RE: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[music-line]

Thanks to all for the useful replies.  I like Jenny's idea  of putting the
'long blurb' in the text tab of the Mastet Scource.

Best wishes

David

*
David S Brookes
Musical Director, The Brewood Singers
www.brewoodsingers.co.uk
Organist & Choirmaster, Polesworth Abbey
www.polesworthabbey.co.uk
*



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: 01 October 2008 01:32
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date'
in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.


My bad. I misread the question to being about avoiding multiple inputting of
data. 
Rich in LA CA


--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date'
in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 11:39 AM
> RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
> >Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4
> characters is made 
> >up for by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere
> in whichever report you 
> >use, without retyping. In the past, I used
> abbreviations to save disk 
> >space usage, I learned and changed my ways.
> 
> Richard, you made this reply to a post of mine, but I'm
> afraid I can't 
> see any relevance to what I said.
> 
> I never mentioned anything being redundant.  When you refer
> to "4 
> characters" I presume you mean the year.  The OP asked
> if he should use 
> "1951" as in the Census title or use
> "2005" from the Ancestry "blurb." 
> I replied that I would not use 1951 but would use 2005 and
> gave my 
> reasons, which had nothing to do with anything being
> redundant.
> 
> As far as I am aware, no one has made any reference in this
> thread to 
> saving disk space.  The question is about the
> "correct" or most-favoured 
> way to cite a particular source.
> -- 
> Jenny M Benson
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

My bad. I misread the question to being about avoiding multiple inputting of 
data. 
Rich in LA CA


--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in 
> the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 11:39 AM
> RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
> >Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4
> characters is made 
> >up for by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere
> in whichever report you 
> >use, without retyping. In the past, I used
> abbreviations to save disk 
> >space usage, I learned and changed my ways.
> 
> Richard, you made this reply to a post of mine, but I'm
> afraid I can't 
> see any relevance to what I said.
> 
> I never mentioned anything being redundant.  When you refer
> to "4 
> characters" I presume you mean the year.  The OP asked
> if he should use 
> "1951" as in the Census title or use
> "2005" from the Ancestry "blurb." 
> I replied that I would not use 1951 but would use 2005 and
> gave my 
> reasons, which had nothing to do with anything being
> redundant.
> 
> As far as I am aware, no one has made any reference in this
> thread to 
> saving disk space.  The question is about the
> "correct" or most-favoured 
> way to cite a particular source.
> -- 
> Jenny M Benson
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Mary Young]

Thanks Ron
Thanks for the instructions. It's easy when you know how:-)
Result (as you said) "The total number of individuals given in the
Surnames list excludes "Private","
I guess that makes sense in a way, and has nothing to do with AKAs or
married names etc.
Off to have the half and the kip!

Mary Young



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[ronald ferguson]

Mary,

You're not having a good day are you - so cheer up, have a half and a good kip 
:-).

Search>Find>Miscellaneous  at the top left.

Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_




> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:53:06 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Ron wrote
>
>> As above and then add a second search "AND" Individual; Tag No; Equal To; 
>> Tagged; where "Tag No" is the tag for your Focus Group.
>
> Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
> (Sorry about this ... brain not up to par today)
>
> Mary Young
>

_
Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354033/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Mary Young]

Ron wrote

>  As above and then add a second search "AND" Individual; Tag No; Equal To; 
> Tagged; where "Tag No" is the tag for your Focus Group.

Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
(Sorry about this ... brain not up to par today)

Mary Young



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[Jenny M Benson]

RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4 characters is made 
up for by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere in whichever report you 
use, without retyping. In the past, I used abbreviations to save disk 
space usage, I learned and changed my ways.


Richard, you made this reply to a post of mine, but I'm afraid I can't 
see any relevance to what I said.


I never mentioned anything being redundant.  When you refer to "4 
characters" I presume you mean the year.  The OP asked if he should use 
"1951" as in the Census title or use "2005" from the Ancestry "blurb." 
I replied that I would not use 1951 but would use 2005 and gave my 
reasons, which had nothing to do with anything being redundant.


As far as I am aware, no one has made any reference in this thread to 
saving disk space.  The question is about the "correct" or most-favoured 
way to cite a particular source.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

Redundancy is not evil. The disk space used by the 4 characters is made up for 
by the 'fact' it is appearing somewhere in whichever report you use, without 
retyping. In the past, I used abbreviations to save disk space usage, I learned 
and changed my ways. 
Rich in LA CA


--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in 
> the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 5:05 AM
> music-line wrote
> >Just interested to see what people do here.  What
> information would 
> >people put in the 'published date' section of
> the sourcewriter template 
> >if the information is found online at ancestry.com?
> >1851?  It is the 1851 census of England, so is there
> any point in 
> >putting it twice?
> 
> No!
> >
> >2005?
> 
> Well, that's what I put.
> >
> >Or would folk copy the whole sentence?
> >
> >"1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo,
> UT, USA: The 
> >Generations Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census
> Returns of 
> >England and Wales, 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The
> National Archives of 
> >the UK (TNA): Public Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data
> imaged from the 
> >National Archives, London, England."
> 
> It has been dropped from the SourceWriter tab, but on the
> Text tab of 
> the Basic Style Master source was the helpful suggestion
> "(copy of 
> description contained within the source)" and that is
> exactly what I put 
> on the Text tab of Master Sources.  So for the 1851 Census
> I enter that 
> sentence you have quoted above.
> 
> Sometimes it is useful even to me to have this explanatory
> text for a 
> rather obscure website; in the case of Ancestry probably
> nearly everyone 
> knows what it is, but for the benefit of those who
> don't there is the 
> option to include this text the first time the Master
> Source is cited in 
> a Report.
> -- 
> Jenny M Benson
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[RICHARD SCHULTHIES]

You are not mentioning the unknowns that maybe created for the webpage that the 
program doesn't need to be filled for screen stuff. I am only guessing.
Rich in LA CA


--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jack Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Jack Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 4:23 AM
> I also get a similar discrepancy, but I believe that you can
> account for
> this totally with the number of AKA's and married
> surnames
> 
> As others have said, the actual number of pages created is
> correct
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mary Young
> Sent: 30 September 2008 08:27
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
> 
> After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy
> tells me
> it's handled  "774 Individuals"
> But the Surname Page in the set says "This site
> contains 650 Individuals
> ..."
> Why the discrepancy in numbers?
> Regards
> Mary Young
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Using Sourcewriter templates - Footnote/Endnote Citation etc

[Richard Van Wasshnova]

Say What?

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Herson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Aother idiotic programming scrweup in Legacy.
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Help with event wording

[Sandra Vaneldik]

Hi, How about 'relocation'?

Sandra V




Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Compare Two Files for Differences

[Mike Fry]

Dave Johnson wrote:

I need some counsel from learned Legacy users.  My brother and I are 
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7.  Each of us 
makes entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new 
information.  Each of us has about 6,600 individuals in our files.  We 
know that most of the information is the same.  The question is:  How 
can we keep our files in synch? 

Legacy has a method to “compare two files for duplicates” capability.  
Is there a way to compare two files for SAMENESS and highlight the 
differences?


How do others keep their files in synch with other family members?


Look in the on-line help for 'IntelliShare'

--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg.



Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Compare Two Files for Differences

[ronald ferguson]

Dave,

This would, I think, rather depend on what your reason is, or exactly what you 
mean by keeping them in sinc. My brother in law work and I together but he 
works on his family tree and I work on mine bringing them together only for our 
website. In actual fact they are never together as one Legacy file, but there 
is no reason why they shouldn't be, all I would have to do is delete the common 
individuals from his file and link it to mine. In this situation I see no need 
for a common "sameness". I know of no program which can compare two Access 
files in this way.

However, from what you say it would seem that you wish to have two identical 
files. I would suggest that the first thing you would need to do would be to 
create an agreed common file. This could be stored on any one of the sites 
which offer back-up storage and then updated by each of you as required.

One possibility for comparison which you may like to consider is to create 
Pedigree webpages for all the contents of both your files and then use CSdiff 
or Winmerge to compare the two html files. This will not show differences in 
wording but should show differences in facts.


Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Compare Two Files for Differences
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:35:00 -0700










I need some counsel from learned Legacy users.  My brother and I are 
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7.  Each of us makes 
entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new information.  Each of 
us has about 6,600 individuals in our files.  We know that most of the 
information is the same.  The question is:  How can we keep our files in synch?





Legacy has a method to “compare two files for duplicates” capability.  Is there 
a way to compare two files for SAMENESS and highlight the differences?





How do others keep their files in synch with other family members?





I appreciate your counsel.





Dave




_
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Compare Two Files for Differences

[Kathy Shiell-Stokes]

Dave:
Use the intellimerge feature...after you have decided which of you 
will be the"keeper of the file.If were to be you, you would need to 
keep a "master" file that you merged your changes to prior to 
emailing it to your brother for him to work on. Periodically, he 
would email the file back to you so that you could intellimerge it 
into the original file.Naturally, your brother would need to 
intellimerge the files he receives from you with his own file so that 
what you receive from him contains his changes. As "keeper of the 
file" I would keep two copies of the database...one as a master and 
one as a working file. Make any changes to the working file and then 
periodically(ie prior to emailing it out to your 
brother...intellimerge the working file into your master copy..only 
the changed records will be merged.How often this happens can depend 
on how quickly the information gets out of synch but likely once a 
month would be goodjust prior to doing your monthly backup. At 
10:35 AM 9/30/2008, you wrote:


I need some counsel from learned Legacy users.  My brother and I are 
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7.  Each of 
us makes entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new 
information.  Each of us has about 6,600 individuals in our 
files.  We know that most of the information is the same.  The 
question is:  How can we keep our files in synch?


Legacy has a method to "compare two files for duplicates" 
capability.  Is there a way to compare two files for SAMENESS and 
highlight the differences?


How do others keep their files in synch with other family members?

I appreciate your counsel.

Dave



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.136 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1698 - Release Date: 
9/29/2008 7:25 PM

Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Compare Two Files for Differences

[Dave Johnson]

 

I need some counsel from learned Legacy users.  My brother and I are
maintaining our family genealogical files using Legacy 7.  Each of us makes
entries into our individual Legacy file as we obtain new information.  Each
of us has about 6,600 individuals in our files.  We know that most of the
information is the same.  The question is:  How can we keep our files in
synch?  

 

Legacy has a method to "compare two files for duplicates" capability.  Is
there a way to compare two files for SAMENESS and highlight the differences?


 

How do others keep their files in synch with other family members?

 

I appreciate your counsel.

 

Dave

 

 






Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[Geoff Rasmussen]

David,

The published date field for an online source is reserved for the year when
the document/database was initially published if you can locate that
information. For Ancestry.com databases, it is always available in their
citation.

Thanks,

Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of music-line
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:58 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in
the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

Hi everyone,

Just interested to see what people do here.  What information would people
put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template if the
information is found online at ancestry.com?

1851?  It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in putting it
twice?

2005?

Or would folk copy the whole sentence?

"1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations
Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales,
1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA): Public
Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National Archives, London,
England."

Best wishes

David




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[John Clare]

The original source is National Archives HO107 (HO stands for Home Office)
and the class is England and Wales Census for 1851 (not just England). There
are many organisations who have transcribed the images, but the original
image production was done by the National Archives in the days when it was
the PRO or Public Record Office. The National Archives is at Kew (which is
now a suburb of London) so I use "Census of England and Wales 1851, National
Archive, Kew, Richmond, Surrey (Class HO107)" and then the publisher, which
in my case is TheGenealogist.com

John

2008/9/30 Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> music-line wrote
>
>> Just interested to see what people do here.  What information would people
>> put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template if the
>> information is found online at ancestry.com?
>> 1851?  It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in putting
>> it twice?
>>
>
> No!
>
>>
>> 2005?
>>
>
> Well, that's what I put.
>
>>
>> Or would folk copy the whole sentence?
>>
>> "1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations
>> Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales,
>> 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA): Public
>> Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National Archives, London,
>> England."
>>
>
> It has been dropped from the SourceWriter tab, but on the Text tab of the
> Basic Style Master source was the helpful suggestion "(copy of description
> contained within the source)" and that is exactly what I put on the Text tab
> of Master Sources.  So for the 1851 Census I enter that sentence you have
> quoted above.
>
> Sometimes it is useful even to me to have this explanatory text for a
> rather obscure website; in the case of Ancestry probably nearly everyone
> knows what it is, but for the benefit of those who don't there is the option
> to include this text the first time the Master Source is cited in a Report.
> --
> Jenny M Benson
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[Jenny M Benson]

ronald ferguson wrote

There is no way I would put in all that stuff from Ancestry!!


As you will see elsewhere in this thread, I do!  (For the reasons I have 
given.)


Ancestry is the repository and not the source.


I agree with you, but Ancestry is "publishing" the Census and "handy 
hint" for that field reads "Type the date posted, updated or 
copyrighted" so it seems to make sense to put that 2005 date in there. 
Well, it does to me, anyway!  Although I don't always bother to fill 
that field (or the equivalent) in Master Sources and I think it probably 
doesn't matter terribly much, in most (all?) cases if one chooses to 
ignore it.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[Jenny M Benson]

music-line wrote
Just interested to see what people do here.  What information would 
people put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template 
if the information is found online at ancestry.com?
1851?  It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in 
putting it twice?


No!


2005?


Well, that's what I put.


Or would folk copy the whole sentence?

"1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The 
Generations Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census Returns of 
England and Wales, 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of 
the UK (TNA): Public Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the 
National Archives, London, England."


It has been dropped from the SourceWriter tab, but on the Text tab of 
the Basic Style Master source was the helpful suggestion "(copy of 
description contained within the source)" and that is exactly what I put 
on the Text tab of Master Sources.  So for the 1851 Census I enter that 
sentence you have quoted above.


Sometimes it is useful even to me to have this explanatory text for a 
rather obscure website; in the case of Ancestry probably nearly everyone 
knows what it is, but for the benefit of those who don't there is the 
option to include this text the first time the Master Source is cited in 
a Report.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Gene Young]

Mary Young wrote:

After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled  "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young




If you stop and think about it, the program must "handle" an individual before it can determine 
whether that individual is to be included under the parameters you specified.  If it determines that 
the individual does not meet the criteria you specified, it does not create a web page for that 
individual, BUT it still "handled" him/her.



--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer & Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.ripway.com/egptech/



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Jack Earnshaw]

I also get a similar discrepancy, but I believe that you can account for
this totally with the number of AKA's and married surnames

As others have said, the actual number of pages created is correct

Jack


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Young
Sent: 30 September 2008 08:27
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled  "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals
..."
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Help with event wording

[Dermot McGlone]

Melanie,

I may be missing the point, but you could still use the residence
event, but where it asks for date put in something like "From 1877 to
1878" (without the quotes). would that work for you?

Dermot.

Eleanor Roosevelt  - "Women are like teabags. We don't know our true
strength until we are in hot water!"

2008/9/29 Melanie Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to create an event for when people move from one place to another, 
> not just list their residence at a given date.  As I have it now, I am using 
> the word 'moved' as an event name.  The word moved just doesn't see quite 
> right--it doesn't flow very well.  I guess I could use removed or removal, 
> but I had never heard that word until I started doing genealogy.  So far, the 
> event reads as follows:
>
> Moved: John moved from India to Scotland when he was 11 years old in 1877 or 
> 1878.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Melanie Tucker
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[ronald ferguson]

David,

There is no way I would put in all that stuff from Ancestry!!

I have actually put in "1851" - I must been rather keen that day as I have put 
the actual date of the census in the recorded date. The "1851" to which you 
refer actually only appears in the Bibliography and I agree it is a bit of a 
waste of time - so no problem in leaving it out.

Ancestry is the repository and not the source.


Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_




> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the 
> the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:57:37 +0100
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just interested to see what people do here. What information would people
> put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template if the
> information is found online at ancestry.com?
>
> 1851? It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in putting it
> twice?
>
> 2005?
>
> Or would folk copy the whole sentence?
>
> "1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations
> Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales,
> 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA): Public
> Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National Archives, London,
> England."
>
> Best wishes
>
> David
>
> *
> David S Brookes
> Musical Director, The Brewood Singers
> www.brewoodsingers.co.uk
> Organist & Choirmaster, Polesworth Abbey
> www.polesworthabbey.co.uk
> *
>
>

_
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Census Information: How to record 'published date' in the the Master Source definition of Sourcewriter.

[music-line]

Hi everyone,

Just interested to see what people do here.  What information would people
put in the 'published date' section of the sourcewriter template if the
information is found online at ancestry.com?

1851?  It is the 1851 census of England, so is there any point in putting it
twice?

2005?

Or would folk copy the whole sentence?

"1851 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations
Network, Inc., 2005. Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales,
1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA): Public
Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National Archives, London,
England."

Best wishes

David

*
David S Brookes
Musical Director, The Brewood Singers
www.brewoodsingers.co.uk
Organist & Choirmaster, Polesworth Abbey
www.polesworthabbey.co.uk
*





Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[ronald ferguson]

Mary,

As above and then add a second search "AND" Individual; Tag No; Equal To; 
Tagged; where "Tag No" is the tag for your Focus Group.

Ron Ferguson


Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_




> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:22:23 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Ron and Evert
> Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
> I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
> Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure it out :-)
>
> Mary
>

_
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Mary Young]

Ron  and Evert
Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
I  need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure it out :-)

Mary



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[ronald ferguson]

Mary,

Are you having a bad hair day ? :-)

Search>Find>Detailed Search

Individual; Private; Equals; Private.

I am not certain as to whether, in V6, the total number of persons found is 
given in the list of people found (it's in the description bar in V7).

The total number of individuals given in the Surnames list excludes "Private", 
and of course, the total number of individuals in your .fdb file is in Gen. 
Info.

Have a good day!


Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_




> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:23:40 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
> 6. so I don't have the new "include invisible".
> I do have a lot of "Private" Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
> How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
> for Private Individuals.
> Regards
> Mary
>
>

_
Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354033/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Evert van Dijken]

Goto Search > Find > Detailed Search Tab and select:
Look for whom - Individual
Where to look - Private
How to look - Equal To
What to look for - Private
Evert

2008/9/30 Mary Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
> 6. so I don't have the new "include invisible".
> I do have a lot of "Private" Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
> How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
> for Private Individuals.
> Regards
> Mary
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Mary Young]

Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
6. so I don't have the new "include invisible".
I do have a lot of "Private" Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
for Private Individuals.
Regards
Mary



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[ronald ferguson]

I am just updating my site and did not notice this difference. However, I have 
checked the total number of pages produced against the total numbers of records 
in my .fdb file and these are in agreement.

It would seem, therefore, that although the figures may be wrong during the 
creation of the pages, the correct number of pages are created.


Ron Ferguson

_

*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_




> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:04:10 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I tested this with the sample file and without tagging "include
> invisible ..." I got 145 individuals (from 158) and after tagging this
> option I had 158 individuals in the Surname index. The strange thing
> is that there are no invisible individuals in the sample file (there
> are 13 private individuals in the file and that is exactly the
> difference between 158 and 145).
> I couldn't find this in the Bugtracking system but could see that the
> programmers are working on a Privacy Tab for Web pages.
> I didn't have "Suppress details for living people" on the Other tab
> tagged. It seems that untagging the "include invisible..." has an
> effect on the "suppress details for living people".
> I'll send this in CC to bugs, but I suppose this will be fixed when
> they are working on the Privacy Tab for Web pages.
> Evert
>
> 2008/9/30 Mary Young :
>> After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
>> it's handled "774 Individuals"
>> But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
>> Why the discrepancy in numbers?
>> Regards
>> Mary Young
>>

_
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Evert van Dijken]

I tested this with the sample file and without tagging "include
invisible ..." I got 145 individuals (from 158) and after tagging this
option I had 158 individuals in the Surname index. The strange thing
is that there are no invisible individuals in the sample file (there
are 13 private individuals in the file and that is exactly the
difference between 158 and 145).
I couldn't find this in the Bugtracking system but could see that the
programmers are working on a Privacy Tab for Web pages.
I didn't have "Suppress details for living people" on the Other tab
tagged. It seems that untagging the "include invisible..." has an
effect on the "suppress details for living people".
I'll send this in CC to bugs, but I suppose this will be fixed when
they are working on the Privacy Tab for Web pages.
Evert

2008/9/30 Mary Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
> it's handled  "774 Individuals"
> But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
> Why the discrepancy in numbers?
> Regards
> Mary Young
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals

[Mary Young]

After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled  "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp