Re: [leaf-user] help: getting PPPOE to work on wisp-dist
You can see syslog entries by going to statistics - system log. There is another person who got PPPoE working on WISP-Dist; search the mailing list archives for more info. Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote: I tried getting PPPOE to work on wisp-dist, but since I am rather new to this I couldn't figure out why it didn't work. Unfortunately, wisp-dist does not have the GUI interface support so that newbies like me can just follow some instructions to set things up correctly. So I followed the bering PPPOE instructions and edited the /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider and /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file by hand. I also made sure that the various PPPOE related modules in /etc/modules were uncommented. At this point, I was under the impression that a simple reboot would kick start the ppp0 device connected via eth0 to my DSL modem. It seems that wisp-dist does not generate a syslog file, and so I cannot peek there to find out why it is not working. Any hints on what I should do next? Thanks, Marc -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivaschenko Thunderworx - Senior Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Strange happenings with Bering 1.2
I've installed a number of Bering 1.2 systems all connected by Ipsec VPNs and they work fine. All including the strange one are quite similar. While migrating yet another system from Dachstein to Bering I've encountered a couple of strange things and wondered if anyone had any ideas what might be going on. The LEAF system in question is a simple firewall/VPN gateway with only two NICs. It has a cable modem on eth0 and a switch connecting a handful of PCs on eth1. The first strange thing that happened was that the NICs swapped device IDs. What was eth0 became eth1 and vice versa. I always thought that which NIC became eth0 was BIOS dependent not kernel dependent. The swap did not present a big problem, it is just a curiosity. Has anyone else seen this happen when going from Dachstein 1.02 to Bering 1.2? The second strange thing is a problem. Please understand that this system ran months under Dachstein with no failures, and switching back to Dachstein makes the problem go away. It seems that every time any kind of load is placed on the system (say a 10 meg download), the inside NIC, eth1 a (3Com 3c509), stops responding. If the load stays low, the system runs normally. Do an FTP or pull something of any size down from the Web and eth1 goes away. I have looked in very log file and I can find no error messages. When the problem happens I can not access the LEAF eth1 interface from any of the PCs, nor can I ping any of the local PCs from the LEAF console. While eth1 is down eth0 is up and running. From the LEAF console I can ping the Internet and hosts over the VPNs, I continue to be able to collect SNMP data from the LEAF across the VPN. In short everything seems to be working just as it should except eth1 is dead.. In trying to fix the problem I have tried the usual things. I have tried shutting down and restarting eth1 with ifconfig, done a network restart, restarted Shorewall, everything I could think of that might be the problem. Nothing brings back eth1. The only thing that seems to work is a reboot. I am at the point of grasping at straws on this one. If anyone on the list has seen this before, or can tell me where to start looking, or what tests to perform to provide the list with more useful information, please let me know. Best Regards, Roger McClurg --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Strange happenings with Bering 1.2
Roger E McClurg wrote: The first strange thing that happened was that the NICs swapped device IDs. What was eth0 became eth1 and vice versa. I always thought that which NIC became eth0 was BIOS dependent not kernel dependent. The swap did not present a big problem, it is just a curiosity. Has anyone else seen this happen when going from Dachstein 1.02 to Bering 1.2? The NIC numbering is *DRIVER* dependent, although the driver may use methods that are dependent on the motherboard or NIC chipset, BIOS, PC layout (ie ordering of the PCI connectors), MAC addressing of the NICs, or whatever else the device driver writer found handy. Since Bering runs with an updated kernel, I suspect you are encountering an issue with a new (or updated) driver for the NICs you're using. The second strange thing is a problem. Please understand that this system ran months under Dachstein with no failures, and switching back to Dachstein makes the problem go away. It seems that every time any kind of load is placed on the system (say a 10 meg download), the inside NIC, eth1 a (3Com 3c509), stops responding. If the load stays low, the system runs normally. Do an FTP or pull something of any size down from the Web and eth1 goes away. I have looked in very log file and I can find no error messages. When the problem happens I can not access the LEAF eth1 interface from any of the PCs, nor can I ping any of the local PCs from the LEAF console. While eth1 is down eth0 is up and running. From the LEAF console I can ping the Internet and hosts over the VPNs, I continue to be able to collect SNMP data from the LEAF across the VPN. In short everything seems to be working just as it should except eth1 is dead.. In trying to fix the problem I have tried the usual things. I have tried shutting down and restarting eth1 with ifconfig, done a network restart, restarted Shorewall, everything I could think of that might be the problem. Nothing brings back eth1. The only thing that seems to work is a reboot. I am at the point of grasping at straws on this one. If anyone on the list has seen this before, or can tell me where to start looking, or what tests to perform to provide the list with more useful information, please let me know. I've not seen this particular problem before, but I'd bet it's a problem with the updated driver. I don't remember offhand if the 3c509's are the ISA or PCI cards, but if they're the ISA cards, it wouldn't be real suprising if a bug hasn't creapt into the current driver. There isn't a lot of regression testing that goes on for the older cards that are supported by the same driver as a current chipset (I ran into a problem with this and the AIC7xxx driver using an old EISA Adaptec card...the new driver worked great with recent PCI hardware, but it failed to work with my EISA controller, although previous drivers had worked perfectly, so I knew the hardware was solid). I suggest you track down which version of the 3Com driver you're running in Dachstein and Bering. I think there are several drivers for the 3Coms floating around, so if you have an alternate choice of driver for Bering, that's the first thing I'd try...otherwise, I suggest you do a bit of googling for others having the same problem with the 3Com driver, and you may have to build your own version of the driver from the latest source, an earlier release, or possibly a patched version. -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] LRP
Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org Just a heads up. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Compile Sagem FAST800 USB Modem
Hi ! I tried it : - linux UML 2.4.20 - kernel patched bering 1.2 linked in /usr/src/linux When I start the make procedure it complains about missing files : /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h /usr/src/linux/include/linux/autoconf.h So I decided to get them from 2.4.20 standard debian. After that I have some troubles like that : In file included from Adiutil.h:34, from AdiUsbAdslDriver.c:32: /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:7: linux/modules/b1capi.ver: No such file or directory /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:8: linux/modules/b1pci.ver: No such file or directory /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:9: linux/modules/capidrv.ver: No such file or directory /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:10: linux/modules/capiutil.ver: No such file or directory or like that : In file included from Adiutil.h:37, from AdiUsbAdslDriver.c:32: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:63: parse error before `void' /usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:94: parse error before `int' /usr/src/linux/include/asm/rwsem.h: In function `__down_read': In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/rwsem.h:29, from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/semaphore.h:42, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:200, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/capability.h:17, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/binfmts.h:6, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h:9, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h:4, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/slab.h:14, from Adiutil.h:39, from AdiUsbAdslDriver.c:32: I'm still searching Any idea is welcome :) Bibinsa ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Strange happenings with Bering 1.2
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Roger E McClurg wrote: The first strange thing that happened was that the NICs swapped device IDs. What was eth0 became eth1 and vice versa. I always thought that which NIC became eth0 was BIOS dependent not kernel dependent. The swap did not present a big problem, it is just a curiosity. Has anyone else seen this happen when going from Dachstein 1.02 to Bering 1.2? The NIC numbering is *DRIVER* dependent, although the driver may use methods that are dependent on the motherboard or NIC chipset, BIOS, PC layout (ie ordering of the PCI connectors), MAC addressing of the NICs, or whatever else the device driver writer found handy. Since Bering runs with an updated kernel, I suspect you are encountering an issue with a new (or updated) driver for the NICs you're using. Sounds like it. 3c509 driver (yes this is an ISA card) traditionally used a 3com-specific hardware discovery algorithm that (I think) ordered the interfaces according to the MAC address of the card. A new driver might not be doing that. The second strange thing is a problem. Please understand that this system ran months under Dachstein with no failures, and switching back to Dachstein makes the problem go away. It seems that every time any kind of load is placed on the system (say a 10 meg download), the inside NIC, eth1 a (3Com 3c509), stops responding. If the load stays low, the system runs normally. Do an FTP or pull something of any size down from the Web and eth1 goes away. I have looked in very log file and I can find no error messages. The 3c509 was a very stable driver... if the driver _has_ been messed with, then it could be a problem. The fact that the old setup worked certainly suggests that something has broken in the driver though.. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:19, Lee wrote: Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org Just a heads up. For those that wish to chat about this: confrence.jabber.org Room: leaf -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] LRP
i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it without paying a red cent.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lee Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] LRP Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org Just a heads up. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] LRP
pn] I think June 11, 2001 had more to do with LRP's fade into oblivion than anything else. Funny that he didn't acknowledge that in his comments... --- Matt Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it without paying a red cent.. = - Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is a good place for a tagline. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
Hi Peter, I joined this mailing list quite late and do not know about those things. Could you let us know a little bit more? Thanks. M Lu. - Original Message - From: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: leaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] LRP pn] I think June 11, 2001 had more to do with LRP's fade into oblivion than anything else. Funny that he didn't acknowledge that in his comments... --- Matt Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it without paying a red cent.. = - Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is a good place for a tagline. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 11:34, M Lu wrote: I joined this mailing list quite late and do not know about those things. Could you let us know a little bit more? Everyone, Here is a short history: Date: 2000-05-22 First draft of the Troubleshooting Request HOWTO is posted on the linux-router mailing list. Date: 2000-0?-?? LRP Doc work starts on SourceForge hosted project linuxrouter (group_id=776). Sometime between June and Oct a group of people try to write a user guide for LRP. The group consists of: Brian Boonstra, Mike Noyes, Ray Olszewski, Rick Onanian, Morgan Reed, and Charles Steinkuehler. The project is coordinated on SF project 776 using CVS. It ultimately fails. Most of the content generated during this attempt, is eventually placed in the LEAF project's DocManager. Date: 2000-10-11 Mike Noyes is given project admin rights by Ray Olszewski for SourceForge hosted project linuxrouter (group_id=776). Mike Noyes starts to update site with current files and information. Date: 2000-10-18 Mike Noyes receives a warning from Dave Cinege that he may try to convince VA Linux to (re)move any unofficial LRP work Mike Noyes is doing on SourceForge hosted project linuxrouter (group_id=776). Date: 2000-10-29 SourceForge staff approves LEAF project application. Initial project members are: Charles Steinkuehler, David Douthitt, Mike Noyes, Ray Olszewski, and Rick Onanian. All are given project admin rights. Date: 2000-11-09 SourceForge support request 307837 opened to archive project 776. Date: 2000-12-13 SourceForge Virtual Hosting? support request 309881 submitted. Date 2001-01-?? lrp.c0wz.com and lrp.steinkuehler.net are mirrored on SourceForge. The majority of current content is now available on the LEAF site. Date: 2001-06-11 Dave Cinege uses the linuxrouter.org domain for a idealogical statement. Most LRP developers move to LEAF. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02631.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02632.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02653.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02657.html Date: 2002-03-01 Evolution as a project development model defined. http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg04541.html Date: 2002-07-?? LEAF project mirrors at leaf.steinkuehler.net and leaf.monkeynoodle.org open. Date: 2002-07-15 LEAF domain donated to the project by Steven Peck. New domain is leaf-project.org. -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
Guess Peter referred to the day the death penalty for the man who was found guilty for the bombing in Oklahoma City has been executed. On that day the web page for linuxrouter.org owned by Dave Cinege had been blacked and a questionable comment about the issue. In the following days most of the active mailing list members and LRP/LEAF programmers choosed to leave LRP and concentrate themself on LEAF. The main argument was that Dave misused a technical and project site for a political statement - the comment itself has been treated more carefully in terms of free speach - very american - I appreciated that. Unfortunately the archives of LRP aren't accessible anymore. Hope to made a correct summarize. kp Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 20:34 schrieb M Lu: Hi Peter, I joined this mailing list quite late and do not know about those things. Could you let us know a little bit more? Thanks. M Lu. - Original Message - From: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: leaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] LRP pn] I think June 11, 2001 had more to do with LRP's fade into oblivion than anything else. Funny that he didn't acknowledge that in his comments... --- Matt Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'll say he had some things to say. makes me almost feel bad for using it without paying a red cent.. = - Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is a good place for a tagline. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:39, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Unfortunately the archives of LRP aren't accessible anymore. Message from Dave C. stating the linuxrouter.org site would be down on the 11th. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-routerm=99217136117457w=2 Threads on the 11th and 12th. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-routerr=4b=200106w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-routerr=3b=200106w=2 Hope to made a correct summarize. You did a very good job. :-) -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
--- K.-P. Kirchdörfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guess Peter referred to the day the death penalty for the man who was found guilty for the bombing in Oklahoma City has been executed. On that day the web page for linuxrouter.org owned by Dave Cinege had been blacked and a questionable comment about the issue. In the following days most of the active mailing list members and LRP/LEAF programmers choosed to leave LRP and concentrate themself on LEAF. The main argument was that Dave misused a technical and project site for a political statement - the comment itself has been treated more carefully in terms of free speach - very american - I appreciated that. pn] Hey, I'm all for freedom of speech. He had every right to do what he did on his domain. With that freedom comes responsibility and accountability. I also appreciated the freedom others exercised that day or shortly thereafter. ;) = - Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is a good place for a tagline. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
On Monday 23 June 2003 12:19 pm, Lee wrote: Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org Dave has also replied on Slashdot-comments under the name 'Diesel_Dave'. I made a reply to his post where the comments pertain to LEAF. http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=68562threshold=-1commentsort=0tid=106mode=threadpid=6271817#6274577 -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net http://guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 21:36 schrieb Peter Nosko: --- K.-P. Kirchdörfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guess Peter referred to the day the death penalty for the man who was found guilty for the bombing in Oklahoma City has been executed. On that day the web page for linuxrouter.org owned by Dave Cinege had been blacked and a questionable comment about the issue. In the following days most of the active mailing list members and LRP/LEAF programmers choosed to leave LRP and concentrate themself on LEAF. The main argument was that Dave misused a technical and project site for a political statement - the comment itself has been treated more carefully in terms of free speach - very american - I appreciated that. pn] Hey, I'm all for freedom of speech. He had every right to do what he did on his domain. With that freedom comes responsibility and accountability. I also appreciated the freedom others exercised that day or shortly thereafter. ;) qoud erat demonstrandum kp --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
Dave has also replied on Slashdot-comments under the name 'Diesel_Dave'. I made a reply to his post where the comments pertain to LEAF. Yep. Very good, and well-needed responses. And I just happened to have mod points. I think it's up to +3 now. It's too bad it's so far down the page, though... Wyatt -- Wyatt Draggoo --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead
Mike Noyes wrote: My own departure message from the LRP list, for example, is missing from the archive. I don't know why. While I cannot be sure how much more of that period's traffic is missing from the archive, my memory of those days makes me think that all messages that discussed what Dave actually said on the Web site seem to have been lost somehow. The MARC interface isn't the best. Your post is there. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-routerr=3b=200106w=2 72. 2001-06-13 [2] [LRP]linux-routerPeter Nosko Clicking on the [2] above gets you to a thread listing, where you'll find your post. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=99239774800014r=1w=2 Hi! It can also be found on Geocrawler... http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/303/2001/6/100/5951347/ Have a nice day! Nick --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ext3 on Bering 1.1
mke2fs: error in loading shared libraries libuuid.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Thanks. Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/22/03 8:37:14 PM On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Godfried Duodu wrote: Thanks for the link. Trying to create a filesystem using mke2fs and swap generated error messages. Is there any specific utility to allow that for Bering 1.2? What were the error messages? --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Print Server on Bering 1.2
Loading the lp module produces about 15 lines lines of unresolved symbols as shown below: insmod lp using /lib/modules/lp.o insmod: unresolved symbol mod_use_count_ insmod: unresolved symbol kfree_R801a0af7 insmod: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_RD43c9af4 etc... Any suggestions to help with setting up Bering 1.2 as a print server. Thanks. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LRP
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:47, Mike Noyes wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 10:19, Lee wrote: Dave Cinege has written some comments at http://www.linuxrouter.org Just a heads up. For those that wish to chat about this: confrence.jabber.org Room: leaf Everyone, Jabber didn't work well for a chat room, so I just registered an IRC channel for us on SlashNET. This channel will be for project member discussion. All support requests will be redirected to our user list. irc.slashnet.org #leaf -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: Print Server on Bering 1.2
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Godfried Duodu wrote: Loading the lp module produces about 15 lines lines of unresolved symbols as shown below: insmod lp using /lib/modules/lp.o insmod: unresolved symbol mod_use_count_ insmod: unresolved symbol kfree_R801a0af7 insmod: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_RD43c9af4 etc... Any suggestions to help with setting up Bering 1.2 as a print server. when one module depends on another, you can usually find out about this by looking in the modules.dep file that came with the compiled modules you are looking at. In this case, lp.o depends on parport.o. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Windows VPN newbie
I have network neighborhood browsing working across subnets, through a VPN tunnel. It required two SAMBA pdcs, one on each subnet. Cross subnet browsing, as has been stated before, requires a pdc on each subnet with wins support turned on, and remote browse sync set up. Once I had two SAMBA servers, it was relatively painless. begin quoting S Mohan : Windows network neighbourhood browsing is based on Netbios. It works fine on a homogenous Windows LAN and Samba. I could not get it working across LANs bridged using TCP/IP. I once (in 1999) had a TCP/IP RAS box for inbound dial up connectivity to a LAN. Browsing did not work. However, using the dial in facility to a modem on the NT server running NT RAS services gave this facility. No change on client or server side. I doubt if you can achieve what you want over IPSEC links. Will stand corrected if any one else had been able to get it working. Mohan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Steinkuehler Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 10:13 AM To: Jaime Nebrera Herrera Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Windows VPN newbie Jaime Nebrera Herrera wrote: Hi all, I want to stablish a net to net VPN using Bering as a gateway. On both ends will have windows machines :( They want to see both nets as a whole, with all computers (remember windows) showing in the explorer, so they can access a shared hard disk from both sites. I want to do this the easiest and cheapest way. Options considering: 1) If possible use only one PC on each end. I dont know if they have a WNT or W200 server that could act as a WINS server, but adding a linux (or a couple of) just for WINS is not desirable unless there is no other way (higher price and complexity). 2) How bad isfor security adding WINS (samba) in the gateway? 3) Even better, is really necesary to have a WINS service? I know that for IP services (http, ftp) there is no need for it, but the user just want to see the whole as if there was no separation in the middle :) A WINS server gets you name resolution, but it does *NOT* provide cross-subnet browsing (the official term for what you describe you're wanting), although it's typically a required piece of most cross-subnet browsing setups. 4) What option is better, PPTP or FreeSWAN? Remember, both in the gateway/firewall. Do I need WINS if I use PPTP? FreeS/WAN is better (from a security standpoint). Using PPTP may work easier for browsing, but I've never tried to set this up, so I'm not sure what features/limitations PPTP provides (other than a pretty much guaranteed lack of security from anyone actually interested in reading your data...PPTP will secure you from the idly curious, but not anyone actually wanting to break into your VPN). I know this are very basic questions, is there any good online documentation about this topics? Very thankful in advance. Regards. I'm not a windows networking guru, but have been through enough of trying to link remote windows networks to help out with a few issues. First of all, I suggest trying to setup a subnet-subnet IPSec VPN link between your two firewalls. This reduces the problem to getting windows boxes to talk to each other across a router. There are two aspects of the windows portion of the problem: 1) Sharing network resources across subnets 2) Browsing network resources across subnets Note that these are *VERY* differnet problems. Browsing on MS networks typically works by using broadcast traffic, which won't pass through your router/firewall/VPN appliance. Drive mapping, however, can be done directly using IP addresses, DNS names (if you have entries for the system(s) in a zone file or in your hosts file), WINS name, etc. If you can get by with manually mapping drives instead of browsing (ie manually typing in an IP or computer name rather than clicking the proper computer from a tree view with the mouse), what you want is very simple...just get the VPN link running, and type \\192.168.1.44 (or whatever the appropriate far-end IP is) when you're trying to map a network drive or printer. If, however, you want to browse to the remote resouce, you have a much bigger problem. The official microsoft way to do this is to run 2K server (probably .net server by now) on *EACH* subnet. You eliminate the server install on one side of the network if you have all systems log into the same domain controller (requires a WINS server for name resolution, and proper configuration of the remote systems so they know how to find the WINS server on the far subnet...this can be setup via dhcp, so it's really not too bad). The Microsoft site has a lot more info on what's required to implement this in the approved way...a search for cross subnet browsing
Re: [leaf-user] ext3 on Bering 1.1
mke2fs: error in loading shared libraries libuuid.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Thanks. Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/22/03 8:37:14 PM On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Godfried Duodu wrote: Thanks for the link. Trying to create a filesystem using mke2fs and swap generated error messages. Is there any specific utility to allow that for Bering 1.2? What were the error messages? --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: Print Server on Bering 1.2
I do have parport and parport_pc modules loading prior to lp as stated in the doc. Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/23/03 5:57:01 PM On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Godfried Duodu wrote: Loading the lp module produces about 15 lines lines of unresolved symbols as shown below: insmod lp using /lib/modules/lp.o insmod: unresolved symbol mod_use_count_ insmod: unresolved symbol kfree_R801a0af7 insmod: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_RD43c9af4 etc... Any suggestions to help with setting up Bering 1.2 as a print server. when one module depends on another, you can usually find out about this by looking in the modules.dep file that came with the compiled modules you are looking at. In this case, lp.o depends on parport.o. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] (no subject)
Godfried, Check out http://plug.twuug.org/articles/rescuedisk.html One of these bootable images can be used to fdisk and Mke2fs your drive which can then be mounted under Bering. I just used the one at http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/ to convert my ext2 to ext3 by creating a journal on the partition. Hope this helps, Kory Krofft On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 11:58:19 -0100 (GMT+1), Jørn Eriksen wrote: Hello there, U could use this one: http://leaf.sf.net//devel/thc/files/kwarchive/fdisk.lrp Best regards Jorn Good morning! what utility is there in bering 1.2 to allow me to use fdisk and partition my Hdisk? I have laready installed bering on the dos partition on the drive. Hdsupp.lrp did not help me. Godfried Duodu (713)802-5146 fax # (713}802-5140 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] LRP
political statement - the comment itself has been treated more carefully in terms of free speach - very american - I appreciated that. pn] Hey, I'm all for freedom of speech. He had every right to do what he did on his domain. With that freedom comes responsibility and accountability. I also appreciated the freedom others exercised that day or shortly thereafter. ;) And your right to Freedom of Association. As did I. Tony --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: Print Server on Bering 1.2
Can you send us the complete 15 lines of error message? And also the output of lsmod and dmesg? Eg log in as root and type: lsmod /root/godfriedlp.txt followed by dmesg /root/godfriedlp.txt The print server document was written around two Bering 1.1 machines so I can't claim to have seen what the 1.2 kernel and modules output when they load. At 06:33 PM 6/23/03 -0500, you wrote: I do have parport and parport_pc modules loading prior to lp as stated in the doc. Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/23/03 5:57:01 PM On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Godfried Duodu wrote: Loading the lp module produces about 15 lines lines of unresolved symbols as shown below: insmod lp using /lib/modules/lp.o insmod: unresolved symbol mod_use_count_ insmod: unresolved symbol kfree_R801a0af7 insmod: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_RD43c9af4 etc... Any suggestions to help with setting up Bering 1.2 as a print server. when one module depends on another, you can usually find out about this by looking in the modules.dep file that came with the compiled modules you are looking at. In this case, lp.o depends on parport.o. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
