RE: [leaf-user] ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory
Hello. I'm runnig Bering 1.2 with 3 NIC's and wireless access on DMZ. Since I put third NIC I noticed message on boot: ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory Using /lib/modules/ip_conntrack_ftp.o And everything runs no problems. Anybody has any idea what causes this message? Just gessing from the error message, some script on the boot up does a find in /proc. The /proc/19764 directory is the one containing the info about the running process with pid 19764. The error message likely appears because the process 19764 ends during the find. It is very unlikely that the find needs to look in the process directories at all, that's why everything works fine. - Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Qmail questions
Michael D Schleif wrote: Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:26:21:47:40-0500] scribed: snip / using the host command, I can get the dmz host to resolve other names and reverse lookup other ips but not it's own. I altered the /etc/tinydns-private/root/data file to read: =localhost:127.0.0.1 localhost:127.0.0.1:a 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa:127.0.0.1:a kroffts.home:127.0.0.1:a 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa:127.0.0.1:a =markii.kroffts.home:192.168.1.254 =coventry.kroffts.home:192.168.1.1 =mail.kroffts.dmz:192.168.10.1 @kroffts.dmz:192.168.10.1:mail.kroffts.dmz @10.168.192.in-addr.arpa::mail.kroffts.dmz As Lynn points out, dnscache on your router may function best at 127.0.0.0, and tinydns at 192.168.1.254 _and_ 192.168.10.254. However, as you undoubtedly know, tinydns can bind to only one (1) interface. Therefore, you will need to run a _second_ instance of tinydns, one authoritative for 192.168.1/24 and the other authoritative for 192.168.10/24. I use tiny dns to resolve both my networks running from two interfaces on the router - but I had to label the dmz machine with the same network name as the local network. dnscache internal adresses are 192.168.1.254 and 192.168.2.254 tinydns internal address is 127.0.0.1 * * * maybe it is cheating but this sort of thing works for me in /etc/tinydns-private/root/data .kroffts.home::localhost .1.168.192.in-addr.arpa::localhost =markii.kroffts.home:192.168.1.254 =coventry.kroffts.home:192.168.1.1 etc .kroffts.dmz::localhost .10.168.192.in-addr.arpa::localhost =mail.kroffts.home:192.168.10.1 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Configuring IPsec for WLAN
Hi all, I have got another question on Bering 1.2 and IPsec. The problem with the LCDproc compilation was fixed. Now to IPSec. I have a Bering box acting as a accesspoint for the local net. Currently I use WEP 128 Bit encryption but would like to replace this with IPsec. I tried different things from the lists but nothing was working so far. I also read any documentation related to this I could found on the leaf websites. Does anybody do a similar setup ? Please help me to figure out, how to setup this beast. Tahnks. Oliver -- Einfach Leben ist nicht genug, sagte der Schmetterling. Man braucht Sonnenschein, Freiheit und kleine Blumen. (Anderson) +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory
Thanks. Do you have any idea what scripts I should look into? Andrey Alex Rhomberg wrote: Hello. I'm runnig Bering 1.2 with 3 NIC's and wireless access on DMZ. Since I put third NIC I noticed message on boot: ip_conntrack_ftp -find: /proc/19764 No such file or directory Using /lib/modules/ip_conntrack_ftp.o And everything runs no problems. Anybody has any idea what causes this message? Just gessing from the error message, some script on the boot up does a find in /proc. The /proc/19764 directory is the one containing the info about the running process with pid 19764. The error message likely appears because the process 19764 ends during the find. It is very unlikely that the find needs to look in the process directories at all, that's why everything works fine. - Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Setting time/date clarification
Hi folks, I'm trying to set up Bering-uClibc 2.0.1 to have the most accurate time/date functionality, and it seems from the docs that to do so is using the ntpdate.lrp package (which requires the libm.lrp package). 1.) Would using these packages be the most accurate timekeeping method for Bering? I have included both packages, placed an NTP server entry in the ntp-servers file, and placed the following entries in my Shorewall zones file per Bering documentation: ACCEPT fw net udp ntp (if you want to query an external NTP server) ACCEPT loc fw udp ntp (if you want to query your Bering box time server) When I issue the date command, Bering shows:Mon Dec 29 16:28:21 UTC 2003 2.) After reading the Bering documentation, I'm confused on how to adjust this for my time zone (I'm in Sacramento, California) 3.) Once adjusted, will Bering automatically adjust for Daylight Savings Time? Thank you, Craig --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Setting time/date clarification
Hi folks, (Please forgive me if this gets posted twice-the previous message seemed to bounce back to me for some reason) I'm trying to set up Bering-uClibc 2.0.1 to have the most accurate time/date functionality, and it seems from the docs that to do so is using the ntpdate.lrp package (which requires the libm.lrp package). 1.) Would using these packages be the most accurate timekeeping method for Bering? I have included both packages, placed an NTP server entry in the ntp-servers file, and placed the following entries in my Shorewall zones file per Bering documentation: ACCEPT fw net udp ntp (if you want to query an external NTP server) ACCEPT loc fw udp ntp (if you want to query your Bering box time server) When I issue the date command, Bering shows:Mon Dec 29 16:28:21 UTC 2003 2.) After reading the Bering documentation, I'm confused on how to adjust this for my time zone (I'm in Sacramento, California) 3.) Once adjusted, will Bering automatically adjust for Daylight Savings Time? Thank you, Craig --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] IPSec WiFi vs. weblet
Eureka! Determined to resolve this issue, I attempted to access the weblet over the VPN, and checked to see if any log file was touched. Just one. daemon.log. Which told me that I had failed to place a carriage return after the second entry in hosts.allow for my ipsec'd subnet. One carriage return later, all is well. Rejoice, etc. Thanks to one and all for their help. Perhaps Jacq^H^H^H^HEric can add this to the next round of documentation. Or are trailing carriare returns just *nix common sense? :Max --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] IPSec WiFi vs. weblet
At 06:20 PM 12/29/2003 +0100, Christopher Harewood wrote: Eureka! Determined to resolve this issue, I attempted to access the weblet over the VPN, and checked to see if any log file was touched. Just one. daemon.log. Which told me that I had failed to place a carriage return after the second entry in hosts.allow for my ipsec'd subnet. One carriage return later, all is well. Rejoice, etc. Thanks to one and all for their help. Perhaps Jacq^H^H^H^HEric can add this to the next round of documentation. Or are trailing carriare returns just *nix common sense? Not quite *nix comon sense, but a good bit more general than this specific file (/etc/hosts.allow). Some text files need a NEWLINE (0x0A or LineFeed, not a carriage return or 0x0D ... though properly configured Unix/Linux keyboard/text-processor combos do insert the correct character when the ENTER key is pressed, editing on a DOS/WIndows system and moving the file to a Unix/Linux system can introduce problems here) at the end of the last line of text. Some do not. As best as I can recall, adding one never hurts. Whether this means the docs for a specific package should mention it or not is unclear to me ... if it should, I suspect a lot of documentation needs this addition, not just this package. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Setting time/date clarification
Thank you, Erich I had looked at the link that you pointed me to (thank you, though.), and that's what I found confusing. I assume :-) that you need to complete both Steps 5.1 5.2. Right??? On that assumption, I don't know if it's correct, but I made an entry in the /etc/TZ that is: PST8PDT 1.) In Section 5.2, I see reference to the TZ variable. Does the variable already exist, or does it need to be created? Where do I create it? Thank you, Craig -Original Message- From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:03 AM To: Craig Caughlin Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Setting time/date clarification Craig At 08:35 29.12.2003 -0800, you wrote: Hi folks, I'm trying to set up Bering-uClibc 2.0.1 to have the most accurate time/date functionality, and it seems from the docs that to do so is using the ntpdate.lrp package (which requires the libm.lrp package). I suggest ntpdate to set the time and ntpsimpl to keep the time 1.) Would using these packages be the most accurate timekeeping method for Bering? Well a few well maintained cesium atomic clocks might do better ;-) see http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/clocks.html I have included both packages, placed an NTP server entry in the ntp-servers file, and placed the following entries in my Shorewall zones file per Bering documentation: ACCEPT fw net udp ntp (if you want to query an external NTP server) ACCEPT loc fw udp ntp (if you want to query your Bering box time server) When I issue the date command, Bering shows:Mon Dec 29 16:28:21 UTC 2003 2.) After reading the Bering documentation, I'm confused on how to adjust this for my time zone (I'm in Sacramento, California) Setting local time offset is done differently in Bering and Bering-uClibc see http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/buci-tz.html 3.) Once adjusted, will Bering automatically adjust for Daylight Savings Time? see above HTH Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ulogd mysql plugin
Hi all, Has anyone got a ulogd.lrp package with the mysql plugin? I've searched everywhere on the web, and not being to confident with linux I'm not sure how to compile ulogd as a package for bering. I'm running Bering 1.2 Linux talon 2.4.20 #1 Sun May 11 18:53:34 CEST 2003 i686 unknown any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers Adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] simple? firewall port question - dachstein-1.0.2
I know this is probably simple and trivial, but I can't get it to work for the life of me... I use Dachstein-1.0.2 as a firewall for my windows machines behind my t-1. The only thing they do is browse the internet and I ssh to my external servers, play some games at times.. normal stuff. There are no servers behind the firewall that need to be opened to the outside world. My problem is I got a ps/2, with Socom-II and a Mic/Headset, got the ps2 online behind the firewall with no problems (I use static IP's for all my machines). But I can't get the mic/headset to work online... it works in single player mode and online at my cousins house behind a linksys router, so I know the mic/headset is good. I've tried numerous times/diffirent options to opening up these ports for/to my ps/2 mic to work but with no luck. Reading up, I believe the ports I need to open are: tcp-10070 through 10080 and udp 6000-6999 and udp 10070. Can anyone help me out with a simple way to open these up for my ps/2... my config IP's: Dachstein system: 192.168.1.254 PS/2: 192.168.1.199 If you could reply to my email as well I'd appreciate it as Im in digest mode, thanks for any help! Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] simple? firewall port question - dachstein-1.0.2
At 12:34 PM 12/29/2003 -0800, Michael Rogers wrote: I know this is probably simple and trivial, but I can't get it to work for the life of me... I use Dachstein-1.0.2 as a firewall for my windows machines behind my t-1. The only thing they do is browse the internet and I ssh to my external servers, play some games at times.. normal stuff. There are no servers behind the firewall that need to be opened to the outside world. My problem is I got a ps/2, with Socom-II and a Mic/Headset, got the ps2 online behind the firewall with no problems (I use static IP's for all my machines). But I can't get the mic/headset to work online... it works in single player mode and online at my cousins house behind a linksys router, so I know the mic/headset is good. I've tried numerous times/diffirent options to opening up these ports for/to my ps/2 mic to work but with no luck. Reading up, I believe the ports I need to open are: tcp-10070 through 10080 and udp 6000-6999 and udp 10070. Can anyone help me out with a simple way to open these up for my ps/2... my config IP's: Dachstein system: 192.168.1.254 PS/2: 192.168.1.199 It would be easier to help if you provided the standard disgnostics for your system (see the SR FAQ). Without them, I'll offer a guess -- firewalls of the vintage of Dach often blocked access to remote ports around 6000, due to a well-known security hole involving remote X Window connections. My *guess* is that the version of Dach you are using -- or the drop-in firewall, if you are using EchoWall or Seawall -- includes that limitation, and that's what is biting you. If so, there is some entry in /etc/network.conf, or a related file -- or the config file for the drop-in firewall -- that puts a DENY rule for these ports into one of the chains (proably OUTPUT). Also, the phrase open up is meaningless in this context. Do you merely mean that the firewall has to ACCEPT traffic to and from these ports, or that it has to port-forward it to a specific IP address, or that it needs some sort of special helper module (like ftp does), or what? Did your cousin need to do anything special with the Linksys, for example ... that would give a good hint of what the Dach firewall needs to be told. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] ulogd mysql plugin
--- AdStar® [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Has anyone got a ulogd.lrp package with the mysql plugin? I've searched everywhere on the web, and not being to confident with linux I'm not sure how to compile ulogd as a package for bering. I gave it a try for both postgresql and mysql ten months ago. You can find details on the leaf-user list; search the list for lwd or visit http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg12948.html . You can also search ulogd mailing list for the same item or visit http://lists.gnumonks.org/pipermail/ulogd/2003-February/000241.html. Anyhow, the idea is to compile both ulogd and mysql packages with the libraries used by bering [glibc 2.0.7 if I guess right] after a minor change in ulogd source code [see the messages in archives]. If you need more help let me know, but unfortunately I'll be available after the 5-th of January 2004 :(. Good luck, lwd. __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
