[leaf-user] Re: creating bering CDROM automatically
Hello, Jacques put the first version of my script which creates bering-CDs automatically into contrib directory. It can be found here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/create_iso.sh As mentioned it does all the steps from the user's guide to configure/create a bering cdrom. Are there any comments ? Thanks Heinz ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Broadcast traffic and dnscache
Hi Questions: 1) How do I disable dnscache? I tried editing /etc/init.d/dnscache to turn it off, but which package do I need to back up to save this change? 2) We get a lot of broadcast traffic on the external interface (eth1) particularly on port 520 and port 69 - where are the rules that log this traffic? How do I turn it off? I'm running Dachstein 1.02 connecting to a fibre-optic ethernet connection to the Internet (on eth1). The fibre-optic connection is a switched network with a large number of machines on it - rather than point-to-point. Our ISP's router is one of those machines. Quite a few machines on the fibre-optic connection are running private IP addresses (192.168.* and 10.*). I modified ipfilter.conf to prevent log_martians from logging traffic on the private ranges, but I'm not sure about the port 520 and 69 traffic. Sample /var/log/messages logs: May 23 22:34:59 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth1 PROTO=17 203.97.144.54:520 255.255.255.255:520 L=52 S=0xC0 I=0 F=0x T=2 (#32) May 23 22:35:02 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth1 PROTO=17 192.168.1.128:9564 255.255.255.255:69 L=49 S=0x00 I=2 F=0x T=255 (#7) May 23 22:35:02 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth1 PROTO=17 192.168.1.128:6524 255.255.255.255:69 L=49 S=0x00 I=2 F=0x T=255 (#7) We run BIND on an internal server, so I've set the Dachstein machine to use that - I assume we don't need the dnscache, so I've turned it off to ensure it doesn't generate additional network traffic. But it keeps reappearing after reboots! Greg Ford ReddFish intergalactic -Original Message- From: Heinz Bruederlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 19:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Re: creating bering CDROM automatically Hello, Jacques put the first version of my script which creates bering-CDs automatically into contrib directory. It can be found here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/create_iso.sh As mentioned it does all the steps from the user's guide to configure/create a bering cdrom. Are there any comments ? Thanks Heinz ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] duplicate mail from lists
Hi all I am receiving duplicate mail of the list, almost all the traffic of mail arrives twice. Can be that something function badly in the server of the list or is my postfix? bye Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] RE:IPsec client for windows (free)
Hi ! I did not know that w2000 had IPsec support buit in. I am going to test it. Thanks to all Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu On Wed, 22 May 2002, David Goodrich wrote: Just as a warning, i installed PGP Freeware 7.01's VPN software on my windows XP box and it renedered my network connection totally nonfunctional, i had to reinstall the OS. -david __ http://complex.wox.org -Original Message- From: Brock Nanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] RE: IPsec client for windows (free) I played with PGPnet about a year ago. At that time, the 'free' version would NOT support access to a LAN behind the firewall. In other words, you could use it to build a tunnel between two machines only. The useful functionality came in the more costly version. As a matter of interest, the install at that time was rather fearsome... I spent a few days cleaning up the mess it left before I could boot cleanly! I don't think there is a completely 'free' ipsec windows client in existence. The closest are Sentinel and PGPNet. Both are know to work with FreeS/WAN. You haven't said what windows version you are running. As others have mentioned, 2K and XP both have IPSec built in and can work with FreeS/WAN without any additional software. Brock Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:55:47 -0400 (ART) From: Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Re: IPsec client for windows (free) Hello I have listened that with the last version of PGP (PGPnet) can be installed a VPN with IPSec. Someone has done this? Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] RE:IPsec client for windows (free)
After days of trying we gave up on ipsec in Win2000. XP is better but very frustrating to configure. ( We are fairly experienced with FreeSWAN ) SSH sentinel is a dream if your time is valuable. Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/23/2002 08:06:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx) Subject: [leaf-user] RE:IPsec client for windows (free) Hi ! I did not know that w2000 had IPsec support buit in. I am going to test it. Thanks to all Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu On Wed, 22 May 2002, David Goodrich wrote: Just as a warning, i installed PGP Freeware 7.01's VPN software on my windows XP box and it renedered my network connection totally nonfunctional, i had to reinstall the OS. -david __ http://complex.wox.org -Original Message- From: Brock Nanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] RE: IPsec client for windows (free) I played with PGPnet about a year ago. At that time, the 'free' version would NOT support access to a LAN behind the firewall. In other words, you could use it to build a tunnel between two machines only. The useful functionality came in the more costly version. As a matter of interest, the install at that time was rather fearsome... I spent a few days cleaning up the mess it left before I could boot cleanly! I don't think there is a completely 'free' ipsec windows client in existence. The closest are Sentinel and PGPNet. Both are know to work with FreeS/WAN. You haven't said what windows version you are running. As others have mentioned, 2K and XP both have IPSec built in and can work with FreeS/WAN without any additional software. Brock Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:55:47 -0400 (ART) From: Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Re: IPsec client for windows (free) Hello I have listened that with the last version of PGP (PGPnet) can be installed a VPN with IPSec. Someone has done this? Roberto Pereyra Gualeguaychu Argentina http://www.linux-net.com.ar GnuPG keyID: BB43E337 http://pgp.mit.edu ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering and pptpd
We're trying to configure a Bering router for running pptp tunnels. The router itself is the server, with Windows clients connecting to it over a broadband radio network ( and then going out to the Internet). We've used Bering for IPSEC in a similar setup, and that works fine. The Bering version is 1.0-rc2. I've tested the pptp setup with a Red Hat pptpd server and a windows client, and that works OK. Then I've tried to run the pptpd on a Bering box, and this doesn't work. I installed ppp.lrp and pptpd.lrp for Bering, put in the same configuration as on the Red Hat box, and started pptpd. The Windows client return error 651, and basically says that something went wrong ( stopping the pptpd results in a different error, so it makes a difference whether it runs or not). Tcpdump on the Bering box's interface shows that 'ack' packets are exchanged between LRP and Windows boxes, but there's nothing at all in the system logs, so it looks like the communication never gets as far as trying any authentication. Iptables let's everything through, and the two systems can ping each other, so the basic setup is OK. Has anyone managed to get this working on a Bering distribution ? Most of the documentation I've come across is about is using ppp/pptp to get out from an LRP box. Best regards Geir Austad ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Secure browsing...
Hello all -- I'm an older leaf user -- haven't really bothered to upgrade because there was no reason to -- I'm using Eigerstein 1680k. However, if I can't do this with eigerstein, then maybe this will be a motivation to move up if I can do it with something else. Anonymizer.com offers a pay service for ssh tunnelled secure browsing -- so you can browse at work kind of stuff. SSH to their server, and tunnel your browser through it. They, in turn, push that out onto the internet -- So your boss doesn't know you're searching monster, or a competitor's site, or reading your browser-based email for that matter. I know I can tunnel my browser through ssh to my LRP at home to view a webserver on my internal network at home, but how about redirecting that browser outside onto the internet? I'd localhost:8080 my browser from work, which would go to my lrp, which would, in turn go out onto the internet. I know I'm missing some piece here because port forwarding only works to a specific machine - there has to be another piece, but I don't know what it is Anybody have any thougths? thanks. mike. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge
I have Bering RC2 up and running just fine. I have 2 interfaces that are working perfectly. I added bridge.lrp and bridge.o to the modules directory. When I try to do a brctl addbr br0 I get Br_add_bridge: package not installed It looks like bridge.o is not getting loaded, even though it is in the modules file. Any ideas? -Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Secure browsing...
On Thu, 23 May 2002 08:25:30 PDT Michael McClure wrote: Anonymizer.com offers a pay service for ssh tunnelled secure browsing -- so you can browse at work kind of stuff. SSH to their server, and tunnel your browser through it. They, in turn, push that out onto the internet -- So your boss doesn't know you're searching monster, or a competitor's site, or reading your browser-based email for that matter. I know I can tunnel my browser through ssh to my LRP at home to view a webserver on my internal network at home, but how about redirecting that browser outside onto the internet? If you setup a proxy server on your firewall or internal network at home, you can setup an ssh tunnel to your proxy server and then use the proxy over the tunnel. Apache is pretty easy to setup as a proxy server and I have used it exactly as you described above. There many other proxy servers that would work too, including squid and junkbuster. Technically, the proxy doesn't need to be on your network at all. You could setup a tunnel like so: ssh myhost -L 8080:public.proxyserver:proxyport The traffic between myhost and public.proxyserver would not be encrypted, but you'd still be encrypted from the the ssh client host to myhost. --Brad I'd localhost:8080 my browser from work, which would go to my lrp, which would, in turn go out onto the internet. I know I'm missing some piece here because port forwarding only works to a specific machine - there has to be another piece, but I don't know what it is Anybody have any thougths? thanks. mike. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] duplicate mail from lists
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Roberto Pereyra wrote: Hi all I am receiving duplicate mail of the list, almost all the traffic of mail arrives twice. Can be that something function badly in the server of the list or is my postfix? You need to examine the headers of these messages to determine that. However, the only doubled messages I get are ones replied to me on list, where the reply goes to me directly, and the list is cc'd. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge
You will have to obtain dridge.o it is on the Bering site and use the instructions how to add the module to your disk and uncomment in the modules list like ethernet cards, check the Bering installation guide. Hope this help you. Larry Platzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 May 2002, Darren Wright wrote: Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:48:19 -0400 From: Darren Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge I have Bering RC2 up and running just fine. I have 2 interfaces that are working perfectly. I added bridge.lrp and bridge.o to the modules directory. When I try to do a brctl addbr br0 I get Br_add_bridge: package not installed It looks like bridge.o is not getting loaded, even though it is in the modules file. Any ideas? -Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge
Yup done that.I'm playing around with different versions of bridge.o That may make a difference... -Darren -Original Message- From: Larry Platzek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:38 PM To: Darren Wright Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge You will have to obtain dridge.o it is on the Bering site and use the instructions how to add the module to your disk and uncomment in the modules list like ethernet cards, check the Bering installation guide. Hope this help you. Larry Platzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 May 2002, Darren Wright wrote: Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:48:19 -0400 From: Darren Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge I have Bering RC2 up and running just fine. I have 2 interfaces that are working perfectly. I added bridge.lrp and bridge.o to the modules directory. When I try to do a brctl addbr br0 I get Br_add_bridge: package not installed It looks like bridge.o is not getting loaded, even though it is in the modules file. Any ideas? -Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm -- -- leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] duplicate mail from lists
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 06:03, Roberto Pereyra wrote: I am receiving duplicate mail of the list, almost all the traffic of mail arrives twice. Can be that something function badly in the server of the list or is my postfix? Roberto, Please send me the header information from a post that you received twice. I'll need the full headers from both copies. Thanks. In the future please send list admin requests to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote: If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any glibc 2.0 system, including dachstein or bering. Richard, Is the package you have different than the ones we have in cvs? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/dhcrelay.lrp -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
Hi Troy, Version 2.0-1 can be found in a mirror of Ken Wongs old LRP archive. Here is a link for it. http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net/files/kwarchive/dhcrelay.lrp I have used this version in the past with LRP 2.9.8, and it should work find with whatever you are using. It was dead easy to setup, I think there is just one config file in lrcfg packages menu. This package is 23K, so it is nice and small. Cheers edt - Original Message - From: Troy Aden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:34 PM Subject: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS Hi I am working with Dachstein in a basic router setup. I would like to know how to set up DHCP request forwarding between subnets so that we can administer all of our subnets with one DHCP server. I will do my best to draw this out. -ROUTER- Subnet 1 - 192.168.141.1 Subnet 2 - 192.168.142.1 Subnet 3 - 192.168.143.1 DHCP SERVER IS ON SUBNET 1. (192.168.141.252) I want computers that are on the .142 and 143 subnets to (Obtain Ips from the DHCP server on subnet 1) have their DHCP REQUESTS forwarded to the DHCP SERVER ON SUBNET 1 (.141) How is this done? Can someone please help me out. Thanks in advance. Troy ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:57, Ed Tetz wrote: Version 2.0-1 can be found in a mirror of Ken Wongs old LRP archive. Here is a link for it. http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net/files/kwarchive/dhcrelay.lrp I have used this version in the past with LRP 2.9.8, and it should work find with whatever you are using. It was dead easy to setup, I think there is just one config file in lrcfg packages menu. This package is 23K, so it is nice and small. Ed, Actually, Koon Wong created four versions of this package. Two kernel 2.0x versions and two 2.2x versions. All of these are in our cvs repository. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/ -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] smtp whoes
what does this mean, i did a telnet mail.server.com 25 twice and tcp 6 67 SYN_SENT src=192.168.20.5 dst=208.57.74.68 sport=2375 dport=25 [UNREPLIED] src=208.57.74.68 dst=63.27.24.209 sport=25 dport=2375 use=1 tcp 6 117 SYN_SENT src=192.168.20.5 dst=24.130.14.117 sport=2376 dport=25 [UNREPLIED] src=24.130.14.117 dst=63.27.24.209 sport=25 dport=2376 use=1 is in shorewall status. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: Order of PCI ethernet cards:
-- Forwarded by Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx on 05/23/2002 01:09 PM --- Phillip Watts 05/23/2002 01:17 PM To: Matthew Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Order of PCI ethernet cards: (Document link: Phillip Watts) Well, I lied. Or rather fooled myself. Changing the mac address did not correct the order of selection. The cards are ordered, eth0, eth1 in the same order the bios assigns interrupts to them, regardless. I suspect Linux could care less about the interrupts and does its own pci scan. I'm using 2.4.18 ( in the process of intergrating into Bering) from kernel.org It comes with 8139too.o which depends on mii.o. DO YOU KNOW if mii.o is a pci-scan or if that is built into 8139too.o ? Do you know where is source to mii.o if so? Do you know if 'setpci' is of any value in this problem? Thanx. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: [Shorewall-users] smtp whoes
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote: what does this mean, i did a telnet mail.server.com 25 twice and tcp 6 67 SYN_SENT src=192.168.20.5 dst=208.57.74.68 sport=2375 dport=25 [UNREPLIED] src=208.57.74.68 dst=63.27.24.209 sport=25 dport=2375 use=1 tcp 6 117 SYN_SENT src=192.168.20.5 dst=24.130.14.117 sport=2376 dport=25 [UNREPLIED] src=24.130.14.117 dst=63.27.24.209 sport=25 dport=2376 use=1 It means that the first step of the 3-way TCP handshake was complete (at least from what the firewall can tell). The SYN packet was sent from your client (192.168.20.5) to two different SMTP servers but no SYN-ACK was received back. -Tom -- Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge / wireless
Ok I have the bridge software working now.I found the right bridge.o file. HOWEVER. I've got both ethernet interfaces to work properly..Prism II wireless is ETH0 and the 3c589 is ETH1. When I get the bridge going and assign it an IP address, it is not pingable, and no traffic is passing. Is this a problem with having wireless on one side? -Darren ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] PUMP
Quick question/problem about pump. I had my Bering system setup working smoothly just yesterday. Today I found that the internet gateway wasn't functioning. It seems that Bering (pump) was unable to renegotiate a DHCP lease with my cable provider. And now, it remains unable to do so, even after reboot, etc. I can ping other hosts on the internal network, but nothing gets out. I backed up all my settings, and had rebooted several times, so it's not that. What confuses me is that WinXP is able to get a DHCP lease whenever it wants, and pump isn't able to. What's the difference? Is my provider blocking access? I don't think Cogeco Cable forces the MAC address to remain constant (in fact, it worked on this very same setup yesterday!). So what the heck is wrong? heh. Thanks, -- JCA __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
Hmm, the package in CVS seems to contain dhcpd not dhcrelay. -Richard On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:51, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote: If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any glibc 2.0 system, including dachstein or bering. Richard, Is the package you have different than the ones we have in cvs? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/dhcrelay.lrp ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] PUMP
Are you trying to use pump on eth1? I recently discovered that it is not reliable except on eth0. For instance, I have one unit with three 3c509 cards. In that machine, it works on eth1. I have another with a 3c509 for eth0 and an SMC Ultra for eth1. Pump sends the request out on eth1 and listens for the reply on eth0. I was able to determine this by plugging both cards into the same hub and watching the lights and watching the logs on my dhcp server. When I switched the modules so the SMC loaded first and became eth0, it was able to receive the address so I knew it wasn't the card. I did some searching and found similar reports on the redhat site. I don't know if dhclient has this problem or not. JamesS At 11:29 AM 5/23/02 -0700, J wrote: Quick question/problem about pump. I had my Bering system setup working smoothly just yesterday. Today I found that the internet gateway wasn't functioning. It seems that Bering (pump) was unable to renegotiate a DHCP lease with my cable provider. And now, it remains unable to do so, even after reboot, etc. I can ping other hosts on the internal network, but nothing gets out. I backed up all my settings, and had rebooted several times, so it's not that. What confuses me is that WinXP is able to get a DHCP lease whenever it wants, and pump isn't able to. What's the difference? Is my provider blocking access? I don't think Cogeco Cable forces the MAC address to remain constant (in fact, it worked on this very same setup yesterday!). So what the heck is wrong? heh. Thanks, -- JCA __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 11:47, Richard Doyle wrote: Hmm, the package in CVS seems to contain dhcpd not dhcrelay. Richard, That's strange. I just did a diff of the current cvs version to the last Koon Wong release, and they're the same. mhnoyes@usw-pr-shell2:~/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0$ diff dhcrelay.lrp leaf/devel/thc/files/kwarchive/linux-2.2/beta/dhcrelay.lrp The tar tvzf results verify your statement though. This file was misnamed in Koon Wong's archive. Did you check the other versions in cvs? I'm sure this is not the last mistake will find in the new packages tree. :-( On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:51, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote: If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any glibc 2.0 system, including dachstein or bering. Richard, Is the package you have different than the ones we have in cvs? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/dhcrelay.lrp -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
Mike, That is the file I referred to in my email to Troy (version 2.0-1). I am a little confused by the version information that is listed on that page though. It lists the following: Revision Package Version 1.4? 1.32.0-1 1.23.0b1p10-1 1.12.0-1 All with the same creation date. Since I am new to CVS, I would be (and am :-) ) confused by which version I should want to download. I downloaded them all and took a look at them. It appears that the package version are correct, so 1.1 is updated by 1.3 for version 2.0-1, 1.2 is alone as a build of 3.0, but 1.4 actually appears to be DHCPD, and not the relay agent - now more confused :-). Please let me know if I am on the right track for working with the CVS files. BTW, I didn't realize that apparently all of the LRP files for LEAF were available here on the site. Kudos. Cheers edt - Original Message - From: Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote: If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any glibc 2.0 system, including dachstein or bering. Richard, Is the package you have different than the ones we have in cvs? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/d hcrelay.lrp -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge / wireless
Le Jeudi 23 Mai 2002 20:21, Darren Wright a écrit : Ok I have the bridge software working now.I found the right bridge.o file. HOWEVER. I've got both ethernet interfaces to work properly..Prism II wireless is ETH0 and the 3c589 is ETH1. When I get the bridge going and assign it an IP address, it is not pingable, and no traffic is passing. Is this a problem with having wireless on one side? How do you activate the bridge ? Through the /etc/network/interfaces file or through a dedicated script ? Are you using Shorewall ? Jacques ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 13:01, Ed Tetz wrote: Mike, That is the file I referred to in my email to Troy (version 2.0-1). I am a little confused by the version information that is listed on that page though. It lists the following: Revision Package Version 1.4? This file is incorrectly named, and was committed by mistake. Sorry. 1.32.0-1 kernel 2.2x version of dhcrelay 1.23.0b1p10-1 1.12.0-1 These are kernel 2.0x versions of dhcrelay All with the same creation date. Since I am new to CVS, I would be (and am :-) ) confused by which version I should want to download. I downloaded them all and took a look at them. It appears that the package version are correct, so 1.1 is updated by 1.3 for version 2.0-1, 1.2 is alone as a build of 3.0, but 1.4 actually appears to be DHCPD, and not the relay agent - now more confused :-). Ed, Sorry for the confusion. The current version should be the last added to cvs. Unfortunately, the last package I added from Koon Wong's archive wasn't actually dhcrelay. Try the 1.3 cvs version. Please let me know if I am on the right track for working with the CVS files. BTW, I didn't realize that apparently all of the LRP files for LEAF were available here on the site. Kudos. Thanks, but I'm not done yet. All of the glibc-2.0 packages through the letter o are in cvs, but the rest aren't yet. I'm working on it though. - Original Message - From: Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote: If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any glibc 2.0 system, including dachstein or bering. Richard, Is the package you have different than the ones we have in cvs? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/d hcrelay.lrp -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering and pptpd
Geir: I have never tried pptp tunnels with Bering but I am very much interested in the results of your test if some fixes are needed and also to document that a bit. Bering pptp was built following exactly the descriptions given on Tom's site http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm Are you sure you are using the good patched version of pppd ? You cannot use the ppp.lrp package provided with Bering directly. You need to replace the pppd program in ppp.lrp by it's patched version. Check here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bipackages.html#AEN700 I hope that will fix your pb Jacques We're trying to configure a Bering router for running pptp tunnels. The router itself is the server, with Windows clients connecting to it over a broadband radio network ( and then going out to the Internet). We've used Bering for IPSEC in a similar setup, and that works fine. The Bering version is 1.0-rc2. I've tested the pptp setup with a Red Hat pptpd server and a windows client, and that works OK. Then I've tried to run the pptpd on a Bering box, and this doesn't work. I installed ppp.lrp and pptpd.lrp for Bering, put in the same configuration as on the Red Hat box, and started pptpd. The Windows client return error 651, and basically says that something went wrong ( stopping the pptpd results in a different error, so it makes a difference whether it runs or not). Tcpdump on the Bering box's interface shows that 'ack' packets are exchanged between LRP and Windows boxes, but there's nothing at all in the system logs, so it looks like the communication never gets as far as trying any authentication. Iptables let's everything through, and the two systems can ping each other, so the basic setup is OK. Has anyone managed to get this working on a Bering distribution ? Most of the documentation I've come across is about is using ppp/pptp to get out from an LRP box. Best regards Geir Austad ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] PUMP
I think I'd be tempted to look at dhclient instead. I've had similar problems with pump on the Shaw network. It may even be related to the 3c509 NIC's I have, but in previous LEAF versions (eiger, eigerstein) things worked properly (with the newer version of dhclient). My symptom was that 3 times out of 4 (or so) I couldn't get a lease on boot. After boot I could run pump and get the lease, although not always. I did have an occasion when I couldn't get one for a couple of days after some initial success. I changed to another 3c509 and haven't had this happen since. Looking back at it, out of 3 3c509's, all have managed to obtain leases. One was unlikely to get one at boot but could when pump was run manually after. Another worked for a few days, then refused to get a lease by any method. The third has run flawlessly. The questionable NIC's have found homes in other projects and have worked just fine (where no Shaw dhcp is required!), so they appear to be sound. So, while I have trouble believing the characteristics of the particular NIC can be the problem, I'm starting to wonder... Until I installed the last NIC I was convinced I'd be going to dhclient. If you do try it, let me know if this solved the problem - I'm curious now! I may go to dhclient just for peace of mind... Brock Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:49:49 -0500 To: J [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: JamesSturdevant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] PUMP Are you trying to use pump on eth1? I recently discovered that it is not reliable except on eth0. For instance, I have one unit with three 3c509 cards. In that machine, it works on eth1. I have another with a 3c509 for eth0 and an SMC Ultra for eth1. Pump sends the request out on eth1 and listens for the reply on eth0. I was able to determine this by plugging both cards into the same hub and watching the lights and watching the logs on my dhcp server. When I switched the modules so the SMC loaded first and became eth0, it was able to receive the address so I knew it wasn't the card. I did some searching and found similar reports on the redhat site. I don't know if dhclient has this problem or not. JamesS At 11:29 AM 5/23/02 -0700, J wrote: Quick question/problem about pump. I had my Bering system setup working smoothly just yesterday. Today I found that the internet gateway wasn't functioning. It seems that Bering (pump) was unable to renegotiate a DHCP lease with my cable provider. And now, it remains unable to do so, even after reboot, etc. I can ping other hosts on the internal network, but nothing gets out. I backed up all my settings, and had rebooted several times, so it's not that. What confuses me is that WinXP is able to get a DHCP lease whenever it wants, and pump isn't able to. What's the difference? Is my provider blocking access? I don't think Cogeco Cable forces the MAC address to remain constant (in fact, it worked on this very same setup yesterday!). So what the heck is wrong? heh. Thanks, -- JCA ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ssh to host behind firewall: connect direct or through router?
There seem to be two ways to allow ssh access from outside the firewall to a host inside: 1. forward some port on the fw to the host; 2. connect directly to sshd on the fw and use the -Lport:host:port flag to forward an additional connection to the host. Is there agreement on which method is better (where better means more secure, I guess)? The fw and host are at home. Most of the time I'm connecting from outside I'm either at work and want to xhost some app, or I want to transfer a bunch of files. Occasionally I need to tweak the router, so picking #1 above wouldn't remove the need to have sshd on the router's floppy. Connections are always from machines that have keys in the router's (and inside host's) .ssh/authorized_keys files. Password login is disabled. I'm running Bering RC2. Thanks, --Eric ** * From the desktop of: Eric House, [EMAIL PROTECTED]* *Crosswords 4.0 for PalmOS is out!: http://www.peak.org/~fixin/xwords * ** ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: Virtual environment for developing lpr packages
Le Jeudi 23 Mai 2002 21:44, vous avez écrit : I have question about howto make a lrp package: I want to use cipe with the linux router project and I want to use leaf, so I have to make a lrp package. According to the documentation, packages should be compiled with glibc-2.0. I've installed Redhat 5.2 (has glibc2.0.x) in a virtual machine (VMware). RedHat5.2 has the 2.7 version of gcc. I compiled a newer version of gcc with version 2.95.3 from the sources (needed for compiling cipe). The kernel 2.4.18 I compiled on my Redhat 7.3 machine and transferred it to my virtual machine. My general question is: Is this environment correct to develop a lpr package? 1/ Your kernel can be compiled on any machine with a GCC 2.95.3 /4 compiler or better. Check linux/Documentation/Changes. You do not need glibc for compiling the kernel or the kernel modules 2/ If you have user space programs, then you need to compile those in a glibc 2.0 environnement. Redhat 5.2 should be OK (I have no experience with that). Original LEAF development system is Debian/slink. Check: ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/slink Or use a virtual slink machine on any recent linux box: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/uml03.html Two files to download and you will be ready to go. Jacques ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Bering RC2 and bridge / wireless
I waited to reply in case someone else saw an obvious answer to your problem. If you can't ping and can't pass traffic, by what definition of working is the bridge software working now? And how do you know that you've got both ethernet interfaces to work properly? What *does* work? Does the LEAF system *route* successfully, for *example*? What are the usual diagnostics for this system? At 02:21 PM 5/23/02 -0400, Darren Wright wrote: Ok I have the bridge software working now.I found the right bridge.o file. HOWEVER. I've got both ethernet interfaces to work properly..Prism II wireless is ETH0 and the 3c589 is ETH1. When I get the bridge going and assign it an IP address, it is not pingable, and no traffic is passing. Is this a problem with having wireless on one side? -- ---Never tell me the odds!-- Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo Palo Alto, California, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Ez-ipupdate
Whats the procedure for gettin ez-ipupdate to run automatically (daemon) from dhclient to dialup ppp0? And why does my bering rc1 always start with 2 ppp's ppp0,ppp1? ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
