Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Grant Ingersoll]

+1

On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:


OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Michael McCandless]

OK I've generated them manually, and I'll go open an issue to do some
ant magic :)

Mike

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Mark Miller  wrote:
> I ran into the same thing - its supposed to, but it no longer seems to.
>
> We are doing a hack do to some issue that appears to be resolved in ant
> - I think we can switch it to just use the hash task.
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>> Eek, I don't know!  For some reason "ant dist" didn't generate them.
>> I'll dig & post them.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>>
>>> Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts?
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>>
>>>
 OK, let's try this again!

 I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
 branch), here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

 Changes are here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

 Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
 Java 2.9.1.

 Mike

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Mark Miller]

I ran into the same thing - its supposed to, but it no longer seems to.

We are doing a hack do to some issue that appears to be resolved in ant
- I think we can switch it to just use the hash task.

Michael McCandless wrote:
> Eek, I don't know!  For some reason "ant dist" didn't generate them.
> I'll dig & post them.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>   
>> Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts?
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> OK, let's try this again!
>>>
>>> I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
>>> branch), here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
>>>
>>> Changes are here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/
>>>
>>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>>> Java 2.9.1.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>   
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>> 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>   


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Michael McCandless]

Eek, I don't know!  For some reason "ant dist" didn't generate them.
I'll dig & post them.

Mike

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts?
>
> On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> OK, let's try this again!
>>
>> I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
>> branch), here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
>>
>> Changes are here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/
>>
>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>> Java 2.9.1.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Grant Ingersoll]

Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts?

On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:


OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Karl Wettin]

+1

30 okt 2009 kl. 00.27 skrev Michael McCandless:


OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Ryan McKinley]

+1

Tested (via solr 1.4.0 RC) and everything seems good


On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:


On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless
 wrote:

OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.


+1

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Yonik Seeley]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless
 wrote:
> OK, let's try this again!
>
> I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
> branch), here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
>
> Changes are here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/
>
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> Java 2.9.1.

+1

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Michael Busch]

+1

 Michael

On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:

OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Robert Muir]

+1 my chinese corpus indexed fine this time :)

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> OK, let's try this again!
>
> I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
> branch), here:
>
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
>
> Changes are here:
>
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/
>
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> Java 2.9.1.
>
> Mike
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Erik Hatcher]

+1

On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote:



OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

[Michael McCandless]

OK, let's try this again!

I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Mark Miller]

I'm back porting now.

Michael McCandless wrote:
> OK I haven't started yet... would be good to get it in.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Mark Miller  wrote:
>   
>> The Highlighter issue could go - I just have to review it a bit more
>> though ... don't wait if its not there before you start.
>>
>> Michael McCandless wrote:
>> 
>>> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
>>> we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
>>> new RC...
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>> OK I'll spin a new RC.
>>>>
>>>> I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark 
>>>> (LUCENE-1994).
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
>>>>> LUCENE-2002.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>>>>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>>>>>>> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changes are here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>>>>>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>>>>>>> Java 2.9.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Robert Muir
>>>>>> rcm...@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>> 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>   


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Michael McCandless]

OK I haven't started yet... would be good to get it in.

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Mark Miller  wrote:
> The Highlighter issue could go - I just have to review it a bit more
> though ... don't wait if its not there before you start.
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
>> we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
>> new RC...
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> OK I'll spin a new RC.
>>>
>>> I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark (LUCENE-1994).
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
>>>> LUCENE-2002.
>>>>
>>>> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>>>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>>>>>> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>>
>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes are here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>>
>>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>>>>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>>>>>> Java 2.9.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Robert Muir
>>>>> rcm...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Michael McCandless]

Didn't start yet, and I just committed this!  Thanks Robert.

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Robert Muir  wrote:
> if you havent already started, i found a minor problem in the smartcn public
> javadocs while updating it to generics. here is a patch for 29 branch
>
> Index:
> contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
> ===
> ---
> contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
> (revision 831005)
> +++
> contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
> (working copy)
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>  import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.CharType;
>  import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.Utility;
>  import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.WordType;
> -import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.PathNode;//javadoc @link
> +import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.SegToken;//javadoc @link
>
>  /**
>   * Finds the optimal segmentation of a sentence into Chinese words
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
>    }
>
>    /**
> -   * Return a list of {...@link PathNode} representing the best segmentation
> of a sentence
> +   * Return a list of {...@link SegToken} representing the best segmentation
> of a sentence
>     * @param sentence input sentence
>     * @return best segmentation as a {...@link List}
>     */
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael McCandless
>  wrote:
>>
>> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
>> we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
>> new RC...
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
>>  wrote:
>> > OK I'll spin a new RC.
>> >
>> > I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark
>> > (LUCENE-1994).
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> >> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
>> >> LUCENE-2002.
>> >>
>> >> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> -Original Message-
>> >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>> >>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>> >>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>> >>> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Changes are here:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>> >>>
>> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>> >>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>> >>> > Java 2.9.1.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Mike
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -
>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Robert Muir
>> >>> rcm...@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Muir
> rcm...@gmail.com
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Robert Muir]

if you havent already started, i found a minor problem in the smartcn public
javadocs while updating it to generics. here is a patch for 29 branch

Index:
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
===
---
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
(revision 831005)
+++
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
(working copy)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.CharType;
 import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.Utility;
 import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.WordType;
-import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.PathNode;//javadoc @link
+import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.SegToken;//javadoc @link

 /**
  * Finds the optimal segmentation of a sentence into Chinese words
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
   }

   /**
-   * Return a list of {...@link PathNode} representing the best segmentation
of a sentence
+   * Return a list of {...@link SegToken} representing the best segmentation
of a sentence
* @param sentence input sentence
* @return best segmentation as a {...@link List}
*/


On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
> we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
> new RC...
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
>  wrote:
> > OK I'll spin a new RC.
> >
> > I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark
> (LUCENE-1994).
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> >> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
> >> LUCENE-2002.
> >>
> >> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
> >>
> >> -
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
> >>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
> >>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
> >>> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
> >>> >
> >>> >  
> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging->
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Changes are here:
> >>> >
> >>> >  
> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging->
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
> >>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> >>> > Java 2.9.1.
> >>> >
> >>> > Mike
> >>> >
> >>> > -
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Robert Muir
> >>> rcm...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Mark Miller]

The Highlighter issue could go - I just have to review it a bit more
though ... don't wait if its not there before you start.

Michael McCandless wrote:
> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
> we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
> new RC...
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
>  wrote:
>   
>> OK I'll spin a new RC.
>>
>> I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark (LUCENE-1994).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> 
>>> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
>>> LUCENE-2002.
>>>
>>> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>>>
>>> -
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>> -----Original Message-
>>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>>>>> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>   
>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>>>> 
>>>>> Changes are here:
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>>>>   
>>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>>>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>>>> 
>>>>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>>>>> Java 2.9.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>> --
>>>> Robert Muir
>>>> rcm...@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>   


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Michael McCandless]

So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch.  Any other issues
we want to back port?  If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
new RC...

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
 wrote:
> OK I'll spin a new RC.
>
> I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark (LUCENE-1994).
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
>> LUCENE-2002.
>>
>> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>>
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>>> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>>> >
>>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>>> >
>>> > Changes are here:
>>> >
>>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>>> >
>>> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>>> > Java 2.9.1.
>>> >
>>> > Mike
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert Muir
>>> rcm...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Michael McCandless]

OK I'll spin a new RC.

I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark (LUCENE-1994).

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
> LUCENE-2002.
>
> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>> >
>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
>> >
>> > Changes are here:
>> >
>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
>> >
>> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>> > Java 2.9.1.
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Robert Muir
>> rcm...@gmail.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Uwe Schindler]

Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
LUCENE-2002.

So I changed my mind: -1 :(

-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de


> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
> >
> > Changes are here:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
> >
> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> > Java 2.9.1.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Robert Muir
> rcm...@gmail.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Robert Muir]

+1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
>
> Changes are here:
>
>  
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/
>
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> Java 2.9.1.
>
> Mike
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Erik Hatcher]

+1


On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:


+1

On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:


OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:

http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Uwe Schindler]

> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
> 
> Changes are here:
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/
> 
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> Java 2.9.1.

+1

I tested the lucene-core.jar artifact also with my current 2.9.0 project and
worked without recompilation. CheckIndex after optimizing shows 2.9.1 as
version. Also JavaDocs look better than 2.9.0 and the changes for 3.0
(undeprecations) are implemented.

I verified that the nasty BooleanQuery bug is fine now and therefore will
set the update now to production :-)

Everything else looks like Mark's 2.9.0 release. Nice work!

Uwe


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Mark Miller]

+1

Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
>> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
>>
>> Changes are here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/
>>
>>
>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
>> Java 2.9.1.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Grant Ingersoll]

+1

On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:


OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

 http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

[Michael McCandless]

OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

[Uwe Schindler]

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
>  wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> >> Looks good. One thing:
> >>
> >> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev
> in the
> >> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with
> having
> >> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin
> from
> >> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official
> build.
> >
> > Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is
> > the way we should keep it.
> 
> +1
> 
> So this means in general when doing the release, we leave the -dev in
> there?  Ie, leaving the -dev doesn't affect the binary release (which
> gets its version, eg in the JAR's manifest, from the -Dversion=2.9.1
> on the ant command line), I think?

Exactly!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

[Michael McCandless]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> Looks good. One thing:
>>
>> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
>> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
>> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from
>> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build.
>
> Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is
> the way we should keep it.

+1

So this means in general when doing the release, we leave the -dev in
there?  Ie, leaving the -dev doesn't affect the binary release (which
gets its version, eg in the JAR's manifest, from the -Dversion=2.9.1
on the ant command line), I think?

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

[Yonik Seeley]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> Looks good. One thing:
>
> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from
> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build.

Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is
the way we should keep it.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

[Uwe Schindler]

Looks good. One thing:

In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
-dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from
the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build.

Any comments about this?:

I found something in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973 that
may need un-deprecation. Can you and Mark Miller also look into it?

I find the method is very useful to prevent users from creating
TopFieldDocCollector manually, what produced lots of confusion about the
parameters of the static ctor (have to ask the weight for it..., hard to
explain for someone, who only wants scores for sorted results).

Uwe

-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de


> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 5:18 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1
> 
> OK, I've built release artifacts from svn rev 829846 (on the 2.9
> branch), here:
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1/
> 
> Changes are here:
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1changes/
> 
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> Java 2.9.1.
> 
> Mike
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

[Michael McCandless]

OK, I've built release artifacts from svn rev 829846 (on the 2.9
branch), here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1/

Changes are here:

  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1changes/

Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
Java 2.9.1.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org