Re: OT - Windows 10 - Fixing The Lag In Changing Virtual Desktops

2024-08-11 Thread Jacob Peck
Huh, interesting behavior you're seeing there.  I just played around with
the virtual desktops feature, then force-killed explorer (the 'root'
process), and then used File->New Task, typed 'explorer' in the box, and
hit enter.  It all came back no issue, other than closing the couple of
file explorer windows I had open.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but 'force kill explorer -> start a new
explorer task' has been my go-to Windows fix for most things for the last
20 years or so, and has worked without a hitch in every case for me (except
for a handful of times on Vista, but uh, Vista...). :)

Perhaps I've just been lucky?  Maybe the other 'explorer.exe' processes
running in your case were masking the issue -- IIRC, explorer does the
'root' check on startup -- if no other instances of explorer.exe are
running, it assumes complete control.  I can't remember the exact blog post
I read about this, but I think it was from Raymond Chen, who's been on the
Windows internals team forever.

But hey, you've got a fix that works for you, so at this point I'm just
nerd sniping myself.  Thanks for the puzzle and the tip! :)

Jake

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 9:16 PM Thomas Passin  wrote:

> Even if you can open a new instance of Windows Explorer, you have to open
> it in a special way for it to take over the desktop function.  Otherwise it
> will just show you the usual list of files.  The one time I managed to kill
> the root instance, I couldn't find a key combination that did anything.  I
> forget how I eventually shut down; it was too long ago.  I might have just
> held the power button down long enough.
>
> I think this virtual desktops feature is one of Win 10's better ones.  In
> addition to -, you can move between adjacent desktops
> with  -  - , and this doesn't
> suffer from a lag.  Before this will work, you need to create another
> virtual desktop, which you can do with the  -  combo. On
> the display you will see a "+" sign labeled by "New Desktop".  That's how
> you create new ones.  I don't know if once created they can be removed.
>
> On Sunday, August 11, 2024 at 7:50:36 PM UTC-4 gates...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Interesting find.
>>
>> IIRC the Ctrl+Alt+Del menu is part of the Kernel, and interrupts
>> everything else happening on a Windows box.  If you manage to completely
>> nuke Explorer, you should pretty much always be able to three-finger-salute
>> into a Task Manager and go File->New Task and fire off a new ‘explorer.exe’
>> to un-bork yourself.  If the Task Manager is not working, then something is
>> seriously wrong :)
>>
>> I break Windows quite often, but I don’t use virtual desktops.  I
>> honestly didn’t even know Windows 10 had that feature :)
>>
>> Jake
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2024, at 5:32 PM, Thomas Passin  wrote:
>>
>> This isn't about Leo but I can't be the only one affected by this
>> problem, which can be very annoying.
>>
>>
>> I use many virtual desktops in my daily computing.  Usually I have at
>> least four, and sometimes up to six.  For example, my browser and email
>> client are in one.  Leo and associated folders, command windows, etc., are
>> in another, and so on.
>>
>> The problem is in switching from one to another.  -
>> brings up a special view of all the desktops where you can choose one.  In
>> this view you can also move an application from one desktop to another.
>> Over time, switching to this overview gets slower and slower until it
>> becomes intolerable.  I've searched the internet without success.  The only
>> cure I knew before today was to log off and log back in.
>>
>> Here's what turns out to be happening. The desktop on your screen, the
>> thing that has a background and the file icons, is a special view created
>> by one particular root instance of Windows Explorer. It starts to use more
>> and more memory over time for reasons unknown to me.  When its "Working
>> Set" of memory gets too large,  that's when opening the desktop overview
>> gets slow.
>>
>> You can see this and take care of the problem with the Task Manager
>> program.  Look in the "Processes" tab and find all the instances of Windows
>> Explorer, normally near the bottom in a display sorted alphabetically. How
>> will you know the right instance?  Most of the Window Explorer instances
>> will show 3 or 4 MB of memory, while one will show over 100 MB.  That's the
>> one.  I've seen it get up nearly to 300 MB. That's when you get the big
>> lags.  Mine is now 145 MB and there isn't a lag in showing the desktop
>> overview. But mine has been slowly climbing all afternoon.
>>
>> Don't kill this process or you won't be able to communicate with the
>> computer (I learned that the hard way). There is a button in the lower
>> right of the Task Manager that usually reads "End Task". You will notice
>> that when you select a Windows Explorer task that label changes to
>> "Restart".  That's what you want to do. Click on it.
>>
>> The desktop behind your application windows will go blank for a second or
>> so, then 

Re: OT - Windows 10 - Fixing The Lag In Changing Virtual Desktops

2024-08-11 Thread Thomas Passin
Even if you can open a new instance of Windows Explorer, you have to open 
it in a special way for it to take over the desktop function.  Otherwise it 
will just show you the usual list of files.  The one time I managed to kill 
the root instance, I couldn't find a key combination that did anything.  I 
forget how I eventually shut down; it was too long ago.  I might have just 
held the power button down long enough.

I think this virtual desktops feature is one of Win 10's better ones.  In 
addition to -, you can move between adjacent desktops 
with  -  - , and this doesn't 
suffer from a lag.  Before this will work, you need to create another 
virtual desktop, which you can do with the  -  combo. On 
the display you will see a "+" sign labeled by "New Desktop".  That's how 
you create new ones.  I don't know if once created they can be removed.

On Sunday, August 11, 2024 at 7:50:36 PM UTC-4 gates...@gmail.com wrote:

> Interesting find.
>
> IIRC the Ctrl+Alt+Del menu is part of the Kernel, and interrupts 
> everything else happening on a Windows box.  If you manage to completely 
> nuke Explorer, you should pretty much always be able to three-finger-salute 
> into a Task Manager and go File->New Task and fire off a new ‘explorer.exe’ 
> to un-bork yourself.  If the Task Manager is not working, then something is 
> seriously wrong :)
>
> I break Windows quite often, but I don’t use virtual desktops.  I honestly 
> didn’t even know Windows 10 had that feature :)
>
> Jake
>
> On Aug 11, 2024, at 5:32 PM, Thomas Passin  wrote:
>
> This isn't about Leo but I can't be the only one affected by this 
> problem, which can be very annoying.
>
>
> I use many virtual desktops in my daily computing.  Usually I have at 
> least four, and sometimes up to six.  For example, my browser and email 
> client are in one.  Leo and associated folders, command windows, etc., are 
> in another, and so on.
>
> The problem is in switching from one to another.  - 
> brings up a special view of all the desktops where you can choose one.  In 
> this view you can also move an application from one desktop to another.  
> Over time, switching to this overview gets slower and slower until it 
> becomes intolerable.  I've searched the internet without success.  The only 
> cure I knew before today was to log off and log back in.
>
> Here's what turns out to be happening. The desktop on your screen, the 
> thing that has a background and the file icons, is a special view created 
> by one particular root instance of Windows Explorer. It starts to use more 
> and more memory over time for reasons unknown to me.  When its "Working 
> Set" of memory gets too large,  that's when opening the desktop overview 
> gets slow.
>
> You can see this and take care of the problem with the Task Manager 
> program.  Look in the "Processes" tab and find all the instances of Windows 
> Explorer, normally near the bottom in a display sorted alphabetically. How 
> will you know the right instance?  Most of the Window Explorer instances 
> will show 3 or 4 MB of memory, while one will show over 100 MB.  That's the 
> one.  I've seen it get up nearly to 300 MB. That's when you get the big 
> lags.  Mine is now 145 MB and there isn't a lag in showing the desktop 
> overview. But mine has been slowly climbing all afternoon.
>
> Don't kill this process or you won't be able to communicate with the 
> computer (I learned that the hard way). There is a button in the lower 
> right of the Task Manager that usually reads "End Task". You will notice 
> that when you select a Windows Explorer task that label changes to 
> "Restart".  That's what you want to do. Click on it.
>
> The desktop behind your application windows will go blank for a second or 
> so, then  rebuild itself.  And your virtual desktop overview will be 
> responsive again.
>
> I don't know if Windows 11 has the same problem since I've never been 
> around a Windows 11 computer.
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to leo-editor+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/161c017e-a230-4a4b-b374-b8f463bba525n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/edb143e5-4b41-416b-8080-f83ee009943dn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT - Windows 10 - Fixing The Lag In Changing Virtual Desktops

2024-08-11 Thread Jacob Peck
Interesting find.IIRC the Ctrl+Alt+Del menu is part of the Kernel, and interrupts everything else happening on a Windows box.  If you manage to completely nuke Explorer, you should pretty much always be able to three-finger-salute into a Task Manager and go File->New Task and fire off a new ‘explorer.exe’ to un-bork yourself.  If the Task Manager is not working, then something is seriously wrong :)I break Windows quite often, but I don’t use virtual desktops.  I honestly didn’t even know Windows 10 had that feature :)JakeOn Aug 11, 2024, at 5:32 PM, Thomas Passin  wrote:This isn't about Leo but I can't be the only one affected by this problem, which can be very annoying.I use many virtual desktops in my daily computing.  Usually I have at least four, and sometimes up to six.  For example, my browser and email client are in one.  Leo and associated folders, command windows, etc., are in another, and so on.The problem is in switching from one to another.  - brings up a special view of all the desktops where you can choose one.  In this view you can also move an application from one desktop to another.  Over time, switching to this overview gets slower and slower until it becomes intolerable.  I've searched the internet without success.  The only cure I knew before today was to log off and log back in.Here's what turns out to be happening. The desktop on your screen, the thing that has a background and the file icons, is a special view created by one particular root instance of Windows Explorer. It starts to use more and more memory over time for reasons unknown to me.  When its "Working Set" of memory gets too large,  that's when opening the desktop overview gets slow.You can see this and take care of the problem with the Task Manager program.  Look in the "Processes" tab and find all the instances of Windows Explorer, normally near the bottom in a display sorted alphabetically. How will you know the right instance?  Most of the Window Explorer instances will show 3 or 4 MB of memory, while one will show over 100 MB.  That's the one.  I've seen it get up nearly to 300 MB. That's when you get the big lags.  Mine is now 145 MB and there isn't a lag in showing the desktop overview. But mine has been slowly climbing all afternoon.Don't kill this process or you won't be able to communicate with the computer (I learned that the hard way). There is a button in the lower right of the Task Manager that usually reads "End Task". You will notice that when you select a Windows Explorer task that label changes to "Restart".  That's what you want to do. Click on it.The desktop behind your application windows will go blank for a second or so, then  rebuild itself.  And your virtual desktop overview will be responsive again.I don't know if Windows 11 has the same problem since I've never been around a Windows 11 computer.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/161c017e-a230-4a4b-b374-b8f463bba525n%40googlegroups.com.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/39EAA452-1043-41BF-A778-C17153DF57ED%40gmail.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-04-03 Thread Thomas Passin
Here is a report of trying to use ChatGPT to write programs (in R) by 
someone who who writes a lot of serious R programs -

Learning to Code with R using ChatGPT 


tl;dr - ChatGPT by and large did a pretty good job, but it's hard to 
predict when it's going to fail.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 12:09:02 PM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:

> Here's a really good book covering the basics of neural nets, fuzzy logic, 
> and the relationship between them.  It's rather old so it predates GPT and 
> modern systems with huge numbers of parameters, but it's really good (but 
> it has some math, because you can't escape that in this field).  It's not 
> about programming at all.
>
> Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine 
> Intelligence
> Bart Kosko
>
> I wish I knew where my own copy of it is.  I think it may be buried in a 
> box in a storage locker.
>
> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> I'm a little ambivalent.  I'd certainly like to play around with the 
> stuff, and apparently the code in this post is set up to use actual GPT 
> trained coefficients.  But what I'm most interested just now is training 
> with other specialized data sets, except that the ones I want don't exist, 
> or I don't know how to get them.  Besides, training on the scale of these 
> GPTs takes huge machines and mucho bucks.  
>
> I'll think on it and let you know, if that's all right.
>
> On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:58:44 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 5:28:00 PM UTC-5 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines 
> 
>
>
> This article looks exactly what I have been looking for.
>
> Would anyone like to join me in a study group based on this article?
>
> Edward
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/adc76ee0-847a-4775-8267-f5c1c0f6cf5fn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-03-30 Thread Thomas Passin
Here's a really good book covering the basics of neural nets, fuzzy logic, 
and the relationship between them.  It's rather old so it predates GPT and 
modern systems with huge numbers of parameters, but it's really good (but 
it has some math, because you can't escape that in this field).  It's not 
about programming at all.

Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine 
Intelligence
Bart Kosko

I wish I knew where my own copy of it is.  I think it may be buried in a 
box in a storage locker.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:

I'm a little ambivalent.  I'd certainly like to play around with the stuff, 
and apparently the code in this post is set up to use actual GPT trained 
coefficients.  But what I'm most interested just now is training with other 
specialized data sets, except that the ones I want don't exist, or I don't 
know how to get them.  Besides, training on the scale of these GPTs takes 
huge machines and mucho bucks.  

I'll think on it and let you know, if that's all right.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:58:44 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:

On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 5:28:00 PM UTC-5 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:

GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines 



This article looks exactly what I have been looking for.

Would anyone like to join me in a study group based on this article?

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/4817274b-b025-48e9-b49c-594a73a623dcn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-03-30 Thread Thomas Passin
I'm a little ambivalent.  I'd certainly like to play around with the stuff, 
and apparently the code in this post is set up to use actual GPT trained 
coefficients.  But what I'm most interested just now is training with other 
specialized data sets, except that the ones I want don't exist, or I don't 
know how to get them.  Besides, training on the scale of these GPTs takes 
huge machines and mucho bucks.  

I'll think on it and let you know, if that's all right.

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:58:44 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 5:28:00 PM UTC-5 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines 
> 
>
>
> This article looks exactly what I have been looking for.
>
> Would anyone like to join me in a study group based on this article?
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/229d1a82-4a0d-49e2-936d-f43931080978n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-03-30 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 5:28:00 PM UTC-5 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:

GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines 



This article looks exactly what I have been looking for.

Would anyone like to join me in a study group based on this article?

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/284fded8-6967-40a7-aa82-495266a3ed4bn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-03-30 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:28 PM Thomas Passin  wrote:

> GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines
> 


Yikes. Thanks for the link.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS28xJBWTCyfwifUZzZdv-Op9mhse%3Dxw7pEE5ATDQFVekg%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-03-29 Thread Thomas Passin
GPT in 60 lines of Python - GPT in 60 lines 


On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 10:17:26 AM UTC-5 Thomas Passin wrote:

> Here is an interesting link that among other things shows how ChatGPT has 
> major weaknesses in math, because it doesn't actually "understand" the 
> concepts.  In a way, this piece is a kind of extended infomercial for 
> Wolfram Alpha, but it's well worth worth reading anyway.
>
> On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:25:38 PM UTC-5 Thomas Passin wrote:
>
>> Humans probably have a level of abstraction that is most susceptible to 
>> manipulation.  It would perhaps differ between people to an extent, and 
>> also perhaps with the kind of subject  being manipulated.  I suspect that 
>> it is at a level that would correspond to "species" or the next higher 
>> level.   For example, not "this oak tree in my yard"  but "oak tree", or 
>> even "tree".  "immigrants", not "Juan Rodrigo".  Adding perjorative 
>> stereotyped adjectives probably changes the abstraction level and tends to 
>> hook into emotional (non-rational) stereotype processing, adding power to 
>> the manipulation.
>>
>> ChatGPT-like agents would be able to assemble such language if asked with 
>> the right prompts.
>>
>> On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:11:49 PM UTC-5 David Szent-Györgyi 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>
>>> Imo, we have every right to consider the need to address manipulation 
>>> by machines employing AI.  Period :-)
>>>
>>> Yes, but I am academically-minded, and I expect to argue my case - 
>>> because I do not expect to be believed unless I present a sound argument. 
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/56abc1db-0e6f-4b62-96da-9ffd7a21f3bfn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT: Breakthrough: "Liquid" neural networks

2023-03-11 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 8:19 AM Thomas Passin  wrote:

> Interesting!  And also hot off the presses, the complete neural structure
> of the brain of the fruit fly larva has been mapped.  It has  93 neuron
> types, 3016 neurons, with, get this, *548,000* interconnections.  The
> "liquid neural network" described in the Quanta article has 19 neurons and
> 253 connections.
>

Yes. Early days. No telling where this will all lead...

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS2zXbL2hSbtPGji-ZxPGW_M4QEaehsLdCsNwBDVZLyjpQ%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT: Breakthrough: "Liquid" neural networks

2023-03-11 Thread Thomas Passin
Interesting!  And also hot off the presses, the complete neural structure 
of the brain of the fruit fly larva has been mapped.  It has  93 neuron 
types, 3016 neurons, with, get this, *548,000* interconnections.  The 
"liquid neural network" described in the Quanta article has 19 neurons and 
253 connections.
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 5:08:47 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> From this article 
> 
>  
> in Quanta magazine.
>
> Attached is the cited paper. The maths are beyond me, but the summary is 
> clear enough:
>
> "...we obtain models that are between one and five orders of magnitude 
> faster in training and inference compared with differential equation-based 
> counterparts. More importantly, ...closed-form networks can scale 
> remarkably well compared with other deep learning instances. Lastly, as 
> these models are derived from liquid networks, they show good performance 
> in time-series modelling compared with advanced recurrent neural network 
> models."
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/3fac8a2d-0b44-43ed-b282-21ed97669b33n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-31 Thread Thomas Passin
Here is an interesting link that among other things shows how ChatGPT has 
major weaknesses in math, because it doesn't actually "understand" the 
concepts.  In a way, this piece is a kind of extended infomercial for 
Wolfram Alpha, but it's well worth worth reading anyway.

On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:25:38 PM UTC-5 Thomas Passin wrote:

> Humans probably have a level of abstraction that is most susceptible to 
> manipulation.  It would perhaps differ between people to an extent, and 
> also perhaps with the kind of subject  being manipulated.  I suspect that 
> it is at a level that would correspond to "species" or the next higher 
> level.   For example, not "this oak tree in my yard"  but "oak tree", or 
> even "tree".  "immigrants", not "Juan Rodrigo".  Adding perjorative 
> stereotyped adjectives probably changes the abstraction level and tends to 
> hook into emotional (non-rational) stereotype processing, adding power to 
> the manipulation.
>
> ChatGPT-like agents would be able to assemble such language if asked with 
> the right prompts.
>
> On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:11:49 PM UTC-5 David Szent-Györgyi wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> Imo, we have every right to consider the need to address manipulation by 
>> machines employing AI.  Period :-)
>>
>> Yes, but I am academically-minded, and I expect to argue my case - 
>> because I do not expect to be believed unless I present a sound argument. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/d0a4c1a6-e457-48b5-9e39-84b5111bf0c8n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-29 Thread Thomas Passin
Humans probably have a level of abstraction that is most susceptible to 
manipulation.  It would perhaps differ between people to an extent, and 
also perhaps with the kind of subject  being manipulated.  I suspect that 
it is at a level that would correspond to "species" or the next higher 
level.   For example, not "this oak tree in my yard"  but "oak tree", or 
even "tree".  "immigrants", not "Juan Rodrigo".  Adding perjorative 
stereotyped adjectives probably changes the abstraction level and tends to 
hook into emotional (non-rational) stereotype processing, adding power to 
the manipulation.

ChatGPT-like agents would be able to assemble such language if asked with 
the right prompts.

On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:11:49 PM UTC-5 David Szent-Györgyi wrote:

> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Imo, we have every right to consider the need to address manipulation by 
> machines employing AI.  Period :-)
>
> Yes, but I am academically-minded, and I expect to argue my case - because 
> I do not expect to be believed unless I present a sound argument. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/68583156-f03f-48ec-922a-e3709c314c4dn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-29 Thread David Szent-Györgyi
Thanks for your comments.

Imo, we have every right to consider the need to address manipulation by 
machines employing AI.  Period :-)

Yes, but I am academically-minded, and I expect to argue my case - because 
I do not expect to be believed unless I present a sound argument. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/533c99b2-0a91-412d-913c-caf2aa213e1cn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-29 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 5:12 PM David Szent-Györgyi 
wrote:

Bear with me. What follows is Not Brief.
>

[Big snip]

If we accept Hayakawa's arguments, we have every right to consider the need
> to address manipulation by machines employing AI and the levels of
> abstraction in that, and the abstraction in their communications with human
> beings.
>

Thanks for your comments.

Imo, we have every right to consider the need to address manipulation by
machines employing AI.  Period :-)

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS1XpmgmNF0YXbyhpMHmTESStUwCw9VP_ECG7ip7_svHXw%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-29 Thread David Szent-Györgyi
Bear with me. What follows is Not Brief. 

Understanding and deployment of the current wave of AI require 
understanding of two works of The Twentieth Century. One is Kurt Gödel's 
Incompleteness Theorems. The other is Alfred Korzybski's General Semantics, 
as explained by S. I. Hayakawa. 

Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems are a follow-on to the work of Alfred North 
Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, who in the the second decade of the 
Twentieth Century published *Principia Mathematica. *The Wikipedia article 
on that work  provides 
a useful summary: 

«*PM*, according to its introduction, had three aims: (1) to analyze to the 
greatest possible extent the ideas and methods of mathematical logic and to 
minimize the number of primitive notions, axioms, and inference rules; (2) 
to precisely express mathematical propositions in symbolic logic using the 
most convenient notation that precise expression allows; (3) to solve the 
paradoxes that plagued logic and set theory at the turn of the 20th century 
. . .»

That article continues: 

«There is no doubt that *PM* is of great importance in the history of 
mathematics and philosophy: as Irvine has noted, it sparked interest in 
symbolic logic and advanced the subject by popularizing it; it showcased 
the powers and capacities of symbolic logic; and it showed how advances in 
philosophy of mathematics and symbolic logic could go hand-in-hand with 
tremendous fruitfulness. Indeed, *PM* was in part brought about by an 
interest in logicism, the view on which all mathematical truths are logical 
truths. It was in part thanks to the advances made in *PM* that, despite 
its defects, numerous advances in meta-logic were made, including Gödel's 
incompleteness theorems.»

Gödel made public his Incompleteness Theorems in 1930. From the Wikipedia 
article on him : 

«These theorems ended a half-century of attempts, beginning with the work 
of Gottlob Frege and culminating in *Principia Mathematica* and Hilbert's 
Program, to find a non-relatively consistent axiomatization sufficient for 
number theory (that was to serve as the foundation for other fields of 
mathematics).
In hindsight, the basic idea at the heart of the incompleteness theorem is 
rather simple. Gödel essentially constructed a formula that claims that it 
is unprovable in a given formal system. If it were provable, it would be 
false. Thus there will always be at least one true but unprovable 
statement. That is, for any computably enumerable set of axioms for 
arithmetic (that is, a set that can in principle be printed out by an 
idealized computer with unlimited resources), there is a formula that is 
true of arithmetic, but which is not provable in that system.»

The Incompleteness Theorems prove that any system of logic has one of two 
flaws: if it is internally consistent, there is a truth that cannot be 
derived within it; if it is universal ("always provable"), it must 
mishandle at least one proof, producing an incorrect result. 

*This applies to digital computer programs, which implement machines; such 
machines are by definition abstracted constructs of statements that fall 
within a system of logic. *What sense we are to make of such machines needs 
to be discussed, since those machines' workings are complex and beyond the 
examination of human beings. 

Hayakawa's book *Language in Thought and Action *was published in 1949, and 
intended to provide a toolkit for defense against manipulation via forms of 
communication that include propaganda, advertisement,  and popular 
entertainment. Hayakawa reformulates findings of Alfred Korzybski's General 
Semantics: he calls upon the reader to distinguish between their internal 
model of the world and the world itself, with the admonition that "the map 
is not the territory".  He presents the idea of a "ladder of abstraction" 
in which a rung is more abstract than the one below it. He argues that 
manipulative communications - in propaganda, in advertisement, in popular 
culture - are more easily applied at higher levels of abstraction. He 
advises the reader to beware such manipulation, and to promote more honest 
and productive communication by pitching discussion at lower rungs when 
possible. 

The founders of General Semantics were beings of their time and place, 
describing their work as a theoretical and a practical system whose 
adoption can reliably alter human behavior in the direction of greater 
sanity. Looking back on that from 2023, one can see arrogance in their a 
position. One can wonder whether they were aware of the implications of 
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems for their own system of logic. 

That said, it is worth recalling Hayakawa's teachings in the present 
discussion. Hayakawa wrote about human constructs. ChatGPT is a machine, an 
abstraction with assumptions and logic that are not open to inspection, one 
that communicate

Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-26 Thread Thomas Passin
Here's an interesting post on Large Language Models, ChatGPT, and AI more 
generally -

Janus' Simulators 

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 12:24:44 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:10 AM Thomas Passin  wrote:
>
> With ChatGPT, the user can tune up the result by careful crafting of the 
>> input instructions.  It apparently takes skill and experience to do this 
>> effectively.  
>>
>
> I don't think ChatGPT is trustworthy enough right now. That's why I'll 
> stick to google.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/90042d5d-d4f6-476c-b068-82844f2fc1e2n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-23 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:10 AM Thomas Passin  wrote:

With ChatGPT, the user can tune up the result by careful crafting of the
> input instructions.  It apparently takes skill and experience to do this
> effectively.
>

I don't think ChatGPT is trustworthy enough right now. That's why I'll
stick to google.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS10mwA2QFbjZrqz4oAej_mwcberryMb54vEB7mh4ROHag%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT? Beware of ChatGPT

2023-01-23 Thread Thomas Passin
The thing about ChatGPT and similar neural network systems is that they 
know how to string words and phrases together based on probability 
densities estimated during training, but they don't know about the 
underlying concepts.  They don't know math but they can *sound* like they 
know math.  So the output might or might not be correct, and you would have 
to check it carefully to be sure.

It a way, the chatbot acts like it is in a dream state.  In a dream state, 
various parts of the brain are working, but they are not coordinated and 
not subject to reality checks, so they just free-wheel along.  You, the 
dreamer, may become somewhat aware of some of that activity, but you can't 
provide the feedback that would adjust the output to the real world and to 
reality checks like "common sense".

With ChatGPT, the user can tune up the result by careful crafting of the 
input instructions.  It apparently takes skill and experience to do this 
effectively.  An experienced person with a good eye together with the bot 
might make a really good artist even though neither alone does.  Presumably 
a person can do some tuning to improve the chances of getting a good 
working script.  But still, it might or might not do what you want.
On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 9:27:12 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> As we has discussed recently, ChatGPT can do amazing things.
>
> Otoh, yesterday I experienced its limitations. ChatGPT *seems* 
> authoritative, but my new rule of thumb is: use google if ChatGPT gives 
> advice that doesn't "just work".
>
> google's searches return what could be called primary sources. There seems 
> to be no way to discover how ChatGPT says what it does.
>
> Yesterday I asked ChatGPT several questions about rendering 
> SplashScreen.svg. None of those suggestions worked and I spent hours trying 
> to make them work.  Today I started afresh with google. The fixes still 
> weren't trivial, but I eventually got the job done.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/5529399f-70cd-4d4a-8c6a-af572a1811acn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT: My study of Rope

2023-01-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:02 PM Zoom.Quiet  wrote:

> Wow join rope develop long time ?
> means Leo's develop need refactoring tools always?
>

Leo might be a better refactoring platform than Rope :-) I'm interested in
Rope primarily because of its type inference.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS0wto%2BBgDkm8AQYATD%3DbXu0BKP5kejgAauD_-f_8hPtMw%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT: My study of Rope

2023-01-05 Thread Zoom.Quiet
Wow join rope develop long time ?
means Leo's develop need refactoring tools always?

Edward K. Ream  于2023年1月6日周五 03:30写道:
>
> This Engineering Notebook post discusses recent investigations into Rope's 
> type inference. It may be of interest to some.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/dcd748b8-7658-4be1-8f7d-cfe76d9915cfn%40googlegroups.com.



-- 

life is pathetic, go Pythonic. 人生苦短, Python当歌 ;-)
课: https://py.101.camp/
怼: https://du.101.camp/
俺: http://zoomquiet.io
许: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/cn/
怒: 冗余不做,日子甭过!备份不做,十恶不赦.
KM keep growing environment culture which promoting organization learning ;-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAAFijRcR1%2BXfa-1PZaFGj%2B5UR4q_3dbqcWXzUr6dAQPyxfFD8w%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread jkn
it probably depends on your keyboard nationality as well...

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 2:34:32 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:

> For me, I barely notice typing the underscore, but my hands really dislike 
> typing a "#" for a comment.  So when I need a line-oriented data format of 
> my own, I usually allow a ";" as well as a "#" to comment out a line.
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 9:29:13 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've seen those kind of studies - and ones with different findings, 
>> as you may well have.
>>
>> I don't think that (for *me*) there is much difference in the 'cognitive 
>> effort' between the two styles. But there is more effort in typing 
>> snake_case (both the extra character, and the necessary hand/finger 
>> movements). The latter effort might be a bit specific to me; I have a 
>> slightly malformed right hand which means I tend to type underscores in a 
>> particular way.
>>
>> Anyway, there are better things than this to pound the table about...
>>
>> J^n
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 2:08:54 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW (maybe not much), Wikipedia's page on CamelCase includes this -
>>>
>>> 'A 2010 follow-up study, with other subjects containing mainly 
>>> pre-trained programmers and using an improved measurement method with use 
>>> of eye-tracking equipment, indicates: "While results indicate no difference 
>>> in accuracy between the two styles, subjects recognize identifiers in the 
>>> underscore style more quickly." '
>>>
>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:05:23 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>>>
 ...

>>> It's a bit crude but gives me most of what I want. I am reminded why I 
 prefer camelCase though, too many extra keystrokes and hand movements, for 
 little to no extra readability IMO.

>>> ...

>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/08dec747-b768-4cde-a37f-fd0abf589e06n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread Thomas Passin
For me, I barely notice typing the underscore, but my hands really dislike 
typing a "#" for a comment.  So when I need a line-oriented data format of 
my own, I usually allow a ";" as well as a "#" to comment out a line.

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 9:29:13 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:

> Yeah, I've seen those kind of studies - and ones with different findings, 
> as you may well have.
>
> I don't think that (for *me*) there is much difference in the 'cognitive 
> effort' between the two styles. But there is more effort in typing 
> snake_case (both the extra character, and the necessary hand/finger 
> movements). The latter effort might be a bit specific to me; I have a 
> slightly malformed right hand which means I tend to type underscores in a 
> particular way.
>
> Anyway, there are better things than this to pound the table about...
>
> J^n
>
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 2:08:54 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> FWIW (maybe not much), Wikipedia's page on CamelCase includes this -
>>
>> 'A 2010 follow-up study, with other subjects containing mainly 
>> pre-trained programmers and using an improved measurement method with use 
>> of eye-tracking equipment, indicates: "While results indicate no difference 
>> in accuracy between the two styles, subjects recognize identifiers in the 
>> underscore style more quickly." '
>>
>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:05:23 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> It's a bit crude but gives me most of what I want. I am reminded why I 
>>> prefer camelCase though, too many extra keystrokes and hand movements, for 
>>> little to no extra readability IMO.
>>>
>> ...
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/e1d308b9-103a-4831-a0ee-7a1a6002b5e5n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread jkn
Yeah, I've seen those kind of studies - and ones with different findings, 
as you may well have.

I don't think that (for *me*) there is much difference in the 'cognitive 
effort' between the two styles. But there is more effort in typing 
snake_case (both the extra character, and the necessary hand/finger 
movements). The latter effort might be a bit specific to me; I have a 
slightly malformed right hand which means I tend to type underscores in a 
particular way.

Anyway, there are better things than this to pound the table about...

J^n


On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 2:08:54 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote:

> FWIW (maybe not much), Wikipedia's page on CamelCase includes this -
>
> 'A 2010 follow-up study, with other subjects containing mainly pre-trained 
> programmers and using an improved measurement method with use of 
> eye-tracking equipment, indicates: "While results indicate no difference in 
> accuracy between the two styles, subjects recognize identifiers in the 
> underscore style more quickly." '
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:05:23 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
> It's a bit crude but gives me most of what I want. I am reminded why I 
>> prefer camelCase though, too many extra keystrokes and hand movements, for 
>> little to no extra readability IMO.
>>
> ...
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/a61b2403-17f1-4474-a84c-c1b93180d877n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread Thomas Passin
FWIW (maybe not much), Wikipedia's page on CamelCase includes this -

'A 2010 follow-up study, with other subjects containing mainly pre-trained 
programmers and using an improved measurement method with use of 
eye-tracking equipment, indicates: "While results indicate no difference in 
accuracy between the two styles, subjects recognize identifiers in the 
underscore style more quickly." '

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:05:23 AM UTC-4 jkn wrote:

> ...
> It's a bit crude but gives me most of what I want. I am reminded why I 
> prefer camelCase though, too many extra keystrokes and hand movements, for 
> little to no extra readability IMO.
> ...
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/f437a05d-61b8-45fb-9e4a-0be0f04cce79n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread jkn
Yeah ... I wrote a small script which runs pylint and captures the output, 
then looks at the errors and applies a few simple heuristics to get a list 
of the changes I want, then does a replace() on that list.

It's a bit crude but gives me most of what I want. I am reminded why I 
prefer camelCase though, too many extra keystrokes and hand movements, for 
little to no extra readability IMO.

Oh well...

Thanks, J^n

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:02:50 AM UTC+1 jkn wrote:

> Hi Thomas
> that was pretty much the approach I was thinking of adopting myself, 
> thanks. I was just a bit surprised that something like that didn't already 
> exist.
>
> Anyway, in the absence of anything else I'll see what that gives me.
>
> Cheers, J^n
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 11:16:25 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> pylint by default will issue message C0103 for functions and methods that 
>> should be snake_case but aren't (Leo's configuration doesn't seem to pick 
>> that up).  Since the pylint message will include line and position of the 
>> name, it shouldn't be hard to write a program to convert these instances.  
>> If you did a string.replace() for each of them, the names would get fixed 
>> in docstrings and comments too.
>>
>> Pylint by default issues the same warning for short variable names 
>> without an underscore like "x", too.  I don't know if that can be turned 
>> off or not, but I imagine it could be checked for easily.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 4:11:17 PM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>> slightly OT but I think this is a good place to ask:
>>>
>>> I tend to write my personal python using camelCase for variables and 
>>> method names;
>>> I prefer this to the PEP8 standard for various reasons.
>>>
>>> I now have a need to convert some such scripts to snake_case, to meet
>>> a linting requirement. I thought that there would be plenty of tools to 
>>> do this,
>>> but rather to my surprise the various checkers and formatters I have 
>>> found
>>> (in a fairly cursory search, admittedly) don't cater for this. They all 
>>> do plenty
>>> of other things, and I will definitely be using them in the future, but 
>>> I could
>>> do with this as a staring point.
>>>
>>> Any pointers to a tool which can do this job, probably with some 
>>> flexible configuration?
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> J^n
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/4da6017c-a676-46c6-b935-4b95aae50388n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-15 Thread jkn
Hi Thomas
that was pretty much the approach I was thinking of adopting myself, 
thanks. I was just a bit surprised that something like that didn't already 
exist.

Anyway, in the absence of anything else I'll see what that gives me.

Cheers, J^n


On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 11:16:25 PM UTC+1 tbp1...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> pylint by default will issue message C0103 for functions and methods that 
> should be snake_case but aren't (Leo's configuration doesn't seem to pick 
> that up).  Since the pylint message will include line and position of the 
> name, it shouldn't be hard to write a program to convert these instances.  
> If you did a string.replace() for each of them, the names would get fixed 
> in docstrings and comments too.
>
> Pylint by default issues the same warning for short variable names without 
> an underscore like "x", too.  I don't know if that can be turned off or 
> not, but I imagine it could be checked for easily.
>
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 4:11:17 PM UTC-4 jkn wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>> slightly OT but I think this is a good place to ask:
>>
>> I tend to write my personal python using camelCase for variables and 
>> method names;
>> I prefer this to the PEP8 standard for various reasons.
>>
>> I now have a need to convert some such scripts to snake_case, to meet
>> a linting requirement. I thought that there would be plenty of tools to 
>> do this,
>> but rather to my surprise the various checkers and formatters I have found
>> (in a fairly cursory search, admittedly) don't cater for this. They all 
>> do plenty
>> of other things, and I will definitely be using them in the future, but I 
>> could
>> do with this as a staring point.
>>
>> Any pointers to a tool which can do this job, probably with some flexible 
>> configuration?
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> J^n
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/3a550068-0c40-40f9-a099-659e39630badn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT-ish: convert script from camelCase to snake_case

2022-09-14 Thread Thomas Passin
pylint by default will issue message C0103 for functions and methods that 
should be snake_case but aren't (Leo's configuration doesn't seem to pick 
that up).  Since the pylint message will include line and position of the 
name, it shouldn't be hard to write a program to convert these instances.  
If you did a string.replace() for each of them, the names would get fixed 
in docstrings and comments too.

Pylint by default issues the same warning for short variable names without 
an underscore like "x", too.  I don't know if that can be turned off or 
not, but I imagine it could be checked for easily.

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 4:11:17 PM UTC-4 jkn wrote:

> Hi all
> slightly OT but I think this is a good place to ask:
>
> I tend to write my personal python using camelCase for variables and 
> method names;
> I prefer this to the PEP8 standard for various reasons.
>
> I now have a need to convert some such scripts to snake_case, to meet
> a linting requirement. I thought that there would be plenty of tools to do 
> this,
> but rather to my surprise the various checkers and formatters I have found
> (in a fairly cursory search, admittedly) don't cater for this. They all do 
> plenty
> of other things, and I will definitely be using them in the future, but I 
> could
> do with this as a staring point.
>
> Any pointers to a tool which can do this job, probably with some flexible 
> configuration?
>
> Thanks & Regards
> J^n
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/6b01ab73-423d-4c3c-b446-e037dd5225ean%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT: My paintings

2020-09-12 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 8:30 AM k-hen  wrote:

> I like those a lot. Well done :-)
>

Thank you.


> I was an art minor in school but haven't made my way back to it since
> moving on to my professional life. I really miss it.
>
> The book 'Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain' sparked a transformative
> changed my life - i.e. changing brain modalities.
>

This was one of the very few books that actually changed my life. If you
think you can't draw, you definitely should read it.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS2bNbXbq4iywEo2WUPZUbxE4EAfz3db5pvULUnCbUsMkg%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT: My paintings

2020-09-12 Thread k-hen
I like those a lot. Well done :-) 

I was an art minor in school but haven't made my way back to it since 
moving on to my professional life. I really miss it. 

The book 'Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain' sparked a transformative 
changed my life - i.e. changing brain modalities.
Also correlates with the excellent programming(ish) book 'Pragmatic 
Thinking & Learning: Refactoring your Wetware'

If you enjoy those topics I also recommend seeing Jill Bolte Taylor's TED 
talk:
https://www.ted.com/talks/jill_bolte_taylor_my_stroke_of_insight


Kevin



On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 6:18:54 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> This page  on Flickr 
> now contains photos of my acrylic paintings. 
>
> For my recent work I have documented the evolution of each painting by 
> taking a photo after each painting session. As you will see, it doesn't 
> much matter what the painting looks like at first :-)
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/1e6b7599-3265-4372-85d0-105052c045d5n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT: American Scientist: Expanding Consciousness

2019-11-16 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:51 PM Matt Wilkie  wrote:

> Fascinating! Saving for a re-read over the weekend when I can reflect on
> it more completely.
>

Glad you enjoyed it.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3LzqCYFgaNUZgK33T2P-x2CfMRMnAPao-OqOG6H9ZBwQ%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: OT: American Scientist: Expanding Consciousness

2019-11-15 Thread Matt Wilkie
Fascinating! Saving for a re-read over the weekend when I can reflect on it 
more completely.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/312d0fd8-0532-4958-8e9d-892a0abe10c1%40googlegroups.com.


Re: OT - New Custom Editor That is Built On... Wait For It... Nodes

2018-04-16 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Chris George  wrote:

> Enjoy.
>
> https://open.nytimes.com/building-a-text-editor-for-a-
> digital-first-newsroom-f1cb8367fc21
>

​Thanks for this link.  I added a comment about Leo in the comments part of
the page.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-04-13 Thread Matt Wilkie
What a richness of thoughts and links in this thread. Another project to 
draw inspiration from: *Glitch Rewind*.
https://medium.com/glitch/reinventing-version-control-with-glitch-rewind-914c350da442

"...with Rewind, you can see *every* change, every commit, and walk 
backwards in time through all those edits, just by scrolling back on the 
timeline. It’s as easy as rewinding a video on YouTube"

matt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Of course, the advantage of Joe Orr's Leo Vue demo is that it provides a
single link to follow, which is what happens with most of the web native
apps, with nothing to install, just a link and you're done (provided
that you have good connectivity, which doesn't happen in a lot of places
of the world, for example just two hours away of here or even in some
parts of capital cities in the Global South).

But neither Leo or Grafoscopio can provide a single link experience.
Demos are just full of text, instructions to follow and software to
install and update, as happens with most of desktop apps, that works
well without connectivity. Fortunately not having a single link to
experience Leo (without reading, downloading, installing, executing and
going to the community for more learning) was not a prerequisite for
current users to experience Leo. We would never know about it, with such
prerequisite.

Cheers,

Offray


On 20/03/18 10:30, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 20/03/18 04:02, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>> Comparing the fluency and momentum I get with Pharo with Python
>> or Javascript or similar file based and indirect techs, is
>> difficult to invest time in learning them deeply
>>
>>
>> ​I'm glad you are exploring the Pharo world.  The world doesn't
>> especially need more Python or Javascript programmers ;-)
>> ​
>
> I totally agree :-).
>
>>  
>>
>> I really like the idea of live coding and making code talk being
>> explored in different technologies. I think there is a lot to
>> learn from cross
>> ​ ​
>> pollination of ideas and communities.
>>
>> At least, that's what I'm trying with Grafoscopio, mixing ideas
>> from Leo, IPython, Smalltalk and some of my own harvest.
>>
>>
>> ​Please continue to keep us informed. What I would like to see from
>> you is a demo as thrilling as Joe Orr's LeoVue demo
>> .  Make that only link you
>> send us, so we will be sure to follow it ;-)
>>
>
> I don't have such demo, at least not easily consumable as just
> pointing to a web page, like in Joe's case, because web is not my
> primary focus now (I think that web kind of sucks as a programming
> platform and is really convoluted as a publishing one, but has the big
> advantage of ubiquity). But we have some demos.
>
>   * A short video[1] of what is possible mixing live coding and
> outlining for the case of the Panama Papers[2]
>
> [1]
> 
> http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/dataweek/doc/tip/wiki/grafoscopio/video.html
> [2] http://mutabit.com/offray/blog/en/entry/panama-papers-1
>
>   * Complete books/manuals done or opened with Grafoscopio, like the
> Grafoscopio Manual[3], The Data Journalism Manual[4][5]
>
> [3]
> 
> http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/doc/tip/Docs/En/Books/Manual/manual.pdf
> [4] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/mapeda/uv/mapeda.pdf
> [5] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/mapeda/doc/tip/intro.md
>
>   * Customized agile data visualization for a comparative study on
> released medicine information on 16 countries[6].
> [6] http://mutabit.com/offray/blog/en/entry/sdv-infomed
>
> And this semester we are preparing some Twitter Data Selfies
> project... so yes, I will keep you informed. At least with some ideas
> I can give back to a community that has been so welcoming and
> inspiring like this one.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Offray
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi,


On 20/03/18 04:02, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> Comparing the fluency and momentum I get with Pharo with Python or
> Javascript or similar file based and indirect techs, is difficult
> to invest time in learning them deeply
>
>
> ​I'm glad you are exploring the Pharo world.  The world doesn't
> especially need more Python or Javascript programmers ;-)
> ​

I totally agree :-).

>  
>
> I really like the idea of live coding and making code talk being
> explored in different technologies. I think there is a lot to
> learn from cross
> ​ ​
> pollination of ideas and communities.
>
> At least, that's what I'm trying with Grafoscopio, mixing ideas
> from Leo, IPython, Smalltalk and some of my own harvest.
>
>
> ​Please continue to keep us informed. What I would like to see from
> you is a demo as thrilling as Joe Orr's LeoVue demo
> .  Make that only link you
> send us, so we will be sure to follow it ;-)
>

I don't have such demo, at least not easily consumable as just pointing
to a web page, like in Joe's case, because web is not my primary focus
now (I think that web kind of sucks as a programming platform and is
really convoluted as a publishing one, but has the big advantage of
ubiquity). But we have some demos.

  * A short video[1] of what is possible mixing live coding and
outlining for the case of the Panama Papers[2]

[1]
http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/dataweek/doc/tip/wiki/grafoscopio/video.html
[2] http://mutabit.com/offray/blog/en/entry/panama-papers-1

  * Complete books/manuals done or opened with Grafoscopio, like the
Grafoscopio Manual[3], The Data Journalism Manual[4][5]

[3]

http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/doc/tip/Docs/En/Books/Manual/manual.pdf
[4] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/mapeda/uv/mapeda.pdf
[5] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/mapeda/doc/tip/intro.md

  * Customized agile data visualization for a comparative study on
released medicine information on 16 countries[6].
[6] http://mutabit.com/offray/blog/en/entry/sdv-infomed

And this semester we are preparing some Twitter Data Selfies project...
so yes, I will keep you informed. At least with some ideas I can give
back to a community that has been so welcoming and inspiring like this one.

Cheers,

Offray


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-20 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
off...@riseup.net> wrote:

I still remember the day when, just three months after using Pharo and its
> ecosystem, I was able to prototype an outliner with live coding [8] nodes,
> something I was proposing/trying with Leo + IPython without much
> advancements for years
>

​Excellent. Such memories extremely rare.  There are really only three or
four similar memories in Leo's entire history.​


Comparing the fluency and momentum I get with Pharo with Python or
> Javascript or similar file based and indirect techs, is difficult to invest
> time in learning them deeply
>

​I'm glad you are exploring the Pharo world.  The world doesn't especially
need more Python or Javascript programmers ;-)
​


> I really like the idea of live coding and making code talk being explored
> in different technologies. I think there is a lot to learn from cross
> ​ ​
> pollination of ideas and communities.
>
At least, that's what I'm trying with Grafoscopio, mixing ideas from Leo,
> IPython, Smalltalk and some of my own harvest.
>

​Please continue to keep us informed. What I would like to see from you is
a demo as thrilling as Joe Orr's LeoVue demo
.  Make that only link you send
us, so we will be sure to follow it ;-)

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-19 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi,

On "talking code", I have not found nothing better that Smalltalk,
specially current incarnations (like Pharo[1]) that feed on a long
tradition of live coding[1a], mainly because you can create custom tools
with custom presentations that can accommodate to your work flows and
needs investing just half and hour or less. See for example a moldable
objects inspector in [2][3], a customized and powerful playground with
live objects preview[4], where you play with objects[5] or see your
whole software project as a graph[6]. Other examples, about such
moldable environment that made the "code talk" can be found at [7]

[1] http://pharo.org/
[1a]
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-essence-of-Smalltalk/answer/Dimitris-Chloupis
[2] http://scg.unibe.ch/research/moldableinspector
[3]
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/the-moldable-gtinspector-deconstructed
[4] http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/introducing-the-gtplayground/
[5] https://vimeo.com/channels/ndc2014/97315968
[6] https://vimeo.com/94724841
[7] https://feenk.com/

I still remember the day when, just three months after using Pharo and
its ecosystem, I was able to prototype an outliner with live coding [8]
nodes, something I was proposing/trying with Leo + IPython without much
advancements for years [9] (that post is older that the original idea).

[8] https://twitter.com/offrayLC/status/500803908424712192
[9]
http://mutabit.com/offray/static/blog/output/posts/on-deepness-and-complexity-of-ipython-documents.html

Comparing the fluency and momentum I get with Pharo with Python or
Javascript or similar file based and indirect techs, is difficult to
invest time in learning them deeply (I was kind of an ethernal newbie on
them). But I really like the idea of live coding and making code talk
being explored in different technologies. I think there is a lot to
learn from crosspollination of ideas and communities. At least, that's
what I'm trying with Grafoscopio, mixing ideas from Leo, IPython,
Smalltalk and some of my own harvest.

Cheers,

Offray

On 18/03/18 03:15, Xavier G. Domingo (xgid) wrote:
> Great! Many thanks for your encouraging words. 
>
> So I think I should try to explain first what I mean by "talking
> code". The idea is simple: when someone tells you that he is a
> programmer, he's telling you what he DOES. But that's not, by far, all
> he IS. There's much more he can *tell* you about him: how are his
> parents, where does he live, what's his recent history of life events,
> his preferences...
>
> Well, any code we see is normally telling us what it DOES (at least in
> imperative programming languages). Sometimes, if the programmer has
> taken the care and time to add comments, it will tell you WHY it does
> it, it's INTENT and maybe even some reasons WHY it does it in the way
> it does. But I want it to tell me also about it's recent past history
> (git commits), all it's parents (commit authors), who is using it
> (callers), how well is it doing what it does (profiling), what kind of
> data it uses to handle and so on. We have tools to gather all that
> info, but the point is that I want the code itself to *tell me *this
> all the time, in a natural way.
>
> OK, enough poetry. Let's go to the Vision: my ideal IDE is the one
> that tells you all the info related to the code at hand in a
> non-intrusive, expressive, a click-away manner, all the time. The main
> info I would like to have "shown around the code" includes, amongst
> others:
>
>   * Comments, by author
>   * Git info (git log, git blame)
>   * Tests that test that code
>   * Examples of input and output data
>   * Type info
>   * Callers and uses
>   * Bugs that have impacted the code, by severity, date
>   * Benchmarks
>   * Profiling
>
>  (the list above is in no particular order of preference)
>
> The IDE should have to handle the different levels of granularity
> needed (module, class, method, function) and show the info accordingly.
>
> The key feature here is the *density of information without cluttering
> up the visual space*. That's probably the most tricky part. And that's
> the "visual side" of the question: the best the IDE can show all this
> info in a visual expressive way, the better. My idea is that the IDE
> shows summaries of the relevant info (visually or textually) around
> the code and a hover and/or click takes you to the details. Of course,
> the idea is not "new" in any sense. IDEs are already doing some of the
> above with mixed success, but I would like to bring it to Leo.
>
> Do you think that something like this will be possible with Leo? 
>
> Please, your comments Amigos! ;-)
>
> Xavier
>
> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 1:36:56 PM UTC-3, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
> ​An exciting goal.  I'll help you any way I can.
>
> Edward
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@goo

Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-18 Thread Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)
Great Terry! For me it's a meaningful first step, just in the perfect 
moment! Thanks a lot for sharing. Amongst all the infos I would like to 
"have close", it is probably one of the most importants.

What I would like to have for tests would be something like this (but 
nicer, of course):



So when the drop-box is clicked, it will show something like this:




And selecting one test from the list will take you to the test code or 
whatever we define.

What do you think? Is something like this possible in any way?

As you probably remember, I already asked for something similar in the past 
related to an easy way to visualize node tags in the headlines. Well, this 
goes in the same direction regarding the "extension of Leo's outline 
rendering capabilities"... or how would you call that to give it a proper 
name?

Xavier

On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 11:28:53 AM UTC-3, Terry Brown wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:15:04 -0700 (PDT) 
> "Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)" > wrote: 
>
> https://github.com/leo-editor/snippets/blob/master/utils/pytest_switch.py 
>
> is an example of how Leo can help bring a function and its unit test 
> closer together.  That code could be made smarter, in particular it 
> should search upwards for an existing tests folder better, but just 
> pointing it out. 
>
> You do feel very virtuous when you write the test for a function before 
> the function :-) 
>
> Cheers -Terry 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-18 Thread Terry Brown
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
"Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)"  wrote:

> OK, enough poetry. Let's go to the Vision: my ideal IDE is the one
> that tells you all the info related to the code at hand in a
> non-intrusive, expressive, a click-away manner, all the time. The
> main info I would like to have "shown around the code" includes,
> amongst others:
> 
>- Comments, by author
>- Git info (git log, git blame)
>- Tests that test that code

https://github.com/leo-editor/snippets/blob/master/utils/pytest_switch.py

is an example of how Leo can help bring a function and its unit test
closer together.  That code could be made smarter, in particular it
should search upwards for an existing tests folder better, but just
pointing it out.

You do feel very virtuous when you write the test for a function before
the function :-)

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-18 Thread Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)
Great! Many thanks for your encouraging words. 

So I think I should try to explain first what I mean by "talking code". The 
idea is simple: when someone tells you that he is a programmer, he's 
telling you what he DOES. But that's not, by far, all he IS. There's much 
more he can *tell* you about him: how are his parents, where does he live, 
what's his recent history of life events, his preferences...

Well, any code we see is normally telling us what it DOES (at least in 
imperative programming languages). Sometimes, if the programmer has taken 
the care and time to add comments, it will tell you WHY it does it, it's 
INTENT and maybe even some reasons WHY it does it in the way it does. But I 
want it to tell me also about it's recent past history (git commits), all 
it's parents (commit authors), who is using it (callers), how well is it 
doing what it does (profiling), what kind of data it uses to handle and so 
on. We have tools to gather all that info, but the point is that I want the 
code itself to *tell me *this all the time, in a natural way.

OK, enough poetry. Let's go to the Vision: my ideal IDE is the one that 
tells you all the info related to the code at hand in a non-intrusive, 
expressive, a click-away manner, all the time. The main info I would like 
to have "shown around the code" includes, amongst others:

   - Comments, by author
   - Git info (git log, git blame)
   - Tests that test that code
   - Examples of input and output data
   - Type info
   - Callers and uses
   - Bugs that have impacted the code, by severity, date
   - Benchmarks
   - Profiling

 (the list above is in no particular order of preference)

The IDE should have to handle the different levels of granularity needed 
(module, class, method, function) and show the info accordingly.

The key feature here is the *density of information without cluttering up 
the visual space*. That's probably the most tricky part. And that's the 
"visual side" of the question: the best the IDE can show all this info in a 
visual expressive way, the better. My idea is that the IDE shows summaries 
of the relevant info (visually or textually) around the code and a hover 
and/or click takes you to the details. Of course, the idea is not "new" in 
any sense. IDEs are already doing some of the above with mixed success, but 
I would like to bring it to Leo.

Do you think that something like this will be possible with Leo? 

Please, your comments Amigos! ;-)

Xavier

On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 1:36:56 PM UTC-3, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
> ​An exciting goal.  I'll help you any way I can.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Xavier G. Domingo (xgid) <
xgdomi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have to admit that we are on the same boat here! After 30 years of
> programming, with 20+ programming languages including rare gems like
> CLIPPER and CHILL, I knew I was at home when I found Python. And I'm not
> going to change this, at least on this life! But I know that we *can get
> the goal with Python* (maybe with some help from the javascript world,
> but under control :-) ). My focus is NOT so much on the data visualization
> side of the question, but on the "talking code" side of it, to say it in
> some way.
>

​An exciting goal.  I'll help you any way I can.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-17 Thread Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)
I have to admit that we are on the same boat here! After 30 years of 
programming, with 20+ programming languages including rare gems like 
CLIPPER and CHILL, I knew I was at home when I found Python. And I'm not 
going to change this, at least on this life! But I know that we *can get 
the goal with Python* (maybe with some help from the javascript world, but 
under control :-) ). My focus is NOT so much on the data visualization side 
of the question, but on the "talking code" side of it, to say it in some 
way.

The main limits to this goal are ourselves. Always!

I will be glad to have you in this journey for the live code! Do we start?

Xavier

On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 6:50:28 AM UTC-3, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
> ​As I understand him, Offray would agree with you.  It's a highly laudable 
> goal.  I just don't want to give up python to accomplish it.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Xavier G. Domingo (xgid) <
xgdomi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matt, thanks for sharing this!
>
> It seems that Bostock is a strong follower of Bret Victor, which I've
> found always quite inspiring on better ways of programming. The work at
> observablehq.com  seems strongly focused
> on intensive data manipulation and visualization, but the general idea of
> "live code" it's something I think we all should be after in some way, to
> make someday programming be a real joy for anyone. I'm on this quest also!
>

​As I understand him, Offray would agree with you.  It's a highly laudable
goal.  I just don't want to give up python to accomplish it.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-16 Thread Xavier G. Domingo (xgid)
Hi Matt, thanks for sharing this! 

It seems that Bostock is a strong follower of Bret Victor, which I've found 
always quite inspiring on better ways of programming. The work at 
observablehq.com  seems strongly focused on 
intensive data manipulation and visualization, but the general idea of 
"live code" it's something I think we all should be after in some way, to 
make someday programming be a real joy for anyone. I'm on this quest also!

Xavier

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 1:02:17 PM UTC-3, Matt Wilkie wrote:
>
> I'm continually in awe of Mike Bostock's work, c.f. Data Driven Documents (
> d3.org). Impressive as that is, it's his power to clearly explain data, 
> visualization and programming in cohesive bundle that transforms my 
> thinking which impresses me most. I've not yet learned to do anything 
> substantive in javascript, but reading Bostock's material has given me 
> insight into own python projects. And a thirst to do more!
>
> https://medium.com/@mbostock/a-better-way-to-code-2b1d2876a3a0
>
> Just, wow.
>
> Matt
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-16 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Matt Wilkie  wrote:

>
> I'm continually in awe of Mike Bostock's work, c.f. Data Driven Documents (
>> d3.org). ...
>>
>
> should have been https://d3js.org/
>

​Yes, d3 is cool.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-15 Thread Matt Wilkie


> I'm continually in awe of Mike Bostock's work, c.f. Data Driven Documents (
> d3.org). ...
>

should have been https://d3js.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-15 Thread Matt Wilkie


> ​I'm wary of flashy demos that don't actually involve programming.
>

Wariness on the internet is justified! Here's the real thing: 
https://beta.observablehq.com/

matt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: A better way to code, by Mike Bostock

2018-03-15 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Matt Wilkie  wrote:

> I'm continually in awe of Mike Bostock's work, c.f. Data Driven Documents (
> d3.org). Impressive as that is, it's his power to clearly explain data,
> visualization and programming in cohesive bundle that transforms my
> thinking which impresses me most. I've not yet learned to do anything
> substantive in javascript, but reading Bostock's material has given me
> insight into own python projects. And a thirst to do more!
>
> https://medium.com/@mbostock/a-better-way-to-code-2b1d2876a3a0
>
> Just, wow.
>

​I'm wary of flashy demos that don't actually involve programming.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Duolingo language courses

2018-02-04 Thread Zoom.Quiet
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:
> Duolingo is a free, online way to learn a language.  It has some advantages
> over Rosetta Stone, besides price.
>
...
> I took a peek at the Chinese and Greek courses to see how they handle
> non-roman alphabets.  The two courses are very different, with Greek
> requiring you install the Greek language package right from the get go.
>

<~~ Wow Chinese is the most complex language in earth,
also it really one kinds of beauty human language ;-)
but i think there is not friendly course for Chinese.

luck for Leonard , this mailling-list standing many Chinese Leonard,
any Chinese question, can [OT] discuss here.

btw:
happy Chinese New Year for all Leonards



-- 
life is pathetic, go Pythonic! 人生苦短, Python当歌!
俺: http://zoomquiet.io
授: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/cn/
怒: 冗余不做,日子甭过!备份不做,十恶不赦!
KM keep growing environment culture which promoting organization learning!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Duolingo language courses

2018-02-04 Thread Matt Wilkie
thanks for this, it is timely!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Duolingo language courses

2018-02-04 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 at 10:56:11 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote:

Greek [requires] you install the Greek language package right from the get 
> go.
>

And now I know how to switch input methods 

 
:-) Installing the Chinese pack is next.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-30 Thread Matt Wilkie
> dict() is an obvious one, but because of Python's verbose dict syntax
> (foo['bar'] not foo.bar) it makes code harder to read​

I used attrdict for awhile, and liked it for what I was doing at the time,
https://github.com/bcj/AttrDict.There is Box,
https://github.com/cdgriffith/Box which has a sizable following and is
active. Though this Redit thread has a number of reasoned thoughts on why
the idea of Dotted Notation is a bad idea in large projects:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/2ew0y5/why_is_there_no_dotted_dict/
{shrug}

matt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-23 Thread Terry Brown
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:35:38 -0800
"Edward K. Ream"  wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Terry Brown 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
> > "Edward K. Ream"  wrote:
> >  
> > > ​Thanks for raising this topic.  I have been meaning to say a few
> > > deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.​  
> >
> > What don't you like about g.Bunch?
> 
> ​I don't like that it's a generic thingy.  I want objects to have a
> distinct, what should I say, personality or identity?
> thingy.__class__.__name__ should be informative and distinct from
> every other kind of object.

Hmm.  So certainly not (thing0, thing1, thing2).  And that's why I
marked this OT - I think that pattern's widespread, not just a Leo
thing.  It looks neat in example code:

  found, p, max_depth = findRecursive(...)

but examples of course don't need to worry about extension.

Maybe once at top of file:

  Obj = lambda name, **kwargs: type(name, (), dict(**kwargs))()

then

  return Obj('FindRecursive', found=True, p='P', max_depth=42)

That gives you an instance, not a class, but the attributes are
named and there's no temptation to make order / length dependent
assumptions, so I think that's ok.  It's really just g.Bunch with a
name.

More generally just returning a dict is a solution - anything except an
anonymous tuple.

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-23 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Terry Brown  wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
> "Edward K. Ream"  wrote:
>
> > ​Thanks for raising this topic.  I have been meaning to say a few
> > deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.​
>
> What don't you like about g.Bunch?
>

​I don't like that it's a generic thingy.  I want objects to have a
distinct, what should I say, personality or identity?
thingy.__class__.__name__ should be informative and distinct from every
other kind of object.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-23 Thread Terry Brown
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
"Edward K. Ream"  wrote:

> ​Thanks for raising this topic.  I have been meaning to say a few
> deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.​

What don't you like about g.Bunch?

g.Bunch was not what I was speaking against.  The pattern I'm
finding most awkward for extension is (thing0, thing1, thing2) - a
tuple (or list) where some kind of type with named attributes / keys
would be much more extensible.  The question is how to get that for the
least cost.

I agree the attr thing was kind of a red-herring, I just added that
before reading through it.

So for example for recursiveUNLFind()'s

  return found, maxdepth, maxp

even with the brevity attr might offer, defining a class just to return
something used in very few places seems onerous.  And I think named
tuples, while better, still risk order / length dependent assignment
and unpacking which breaks extensibility.

  return {'found': found, 'maxdepth': maxdepth, 'maxp': maxp}

or

  return dict(found=found, maxdepth=maxdepth, maxp=maxp)

is much more robust, and really the cost of using d['thing0'] instead
of d.thing0 (or just thing0 from tuple unpacking) isn't that great.  I
do prefer d.thing0 though.

I guess you could also have:

  thing0, thing1, thing2 = getkeys(result, 'thing0 thing1 thing2')

but if you're going to that g.Bunch or addict.Dict probably makes more
sense.

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-23 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Terry Brown  wrote:

Twice in the log links to nodes branch I had to work around tuples as
> stand-ins for light weight types.
>

​I agree.  And I don't think this is an off topic discussion.

I have almost always come to regret g.Bunch.  In my experience, any slight
initial extra work involved in defining a class almost always pays off
later.

Imo the attrs module is dubious.  ​The idea that __init__ and __repr__ are
odious seems far fetched.  In fact, I particularly *do* want to define
__repr__ myself.

Otoh, I have been seeing (and using) classes without ctors myself lately.

And some ivars/members can be set outside the ctor.

The design/coding pattern that can *not* be dismissed lightly is the
Jupyter traitlets module. The intriguing effect is that very few Jupyter
classes have ctor.  Leo won't ever use traitlets/traits because Leo has its
own notion of settings.

​Thanks for raising this topic.  I have been meaning to say a few
deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.​

​Edward​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: return do, not, use, this

2017-12-22 Thread Terry Brown
p.s. https://glyph.twistedmatrix.com/2016/08/attrs.html
is funny and points to
https://attrs.readthedocs.io/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-09-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:20 PM, john lunzer  wrote:

> On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 10:19:53 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>> I would like to learn more about web technologies.  I'll start by
>> replicating the appearance of Joe Orr's Leo Viewer page
>> .
>>
>
​To clarify, I simply meant that I would investigate getting a local copy
of the page to look like Joe Orr's page. It doesn't happen automatically.
Not sure why.
​

> Been thinking about this and a future web UI for Leo. With the dynamic and
> constantly changing nature of the web and web technologies it seems like
> the best investment would be to implement a web GUI front-end which is
> actually an abstraction layer to a messaging protocol which defines a
> generic (but based on Leo's needs) GUI API.
>

​Possible, I suppose, following the pattern used by Leo's core to implement
the body pane.  I'm not sure whether there is a read payoff, though.  I
would be inclined to do what JupyterLab does.
​

> I sort of got the idea from this article about the cost of
> X-to-Javascript transpilers .
> The long term view is that if your goal is putting your application into a
> browser you're better off learning and working in Javascript on the
> client/browser side.
>

​This is a (mostly) separate issue. However, I think Jupyter/JupyterLab
code in javascript, so again, if we follow their lead we would too.​


> But that doesn't mean we all need to switch to Javascript, just that the
> best tool for the job if you're interacting with an application inside a
> browser is Javascript. I think you can (and should) write your application
> logic on whatever platform you see fit and implement server/client
> communication.
>

​Right.  Leo must continue to have full support for python. And that
requires some web-based support for python, which is another can of worms.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-09-06 Thread john lunzer
On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 10:19:53 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:

> I would like to learn more about web technologies.  I'll start by 
> replicating the appearance of Joe Orr's Leo Viewer page 
> .
>

Been thinking about this and a future web UI for Leo. With the dynamic and 
constantly changing nature of the web and web technologies it seems like 
the best investment would be to implement a web GUI front-end which is 
actually an abstraction layer to a messaging protocol which defines a 
generic (but based on Leo's needs) GUI API. It would then be the 
responsibility of the "Leo Web Client" to implement the display logic and 
UI event logic and communicate to Leo using the defined API. Leo would 
require no knowledge of the client implementation.

I sort of got the idea from this article about the cost of X-to-Javascript 
transpilers . The long term view 
is that if your goal is putting your application into a browser you're 
better off learning and working in Javascript on the client/browser side. 
There is a good analogy about learning German if you live and work in 
Germany and about how much it would cost to hire a translator full time for 
an extend period. 

But that doesn't mean we all need to switch to Javascript, just that the 
best tool for the job if you're interacting with an application inside a 
browser is Javascript. I think you can (and should) write your application 
logic on whatever platform you see fit and implement server/client 
communication. 

I will make sure to say I have very little experience with web technologies 
or implement a system as described and I know almost no Javascript. Maybe 
it's a naive notion or maybe I'm making it overly complicated. I think 
these thoughts put into perspective what a huge undertaking it would be to 
write a web front-end. I would be interested to get some feedback. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Arjan  wrote:
>
>> Oh, also take a look at the superb videos at 3Blue1Brown
>> 
>> then!
>>
>
​Ok.  I've subscribed :-)

There's playlists like *Essence of linear algebra*, *Essence of calculus*,
>> and excellent items like Who cares about topology?
>> , all of them with great
>> visualizations...
>>
>
​Many thanks for turning me onto this series. It's inspiring.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Arjan  wrote:

> Oh, also take a look at the superb videos at 3Blue1Brown
>  then!
> There's playlists like *Essence of linear algebra*, *Essence of calculus*,
> and excellent items like Who cares about topology?
> , all of them with great
> visualizations...
>

​Thanks for these links. I've put them on the "fun things to study" list.

I would like to learn more about web technologies.  I'll start by
replicating the appearance of Joe Orr's Leo Viewer page
.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-24 Thread Arjan
Oh, also take a look at the superb videos at 3Blue1Brown 
 then! 
There's playlists like *Essence of linear algebra*, *Essence of calculus*, 
and excellent items like Who cares about topology? 
, all of them with great 
visualizations...

Cheers!

Arjan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-23 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:33:19 AM UTC-5, Satish Goda wrote:
>
> Great recommendation Edward. Appreciate sharing with us.
>
> I will start with this course today.
>

This course is a most hopeful development.  It should utterly destroy the 
myth that only "gifted" students (in any field) should be taught as if they 
matter.  And it should give us all hope that our own present ability level 
matters much less than our ability to study effectively.

I call your attention to this letter to the editor in the 18 August, 2017 
issue of Science magazine:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6352/654.3
"Helping less-prepared students excel".  To my mind, this is the best 
antidote to the world's bigots.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-22 Thread Satish Goda
Great recommendation Edward. Appreciate sharing with us.

I will start with this course today.

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 9:57:22 PM UTC+8, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> I ran across this free course in this New York Times article 
> .
>   
> The actual course is here 
> . After two days, I 
> am now on week three of four ;-).
>
> Like you, I have been fairly successful at learning. Learning is one of my 
> greatest pleasures. But now I see how little I actually knew about learning 
> and how inefficient I have been at studying.
>
> Imo, you are crazy if you don't take this course ;-) There is a ton of 
> great material here.
>
> I am now revisiting one of my greatest failures in life, a crash trying to 
> learn abstract algebra. Now I am studying Visual Group Theory 
> , along with the 
> techniques from the course. I am full of confidence now. Don't worry, it 
> only takes 25 minutes a day...
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: (Kinda) "Learning How to Learn" from Coursera

2017-08-14 Thread rengel
Thanks for the tip! I just started the course, because I don't want be 
crazy ;-).
Looks very promising...

Reinhard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-05-08 Thread Kent Tenney
Interesting, the other distro was reinventing install, poorly.

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 10:20:11 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> My Lenovo T460s now runs both Windows 10 and Ubuntu. I bought Windows 10
> on a stick, hehe, to ensure it would always be available.  Worth the price,
> imo.  It was actually easier to install Ubuntu than reinstall Windows 10.
> I had to download the Windows 10 networking drivers from another machine
> after installation.
>
> Note to Kent: The trick to getting *any* Linux distro to display properly
> on high-res machines is to set the magnification in the display settings to
> 1.5 or above. I was being unfair to the other distro, whose name I can't
> remember.  Otoh, the unnamed other distro did hose Windows, whereas Ubuntu
> did not.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-05-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 10:20:11 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:

My Lenovo T460s now runs both Windows 10 and Ubuntu. I bought Windows 10 on 
a stick, hehe, to ensure it would always be available.  Worth the price, 
imo.  It was actually easier to install Ubuntu than reinstall Windows 10.  
I had to download the Windows 10 networking drivers from another machine 
after installation.

Note to Kent: The trick to getting *any* Linux distro to display properly 
on high-res machines is to set the magnification in the display settings to 
1.5 or above. I was being unfair to the other distro, whose name I can't 
remember.  Otoh, the unnamed other distro did hose Windows, whereas Ubuntu 
did not.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-21 Thread john lunzer

>
>  I'm not convinced they actually fixed anything.
>

Funny, I say the same thing every time I get my car back from the shop.
 
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 11:20:11 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 11:22:23 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> > Alas, I won't have it with me at the sprint.
>
> Wow. I just got it back, two days after sending it to Atlanta.  I'll test 
> it for a few days before changing anything.  I'm not convinced they 
> actually fixed anything.  We shall see what the battery indicator says 
> tomorrow.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-19 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 11:22:23 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:

> Alas, I won't have it with me at the sprint.

Wow. I just got it back, two days after sending it to Atlanta.  I'll test 
it for a few days before changing anything.  I'm not convinced they 
actually fixed anything.  We shall see what the battery indicator says 
tomorrow.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-15 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:


> Can you give me the exact link to the download url you used for the Ubuntu
> image?
>

​Probably releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso

EKR

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-14 Thread Mike Hodson
USB3 I find has strange troubles booting .. This is often a BIOS issue.
USB2 is how I installed my T460s and my previous usb3 capable computers..

The battery issue..thats new to me..
I've never booted up Windows 10 for more than one time, just to see if it
_did_ boot..

That said, I've got the 256GB SSD :
*-disk
description: ATA Disk
product: TOSHIBA THNSFJ25
vendor: Toshiba
physical id: 0.0.0
bus info: scsi@1:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sda
version: 1102
serial: 76CS11GZTJ4V
size: 238GiB (256GB)

Left the windows EFI partition only on it, and then put LVM for the rest of
the space on the disk..

I'm really sorry this didn't work out well for you.. Can you give me the
exact link to the download url you used for the Ubuntu image?
I'm curious if I experience the exact same issue with my own..



On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:
>
>> Oh for the love of...
>> What died?!  I'm surprised as anything at this revelation
>>
>
> ​It was a cascading series of failures.  Imo, the machine was never
> right.  It ran very slowly out of the box.  Then the battery indicator got
> stuck at "28%, plugged in, not charging".  Recovering from the Windows 10
> recovery disk failed, making it impossible to boot.
>
> And oh yes, booting from a Ubuntu image failed with a USB 3 disk failed,
> although booting from a USB 2 drive ​did work.
>
> It's no big deal.  I'll have my old Windows 10 laptop with me in Ashland,
> and Terry and Kent are sure to have Linux laptops with them.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-14 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

> Oh for the love of...
> What died?!  I'm surprised as anything at this revelation
>

​It was a cascading series of failures.  Imo, the machine was never right.
It ran very slowly out of the box.  Then the battery indicator got stuck at
"28%, plugged in, not charging".  Recovering from the Windows 10 recovery
disk failed, making it impossible to boot.

And oh yes, booting from a Ubuntu image failed with a USB 3 disk failed,
although booting from a USB 2 drive ​did work.

It's no big deal.  I'll have my old Windows 10 laptop with me in Ashland,
and Terry and Kent are sure to have Linux laptops with them.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-14 Thread Mike Hodson
Oh for the love of...
What died?!  I'm surprised as anything at this revelation

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Edward K. Ream 
wrote:

> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:58:41 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> > Just ordered a t460s with backlit keyboard.
>
> Alas, I won't have it with me at the sprint.  The hardware has failed.
> It's going to Atlanta for repairs.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-14 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:58:41 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:

> Just ordered a t460s with backlit keyboard.

Alas, I won't have it with me at the sprint.  The hardware has failed. It's 
going to Atlanta for repairs.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

>
> Furthermore, I have found the 1920x1080 IPS non-touchscreen panel (matte
> display) in my laptop to have a bit of a strange gamma curve; It is spot-on
> with mid-tones, but the low/high ends are washed out.
>
> I just found the "BroadcastRGB" property in xrandr, and I must say this
> 100% fixes the ~15 or so black levels that are indistinguishable and the
> ~5-6 white levels also indistinguishable from eachother in the
> lagom.nl/lcd/ test pages
>
>
> ​​
> xrandr --output eDP1 --set "Broadcast RGB" "Limited 16:235"
>
> This works like a charm, and the difference in low-brightness color
> visibility is marked.  I highly suggest this tweak in a constantly
> applied-at-boot display script in your favorite window manager/desktop
> environment.
>

​Thanks for this tip. I've made a note of it.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-04 Thread Mike Hodson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> ​Just ordered a t460s with backlit keyboard. The video review I watched
> raved about the keyboard, which apparently is better than the dell keyboard.
>

Cool beans :)  I've had a good experience with this keyboard myself, being
one who even on nice Alps Sliders (1996 Alps MGL-Series) at home, still
smashes keys down to the point you hear the non-buckling-spring keys still
clack bottoming out.  If one complaint exists, its that the touchpad is too
far off-center to the left, and that my palm sometimes bumps it.. although
I think I've gotten through the touchpad settings well enough to enable
palm detection properly.  If you disable the clickpad and use just the
buttons / red nub, itd be a non-issue.  Maybe you also lift your palms more
than I do. *shrug*

Furthermore, I have found the 1920x1080 IPS non-touchscreen panel (matte
display) in my laptop to have a bit of a strange gamma curve; It is spot-on
with mid-tones, but the low/high ends are washed out.

I just found the "BroadcastRGB" property in xrandr, and I must say this
100% fixes the ~15 or so black levels that are indistinguishable and the
~5-6 white levels also indistinguishable from eachother in the lagom.nl/lcd/
test pages

 xrandr --output eDP1 --set "Broadcast RGB" "Limited 16:235"

This works like a charm, and the difference in low-brightness color
visibility is marked.  I highly suggest this tweak in a constantly
applied-at-boot display script in your favorite window manager/desktop
environment.

Setting the gamma level itself caused mid-tones to become too bright. This
limited range is far more useful :)

Hope you enjoy the T460s as much as I have the past 2+ weeks training and
working at my new job.

Mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-03 Thread jkn


On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 4:58:41 PM UTC+1, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Mike Hodson  > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Edward K. Ream > > wrote:
>>
>>> ​Hehe.  I see you have the essential "software": pizza, chips and pop.  
>>> It's a great recipe for hypertension, as I have found out.
>>>
>>> Alright then.  I'll order the ThinkPad t460s. Thanks for your advice.
>>>
>>
>> You're welcome!  I hope you like it as much as I do. The very nice key 
>> backlighting is one of the main selling points IMHO - I hate using my Asus 
>> laptop without such when I don't want to use the Thinkpad; Trying to 
>> totally separate work/play. 
>>
>
> ​Just ordered a t460s with backlit keyboard. The video review I watched 
> raved about the keyboard, which apparently is better than the dell keyboard.
>

That's interesting. All my laptops for the last 15 years have been 
Thinkpads, basically because (a) they have always been good to dual boot 
with Linux, and (b) the keyboards were miles ahead of any others. I am very 
fussy about keyboards and the Thinkpads are about the only ones I can get 
one with.

But the more recent thinkpads have moved to the 'chicklet' style of 
keyboard, and some of the reviews I saw of the T460s characterised the 
keyboard feel as 'stiff', which concerned me a bit. Perhaps the feel has 
changed less that I feared, and they are comparing it with the somewhat 
squishy (to me) feel of Dell keyboards.

I'm not particularly in the market at the moment but seems like I should 
try something like a T460 when the time comes.

Let us know how you get on with it.

Jon N

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-03 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Edward K. Ream 
> wrote:
>
>> ​Hehe.  I see you have the essential "software": pizza, chips and pop.
>> It's a great recipe for hypertension, as I have found out.
>>
>> Alright then.  I'll order the ThinkPad t460s. Thanks for your advice.
>>
>
> You're welcome!  I hope you like it as much as I do. The very nice key
> backlighting is one of the main selling points IMHO - I hate using my Asus
> laptop without such when I don't want to use the Thinkpad; Trying to
> totally separate work/play.
>

​Just ordered a t460s with backlit keyboard. The video review I watched
raved about the keyboard, which apparently is better than the dell keyboard.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Chris George  wrote:

> https://www.slant.co/topics/1184/~laptops-for-linux
>
> I have heard good things about the Dell.
>

​Thanks.  It does look good.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Chris George
https://www.slant.co/topics/1184/~laptops-for-linux

I have heard good things about the Dell.

Chris

On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Terry Brown  wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 05:46:28 -0400
> Mike Hodson  wrote:
>
> > And, when the food is provided free from the office, I tend to eat
> > it.
>
> For optimum performance you should really be drinking beer or something
> and aiming for the Ballmer Peak:
>
> https://xkcd.com/323/
>
> Cheers -Terry
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Terry Brown
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 05:46:28 -0400
Mike Hodson  wrote:

> And, when the food is provided free from the office, I tend to eat
> it.

For optimum performance you should really be drinking beer or something
and aiming for the Ballmer Peak:

https://xkcd.com/323/

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Mike Hodson
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> ​Hehe.  I see you have the essential "software": pizza, chips and pop.
> It's a great recipe for hypertension, as I have found out.
>
> Alright then.  I'll order the ThinkPad t460s. Thanks for your advice.
>

You're welcome!  I hope you like it as much as I do. The very nice key
backlighting is one of the main selling points IMHO - I hate using my Asus
laptop without such when I don't want to use the Thinkpad; Trying to
totally separate work/play.

And, when the food is provided free from the office, I tend to eat
it..especially when I am out of Colorado, in Virginia, training for this
new position, and have to afford food/ubering for 3 weeks until a paycheck
(after which a good chunk is reimbursed...but not pre-imbursed..) i take
all the free food I can get.

Mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

> Indeed, it runs Sabayon right now.
>

​Hehe.  I see you have the essential "software": pizza, chips and pop.
It's a great recipe for hypertension, as I have found out.

Alright then.  I'll order the ThinkPad t460s. Thanks for your advice.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Mike Hodson
Indeed, it runs Sabayon right now.
But a lot of others in the office, with similar hardware, are using Ubuntu,
Mint, and Fedora and others to great success.
The place I'm working now (InMotion Hosting) is almost all Linux from Tier
2 onward; a few Macs. Only the Tier 1 group uses Windows for domain access
and locking down the systems...

As long as the boot media isn't stupid (Sabayon Daily I'm looking at you)
it should work fine. I went with last-month's Sabayon install media and it
worked perfectly first-try.

Hope this gives you some more assurance :)

Mike



On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:
>
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> I've got word back from my friend that the Gazelle is most likely
>> presently being updated to the 7th Generation Core processors; its a
>> Clevo-oem'd system, and the present KabyLake upstream model is out, so its
>> probably another month or 2 of driver work for Ubuntu on it.  If you need
>> something _now_ the 14.1 model, or one of the Thinkpad range are still my
>> recommendations.
>>
>
> ​I've heard, perhaps incorrectly, that it's difficult to install Linux on
> recent Windows laptops. Do you have Linux installed on your ThinkPad t460s?​
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-02 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

> Hi Edward,
>
> I've got word back from my friend that the Gazelle is most likely
> presently being updated to the 7th Generation Core processors; its a
> Clevo-oem'd system, and the present KabyLake upstream model is out, so its
> probably another month or 2 of driver work for Ubuntu on it.  If you need
> something _now_ the 14.1 model, or one of the Thinkpad range are still my
> recommendations.
>

​I've heard, perhaps incorrectly, that it's difficult to install Linux on
recent Windows laptops. Do you have Linux installed on your ThinkPad t460s?​

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-01 Thread Mike Hodson
Hi Edward,

I've got word back from my friend that the Gazelle is most likely presently
being updated to the 7th Generation Core processors; its a Clevo-oem'd
system, and the present KabyLake upstream model is out, so its probably
another month or 2 of driver work for Ubuntu on it.  If you need something
_now_ the 14.1 model, or one of the Thinkpad range are still my
recommendations.

Mike


On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> ​
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:
>
>> Hi Edward I would recommend a system76 laptop they've got lots of
>> different ones to meet your price point as well as your requirements for
>> quietness I could even put you in touch with someone who worked on them
>> specifically like actually worked for the company so he could attest to
>> their quietness or loudness.
>>
>
> ​A quiet 15" model would be just right.  The Gazelle is listed as not
> available on their web site.  Could you ask you friend what would be good?
> Thanks.
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-01 Thread Edward K. Ream
​
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

> Hi Edward I would recommend a system76 laptop they've got lots of
> different ones to meet your price point as well as your requirements for
> quietness I could even put you in touch with someone who worked on them
> specifically like actually worked for the company so he could attest to
> their quietness or loudness.
>

​A quiet 15" model would be just right.  The Gazelle is listed as not
available on their web site.  Could you ask you friend what would be good?
Thanks.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-01 Thread Miles Fidelman
Well, personally, I recommend Mac laptops - tremendous hardware, and 
they're BSD unix underneath.  And it's easy enough to run pretty much 
any Linux or BSD distro under a hypervisor - at near native speed.


I typically have Parallels running, with a Windows VM running (for 
Quicken and Visio), keep a couple of terminal windows open running BSD 
stuff, and when I'm doing development, I might have a couple of Linux or 
BSD, or even MacOS VMs running (who wants to risk polluting one's 
primary computer with experimental code). Meanwhile, I'm typically 
running Office, a browser, and email under MacOS.


A fully loaded MacBook costs a little more - but they last a long time 
and provide the best of all worlds.  (And AppleCare support is great, 
particularly when you need to replace a hard drive.  My new box has a 
1TB SSD - so I don't expect to need a drive replacement anytime soon - 
and it just screems.)





On Apr 1, 2017 2:41 PM, "Edward K. Ream" mailto:edream...@gmail.com>> wrote:

My Windows laptop is showing its age.  I'd like to have a
Linux laptop for the Ashland sprint.

Any suggestions for a relatively powerful /quiet/ Ubuntu laptop?

Edward



--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   Yogi Berra

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-01 Thread Chris George
I recently bought a lease return Lenovo T430 Thinkpad. Everything "just
works" and the price was right. ($399 CDN) Very quiet.

Chris

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Mike Hodson  wrote:

> Hi Edward I would recommend a system76 laptop they've got lots of
> different ones to meet your price point as well as your requirements for
> quietness I could even put you in touch with someone who worked on them
> specifically like actually worked for the company so he could attest to
> their quietness or loudness.
>
> Otherwise you have pretty much a crapshoot of whether or not it's loud.
>  you could always go to the store to verify; but whether or not Linux works
> on it properly, is another good question, some of them I found are okay,
> others not so much.
>
> My current daily driver laptop is a Toshiba 12.5 inch foldable touchscreen
> 4k laptop but it has the most horrible vacuum cleaner of a fan ; it works
> well though with Linux as many of the Skylake ones recently seem to.
>
> Finally there's always the Lenovo ThinkPad models the t460s specifically
> is actually a very nice one, I've been using it for work and it is actually
> extremely quiet extremely lightweight 14.1 inch full HD no touch screen but
> the laptop is really solid.
>
> Hope this helps and if any weird spelling errors exist that's because I'm
> trying Google Voice typing I was I take a walk around Virginia Beach.
>
> Have a nice day Edward!
>
> Mike
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 2:41 PM, "Edward K. Ream"  wrote:
>
>> My Windows laptop is showing its age.  I'd like to have a Linux laptop
>> for the Ashland sprint.
>>
>> Any suggestions for a relatively powerful *quiet* Ubuntu laptop?
>>
>> Edward
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "leo-editor" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Time for a Linux laptop

2017-04-01 Thread Mike Hodson
Hi Edward I would recommend a system76 laptop they've got lots of different
ones to meet your price point as well as your requirements for quietness I
could even put you in touch with someone who worked on them specifically
like actually worked for the company so he could attest to their quietness
or loudness.

Otherwise you have pretty much a crapshoot of whether or not it's loud.
 you could always go to the store to verify; but whether or not Linux works
on it properly, is another good question, some of them I found are okay,
others not so much.

My current daily driver laptop is a Toshiba 12.5 inch foldable touchscreen
4k laptop but it has the most horrible vacuum cleaner of a fan ; it works
well though with Linux as many of the Skylake ones recently seem to.

Finally there's always the Lenovo ThinkPad models the t460s specifically is
actually a very nice one, I've been using it for work and it is actually
extremely quiet extremely lightweight 14.1 inch full HD no touch screen but
the laptop is really solid.

Hope this helps and if any weird spelling errors exist that's because I'm
trying Google Voice typing I was I take a walk around Virginia Beach.

Have a nice day Edward!

Mike

On Apr 1, 2017 2:41 PM, "Edward K. Ream"  wrote:

> My Windows laptop is showing its age.  I'd like to have a Linux laptop for
> the Ashland sprint.
>
> Any suggestions for a relatively powerful *quiet* Ubuntu laptop?
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [OT-GAOTD] Aml Pages 9.78 - Aml Pages keeps all your information in a form of tree.

2017-02-28 Thread ne1uno
I should have mentioned, there is a portable versions available
and, also, a menu item to make a portable version.
I assume this just creates local ini file or whatever else it needs
pulled from far flung directories 
nobody but the program would know how to find.

I often look for and would try or use a portable version.
these days, many will want to know if there is an app version.
ePIM does have one, not sure about AML Pages.
there is a python android app creator
has anyone tried to build Leo for phone or tablet?

just tried the mobile version of groups on desktop
so much quicker and less busy, but doesn't seem to have a reply button.

On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 7:34:05 PM UTC-5, ne1uno wrote:
>
> https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/aml-pages-9-78/
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [OT-GAOTD] Aml Pages 9.78 - Aml Pages keeps all your information in a form of tree.

2017-02-28 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, ne1uno  wrote:

​Interesting graphics.  Maybe Leo's promotional materials could look
something like that.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-21 Thread Largo84
Our model railroad club uses several of these for a variety of useful 
purposes. I haven't yet worked with them personally to program them, but 
I'm really intrigued by what we've been able to do with them. For example, 
we use one to emulate the master command stations that send digital signals 
to the tracks to control the locomotives on the layout. We're also building 
a master signaling control system using another one. They're pretty cool!

Rob...

On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 10:02:44 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened.  Anyone 
> know a real use for it?
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-21 Thread gatesphere

On 1/21/2017 5:57 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Edward K. Ream > wrote:


I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened. 
Anyone know a real use for it?



​Thanks for the replies.  My concern is that the internet of things 
has security holes.  For example, it's possible to use 
computer-controlled light bulbs to hack into the system that is 
controlling them.


EKR
--
Well, Raspberry Pis run Linux (the official distro is a Debian flavor) 
that you install on the SD card and have full control of, so it's as 
secure as any other Linux machine in your home network :) Just shut down 
any services you're not using and make sure your router's firewall is 
set up properly and you're golden.


-->Jake

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-21 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 04:57:24 -0600
"Edward K. Ream"  wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Edward K. Ream 
> wrote:
> 
> > I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened.
> > Anyone know a real use for it?
> >  
> 
> ​Thanks for the replies.  My concern is that the internet of things
> has security holes.  For example, it's possible to use
> computer-controlled light bulbs to hack into the system that is
> controlling them.

A valid concern, but Pis aren't really "things" in that sense, they're
little computers running Linux, everything you know about securing such
systems, and the resources put in to keeping Linux secure, apply here
too.  For example I run fail2ban on mine.

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-21 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened.  Anyone
> know a real use for it?
>

​Thanks for the replies.  My concern is that the internet of things has
security holes.  For example, it's possible to use computer-controlled
light bulbs to hack into the system that is controlling them.

EKR

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-20 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:02:43 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream"  wrote:

> I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened.
> Anyone know a real use for it?
> 
> Edward

I have two, I was using one as a media player on the TV, until the TV
died and got replaced with a smarter one.  The other I use as an
always on server for remote logins and other light weight web things.

The 3's are quite powerful.  You can deploy GitLab on them, for example.

I also used one in a piece of PVC pipe with a radio and GPS receiver
to make a floating current mapper for river and lake research,
although I think these https://www.adafruit.com/product/2390 are a
better fit for that as they use less power.

Cheers -Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: What's a raspberry pi good for?

2017-01-20 Thread Jacob Peck
I have several laying about my apartment, they're quite capable little 
devices :)


- My personal webserver is a first generation RasPi 1 Model B (with the 
256MB chip, before they changed).  It's been working just fine for 2-3 
years now, no issues at all!
- I have one hooked up to my TV running RetroPie with all sorts of old 
video games loaded on to it (and I built a few for friends as gifts this 
Christmas).
- I have one I'm working on to read MIDI files off of a floppy disk and 
play them through my home stereo system (because I can, it seemed like a 
neat project).
- I was going to have one as a home music server hooked up to my stereo, 
but I lucked into a beefier ultra-tiny PC instead.  But plenty of people 
use them for this purpose.
- I've been thinking of throwing a couple into my music gear kit -- for 
use as a MIDI bridge, or a software defined synthesizer, etc. -- They're 
not too much more expensive than an Arduino, and they have on-board 
audio and USB, and a much faster processor -- and I could code them in 
Python instead of C.  But this is theory for me so far.


The Raspberry Pi foundation was pushing Python as their language of 
choice back when they first came about, between my original Model B and 
Leo, that's why I got into Python in the first place.


-->Jake

On 1/20/2017 10:02 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I was given a raspberry pi 3 for Christmas.  It's still unopened.  
Anyone know a real use for it?


Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com 
.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT: Org-mode + IPython interoperability

2015-06-10 Thread john lunzer
Didn't know about Pharo, it's an interesting looking language!

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 9:56:06 AM UTC-4, Offray Vladimir Luna 
Cárdenas wrote:
>
>  Thank Jacob for sharing this link. Is enriching to see this diversity of 
> approaches to interactive documentation. I have been away of the list 
> lately because I'm trying to build my own conciliation of IPython and Leo 
> features for interactive documentation, including a outline "emerging" 
> structure for documents ala Leo with interactive code nodes, with syntax 
> highlighting, code completion, embedded interactive graphics, ala IPython. 
> Is called Grafoscopio[1] and is done using several technologies I had 
> talked in this list like Pharo Smalltalk[2] and fossil[3] and a recently 
> discovered (by myself) light data serialization format called STON[4], 
> which, for me, is kind of YAML[5] in Smalltalk. Still is pretty alpha code. 
> Here is a screenshot:
>
>
>
>
> [1] http://mutabit.com/grafoscopio/
> [2] http://pharo.org/
> [3] http://fossil-scm.org/
> [4] https://github.com/svenvc/ston/blob/master/ston-paper.md
> [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML
>
> Grafoscopio has a more narrow reach that Leo: interactive documentation, 
> but the experience of writing it in Pharo Smalltalk has been really fluid, 
> more that anything that I have tried before (including Leo). Leo still is 
> one of my favorite tools and the technology and the community around it are 
> a source of inspiration.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Offray
>
> On 09/06/15 10:29, Jacob Peck wrote:
>  
> https://github.com/gregsexton/ob-ipython 
>
> Perhaps someone will be interested in this? 
>
>  
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  1   2   3   >