Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Joren DC jore...@libreoffice.org wrote: Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41: lo (6) lobz (7) Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway between the top votes :)? Sounds fine w/me. (LBJ isn't as cool a mascot as a Lobster, but I will deal with it :-) --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC jore...@libreoffice.org wrote: Here are the final tallies from the voting: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. blo (1) libo (2) lbz (3) lob (3) lo (6) lobz (7) - Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway between the top votes :)? I don't really want to get involved in this bikesheding, but if there was a vote at a QA meeting, it sounds unfair to me take the result of that into this list and start arguing against its result. Why would anyone cast his/her vote seriously next time, if the result of the vote is not respected? Miklos signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC jore...@libreoffice.org wrote: What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway between the top votes :)? I don't really want to get involved in this bikesheding, but if there was a vote at a QA meeting, it sounds unfair to me take the result of that into this list and start arguing against its result. Given that the top two choices (lo and lobz) were separated by only 1 vote and were both far ahead of the other options, suggesting a compromise seems like a reasonable action. Why would anyone cast his/her vote seriously next time, if the result of the vote is not respected? I believe the vote is being respected, but I don't want to get into that here. As many have said, we're just bikeshedding here. I apologize for drawing out this discussion on the dev list for so long -- I'll take this discussion back to the QA list. Cheers, --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: lo (6) lobz (7) Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) Hi all, In the voting rules I said If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off. A number of people have decried the process as bikeshedding, so I'll leave this in your hands: Does anyone want a run-off? If you do, please ping me by Sunday and we will have one. Notes: * Feel free to ping me on- or off-list * To clarify: We'll have the run-off if 1+ persons request it Thanks, --R P.S. As a side note, the UNCONFIRMED bug count was up by just _2_ at the last QA Meeting. Everyone in QA been doing amazing work -- let's keep up the push through the holiday season! https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#UNCONFIRMED_Bugs woot! :-) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi everyone, Here are the final tallies from the voting: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. blo (1) libo (2) lbz (3) lob (3) lo (6) lobz (7) - Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) Best, --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41: Hi everyone, Here are the final tallies from the voting: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. blo (1) libo (2) lbz (3) lob (3) lo (6) lobz (7) - Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway between the top votes :)? Just my 2 cents Kind regards, Joren ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
(I'm not on the list, but saw Robinson's update on the wiki and then on the list) On Sun Dec 1 10:31:47 PST 2013, Robinson Tryon Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz lo#123 or lobz#123 Regards, Dennis Roczek smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:31:53 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com a écrit: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M m...@gmx.fr wrote: You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of people interact with the bugtracker, chief among them, the QA team. Well, I second on Norbert thoughts, and I was just saying, that, if you go for a vote, an announcement to the whole bunch of lists might have brought people in, like enlightning Norbert's views. For me, the abbreviation is just one small part of the bigger Bugzilla migration plan: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. You worked hard, and that was appreciated, don't misunderstand me. But if you don't find a consensus on the QA list, you might ask for wider audience, so my remark. Not a critic in any way. You did your best and we ackowledge that. FWIW, I also appreciate all the bug metrics and follow-up QA provides, it is very nice and useful. Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice IIRC, in en-GB 'loo' == toilet Well, I didn't check and that was more of a friday's troll than a real proposal. (not that there aren't any piss-poor bug reports in FDO right now...) ;-) BTW, I vote also for lo# ok -- vote recorded. If the devs really want lo#, just send in enough people to vote and the outcome will be certain. --R brace yourselves, lo# is coming Mat --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels... Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' IMHO 'the guys doing the work should choose' means 'we're going to leave it up to the best judgment of those people to decide'. I thought that we had a bunch of okay abbreviations, and aside from tdf# (which I wanted to reserve for future use), all of the other names seemed good enough to me, and didn't raise any red flags when I checked-in with the ESC. So, with that information in hand, I figured that I would ask for input from QA, first in the form of searching for consensus, and second (if need be) as a voting process. QA doesn't get to make decisions like this very often, so I thought it would be something fun for us to decide as a team. Alternatively, if we want to interpret this message as ' *only* the guys doing the work should choose', then that's fine with me, too. By my reckoning, that list includes - Cloph (for fixing bots and websites, creating DNS redirects, and generally putting up with all of my requests) - Dennis Roczek (for a bunch of detailed bot work translating urls on the wiki) - Andras Timar (for updating urls in the translations and core git repos) - Tollef (Doing all of the work on the FDO end) - Me (for doing a lot of legwork on the migration) - Some others I've undoubtedly forgotten On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). ok That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. ok So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. If it's a big deal, then yes, I agree we should pay more attention to it. If it's not a big deal, then we go ahead and pick from the list. I just need to get a clear message, one way or the other. I'm sympathetic to input from the developers, even at a late stage in this process, which is precisely why I listened to Eike's comments and wrote The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages). Cheers, --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. A bikeshed is when we have very long discusion about something due to the fact that it is a 'simple' problem, hence everyone feel is his qualified to give some input... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality And yes, I'm guilty of it here... so I'll leave it be for now... if we end up with xkcd# or lobz# I'll be annoyed, but I'll get over it :-D Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:31:53 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com a écrit: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M m...@gmx.fr wrote: You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of people interact with the bugtracker, chief among them, the QA team. Well, I second on Norbert thoughts, and I was just saying, that, if you go for a vote, an announcement to the whole bunch of lists might have brought people in, like enlightning Norbert's views. For me, the abbreviation is just one small part of the bigger Bugzilla migration plan: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. You worked hard, and that was appreciated, don't misunderstand me. But if you don't find a consensus on the QA list, you might ask for wider audience, so my remark. Not a critic in any way. You did your best and we ackowledge that. FWIW, I also appreciate all the bug metrics and follow-up QA provides, it is very nice and useful. Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice IIRC, in en-GB 'loo' == toilet Well, I didn't check and that was more of a friday's troll than a real proposal. (not that there aren't any piss-poor bug reports in FDO right now...) ;-) BTW, I vote also for lo# ok -- vote recorded. If the devs really want lo#, just send in enough people to vote and the outcome will be certain. --R brace yourselves, lo# is coming Mat --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi Rob and All, it is not easy understand what is happening. We are voting after a right process to do it. As Robinson wrote: The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I think everyone in the project can vote here if they want. IMHO, we need to finish the voting process, and communicate the results. If some in the project are not agree, it's fine, they can report to the ESC their reflections and inform their proposal. In last term The Board can take a decision about what better fits for all in the project. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugzilla-Migration-Abbreviation-to-replace-fdo-12345-tp4084355p4087058.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels... Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... I have missed ESC of nov 21st (my fault), but 'the guys doing the work should choose' is not 'the guys doing the work should organize a beauty pageant election' IMHO 'the guys doing the work should choose' means 'we're going to leave it up to the best judgment of those people to decide'. I thought that we had a bunch of okay abbreviations, and aside from tdf# (which I wanted to reserve for future use), all of the other names seemed good enough to me, and didn't raise any red flags when I checked-in with the ESC. So, with that information in hand, I figured that I would ask for input from QA, first in the form of searching for consensus, and second (if need be) as a voting process. QA doesn't get to make decisions like this very often, so I thought it would be something fun for us to decide as a team. Alternatively, if we want to interpret this message as ' *only* the guys doing the work should choose', then that's fine with me, too. By my reckoning, that list includes - Cloph (for fixing bots and websites, creating DNS redirects, and generally putting up with all of my requests) - Dennis Roczek (for a bunch of detailed bot work translating urls on the wiki) - Andras Timar (for updating urls in the translations and core git repos) - Tollef (Doing all of the work on the FDO end) - Me (for doing a lot of legwork on the migration) - Some others I've undoubtedly forgotten On the dev side we are not used to 'vote'. decisions are usually just taken. When there is some controversy, the interested parties expose the merit of their respective positions, explaining the rational for their choice (and I mean _rational_ not _feelings_). ok That usually lead to either a compromise to address each other points, or the parties rallying around the rational of one side (we all have 'opinions' on anything when asked... but more often than not we do not _care_ that much about a given topic, so unless we have a strong argument to offer we usually do not demand that our opinions be counted as strongly as the one of the people intimately involved with the work and problems associated with it.. iow 'pick your battle wisely' :-) )), or more often a combination of both. in 3 years we where driven to a vote only once.. and even then that was more to have each position 'on the record'. ok So in that light I would point out again the criteria _I_ think are relevant for the name here: 1/ short. the summary commit message is the 1st line of a commit message, and is limited to 80 chars (72 preferred), and when a commit refer to a bug we want the bug reference in that message. 2/ obvious meaning and easy to remember and type, as much as possible. The opposition I've seen so far to lo# are centered around 'it can be confused with the abbreviation of the product'. I think that is a feature not a bug. in the context of bugzilla the use will always be lo#number the # make it clear that it is a bug number and remove any ambiguity... furtheremore these _are_ libreoffice bugs.. lo = libreoffice, # = bug here. So, other abbreviation may have merit, and may prevails, but discarding lo# for that reason seems a red herring to me. for reference a quick grep of the log message give use the following uses: fdo# deb# n#n #inn# rhbz#nn CID#n cp# bnc# abi# i# #n# lp#n and a mix bag of some mistyped variations thereof (like #fdo) Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. If it's a big deal, then yes, I agree we should pay more attention to it. If it's not a big deal, then we go ahead and pick from the list. I just need to get a clear message, one way or the other. I'm sympathetic to input from the developers, even at a late stage in this process, which is precisely why I listened to Eike's comments and wrote The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages). Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Up at the top of your email you said: I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this... ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This is clearly not a bikeshed decision, or you and Mat would (hopefully) not be so invested in what abbreviation is chosen. A bikeshed is when we have very long discusion about something due to the fact that it is a 'simple' problem, hence everyone feel is his qualified to give some input... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality And yes, I'm guilty of it here... so I'll leave it be for now... if we end up with xkcd# or lobz# I'll be annoyed, but I'll get over it :-D Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hello Robinson, * Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:54:07 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com a écrit: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# true. I'd always like to have more devs listening-in on what we talk about on the QA list... ;-) You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... Fair, fair. One other thing: The abbreviation has a secondary purpose: to be used as shorthand for the bugtracker. Using our two highest-profile options: Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice BTW, I vote also for lo# if loo# has no access to the vote list ;) Mat ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M m...@gmx.fr wrote: You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of people interact with the bugtracker, chief among them, the QA team. For me, the abbreviation is just one small part of the bigger Bugzilla migration plan: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal The reason we're having a vote now is because Nov 8 - I mentioned abbreviation in the proposal Nov 10/11 - Discussed abbrevs on the QA list Nov 18 - QA Meeting decided to ask ESC for input Nov 21 - ESC offered suggestions; said the guys doing the work should choose. Nov 21 - Looked for consensus on QA list Dec 1 - Saw no consensus; Moving to vote on the QA list I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels. Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time on just this one little piece. Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice IIRC, in en-GB 'loo' == toilet (not that there aren't any piss-poor bug reports in FDO right now...) if loo# has no access to the vote list ;) Given that I already outlined the parameters for voting, I'm not sure it'd be appropriate for me to change them now. BTW, I vote also for lo# ok -- vote recorded. If the devs really want lo#, just send in enough people to vote and the outcome will be certain. --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hello Robinson, * Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:54:07 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com a écrit: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# true. I'd always like to have more devs listening-in on what we talk about on the QA list... ;-) You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists, then you'd been more votes. PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... Fair, fair. One other thing: The abbreviation has a secondary purpose: to be used as shorthand for the bugtracker. Using our two highest-profile options: Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ Well, if you want to mimic fdo, abbrev should be loo (libreoffice.org instead of freedesktop.org) loo is a good trade-off : more than 2, but less than 4; different of the standard lo we use to shortcut LibreOffice BTW, I vote also for lo# if loo# has no access to the vote list ;) Mat ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * lo 1st rank. YES! ... * lobz No, too long. Lobster, anyone? From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the alreay short enough commit summary line. Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# true. I'd always like to have more devs listening-in on what we talk about on the QA list... ;-) Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... Fair, fair. One other thing: The abbreviation has a secondary purpose: to be used as shorthand for the bugtracker. Using our two highest-profile options: Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... ... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) true, the bots are kind of annoying in that regard :-) --R ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Agreed.. no argument there :-) I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... :-D , I thought you'd like it :-) Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * lo 1st rank. YES! ... * lobz No, too long. Lobster, anyone? From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the alreay short enough commit summary line. Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. --R, thinking that LObster might not be the worst idea for our mascot :-) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * lo 1st rank. YES! ... * lobz No, too long. Lobster, anyone? From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the alreay short enough commit summary line. Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# true. I'd always like to have more devs listening-in on what we talk about on the QA list... ;-) Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... Fair, fair. One other thing: The abbreviation has a secondary purpose: to be used as shorthand for the bugtracker. Using our two highest-profile options: Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... ... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) true, the bots are kind of annoying in that regard :-) --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Agreed.. no argument there :-) I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... :-D , I thought you'd like it :-) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:12 AM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:51:55PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: The nice thing with putting everything under a LibreOffice bugtracker for now is that if in the future we do decide to migrate bugtracking for TDF-specific web infra to a separate instance, that's going to be a much smaller and simpler piece. This was what I was thinking of, yep. I think that should not be 'in the future'. from the start the libreoffice bugzilla should be libreoffice centric. tdf-infra has it's own ways and likely will have way different workflow than lo wrt the handling of these.. and yes, tdf is likely to one day have other product under its umbrella, so not repeating the fdo situation, just somewhere else... would be wise. With the expeirence of setting a large bugzilla up likewe need... it should not be that hard to creat a separate instance for infra...and in the future a separate instance for other project that may come along Norbert Note: that is why using lo/libo prefix is not only not an issue but in fact desirable to associate strongly the bugzilla instance with the product it tracks... and as bjoern said.. the prefix is really lo# and every instance would be lo# that cannot be confuse with the porduct itself anymore that fdo#nnn can be confused with fdo the org. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:09:06AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: With the expeirence of setting a large bugzilla up likewe need... it should not be that hard to creat a separate instance for infra...and in the future a separate instance for other project that may come along Im pretty certain infra wont go with bugzilla though -- currently their favourite is RedMine. But yeah, the original point made still stands mixing LibreOffice the product with other issue tracking in the project is likely unhelpful. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:21 AM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:09:06AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: With the expeirence of setting a large bugzilla up likewe need... it should not be that hard to creat a separate instance for infra...and in the future a separate instance for other project that may come along Im pretty certain infra wont go with bugzilla though -- currently their favourite is RedMine. Yeah, they are notorious for settling on obscure, never heard of (and never heard of again :-) ) tools, like OTRS, sphynx, etc... :-D Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:21 AM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:09:06AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: With the expeirence of setting a large bugzilla up likewe need... it should not be that hard to creat a separate instance for infra...and in the future a separate instance for other project that may come along Im pretty certain infra wont go with bugzilla though -- currently their favourite is RedMine. But yeah, the original point made still stands mixing LibreOffice the product with other issue tracking in the project is likely unhelpful. Until someone in infra tells me otherwise, I'm going to assume that all of the bugs and bugtracking categories covered under the 'LibreOffice' product on FDO will migrate to the new Bugzilla instance being set up by Tollef. I'm quite supportive of carving-off all of our non-LibreOffice-specific bugs and shoving them into a separate bugtracker, but my thinking here is to focus on one step at a time. --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:45:33AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: Until someone in infra tells me otherwise, I'm going to assume that all of the bugs and bugtracking categories covered under the 'LibreOffice' product on FDO will migrate to the new Bugzilla instance being set up by Tollef. I'm quite supportive of carving-off all of our non-LibreOffice-specific bugs and shoving them into a separate bugtracker, but my thinking here is to focus on one step at a time. Yup. Listen, I'm a politician which means I'm a cheat and a liar, and when I'm not kissing babies I'm stealing their lollipops. But it also means I keep my options open. -- Jeffrey Pelt, The Hunt for Red October Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz Thanks, --R ___ my two votes go to: lob lobz ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) ... If there's no obvious winner after a few days, we can take a vote. Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz Thanks, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, I am voting for libo only ;) Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian Reisinger Am 01.12.2013 um 19:31 schrieb Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) ... If there's no obvious winner after a few days, we can take a vote. Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz Thanks, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hello Robinson, *, On Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013 19:31 Robinson Tryon wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: [new abbreviation for bugs.libreoffice.org] Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo +1 Have a nice evening Thomas. -- Do not lose your knowledge that man's proper estate is an upright posture, an intransigent mind, and a step that travels unlimited roads. -- John Galt, in Ayn Rand's _Atlas Shrugged_ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 12:31 PM Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo -- No * lbz -- Yes * libo -- No * lo -- No * lob -- No * lobz -- Yes Stuart ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Robinson Tryon schreef op 1/12/13 19:31: Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo No * lbz Yes * libo Yes * lo No * lob Yes * lobz Yes If I only can make 1 vote: libo Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi Rob, Am 01.12.2013 19:31, schrieb Robinson Tryon: Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off I am voting for libo Regards Jochen ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
I like libo# and lobz# Am 01.12.2013 19:31, schrieb Robinson Tryon: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) ... If there's no obvious winner after a few days, we can take a vote. Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz Thanks, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
+1 lobz, I think no confusions. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugzilla-Migration-Abbreviation-to-replace-fdo-12345-tp4084355p4084623.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:52:27 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) ... Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo please, avoid. I don't wanna be exposed to unpolite jokes about QA is doing blo job * lbz no. phonetically unfriendly. * libo no. abbreviation is already used to describe the software * lo no. it makes me think about J-Lo :-) * lob yes. easy to understand even for newbies: LOB#1234 = LibreOfficeBug#1234 * lobz yes. same as before: LOBZ#1234 = LibreOfficeBugZilla#1234 * tdf no. tdf is another thing. so basically my first pick is lob and my second pick is lobz ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hello Jean-Baptiste, *, On Donnerstag, 21. November 2013 22:02 Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 21/11/2013 19:52, Robinson Tryon a écrit : Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo why not but not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 I would prefer blo, as it is the short form for bugs.libreoffice.org ... ;) Maybe we could use b.l.o to circumvent the phonetical similarity to the English word blow ... ;) * lbz OK To me, it sounds like a a name of a GNU/Linux package, -1 * libo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself +1 * lo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself +1 * lob Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 -1. The word Lob in German means something like kudos or praise. And there is a term in tennis, which is called lob as well ... :( * lobz Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 0 ... I have not a clear opinion here, sorry ... :( * tdf No, tdf =/= LibreOffice Yes, I think tdf is not that ideal. If TDF may take other projects under its wings, then it could lead to some kind of confusion ... HTH Thomas. -- DELETE A FORTUNE! Don't some of these fortunes just drive you nuts?! Wouldn't you like to see some of them deleted from the system? You can! Just mail to `fortune' with the fortune you hate most, and we'll make sure it gets expunged. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, My opinion: Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo no. The relation with the english word 'blow' is to big. * lbz Fine by me * libo * lo no. I don't think that a abbrivation of the product is going to work * lob * lobz Fine by me * tdf Here is the discussion about if we need to have bugs.documentfoundation.org. I don't think you want that because tdf can have other products. Only if you want this bugzilla only for libo then where will the bugs for the websites of tdf go? Will they stay at freedesktop or go to the libo-bugzilla? As you follow this rule they should go to somewhere else as the libo-bugzilla. Greetings, Rob Snelders Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:51:55PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: The nice thing with putting everything under a LibreOffice bugtracker for now is that if in the future we do decide to migrate bugtracking for TDF-specific web infra to a separate instance, that's going to be a much smaller and simpler piece. This was what I was thinking of, yep. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Vote: Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo -- NO * lbz -- YES, but only as alternative to tdf * libo -- NO * lo -- NO * lob -- NO * lobz -- NO * tdf -- YES, of course LibreOffice is not The Document Foundation, but TDF is LibreOffice's home and the Foundations objective to nurture and develop office software that is free to use by everyone would be well represented by an association to a tdf#12345 Bugzilla tracker. The freedesktop.org--fdo-- infrastructure support has served us well, and a tdf# notation for our own infrastructure would be correct. Stuart ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:59 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote: * tdf -- YES, of course LibreOffice is not The Document Foundation, but TDF is LibreOffice's home and the Foundations objective to nurture and develop office software that is free to use by everyone would be well represented by an association to a tdf#12345 Bugzilla tracker. The freedesktop.org--fdo-- infrastructure support has served us well, and a tdf# notation for our own infrastructure would be correct. If we go that route, we should use the url bugs.documentfoundation.org Thoughts?? --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: If we go that route, we should use the url bugs.documentfoundation.org A big part of this exercise is to not have LibreOffice bug mixed with others anymore. As such documentfoundation just seems wrong to me as tdf might have other projects and if those use our bugzilla they will be guests on the LibreOffice bugzilla because of the volume. We already essentially took over fdo by volume, so lets keep this one dedicated to LO and LO only. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:02:32PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: * libo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself * lo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself It will never be used standalone and lo#12345 isnt going to be confused. * lob Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 * lobz Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 see above, no such issue as there is lo# as with all bug refs. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:38 PM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: If we go that route, we should use the url bugs.documentfoundation.org A big part of this exercise is to not have LibreOffice bug mixed with others anymore. As such documentfoundation just seems wrong to me as tdf might have other projects and if those use our bugzilla they will be guests on the LibreOffice bugzilla because of the volume. We already essentially took over fdo by volume, so lets keep this one dedicated to LO and LO only. Post-migration, candidates to be 'products' in the bugtracker include: - LibreOffice application - Android/iOS remote - BSA - Anything web-related for libreoffice - Anything web-related for TDF On the one hand, that list includes things that aren't strictly the LibreOffice application. On the other hand, pretty much everything else on that list 1) exists to support the LibreOffice application 2) is dwarfed by the bugtracking needs of the LibreOffice application I see arguments from both sides, but I feel like the 800-lb application on the list wins out. The nice thing with putting everything under a LibreOffice bugtracker for now is that if in the future we do decide to migrate bugtracking for TDF-specific web infra to a separate instance, that's going to be a much smaller and simpler piece. Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
-Original Message- From: Robinson Tryon [mailto:bishop.robin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:02 PM If we go that route, we should use the url bugs.documentfoundation.org Thoughts?? Well it would have the advantage of neutral Bugzilla support for any other TDF projects and infrastructure resources--e.g. Tinderbox, Mail lists, Ask, WWW, wiki, Twitter, etc. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Le 21/11/2013 19:52, Robinson Tryon a écrit : Hi all, [...] Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo why not but not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 * lbz OK * libo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself * lo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself * lob Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 * lobz Not sure if having a o in the abbreviation is a good idea, risk of error with 0 * tdf No, tdf =/= LibreOffice Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) Per our last meeting, I talked with the ESC about abbreviations: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_02#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. The ESC gave a few more suggestions, and said that the people doing the work should choose -- so I figured I would email out to all of our marvelous QA contributors and ask them to weigh-in! For the next couple of days, please provide comments on the proposed names. I suggest that you provide simple, direct reasons in favor of (or against) particular names. If there's no obvious winner after a few days, we can take a vote. Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo * lbz * libo * lo * lob * lobz * tdf Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, Am 21.11.2013 um 19:52 schrieb Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com: Hi all, Let's pick a new abbreviation to use for our bugtracker :-) Per our last meeting, I talked with the ESC about abbreviations: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_02#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. The ESC gave a few more suggestions, and said that the people doing the work should choose -- so I figured I would email out to all of our marvelous QA contributors and ask them to weigh-in! For the next couple of days, please provide comments on the proposed names. I suggest that you provide simple, direct reasons in favor of (or against) particular names. If there's no obvious winner after a few days, we can take a vote. VOTED Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo Adapts the current name shema.. * lbz Difficult to speak out as a word * libo I guess, that this is my favorite * lo I dislike that * lob Would use this instead * lobz Difficult to spell * tdf LibreOffice != TDF, that, why I dislike that Cheers, --R Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian Reisinger ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: * blo This one blows * lbz Ok * libo Ok * lo Good. Easy to pronounce. * lob Good. Easiest to pronounce. * lobz Ok. Amusing to pronounce. * tdf Libreoffice/TDF are different. Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Hi, Le 22/11/2013 00:38, bjoern a écrit : [...] On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:02:32PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: * libo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself * lo No, it is a common abbreviation for the software itself It will never be used standalone and lo#12345 isnt going to be confused. My fear was, if we use lo#12345 or libo#12345, that when somebody tell lo or libo we don't know if he speaks about the software or its bugtracker. If we use the abbreviation lbz#12345 there is no ambiguity. Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/