Re: Thin bars
Hello,
here is the doc:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/BarLine#BarLine
and snip:
% -
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override BarLine #'hair-thickness = #0.1
\override BarLine #'thick-thickness = #0.3
% -
These are *too* thin.
2009/1/20 Fibonacci Prower :
> Well, I just tried printing the document with Adobe Reader under
> WinXP. At least the bars have just the right length, but they still
> look too thick.
> Even if I still used Evince, I could take care of that if there were
> any way to hand-tune the length and thickness of the bars. How do I do
> that?
>
> 2009/1/19 Francisco Vila :
>> These links show already filed bugs on the issue. I am completely sure
>> that I myself filed a bug on poppler or libpoppler regarding to the
>> lilypond barlines, but I cannot find the URL despite of having been
>> searching for half an hour now.
>>
>> Poppler is the PDF rendering library of evince, if I'm not wrong.
>>
>> The bug is annoying because evince is the default document viewer in
>> Ubuntu and printed LilyPond scores are very ugly even on
>> high-resolution printers (or monitors!) when printed (or viewed!) with
>> evince.
>>
>> [Bug 247113] [NEW] vertical bars are too thick
>> http://www.archivum.info/ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com/2008-07/msg10441.html
>>
>> vertical bars are too thick
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/247113
>> --
>> Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
>> http://www.paconet.org
> --
> $0='!/msfQ0yjoV!fe!sfldbi!psup!pmpT'x19xor print+map{("\e[7m \e[0m",
> chr ord(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%72]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',(
> $P='F'x18)."8186078739E1F0F0E19FCF19CCE6667383CF0733099E67E7F39"
> ."FCF218067E7F39FCF319E739F860787399E70F0E1$P"#Perl rulz
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Thin bars
Well, I just tried printing the document with Adobe Reader under
WinXP. At least the bars have just the right length, but they still
look too thick.
Even if I still used Evince, I could take care of that if there were
any way to hand-tune the length and thickness of the bars. How do I do
that?
2009/1/19 Francisco Vila :
> These links show already filed bugs on the issue. I am completely sure
> that I myself filed a bug on poppler or libpoppler regarding to the
> lilypond barlines, but I cannot find the URL despite of having been
> searching for half an hour now.
>
> Poppler is the PDF rendering library of evince, if I'm not wrong.
>
> The bug is annoying because evince is the default document viewer in
> Ubuntu and printed LilyPond scores are very ugly even on
> high-resolution printers (or monitors!) when printed (or viewed!) with
> evince.
>
> [Bug 247113] [NEW] vertical bars are too thick
> http://www.archivum.info/ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com/2008-07/msg10441.html
>
> vertical bars are too thick
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/247113
> --
> Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
> http://www.paconet.org
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
--
$0='!/msfQ0yjoV!fe!sfldbi!psup!pmpT'x19xor print+map{("\e[7m \e[0m",
chr ord(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%72]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',(
$P='F'x18)."8186078739E1F0F0E19FCF19CCE6667383CF0733099E67E7F39"
."FCF218067E7F39FCF319E739F860787399E70F0E1$P"#Perl rulz
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tuplet bracket required, override doesn't work?
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:34 -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Tom Hall wrote:
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have brackkets
print by default in such cases?
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\times 2/3 { r8 e4 }
%Build 2.12.1-1, OSX.4.11 PPC
Regards
Tom
Strange. Notice that the bracket appears in all of these except the
situation Tom gave:
I suspect it's because the r8 e4 example is too narrow. It is the
narrowest of all these examples, so there is probably not enough room
for the tuplet bracket. I'd suggest that the best solution in this case
would be to widen the tuplet bracket rather than suppressing it.
Joe
I think you're right, Joe. Kieren's suggestion on the other thread
"spacer notes question" helps here, too. Adding a little X extent fixes
the problem:
\times 2/3{ r8 \once \override Stem #'X-extent = #'(-1 . 2) e4 }
Thanks!
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tuplet bracket required, override doesn't work?
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:34 -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Tom Hall wrote:
> > Hello List
> >
> > A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4)
> > note,
> > by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an
> > overide as
> > below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have
> > brackkets
> > print by default in such cases?
> >
> > \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
> >
> > \times 2/3 { r8 e4 }
> >
> > %Build 2.12.1-1, OSX.4.11 PPC
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> Strange. Notice that the bracket appears in all of these except the
> situation Tom gave:
I suspect it's because the r8 e4 example is too narrow. It is the
narrowest of all these examples, so there is probably not enough room
for the tuplet bracket. I'd suggest that the best solution in this case
would be to widen the tuplet bracket rather than suppressing it.
Joe
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing notes question
Thanks Kieren,
That's definately a keeper in my mailbox. I was looking at everything
about spacer notes and spacer rests trying to get something to work
there and nothing did. Your solution is perfect.
Thanks,
Chip
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Chip,
How do I resolve this?
When it comes to spacing, I only resort to "spacer notes" in rare
circumstances — instead, I prefer to manipulate the X-extent of the
objects, to force the space I need. Here's an example in this case:
%
\version "2.12.0"
\include "english.ly"
music =
{
r16 a a8 a16 a8 g16-\bendAfter #-4 \bar "|"
}
\score
{
\music
}
noteFix = { \once \override Stem #'X-extent = #'(2 . 10) }
fixedMusic =
{
r16 a a8 a16 a8 \noteFix g16-\bendAfter #-4 \bar "|"
}
\score
{
\fixedMusic
}
%
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3777 (20090119) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tuplet bracket required, override doesn't work?
Tom Hall wrote:
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have brackkets
print by default in such cases?
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\times 2/3 { r8 e4 }
%Build 2.12.1-1, OSX.4.11 PPC
Regards
Tom
Strange. Notice that the bracket appears in all of these except the
situation Tom gave:
\version "2.12.1"
\relative c'' {
%\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
c8 d \times 2/3{ r8 e4 } \times 2/3{ r4 e8 } \times 2/3{ r8 e e }
\times 2/3{r4 e e } \times 2/3{e8 e4 }
}
I thought at first that it didn't like something about the combination
of the 8th + quarter durations in a tuplet, but the last example has
those durations and the bracket appears. It only leaves the bracket out
if it's an 8th rest followed by a quarter note. The quarter rest
followed by 8th note has a bracket.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: spacing notes question
Hi Chip,
How do I resolve this?
When it comes to spacing, I only resort to "spacer notes" in rare
circumstances — instead, I prefer to manipulate the X-extent of the
objects, to force the space I need. Here's an example in this case:
%
\version "2.12.0"
\include "english.ly"
music =
{
r16 a a8 a16 a8 g16-\bendAfter #-4 \bar "|"
}
\score
{
\music
}
noteFix = { \once \override Stem #'X-extent = #'(2 . 10) }
fixedMusic =
{
r16 a a8 a16 a8 \noteFix g16-\bendAfter #-4 \bar "|"
}
\score
{
\fixedMusic
}
%
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
spacing notes question
r16 a a8 a16 a8 g16-\bendAfter #-4 In the above snippet the drop at the end of the measure is cut short by the barline. I reviewed the info in the manuals about spacer notes but just don't get how to insert a little extra space between the barline and the drop. Right now the drop line gets cut very short, almost to a drop glissando. I've tried adding s8 or s16 etc but that just results in a measure error. How do I resolve this? -- Thanks, Chip ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
tuplet bracket required, override doesn't work?
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have brackkets
print by default in such cases?
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\times 2/3 { r8 e4 }
%Build 2.12.1-1, OSX.4.11 PPC
Regards
Tom
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
Jonathan Kulp wrote: I don't know. This is definitely a strange example. The \mark command is meant to insert something over a barline, so maybe it'd be best to delete this example altogether and reword things a bit so that the example with "colla parte" is the only one illustrating this feature. Agreed! It's very rare to insert textual indications between the notes within a measure (where, on the other hand, it's not uncommon to attach textual indications to a specific note, i.e. using a text script). You might want to replace "colla parte" with "Coda", but again it's very hard to illustrate the usefulness of using \mark for textual indications if you're not allowed to change the alignment to #LEFT or #RIGHT. I'm not convinced that it's less confusing to avoid the use of \override and instead provide more or less irrelevant examples of useful features. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
Lasse Rempe wrote: How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached. If this looks o.k. then I'll make the patch. I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader would interpret the text to correspond to the beginning of the second bar, whereas logically in the lilypond file it would come _after_ the first note. Am I the only one who thinks it is not clean to document this as a standard solution? I don't know. This is definitely a strange example. The \mark command is meant to insert something over a barline, so maybe it'd be best to delete this example altogether and reword things a bit so that the example with "colla parte" is the only one illustrating this feature. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached. If this looks o.k. then I'll make the patch. I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader would interpret the text to correspond to the beginning of the second bar, whereas logically in the lilypond file it would come _after_ the first note. Am I the only one who thinks it is not clean to document this as a standard solution? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 19:32:45 schrieb Lasse Rempe: In 1.8.1, the following is used as an example for text marks: c4 \mark "Allegro" c c c Tempo indications should not use \mark anyway. They should use \tempo "Allegro" instead. (Mis-)Using \mark in our official documentation is a bug in my eyes. +1 Jonathan, please change this to something else. Cheers, - Graham How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached. If this looks o.k. then I'll make the patch. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 19:32:45 schrieb Lasse Rempe: > > In 1.8.1, the following is used as an example for text marks: > > > > c4 \mark "Allegro" c c c > > Tempo indications should not use \mark anyway. They should use > \tempo "Allegro" instead. (Mis-)Using \mark in our official > documentation is a bug in my eyes. +1 Jonathan, please change this to something else. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: No, \mark is mainly used for naming subparts A, B, C, ... These marks are centered over the bar line. Cheers, Reinhold Yes, I am aware of this (this is the only thing I use it for, in fact). However, the section in question discusses placing more expansive text (i.e. full words such as "Allegro", "colla parte", etc.) using the mark command. My comment was related to this, not the standard usage for rehearsal marks. If no-one considers this a common usage, perhaps it should not be in the main part of the "Text mark" section, or at least the section should not begin with it? Lasse ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: "circa" metronome mark
Am 19.01.2009 um 20:27 schrieb J. Van Thuyne: As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would you code this in a correct manner? \tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56 I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign. How can it be overridden? Best regards, Jethro. You'd have to do it as a markup. It won't playback correctly, obviously, but you can use the old markup way to specify this kind of tempo. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 19. Januar 2009 02:23:51 schrieb Lasse Rempe: > Would you consider "Menuetto" / "Trio" as appropriate uses of the \mark > command? If so, these could perhaps be used in the example. > > But even in these cases I would suggest that text in the \mark command, > unless it comes at the beginning of a line (e.g. at the start of a > piece) would not usually be centered over the barline it is associated > to, but rather left-aligned. Do you not agree? No, \mark is mainly used for naming subparts A, B, C, ... These marks are centered over the bar line. Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJdNiyTqjEwhXvPN0RAtYwAKC9qyBwNDqFfKSr0eYRGYQBSJVTKQCeN1wc Z4LHE+04NGWXEXg+m2Tpyd4= =t+0t -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
"circa" metronome mark
As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would you code this in a correct manner? \tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56 I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign. How can it be overridden? Best regards, Jethro. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \skip substitute in lyrics?
Alberto Simões wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alberto
Is there any way to compact this kind of construct?
The simplest way is probably
sopWordsB = \lyricmode {
\repeat "unfold" 48 { \skip 4 }
Re- cor- da- ...
}
1. Would s4 work for \skip 4? I haven't \skip for many many versions
since 's' became functional enough.
2. I usually use _ (underscore) to skip applying a lyric syllable to a
note. ( \repeat unfold nn _ )
3. Are the quotes on "unfold" necessary? I don't put quotes on volta,
unfold or percent and haven't for qui9tes a while.
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 74, Issue 101
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:59:47 -0700 > Andrew Hawryluk wrote: > > > Evince has a problem with the barlines (it's a bug). On Ubuntu, I work > > in Evince while I'm writing, but I print the final PDF from Adobe > > Acrobat. > > xpdf also does a good job and is lighter than Acroread. It's in the repos. > > -- > Nicholas WASTELL > France > > Ha. Microsoft Office and Open Office are "lighter" than Adobe Reader 9! (At least on WinXP) It boggles the mind. I installed Adobe Reader the other day, and when I saw how big it was, I promptly uninstalled it and found a free and more functional replacement. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: splitting chords entered as <>^"with stuff" \etc
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: I find \relative to work quite nicely for chords, once I understood that the first note in a chord gets its octave from the first note of the previous chord. I use \relative mode virtually exclusively for note entry, regardless of whether it's in single notes or using the chord construct < >. I do use absolute when I'm in chordmode. I learned quite a lot writing the script. I had assumed that it was the interval that was important in deciding whether a note was higher or lower than the previous note but I now know that it's based on the note names and ignores accidentals. So ceses->fisis will go up while cisis->geses will go down. It's obvious once you've worked it out but I'd been getting away with fifth (7 semitones)=down, fourth(5 semitones)=up which works in almost all cases in classical music. A six semitone interval is fairly unusual and I had guessed that there would be a setting to decide which way it want \augfourdown, \augfourup or something like that. (That explains some of the apparently odd ways I've done some things in the script. Initially I was converting notes to numbers 0..11 but that's no use when you need to distinguish between Gb and F# to calculate whether a ' or , is required.) Tim. -- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light. http://www.woodall.me.uk/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: splitting chords entered as <>^"with stuff" \etc
On Monday 19 January 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > This statement is not true when trying to split relative chords and > produce parallel relative voices, because of the way lilypond works. > > The octave on the first note of a chord in relative mode is determined > by comparison with the first note of the previous chord. Back in the day that was not true. I forgot. I don't know whether it was before or after the change from <<>> to <>. It is no problem to run the very simple procedure on each first note of each chord and then on the rest of each chord before splitting, getting all of the absolute pitches. Two lines of sed, max, would get the punctuation. Then split as done already. The point is that all of the information is there, and it is not necessary to crunch the pitches in any way. It is not necessary to have any expressions of octave other than ,' and their absence. Absolute to relative might be more difficult than the opposite, but I doubt it. I haven't given that any thought. Looks as simple as subtracting from the next note instead of adding. Regards, daveA -- Free download of technical exercises worth a lifetime of practice: http://www.openguitar.com/dynamic.html You can play the cards you're dealt, or improve your hand with DGT. Very easy guitar music, solos, duets, exercises.., To contact, visit openguitar.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Whole note tremolo repeats - bug ?
hi, On Jan 18, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Werner LEMBERG wrote: Looking into the full score of Strauss's `Salome', I can confirm that (it's one bar before rehearsal number 68, page 50): the position of a whole note tremolo is exactly the same as if there were a stem. This is exactly the rule that's formulated in the book "Noter" by Börje Tyboni (comprehensive Swedish book on music notation, which usually is trustworthy) - "the position of a whole note tremolo is the same as if there were a stem". berlioz's treatise on modern instrumentation also shows the tremolos placed as if they were on a stem. see attachment or the source at http://tinyurl.com/9ovrcy (link through to google books). (berlioz may not be authoritative, but there are lots of examples of specialist notation in there). regards, sb -- Simon Bailey Oompa Loompa of Science +43 699 190 631 25 <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: splitting chords entered as <>^"with stuff" \etc
On 1/19/09 5:05 AM, "David Raleigh Arnold" wrote: > On Sunday 18 January 2009, Tim Woodall wrote: >> And, of course, I found some bugs as soon as I'd posted. >> >> Quick breakdown of how it works incase anyone really wants to hack on >> it. > Wow. I am impressed, honestly. I am not a programmer, but whether notes > are written in \relative or absolute pitch all of the information is > already present. I don't think it is necessary to do anything > but carry all "," and "'" marks to all following pitches and reduce. > > \relative --> absolute --> reduce > a, b a c ... --> a, b, a, c, ... > a,, b' a, c --> a,, b,,' a,,', c,,', --> a,, b, a,, c,, > This statement is not true when trying to split relative chords and produce parallel relative voices, because of the way lilypond works. The octave on the first note of a chord in relative mode is determined by comparison with the first note of the previous chord. The octave on successive notes in a chord is determined by comparison with the previous note in the current chord. Therefore, in order to calculate the correct absolute pitch, you need to get both the previous chord and the current chord. And if you want to split the chords into voices that use \relative mode, you need an algorithm to tell you what the octave symbol should be. The algorithm will need to know the absolute octave of the last note in the current voice, and the absolute octave of the current note in the current voice, and then make a decision on what the octave symbol should be in the current voice. > I've always thought \relative to be quicker for a single simple > melodic line, but a nightmare for anything with chords > in it, so I didn't expect that the OP was dealing with > it. If he was. I'm also not sure whether \relative is > always necessarily completely linear any more. I haven't used > it for a while. CRS. Regards, daveA > I find \relative to work quite nicely for chords, once I understood that the first note in a chord gets its octave from the first note of the previous chord. I use \relative mode virtually exclusively for note entry, regardless of whether it's in single notes or using the chord construct < >. I do use absolute when I'm in chordmode. Regards, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using ly:get-glyph, ly:font-get-glyph
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> It says that each can "Retrieve a stencil", which strikes me as >> useful. I was actually looking for a scheme-way of accessing >> stencils, but the function description is bewildering to me. > > Well, improvements are welcome :-) > >> Can I somehow use it like this... >> \once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #(ly:get-glyph font index) You can't do it this easily. The font elements within stencils must constructed correctly to correspond with scaling factors: LilyPond sets up the font sizes such that 1.0 unit of distance corresponds with a staff-space. Since this depends on \paper and \layout settings, you have to have a font as returned by (for example) ly:grob-default-font. Typically, this happens from within a grob callback. Grep for ly:font-get-glyph in the scm directory for examples. ly:get-glyph should probably be removed as it presupposes some kind of unspecified encoding. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[SOLVED] Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I installed the 64bit version - it works. It seems that suprisingly I am on a 64 bit machine :-o Thanks for all of you for the tips. Bert Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 12:20 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool): Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed, can you figure out why that's not being run by default? It IS run by default. The problem is the following: $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly Look, this is NOT /usr/local/bin/lilypond, you cannot run this. So bash says there is no such file, but stat says there is. Bash is complaining about python (or possibly another non-existent file). Yes, the error message is very confusing, please complain to bug-b...@gnu.org . I actually once looked into patching this bug but it is either quite hard (needs linux kernel patch iirc) or resource-consuming. Jan. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
It IS run by default. The problem is the following: $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly Look, this is NOT /usr/local/bin/lilypond, you cannot run this. Ok, but then why $ /usr/local/bin/lilypond says exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found ? (Now it's not bash) What is the secret dependency? How can it be found? Now I installed back 2.10.25, but it fails with the same message, it used to work before I uninstalled it. :-( Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: splitting chords entered as <>^"with stuff" \etc
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Tim Woodall wrote:
> And, of course, I found some bugs as soon as I'd posted.
>
> Quick breakdown of how it works incase anyone really wants to hack on
> it.
>
> First it splits the three parts out into three files. Basically all it
> does is remove the other two notes from inside <>. It does depend on
the
> chord all being on one line to do this. It also makes sure each chord
on a
> separate line in the output files. Note that line n in one file
> corresponds to line n in the other files as well.
>
> Next it reads in what it has written into three arrays.
>
> For each chord it then calculates the number of notes from the first
> note in the previous chord to the first note in this chord (d1) and
from
> the first note in this chord to the other two notes in this chord (d2
> and d3)
>
> It subtracts the distance from the first note of the previous chord to
> the other notes in that chord (od1 and od2). Then it calculates how
many
> octave changes are needed for each step. v1, v2 and v3.
>
> It replaces any existing ', in the chord with the values in v1,
> v2 and v3 (note that replacing v1 should be a no-op)
>
> And finally it writes the arrays back into the files it read them
from.
>
> Tim.
>
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> cat test.ly | sed 's/<[^<>a-g]*\([a-g][a-g]*[^a-g>]*\)
[^>]*>\([^<]*\)/\n<\1>\n\2/g' >part1.ly
> cat test.ly | sed 's/<[^<>a-g]*[a-g][a-g]*[^>a-g]*\([a-g]
[a-g]*[^a-g>]*\)[^>]*>\([^<]*\)/\n<\1>\n\2/g' >part2.ly
> cat test.ly | sed 's/<[^<>a-g]*[a-g][a-g]*[^>a-g]*[a-g]
[a-g]*[^>a-g]*\([a-g][a-g]*[^a-g>]*\)[^>]*>\([^<]*\)/\n<\1>\n\2/g'
>part3.ly
>
> c=0
> while read -r line; do
>line1[$c]="$line"
>c=$(($c+1))
> done < $( < part1.ly )
> EOF
>
> c=0
> while read -r line; do
>line2[$c]="$line"
>c=$(($c+1))
> done < $( < part2.ly )
> EOF
>
> c=0
> while read -r line; do
>line3[$c]="$line"
>c=$(($c+1))
> done < $( < part3.ly )
> EOF
>
> c=0
>
> note_cannonical() {
>local note
>local val=0
>local accidental=""
>local octave=0
>note=$( echo $1 | sed "s/[^a-gis',]//g" )
>
>case $note in
> a*) val=0 ;;
> b*) val=1 ;;
> c*) val=2 ;;
> d*) val=3 ;;
> e*) val=4 ;;
> f*) val=5 ;;
> g*) val=6 ;;
> *) echo "Error bad note $note"; exit 1 ;;
>esac
>note=${note#?}
>
>while [[ "$note" != "" ]]; do
> case $note in
>es*) accidental="${accidental}es"; note=${note#es} ;;
>is*) accidental="${accidental}is"; note=${note#is} ;;
>\'*) octave=$(($octave+1)); note=${note#?} ;;
>,*) octave=$(($octave-1)); note=${note#?} ;;
>*) echo "Error bad adjust $note"; exit 1 ;;
> esac
>done
>
>echo "$val:$accidental:$octave"
> }
>
> calc_delta() {
>local p1=${1%%:*}
>local p2=${2%%:*}
>local o2=${2##*:}
>local dn
>
>if [[ $p2 -gt $p1 ]]; then
> if [[ $(($p2-$p1)) -le 3 ]]; then
>dn=$(($p2-$p1))
> else
>dn=$(($p1-7-$p2))
> fi
>else
> if [[ $(($p2-$p1)) -ge -3 ]]; then
>dn=$(($p2-$p1))
> else
>dn=$((7-$p1+$p2))
> fi
>fi
>
>dn=$(($o2*7+$dn))
>
>echo $dn
> }
>
> calcoctave() {
>local off=$1
>local n=""
>
>while [[ $off -ge 4 ]]; do
> n="${n}'"
> off=$(($off-7))
>done
>
>while [[ $off -le -4 ]]; do
> n="${n},"
> off=$(($off+7))
>done
>
>echo $n
> }
>
> note() {
>local p=${1%%:*}
>local a=${1#*:}
>local n=("a" "b" "c" "d" "e" "f" "g")
>
>echo "${n[$p]}${a%:*}"
> }
>
> replace_note() {
>local from="$1"
>local r=$2
>local innote=0
>local d
>local ret=""
>
>
>while [[ "$from" != "" ]]; do
> d=$( echo "$from" | sed "s/\(.\).*/\1/" )
> from="${from#?}"
> case $d in
>[a-g])
> if [[ $innote == 0 ]]; then
>ret="$ret$r"
>innote=1
> elif [[ $innote != 1 ]]; then
>ret="$ret$d"
> fi
> ;;
>[is\',])
> if [[ $innote != 1 ]]; then
>ret="$ret$d"
> fi
> ;;
>\ )
> ret="$ret$d"
> ;;
>*)
> if [[ $innote == 1 ]]; then
>innote=2
> fi
> ret="$ret$d"
> ;;
> esac
>done
>echo $ret
> }
>
> n1="2"
> od2=0
> od3=0
>
> while [[ $c -lt ${#line1[*]} ]]; do
>if [[ ! -z "${line1[$c]}" && "${line1[$c]#*>}" == "" && "${line1
[$c]%<*}" = "" ]]; then
> nc1=$( note_cannonical "${line1[$c]}" )
> nc2=$( note_cannonical "${line2[$c]}" )
> nc3=$( note_cannonical "${line3[$c]}" )
> echo $nc1 $nc2 $nc3
> d1=$( calc_delta $n1 $nc1 )
> d2=$(($d1 + $( calc_delta $nc1 $nc2 ) ))
> d3=$(($d2 + $( calc_delta $nc2 $nc3 ) ))
> echo $d1 $d2 $d3
> v1=$( calcoctave $d1 )
> v2=$( calcoctave $(($d2-$od2)) )
> v3=$( calcoctave $(($d3-$od3)) )
> echo $v1 $v2 $v3
> out1="$(note $nc1)$v1"
> out2="$(no
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 12:20 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool): > Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed, > > can you figure out why that's not being run by default? > > > > > It IS run by default. The problem is the following: > > $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly Look, this is NOT /usr/local/bin/lilypond, you cannot run this. > So bash says there is no such file, but stat says there is. Bash is complaining about python (or possibly another non-existent file). Yes, the error message is very confusing, please complain to bug-b...@gnu.org . I actually once looked into patching this bug but it is either quite hard (needs linux kernel patch iirc) or resource-consuming. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > It IS run by default. The problem is the following: > > $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly your output of "whereis lilypond" was /usr/local/bin/lilypond, so try $ /usr/local/bin/lilypond test.ly I have lilypond correctly installed and obtain a segfault from $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond Your executable is exactly /usr/local/bin/lilypond, and /usr/local//lilypond is not a Windows-style folder in the path where executables are. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I'm afraid we are going to speak about not the real problem. Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed, can you figure out why that's not being run by default? It IS run by default. The problem is the following: $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly bash: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: No such file or directory $ stat /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond File: `/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond' Size: 2676660 Blocks: 5240 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fd01h/64769dInode: 755793 Links: 1 Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root) Access: 2009-01-19 12:17:17.0 +0100 Modify: 2007-09-20 04:54:45.0 +0200 Change: 2009-01-19 12:16:50.0 +0100 So bash says there is no such file, but stat says there is. This is my problem to be solved. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 18:55 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham Breed: > That's weird. I see this in > ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But lilypond-book > works for me. The binary is ~/bin/lilypond-book and that > overrides the Python version. lilydev is Han-Wen. You're not supposed to run PREFIX/lilypond/bin/lilypond directly, so having a nonexistent python location after the #! should not be a problem (though I think this has been fixed in gub3). The idea is to run PREFIX/bin/lilypond (or PREFIX/bin/lilypond-book) which wrap the raw executables, taking care of LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or python/guile interpreter locations. You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed, can you figure out why that's not being run by default? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python Your system has a lilydev user you are not aware of. From my poor knowledge of install internals, it seems that the lilydev user has previously installed lilypond system-wide from a gub compile. No, actually there are two lilypond-book scripts. One is just an sh wrapper for the python script. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > I don't really want to update the kernel if it is not a must. (There are > many services running on the server.) I only meant that fresh installs of lilypond work perfectly on fresh installs of Ubuntu. Any further changes to the PATH or whatever could produce problems. > The output of the installer script is: > > Making /usr/local/lilypond/ > Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond > Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python > Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile > Creating script /usr/local/bin/uninstall-lilypond > Untarring lilypond-2.12.1-1.linux-x86.sh > To uninstall lilypond, run... This shows a successful install, but if /usr/local/bin is not in your $ echo $PATH output, indeed the executable is not found. (do not post that output here). -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Graham Breed : > Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: > >> No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: >> >> #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python > > That's weird. I see this in ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But > lilypond-book works for me. The binary is ~/bin/lilypond-book and that > overrides the Python version. I have #!/bin/sh export PYTHONPATH="/usr/local/lilypond/usr/lib/lilypond/current/python/:/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/python/:$PYTHONPATH" as the first two lines of /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book. If you are trying to install and use a system-wide lilypond as root, you should not have a working lilypond binary in ~/bin and in the PATH at the same time. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: > > #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python Your system has a lilydev user you are not aware of. From my poor knowledge of install internals, it seems that the lilydev user has previously installed lilypond system-wide from a gub compile. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Oh, then that's alright like that. I hope I don't have to upgrade the ubuntu installation. I don't want to start wandering in dependency hell. Graham Breed wrote: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python That's weird. I see this in ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But lilypond-book works for me. The binary is ~/bin/lilypond-book and that overrides the Python version. Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python That's weird. I see this in ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But lilypond-book works for me. The binary is ~/bin/lilypond-book and that overrides the Python version. Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Graham Breed wrote: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book: */home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/*tools/root/usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory It perhaps is related. What's this "lilydev"? Is that you? It looks like you're getting the version you installed mixed up with a development copy you have. Note: the executable file you run is a shell script. Look at it and it'll tell you the library path it's using. Graham No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line: #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I don't really want to update the kernel if it is not a must. (There are many services running on the server.) The output of the installer script is: Making /usr/local/lilypond/ Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile Creating script /usr/local/bin/uninstall-lilypond Untarring lilypond-2.12.1-1.linux-x86.sh To uninstall lilypond, run /usr/local//bin/uninstall-lilypond For license and warranty information, consult /usr/local/lilypond/license/README Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well. Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine? Afaik the machine is 32-bit as well, its an Intel P4. Linux version 2.6.17-12-generic (r...@king) (gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)) #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:39:38 UTC 2007 (Ubuntu 2.6.17-12.41-generic) latest Ubuntu comes with version 2.6.27-9 of the Linux kernel. Anyway, the distributed installer has always worked for me, so I'd recommend you to uninstall it again, purge any old version and try to install it from scratch. From your output of lilypond-book I infer that the install did not success, because lilypond comes with a Python inside, if I'm not wrong. Please post the output of the installing command. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I am root. Francisco Vila wrote: Bertalan, it is possible that sudo sh lilypond---etc does not work for an user without privileges. Only users who are in the sudoers file can issue sudo commands. Try again as the privileged user (the first you created on install of Ubuntu) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Bertalan, it is possible that sudo sh lilypond---etc does not work for an user without privileges. Only users who are in the sudoers file can issue sudo commands. Try again as the privileged user (the first you created on install of Ubuntu) -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > >> If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well. >> >> Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine? >> > > Afaik the machine is 32-bit as well, its an Intel P4. > > Linux version 2.6.17-12-generic (r...@king) (gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 > (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)) #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:39:38 UTC 2007 > (Ubuntu 2.6.17-12.41-generic) latest Ubuntu comes with version 2.6.27-9 of the Linux kernel. Anyway, the distributed installer has always worked for me, so I'd recommend you to uninstall it again, purge any old version and try to install it from scratch. >From your output of lilypond-book I infer that the install did not success, because lilypond comes with a Python inside, if I'm not wrong. Please post the output of the installing command. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:30:42AM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: > I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very > strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve. > I used the script to install: > > sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh > > /Then I try to run lilypond: > lilypond test.ly > > and I get: > > exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found > > But the file is actually there: Strange location for an executable ?? I think something has gone wrong somewhere. did you try export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin before running lilypond test.ly ? /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin is problably not in the PATH environment variable. I don't know the install script, but normal places to intall an executable like lilypond are /usr/bin/ or /usr/local/bin ?? -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book: */home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/*tools/root/usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory It perhaps is related. What's this "lilydev"? Is that you? It looks like you're getting the version you installed mixed up with a development copy you have. Note: the executable file you run is a shell script. Look at it and it'll tell you the library path it's using. Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". I obtain another message. $ lilypond unexisting.ly GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 warning: cannot find file: `unexisting.ly' error: failed files: "unexisting.ly" Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book: /home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory It perhaps is related. I have it in another path. $ whereis lilypond-book lilypond-book: /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book For me: /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book exec: 6: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/python: not found ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > > I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says > that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". I obtain another message. $ lilypond unexisting.ly GNU LilyPond 2.12.1 warning: cannot find file: `unexisting.ly' error: failed files: "unexisting.ly" > > Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book: > > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book > bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book: > /home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No > such file or directory > > It perhaps is related. I have it in another path. $ whereis lilypond-book lilypond-book: /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well. Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine? Afaik the machine is 32-bit as well, its an Intel P4. Linux version 2.6.17-12-generic (r...@king) (gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)) #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:39:38 UTC 2007 (Ubuntu 2.6.17-12.41-generic) Have you installed the 32-bit or the 64-bit lilypond binary? 32. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > Francisco Vila wrote: >> What's the output of "whereis lilypond" ? > > > lilypond: /usr/local/bin/lilypond /usr/local/lilypond same as mine. >> Did you have the lilypond package previously installed from the > standard repositories? > > No, IIRC I used the installer script for 2.10. Before installing 2.11 I > uninstalled it. If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well. Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine? Have you installed the 32-bit or the 64-bit lilypond binary? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book: */home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/*tools/root/usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory It perhaps is related. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve. I used the script to install: sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh I did a local install, and it works fine as ~/bin/lilypond and so on for the other applications. This seems to be the way to go so that I can keep the "stable" version from the repository. Maybe it'll still work for you. (Actually, it seems to be the default now, but never mind.) /Then I try to run lilypond: lilypond test.ly and I get: exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found". But the file is actually there: stat /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond File: `/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond' Size: 3586224 Blocks: 7016 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fd01h/64769dInode: 755771 Links: 1 Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root) Access: 2009-01-19 10:24:01.0 +0100 Modify: 2008-12-31 19:13:22.0 +0100 Change: 2009-01-19 10:23:10.0 +0100 That's the right file. Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Trying to start once again...
I find this confusing, so many cloned menus, furthermore when they _do not_ bring you directly to the LilyPondTool options. Also the name is not consistent. Multiple names LilyPondTool, LilyTool, Lily4jEdit, are confusing for novices. Bertalan: when you have the time, please put some order on this all. At least for me as a teacher, I always have to explain all these inconsistencies so that my pupils do not get lost. Yes. All of that is true. Unfortunately my original name was not too good. I could hardly change that because, sourceforge doesn't allow changing the name from lily4jedit, and I don't want to change the package and class names from LilyTool to LilyPondTool. But regarding the menus it would not be very hard to make it consistent. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve. I used the script to install: sudo sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh I hope this is not the exact command you issued. No, it's not :-) Then I try to run lilypond: lilypond test.ly and I get: exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found What's the output of "whereis lilypond" ? lilypond: /usr/local/bin/lilypond /usr/local/lilypond But the file is actually there: stat /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond File: `/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond' Did you have the lilypond package previously installed from the standard repositories? No, IIRC I used the installer script for 2.10. Before installing 2.11 I uninstalled it. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) : > I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very > strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve. > I used the script to install: > > sudo sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh I hope this is not the exact command you issued. > > Then I try to run lilypond: > lilypond test.ly > > and I get: > > exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found What's the output of "whereis lilypond" ? > > But the file is actually there: > > stat /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond > > File: `/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond' Did you have the lilypond package previously installed from the standard repositories? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Thin bars
These links show already filed bugs on the issue. I am completely sure that I myself filed a bug on poppler or libpoppler regarding to the lilypond barlines, but I cannot find the URL despite of having been searching for half an hour now. Poppler is the PDF rendering library of evince, if I'm not wrong. The bug is annoying because evince is the default document viewer in Ubuntu and printed LilyPond scores are very ugly even on high-resolution printers (or monitors!) when printed (or viewed!) with evince. [Bug 247113] [NEW] vertical bars are too thick http://www.archivum.info/ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com/2008-07/msg10441.html vertical bars are too thick https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/247113 -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ubuntu can't find lilypond executable
I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve. I used the script to install: sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh /Then I try to run lilypond: lilypond test.ly and I get: exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found But the file is actually there: stat /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond File: `/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond' Size: 3586224 Blocks: 7016 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fd01h/64769dInode: 755771 Links: 1 Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root) Access: 2009-01-19 10:24:01.0 +0100 Modify: 2008-12-31 19:13:22.0 +0100 Change: 2009-01-19 10:23:10.0 +0100 Could you please help me on this? Thanks, Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using ly:get-glyph, ly:font-get-glyph
> It says that each can "Retrieve a stencil", which strikes me as > useful. I was actually looking for a scheme-way of accessing > stencils, but the function description is bewildering to me. Well, improvements are welcome :-) > Can I somehow use it like this... > \once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #(ly:get-glyph font index) > ? > > Is font a string, symbol, or an actual font? > Is index a number? How do I know what number > a particular glyph is? How does this work??? > > None of these seemed to work (don't laugh, but > I'm seriously stabbing in the dark here): > (ly:font-get-glyph 'Emmentaler '"Half notehead") You can't directly access the font name, it seems. Look at the definition of the `musicglyph' markup command in define-markup-commands.scm which uses ly:paper-get-font to get a font handle for ly:font-get-glyph. I assume the same is true for ly:get-glyph -- there is no example code in lilypond which uses this function (which is, admittedly, not very useful in general). Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Thin bars
Johan Vromans writes: > This definitely looks like the problem discussed here earlier. See message and thread. http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/lpev.png shows an example. -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Thin bars
Fibonacci Prower writes: > Well, I just tried printing it, and the bars look even worse - not > only are they too thick, they also seem to be a bit too long, so that > they go beyond the limits of the staff on both sides This definitely looks like the problem discussed here earlier. Did you try different programs to print with? -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Trying to start once again...
2009/1/18 Michael Falkenburg : > Francisco Vila wrote: >> Configure LilyPondTool so that the path to the lilypond executable is >> /usr/local/bin >> > > Where do I do this? > Go to the menu Plugins -> LilyPondTool -> Development -> LilyTool Options, the go to the "LilyPondTool -> General" section on the left pane, you'll see something like "Path to the executable" . Or go to the menu Plugins->Plugin Options Or push the "LilyPond > " button in the LilyPondTool toolbar, then go to Development, etc. I find this confusing, so many cloned menus, furthermore when they _do not_ bring you directly to the LilyPondTool options. Also the name is not consistent. Multiple names LilyPondTool, LilyTool, Lily4jEdit, are confusing for novices. Bertalan: when you have the time, please put some order on this all. At least for me as a teacher, I always have to explain all these inconsistencies so that my pupils do not get lost. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \skip substitute in lyrics?
Op zondag 18 januari 2009, schreef Kieren MacMillan:
> Of course, there are more complicated ways as well (using \set
> associatedVoice, etc.).
That would be starting a new lyrics context at the desired moment:
\score {
<<
\new Staff \new Voice = "mel" \relative c' {
c d e f g f e d
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "mel" {
ha ha ha ha
<<
{ ha ha ha ha }
\new Lyrics {
\set associatedVoice = "mel"
ho ho ho ho
}
>>
}
>>
}
[btw: it would be nice if the new Lyrics context would inherit its
associatedvoice from its parent context. It would then not be necessary to
write the \set associatedVoice command.]
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
