Re: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread George Metz


Michelle Konzack wrote:

No I have not...

because I curently no running SLINK-System (HD crash) 
and can not build new LRP 2.9.4 Packages... 
You could try the windows port of it, WinDump. It runs on 
Win9x/ME/NT/2K/XP, and only requires a (freely available) single file 
in addition to itself.

http://windump.polito.it/



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread Michelle Konzack
Arg

Am 02:44 2003-07-21 -0400 hat George Metz geschrieben:

You could try the windows port of it, WinDump. It runs on 
Win9x/ME/NT/2K/XP, and only requires a (freely available) single file 
in addition to itself.

Cry, howl... I don't want to install 32-Bit-Windows !!!

http://windump.polito.it/

No chance !!!
I have not Win9x and encore plus merdique... 

Michelle

-- 
Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
+--+
| Michelle's Internet-ServiceInh.  Michelle Konzack|
| FunkLAN-Providerin   |
+--+



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread Tony
And I'm resending this one as well





OK, you need libpcap.lrp, and you can get that here:
http://leaf-project.org/devel/ddouthitt/packages/

and you can grab the tcpdump.lrp in the same directory.

That should set you up

Tony


 -Original Message-
 From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:07 PM
 To: Tony
 Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...


 Am 12:52 2003-07-20 -0400 hat Tony geschrieben:
 
 Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar to see where they are
 originating from, where they are going and what ports are involved?
 
 Tony

 tcpdump on LRP 2.9.4 ???
 Is there a tcpdump.lrp ?

 Hmmm, not that I know.

 Michelle

 --
 Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
+--+
| Michelle's Internet-ServiceInh.  Michelle Konzack|
| FunkLAN-Providerin   |
+--+



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread Tony
I am resending this message,
but including the group as well this time.





http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/packages-list.html

as long as the glibc library is the same (2.0.7), I don't see why any of
these wouldn't work.

I think you need another library, but I can't remember which one.  Same
rules apply though.  I'd install it and see what it complains about not
being installed, then grab that.

Tony



 -Original Message-
 From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:07 PM
 To: Tony
 Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...


 Am 12:52 2003-07-20 -0400 hat Tony geschrieben:
 
 Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar to see where they are
 originating from, where they are going and what ports are involved?
 
 Tony

 tcpdump on LRP 2.9.4 ???
 Is there a tcpdump.lrp ?

 Hmmm, not that I know.

 Michelle

 --
 Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
+--+
| Michelle's Internet-ServiceInh.  Michelle Konzack|
| FunkLAN-Providerin   |
+--+



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread eric wolzak
Hello Michelle


I have disconnected all 5 Switches from the router and it continue to
log alone... So there is no problem with my Network which is working
for years...

But what can make this traffic !!!

All 90-150 seconds I have around 5-12 packages TX and 2-4 packages RX

So the request must come from the firewall.
And this is probably a  dns issue , or you see theLCP echo  LCP
echo-reply  Packets sendet over the line.
You can look at what packages are send by setting the pppd options to
kdebug
debug 7
Now everything sent out ppp0 will be logged, by tail -f  /var/log/messages
or /var/log/syslog
You might see what kind of packages are going out and or where they come
from

Regards
eric Wolzak
member of the Bering Crew



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] LEAF doing some DAC stuff

2003-07-21 Thread Jon Clausen
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:21:28AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
 Matt Schalit wrote:

   http://bund.dk/blinder

 That's awesome.  Really good stuff.  Close to what I
 was posting about.  You even have some sort of
 rudimentary input, the kill switches you added to
 the blinds.

Thanks :)

 Charles hasn't posted on this thread, but he may not
 have seen it.  Too bad because he built a Battle Bot
 and has quite a bit of computer interfacing
 experience.
 
 OK, OK...hint taken. :)

:D
 
 I got in A's in Analog Lab, Digital Lab, and in Computer
 Interfacing, but he's actually doing it in real life
 having to deal with Voltage converters, grounding planes,
 filters, the whole gamut.  How much fun is that?

A lot?

 What's cool about the GP-3 is that it does the stepper
 motor control already, along with tons of other good
 stuff.  I was sort of surprised it was only $35 US.
 I could run a farm with that little thing.
 
 For cheap  easy DAC output from your PC, use the pre-existing ports. 

I was unemployed at the time, so reason #1 weighed heavily. I wouldn't
really have agreed with #2 at the time, but then, I don't know squat about
electronics. (Sure I can solder, but...)

 The audio output ports for dynamic signals (although you won't typically 
 get DC output levels without shorting across the output caps and adding 
 some level-shifting circuitry to deal with the typical 1.5-2.5 V offset).

I would have thought exactly that; If it needs to become analog, why not use
a soundcard?
 
 NOTE:  If you really want to smoothly drive stepper moters with a PC, 
 you either need smart hardware or you'll quickly find out why linux (and 
 most other general purpose OS's) are not considered real-time.  The 
 stepper motors will *NOT* be happy when the pulses don't come out at 
 exactly the wrong time, and you *WILL* notice the glitch in smooth 
 movement, by feel and/or by sound.  A bit of timing uncertiancy is not 
 that bad (especially if you can compensate for it with the software 
 generating the drive waveforms...motors have a *MUCH* slower response 
 time than modern CPUs), but you can't just call the system sleep routine 
 for a time delay and expect nice, clean waveform timing on output.

Actually sleep comes in too large chunks. What I do is read the parallelport
a calculated number of times per 'full-sequence', to get the slowdown. I
read somewhere that this read takes approx. X microseconds so I just
multiplied X by so and so much. It's not actually that precise, but at 5:30
in the morning, believe me, I don't notice ;)

 This is really an instance where a $2 8-bit MCU with a couple of PWM or 
 timer outputs can solve a problem better than a GHz+ CPU. :)

Well... In this particular case (a ~25 MHz 486) I doubt it will ever be
smooth as in silk... But it's not really that important for this
application.

   I just picked up development a couple of days ago. Basically the bit 
   drives the stepper motor is a script that pushes out bit-sequences of 
   parallelport. But being a script (and not particularly well written, at
   that) it makes for some jerky motion of the motor, which I think is in 
   responsible for the two mechanical failures it has suffered in the year 
   been running. (Plastic fatique).
 
 See NOTE:, above.

Noted.
 
 I sort of thought that you just tell those stepper motors
 to slew and use an infra-red transmitter/pickup system that
 counts the times the IR beam is interrupted as it shines through
 the slits in the stepper's axel mounted circular disk.

On the contrary, as Charles explains below;

 And I thought you pretty much used the stepping feature
 for fine positioning
 
 Stepper motors require proper sequencing of the drive waveforms.  They 
 are not real picky about signal timing if they're not actually moving 
 very fast, but you *DO* need to provide for acceleration/deceleration 
 ramping and if the motor is actually rotating with any speed, it will 
 not react well to out of phase drive signals, potentially putting lots 
 of strain on the drive electronics and/or mechanical drive system.

Ramping... Never thought of that... That's a very nice piece of input. I
shall keep it in mind, when I get around to the testruns of the binary I'm
building. I'm pretty anxious to see how fast full-tilt is going to be ;)

 Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the stepping feature only being 
 used for fine positioning.  You *HAVE* to step stepper motors...that's 
 how they work.  You can't simply hook a stepper motor up to power and 
 get it to turn (at least not more than one step).  Getting a stepper 
 motor to rotate *REQUIRES* a properly timed dynamic drive signal.
 
 If you're referring to micro-stepping, or driving the stepper coils 
 with something other than full voltage, this technique is useful even if 
 you don't need it for fine positioning.  If you think about how a 
 stepper motor works, the steps correspond to different arrangements of 
 the drive coils being fully 

[leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 2nd floppy

2003-07-21 Thread RS Peterson
I finally have a working ppp(dial-up) connection using straight outa the box 
Bering.  Everything works, except:
**  I cannot complete the load from the 2nd floppy.  The install seems to cut 
off mid flight.  Here is the syslinux.cfg I am using (all in one line 
starting with 'default'):
--
display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp log_size=4M syst_size=10M init=/linuxrc rw 
root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0
u1680,/dev/fd1u1680 
LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,weblet,netutils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk
ey
--
Everthing from tcpdump on is located on the 2nd floppy.  Some of it loads 
depending on the what is included in the line preceding the *.lrp files.  The 
install just cuts off, sometimes calling a file by it's sliced off name, ie, 
'tcp (nf!)' then skips the rest.

Things noticed/tried:
**  If I move the log_size and syst_size above, thus: 
--
display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
append log_size=4096
append syst_size=10240
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp init=/linuxrc rw root=/dev/ram0 
boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0 
u1680,/dev/fd1u1680LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,weblet,netutils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk
ey
---
then only the syst_size gets set up, it ignores log_size.
** I have also tried 'append ramdisk_size= **' to no avail.
** I have tried shuffling the deck (changing the order of the appends) (only 
last one gets set up.
** I have tried combination of 'append' and contained inside the 'default' 
line.  Still doesn't work.
** If I do not set up syst_size I run out of RAM and cannot complete the 
install.
** Do I need to explictly set up extra 'ramdisk_size' or does 'syst_size' do 
the same?

Here's the big question:
** I appears that 'syslinux.cfg' has a max line length.  When I cross that 
limit, nothing after gets installed.  Is there a line length limit? and how 
do I deal with?

Things checked:
I have scoured the syslinux site for 'syslinux.cfg' helps.  Just the basics, 
no details or examples.  

Here's hoping someone can help me out.  Thanks.  -- Bob Peterson

-- 
Robert S. Peterson
31 N Alfred, Elgin IL  60123  USA
847/697-6491
Compass Adjusting for Lake Michigan navigators since 1985
Physics @ Bartlett HS
e-mail: rpeterson(at)enc.k12.il.us


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 2nd floppy

2003-07-21 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Lenght limit is 254 characters.
Use lrpkg.cfg instead to define your packages.

kp

Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:01 schrieb RS Peterson:
 I finally have a working ppp(dial-up) connection using straight outa the
 box Bering.  Everything works, except:
 **  I cannot complete the load from the 2nd floppy.  The install seems to
 cut off mid flight.  Here is the syslinux.cfg I am using (all in one line
 starting with 'default'):
 --
 display syslinux.dpy
 timeout 0
 default linux initrd=initrd.lrp log_size=4M syst_size=10M init=/linuxrc rw
 root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0
 u1680,/dev/fd1u1680
 LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,weblet,netu
tils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk ey
 --
 Everthing from tcpdump on is located on the 2nd floppy.  Some of it loads
 depending on the what is included in the line preceding the *.lrp files. 
 The install just cuts off, sometimes calling a file by it's sliced off
 name, ie, 'tcp (nf!)' then skips the rest.

 Things noticed/tried:
 **  If I move the log_size and syst_size above, thus:
 --
 display syslinux.dpy
 timeout 0
 append log_size=4096
 append syst_size=10240
 default linux initrd=initrd.lrp init=/linuxrc rw root=/dev/ram0
 boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0
 u1680,/dev/fd1u1680LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,d
nscache,weblet,netutils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk ey
 ---
 then only the syst_size gets set up, it ignores log_size.
 ** I have also tried 'append ramdisk_size= **' to no avail.
 ** I have tried shuffling the deck (changing the order of the appends)
 (only last one gets set up.
 ** I have tried combination of 'append' and contained inside the 'default'
 line.  Still doesn't work.
 ** If I do not set up syst_size I run out of RAM and cannot complete the
 install.
 ** Do I need to explictly set up extra 'ramdisk_size' or does 'syst_size'
 do the same?

 Here's the big question:
 ** I appears that 'syslinux.cfg' has a max line length.  When I cross that
 limit, nothing after gets installed.  Is there a line length limit? and how
 do I deal with?

 Things checked:
 I have scoured the syslinux site for 'syslinux.cfg' helps.  Just the
 basics, no details or examples.

 Here's hoping someone can help me out.  Thanks.  -- Bob Peterson



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Routing problem with Bering

2003-07-21 Thread Barry O'Hare
Hi,
I am running a customised Bering release as a wireless router.
Clients connect via an orinoco wireless card (using HermesAP) via eth1 
(10.9.2.1) (dhcpd is giving out addresses on this interface)
eth0 (10.9.1.5) is a 3c509 connected to the internal network. The 
internet gateway is 10.9.1.1 on the internal network.
From the Leaf box I can ping any address on the internal 10.9.1.0 
network, including the internet gateway and internet addresses.
From the Leaf box I can also ping any address in the external eth1 network.
However, from the internet gateway box I can only ping eth0 (10.9.1.5) 
on the Leaf box and can't ping eth1(10.9.2.1)
From a laptop (10.9.2.2) wirelessly connected to eth1 I can ping 
10.9.2.1(eth1) and 10.9.1.5(eth0) but cannot ping the internet gateway 
10.9.1.1 or any internet addresses.

I think I may have an issue with the netmask / masklen. I'm also not 
familiar with the CIDR format of netmasking.
I'm eager to dump all my M$ boxes and make the transition to Leaf based 
solutions :-)
Any ideas on this would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance
Barry
Details below :

Linux 2.4.20 #1 Mon Jun 23 23:05:36 IST 2003 i586 unknown

# ip add show
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
   link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:10:4b:b4:3e:69 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.9.1.5/24 brd 10.9.1.255 scope global eth0
5: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:02:2d:2a:4b:a8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.9.2.1/24 brd 10.9.2.255 scope global eth1
# ip route show
10.9.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.9.2.1
10.9.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.9.1.5
default via 10.9.1.1 dev eth0






---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 2nd floppy

2003-07-21 Thread John Wittenberg
Bob,

Are you using a single floppy drive or two floppy drives? In your 
syslinux.cfg, you have the second floppy drive identified as a 1680 format.  
Is the second floppy formatted as 1680 or 1440?  If you are using a single 
floppy drive, you need to look at the Bering User's Guide, Chapter 11.2, 
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bubooting.html.

I hope this helps,

John


From: RS Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LEAFuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 2nd 
floppy
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:01:47 -0500

I finally have a working ppp(dial-up) connection using straight outa the 
box
Bering.  Everything works, except:
**  I cannot complete the load from the 2nd floppy.  The install seems to 
cut
off mid flight.  Here is the syslinux.cfg I am using (all in one line
starting with 'default'):
--
display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp log_size=4M syst_size=10M init=/linuxrc rw
root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0
u1680,/dev/fd1u1680
LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,weblet,netutils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk
ey
--
Everthing from tcpdump on is located on the 2nd floppy.  Some of it loads
depending on the what is included in the line preceding the *.lrp files.  
The
install just cuts off, sometimes calling a file by it's sliced off name, 
ie,
'tcp (nf!)' then skips the rest.

Things noticed/tried:
**  If I move the log_size and syst_size above, thus:
--
display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
append log_size=4096
append syst_size=10240
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp init=/linuxrc rw root=/dev/ram0
boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0
u1680,/dev/fd1u1680LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,weblet,netutils,tcpdump,libz,sftp,ssh,sshd,sshk
ey
---
then only the syst_size gets set up, it ignores log_size.
** I have also tried 'append ramdisk_size= **' to no avail.
** I have tried shuffling the deck (changing the order of the appends) 
(only
last one gets set up.
** I have tried combination of 'append' and contained inside the 'default'
line.  Still doesn't work.
** If I do not set up syst_size I run out of RAM and cannot complete the
install.
** Do I need to explictly set up extra 'ramdisk_size' or does 'syst_size' 
do
the same?

Here's the big question:
** I appears that 'syslinux.cfg' has a max line length.  When I cross that
limit, nothing after gets installed.  Is there a line length limit? and how
do I deal with?
Things checked:
I have scoured the syslinux site for 'syslinux.cfg' helps.  Just the 
basics,
no details or examples.

Here's hoping someone can help me out.  Thanks.  -- Bob Peterson

--
Robert S. Peterson
31 N Alfred, Elgin IL  60123  USA
847/697-6491
Compass Adjusting for Lake Michigan navigators since 1985
Physics @ Bartlett HS
e-mail: rpeterson(at)enc.k12.il.us
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] PCMCIA... Again...

2003-07-21 Thread Homer Parker
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:23:24 +0200 Jacques Nilo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

 Andre, Homer, list:
 The chapter about orinoco drivers has been updated together with the 
 pcmcia_orinoco.lrp package.
 I hope that will work for you and make things clearer.
 http://leaf.sf.net/doc/guide/buwireless.html
 http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.2/packages/pcmcia_orinoco.lrp

Sorry so late with the reply, it's been a Monday... Ok, here's what I
have now:

/etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp

auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.2.151
masklen 24

iface eth2 inet static
address 192.168.4.121
masklen 24
broadcast 192.168.4.255
wireless_channel 1
wireless_freq 2.412
wireless_mode ad-hoc
wireless_essid HomersHut
wireless_key 6f77-6973-70

Which produces these results:

firewall: -root-
# ip addr
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:00:24:c0:9c:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.120/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:00:24:c0:9c:1d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.2.151/24 scope global eth1
5: eth2: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:02:2d:5e:76:2f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.4.121/24 brd 192.168.4.255 scope global eth2

firewall: -root-
# ip route
192.168.4.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.4.121
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.151
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.120
default via 192.168.1.254 dev eth0

firewall: -root-
# iwconfig
lono wireless extensions.

dummy0no wireless extensions.

eth0  no wireless extensions.

eth1  no wireless extensions.

eth2  IEEE 802.11-DS  ESSID:HomersHut  Nickname:HERMES I
Mode:Ad-Hoc  Frequency:2.437GHz  Cell: 8E:00:BC:03:36:03
 Bit Rate:11Mb/s   Tx-Power=15 dBm   Sensitivity:1/3
Retry limit:4   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:6F77-6973-70
Power Management:off
Link Quality:0  Signal level:0  Noise level:0
Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:16
Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0

firewall: -root-
# ping 192.168.4.122
PING 192.168.4.122 (192.168.4.122): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted

firewall: -root-
#

I've tried changing the channel and the frequency, and it still doesn't
listen (If I really wanted abuse like that, I've got 6 kids that will do
tha tfor me) :( And, judging by the ping results, something isn't
right :( Here's the modules loaded:

firewall: -root-  
 
# lsmod   
#  
Module PagesUsed by
orinoco_cs  4580   1
orinoco31596   0 [orinoco_cs]
hermes  4960   0 [orinoco_cs orinoco]
ds  6796   1 [orinoco_cs]
i82365 27044   1
pcmcia_core41088   0 [orinoco_cs ds i82365]
ip_nat_irc  2176   0 (unused)
ip_nat_ftp  2784   0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_irc2880   1
ip_conntrack_ftp3648   1
natsemi10220   2
pci-scan3532   1 [natsemi]
ide-probe-mod   8476   0
ide-disk9304   0
ide-mod63076   0 [ide-probe-mod ide-disk]

I can also post log file excerpts if that will help, but there's no
errors in them.. How can I tell what isn't talking to what? I can ping out
the eth0 interface just fine.. 

--- 
Homer Parker  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
  \ / No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.homershut.net   x  No Word docs in email
telnet://bbs.homershut.net/ \ Respect for open standards

Bill Gates reports on security progress made and the challenges ahead.
-- Microsoft's Homepage, on the day an SQL Server bug crippled large
   sections of the Internet.


 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] PCMCIA... Again...

2003-07-21 Thread Andre Luiz de Miranda
Homer,

are you using shorewall module ?

Andre

Homer Parker wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:23:24 +0200 Jacques Nilo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 

Andre, Homer, list:
The chapter about orinoco drivers has been updated together with the 
pcmcia_orinoco.lrp package.
I hope that will work for you and make things clearer.
http://leaf.sf.net/doc/guide/buwireless.html
http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.2/packages/pcmcia_orinoco.lrp
   

Sorry so late with the reply, it's been a Monday... Ok, here's what I
have now:
/etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.2.151
masklen 24
iface eth2 inet static
address 192.168.4.121
masklen 24
broadcast 192.168.4.255
wireless_channel 1
wireless_freq 2.412
wireless_mode ad-hoc
wireless_essid HomersHut
wireless_key 6f77-6973-70
	Which produces these results:

firewall: -root-
# ip addr
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop
   link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:00:24:c0:9c:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 192.168.1.120/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:00:24:c0:9c:1d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 192.168.2.151/24 scope global eth1
5: eth2: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:02:2d:5e:76:2f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 192.168.4.121/24 brd 192.168.4.255 scope global eth2
firewall: -root-
# ip route
192.168.4.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.4.121
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.151
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.120
default via 192.168.1.254 dev eth0
firewall: -root-
# iwconfig
lono wireless extensions.
dummy0no wireless extensions.

eth0  no wireless extensions.

eth1  no wireless extensions.

eth2  IEEE 802.11-DS  ESSID:HomersHut  Nickname:HERMES I
Mode:Ad-Hoc  Frequency:2.437GHz  Cell: 8E:00:BC:03:36:03
Bit Rate:11Mb/s   Tx-Power=15 dBm   Sensitivity:1/3
Retry limit:4   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:6F77-6973-70
Power Management:off
Link Quality:0  Signal level:0  Noise level:0
Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:16
Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0
firewall: -root-
# ping 192.168.4.122
PING 192.168.4.122 (192.168.4.122): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
firewall: -root-
#
I've tried changing the channel and the frequency, and it still doesn't
listen (If I really wanted abuse like that, I've got 6 kids that will do
tha tfor me) :( And, judging by the ping results, something isn't
right :( Here's the modules loaded:
firewall: -root-  

# lsmod   
#  
Module PagesUsed by
orinoco_cs  4580   1
orinoco31596   0 [orinoco_cs]
hermes  4960   0 [orinoco_cs orinoco]
ds  6796   1 [orinoco_cs]
i82365 27044   1
pcmcia_core41088   0 [orinoco_cs ds i82365]
ip_nat_irc  2176   0 (unused)
ip_nat_ftp  2784   0 (unused)
ip_conntrack_irc2880   1
ip_conntrack_ftp3648   1
natsemi10220   2
pci-scan3532   1 [natsemi]
ide-probe-mod   8476   0
ide-disk9304   0
ide-mod63076   0 [ide-probe-mod ide-disk]

	I can also post log file excerpts if that will help, but there's no
errors in them.. How can I tell what isn't talking to what? I can ping out
the eth0 interface just fine.. 

--- 
Homer Parker  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 \ / No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.homershut.net   x  No Word docs in email
telnet://bbs.homershut.net/ \ Respect for open standards

Bill Gates reports on security progress made and the challenges ahead.
-- Microsoft's Homepage, on the day an SQL Server bug crippled large
  sections of the Internet.




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 






Re: [leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 2nd floppy

2003-07-21 Thread John Wittenberg
Bob,

I haven't tried using two floppy drives, but when booting from a floppy to a 
CD, I use the lrpkg.cfg file to list all my packages.  By putting the list 
of packages in lrpkg.cfg (do not need LRP=), you are not limited by the 255 
character limit.

The 255 character limit discussion is buried in the Bering User's Guide 
chapter 11.5, http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bubooting.html, under 
*Booting from a CD-Rom with isolinux*.  I currently use Dachstein CD and 
boot from a floppy, but have been experimenting with a Bering CD, booting 
from a floppy.

Maybe this will solve your problem.  If not, maybe one of the more 
knowledgeable people will know the answer.

John


From: RS Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Wittenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED], LEAFuser 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] syslinux.cfg: line length limit? -- incomplete 
2nd floppy
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:19:51 -0500

I'm using two floppy drives, both formated to 1680.  If I can get the line
length down, it will attempt to load more from the 2nd floppy, until it 
hits
the line length limit.  Surely others have run up against a similar issue
with two fd's and ppp0 -- eth0.  Thanks.  -- Bob

On Monday 21 July 2003 03:55 pm, John Wittenberg wrote:
 Bob,

 Are you using a single floppy drive or two floppy drives? In your
 syslinux.cfg, you have the second floppy drive identified as a 1680 
format.
 Is the second floppy formatted as 1680 or 1440?
--
Robert S. Peterson
31 N Alfred, Elgin IL  60123  USA
847/697-6491
Compass Adjusting for Lake Michigan navigators since 1985
Physics @ Bartlett HS
e-mail: rpeterson(at)enc.k12.il.us

---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Migration from Dachstein to Bering

2003-07-21 Thread tmassey




Hello!

I've finally bit the bullet and decided to migrate from Dachstein to
Bering.  I'm about 2/3 of the way through.  I have a couple of questions:

1) Which is the better platform to build on, Bering or uClibBering?  I'd
rather stay with the most stable, tested and long-lasting version.  Why the
two different versions?

2) With Dachstein, we had the One Large File(TM) technique of
configuration.  This had disadvantages (it's pretty far from a normal Linux
configuration, and adding parameters that the system did not envision is
not always easy), but it had many advantages, too.  Most notably, for the
most part you could set a setting once and it would be used everywhere.
This is not true in Bering.  I've already found near a dozen places where I
have had to change hard-coded IP addresses because I prefer using 10.
addresses internally instead of 192.168 addresses

Wouldn't it be possible to implement a way to define commonly used items
(your internal and external IP addresses, netmasks, gateways, etc.) in a
single location and have the bulk of the configuration files work with it?
Or does that require the One Large File technique?

Anyway, so far so good with migration.  Now it's on to IPsec configuration!
Joy!  :)

Thank you very much for any thoughts you might have regarding this.  I
greatly appreciate your help.

Tim Massey



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] on Bering PCMCIA packages

2003-07-21 Thread Victor Berdin
Hi Jacques, anyone concerned,

I looked into the Bering pcmcia packages, specifically the 
pcmcia_orinoco.lrp. To those who would like to have 
wireless and network settings take effect during initial startup
(and hot swapping), I find that this can be done by using 
wireless and wireless.opts or something similar that must be
called upon by /etc/pcmcia/network script. 

An /etc/init.d/pcmcia rc call that's earlier than 
/etc/init.d/networking must also be implemented. The object of
the early rc call is to have the needed pcmcia modules to load
ahead of /etc/init.d/networking. 

The pcmcia cardmgr may also be regarded as a module loader 
for pcmcia device, hence, I think it's logical to have it load 
close with /etc/init.d/modutils.

Then lastly, a call to /etc/init.d/networking start (or something
similar) may be used in replace of the ifup $DEVICE line
in /etc/pcmcia/network start clause. With my DS 1.02, I used
networking ifup $DEVICE.

Having all of the above, while a card already inserted, I'm
able to have both wireless and network settings take effect
during initial machine start-up. This is also true during hot 
swapping of wireless cards.


Regards, Vic



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] *.lrp(nf!) - when packages are loaded

2003-07-21 Thread Dominik Strnad
Hello I am using Bearing 1.2, booting from flash.

I add few *.lrp packages to be loaded. Last one - and doesn't matter which -
its everytime the last one, is shown with (nf!) mark and it isn't loaded to
the system.

I thought that this was due to small syst_size so I extend it in
syslinux.cfg:

display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp syst_size=32M log_size=8M init=/linuxrc rw
root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/hda1 PKGPATH=/dev/hda1
LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,keyboard,shorwall,ulogd,wireless,wir
eutil,netutils,dhcpd,maradns,libz,sshd,sftp,weblet,ntpsimpl,ntpdate


But I stil getting same error when loading - in this case - package ntpdate.

Here are free and df command from my router:

litin: -root-
# free
  total used free   shared  buffers
  Mem:9542811512839160   76
 Swap:000
Total:954281151283916

litin: -root-
# df
Filesystem   1k-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root32768  6004 26764  18% /
tmpfs4771220 47692   0% /tmp
tmpfs 819248  8144   1% /var/log
/dev/hda117695  3513 14182  20% /mnt


as you can see /dev/root - 32MB, is used only from 18%.

Please what is wrong?

Linuxsrc ramdisk values are in default:

#   Adjust if needed 
#  1/ Max size of unpacked LRP files
SYSTSIZE=6M
#  2/ Max size of /var/log directory
LOGSIZE=2M

Regards


Litin




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] *.lrp(nf!) - when packages are loaded

2003-07-21 Thread M Lu
I do not run with flash but seems that it is the limitation of syslinux.cfg 
size for one line (255 chars or something like that).

I run from CD and I use 'lrpkg.cfg' for the packages to load instead of 
syslinux.cfg.

Look at the documentation for details.

I hope that helps.

M Lu.


From: Dominik Strnad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] *.lrp(nf!) - when packages are loaded
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:01:42 +0200
Hello I am using Bearing 1.2, booting from flash.

I add few *.lrp packages to be loaded. Last one - and doesn't matter which 
-
its everytime the last one, is shown with (nf!) mark and it isn't loaded to
the system.

I thought that this was due to small syst_size so I extend it in
syslinux.cfg:
display syslinux.dpy
timeout 0
default linux initrd=initrd.lrp syst_size=32M log_size=8M init=/linuxrc rw
root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/hda1 PKGPATH=/dev/hda1
LRP=root,etc,local,modules,iptables,ppp,keyboard,shorwall,ulogd,wireless,wir
eutil,netutils,dhcpd,maradns,libz,sshd,sftp,weblet,ntpsimpl,ntpdate
But I stil getting same error when loading - in this case - package 
ntpdate.

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] utelnetd - All network ports in use

2003-07-21 Thread Mariano Drzazga
Eric, 

Thanks for the tip, I followed your (and Kp) advice and I try to make it
work with Dropbear. But again I have some problem related with pty's.

I follow the steps in the readme file of the dropbear package, I
generated the keys, and I started the server.
Now, when I connect with a ssh client (I tried Putty and SecureCRT) I
get the following error in the auth.log file :

pty_allocate: openpty: No such file or directory.

Sorry for my ignorance on this kind of things (ttys, pty, pts, etc), but
I can't realize where is my problem (and my limit knowledge says to me
that it's related with the problem that mentioned before with utelnetd).


And at this time I used all the orginal software (I mean that I used the
orginal Bering 2.0 image without making any changes)

What I am missing?

Thanks again!

Regards,

Mariano



-Mensaje original-
De: Eric Spakman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: Domingo, 20 de Julio de 2003 06:54
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [leaf-user] utelnetd - All network ports in use


Mariano,

I'm not sure what the problem is, but it looks like you are using a 
wrong uClibc config file. You can find the config file we are using 
at:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/src/bering-
uclibc/configs/uclibc/0.9.20/

or follow the link in: 
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=91018page_id=52

One of the differences between this config and the default uClibc 
config is that we don't use /dev/pts in Bering (_uClibc), it looks 
like you are hitting this.

But like Kp asked you, why don't you use dropbear? It's a small and 
_save_ way to connect to your Bering_uClibc router.

Regards,
Eric Spakman
Member of the Bering_uClibc team

 Hi!
 
 I've compiled the utelnetd program with Bering 1.2 (using uClibc 
 0.9.15) and I didn't have any problems. Now, I've downloaded the 
 Bering 2.0 image, and I've compiled again the utelnetd, in this case 
 with uClibc 0.9.20, but I couldn't make it work.
 
 When I telnet to the Bering Box, the client disconnects and in the 
 server I get the all network ports in use message. I checked the 
 pty/tty pairs in /dev and they seem to be OK ( I didn't modify the 
 Bering image that I downloaded from Leaf... only put a utelnetd.lrp 
 package).
 
 At least, I checked the utelnetd compiled in another linux box and 
 works fine (so I concluded that it's not a compilation problem).
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Mariano
 __
 
 Todava no tens tu Ciudad Internet Mail? Obtenelo ahora! - 
 http://webmail.ciudad.com.ar
 
 Descarg Gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 6.0, el mejor software para

 actualizar tu PC. http://www.ciudad.com.ar/ar/servicios/ie/
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
 With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single 
 machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual 
 machines at the same time. Free trial click here: 
 http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0


 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...

2003-07-21 Thread Matt Schalit


Michelle Konzack wrote:
...
and can not build new LRP 2.9.4 Packages... 

Michelle


Mich, if you have 2.9.4, that means ipfwadm.
Just log the packets with that.
I think all you need are these as your first
firewall rules.
FW=/sbin/ipfwadm

$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
If they are loaded first, they take precedence.
The -o is the logging option.
These 4 rules allow udp  tcp to flow inbound and
outbound from eth0.
So put these rules in place only long enough to capture
the packets and post them if you want.  I hope I got the
syntax correct, because I don't have a 2.9.4 image booted.
matt



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html