Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Stacey

Jesse Stay wrote:

This is actually what concerns me about my daughter's school.  She's a
first grader and they want to post her and her classmates' (w/ naive
parents permission, of course) pictures and names along with progress
info on a website, no login or anything to protect that info.  It
scares me that any weirdo out there can then view my daughter's
picture, know her name, and what school she goes to.  I think we are
often not careful enough about what we allow others to display on the
web.

If it were behind a password-protected site, then maybe it would be
another thing.  Sorry - just ranting about a recent frustration with
the schools here in Utah.


The school district here in Texas sends a letter out with the student ID 
number (used for the login name) and a randomly generated password.  
Everything is password protected.  There are no pictures of students or 
even their name on the web site.  Just their student ID number.   
Someone actually thought about this it seems or, maybe, they actually 
read some of the emails I sent.  :)


FYI, in case everyone didn't see this on slashdot...  Ross Anderson's 
excellent security engineering book is now on-line:  See 
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.html


or download the entire thing at:

http://rapidshare.de/files/31139575/security_engineering.pdf.html
http://www.filewire.com/download.php?id=5ead2cad1c6cb101e336dc0
http://www.zshare.net/download/security_engineering-pdf.html

-stacey.
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Jesse Stay

Thanks to the student progress system
our school district is using I know if there is a problem with one of my
kids before the report cards come out.   Also, teachers are not spending
a good deal of their time talking to the parents but rather they are
spending more of their time, well hopefully, teaching.


This is actually what concerns me about my daughter's school.  She's a
first grader and they want to post her and her classmates' (w/ naive
parents permission, of course) pictures and names along with progress
info on a website, no login or anything to protect that info.  It
scares me that any weirdo out there can then view my daughter's
picture, know her name, and what school she goes to.  I think we are
often not careful enough about what we allow others to display on the
web.

If it were behind a password-protected site, then maybe it would be
another thing.  Sorry - just ranting about a recent frustration with
the schools here in Utah.

Jesse

--

#!/usr/bin/perl
$^=q;@!>~|{>krw>yn{u<$$ 0gFzD gD, 00Fz,
0,,( 0hF 0g)F/=, 0> "L$/GEIFewe{,$/ 0C$~> "@=,m,|,(e 0.), 01,pnn,y{
rw} >;,$0=q,$,,($_=$^)=~y,$/ C-~><@=\n\r,-~$:-u/
#y,d,s,(\$.),$1,gee,print
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


[Ldsoss] PAF4J using a NetBeans framework

2006-09-01 Thread Manfred Riem
Hi all,

To make it easier for people to plug into the port of PAF to Java I
have decided to make use of an application framework. This is the 
first version of PAF using the NetBeans platform. If you feel like
trying it out, go to http://www.manorrock.com/products/paf/. And
click on "Webstart It".

Note you will need a working PAF5 file. To help you out in using it,
please read the following:

1. Goto your menu bar and do Window | Favorites.

2. Make sure your PAF5 file is in a directory that shows 
   up for this view. For Windows users if you have it somewhere
 in your "My Documents directory" you should be able to find it.

3. Find your PAF file.

4. Right click on the PAF file.

5. Click on PAF5OpenAction.

6. View the PAF5IndividualView Window on the right.

I know this is all a bit crude, but I wanted to show that the new
design works nicely within the NetBeans framework. If you want to
help out please let me know. 

If there is enough interest I can put these sources online so we
can all contribute.

Note because this is a development release I haven't signed it with
a proper certificate. So you will get that warning message!

Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.manorrock.org/

___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Haws
On 9/1/06, Kevin Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I farfewer people care about online privacy than you might think.  I mustadmit I have never understood why I should care what others know aboutme.KevinThis is a good point, Kevin.  Those who care really (I mean, reall, care).  But most of us feel such risks are just part of life, and not inordinate just because they are on the web.  We do need to be sensitive to those who care, but opt-out is, I think, sufficient.
-- Tom Haws 480-201-5476Who has ever coveted a cloud, a rainbow, or a blue sky? (TH 2006-05-26)
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Kevin Wise
Personally, I would be fine with my finances on the web as well.  I do 
all my banking online, so why not tithing?  That said, I understand your 
point, and I agree that legally some opt-in would be needed, but I far 
fewer people care about online privacy than you might think.  I must 
admit I have never understood why I should care what others know about 
me.  I would honestly like to know what motivates you (or people in 
general) to care about keeping your finances or personal information 
secret?  Are you concerned about identity theft?


Kevin

Steven H. McCown wrote:

Actually, the only parents who are that "out of the loop" are those who
either choose to be or don't concern themselves enough to ask.  A little
"how's my son doing?" to the Scoutmaster would give a better picture.  Most
Scout Masters are excited to talk with parents.  Posting minor children's
information to the internet and trying to secure it with software that isn't
secure won't really cure that.  


As for the $40/year and writing a new software package, that's great, I
support it.  My only complaint is with posting minor children's information
(as discussed on this list) to the web.  Legally, the church will have to
provide an opt-out mechanism (in several countries besides the US).  


People keep mentioning parental involvement and parental tracking.  Here's a
thought, it might be valuable for tithing payers to monitor their charitable
donations and compare their records to the church's.  If only FIS was online
accessible (with appropriate security to only monitor ones own donations),
then we could all go online with a great tool to assist in financial
planning.  This would ease a busy person's burdens and make it so they never
had to go ask the ward clerk for a printout.  


Why is that unreasonable (to all but the most devoted techies)?  Because
it's money.  Whenever money is involved, people get real sensitive.  Why
don't people share the same concern about children?

Steve


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stacey
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:39 AM
To: LDS Open Source Software
Subject: Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

Steven H. McCown wrote:
  
The key is that if you don't *really* have to be web-accessible, then 
don't.





If it isn't web-accessible then parents continue to be largely "out of 
the loop" on their son's status in scouts and we continue to spend money 
out of our YM budgets for TroopMaster licenses. Why would we want to 
take the time to change to save about $40/yr? However, collectively with 
all the wards this could add up for the Church as a whole. We don't 
think collectively at the ward level, however. Therefore, $40/yr for 
scout tracking software can be easily budgeted for to save a headache.


Each parent could have their own copy of the scout tracking software... 
Wrong. Installing and supporting an application on every parent's 
computer is impractical. We would end up fixing parent's operating 
system issues for the most part. Scout masters want to be scout masters 
and not software support specialist.


IMHO,

-stacey.
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

  

___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Stacey

Thomas Haws wrote:

"If I had to call all seven
of my kids' teachers every couple of weeks to find out how they are
doing in each of their classes then this would be a full-time job in 
itself."


For the teacher, you mean!!



Well, ok, not a full-time job but let's do the math (just for fun)...

Seven kids:  three are in high school,  two are in middle school, two 
are in grade school (or pre-school).


The high and middle schoolers have about 7 teachers each so that is 28 
teachers (not to mention football coaches, etc.)   The grade schooler 
has a home room teacher, a music teacher, a computer teacher, and a PE 
teacher.  That's four more.   The pre-schooler has one teacher right 
now.  A grand total of 33 teachers.  So if I called each teacher and 
talked to them for, say, 15 minutes then it would take 8 hrs 15 minutes.



From the teacher's perspective...  let's assume they teach high/middle 
school and teach six classes a day.   The average class size in the 
school district where my kids go has an average class size of something 
like 23 students.   Let's round it down to 20.   Therefore, they would 
teach 120 students.   Therefore, if they talked to each parent 15 
minutes it would take 30 hrs.



In short, having an on-line place for teachers to post grades and 
information about the students progress has been very beneficial for 
both the teacher and the parent.   Thanks to the student progress system 
our school district is using I know if there is a problem with one of my 
kids before the report cards come out.   Also, teachers are not spending 
a good deal of their time talking to the parents but rather they are 
spending more of their time, well hopefully, teaching.


-stacey.
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Haws
"If I had to call all sevenof my kids' teachers every couple of weeks to find out how they aredoing in each of their classes then this would be a full-time job in itself."For the teacher, you mean!!
Tom HAws
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


[Ldsoss] Survey Results: How well do you know your relatives

2006-09-01 Thread Dan Lawyer


Thanks to those of you that took a minute to complete the survey on how well we know our relatives. All of the results are posted on the Taking Genealogy to the Common Person blog (http://eatslikeahuman.blogspot.com/).
 
 
Dan LawyerProduct ManagerFamily and Church HistoryThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints801-240-3205
--

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

--
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Stacey

Steven H. McCown wrote:

Actually, the only parents who are that "out of the loop" are those who
either choose to be or don't concern themselves enough to ask.  A little
"how's my son doing?" to the Scoutmaster would give a better picture.  Most
Scout Masters are excited to talk with parents.  Posting minor children's
information to the internet and trying to secure it with software that isn't
secure won't really cure that.


Yes, ideally, if the parents were on top of things then the 
scoutmaster's job would be easy.  In the scout handbook there is a place 
for recording and tracking everything and the "ideal parent" would make 
sure that is up to date.  There would be no need for scout tracking 
software and this discussion.   Ideal parents wouldn't be asking "how's 
my son doing?" because they would know.  They actually know better than 
the scoutmaster and other YM leaders.  However, out of the 30+ YM we 
have I would say there are only about 5 that have ideal parents.   With 
the less than ideal parents we have to be more proactive, however.



As for the $40/year and writing a new software package, that's great, I
support it.  My only complaint is with posting minor children's information
(as discussed on this list) to the web.  Legally, the church will have to
provide an opt-out mechanism (in several countries besides the US).  
  

There are ways to deal with this...

(1) Minimize the amount of personal information.   While it would be 
nice to have pictures and other personal information about each scout it 
is not necessary.  In fact, the name of the scout doesn't even need to 
be recorded.  Simply just assign them a number.


(2) Let them opt-out.  If a parent doesn't want their son's information 
on-line then, by all means, let them opt-out.  Let them track their 
son's progress.  Like I mentioned above some parents do better than we do. 

(3) Have security minded folks like yourself do a complete security 
audit of the code.   If there is a security problem then find it and let 
the developers know. 


People keep mentioning parental involvement and parental tracking.  Here's a
thought, it might be valuable for tithing payers to monitor their charitable
donations and compare their records to the church's.  If only FIS was online
accessible (with appropriate security to only monitor ones own donations),
then we could all go online with a great tool to assist in financial
planning.  This would ease a busy person's burdens and make it so they never
had to go ask the ward clerk for a printout.  


Why is that unreasonable (to all but the most devoted techies)?  Because
it's money.  Whenever money is involved, people get real sensitive.  Why
don't people share the same concern about children?
  


Like many other people I track my bank account on-line.  I pay my bills 
on-line.  I track my stock portfolio and make stock trades on-line.  
Millions of people do this.   The school puts my kids' grades on-line 
along with all the other students in our school district.   I actually 
like to be able to look at my kids grades any time of the day or night.  
This keeps me in the "loop" about how my kids are doing in school.   I 
applaud the school district for doing this.  If I had to call all seven 
of my kids' teachers every couple of weeks to find out how they are 
doing in each of their classes then this would be a full-time job in itself.


I am more concerned about the paper that goes into my garbage than what 
people can find out about me on-line.   I invested in a very good paper 
shredder and use it constantly.   I once picked up some papers than had 
blown out of my neighbors trash can into my yard.  To my surprise it was 
his bank statement.  I am more concerned about the financial clerk that 
enters my donations into FIS.   Once I had our financial clerk in a 
former ward mention to someone else in the ward (and not the bishop) the 
amount of a donation that I had made.   I started paying my tithing 
directly to the church office rather than to my ward.  Of course, the 
main reason I do this now is the fact I use stock (and other "gifts in 
kind') to pay my tithing. 

In short, I have almost three degrees in computer engineering (I dropped 
out of my PhD program before I finished my dissertation to start a very 
successful internet company) and view myself as a very devoted techie.  
I don't find the idea of dealing with money on-line unreasonable.   I 
don't find the idea of my kids' grades being posted on-line 
unreasonable.  If the Church decided to put my donation information 
on-line to make my tax preparation easier then I would use that service 
as well.  I find on-line services very useful as a responsible parent to 
do my job and to have more time with my family.  



IMHO,

-stacey.
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss


RE: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

2006-09-01 Thread Steven H. McCown
Actually, the only parents who are that "out of the loop" are those who
either choose to be or don't concern themselves enough to ask.  A little
"how's my son doing?" to the Scoutmaster would give a better picture.  Most
Scout Masters are excited to talk with parents.  Posting minor children's
information to the internet and trying to secure it with software that isn't
secure won't really cure that.  

As for the $40/year and writing a new software package, that's great, I
support it.  My only complaint is with posting minor children's information
(as discussed on this list) to the web.  Legally, the church will have to
provide an opt-out mechanism (in several countries besides the US).  

People keep mentioning parental involvement and parental tracking.  Here's a
thought, it might be valuable for tithing payers to monitor their charitable
donations and compare their records to the church's.  If only FIS was online
accessible (with appropriate security to only monitor ones own donations),
then we could all go online with a great tool to assist in financial
planning.  This would ease a busy person's burdens and make it so they never
had to go ask the ward clerk for a printout.  

Why is that unreasonable (to all but the most devoted techies)?  Because
it's money.  Whenever money is involved, people get real sensitive.  Why
don't people share the same concern about children?

Steve


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stacey
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:39 AM
To: LDS Open Source Software
Subject: Re: [Ldsoss] Scout Tracking

Steven H. McCown wrote:
>
> The key is that if you don't *really* have to be web-accessible, then 
> don't.
>

If it isn't web-accessible then parents continue to be largely "out of 
the loop" on their son's status in scouts and we continue to spend money 
out of our YM budgets for TroopMaster licenses. Why would we want to 
take the time to change to save about $40/yr? However, collectively with 
all the wards this could add up for the Church as a whole. We don't 
think collectively at the ward level, however. Therefore, $40/yr for 
scout tracking software can be easily budgeted for to save a headache.

Each parent could have their own copy of the scout tracking software... 
Wrong. Installing and supporting an application on every parent's 
computer is impractical. We would end up fixing parent's operating 
system issues for the most part. Scout masters want to be scout masters 
and not software support specialist.

IMHO,

-stacey.
___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

___
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss