[jQuery] new forums used?

2010-01-18 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi there,

I just noticed this group is still having lots of activity.  I for one
am very pleased to see we're moving to actual forum on
forum.jquery.com, but it appears that moderation isn't done there yet
(or I'm just too impatient...)

Are we supposed to continue posting here, or was my first idea right
to start using the new forum?


Thanks so much for a fantastic library, great support, and a
marvellous spirit :)

David.


[jQuery] Re: new forums used?

2010-01-18 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
well, for starters the fact that Google does not accept my emails to
the list, een though I'm subscribed, so for some reason it forces me
to go to groups.google.com to submit any messages I'd like to submit,
which to be honest has limited my contribution on the list to just
some questions helping me, and noty contributing to solutions to other
people's problems.

Secondly - I prefer not to have too many email arriving; I prefer the
pull mechanism where I decide to go read on the forum; I always have
the feeling that mailing lists just push you with the info.

And thirdly - the new forums look great :D

Either way - from what I've read the list IS gonna disappear and IS
gonna be replaced by the new forum; just not clear to me whether we're
supposed to write here, or use the new forums now...

Thanks!
David.

On 18 jan, 16:03, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
 Hi, David...

 What do you find more appealing about forums than an email list?

 Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On

 Behalf Of speedpac...@gmail.com
 Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 9:50 AM
 To: jQuery (English)
 Subject: [jQuery] new forums used?

 Hi there,

 I just noticed this group is still having lots of activity.  I for one am
 very pleased to see we're moving to actual forum on forum.jquery.com, but it
 appears that moderation isn't done there yet (or I'm just too impatient...)

 Are we supposed to continue posting here, or was my first idea right to
 start using the new forum?

 Thanks so much for a fantastic library, great support, and a marvellous
 spirit :)

 David.


[jQuery] [apycom Menu] Submenu items showing as top level items in IE

2010-01-10 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi,

I'm using the (paid) version of Apycom's jQuery menu; you can find it
at http://apycom.com/ and it is looking really good.

I have uploaded files, and published it on a test site - www.flexin.be

Unfortunately, some of the submenus (starting from the second that has
children elements), it adds the item on the top level in Internet
Explorer.

Does anyone on this list has any experience with this library?  Is it
a known issue?  Any idea on how I can fix it?

thanks so much in advance for any feedback!


Kind regards
David.


[jQuery] Re: live event with instant execution

2009-12-26 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi,

What you say is exactly what the alternative would be.
Just you have better insight of what is needed...

I have a class tip_class.  Each element that has this class needs to
have a tooltip initiated.
What I do when the page is loaded, is indeed loop through all elements
that have this class, and execute the flexinInitialiseElement method
which does indeed create the tooltip when the element has this class
(or does other initialisations, based on the classes added to the
element...)

I'm using jqGrid (http://www.trirand.com/jqgridwiki/doku.php), and one
of the columns in the grid basically is a list of icons with a link
for each action that can be performed on the object associated with
the record in the grid.

This works good, and the code is something liks:

a href=linkimg src=url class=tipcaption/a

I need javascript to be executed on these elements, without the need
for me to explicitely write it or call the flexinInitialiseElement
method upon refreshing the grid's content.
Basically, the classes should be the driver for executing
initialisation code, which I hoped I could achieve with the live
option...

Does this make myself more clear? :)

David.

On 25 dec, 20:07, Šime Vidas sime.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
 The load event wont help you... it has to do with stuff having
 finished loading, but you are creating new elements based on an AJAX
 response, so the new elements are not being loaded at all.

 Well, you can allways initialize the elements after you create
 them I can't see the problem 

 For example.

 1. you get the AJAX response

 2. you create new elements

 3. you initialize them


[jQuery] Re: live event with instant execution

2009-12-25 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Basically execute additional javascript code based on a classname
adding functionality to these elements...
I tried the following, but it doesn't seem to be working...

jQuery('*').load(function () {
// run code
console.log(DEBUG: Initialising element  + jQuery(this));
flexinInitialiseElement(jQuery(this), false);
});

This piece of code is added to the top of the page, so I would have
expected each DOM element to be passed to the flexinInitialiseElement
method, but it doesn't...

Thanks for the much appreciated feedback on this great Christmas
day :)

David.



On 24 dec, 14:14, Šime Vidas sime.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What does initiating elements mean?


[jQuery] live event with instant execution

2009-12-24 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi,

I do have elements which are being initiated when dom is ready based
on css selectors.  this works like a charm, and when the dom is ready,
I have a function which initialises all elements in the dom based on
the selectors.

The page however also comes with quite some ajax which inserts new
elements, and I want these elements to be initialised as well.

I have read about the live event, but it appears to be requiring
another event where the behaviour will finally be attached to.

Is there a way to pass new elements to a function which is responsible
for the initialisation thereof without the need of relying on an even
other than the fact that it is created?  (or simply put: why isn't
there an event onCreate :) )

I hope someone is able to help me with this...

Thanks!
David.


[jQuery] Re: live event with instant execution

2009-12-24 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hmm - not sure if correct, but would the load event be the one I
should be looking at?
Sorry for answering my own question, but if someone could confirm, i
would feel a lot better ;)

David.

On 24 dec, 11:28, speedpac...@gmail.com speedpac...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi,

 I do have elements which are being initiated when dom is ready based
 on css selectors.  this works like a charm, and when the dom is ready,
 I have a function which initialises all elements in the dom based on
 the selectors.

 The page however also comes with quite some ajax which inserts new
 elements, and I want these elements to be initialised as well.

 I have read about the live event, but it appears to be requiring
 another event where the behaviour will finally be attached to.

 Is there a way to pass new elements to a function which is responsible
 for the initialisation thereof without the need of relying on an even
 other than the fact that it is created?  (or simply put: why isn't
 there an event onCreate :) )

 I hope someone is able to help me with this...

 Thanks!
 David.


[jQuery] Re: google.load issue

2009-12-24 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi Mike,

Sorry for the late response, but thanks a lot for this feedback.  It
does indeed help.
I'm only a bit disappointed that I now have 4 scriptgoogle.load()/
script blocks :)

thanks a lot though!
David.

On 17 dec, 03:08, Michael Geary m...@mg.to wrote:
 Put your lines of code in separate script tags.

 google.load() uses document.write() to write a script tag into the
 document. This script tag is not executed until the current script tag
 exits. So your jQuery.noConflict() call is being executed before jQuery is
 loaded.

 If you break up the script tags like this, it should work fine:

 script type=text/javascript
 google.load(jquery, 1);
 /script

 script type=text/javascript
 jQuery.noConflict();
 google.load(prototype, 1);
 /script

 -Mike

 On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:58 AM, speedpac...@gmail.com 

 speedpac...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,

  For obvious reasons, we try using Google to load javascript libraries
  when we need them.
  We already used Prototype using google.load() function, and now we
  decided to add jQuery as well since we will be using some jQuery UI
  widgets to speed up development on a project (more specifically we
  need a decent date selector!

  Basically, what we did is:

  google.load(jquery, 1);
  jQuery.noConflict();
  google.load(prototype, 1);

  Unfortunately, for some reason, it complains that noConflict() is no
  method leading me to believe tha the jQuery code isn't loaded properly
  prior to calling the noConflict() method...

  We have never had such an issue in the past, and if we link directly
  to the .js file hosted on google servers without using the google.load
  () method, it works fine as well...

  Does anyone know this is a known issue when working with google.load
  ()?

  Since we manage the needed libraries through a database, and use the
  google.load() function for all these libraries, it would be a shame if
  we need to include jQuery library directly without using the
  google.load() method :)

  thanks in advance for your very much appreciated feedback!

  David.


[jQuery] google.load issue

2009-12-16 Thread speedpac...@gmail.com
Hi,

For obvious reasons, we try using Google to load javascript libraries
when we need them.
We already used Prototype using google.load() function, and now we
decided to add jQuery as well since we will be using some jQuery UI
widgets to speed up development on a project (more specifically we
need a decent date selector!

Basically, what we did is:

google.load(jquery, 1);
jQuery.noConflict();
google.load(prototype, 1);

Unfortunately, for some reason, it complains that noConflict() is no
method leading me to believe tha the jQuery code isn't loaded properly
prior to calling the noConflict() method...

We have never had such an issue in the past, and if we link directly
to the .js file hosted on google servers without using the google.load
() method, it works fine as well...

Does anyone know this is a known issue when working with google.load
()?

Since we manage the needed libraries through a database, and use the
google.load() function for all these libraries, it would be a shame if
we need to include jQuery library directly without using the
google.load() method :)

thanks in advance for your very much appreciated feedback!

David.