Appart from that, everything seems to be working ok. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] Moving to a new Server
Hi Kevin, I only have three domains and did it another way because I wanted a "clean" install after all the upgrades we went through (started with 6.x). See my mail in the archives (okt 2006) what I did. But.. like I said, I only had three domains. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Kevin Stanford To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:42 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Moving to a new Server I am getting ready to move Imail to a new server and want to make sure I understand the procedure. We are currently running Imail 8.22 on a Windows2000 server and we want to move to Imail 2006.23 on a Windows2003 server. If I understand correctly we will need to put 8.22 on the new machine then follow the steps in Document IM-19980116-jb11.htm. And then "upgrade" to 2006.23. Is my understanding correct? Also has anyone else done this and have any suggestions? I am not opposed to contracting this out if anyone is interested, if so please contact me off list. Thanks, Kevin To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Fw: Ipswitch Forums - New Private Message!
Hi, Grrr, I'm now getting spam mail on the Ipswitch forum. :-( Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hospitality en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:46 PM Subject: Ipswitch Forums - New Private Message! Hi Bonno Bloksma, This is a friendly notification to inform you that mable4you sent you a new private message entitled: "Lady Mable Kabila.". Click the link below to read and respond to this message. http://forums.ipswitch.com/PrivateMessage29916-1760.aspx - Ipswitch Forums http://forums.ipswitch.com/
[IMail Forum] list files
Hi, According to http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19981218-EM01.htm the e-mail addresses in users.lst should be: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I just wanted to update a new list with a some hundred new users and noticed the few users in there added via the "normal" interface are listed like: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1) What is the correct syntax for the users.lst file? 2) Can I mix those formats, with and without he < > 3) Does the Users.txt file have to be filled with the same addresses and names? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] feature request
Hi Tripp, With the recent development of the GBUdb mechanism in Sniffer I would very much like to be able to block the realy bad ip-numbers in IMail. As there is currently no scripted way to get the info in the IMail ACL could you put this on the wish list? As of this week the spammers are starting to send huge batches of spam in a very short period to my mailserver. We have a normal volume of "real" mail of about 4000-6000 msgs/day. Spammers are now sending 500 msg in a few minutes to my server to get the spam delivered before the spam databases are updated. The GBUdb system is perfect for handling this and provides a ready blocklist to be used. I think lots of Sniffer users would love to see this feature in IMail. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 RC1 to release version
Hi, Been on hold with the support desk for 34 min now, calling from The Netherlands :-( Maybe someone overhere knows the answer. ;-) About a month ago I installed IMAil 2006.21 RC1 on my production server as the 2006.2 version was not stable and I had some vacation coming up. It's been quite solid, so I've had a quiet vacation. But now I want to install th "real" version, the 2006.21 release version. When I run the setup I do not get the option to Upgrade as it sees itself installed. So what next? I can first Uninstall, and then install. Or I could do a repair. Would a repair be enough, would it overwrite every RC1 file with the release version file? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] Outsourcing Backup mail services
Hi, I don't know how others do it but MY backup mail provider simply does a check to see if the recipient is a valid e-mail adres. If they don't get an answer, for instance when my mailserver is down, they will accept all mail, otherwise only if the recipient is known. In my log I see short sessions like: 08:01 00:01 SMTPD(b11f01db6fbb) [217.114.99.201] connect 217.114.100.110 port 44191 08:01 00:01 SMTPD(b11f01db6fbb) [217.114.100.110] HELO mx2.virtu.nl 08:01 00:01 SMTPD(b11f01db6fbb) [217.114.100.110] MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08:01 00:01 SMTPD(b11f01db6fbb) [217.114.100.110] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> After that my server reports the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail address as valid or not. No "complicated" addresslist synchronisation is needed. In Declude I have the IP addresses for those backup mailservers in a skip list so all checks will be done as if that mailserver was never in the loop. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:55 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Outsourcing Backup mail services Hi >>Now-a-days its not recommended to setup a backup mail server unless its configured exactly like your primary server. That includes knowing what all valid addresses and aliases are, plus using the same black lists to reject connections. Are there any KB articles about how to do this with Imail? How do you automatically sync all the settings? Thanks Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Fusio.net Dublin, Ireland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Does not work either.
I'll send a mail to support with one of the mails.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 1:51 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi Bonno,
It shouldn't make a difference, but can you try replacing the space in the
rule with a period?
Tripp
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 4:59 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi Trpp,
Ok, but my last attempt does not work either so
From a recent mail, this is in the headers.
List-Id:
I want all those mails to end up in the folder "Other lists\OpenVpn-Users"
Currently the rule in my rules.ima file is:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
but that does not seem to work either. And as far as I know I've escaped any
{} () | * + , . : \ in the rule that need escaping
Wat also does not work, for different reasons is:
H~List-Id\:\ \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
This one should have worked I think, but didn't:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
What is the correct syntax? I'm about to give up and go back to
S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
The engine uses a standard regular expression parser so a '.' means match
any character in that position. If you want to match a period exactly, you have
to escape it.
Tripp
----- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Hmm, indeed the manual states I need to escape those periods but..
These two rules DO work:
H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude antivirus
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
Mails for both mailinglists are indeed moved to the right folder and the
periods are NOT escaped. I've just checked, there are no other rules moving
mail to these two folders. Also, in the local headers of a mail I find:
X-IMail-Rule: H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude
antivirus Data- LISTID.DECLUDE.VIRUS.-16710038
So that rule is indeed applied to move the mail to the proper folder.
Trip/Tom, any idea what's going on?
I'll adjust the rule for the Openvpn list once more, this time I'll try:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
I did not catch this before, you have periods, those have to be escaped.
H~List-Id\:
:Other lists\OpenVPN-Users
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 12:43 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Well,
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
dit not work. I'll try some else next. I'll try
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see if maybe I DID have to escape the brackets.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not
Re: [IMail Forum] Mail coming through secondary mailserver seems to be skipping AntiSpam filters
Hi, Tell Declude to skip the ip-number for the seconday mailserver in it's test. In Global.Cfg I have: # Bypass mx1, mx2 and mx3.virtu.nl IPBYPASS 217.114.97.3 IPBYPASS 217.114.97.6 IPBYPASS 213.129.65.196 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:06 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail coming through secondary mailserver seems to be skipping AntiSpam filters Hi I have recently added a secondary mailserver for all of the domains we host mail for at a separate physical location. It all seems to be working fine (we already had a 30 minute outage and it successfully spooled several thousand emails and then delivered them all within about 20 minutes once the main server came online) however we do have a problem with a huge increase in spam and having looked at the headers of some of them it seems that mail that is getting delivered through the secondary server is getting forwarded onto the primary server and is NOT being scanned for spam. I have checked our whitelist to ensure that the IP address of the secondary mailserver is not listed as a Trusted address. Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing this? Using Imail Server 2006 - Windows Server 2003. Thanks ___ Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Fusio.net To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi Trpp,
Ok, but my last attempt does not work either so
>From a recent mail, this is in the headers.
List-Id:
I want all those mails to end up in the folder "Other lists\OpenVpn-Users"
Currently the rule in my rules.ima file is:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
but that does not seem to work either. And as far as I know I've escaped any {}
() | * + , . : \ in the rule that need escaping
Wat also does not work, for different reasons is:
H~List-Id\:\ \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
This one should have worked I think, but didn't:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
What is the correct syntax? I'm about to give up and go back to
S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
The engine uses a standard regular expression parser so a '.' means match any
character in that position. If you want to match a period exactly, you have to
escape it.
Tripp
----- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Hmm, indeed the manual states I need to escape those periods but..
These two rules DO work:
H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude antivirus
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
Mails for both mailinglists are indeed moved to the right folder and the
periods are NOT escaped. I've just checked, there are no other rules moving
mail to these two folders. Also, in the local headers of a mail I find:
X-IMail-Rule: H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude
antivirus Data- LISTID.DECLUDE.VIRUS.-16710038
So that rule is indeed applied to move the mail to the proper folder.
Trip/Tom, any idea what's going on?
I'll adjust the rule for the Openvpn list once more, this time I'll try:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
I did not catch this before, you have periods, those have to be escaped.
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVPN-Users
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 12:43 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Well,
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
dit not work. I'll try some else next. I'll try
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see if maybe I DID have to escape the brackets.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
The on-line manual states:
Note: The following characters have special meaning in a rule: {} () |
* + , . : \If you want to use one of these characters in a search string,
precede it with a backslash. For example, to search for a plus sign, enter \+
in the search string.
So, escaping the space might have been the error in that rule. I
thought I needed tot escape the < and > because they now too have a special
meaning, the name of the rule. But, indeed tha manual does not say so.
I'll change the rule to
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see what that will do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Hmm, indeed the manual states I need to escape those periods but..
These two rules DO work:
H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude antivirus
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
Mails for both mailinglists are indeed moved to the right folder and the
periods are NOT escaped. I've just checked, there are no other rules moving
mail to these two folders. Also, in the local headers of a mail I find:
X-IMail-Rule: H~listid.declude.virus:Other lists\Declude
antivirus Data- LISTID.DECLUDE.VIRUS.-16710038
So that rule is indeed applied to move the mail to the proper folder.
Trip/Tom, any idea what's going on?
I'll adjust the rule for the Openvpn list once more, this time I'll try:
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
I did not catch this before, you have periods, those have to be escaped.
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVPN-Users
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 12:43 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Well,
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
dit not work. I'll try some else next. I'll try
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see if maybe I DID have to escape the brackets.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
The on-line manual states:
Note: The following characters have special meaning in a rule: {} () | * +
, . : \If you want to use one of these characters in a search string,
precede it with a backslash. For example, to search for a plus sign, enter \+
in the search string.
So, escaping the space might have been the error in that rule. I thought I
needed tot escape the < and > because they now too have a special meaning, the
name of the rule. But, indeed tha manual does not say so.
I'll change the rule to
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see what that will do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \ characters, do you?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Why does this rule not work:
H~List-Id\:\ \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars
This is part of the header of a message in that list:
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule:
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
does work properly. Header for such a message are:
X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net |
declude.com
List-Id:
X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to:
S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during
crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude
junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-1
Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Well,
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
dit not work. I'll try some else next. I'll try
H~List-Id\: \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see if maybe I DID have to escape the brackets.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
The on-line manual states:
Note: The following characters have special meaning in a rule: {} () | * + ,
. : \If you want to use one of these characters in a search string, precede
it with a backslash. For example, to search for a plus sign, enter \+ in the
search string.
So, escaping the space might have been the error in that rule. I thought I
needed tot escape the < and > because they now too have a special meaning, the
name of the rule. But, indeed tha manual does not say so.
I'll change the rule to
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see what that will do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \ characters, do you?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Why does this rule not work:
H~List-Id\:\ \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars
This is part of the header of a message in that list:
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule:
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
does work properly. Header for such a message are:
X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net |
declude.com
List-Id:
X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to:
S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during
crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude
junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
The on-line manual states:
Note: The following characters have special meaning in a rule: {} () | * + , .
: \If you want to use one of these characters in a search string, precede
it with a backslash. For example, to search for a plus sign, enter \+ in the
search string.
So, escaping the space might have been the error in that rule. I thought I
needed tot escape the < and > because they now too have a special meaning, the
name of the rule. But, indeed tha manual does not say so.
I'll change the rule to
H~List-Id\: :Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see what that will do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists)
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \ characters, do you?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Why does this rule not work:
H~List-Id\:\ \:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars
This is part of the header of a message in that list:
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule:
H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
does work properly. Header for such a message are:
X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net |
declude.com
List-Id:
X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to:
S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during
crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude
junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi, Why does this rule not work: H~List-Id\:\ \:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars This is part of the header of a message in that list: X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule: H~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail does work properly. Header for such a message are: X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net | declude.com List-Id: X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to: S~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] web messaging: Attempted to read or write protected memory.
Hi Ted, I thought this was solved in 2006.21 RC1 as I have not seen this error anymore after I applied 2006.21 RC1 and stopped my "three times a day restart" of the w3svc service. It's been running rather stable these past few weeks. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: tnichols To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] web messaging: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is an issue we are working on. Thus far there is no workaround we are aware of. If anyone is able to get a memory dump of this event, it would be a big help. Ted Nichols Ipswitch Messaging QA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:04 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] web messaging: Attempted to read or write protected memory. Once a week I users are unable to use web messaging and get the following error on screen: Unable to log into the system. Reason: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. Is there a diagnosis for this error or a workaround? I'd appreciate any help. I am running 2006.2 on win2003. I have .net2.0 installed and IIS is configured to use it. I must restart IIS to fix the error temporarily and have been unable to find a way to detect this error through scripting. Will To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Hi, I've had 2006.21 running on my server now as of last night and we use webmail A LOT. I have about 2000 users that use webmail. So far today 1500+ logins and no more errors without any restarts. :-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Grant Griffith To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:12 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare John, How long have you been running this version on the high volume server and what are you calling high volume? I really want to upgrade mine but was waiting on the released version. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000 -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:02 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Yes, when Imail 2006.2 was released and many started to use it, including installations on high volume or heavily used servers, the webmail bugs started to show themselves. As an example, I was running the preview for Imail 2006.2 on my server and had no errors or problems whatsoever. However my server is low volume. After its release, when I installed it on a high volume client server with users all over the place the problems arose. As of right now, Imail 2006.21 RC1 is installed on my server and on my client's high volume server and so far no errors have been seen or reported. The preferences.config file is in each users file directory and is used by webmail to set how the user wants certain things. If it does not exist, that means the user has never changed anything from default and that is fine, although in some cases having a preferences.config file even if everything is default settings has helped. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:25 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare This is a HUGE problem. I have a client with 800 accounts saying they're going to leave the platform because they're constantly getting logged out. I can't actually reproduce the probem here and am having a hard time tracking down their browser settings because they're across the country. Are there any temporary workarounds? What's the preferences.config fix? What is the ETA on 2006.21? I know it's in RC1 status, but we need it FAST FAST FAST! I really think Ipswitch should start publishing a KNOWN ISSUES list with every release, and constantly keep it updated as things arise. Forget scaring off potential customers, they WANT to see this stuff. Be more concerned with taking care of the many customers you already have! I looked through the forums and boards before upgrading to this version, which was released on March 6th I think, before upgrading our system. I saw a reference here and there, but it didn't sound like the widespread revolt that I'm experiencing! Thanks, One bloody and bruised IT guy -Original Message- From: "John T (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent 6/18/2007 5:16:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business.
Re: [IMail Forum] IMAP Performance
Hi, As far as I know it's an OE issue. I have it using several different IMAP servers. I also see strange behaviour that's probably related when accessing news servers within OE. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 2:18 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] IMAP Performance Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the performance of 2006.2 when used with IMAP and Outlook Express. We've been running a limited test of 2006.2 as a conversion from our old 7.15 server. Most of our clients use Outlook Express configured with IMAP, so that is our main concern. The one thing that I've noticed most is that 2006.2 is really slow to "wake up". That is, if I go to a computer than I haven't used in a while (say, overnight) and then launch OE, I get a long delay (with hourglass) before getting a message that the server can't be reached. Click OK, then refresh, and OE works fine. Or, I can short-cut the entire process by hitting escape (during the hourglass wait), clicking on another folder besides InBox, wait a few seconds, then click back to InBox. Once you start actively using email, then there is no problem with performance. However, it's that slow start that concerns me. It has to be something about the way the server sets up the connection, and how quickly it responds. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Ben BC Web
Re: [IMail Forum] bug renaming user in IMail 2006.2?
Hi, Where would I check that, in the same screen where I canged the user ID? I'm allready in contact with Ipswitch and they told me about that setting as well but I cannot find it anywhere. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Daniel Donnelly To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 3:36 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] bug renaming user in IMail 2006.2? Worked for me, using your username... Judging from the error message, my guess is that the 'Collaboration User' setting may have been disabled (or never set) and you checked the box to 'change the Collaboration user'. Try without enabling that checkbox and see what happens... Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 6:34 AM To: imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] bug renaming user in IMail 2006.2? Hi, Using IMail 2006.2 I wanted to try the feature to rename a user as there was a typo in the user when it was created. However, when I go to the webadmin, to the user properties and click on Rename User ID I can indeed enter a new user ID. I had b.boonstra_ and wanted to remove the underscore. After clicking on save I get: Error Message Colaboration user not found Have I found a bug, is this fixed in 2006.21? Or... am I doing something wrong, although I can't see what I could do wrong as there is only one entrybox for the new name and a save and cancel button. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] bug renaming user in IMail 2006.2?
Hi, Using IMail 2006.2 I wanted to try the feature to rename a user as there was a typo in the user when it was created. However, when I go to the webadmin, to the user properties and click on Rename User ID I can indeed enter a new user ID. I had b.boonstra_ and wanted to remove the underscore. After clicking on save I get: Error Message Colaboration user not found Have I found a bug, is this fixed in 2006.21? Or... am I doing something wrong, although I can't see what I could do wrong as there is only one entrybox for the new name and a save and cancel button. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL
Hi, The only reason to use a SQL database is when one wants to have the user data for other purposes as well. If one has a client database in SQL that is being used for other purposes like finance it might be advantageous to have IMail use the SQL database. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Dale McDiarmid To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:04 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL Hi... I'll be building a new server small corporate mail server with less than 500 users and a few lists. I'll allow POP and web access. Is it an advantage to go SQL or would the iMail default be fine. I've been running on default for over 10 years without issues. If we did go SQL I'd prefer Oracle, but would consider MS SQL Server or mySQL (if it's an option). Also, would SQL hamper or improve recovery? Any suggestions? Thx, D. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] opening mail error
Hi, We are running IMail 2006.2 and some people have problems reading the mail. What they tell me is that they can log in, can see the mail list but when they try to open a mail they end up at the login page. This problem started a few weeks ago it seems. Most people have no problems at all, some do. Anybody recognise this? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail Login Issue?
Hi, This is the infamous memeory leak error that is supposed to be fixed in the 2006.2.1 (aka 2006.21) fix Wait a few days/weeks and then install the stable version when it is released. I for one will be glad to have that update as we've been plagued by it A LOT. :-( Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Grant Griffith To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:49 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Webmail Login Issue? Anyone seen this error before? Error: Unable to log into the system. Reason: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. This is shown on the login form when someone tries to login to Webmail on IMail 2006.2. The hard drives had over 200gig free yet. NOTE: I turned off logging for the webmail and then everything worked as normal. The log file was 175meg, with other days being over 300meg each. Therefore should not of been an size issue? Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000
Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt
Hi John, You and I know that, but then again WE've been around the block a few times in this world. :-) Most new sysops of the "click-generation" are less savy. Also, if we're going that way, why the dot between 2006 and the rest of the number. ;-) Wohever... 2006.21 could be a normal version number. What will Ipswitch do later this year when after all the updates we DO get to the two digit minor version number. Will 2006.10 realy be minor version 10 or just good old 1.0 ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: John T (lists) To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt But when talking about computers, the order is 2 20 200 2006 2006.03 2006.04 2006.1 2006.2 2006.201 2006.21 2006.211 2006.2111 John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:55 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt HiTripp, Can you guys please adhere to standard major minor version notation? We in this community know that when you talk about 2006.21 you actually mean 2006.2.1 just like 2006.04 was 2006.0.4 and preceded 2006.1 But most people wont understand and will asume a natural version order is: 2006 2006.1 2006.2 2006.03 (and assume the extra 0 is just to get it at two digits) 2006.04 2006.21 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt We have fixed the insertion of the trailer.txt for 2006.21 which should be going into technical preview (beta) very soon. It is not configurable to the point that it will be ignored for certain lists. Tripp - Original Message - From: "Stefan Paege" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt > Hi, can someone from Ipswitch please tell me if (and when) the two issues > are corrected? > Especially #2 is a big problem for us. Trailer.txt is added even if the > list itself has its own Trailer message defined. > > Thanks > >> in Germany we are now forced by law to add certain company information to >> every business mail. Easy I thought, just use a trailer.txt file which >> includes that info. >> >> Two problems, though. >> 1.) It does not work for HTML-Mail. While we have the policy that all >> outgoing mail must be in plain text some users are still using HTML by >> accident/on purpose. >> >> 2.) We have some lists setup where the trailer.txt file should NOT be >> added. > > > -- > > > Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG > > Stefan Paege > > Fon: +49 5973 9497-23 > Fax: +49 5973 9497-19 > > > > > Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG > Kommanditgesellschaft:Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRA > 3310 > > Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Elektronik-Labor Carls, > Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt > HRB 4175 > > Geschäftsführer: Irmgard Carls, Joachim Schulte > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt
HiTripp, Can you guys please adhere to standard major minor version notation? We in this community know that when you talk about 2006.21 you actually mean 2006.2.1 just like 2006.04 was 2006.0.4 and preceded 2006.1 But most people wont understand and will asume a natural version order is: 2006 2006.1 2006.2 2006.03 (and assume the extra 0 is just to get it at two digits) 2006.04 2006.21 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt We have fixed the insertion of the trailer.txt for 2006.21 which should be going into technical preview (beta) very soon. It is not configurable to the point that it will be ignored for certain lists. Tripp - Original Message - From: "Stefan Paege" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt > Hi, can someone from Ipswitch please tell me if (and when) the two issues > are corrected? > Especially #2 is a big problem for us. Trailer.txt is added even if the > list itself has its own Trailer message defined. > > Thanks > >> in Germany we are now forced by law to add certain company information to >> every business mail. Easy I thought, just use a trailer.txt file which >> includes that info. >> >> Two problems, though. >> 1.) It does not work for HTML-Mail. While we have the policy that all >> outgoing mail must be in plain text some users are still using HTML by >> accident/on purpose. >> >> 2.) We have some lists setup where the trailer.txt file should NOT be >> added. > > > -- > > > Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG > > Stefan Paege > > Fon: +49 5973 9497-23 > Fax: +49 5973 9497-19 > > > > > Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG > Kommanditgesellschaft:Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRA > 3310 > > Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Elektronik-Labor Carls, > Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt > HRB 4175 > > Geschäftsführer: Irmgard Carls, Joachim Schulte > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] 8.2 to 2006.2 issues
Hi, Although the new webinterface is good and fast there are some issues. If you want to go to IMail 2006.2 primaily for the webinterface I would stay with 8.22 (with all hotfixes) for a while. Just got a updated DLL from Ipswitch last friday but that was a no go so they are still working on it. Not everyone seems to run into this problem but it has a major impact on the webinterface. I'm restarting it three times a day and even that sometimes isn't enough. :-( Once they lick this problem I would say yes go for it, it's feel a lot better then the 8.22 version, my users like the new interace. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Patrick Fowler To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:13 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] 8.2 to 2006.2 issues We are thinking of upgrading to the newest version of IMail soon. We are currently on ver 8.2. We have issues with Webmail and slowness with it. About 1000 - 1500 users use webmail as their primary email client. If we upgrade are there issues to be aware of? Will the new version help with our webmail issues and how many webmail clients can it handle at a time? Patrick Fowler, CCSP Extreme Network Associate # 10128 ShoreTel Certified Installer LAN/WAN - Email Administrator Laramie County School District #1
[IMail Forum] feature request rules screen
Hi, When we are talking about feature requests. Rules screen A link to the relevant part of the help about rules would be nice to have at the screen where rules are added/modified. And then especialy. Most important is that the exeptions, the "Note" section from the help, is explicitly posted there. Just about all questions I get about rules are about the special characters not handled they way people expect them to. Most of then never want to use the RegEx stuff but want to move list mail into a special folder or something like it. So for instance they want to select on subject contains [IMail Forum] and that does not work the way they expect it to. ;-) Of course other do want to use the regex stuff but don't know it's there. :-( Explicitly noting the exception chars at that screen might tell them enough to realise regex stuff does work. :-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] vacation message sent to...
Hi, I know how *I* can see it but can a user see it as well? As far as I know they cannot. Might be a nice option to have a link on the prefferences page, near the vacation messsage box, to that file when a vacation message is activated. For me I usually have a VNC session open to the mailserver so I can access the vacation.snt file directly. ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Dina Wise To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:41 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] vacation message sent to... In Web Admin, a.. go to User Admin, b.. select User, c.. Click on Vacation Message Link on left side, d.. then select Vacation Recipients Link which appears under Vacation Message If that user has a vacation.snt file, it will display here. Dina Wise QA Analyst, Messaging Team Ipswitch, Inc. -Original Message- From: "Bonno Bloksma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent 4/24/2007 10:36:53 AM To: imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] vacation message sent to... Hi, If I remember correctly one could see in IMail 8.x who had received a vacation messages, somehow the content of the vacation.snt file was viewable. I cannot fond this option in IMAil 2006.2. Am I missing something or am I misremembering something? If so, could this be a feature request? Should be simple, the logfiles are viewable as well so the basic code is already there. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] vacation message sent to...
Hi, If I remember correctly one could see in IMail 8.x who had received a vacation messages, somehow the content of the vacation.snt file was viewable. I cannot fond this option in IMAil 2006.2. Am I missing something or am I misremembering something? If so, could this be a feature request? Should be simple, the logfiles are viewable as well so the basic code is already there. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] Firewall solutions...
Hi, Yup, that's the way we do it overhere. At the main site where I host the mailserver, all the webservers, etc. I have a HP server running CentOS (Redhat Enterprise Linux without the logo's), the backup is a cheap clone PC with the same config. On error: Switch kabels, push power on button. ;-) Normally the backup machine is connected to my inner network, that way I can have it download patches etc to keep it up2date. I even have two different configs on the machine so it can be backup for two different firewall machines. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Dan Barker To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:31 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Firewall solutions... And, they are cheap enough, you can have a standby machine ready to go on a minute's notice. No service contract is ever that fast. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:56 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Firewall solutions... Linux + http://www.shorewall.net/ Easy and flexible! Great results so far. There must be many 1000s of free firewalls running on FreeBSD and Linux, with plenty of complete pkgs, how-to's, boot from cdrom/flash, no disk, etc, with all the major features of proprietary firewalls, and with many of the minor features. No annual hardware/software contracts in perpetuity, just another PC. Len
[IMail Forum] user settings, defaults, feature request?
Hi, In the Preferences screen are several users settings for which we would like to change the default, if possible on a per domain basis. For instance we would like for students NOT to save sent mail by default and purge deleted mail in stead of moving it to the Deleted folder. For our staff we would like to keep the settings as they are. I have not been able to find a screen where I can either change the current setting or the default. Am I missing something or have I just added something to the feature request list, or at least upped the priority? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 client login error
Hi, Tell Ipswitch about it. They are trying to find as many peoplewith this error as possible to find a common cause and thereby finding the root cause and it's sollution. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: florida.com To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 3:54 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 client login error ERROR: Unable to log into the system. Reason: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. --- Server seems to work fine-- except users get this error... After I reboot- it is fine---but it does reoccur.
Re: [IMail Forum] mail rules on CC field, feature request?
Hi,
Ok, the bugtraq list also uses the List-Id header. Thanks, I didn't know about
that one.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Dan Barker
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] mail rules on CC field, feature request?
Most email lists (this one excluded, ha!) insert some identifying headers
you can search. This forum uses a consistent FROM, but if present the extra
headers are a better sort target.
For example, the SpamAssassin users list includes:
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
List-Id:
in every message. Very easy to sort.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 11:40 AM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] mail rules on CC field, feature request?
Hi,
I have lot's of rules to sort out the mail that is coming in. One of the
problems I'm running into, and have been running in to in the past years, is
that fact the I can select on e-mail adresses in the To field but as far as I
know not on adresses in the CC field.
A lot of mail on the bugtraq lists comes via the CC and therefore is not
sorted. Other lists have the same problem. I'm not able to select on any other
string like the from or the subject like I'm able to do with other lists like
thisone where [IMail Forum] is part of the subject.
Am I missing something or have I found another feature request?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] mail rules on CC field, feature request?
Hi, I have lot's of rules to sort out the mail that is coming in. One of the problems I'm running into, and have been running in to in the past years, is that fact the I can select on e-mail adresses in the To field but as far as I know not on adresses in the CC field. A lot of mail on the bugtraq lists comes via the CC and therefore is not sorted. Other lists have the same problem. I'm not able to select on any other string like the from or the subject like I'm able to do with other lists like thisone where [IMail Forum] is part of the subject. Am I missing something or have I found another feature request? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] HTTP Failing on 2006.2?
Hi, I've had IMail 2006.2 in test for several weeks with a dozen users and we found no problem. It wasn't until we started using the webinterface with about 2000 users when suddenly problems started to appear. Kinda hard for Ipswitch to find problems no one knows about. :-( Unfortunately these problems are very hard to diagnose as all resources I have been tracking show now limit reached or something like it. Also the problem is a wierd one where parts will start to fail and other parts wil still work. A user can suddenly no longer send mail via the web interface, the error mesages refers to a socket failure. The rest of the webmail will work and normal SMTP, POP, IMAP etc will also work. On the server itself suddenly fileshares on other servers can no longer be reached, sniffer update (using wget) will fail, stuff like that. A while later the IClient webmail interface may no longer work but the IAdmin interface will still work, even when most things fail I can still reach the server and my monitoring tool can still log in to the server and restart the w3publ service. Try finding a common cause for those errors ans exceptions to see which resourse is the problem and THEN try to find the cause to depleting that resourse. It's not as easy as some people think it is, I wish it were. :-( For now I'm restarting the w3publ service on the Windows 2003 server three times a day. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Heimir Eidskrem To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] HTTP Failing on 2006.2? John T (lists) wrote: I and others have be patiently working on this problem and providing Ipswitch with information on what we have done. Unfortunately, a good amount of the work I have been doing troubleshooting with one user is now narrowed down to locally on her computer. What is important is to keep notes on what happens. I am seeing a small set of users logged in when this happens and I am trying to find what is common amongst them but different from all the other users that do not normally have problems. John T How about Ipswitch release a product that actually works. Its been almost a 1.5 years now since they launched 2006. Debugging should have been done a while back. When will this product be ready for production? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] HTTP Failing on 2006.2? Yes.. fails all the time.. and we get the xml parser error.. etc.. upon login with internet explorer. clear you browser cookies and log in again... same issue. I believe (hope) they are working on it. ~Rick -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:30 PM - MGMT To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] HTTP Failing on 2006.2? Anyone else having issues with HTTP failing? It seems like it is going down a couple of times a day since we upgraded to 2006.2. I have the service set to restart on a failure and it comes back up, but it kicks everyone off when this occurs. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Branding
Hi, Yes please. Had a user overhere getting worried as well. During login the titlebar showed "Tio webmail login" after login that changed to "Ipswitch Web Messaging" . She thought she had accidentally ended up on another site. ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Grant Griffith To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:01 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Branding Hello All, Is there a way to change what the tag says once the user is logged into Webmail? Currently it says Ipswitch Web Messaging. We would like to change that to be our company name instead. I am not finding it in any of the apsx pages. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions
Hi, Where would that information be then? I cannot find it. I too have tried to activate my installation several times when it turned out I was activated after all. ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Vincent Toussaint To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 3:22 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions Go to the Web Admin page and you'll know if your activation worked. ;) Let us know... Cheers! -- Vincent Toussaint Sys. Admin Hybride (www.hybride.com) -Original Message- From: Stefan Paege [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions Eric Parsons schrieb: > Finally got thru to CS at ipswitch, guy named boucher helped me out. He > clicked the ok button on the aladdin error and kept installing and then > activated after the installation. Everything seems to be running ok, this > server is not in production yet. I have to migrate the users and data to > the new box will get to that tonight. Thanks Eric, that's what I did, too. But, when running the activation after installation I got the same error again. Trying to activate for a third time I got a message about exceeding a certain limit of installations/activations. So I guess I'm activated :-) -- Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG Stefan Paege Fon: +49 5973 9497-23 Fax: +49 5973 9497-19 Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH & Co. KG Kommanditgesellschaft:Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRA 3310 Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Elektronik-Labor Carls, Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRB 4175 Geschäftsführerin: Irmgard Carls To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions
Hi, I had the default domain as a IMail INTERNAL domain. The user is then created in that domain and given the right privileges. This is just a IMail INTERNAL user, it has no relation to a Windows user. I don't know what needs to be done if the first domain is an external domain. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:36 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions OK, I'm satisfied with my first two questions, but I still have a problem with #3. I keep giving it existing legitimate user names with Admin authority, and the installation program keeps rejecting them. Someone else mentioned running into this problem; anyone know a solution? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: Bonno Bloksma To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 1:18 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions Hi, 1) I did the default install to C:\IMail with a domain I will not use. Declude had problems with the Default IMail directory. 2) After the initial install you can add any domain you want with the files for that domain at any location we want. I have two other domains on the server which we DO use and the root for those domains are D:\IMail_Domains\ 3) The user specified here is created as the first "user" and will get administrator priviliges within IMail. After you start the webadmin interface and log in with that user you can do most anything. However, as soon as you access the services tab you need to provide the credentials for a user with admin privilegs on the machine running the services. Normal rules for Windows auto login exist, so you may not have to provide these credentials. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 12:45 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions Hi, I'm feeling sort of stupid, but I'm having a tough time going through the basic decisions for installing 2006.2. We're upgrading from 7.15, which means it's been a long time since I've had to install IMail. The challenge here is that we are installing to a new machine (fresh install), with the idea that we'll move the domains and mailboxes over afterwards. So the install process keeps asking me questions, and I'm not sure of the differences from the old versions of IMail, and I can't find any answers in the Getting Started Guide or the Ipswitch website. Here are the questions I couldn't decide on: 1. Installation path. In the old installation, IMail went into a folder D:\IMail (which, may have been an upgrade from 4.x or 3.x) and all of the domains went under that folder. In the new 2006.2 installation, it wants to install in the more normal \program files\Ipswitch\messaging folder. I don't care if the program files go there, but I like the idea of keeping the domains and mailboxes in the \IMail folder. So do I just tell it to install to the default location, figuring that I'll be able to change the domain and mailbox locations later? Or do I tell it to install to \Imail? (Just for reference, this is all on the D: drive.) (For now, I've chosen D:\IMail) 2. User database. In the old 7.15 installation, we had one real domain, based on our NT user accounts, and then we had various virtual domains that used the IMail internal (registry) database. In the new installation, when I chose NT user accounts, it warned me against that (due to performance issues). Instead, it recommend using the Active Directory accounts. So I chose that, but am I correct in assuming that I will still be able to add virtual domains later that use the internal registry database? And what is the real difference (from an IMail administrator's point of view) between using the AD and the NT User accounts? Once I chose the AD user accounts, it gives me a long list of instructions about an account to be configured with the Framework 1.4. Among other things, it wanted me to setup impersonation but was really ambiguous on how to do that. I made my best guess, but more information would have been helpful. 3. Administrator account for web services. It asks for a pre-existing admin account to access administrative web services. I tried
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions
Hi, 1) I did the default install to C:\IMail with a domain I will not use. Declude had problems with the Default IMail directory. 2) After the initial install you can add any domain you want with the files for that domain at any location we want. I have two other domains on the server which we DO use and the root for those domains are D:\IMail_Domains\ 3) The user specified here is created as the first "user" and will get administrator priviliges within IMail. After you start the webadmin interface and log in with that user you can do most anything. However, as soon as you access the services tab you need to provide the credentials for a user with admin privilegs on the machine running the services. Normal rules for Windows auto login exist, so you may not have to provide these credentials. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 12:45 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 installation questions Hi, I'm feeling sort of stupid, but I'm having a tough time going through the basic decisions for installing 2006.2. We're upgrading from 7.15, which means it's been a long time since I've had to install IMail. The challenge here is that we are installing to a new machine (fresh install), with the idea that we'll move the domains and mailboxes over afterwards. So the install process keeps asking me questions, and I'm not sure of the differences from the old versions of IMail, and I can't find any answers in the Getting Started Guide or the Ipswitch website. Here are the questions I couldn't decide on: 1. Installation path. In the old installation, IMail went into a folder D:\IMail (which, may have been an upgrade from 4.x or 3.x) and all of the domains went under that folder. In the new 2006.2 installation, it wants to install in the more normal \program files\Ipswitch\messaging folder. I don't care if the program files go there, but I like the idea of keeping the domains and mailboxes in the \IMail folder. So do I just tell it to install to the default location, figuring that I'll be able to change the domain and mailbox locations later? Or do I tell it to install to \Imail? (Just for reference, this is all on the D: drive.) (For now, I've chosen D:\IMail) 2. User database. In the old 7.15 installation, we had one real domain, based on our NT user accounts, and then we had various virtual domains that used the IMail internal (registry) database. In the new installation, when I chose NT user accounts, it warned me against that (due to performance issues). Instead, it recommend using the Active Directory accounts. So I chose that, but am I correct in assuming that I will still be able to add virtual domains later that use the internal registry database? And what is the real difference (from an IMail administrator's point of view) between using the AD and the NT User accounts? Once I chose the AD user accounts, it gives me a long list of instructions about an account to be configured with the Framework 1.4. Among other things, it wanted me to setup impersonation but was really ambiguous on how to do that. I made my best guess, but more information would have been helpful. 3. Administrator account for web services. It asks for a pre-existing admin account to access administrative web services. I tried one of the AD administrator accounts (which doesn't seem appropriate anyway) and it said the account doesn't exist. I tried a local admin account (this server is a member server and not a controller on the domain) and it said that doesn't exist. In fact, I have yet to find an account that it will accept and this is where I am currently stuck. It would have been nice if there had been some documentation on the setup choices, but, lacking that, I'm hoping someone here can help. Thanks, Ben BC Web
[IMail Forum] domain
Hi, I have several ip-numbers on my mailserver. 217.114.99.201=mail.tio.nl 217.114.99.202=mail.student.tio.nl 217.114.99.203=mail.test.tio.nl I also have several domains on my server, tio.nl, student.tio.nl and test.tio.nl. So fas that all seems normal but When someone connects via SMTP to my server to 217.114.99.201 the server will report itself als: 220 tio.nl (IMail .) ... X1 Now is this correct as that is the DOMAIN or should it have said 220 mail.tio.nl (IMail.. ? A check for a PRT record wil fail as the tio.nl A record will point to our webserver. I can enter ONE name to use as helo name when sending mail but that would fail for the other domains. :-( How do you guys solve this? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 migrate or in-place upgrade and what's involved
Hi, See my mail a bit earlier in this area. Several mails in feb 2007. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 4:15 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 migrate or in-place upgrade and what's involved Hi, With the release of 2006.2, we're finally ready to upgrade. We've been waiting a long time, as shown by the fact that our old server runs 7.15. We have a new server ready to run 2006.2, and I can see two paths to take: 1. Copy over the existing 7.15 installation to the new machine, then install 2006.2 over it. 2. Do a fresh install of 2006.2 to the new machine, and then migrate the users. Path #2 is preferrable to two reasons: first, we've been running IMail a long time and the old server has a lot of legacy files and registry entries dating back to Version 4 or 3. So a clean start would be nice and might help to avoid future problems. Second, we would really prefer to move the domains over a few at a time, just to make sure everything is running smoothly. Moving everyone over at once is just asking for trouble in trumps. Path #1 is preferrable for one reason: I make sure that all of the users, their messages, settings, lists, etc. all get moved over correctly. I know that I can generate a list of domains and users to use with adduser.exe, but I don't know about actually moving their mail all over to the new system. Is there an easy or automated way to do that? Will it work to just copy over all of the mailbox files? And what about rules, lists, and other personalized items? I looked through the archives backwards and forwards, and although I saw a couple of questions along this line, I didn't see any detailed answers. Which path is preferrable? And if I follow Path #2, what is involved in migrating the domains, users, their mail, and everything else? Thanks, Ben BC Web
[IMail Forum] date in US format
Hi, In our webmail the date/time info is in US format eventhough every other setting on the server is for Dutch. Where can I set the date/time format to dd-mm-jj hh:mm, the current way is confusing. Most people realise that 1PM is 13:00 but if you see a mail with a date of 3/2/07 it's not realy clear whether this is March 2nd of February 3rd. Does IMail 2006.2 read the local config and is there another problem or did we forget to set something in a config file? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] searching who sent it
Hi, Using IMail 2006.2 on a Windows 2003 server A mail was sent using the account of a student but she claims she did not do it. So I've searched the logs and it seems the mail was entered via the webinterface. No strange thing as most of our students use the webinterface. But now I'm trying to match lines from the IIS log to the lines in the IMail log to see where the webmail came from. I'm unable to do so :-( I can find 4 login lines with that user account. The 1st at 10:34 form a IP-number 1, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th at 12:35, 12:36 and 12:36 from IP-number 2. Now I want to match the sent e-mail at 14:22 to either IP-1 or IP2 but I cannot find what to look for. Neither IP-1 or IP-2 show up in the timeframe The last entry for IP-1 is 10:35 The last entry for IP-2 is 13:36 Looking at these IMail log lines. What should I look for in the IIS log? 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) [217.114.99.202] connect 217.114.99.202 port 2646 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) [217.114.99.202] EHLO 217.114.99.202 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local. 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) [217.114.99.202] MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) [217.114.99.202] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02:23 14:22 SMTPD(ea8c01703abe) [217.114.99.202] C:\IMail\spool\Dea8c01703abe.SMD 76626 02:23 14:22 SMTP-(ea8c01703abe) processing C:\IMail\spool\qea8c01703abe.smd 02:23 14:22 SMTP-(ea8c01703abe) ldeliver tio.nl b.schreuders-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 76972 02:23 14:22 SMTP-(ea8c01703abe) finished C:\IMail\spool\qea8c01703abe.smd status=1 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] New Server + Upgrade
Hi, If you have no good reason not to, I would suggest just doing it the regular way. That would be install the identical version on the new server. Transfer the data and the registry info, make sure all is well and then upgrade. We... did it the other way because I have been upgrading since version 6.x. and wanted to create a clean environment. I installed 2006.2 on the new server, installed everything I needed and then created all the mailboxes. I could do that because I have all the mailboxnames and passwords in a database (the database for our intranet site) and could just use the adduser tool to recreate them. After that I transferred just the mailbox content to the new server and ran the tool to transfer the addresslists to the database. We ran into one problem though that's specific to the non english countries. Special characters like éáüö etc are not yet supported in the new IMail Admin interface. I hope Ipswitch will fix this asap. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Ing. Andrés E. Gallo To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:46 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] New Server + Upgrade Hi List! I am currently runnig IMAIL 8.20. But the new Server arrived, and I wonder if the best upgrade path is: A) Install 8.2 in New Server, then migrate users, later upgrade to 2006.2 or B) Install 2006.2 in the new server, then migrate users ( if possible! Where to find the upgrade notes? ). The Old Server, can not support IMIAL 2006 ( Old PIII - 800 512 Mb RAM ) Regards Andres.- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] bad socet state
Hi, User using the IMail 2006.2 webmail interface. Trying to send a message he gets: An error occured while atempting to send the message. Bad socket state. Is this an error on the client side or on the server side? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] transferring address books 8.22 to 2006.2
Hi, And what will happen if I run the tool for a second time? I had to add a few missing users and the wgscvt tool did not erase the existing aliasses.txt for the users it DID convert? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Jason Henline To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 3:25 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] transferring address books 8.22 to 2006.2 Hi Bonno, The following KB should have the information you need: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20060627-JH01.htm Note the latest wgscvt is included in your 2006.2 install. Jason H. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:43 AM To: IMail_Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] transferring address books 8.22 to 2006.2 Hi, We wil be transferring our mail environment next week to a new server. The old server is running 8.22, the new one 2006.2. As we have been upgrading as long a version 6.x we think it's time to do a clean install and transfer just the user data. In this case that means we we create empty mailboxes on the new server and just "dump" the mailbox files from the old server in them. Most students and teachers have no mailrules or stuff like that but.. the address books do have relevant data we want to transfer if possible. As the whole addressbook stuf has changed can anybody give me some pointers how to handle this? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] IMail 2006.x
Hi, Could not find anymore which IMail 8.x features are still missing from IMail 2006.2, nor do I know wheter this was part of the original webinterface as we extensively modified the original webinterface for our use. But 1) We used to have selection boxes in front of each mail in the list which could be ticked. Then people could select to delete the marked mails. Now we have to use the standard way to select multiple items in a list. In Windows one uses Ctrl+mouseklik and Shift+mouseclick. Funny thing is, other standard ways like Shift+curor key don't work, Don't know what Mac or Linux users use to select multiple items. Was the method with the selection boxes part of the original interface? Will that feature be introduced in the IMail 2006.x line webinterface? 2) We used to be able to specify how many mails we wanted to see in the list above the body of the selected mail. It seems I cannot set that number in the preferences screen. Right now I have 123 pages of 10 items each, I'd rather have a lot less pages with 20, 50 or a 100 items each. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] IMail 2006.2 and Safari
Hi, Had one user test IMail 2006.2 for me and he told me he cannot send html mail using the safari btrowser. Het get's an error "only plain text is supported by your browser" or something like it. With Firefox on the Mac the problem does not exist. Under known issues there is something about Safari: Safari: Web Client - When replying/forwarding HTML messages, all encoding/HTML tags in original message are displayed. Is this the same issue or have we stumbled onto something new? The issue about seeing the html code is indeed confirmed by him. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2
Hi, Hmmm, overhere IClient is indeed configured to use .NET 2.0.x but IAdmin is still configured to use .NET 1.1 So far I have not found any problems so probably this is correct but Kevin. The release notes under "IMail server 2006 features" talk about .NET 2.0 support for Web messaging, web administration and instant messaging. At the end under "Additional new features" the release notes for 2006.2 talk about web mail using .net 2.0 but don't mention web admin. Should IAdmin be configured for .NET 1.1 or 2.0? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: florida.com To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2 I also installed -- Had 2 problems but they were figured out 1. I had to change in iis>domain>iclient>asp.net to 2.0 2. i had to add user imail\aspnet to iis>domain>operators for one of my domains
Re: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out?
Hi, The 2006.1 to 2006.2 upgrade was a breeze but then we weren't realy using the 2006.1 installation. I just had it on the server to start installing stuff like Declude and then upgraded. Before it was just handling one mailbox, now there are about ten mailboxes on the server. Next week we'll do the transfer and then there will we about 2000 mailboxes on the server. Most users overhere use the webmail so we'll see how it handles under load. Should do fine, it's a new HP DL380G5. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 5:48 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out? OK then has anyone installed the update? How did it go? T -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:31 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out? Hi, Ipswitch has staged the launch of several products so they are not actively promoting it but. Go to the forums, to the imail preview forum. The link to the 2006.2 download is there. However, as I wrote, if you don't NEED it now they would rather have you wait in order not to overload their helpdesk. For us... I NEED to upgrade to my new server, the old one (the disks) is dying. And I don't want to test and release a server in production only to do another upgrade a few weeks later. Also, we use the webinterface A LOT and the fact that it no longer needs the IMAP service to access the mail is a big plus for us. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out? Did I miss something - is this out now? - Travis Rabe
Re: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out?
Hi, Ipswitch has staged the launch of several products so they are not actively promoting it but. Go to the forums, to the imail preview forum. The link to the 2006.2 download is there. However, as I wrote, if you don't NEED it now they would rather have you wait in order not to overload their helpdesk. For us... I NEED to upgrade to my new server, the old one (the disks) is dying. And I don't want to test and release a server in production only to do another upgrade a few weeks later. Also, we use the webinterface A LOT and the fact that it no longer needs the IMAP service to access the mail is a big plus for us. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 5:01 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Is 2006.2 Out? Did I miss something - is this out now? - Travis Rabe
[IMail Forum] transferring address books 8.22 to 2006.2
Hi, We wil be transferring our mail environment next week to a new server. The old server is running 8.22, the new one 2006.2. As we have been upgrading as long a version 6.x we think it's time to do a clean install and transfer just the user data. In this case that means we we create empty mailboxes on the new server and just "dump" the mailbox files from the old server in them. Most students and teachers have no mailrules or stuff like that but.. the address books do have relevant data we want to transfer if possible. As the whole addressbook stuf has changed can anybody give me some pointers how to handle this? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] Where is SpamContent
Hi, On my testserver (to go live as prod server in a few weeks) I have just installed 2006.2 It seems I still have some IMail spam filters active as one mail got caught by IMail as Spam. Where can I find this e-mail, is it cached somewhere or has it been deleted? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Postmaster To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:00 AM Subject: IMail Daily Report for testmail.tio.nl SpamContent1 LocalDeliver57
Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?
Hi, Great, I'm in the process of launching a new mailserver for my production environment en didn't want to wait, couldn't wait, until March. I'll just load up 2006.2 on my new prod server next week, which is now running my test domain, and take it from there. Question, In november I picked up de Single Sign On script Mike posted (as SSO_Post.ZIP) and we've been working with that. Will that still work with 2006.2 or wil the .Net 1.1 to .Net 2.0 change have an affect on this script as well. I don't think so but if anyone already knows for sure I'd like to know. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Kevin Gillis To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 6:08 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Hi Robert, for those not on an active SA, we'll be reaching out on the forums (web, email) and through emails and you will be able to access the build and the release notes, starting next week. bye for now, kg -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:49 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Hi Thanks for the consideration. For those of us on 2006, but no longer on a Service Agreement, what are the steps we'll need to take? Yours, Rob -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 6:38 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Hi All, Anyone running IMail 2006 or with an active Service Agreement is entitled to this release. Bye for now, kg -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 23:16 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Wow! My service agreement expires 2/21/2007, so I just miss it. How convenient. Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hi All, We are in final testing of 2006.2. We plan on going "gold" in the next week or so and releasing to public the first week of March. Current customers who want access to the "gold" build (when it's ready next week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum: http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31 If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you can access it below. Some of the new web messaging features include faster performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others. http://webdemo.ipswitch.com Un: demo1 Pw: ipswitch Bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Thanks everyone for the update. Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30 days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should be available in Feb. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Christopher Checca" To: Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2? Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com When should we expect ICS 2006.2? Anyone know? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.i
Fw: [IMail Forum] mail not shown
Hi, It's getting weirder. I've created a brand new test user [EMAIL PROTECTED] This user can log in, mail arives in the mailbox. At the top it says, "INBOX (1/1)" but no mail is shown. If I try to change a preference. -- you encounter this error again, please provide the following information to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting. Message: Access to the path "D:\IMail_Domains\test_tio_nl\Users\t.user\preferences.config" is denied. StackTrace: at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String str) at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, Boolean useAsync, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy) at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share) at System.Xml.XmlTextWriter..ctor(String filename, Encoding encoding) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.UserOptions.SaveXMLUserOptions(IUser user) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.UserOptions.lnkSave_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.ImageLinkButton.OnBtnLink_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.OnClick(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() -- The file does NOT exist. Owner of the folder D:\IMail_Domains\test_tio_nl\Users\t.user is: IUSR_ I give up. :-( Anybody? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Bonno Bloksma To: IMail_Forum Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:46 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] mail not shown Hi, I removed access for the "Users" group on the local server to D:\. I'm not sute if this has anything to do with that but.. I can log in as myself, I can use the mailserver via IMAP4, SMTP, etc. It's just the web interface I seem to have problems with. When I log in, at the top it will tell me I have 1100 messages. Those are messages that I have copied from my test mailserver which has been running IMail 2006.1 until this morning. However, no messages are shown. If I go to preferences and change my "messages per page" settings and hit Save I'll got.. -- If you encounter this error again, please provide the following information to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting. Message: Access to the path "D:\IMail_Domains\test_tio_nl\Users\b.bloksma\preferences.config" is denied. StackTrace: [.] -- After that I added the IUSR_ and IWAM_... users to have most rights (all but FC) to the D:\IMail_Domains directory which has the test_tio_nl directory as a child. Now I can save my preferences but... still no mail is shown. Mail wil be received correctly, I can access it via Outlook Express. The counter at the top wil change apropriatly when new mail comes in but... Maybe this is related to other problems when installing using IE7 on the server? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] mail not shown
Hi, I removed access for the "Users" group on the local server to D:\. I'm not sute if this has anything to do with that but.. I can log in as myself, I can use the mailserver via IMAP4, SMTP, etc. It's just the web interface I seem to have problems with. When I log in, at the top it will tell me I have 1100 messages. Those are messages that I have copied from my test mailserver which has been running IMail 2006.1 until this morning. However, no messages are shown. If I go to preferences and change my "messages per page" settings and hit Save I'll got.. -- If you encounter this error again, please provide the following information to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting. Message: Access to the path "D:\IMail_Domains\test_tio_nl\Users\b.bloksma\preferences.config" is denied. StackTrace: [.] -- After that I added the IUSR_ and IWAM_... users to have most rights (all but FC) to the D:\IMail_Domains directory which has the test_tio_nl directory as a child. Now I can save my preferences but... still no mail is shown. Mail wil be received correctly, I can access it via Outlook Express. The counter at the top wil change apropriatly when new mail comes in but... Maybe this is related to other problems when installing using IE7 on the server? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] installation glitch
Hi, Should this be in the FAQ somewhere? Or is it already there and did I read over it. Had some problems installing IMail 2006.1 on my new Windows 2003 server. >From the last time I remembered I needed to have at least Internet Explorer 6 to install the software so I knew the IE version might have something to do with it. I had IE 7 so that's "at least IE6". Installing the software as a user with Administrator priviliges on the machine gave me a warning I might not have enough rights to install the software. Duh? I then remembered the famous "Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration" that gets installed by default on all Windows 2003 servers. Lo an behold, after removing that nice piece of software I was able to install IMail. :-) Can't remember someone else writing about this overhere so I'll just mention it for the next person looking why IMail won't install. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] feature request
Hi, I know we can have a blacklist for ip-numbers in IMail. As far as I know this blacklist can, sort of, be populated, by IMail when to many invalid users errors happen during a session but.. My ISP has found a way to do user validation on the various backup mailservers for all the domains they are backup for, they simply set up a session to my server before the data part starts overthere and see if I want to accept the mail based on the sender and recipient info. If I refuse because of an invalid user then they wil refuse the mail as well. This is a nice way where there is no need to set up anything on the mailservers for which they are backup. If my server is down they will simply accept all mail. So for every mail they get with a non existent user they will try my server with that same user to see if the user exists. If I were to blacklist all servers attemting to deliver mail to non existent users I would blacklist them as well. I would need a whitelist overruling the blacklist. As fas as I know that feature is not in IMail, right? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] release date 2006.2?
Hi, Next week I'm going to order our new mailserver. When will 2006.2 be released? Before Christmas or should I just install 2006.1 with the .Net 1.1 and then later on upgrade to 2006.2 with .net 2.0? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] rights on new server
Hi, I will install a new WIndows 2003 server soon and install IMail 2006.1 on it. I'd like to reduce the default filesystem rights a bit by deleting the default rights "everyone" has to the root of each partition. Will all the correct rights be assigned when I first remove those rights, and then, as a local administrator, install IMail? Anyone done that? p.s. Any thoughts about which Windows 2003 version is better? Just standard Win2k3SP1 or should I go for the R2 version? Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW
Hi Andy, We even were considering scripting the "lower case translate" - but, "keyrename" is not a scriptable registry function. We certainly don't want tomanually perform all these edits while the services have to be down AND riskthat there'll be a certain percent of keyboard errors causing who-knows-whatkind of secondary problems. If you just export the Ipswitch key to a text file, do simple textbased case replacement and import it, that should not take to long. Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:45 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW KG>> Can you share what the main issues are that you'd like to see resolvedbefore upgrading to 2006.1? <Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOWDate: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:51:20 -0400Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comHi Darin,Can you share what the main issues are that you'd like to see resolvedbefore upgrading to 2006.1? Chances are that others may share similarsentiments and we'd like to prioritize and address them.Bye for now,kg To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?
Hi, Samen reason here for my whish to do a "clean" upgrade by just moving the domain info and the mailboxes. See my mail 19-okt. I'd love to hear from Kevin or Tripp whether my "solution" is feasable. Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Rick Hogue To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:17 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? I tried to upgrade to 2006 and spent a week fixing the mess. Ipswitch had to have some of the senior people to work with me to get things right and in the end we had to go back to 8.22 due to all of the problems we encountered. Mostly due to the fact we have been on the same program since before version 6 and all of the old skeletons came out to cause problems. Rick Hogue Intent.Net 1-800-866-2983 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin SchaibleSent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:13 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: AW: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? Hi, Not every customer of my company will move to IMail 2006. Some don't need or want the new gadgets, some don't want upgrade to a new server. Ipswitch should support IMail 8.22 until the end of next year. It can't be the truth, that a security hole is a reason to upgrade to the latest version. Other companies are supporting their older products too, like microsoft does. --Mit freundlichen GrüssenMerlin ConsultingMartin SchaibleBahnhofstrasse 27CH-8702 ZollikonPhone: +41 44 391 30 00Fax: +41 44 391 32 49Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.chSupport: http://support.merlinconsulting.chGPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226News - Neue Produkte:.:. mxGuard - InvURIBL - MessageSniffer.:. NOD32 Antivirus System.:. BlueDragon.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor.:. Paessler GmbH.:. SmarterTools Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Chris MoodyGesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2006 18:54An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comBetreff: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? I can't knock Ipswitch for not wanting to support a product indefinetly, but it seems like the pulled the plug on 8.x and 7.x rather soon. Even Microsoft support Win 98 until recently, and that is far more complex than Imail. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jim F.Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:45 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? >> The answer is obvious, time to drop Imail. << The only problem is that the alternatives aren't exactly that great. SmarterMail looks like a great product, but it's still lacking some of the fundamental elements of a corporate mail server like TLS. They also remind me now of how IPswitch was 5 or 6 years ago. I'm afraid that if I jump ship to SM, in a few years they'll start going down the same over-priced, feature-bloated, performance-lacking, unstability-ridden road that Ipswitch (and Declude) did. I've looked at the other alternative products and none are really that viable IMO. I would love it if there were a full featured Open Source mail server. Not that I am looking to save money - I'd just like to be able to use a product that is driven by functionality instead of the bean counters. FWIW, I didn't renew my IMail service agreement that expired a month or two ago. I'm not sure what I'm holding out for, but I don't want to feel like I'm being robbed by paying Ipswitch to use their product. That said, I'm not using a version with a vulnerability in it, but that shouldn't matter. If a vulnerability is discovered in any version of a piece of software, the vendor should provide a patch regardless of SA status. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyran OrmondSent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:17 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? On 05:41 PM 10/23/2006 -0400, it would appear that Mike N wrote: Now that there's been an SMTP exploit released (yesterday) for the recently patched SMTP bug, you are running on borrowed time until someone decides to try it on your server. Stay with possibly exploitable version of t
Re: [IMail Forum] move users to new server
Hi, Same "problem" here. I have a Windows 2000 box with IMail 8.2x and an old Declude version. I want to move to a new machine with Windows 2003 and I *don't* want to transfer old IMail settings. Just the mailboxes and the user settings. I want to have a "clean" (as clean as possible) setup on the new machine. I've done several upgrades and moves in the past but there was never such a big difference in the way IMail works. Usually I'd install the old version on the new box, do the transfer as per KB IM-19980116-JB11, and then upgrade the new box. I want to preserve the old box with the old software for a few days as a fall back in case something does not work. I'm testing the new software on a separate testbox and would like to copy all settings from that box to the new production machine which will run the same software. After that I want to move just the user settings and mailboxes to the new machine and be up and running. Maybe Trip Allen or Kevin Gillis can give us a few hints how to go about this. Seems like, if I copy the mailboxes and just the registry settings for HKLM\Software\Ipswitch\IMail\* to the new machine running the new version of IMail all should work. * being both the name and the ip-number for each domain. Kevin, Trip, how about it? Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Todd Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:10 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] move users to new server Thanks Markus. I was able to find that but I'm in the exact same boat as the original poster: - Currently on Imail 8.22 running Windows 2000 - Moving to Imail 2006.1 on a new (different) server running Windows 2003 I wasn't sure on the best practice either, whether it's best to start with a clean install of 2006.1 and transfer into that, or install 8.22 on the new 2003 server, transfer everything, then upgrade to 2006.1? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:58 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] move users to new server For such tasks it's always a good idea to consider the knowledge base: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-JB11.htm Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:58 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] move users to new server We are looking to do the exact same thing for about 70 domains (400 users), and are using the Imail DB. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:08 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] move users to new server What database do you have the domains configured to use? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stib > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:15 PM > To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com > Subject: [IMail Forum] move users to new server > > Hi again! > > I recently posted this message but didn´t recieve any respond, so I > give it > a new try. :) > > > > Does anyone havce a "guide" how to move all users from server A to the > newly installed Server B? > And just for making everything much harder it is different version on Imail > at the two servers. > Server A is running Windows 2000 and Imail 8,05 Server B is running > Windows 2003 and Imail 2006. (It CAN be reinstalled to > 8,05) > > We have many problem with the webmail on Server A, properbly caused by > chaning IP adress on the server far too many times. > Thats why we only want to move the USERS/Hosts and their mailboxes to > the new server, and not every setting. > > Regards Pelle > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://w
Re: [IMail Forum] Does this sound fair?
Hi, We have a test server now running IMail 2006.1 and Declude 4.3.7 with 2 virus scanners (3 including the built in one) and Sneffer as external SPAM filter. I haven't found any problems anymore so I guess we'll upgrade soon. Now all I need to find out about is how to do an upgrade and a transfer to a new server at the same time. But that's one for after my vacation. See ya in a few weeks. :-) Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Stephen Guluk To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:18 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Does this sound fair? How many people have yet to upgrade? I've not seen sufficient messages in this forum saying the iMail 2006 is as stable as my current version 8.22. The following is my response to an advertising email to renew my service agreement from ipswitch: To be honest, us loyal customers that extended our service agreements for another year but never got a full year of new working stable software should be compensated. I paid for iMail 2006 but never installed it because it has yet to reach stable levels. Personally I am very unhappy that ipswitch looked the other way and took our money without ever compensating anyone for the false advertising of a product as stable and ready for production when it was not We should all get another year of service contract without having to pay twice for what has not yet been provided... On Sep 20, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Yana Fookson wrote: Thank you for your email. There were various bugs in the IMail Server that was released in December of 2005. However the minor release of 2006.1 has been in development since last December, and was released early September 2006. This proves, and we are confident that this is a much more stable, reliable, user friendly version of IMail Server. What's been done to 2006.1: -Improved performance in the Queue Manager and Web Messaging, now up to 50% Faster - Added Active Directory support -Improvements to web messaging including personal groups, streamlined address book management and more -Improved public contacts list -Improved SMTPD performance and more I would recommend trying out a free trial evaluation of the IMail Server 2006.1 and see the difference for yourself. Please let me know if I can be of any further help! Thank you, Regards, Steve Guluk SGDesign (949) 661-9333 ICQ: 7230769
[IMail Forum] Dutch translation
Hi, We are thinking about translating the IMail 2006.1 interface into Dutch. Although some translations seem to be available, Dutch is not one of them yet. The way Ipswitch has set up IMail 2006 it seems our work won't be useless when newer versions become available. So it seems worth the effort. Anyone willing to share the cost/work? E-mail me or call me. Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelot 074 255 06 10 / f 074 255 06 16[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] mailing list not working
Hi, So far we have always used an alias for this as there were never more then a few dozen people who needed to get the mail but now there's a few hundred so. I need to create a mailing list. Created the list as I think it should but. mail comes in, get's accepted by IMail and then nothing. It's a private list which we will maintain by editing the users.lst and users.txt files via another program. For testing purpouses we have added two addresses via the IMail interface to make sure we have not made any syntax erros. Only subscribers are supposed to be able to post, noone is supposed to subscribe via a list command. User e.kanger is part of the list, user software is not. After the message is received on the server nothing seems to happen. Any idea what I need to look at? Here are a few piece of the logs C:\IMail\spool>grep "newyork" log0914.txt20060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.194] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>20060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.194] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C:\IMail\spool>grep "5a5d008849ee" log0914.txt20060914 153421 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.201] connect 217.114.99.194 port 245220060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.194] EHLO HGLSOFT0120060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local.20060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.194] MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>20060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.194] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>20060914 153422 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a5d008849ee) [217.114.99.194] C:\IMail\spool\D5a5d008849ee.SMD 209520060914 153454 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5a5d008849ee) processing C:\IMail\spool\Q5a5d008849ee.SMD20060914 153454 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5a5d008849ee) finished C:\IMail\spool\Q5a5d008849ee.SMD status=1 C:\IMail\spool>grep "5a5d008849ee" dec0914.log09/14/2006 15:34:54 Q5A5D008849EE Skipping E-mail from authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]; whitelisted. C:\IMail\spool>grep "5a70003949f6" log0914.txt20060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.201] connect 217.114.99.194 port 245720060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.194] HELO HGLSOFT0120060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.194] MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>20060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.194] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>20060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) [217.114.99.194] C:\IMail\spool\D5a70003949f6.SMD 208420060914 153440 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5a70003949f6) performing antispam checks20060914 153513 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5a70003949f6) processing C:\IMail\spool\Q5a70003949f6.SMD20060914 153513 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5a70003949f6) finished C:\IMail\spool\Q5a70003949f6.SMD status=1 C:\IMail\spool>grep "5a70003949f6" dec0914.log09/14/2006 15:35:13 Q5A70003949F6 WHITEIP:-12 CMDSPACE:8 . Total weight = -4.[]09/14/2006 15:35:13 Q5A70003949F6 Action(s) taken for [EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION="">09/14/2006 15:35:13 Q5A70003949F6 Cumulative action(s) taken on this email = IGNORE WARN [LAST ACTION=""> Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma
Re: [IMail Forum] Anti-Spam Prefixed Subject
Hi, We use Declude and we do a subject prefix [SPAM: xx] where xx is the number of points it scored. As Outlook Express is incapable of filtering on message headers other that the standard headers allready defined, this is the only way for people to filter these messages and put them asside. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "David Penrose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:17 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Anti-Spam Prefixed Subject I would appreciate getting a general sense of what others are doing with the "Prefix Subject with" property of the anti-spam filters of Imail. We are presently prefixing subjects of email that are flagged in the filters with "[SPAM-]", where is the type of filter. We get some complaints from users that do not want to see this prefix. Are others using or not using this prefix? Thanks. _ David Penrose To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem
Hi, If I remember correctly Outlook 98 was a free upgrade to Outlook 97 or nearly free and it does support SMTP AUTH. I have upgraded several Windows 98 SE machines with Outlook 97 installs to Outlook 98 because of that. Not sure if you can still get licenses for Outlook 98, probably not. :-( Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Greg Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:52 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem SMTP Auth would be great, but I have several machines Win98Se with Office 97 and no to upgrade. Yes, he was at camp using webmail not outlook. I will check my DNS. Thanks, Greg -Original Message- From: Adam Campbell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:47 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem No A or MX record in DNS? You said he's away. Have him use SMTP Auth. adamc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 09:31 To: 'Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com' Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem Thanks Adam. Does anyone have a clue why the message fail active validation on my own server? Greg -Original Message- From: Adam Campbell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:23 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem 07:17 16:17 SMTPD(f06f013117dc) [0365] VALIDATION: (HELO) bcooper domain failed active validation adamc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 08:56 To: 'Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com' Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem Now with the header information. Good Catch. I did not think of including the header. Thanks, Greg Header Received: from bcooper [66.66.98.165] by mail.catalystems.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A0730194; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:17:55 -0400 From: "bill cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Greg Lane'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: X-IMail-SPAM-Connection RE: Today's sales Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0007_01C6A9BB.145E4A20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO: (f06f013117dc) X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: R X-IMail-Rule: S~X-IMail-SPAM-Connection:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Data- X-IMAIL-SPAM-CONNECTION RE: T X-UIDL: 452557316 X-IMail-ThreadID: f06f013117dc -Original Message- From: Matrosity Hosting [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] X-Header Spam Connection Problem << File: ATT00023.html >> I may be blind but did you provide header info? Greg Shepherd wrote: I am having a problem with my boss sending emails through the Web Mail (Remotely from Camp) to staff in house. I do not see where the X Header - Spam for Connection is coming from Any help would be great appreciated. Logs are attached... Sys Log 20060717 161751 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [192.168.11.3] connect 66.66.98.165 port 33250 20060717 161751 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] EHLO bcooper 20060717 161751 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20060717 161751 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20060717 161755 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20060717 161755 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20060717 161755 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) [66.66.98.165] D:\IMail\spool\Df06f013117dc.SMD 7365 20060717 161755 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f06f013117dc) performing antispam checks 20060717 161756 127.0.0.1 SMTP (f06f013117dc) processing D:\IMail\spool\Qf06f013117dc.SMD 20060717 161757 127.0.0.1 SMTP (f06f013117dc) Inbound X-IMail-Rule: S~X-IMail-SPAM-Connection:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Data- X-IMAIL-SPAM-CONNECTION RE: T 20060717 161757 127.0.0.1 SMTP (f06f013117dc) ldeliver mail.catalystems.com spam-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7432 20060717 161757 127.0.0.1 SMTP (f06f013117dc) finished D:\IMail\spool\Qf06f013117dc.SMD status=1 Anti Spam Log 07:17 16:17 SMTPD(f06f013117dc) [0365] BLACKLIST: connecting to service (SpamCop:*:bl.spamcop.net) 07:17 16:17 SMTPD(f06f013117dc) [0365] BLACKLIST: 66
Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??
Hi Kevin, Next week I'm going to set up our test server. Can I then download the 2006.1 versien even if it is beta/gamma? I'd like to approach the version I'll be installing end of Juli on the production server as best as I can. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Kevin Gillis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:13 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05?? hi chris, we are in final testing now and released to the Preview Users today. general availability is still being set. we have focused on quality and improving the installation/iis/active dir configuration. here's a short list of what's included in 2006.1? 1) several updates to the web messaging ==>ability to create personal group lists in the web messaging including drag n drop features when managing groups ==>auto add recipients to address book ==>link to web calendar ==>disk space indicator ==>remember un/pw when logging in ==>persistent branding changes when doing updates 2) AntiSpam ==> major upgrade to the mail-filters premium anti-spam (catches gif/jpg based spam, can set spam signature update frequency, up to 25-35% faster) and other updates. 3) several defect fixes (including auth issue in SMTP and VDomains and host admins being able to configure user disk space) and updates including an installation checker to make sure you have all the prerequisites before installing bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Checca Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:24 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05?? Does anyone know when ICS 2006.05 is coming out? I like to plan the upgrade from 8.22 to 2006.05. Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Single Account - Multiple Users
Hi, This is a Outlook Express bug which also surfaces when just ONE persone/computer is accessing the IMAP folder. It is also sort off present when using OE to access news servers. When not using OE for a number of minutes and then cliking on a folder it wil instantly claim there is no connection, right after that there is a connection and mail can be seen/read/marked/etc. Somehow OE also sometimes cannot access a mail the first time it tries to get it from the server. My feeling has always been that it's related to the other item. The problem with this bug is that OE will mark somewhere for itself that it could not download the message and will refuse to do so in the future. Funny thing is If you trie to MOVE the message, for instance from the IMAP inbox foldetr to the Local Folders Inbox, it will happily do so, getting the message from the server and putting it in the local folder. :-( Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Gordon Waters To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:33 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Single Account - Multiple Users Hi ,I have a situation where I have 4 people accessing a single IMAP Account, My Clients are running outlook express, and are starting to have issues with messages being no longer available on the server, I feel that this is a client issue, (http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20010601-DM01.htm) and was wondering if any of you have a similar need, in which you have a single account being accessed by more that one client, and what mail client you might recommend.I have set all the client to sync only headers and know that none of them are deleting the messages.ThanksGordonTo Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/---[E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus]
[IMail Forum] test IMail 2006, upgrade later this year
Hi, I will be setting up a test server for IMail 2006.03 this week, or next week. We will do several tests to see if it intigrates with our website etc. In the summer, when most of our students are away from school I will buy a new server, set up the then latest IMail on it and want to transfer the test domein form the test server and the live staf and student domains from the IMail 8.22 server to the new server. I have transferred IMail from one server to another several times, allways did it with the proven way to first have the same version on both servers and then transfer the data. However, this summer my new server will be running the latest Windows, IMail, Declude, etc and I don't want to install an old version first. I'd rather not install a major upgrade on my old server if that is not needed. Also I'll need to transfer my test domain to the new test server without installing an old IMail version first next week. Is there a KB article describing this situation? I haven't found it. :-( Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?
Hi, [] Oh yes, another feature "lost" in this upgrade is the graphic display of disk usage/available for the client. Gone. Users do not know when they are near capacity any longer, with the exception of using the Full Mailbox Notification. The disk usage graphic was a very useful tool that just disappeared. Oop, that's a feature we would realy WANT to have back. We have a lot of students that have mailboxes near the limit. They "constanly" need to know when they are too close to th elimit. Kevin, is it on the list already to be re-added? Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue
Hi, My boss has a blackberry and all mail: 1) Is completely base64, even if it's plain text 2) Has a plain text signature ending normally defined at the provider website 3) Has a few extra bytes with random chars *after* the signature Don't know if that is because of an error at the provider (Vodafone NL) or a blackberry problem. Nor wheter it has any relation to your problem. But maybe it get you thinking in the right direction. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Kevin Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue Does anyone have any insight into this Blackberry issue. To recap: bodies are stripped from any message sent from a Blackberry device UNLESS that message has an attachment (then the body is displayed correctly). Below is a log snippet of an email with no attachment. It appears OK to me. Thanks. Kevin Rogers wrote: Here is the log snippet. I don't have the actual email file at this point, but I will have the user who received the blank email send it to me. I did read at the Ipswitch online forums about someone who had the same problem (they said that it happened with any email *without* an attachment for some odd reason), but no one had responded to him. Here's the log. Any help would be appreciated. 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [192.168.0.3] connect 204.107.47.175 port 1053 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] EHLO hnt02.healthnet.com 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] C:\IMail\spool\Daad801a21470.SMD 3861 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) performing antispam checks 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) processing C:\IMail\spool\Qaad801a21470.SMD 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) ldeliver Rogersbenefit.com someone-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4399 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) finished C:\IMail\spool\Qaad801a21470.SMD status=1 Matti Haack wrote: Matti Haack wrote: What do you mean by the source? The log entries? The email itself (the .eml file)? As much information as possible... Logs and the mail itself would be helpful... Matti - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung, Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde. Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche, die aufgrund der Kommunikation per E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver
Hi Kevin, For us it's just 1 and 4 We don't have lists people can subscribe to, we manage it for them. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: Kevin Gillis To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:57 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver hi bill, thanks. this is more market research than anything and we can't tackle all of these but curious what folks have a preference/priority: 1. ability to add/delete single user to/from multiple lists simultaneously 2. double opt-in/opt-out 3. bounce mgt 4. ability to add/delete multiple users to/from single list simultaneously 5. customizing signatures per list 6. other - please explain bye for now, kg -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:39 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver[Kevin Gillis] Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] yeahKevin Gillis wrote: hi bill, so on bounce (or x bounces), auto remove from list? bye for now, kg -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:01 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver[Kevin Gillis] Matrosity Hosting [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] bounce management would be at the top of our list.Thanks,BillKevin Gillis wrote: Hello Ben, thanks for your feedback. would it be possible to provide a top 3 lists of features you are looking for in the listserver? bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Imail Admin Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:03 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver Amazing. It's like buying a new Lexus hybrid and then discovering it only has an AM radio with one in-dash speaker. Ben - Original Message - From: "Eric Shanbrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:57 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver still the same. Eric S - Original Message - From: "IMail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:40 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver Hi, It just struck me: can someone tell me how the list server is IMail 2006 compares to the list server in prior versions? Are needs for a list server have always been modest, so it was never worth it for us to invest in a separate, more powerful program. On the other hand, IMail's list server has always primitive, and we're always wished they would upgrade it. Hence my question. Thanks, Ben BC Web To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] central changing webmail settings
Hi, I seem to remember there was a discussion about this a while ago. I cannot remember whether that was initiated by me nor what the result of that was. Neither can I find any messages about it, so We have decided that we want to have a new default setting for deleting mail in the webinterface. Of course each individual can set this for his or herself however Most wil for whatever reason not do so until told over and over again. Therefore 1) Is it possible to set default webmail settings for new users using IMail 8.22? 2) If not, is it possible using IMail 2006.03? 3) If not, wil it be possible in the near future? Probably need kg to answer this one... 4) Is it possible to change specific webmail settings for current users using IMail 8.22? 5) If not, is it possible using IMail 2006.03? 6) If not, wil it be possible in the near future? Probably need kg to answer this one... As to 1) and 4), I have not found any way yet so it's probably a no to those two items. But as to 2, 3, 5 and 6. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma
Re: [IMail Forum] Imail mail box size limit
Hi Travis,
Outlook 2000 and 2002 hit a hard limit at 2.0 GB.
Right as they use *ONE* large file to store everything.
Outlook 2003 If you convert the PST file to the 2003 version can go
apparently to 4GB.
Ok, still ONE PST file. I thought Outlook 2003 was smarter. I thought it was
using the Outlook Express MBX stucture.
Outlook Express (although never tested) hits its hard workable limit at
2GB as well.
Nope it doesn't. Outlook Express uses one file per mailbox folder. So it
can store max 2GB per folder. I have several users going over the GB limit,
one approaching 10GB. He has been using Outlook Express in stead of Outlook
for over a year now.
Have a look at the
"C:\D&S\\Loc.Settings\App.Data\Identities\{..id..}\Microsoft\Outlook
Express" folder. In that folder are seperate MBX files for each e-mail
folder. IMAP folders are prepended with the name of the account given in de
account general screen.
Gordon wrote:
I am facing the opposite situation - I am in a corporate environment,
and having that much email on a users local PC, that is not backed up or
lost if the PC crashes. At least with the IMAP accounts, I can backup it
up.
The same goes for us. If a PC dies or mail is lost for whatever reason we
still have a backup of that mail. We also have close to 2000 students using
the webmail interface to access their mail. That mail wil be backed-up as
well.
Groetjes,
Bonno Bloksma
---
[E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Imail mail box size limit
Hi, I have a couple of IMAP mailboxes that are 2.1Gb in size (yes I know way to big), some of my users are using Outlook express to access there imap account (on a local LAN), and OE is starting to have an issue reading the BIG mailbox. I am in the process of pruning / deleting / moving messages from that mail box, But does OE or IMAP have a mailbox size limit that it can work with. Im running Imail 8.22 on a W2k server formated with NTFS My top 10 users (including me are) 19.7 GB 23.5 GB 31.8 GB 41.8 GB 51.7 GB 61.4 GB 71.2 GB 8900 MB 9853 MB 10 840 MB None of us are having problems as long as.. the mailbox is divided in plenty of smaller chunks. Each (sub) folder is a mbx file on the server and on the client. These should never approach the 2GB limit. Other then that I have not seen any problems. Lot's of these large boxes are being used by people NOT on the local LAN. However, we do use 8Mbit ADSL lines at our remote sites and the main site has a private dark fiber with 100Mbit converters on it to the NDIX, which is less then 10 miles away from that site.. :-) Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP error
Hi, Found that key when I took a look at that part of the registry. ;-) Funny this isn't part of the HKLM\Software\Ipswitch\Imail key hive. There is another KB article which states that all we need to do to transfer to a backup mailserver is to have the (identical) software, the mailboxes and the IMail key hive. That specific article then seems to be in error as part of the settings are in the key below. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:41 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Bonno, To force authentication, set the value ForceAuthOnExtraPort =1 on the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters. Mike - Original Message - From: "Bonno Bloksma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:17 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Hi Travis, I have read the BK article about IMail 8.2x but that only talks about adding the port, not about forcing auth on it. Or maybe the article isn't written clearly enough. It states: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters. To enable SMTP to listen on an alternate port, set the data for EnableExtraPort to 1. The default alternate port is 587 (as recommended by RFC 2476), but if you wish, you can specify a different port by changing the data for ExtraPort. Be sure to enter the new port number in decimal and not hexadecimal. So that is how one creates another port. But it does not specify whether this is a auth only port. As a matter of fact the next part suggests that we need to set that somewehere else: Once you have forced authenticated on the alternate port, until the email client successfully authenticates, IMail will only accept the following commands: So somehow one needs to force auth on that extra port as well. However this KB article does not specify where that information can be found. :-( Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:47 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Exactly! In iMail 2006 use the following - the GUI sets these values. EnableExtraPort=1 ExtraPort=587 ForceAuthOnExtraPort=1 If you want to force auth, otherwise leave 0 In 8.2x here is your KB article: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20050428-DM01.htm - Travis Rabe -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Lemke Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:31 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Is this as simple as flipping the bit on EnableExtraPort in the registry? Matt -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:26 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Yes, if it is version 8.2x or Imail 2006.X - Travis Rabe -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Lemke Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:12 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Travis, Can Imail listen on both ports 25 and 587 simultaneously? Thanks Matt -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:07 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Version 8.2x and 2006.0X will allow her to use port 587 as well. Just configure it on up in Imail. - Travis Rabe -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elliott Bujan Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:00 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error I'm suspecting it is because I don't see her hitting our firewall and not even our server. I will check with her isp. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:45 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE:
Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP error
Hi Travis, I have read the BK article about IMail 8.2x but that only talks about adding the port, not about forcing auth on it. Or maybe the article isn't written clearly enough. It states:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters.To enable SMTP to listen on an alternate port, set the data for EnableExtraPort to 1. The default alternate port is 587 (as recommended by RFC 2476), but if you wish, you can specify a different port by changing the data for ExtraPort. Be sure to enter the new port number in decimal and not hexadecimal. So that is how one creates another port. But it does not specify whether this is a auth only port. As a matter of fact the next part suggests that we need to set that somewehere else: Once you have forced authenticated on the alternate port, until the email client successfully authenticates, IMail will only accept the following commands:So somehow one needs to force auth on that extra port as well. However this KB article does not specify where that information can be found. :-( Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:47 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Exactly! In iMail 2006 use the following the GUI sets these values. EnableExtraPort=1 ExtraPort=587 ForceAuthOnExtraPort=1 If you want to force auth, otherwise leave 0 In 8.2x here is your KB article: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20050428-DM01.htm - Travis Rabe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt LemkeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:31 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Is this as simple as flipping the bit on EnableExtraPort in the registry? Matt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis RabeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:26 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Yes, if it is version 8.2x or Imail 2006.X - Travis Rabe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt LemkeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:12 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Travis, Can Imail listen on both ports 25 and 587 simultaneously? Thanks Matt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis RabeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:07 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Version 8.2x and 2006.0X will allow her to use port 587 as well. Just configure it on up in Imail. - Travis Rabe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elliott BujanSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:00 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error I'm suspecting it is because I don't see her hitting our firewall and not even our server. I will check with her isp. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis RabeSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:45 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP error Is her Port 25 blocked? - Travis Rabe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elliott BujanSent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:38 AMTo: imail_forumSubject: [IMail Forum] SMTP error One of our users is trying to connect via smtp w/outlook 2000 and it's getting this: 09:46:04: (Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity.) What can be happening? she can connect to pop3. I don't have any entries in imail's log either. I only see pop3 entries but no smtp. Elliott Bujan Initial Tropical Plants voice: (847) 634 4250 ext. 99281
Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
Hi, There's no requirement that the storage mechanism that IMail uses should be understandable by anything other than an IMail process. That would be great if the "the storage mechanism that IMail uses" has no other impact. However, by now two incidents hare occured where the new mechanism has some impact. A mail archiving tool and a virusscanner. Both finding mails that should no longer be there. They are both looking at an internal structure the format of which may be changed at each new relaease. Right. So when that happens I will have to look into it. What I am asking for is in line with your suggestion, that only IMail now how things work, I would then like IMail to have a mechanism to circumvent the impact of the changes made. In my case a way to force purging a mailbox. And what if the next release compresses each message in the mailbox? Are you then going to ask for an option to not compress it? Maybe, if THAT is the only way I can detect virusses still present in a mailbox and it is considered a functionality we do not want to do without I might request it. On the other hand, I might ask f-prot to not only understand encoded files in e-mails but to also understand compressed IMail mailboxes. Of course, if Ipswitch decides to use a standard compression format like RAR or ZIP I would not even have to ask f-prot for any extra functionality as it allready understands those formats. Your suggestion would be the same like "nothing needs to understand the filesytem but the OS". That's great as long as the OS has ALL the toold needed for both normal operations as well as problem situations. As we both know that is not the case there are multiple tools that understand what a FAT, NTFS, etc filesystem is. The tools either use defined APIs or need to be upgraded whenever the structure of the filesystem changes. Your complaint about IMail is like complaining that Microsoft implementing NTFS makes your old Norton DOS Utilities no longer work. Fortunately new tools came available, so that would be equivalent to the new version of f-prot finding virusses in the new IMail mailboxes. If those new tools for the NTFS system would not have come, there would have been huge pressure on Microsoft to make those tools available. You should be complaining to the implementors of your mail archiving tool and virus scanner, not to Ipswitch. Of course that is one way. However, my feature request was there for two reaons, one was the request to have the purging be done during off-hours that way keeping the purge actions during businesshours to a minimum. It just happened to coincide with my other need for the deleted mails to be gone. As to Mhonarc, it may have to switch to using IMAP to access the mailbox in the future when the next "problem" arises. As the webmail seems to have done that as well it may turn out to be the new "window into the mailbox" in the future. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
Hi, Might I put in a feature request? I have problems with deleted mail still showing up as well. In my case it's with f-prot scanning all mailboxes and finding virusses in mails which have allready been deleted but not yet purged. There's no requirement that the storage mechanism that IMail uses should be understandable by anything other than an IMail process. That would be great if the "the storage mechanism that IMail uses" has no other impact. However, by now two incidents hare occured where the new mechanism has some impact. A mail archiving tool and a virusscanner. Both finding mails that should no longer be there. What I am asking for is in line with your suggestion, that only IMail now how things work, I would then like IMail to have a mechanism to circumvent the impact of the changes made. In my case a way to force purging a mailbox. Your suggestion would be the same like "nothing needs to understand the filesytem but the OS". That's great as long as the OS has ALL the toold needed for both normal operations as well as problem situations. As we both know that is not the case there are multiple tools that understand what a FAT, NTFS, etc filesystem is. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
Hi Tripp, I read the KB article, my mail was in response to a message from you in this forum where you pointed to that article. However, my problem with that solution is, I want to do the purging during off-hours. So I would like to have to 10% limit in operation for normal hours but would like to have the option to force purging the mailfolders during the night. As some people overhere have mailboxes wel over 2GB and some individual mail folders over 1GB you can see what will happen if suddenly IMail decides it's time to purge one of those folders. :-( For those four folders with a virus in them... it is also a problem for ME to purge the mail during off-hours. I can set the secified key but then I have get into those mail folders and delete one mail. As I don't have all the passwords but ok, for those 4 mailboxes I can ask the password, hope they will give it to me, and then log in to their account in the evening. About your comment We do not recommend running an AV scanner on a mailbox. I have f-prot run the weekly scan in reporting mode only. I were not to do that how would I ever find those virusses that still reside in a mailbox? Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:06 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail You can follow the instructions in this KB article to turn off compression so mail will be immediately purged when it's deleted: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20040412-DM02.htm. We do not recommend running an AV scanner on a mailbox. Tripp - Original Message - From: "Bonno Bloksma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail Hi Tripp, You wrote: The messages starting with a Might I put in a feature request? I have problems with deleted mail still showing up as well. In my case it's with f-prot scanning all mailboxes and finding virusses in mails which have allready been deleted but not yet purged. We use IMAP a lot and I have f-prot scan all mailboxes once a week to report on virusses in mailboxes which went through at a time the virus scanners did not recognise the virus yet. For a while now I have 4 mailboxes which still have a virus in a mail which is allready deleted. But, because that specific folder in the mailbox never get's more deleted mails, these few mails don't get deleted as well. They therefore keep showing up in my weekly scan and each time I have to make sure the reported virusses are indeed the ones in the deleted mails. I would verry much like a feature to force purging of all deleted mails, either per mailbox or per domain. I could live with a button in the IMail administrator, or what came in it's place. But maybe a command or a commandline option so I can script it for the middle of the night might be prefferable. As IMAP get's used more and more and people start storing mail more, we will have more folders where mail almost never gets deleted, so I assume this problem will only increase. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
Hi Tripp, You wrote: The messages starting with a Might I put in a feature request? I have problems with deleted mail still showing up as well. In my case it's with f-prot scanning all mailboxes and finding virusses in mails which have allready been deleted but not yet purged. We use IMAP a lot and I have f-prot scan all mailboxes once a week to report on virusses in mailboxes which went through at a time the virus scanners did not recognise the virus yet. For a while now I have 4 mailboxes which still have a virus in a mail which is allready deleted. But, because that specific folder in the mailbox never get's more deleted mails, these few mails don't get deleted as well. They therefore keep showing up in my weekly scan and each time I have to make sure the reported virusses are indeed the ones in the deleted mails. I would verry much like a feature to force purging of all deleted mails, either per mailbox or per domain. I could live with a button in the IMail administrator, or what came in it's place. But maybe a command or a commandline option so I can script it for the middle of the night might be prefferable. As IMAP get's used more and more and people start storing mail more, we will have more folders where mail almost never gets deleted, so I assume this problem will only increase. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Blacklisted by Imail "feature"
Hi, I don't think that is possible but I would like to know how other mailservers are handling this. Will I see a receive line like Received: from ACSW01 [192.168.100.113] by mail.americancaresource.com (SMTPD-8.22) id A1E5016C; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:52:05 -0600 and then the line above it might have nothing to do with americancaresource.com at all, the mail will just magically have been transported from americancaresource.com to the domain of the ISP? Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: Dave Doherty To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 6:16 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Blacklisted by Imail "feature" Hi, all- Running Imail 8.15 here, but this applies to many other versions. I have recently been blacklisted by CBL and Comcast as a result of a feature that appears to be unique to IMail. It seems that there is some way in which, for outgoing mail, Imail identifies itself as "mail." followed by whatever domain originates the email. Since I have several hundred domains, that means the server identifies itself as several hundred domains, all at one IP address. To uneducated recipients, this looks like a spam generator. Several other users on the Declude list report similar problems. Is there a way to shut off this function so the server always identifies itself with the official host name? -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc.
Re: [IMail Forum] IMAP4 attack!!!
Hi, There is a bug in the IMAP protocol in the 8.0x series for which a fix was never released. The fix was only created for the 8.1x and 8.2x releases. Be aware there ARE exploits in the wild taking advantage of this bug. We ran into them as well and as we need IMAP4 I had to upgrade to 8.2x. So your options are limited to either disable IMAP if that is feasable for you or either upgrade to 8.22. See my mails in this list with subject "IMAP service stopping" See also http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/400543 Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: Periklis Drakos To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:19 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] IMAP4 attack!!! Hello guys Couple of hours ago my Imap4 service hit 100% CPU I was suspected hack attack I stoped the service.. every went back to normal...except the high network flows I observe...Am I compromised? Any suggestions welcome!! Runing IMAIL 8.05 HF3 in windows 2003 standard Thanks Periklis Drakos
[IMail Forum] reg keys
Hi, Looking at my IMail registry tree I see these keys. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\7.01] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\7.07] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\8.0] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\8.01] @="" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\8.03] @="" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\8.05] @="" However, I'm allready at 8.22, with at least 8.21 in between. But there are no keys for those versions. Should they be there, should I preserve these old keys or can I delete them? There is a version key under the Global key. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Ipswitch\IMail\Global] "Version"="8.22" Did this replace the old keys? Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] copy to action
Hi, We want to keep track of all mail from our students to the staff and vice versa. All mail where the sender is part of student.tio.nl and any one of the recipients (To, CC or BCC) is in tio.nl then a copy needs to be sent to a special mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same for mail coming from tio.nl where any recipient is in student.tio.nl needs to be sent to another special mailbox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course the copied mail by the action itself should not be copied to that mailbox, otherwise I'll have a nice loop. :-( Of course I don't want spam to be copied, define spam as any mail that meets my deleteweight (SPAMDELETE tag). Of course I don't want virsses to be copied (but I'm using Declude Virus and AVAFTERJM is nowhere in my configs). How do I set this up? I'll probably need JunkmailPro (I've got Junkmail Standard) or can I do this with standard IMail (v8.22) rules? p.s. Still using Declude 2.06 but I'll switch to 3.x when I'll upgrade my mailserver to IMail 9 next year. I could upgrade Declude to 3.x if needed. Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
