Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Tim Burress tim at variosecure.net writes: On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 For what it's worth, I ran into the same problem but found that it was just a typographical error on the last line of the configure command, where --with-mpfr-lib is defined. Since it's the last line you may have truncated it during the cut/paste or something. Thanks for the help! Turned out to be a typo just as you said. (Force of habit - from working with PHP - made me put an s on the end of include in the path specification) once corrected, the compile went smoothly. Thanks again! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:12:42AM +0200, Tobias Gasser wrote: recently i had intermittent failures on both xulrunner and firefox where i build with -jX since a very long time. with version 15.0 the build fails at about half of the builds on my system. giving -j1 runs fine. i can use 8 cores in the mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS=-j8 but NOT in the MAKEFLAGS or the make-commandline! I noticed (a month or so ago) that fedora use a maximum of -j4 for xulrunner (didn't check firefox) - I've only got a max of 4 cores, so I didn't pay any attention to that. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 For what it's worth, I ran into the same problem but found that it was just a typographical error on the last line of the configure command, where --with-mpfr-lib is defined. Since it's the last line you may have truncated it during the cut/paste or something. One thing is just to try find /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build -name 'libmpfr*' -print and see if that gives you anything. If so, check to see if the path is what you have as the value for --with-mpfr-lib. Another thing you can do is look at /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc/config.log. Search for libmpfr not found and if you look above that a page or two you'll see the gcc command that's testing for libmpfr. It's trying to compile a program called conftest. See if the paths given in the -L directives there match what you gave for --with-mpfr-lib. You can even extract the code for conftest.c (it's down below the error message if I remember right) and try to build it yourself in /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc/ using the gcc command line from config.log. Somewhere in the process you should see something that gives you a clue! Tim Thanks Tim, those tips will be really useful for anybody who encounters that problem again. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/07/2012 01:12 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote: Baho Utot schrieb: I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me. so you just had very very much luck on your way... there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds. yes i know that, but I do not attribute my success using -j4 -j8 as luck as my builds are constent over many complete runs and four different machines two x86_64 and two i686 builds. As I am currently developing my build ayatem I start from a clean position and build/rebuild 4 to six times on each box both i686 and x86_64 before I make a decision upon it. whenever i run into a problem, i just restart the package with -j1 which often solved the problem magically in the past... Yes I will drop down to -j1 if necessary. i'm used to set -jX to the number of cores i have (currently -j8 on my i7) globally which speeds up the build-time significally. my system might be a little special, as i use a SSD and the working diretory for the builds is a tmpfs as i have 16g of ram available. thus disk-io is very very very fast. from the base LFS i have to overwrite -j8 for make grub make groff make / test udev test tar test patch test binutils For the above list I only had trouble with the systemd version of udev. All the udev versions used in LFS-6.8 to 7.1 worked with -j4 without error. Dropping to -j1 in the build phase fixed it. But I am investigating it recently i had intermittent failures on both xulrunner and firefox where i build with -jX since a very long time. with version 15.0 the build fails at about half of the builds on my system. giving -j1 runs fine. i can use 8 cores in the mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS=-j8 but NOT in the MAKEFLAGS or the make-commandline! I just set MAKEFLAGS and if I get an error I just add make -j1 to the build script for that package. I have not built BLFS so I may be in for some trouble? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 For what it's worth, I ran into the same problem but found that it was just a typographical error on the last line of the configure command, where --with-mpfr-lib is defined. Since it's the last line you may have truncated it during the cut/paste or something. One thing is just to try find /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build -name 'libmpfr*' -print and see if that gives you anything. If so, check to see if the path is what you have as the value for --with-mpfr-lib. Another thing you can do is look at /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc/config.log. Search for libmpfr not found and if you look above that a page or two you'll see the gcc command that's testing for libmpfr. It's trying to compile a program called conftest. See if the paths given in the -L directives there match what you gave for --with-mpfr-lib. You can even extract the code for conftest.c (it's down below the error message if I remember right) and try to build it yourself in /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc/ using the gcc command line from config.log. Somewhere in the process you should see something that gives you a clue! Tim -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Baho Utot schrieb: I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me. so you just had very very much luck on your way... there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds. whenever i run into a problem, i just restart the package with -j1 which often solved the problem magically in the past... i'm used to set -jX to the number of cores i have (currently -j8 on my i7) globally which speeds up the build-time significally. my system might be a little special, as i use a SSD and the working diretory for the builds is a tmpfs as i have 16g of ram available. thus disk-io is very very very fast. from the base LFS i have to overwrite -j8 for make grub make groff make / test udev test tar test patch test binutils as i don't check the makeflag on each new version, probably one or another package meanwile would rund fine with -j8. for python make and test run fine with -j8, but install requires -j1 (not always, but on rary occasions it fails as files are tried to be installed into a directory not yet build by another thread) recently i had intermittent failures on both xulrunner and firefox where i build with -jX since a very long time. with version 15.0 the build fails at about half of the builds on my system. giving -j1 runs fine. i can use 8 cores in the mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS=-j8 but NOT in the MAKEFLAGS or the make-commandline! tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder snip I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard During pass 1, GCC requires the GMP, MPC and MPFR libraries, but we don't want GCC to get these libraries from the host. GCC searches for the libraries either via the regular search paths *or* inside it's own source tree. We install a temporary copy inside the GCC source tree to take advantage of this, and thus allow GCC to not be contaminated with host libraries During pass 2, we are in a protected chroot environment, so we are no longer concerned about the host. So other programs in pass 2 can take advantage of the GMP, MPC and MPFR libraries later in the build, we install them before GCC instead of in the source tree. -- -- - Steve Crosby Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, I'm wondering if there may be a race condition affecting the GCC build with GMP, MPC, and MPFR building inside the GCC directory at the same time. I have no proof for this; it's just a hypothesis, but I was wondering what others may think. There is *definitely* a problem where the GCC build sometimes fails at the same point each time (checking for MPFR), and then builds OK on a random attempt. I'm not aware of the problem ever occurring on the final build of GCC where GMP, MPC, and MPFR are built outside the GCC directory. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote: Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, Im wondering if there may be a race condition affecting the GCC build with GMP, MPC, and MPFR building inside the GCC directory at the same time. I have no proof for this; its just a hypothesis, but I was wondering what others may think. There is *definitely* a problem where the GCC build sometimes fails at the same point each time (checking for MPFR), and then builds OK on a random attempt. Im not aware of the problem ever occurring on the final build of GCC where GMP, MPC, and MPFR are built outside the GCC directory. Richard I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and done many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, I would suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, as was suggested. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote: Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). Picking up on what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, Im wondering if there may be a race condition affecting the GCC build with GMP, MPC, and MPFR building inside the GCC directory at the same time. I have no proof for this; its just a hypothesis, but I was wondering what others may think. There is *definitely* a problem where the GCC build sometimes fails at the same point each time (checking for MPFR), and then builds OK on a random attempt. Im not aware of the problem ever occurring on the final build of GCC where GMP, MPC, and MPFR are built outside the GCC directory. Richard I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and done many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, I would suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, as was suggested. -- Jasmine Iwanek I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me. Maybe those that do have a problem are all using a scripted build vs those that don't have a scripted build? Suggesting that it may be only showing up in scripted builds? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote: On 09/05/2012 08:17 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and done many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, I would suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, as was suggested. -- Jasmine Iwanek I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me. Maybe those that do have a problem are all using a scripted build vs those that don't have a scripted build? Suggesting that it may be only showing up in scripted builds? Could well be the case, aye, but that kind of backs the original point, as far as I can tell, we should not be having to support people who didn't follow the book instructions (or as was pointed out by bruce) didn't look before they leaped, after all, if you're unable to find the time to do even one build by hand, what hope do you have to find the time to properly script your builds and debug said scripts? -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: On 2012-09-05 13:34, Baho Utot wrote: [putolin] I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me. Maybe those that do have a problem are all using a scripted build vs those that don't have a scripted build? Suggesting that it may be only showing up in scripted builds? Could well be the case, aye, but that kind of backs the original point, as far as I can tell, we should not be having to support people who didn't follow the book instructions (or as was pointed out by bruce) didn't look before they leaped, after all, if you're unable to find the time to do even one build by hand, what hope do you have to find the time to properly script your builds and debug said scripts? Leaping before looking is what I do well and it has taught me a great deal. Following a path by others may be a very good guide, but to truly learn requires ones to deviate from the beaten path and strike out on your own. How else can you create a truly giant mess in which to learn from? Like taking LFS and adding pacman packager. By scripting your builds you learn a great deal about linux and admin. One also has the opportunity to learn some debugging skills. Scripted builds also give one repeatability once they are working. I have scripted my LFS builds and incorporating the pacman package manager. I started with 6.8 and I am currently completing 7.2. I did so that I can confirm that my scripts produce a proper build, i.e. it was tested over the four builds which gave me the opportunity to weed out non apparent errors. I then took those same packages produced by the build and installed them onto 5 other machines so I could check to see if the build was generic for the i686 and x86_64 platforms. I now have a solid platform in which to create a distribution system ( as well building BLFS ) as for the computers under my care. I have learned many things. I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who knows by some not following the book new things are learned? Helping others is always good. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 15:34, Baho Utot wrote: On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: Leaping before looking is what I do well and it has taught me a great deal. Following a path by others may be a very good guide, but to truly learn requires ones to deviate from the beaten path and strike out on your own. How else can you create a truly giant mess in which to learn from? Like taking LFS and adding pacman packager. By scripting your builds you learn a great deal about linux and admin. One also has the opportunity to learn some debugging skills. Scripted builds also give one repeatability once they are working. I have scripted my LFS builds and incorporating the pacman package manager. I started with 6.8 and I am currently completing 7.2. I did so that I can confirm that my scripts produce a proper build, i.e. it was tested over the four builds which gave me the opportunity to weed out non apparent errors. I then took those same packages produced by the build and installed them onto 5 other machines so I could check to see if the build was generic for the i686 and x86_64 platforms. I now have a solid platform in which to create a distribution system ( as well building BLFS ) as for the computers under my care. I have learned many things. I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who knows by some not following the book new things are learned? Helping others is always good. Oh, I agree with you fully, don't get me wrong, but people should be starting at the start, not the end. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 10:43, Richard Melville wrote: Thanks for the reply Steve ( and Eleanor earlier). ?Picking up on what Bruce said about the possibility of race conditions relating to building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, Im wondering if there may be a race condition affecting the GCC build with GMP, MPC, and MPFR building inside the GCC directory at the same time. ?I have no proof for this; its just a hypothesis, but I was wondering what others may think. ?There is *definitely* a problem where the GCC build sometimes fails at the same point each time (checking for MPFR), and then builds OK on a random attempt. ?Im not aware of the problem ever occurring on the final build of GCC where GMP, MPC, and MPFR are built outside the GCC directory. Richard I've been bashing away at building LFS for a VERY long time, and done many many builds of 7.2, this problem has not hit me once, Well aren't you the lucky one. If you took the trouble to look back over the mailing list you would see that a number of people have experienced the error. I would suggest you stop building GCC with MAKEFLAGS set to -j 1, as was suggested. -- Jasmine Iwanek If you spent less time hectoring people and more time reading the posts you would know that I'm quite aware of the issues surrounding the setting of MAKEFLAGS. What is your problem? Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 16:37, Richard Melville wrote: Who are you referring to here? You make an awful lot of assumptions. Richard And yet you tell me that I should try reading all the posts. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 15:34, Baho Utot wrote: On 09/05/2012 09:55 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: Leaping before looking is what I do well and it has taught me a great deal. Following a path by others may be a very good guide, but to truly learn requires ones to deviate from the beaten path and strike out on your own. How else can you create a truly giant mess in which to learn from? Like taking LFS and adding pacman packager. By scripting your builds you learn a great deal about linux and admin. One also has the opportunity to learn some debugging skills. Scripted builds also give one repeatability once they are working. I have scripted my LFS builds and incorporating the pacman package manager. I started with 6.8 and I am currently completing 7.2. I did so that I can confirm that my scripts produce a proper build, i.e. it was tested over the four builds which gave me the opportunity to weed out non apparent errors. I then took those same packages produced by the build and installed them onto 5 other machines so I could check to see if the build was generic for the i686 and x86_64 platforms. I now have a solid platform in which to create a distribution system ( as well building BLFS ) as for the computers under my care. I have learned many things. I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who knows by some not following the book new things are learned? Helping others is always good. Oh, I agree with you fully, don't get me wrong, but people should be starting at the start, not the end. -- Jasmine Iwanek What is that supposed to mean? Really, if you have nothing useful to say then don't say anything. Thanks for your positive post Baho. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 16:46, Richard Melville wrote: What is that supposed to mean? Really, if you have nothing useful to say then dont say anything. Thanks for your positive post Baho. Richard This is lfs-support, not Whine-like-a-child-because-someone-gave-their-insight-and-opinion-and-you-dont-like-it, Kindly keep the discussion on topic. As you say though, If you have nothing useful to say then don't say anything. Don't bother replying, mail filters are now set to direct your messages to /dev/null. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/5/2012 11:20 AM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: On 2012-09-05 16:46, Richard Melville wrote: What is that supposed to mean? Really, if you have nothing useful to say then dont say anything. Thanks for your positive post Baho. Richard This is lfs-support, not Whine-like-a-child-because-someone-gave-their-insight-and-opinion-and-you-dont-like-it, Kindly keep the discussion on topic. As you say though, If you have nothing useful to say then don't say anything. Don't bother replying, mail filters are now set to direct your messages to /dev/null. -- Jasmine Iwanek What he's complaining about is your attitude when replying. Not only are you assuming that everyone knows what you're talking about, you think they're going to follow it without question. Now, while I currently lean towards liking you, if your attitude in your messages continues, you'll be ignored by my filters. Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Baho Utot wrote: I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who knows by some not following the book new things are learned? I don't have problem with users not following the book. It's just that sometimes an attitude comes across and that makes it more difficult to want to help. We always suggest a manual build for first time users. Knowing how it is supposed to work is really useful before making custom changes. It is 'Your distro, your rules.' IMO, building twice, the first time by the book without customization/scripts, really will save time in the long run. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-05 19:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who knows by some not following the book new things are learned? I don't have problem with users not following the book. It's just that sometimes an attitude comes across and that makes it more difficult to want to help. We always suggest a manual build for first time users. Knowing how it is supposed to work is really useful before making custom changes. It is 'Your distro, your rules.' IMO, building twice, the first time by the book without customization/scripts, really will save time in the long run. -- Bruce Thank you Bruce, You worded that far better than I had. (: -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 02:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I still think that helping others even if they have failed to follow the
book is a worthy goal as it shows where the book my be improved. Who
knows by some not following the book new things are learned?
I don't have problem with users not following the book. It's just that
sometimes an attitude comes across and that makes it more difficult to
want to help.
We always suggest a manual build for first time users. Knowing how it
is supposed to work is really useful before making custom changes. It
is 'Your distro, your rules.'
How ever if one has some previous experience in shell scripts the
scripting build made be less problematic as cut and paste will reduce
errors. You can run/modify the script until you get it correct.
Correcting each error as you go until you arrive at a good build. This
is what I did. Using DESTDIR helps here as you get n number of do overs ;)
One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it
correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual
way is a great problem.
IMO, building twice, the first time by the book without
customization/scripts, really will save time in the long run.
I generally agree here but a simple script like this will catch a lot of
simple errors. If you do make an error, by examining you script for
that package you could see very easy where you made the error.
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit# exit if error
set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
set +h# disable hashall
shopt -s -o pipefail
pkgname=package name
pkgver=package version
srcname=${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
srcdir=${pkgname}-${pkgver}
startdir=$(pwd)
function unpack() {
tar xf ${srcname}
}
function clean() {
rm -rf ${srcdir}
}
function build() {
# cut and paste here from the book
./configure --prefix=/tools
make
make -j1 install
}
clean;unpack;pushd ${srcdir};build;popd;clean
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote: One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual way is a great problem. Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve typing? I don't use scripts to build LFS (always manual for me :) ), but I do know how to copy+paste the commands into the console and hit Enter. Then it's the good old-fashioned My code's compiling excuse at work. :) Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Baho Utot wrote:
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit# exit if error
set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
set +h# disable hashall
shopt -s -o pipefail
pkgname=package name
pkgver=package version
srcname=${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
srcdir=${pkgname}-${pkgver}
startdir=$(pwd)
function unpack() {
tar xf ${srcname}
}
function clean() {
rm -rf ${srcdir}
}
function build() {
# cut and paste here from the book
./configure --prefix=/tools
make
make -j1 install
}
clean;unpack;pushd ${srcdir};build;popd;clean
As a minimum, I'd add after ./configure and the first make.
There's a little more that can go wrong too. The directory name is not
always ${srcdir}, so each package needs some customization.
I still feel that for most people, a manual build is useful. For an
experienced user like yourself, perhaps not so much.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 03:47 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote: One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual way is a great problem. Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve typing? I don't use scripts to build LFS (always manual for me :) ), but I do know how to copy+paste the commands into the console and hit Enter. Then it's the good old-fashioned My code's compiling excuse at work. :) Elly Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script then run it instead of the tty? What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have lost that info. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/5/2012 2:54 PM, Baho Utot wrote: On 09/05/2012 03:47 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/5/2012 2:35 PM, Baho Utot wrote: One can not assume that if you do it manually that you will do it correctly every time. What if your some what dyslexic? Then the manual way is a great problem. Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve typing? I don't use scripts to build LFS (always manual for me :) ), but I do know how to copy+paste the commands into the console and hit Enter. Then it's the good old-fashioned My code's compiling excuse at work. :) Elly Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script then run it instead of the tty? What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have lost that info. ... I should probably have added that if it breaks while compiling, I throw the directories out and try again. Of course, I've lost many, many builds that way, but I still have fun with it. :) Just remember folks, No one likes a smart ass. Maybe I should get another email as something like that just for the heck of it... Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 03:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit# exit if error
set -o nounset# exit if variable not initalized
set +h# disable hashall
shopt -s -o pipefail
pkgname=package name
pkgver=package version
srcname=${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
srcdir=${pkgname}-${pkgver}
startdir=$(pwd)
function unpack() {
tar xf ${srcname}
}
function clean() {
rm -rf ${srcdir}
}
function build() {
# cut and paste here from the book
./configure --prefix=/tools
make
make -j1 install
}
clean;unpack;pushd ${srcdir};build;popd;clean
As a minimum, I'd add after ./configure and the first make.
There's a little more that can go wrong too. The directory name is not
always ${srcdir}, so each package needs some customization.
I still feel that for most people, a manual build is useful. For an
experienced user like yourself, perhaps not so much.
-- Bruce
I have it wrapped in a calling script that does a
trap 'echo Tool chain build failed...;touch /tools/FAILURE;exit 1' ERR
so if something fails this will catch it and won't let it continue.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script then run it instead of the tty? What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have lost that info. history | less When I'm editing, particularly in BLFS, or when I'm trying to fix a new build failure, I use that a lot. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Have you ever thought that the manual way does not have to involve typing? I don't use scripts to build LFS (always manual for me :) ), but I do know how to copy+paste the commands into the console and hit Enter. Elly Yes and us Windows people can allways download putty.exe and instal Open SSH on the host. Works great for me. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/05/2012 04:15 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script then run it instead of the tty? What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have lost that info. history | less When I'm editing, particularly in BLFS, or when I'm trying to fix a new build failure, I use that a lot. ĸen Very good, Learned something today -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Ken Moffat wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:54:50PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: Yes but what really is the difference if you cut and paste to a script then run it instead of the tty? What that gives me is a way of looking over what I had done when it doesn't work. If I cut and paste to a term then I have lost that info. history | less When I'm editing, particularly in BLFS, or when I'm trying to fix a new build failure, I use that a lot. Or 'history | grep configure', etc. When you do have a problem line, you can always do 'command 21 | tee file.log' -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder snip I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard During pass 1, GCC requires the GMP, MPC and MPFR libraries, but we don't want GCC to get these libraries from the host. GCC searches for the libraries either via the regular search paths *or* inside it's own source tree. We install a temporary copy inside the GCC source tree to take advantage of this, and thus allow GCC to not be contaminated with host libraries During pass 2, we are in a protected chroot environment, so we are no longer concerned about the host. So other programs in pass 2 can take advantage of the GMP, MPC and MPFR libraries later in the build, we install them before GCC instead of in the source tree. -- -- - Steve Crosby -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Walter Webb wrote: I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. I'm glad you got it to build, but that's the conclusion of a simple empiricist. It's like me saying that because I went to the kitchen and made a cup of tea before it built successfully, then it must have been the tea. I also unset MAKEFLAGS from -j 2 and it *didn't* work for me. Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can cause race conditions that sometimes cause a failure. I suppose we can put a warning about this in the gcc sections, but we'd need it in three places. -- Bruce There's already a warning near the beginning of the book. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Another day, another try. I extracted the gcc again and did it again, and this time it worked. Thanks all for your support. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: Walter Webb wrote: I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. I'm glad you got it to build, but that's the conclusion of a simple empiricist. It's like me saying that because I went to the kitchen and made a cup of tea before it built successfully, then it must have been the tea. I also unset MAKEFLAGS from -j 2 and it *didn't* work for me. Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can cause race conditions that sometimes cause a failure. I suppose we can put a warning about this in the gcc sections, but we'd need it in three places. -- Bruce There's already a warning near the beginning of the book. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 11:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Walter Webb wrote: I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can cause race conditions that sometimes cause a failure. I suppose we can put a warning about this in the gcc sections, but we'd need it in three places. -- Bruce On the other hand, I have compiled LFS-6.8 to LFS-7.1 ( will do 7.2 soon ) with the following without error MAKEFLAGS=-j4 CARCH=x86_64 case $CARCH in i686) CFLAGS=-march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=-march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe ;; x86_64) CFLAGS=-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe ;; esac LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro export CARCH MAKEFLAGS CFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS I did have some trouble compiling gcc-4.6.[1,2] when using the host installed gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120507 (Red Hat 4.7.0-5) I needed to patch the build for Chapter 5 pass-1 only and it was good after that. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 2012-09-03 07:53, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build make: *** [all] Error 2 I have done the tar and mv of the MPFR-3.1.1 for sure. Regards, Israel The question is did you do them inside the gcc-4.7.1 directory as it states? Could you attach the output of ls -lah run inside the gcc-4.7.1 directory please. -- Jasmine Iwanek -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Sep 3, 2012, at 01:53 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). Most likely trying to use the host's installed mpfr. First extract the gcc tarball from the sources directory and then change to the directory created. Only then should you proceed with the instructions below. (note at gcc pass1) Example: cd $LFS/sources tar xf gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2 cd gcc-4.7.1 tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp tar -zxf ../mpc-1.0.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0 mpc .rest of book commands for gcc pass1 Section 5.3 is clear, the note of gcc is clear. not sure what else could be said to make it clear. Prerequisites are clear. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Hi, Thanks for your reply. I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:22 AM, William Harrington berzerk...@cox.netwrote: On Sep 3, 2012, at 01:53 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: checking for MPFR... no configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). Most likely trying to use the host's installed mpfr. First extract the gcc tarball from the sources directory and then change to the directory created. Only then should you proceed with the instructions below. (note at gcc pass1) Example: cd $LFS/sources tar xf gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2 cd gcc-4.7.1 tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp tar -zxf ../mpc-1.0.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0 mpc .rest of book commands for gcc pass1 Section 5.3 is clear, the note of gcc is clear. not sure what else could be said to make it clear. Prerequisites are clear. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On Sep 3, 2012, at 06:33 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply. I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr Also, the other problem would be that LFS_TGT isn't set. We can tell by looking at config.log . You should be the lfs user the whole time. Double check your environment as created in chapter 4 when creating the lfs user. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib I know it's frustrating -- it's the same bug that I and numerous others have experienced, but none of the team will accept that it's a bug. It took me four or five attempts to get GCC to build, but my problem was at pass 2. At one attempt I even copied and pasted the whole instruction set and it still failed at the same point that you've found. Bruce suggested wrapping the commands in a script so you can see what's happening, and that seems like a good idea, however I had already built it by then by doing nothing different -- just trying it yet again. I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote: I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. Richard As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being built, and GMP, MPC, and MPFR aren't actually needed as part of said toolchain. With the last build, you're building the final system, and so they need to be installed in the system before building the new system's compiler. Of course, I expect to be corrected by an editor who's been building it several thousand times a year. :) Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 11:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote: I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC except on the final build where they are built separately. As I understand it, with the first two times the toolchain is being built, and GMP, MPC, and MPFR aren't actually needed as part of said toolchain. With the last build, you're building the final system, and so they need to be installed in the system before building the new system's compiler. The only program in Chapter 5 that needs GMP, MPC, and MPFR is gcc and having gcc build them is easier than three additional sections. In Chapter 6 they are separate so other programs can use them if desired. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? On Sep 3, 2012 7:24 PM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.3K Jul 14 2005 symlink-tree -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 6.1K Aug 22 2009 ylwrap drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 zlib I know it's frustrating -- it's the same bug that I and numerous others have experienced, but none of the team will accept that it's a bug. It took me four or five attempts to get GCC to build, but my problem was at pass 2. At one attempt I even copied and pasted the whole instruction set and it still failed at the same point that you've found. Bruce suggested wrapping the commands in a script so you can see what's happening, and that seems like a good idea, however I had already built it by then by doing nothing different
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Removing gcc can do a couple of things. First is saves some space. Second, it makes is more difficult for a bad guy to compile malware for the system. The original worm, the Morris worm around 1988, propagated itself via email where sendmail automatically compiled a program and ran it. That hole has been closed for a long time, but in theory, the same thing can happen if the compiler is present. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a software works because you wrote it good or because it has the compiler's enviroment. Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will have a comfertable way to update it? On Sep 3, 2012 9:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 9/3/2012 12:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? Why do you want to remove gcc at all? If you want to add ANY new programs at all, you'll need gcc in order to compile and install them properly. Even if you want to use other compilers, they still need to be compiled and installed with gcc prior to removing gcc at all. Removing gcc can do a couple of things. First is saves some space. Second, it makes is more difficult for a bad guy to compile malware for the system. The original worm, the Morris worm around 1988, propagated itself via email where sendmail automatically compiled a program and ran it. That hole has been closed for a long time, but in theory, the same thing can happen if the compiler is present. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 01:24 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: Thaks all for the replies, Richard, what do you mean by puting it in a script to what is going on? How do I make the script write me the data I need? I know some bash scripting but clearly not enogh :-) And another question, if I want in the end tohave a LFS or BLFS system without gcc in it, shold I keep it in the toolchain or should I remove it when the system is done? How can I remove it? Should I keep its installation folder and not delete it in order to do make remove? On Sep 3, 2012 7:24 PM, Richard Melville richard.melvill...@googlemail.com mailto:richard.melvill...@googlemail.com wrote: I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder and the configure and make are from gcc-build Here is the output for ls -lah of gcc-4.7.1 lfs@kitt-Lenovo-Product:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.7.1$ ls -lah total 11M drwxr-xr-x 33 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:25 . drwxrwxrwt 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Sep 3 09:27 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 38K Jul 4 2003 ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 18K Jul 14 2005 COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 26K Jul 14 2005 COPYING.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Apr 9 2009 COPYING.RUNTIME -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 35K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 7.5K Jul 17 2007 COPYING3.LIB -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 524K Jun 14 11:27 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 3.2K May 13 2004 ChangeLog.tree-ssa drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 INSTALL -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 58 Jun 14 11:48 LAST_UPDATED -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 22K Feb 17 2012 MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0M Jun 14 13:01 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Jan 2 2012 Makefile.def -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.4M May 16 18:54 Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 67K May 16 18:54 Makefile.tpl -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 579K Jun 14 11:48 NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 815 Oct 10 2009 README drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 boehm-gc -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.7K Aug 22 2009 compile drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 config -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 25K Mar 22 2011 config-ml.in http://config-ml.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 44K Jun 6 2011 config.guess -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 15K Feb 13 2011 config.rpath -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 35K Nov 2 2011 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 458K Feb 2 2012 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 101K Feb 2 2012 configure.ac http://configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 contrib -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 19K Aug 22 2009 depcomp drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 fixincludes drwxr-xr-x 17 lfs lfs 20K Sep 3 09:27 gcc drwxr-xr-x 14 lfs lfs 4.0K May 6 14:20 gmp drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 gnattools drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 include -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 14K Aug 22 2009 install-sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 intl drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libada drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libcpp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libdecnumber drwxr-xr-x 7 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libffi drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libgcc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libgfortran drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libgo drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:02 libgomp drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 libiberty drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 13:01 libitm drwxr-xr-x 15 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 libjava drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libmudflap drwxr-xr-x 4 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:47 libobjc drwxr-xr-x 5 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 12:49 libquadmath drwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:48 libssp drwxr-xr-x 11 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:34 libstdc++-v3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.3K Sep 20 2007 libtool-ldflags -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 258K Nov 21 2011 libtool.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 1.8K Sep 26 2008 ltgcc.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 244K Jan 13 2011 ltmain.sh drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:35 lto-plugin -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 12K Dec 5 2009 ltoptions.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 4.3K Sep 26 2008 ltsugar.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 703 Dec 5 2009 ltversion.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 6.0K Dec 5 2009 lt~obsolete.m4 drwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4.0K Jun 14 11:37 maintainer-scripts -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 12K Aug 22 2009 missing -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.2K Jul 22 2000 mkdep -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 3.5K Aug 22 2009 mkinstalldirs -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 2.6K Feb 12 2011 move-if-change drwxr-xr-x 6 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 19 15:46 mpc drwxr-xr-x 9 lfs lfs 4.0K Jul 3 18:02 mpfr -rwxr-xr-x
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
On 09/03/2012 03:51 PM, Israel Silberg wrote: And another thing, when you have a compiler you never know if a software works because you wrote it good or because it has the compiler's enviroment. Anotger question a bit OT, can a LFS be built from rpms so we will have a comfertable way to update it? [putolin] I have built it using Arch linux pacman package manager which for my purpose is better. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1
Walter Webb wrote: I just joined this list and can't respond properly. I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. Good point. Using -j 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can cause race conditions that sometimes cause a failure. I suppose we can put a warning about this in the gcc sections, but we'd need it in three places. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
