Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-15 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
Of course; just wanted to track progress and see if you still needed access
to a windows install to debug. Many thanks!

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022, 01:19 Jean Abou Samra  wrote:

> Le 15/06/2022 à 06:10, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
> > Hi, has an issue been created for this problem? I don't see one in
> gitlab.
>
>
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6361
>
>
> > Any progress in identifying the cause?
>
>
> It happens that yes, but I would like to remind that everyone in this
> project is a volunteer and thus you shouldn't expect fixes within days.
> 2.23 is a unstable release series after all. If things do not work,
> please downgrade to 2.22.
>
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
>


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-14 Thread Jean Abou Samra

Le 15/06/2022 à 06:10, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :

Hi, has an issue been created for this problem? I don't see one in gitlab.



https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6361



Any progress in identifying the cause?



It happens that yes, but I would like to remind that everyone in this
project is a volunteer and thus you shouldn't expect fixes within days.
2.23 is a unstable release series after all. If things do not work,
please downgrade to 2.22.

Thanks,
Jean




Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-14 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
Hi, has an issue been created for this problem? I don't see one in gitlab.
Any progress in identifying the cause?

Thanks,

-Ahanu


On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 7:52 AM David Kastrup  wrote:

> Paul Hodges  writes:
>
> > From:   Paul Hodges 
> >
> > From: David Kastrup 
> > Try deleting
> >
> > C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go
> >
> > which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea
> > why).
> >
> > That fixed it.
> >
> > Actually, it fixed the compiled cache error, but I still have
> >
> >
> >
> > ERROR: In procedure apply-smob/1:
> > Wrong number of arguments to #
> > Exited with return code 1.
> >
> > The reason I didn't realise before is that the run that I had done
> > after deleting the cache  spent a long time twiddling its thumbs with
> > Frescobaldi's progress bar at 100% before giving the -1073741819
> > error.  It would appear that the -1073741819 error was triggered
> > before the code giving this boot-closure error.
>
> Ok, it was worth a try.  With a mismatch of that precompiled file (for
> whatever reason) to the version of Guile, this would have been a
> possible cause for the problem.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Hodges  writes:

> From:   Paul Hodges  
>
> From: David Kastrup  
> Try deleting 
>
> C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go 
>
> which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea 
> why). 
>
> That fixed it.
>
> Actually, it fixed the compiled cache error, but I still have
>
>
>
> ERROR: In procedure apply-smob/1: 
> Wrong number of arguments to # 
> Exited with return code 1.
>
> The reason I didn't realise before is that the run that I had done
> after deleting the cache  spent a long time twiddling its thumbs with
> Frescobaldi's progress bar at 100% before giving the -1073741819
> error.  It would appear that the -1073741819 error was triggered
> before the code giving this boot-closure error.

Ok, it was worth a try.  With a mismatch of that precompiled file (for
whatever reason) to the version of Guile, this would have been a
possible cause for the problem.

-- 
David Kastrup



Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Paul Hodges

From:   Jean Abou Samra  
Does it look deterministic when the error is in "Preprocessing graphical  
objects...", i.e. does it happen every time? 

In my case the error is always after the GLib errors which follow the "Drawing 
Systems" message.


(Except in the case of 2.23.6, which appears not to output progress messages - 
and gives a different error also after the GLib error


This is getting a bit tricky to understand without experimenting. Would  
any of you both accept to give me a VNC access over your machine so I  
can do my own tests without this email ping-pong? 

Contact me privately; my wife might like me to have a reason to be away from my 
desk for a while!



Paul



Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Paul Hodges

From:   Paul Hodges  

From: David Kastrup  
Try deleting 

C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go 

which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea 
why). 

That fixed it.

Actually, it fixed the compiled cache error, but I still have



ERROR: In procedure apply-smob/1: 
Wrong number of arguments to # 
Exited with return code 1.

The reason I didn't realise before is that the run that I had done after 
deleting the cache  spent a long time twiddling its thumbs with Frescobaldi's 
progress bar at 100% before giving the -1073741819 error.  It would appear that 
the -1073741819 error was triggered before the code giving this boot-closure 
error.


Paul





Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Paul Hodges
From: David Kastrup  
Try deleting 

C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go 

which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea 
why). 

That fixed it.


 From:   Jean Abou Samra  

Which is the one you were able to run? For 2.23.6, the binaries from  
GitLab use Guile 2, while the ones from lilypond.org use Guile 1. 
 
This is clear-cut.  Running 2.23.6 from lilypond.org I could not provoke the 
problem in two dozen runs (the maximum I got clear with 2.23.9 was one dozen 
runs), but my first run with 2.23.6 from GitLab displayed it.  I see no need to 
go back to 2.23.5 or 2.23.4.




Paul

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Jean Abou Samra




Le 10/06/2022 à 08:29, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :

Sorry for the extra emails.

With all the engravers removed, as previously stated, it proceeds to 
"Preprocessing graphical elements..." before giving code -1073741819.


The following engravers, when individually enabled (i.e., commenting 
out the single "\remove" line), cause the problem to occur during 
"Interpreting music..." prior to "Preprocessing graphical objects...":


Score:
System_start_delimiter_engraver
Spacing_engraver
Vertical_align_engraver

Staff
Ledger_line_engraver
Staff_symbol_engraver
Figured_bass_engraver

None of the engravers in Voice cause the problem, even when they are 
all enabled.
If I enable all the engravers under Staff except the 3 that cause the 
problem individually, I still get -1073741819.


That's all the testing I can do tonight, as it's late here. I'd be 
happy to continue tomorrow.



Does it look deterministic when the error is in "Preprocessing graphical 
objects...", i.e. does it happen every time?


This is getting a bit tricky to understand without experimenting. Would 
any of you both accept to give me a VNC access over your machine so I 
can do my own tests without this email ping-pong?


Jean




Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
Sorry for the extra emails.

With all the engravers removed, as previously stated, it proceeds to
"Preprocessing graphical elements..." before giving code -1073741819.

The following engravers, when individually enabled (i.e., commenting out
the single "\remove" line), cause the problem to occur during "Interpreting
music..." prior to "Preprocessing graphical objects...":

Score:
System_start_delimiter_engraver
Spacing_engraver
Vertical_align_engraver

Staff
Ledger_line_engraver
Staff_symbol_engraver
Figured_bass_engraver

None of the engravers in Voice cause the problem, even when they are all
enabled.
If I enable all the engravers under Staff except the 3 that cause the
problem individually, I still get -1073741819.

That's all the testing I can do tonight, as it's late here. I'd be happy to
continue tomorrow.

Cheers,
-Ahanu


On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:06 AM Ahanu Banerjee  wrote:

> System_start_delimiter_engraver causes it to fail earlier, during
> "Interpreting music...".
>
> -Ahanu
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:01 AM Ahanu Banerjee  wrote:
>
>> In 2.23.9, using the code you (Jean) pasted in your last email, I get the
>> following output:
>>
>> Starting lilypond.exe 2.23.9 [Untitled]...
>> Processing `C:/Users/[...]/document.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting music...
>> Preprocessing graphical objects...
>> Exited with return code -1073741819.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ahanu Banerjee 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will give it a try.
>>>
>>> -Ahanu
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022, 01:31 Jean Abou Samra  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 10/06/2022 à 02:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
>>>> > I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but
>>>> > 2.23.8 and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9.
>>>> > So far, I have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.
>>>> >
>>>> > I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the
>>>> > following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:
>>>> >
>>>> > \version "2.23.9"
>>>> >
>>>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }
>>>> >
>>>> > This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:
>>>> >
>>>> > \version "2.23.7"
>>>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, bear with me. There's one thing you can do to help. The error occurs
>>>> in "Processing music", right? Try compiling this:
>>>>
>>>> \version "2.23.9"
>>>>
>>>> \layout {
>>>>\context {
>>>>  \Score
>>>>  \remove Mark_tracking_translator
>>>>  \remove Paper_column_engraver
>>>>  \remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
>>>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>>>  \remove Timing_translator
>>>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>>>  \remove Tweak_engraver
>>>>  \remove Spanner_tracking_engraver
>>>>  \remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
>>>>  \remove Mark_engraver
>>>>  \remove Jump_engraver
>>>>  \remove Volta_engraver
>>>>  \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
>>>>  \remove Break_align_engraver
>>>>  \remove Spacing_engraver
>>>>  \remove Grace_spacing_engraver
>>>>  \remove Vertical_align_engraver
>>>>  \remove Stanza_number_align_engraver
>>>>  \remove Bar_number_engraver
>>>>  \remove Parenthesis_engraver
>>>>  \remove Concurrent_hairpin_engraver
>>>>  \remove Beam_collision_engraver
>>>>  \remove Footnote_engraver
>>>>  \remove Centered_bar_number_align_engraver
>>>>  \remove Show_control_points_engraver
>>>>}
>>>>\context {
>>>>  \Staff
>>>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>>>  \remove Skip_typesetting_engraver
>>>>  \remove Bar_engraver
>>>>  \remove Pure_from_neighbor_engraver
>>>>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>>>>  \remove Separating_line_group_engraver
>>>>  \remove Dot_column_engraver
>>>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>>>  \remove Ottava_spanner_engr

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
System_start_delimiter_engraver causes it to fail earlier, during
"Interpreting music...".

-Ahanu


On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:01 AM Ahanu Banerjee  wrote:

> In 2.23.9, using the code you (Jean) pasted in your last email, I get the
> following output:
>
> Starting lilypond.exe 2.23.9 [Untitled]...
> Processing `C:/Users/[...]/document.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ahanu Banerjee  wrote:
>
>> I will give it a try.
>>
>> -Ahanu
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022, 01:31 Jean Abou Samra  wrote:
>>
>>> Le 10/06/2022 à 02:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
>>> > I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but
>>> > 2.23.8 and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9.
>>> > So far, I have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.
>>> >
>>> > I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the
>>> > following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:
>>> >
>>> > \version "2.23.9"
>>> >
>>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }
>>> >
>>> > This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:
>>> >
>>> > \version "2.23.7"
>>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, bear with me. There's one thing you can do to help. The error occurs
>>> in "Processing music", right? Try compiling this:
>>>
>>> \version "2.23.9"
>>>
>>> \layout {
>>>\context {
>>>  \Score
>>>  \remove Mark_tracking_translator
>>>  \remove Paper_column_engraver
>>>  \remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
>>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>>  \remove Timing_translator
>>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>>  \remove Tweak_engraver
>>>  \remove Spanner_tracking_engraver
>>>  \remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
>>>  \remove Mark_engraver
>>>  \remove Jump_engraver
>>>  \remove Volta_engraver
>>>  \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
>>>  \remove Break_align_engraver
>>>  \remove Spacing_engraver
>>>  \remove Grace_spacing_engraver
>>>  \remove Vertical_align_engraver
>>>  \remove Stanza_number_align_engraver
>>>  \remove Bar_number_engraver
>>>  \remove Parenthesis_engraver
>>>  \remove Concurrent_hairpin_engraver
>>>  \remove Beam_collision_engraver
>>>  \remove Footnote_engraver
>>>  \remove Centered_bar_number_align_engraver
>>>  \remove Show_control_points_engraver
>>>}
>>>\context {
>>>  \Staff
>>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>>  \remove Skip_typesetting_engraver
>>>  \remove Bar_engraver
>>>  \remove Pure_from_neighbor_engraver
>>>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>>>  \remove Separating_line_group_engraver
>>>  \remove Dot_column_engraver
>>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>>  \remove Ottava_spanner_engraver
>>>  \remove Clef_engraver
>>>  \remove Key_engraver
>>>  \remove Time_signature_engraver
>>>  \remove Ledger_line_engraver
>>>  \remove Staff_symbol_engraver
>>>  \remove Collision_engraver
>>>  \remove Grob_pq_engraver
>>>  \remove Rest_collision_engraver
>>>  \remove Accidental_engraver
>>>  \remove Piano_pedal_engraver
>>>  \remove Piano_pedal_align_engraver
>>>  \remove Instrument_name_engraver
>>>  \remove Axis_group_engraver
>>>  \remove Figured_bass_engraver
>>>  \remove Figured_bass_position_engraver
>>>  \remove Script_row_engraver
>>>  \remove Cue_clef_engraver
>>>  \remove Fingering_column_engraver
>>>  \remove Merge_mmrest_numbers_engraver
>>>  \remove Alteration_glyph_engraver
>>>}
>>>\context {
>>>\Voice
>>>  \remove Grace_engraver
>>>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>>>  \remove Pitched_trill_engraver
>>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>>  \remove Arpeggio_engraver
>>>  \remove Multi_measure_rest_engrav

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-10 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
In 2.23.9, using the code you (Jean) pasted in your last email, I get the
following output:

Starting lilypond.exe 2.23.9 [Untitled]...
Processing `C:/Users/[...]/document.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Exited with return code -1073741819.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ahanu Banerjee  wrote:

> I will give it a try.
>
> -Ahanu
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022, 01:31 Jean Abou Samra  wrote:
>
>> Le 10/06/2022 à 02:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
>> > I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but
>> > 2.23.8 and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9.
>> > So far, I have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.
>> >
>> > I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the
>> > following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:
>> >
>> > \version "2.23.9"
>> >
>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }
>> >
>> > This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:
>> >
>> > \version "2.23.7"
>> > { \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> OK, bear with me. There's one thing you can do to help. The error occurs
>> in "Processing music", right? Try compiling this:
>>
>> \version "2.23.9"
>>
>> \layout {
>>\context {
>>  \Score
>>  \remove Mark_tracking_translator
>>  \remove Paper_column_engraver
>>  \remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>  \remove Timing_translator
>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>  \remove Tweak_engraver
>>  \remove Spanner_tracking_engraver
>>  \remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
>>  \remove Mark_engraver
>>  \remove Jump_engraver
>>  \remove Volta_engraver
>>  \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
>>  \remove Break_align_engraver
>>  \remove Spacing_engraver
>>  \remove Grace_spacing_engraver
>>  \remove Vertical_align_engraver
>>  \remove Stanza_number_align_engraver
>>  \remove Bar_number_engraver
>>  \remove Parenthesis_engraver
>>  \remove Concurrent_hairpin_engraver
>>  \remove Beam_collision_engraver
>>  \remove Footnote_engraver
>>  \remove Centered_bar_number_align_engraver
>>  \remove Show_control_points_engraver
>>}
>>\context {
>>  \Staff
>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>  \remove Skip_typesetting_engraver
>>  \remove Bar_engraver
>>  \remove Pure_from_neighbor_engraver
>>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>>  \remove Separating_line_group_engraver
>>  \remove Dot_column_engraver
>>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>>  \remove Ottava_spanner_engraver
>>  \remove Clef_engraver
>>  \remove Key_engraver
>>  \remove Time_signature_engraver
>>  \remove Ledger_line_engraver
>>  \remove Staff_symbol_engraver
>>  \remove Collision_engraver
>>  \remove Grob_pq_engraver
>>  \remove Rest_collision_engraver
>>  \remove Accidental_engraver
>>  \remove Piano_pedal_engraver
>>  \remove Piano_pedal_align_engraver
>>  \remove Instrument_name_engraver
>>  \remove Axis_group_engraver
>>  \remove Figured_bass_engraver
>>  \remove Figured_bass_position_engraver
>>  \remove Script_row_engraver
>>  \remove Cue_clef_engraver
>>  \remove Fingering_column_engraver
>>  \remove Merge_mmrest_numbers_engraver
>>  \remove Alteration_glyph_engraver
>>}
>>\context {
>>\Voice
>>  \remove Grace_engraver
>>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>>  \remove Pitched_trill_engraver
>>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>>  \remove Arpeggio_engraver
>>  \remove Multi_measure_rest_engraver
>>  \remove Text_spanner_engraver
>>  \remove Trill_spanner_engraver
>>  \remove Grob_pq_engraver
>>  \remove Forbid_line_break_engraver
>>  \remove Laissez_vibrer_engraver
>>  \remove Repeat_tie_engraver
>>  \remove Note_head_line_engraver
>>  \remove Glissando_engraver
>>  \remove Ligature_bracket_engraver
>>  \remove Breathing_sign_engraver
>>  \remove Note_heads_engraver
>>  \remove Dots_engraver
>>  \remove Rest_engraver
>>  \remove Stem_engraver
>>  \remove Beam_engraver

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
I will give it a try.

-Ahanu

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022, 01:31 Jean Abou Samra  wrote:

> Le 10/06/2022 à 02:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
> > I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but
> > 2.23.8 and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9.
> > So far, I have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.
> >
> > I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the
> > following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:
> >
> > \version "2.23.9"
> >
> > { \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }
> >
> > This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:
> >
> > \version "2.23.7"
> > { \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }
> >
>
>
>
> OK, bear with me. There's one thing you can do to help. The error occurs
> in "Processing music", right? Try compiling this:
>
> \version "2.23.9"
>
> \layout {
>\context {
>  \Score
>  \remove Mark_tracking_translator
>  \remove Paper_column_engraver
>  \remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>  \remove Timing_translator
>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>  \remove Tweak_engraver
>  \remove Spanner_tracking_engraver
>  \remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
>  \remove Mark_engraver
>  \remove Jump_engraver
>  \remove Volta_engraver
>  \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
>  \remove Break_align_engraver
>  \remove Spacing_engraver
>  \remove Grace_spacing_engraver
>  \remove Vertical_align_engraver
>  \remove Stanza_number_align_engraver
>  \remove Bar_number_engraver
>  \remove Parenthesis_engraver
>  \remove Concurrent_hairpin_engraver
>  \remove Beam_collision_engraver
>  \remove Footnote_engraver
>  \remove Centered_bar_number_align_engraver
>  \remove Show_control_points_engraver
>}
>\context {
>  \Staff
>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>  \remove Skip_typesetting_engraver
>  \remove Bar_engraver
>  \remove Pure_from_neighbor_engraver
>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>  \remove Separating_line_group_engraver
>  \remove Dot_column_engraver
>  \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
>  \remove Ottava_spanner_engraver
>  \remove Clef_engraver
>  \remove Key_engraver
>  \remove Time_signature_engraver
>  \remove Ledger_line_engraver
>  \remove Staff_symbol_engraver
>  \remove Collision_engraver
>  \remove Grob_pq_engraver
>  \remove Rest_collision_engraver
>  \remove Accidental_engraver
>  \remove Piano_pedal_engraver
>  \remove Piano_pedal_align_engraver
>  \remove Instrument_name_engraver
>  \remove Axis_group_engraver
>  \remove Figured_bass_engraver
>  \remove Figured_bass_position_engraver
>  \remove Script_row_engraver
>  \remove Cue_clef_engraver
>  \remove Fingering_column_engraver
>  \remove Merge_mmrest_numbers_engraver
>  \remove Alteration_glyph_engraver
>}
>\context {
>\Voice
>  \remove Grace_engraver
>  \remove Font_size_engraver
>  \remove Pitched_trill_engraver
>  \remove Output_property_engraver
>  \remove Arpeggio_engraver
>  \remove Multi_measure_rest_engraver
>  \remove Text_spanner_engraver
>  \remove Trill_spanner_engraver
>  \remove Grob_pq_engraver
>  \remove Forbid_line_break_engraver
>  \remove Laissez_vibrer_engraver
>  \remove Repeat_tie_engraver
>  \remove Note_head_line_engraver
>  \remove Glissando_engraver
>  \remove Ligature_bracket_engraver
>  \remove Breathing_sign_engraver
>  \remove Note_heads_engraver
>  \remove Dots_engraver
>  \remove Rest_engraver
>  \remove Stem_engraver
>  \remove Beam_engraver
>  \remove Grace_beam_engraver
>  \remove Auto_beam_engraver
>  \remove Grace_auto_beam_engraver
>  \remove New_fingering_engraver
>  \remove Chord_tremolo_engraver
>  \remove Double_percent_repeat_engraver
>  \remove Percent_repeat_engraver
>  \remove Slash_repeat_engraver
>  \remove Part_combine_engraver
>  \remove Text_engraver
>  \remove Dynamic_engraver
>  \remove Dynamic_align_engraver
>  \remove Fingering_engraver
>  \remove Bend_engraver
>  \remove Finger_glide_engraver
>  \remove Script_engraver
>  \remove Script_column_engraver
>  \remove Rhythmic_column_engraver
>  \remove Note_spacing_engraver
>  \remove Spanner_break_forbid_engraver
>  \remove Phrasing_slur_engraver
>  \remove Cluster_spanner_engraver
>  \remove Slur_engraver
>  \remove Tie_engraver
>  \remove Tuplet_engraver
>  \remove Instrument_switch_engraver
>}
> }
>
>
> { \repeat unfold 2 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }
>
>
> With this, I'm getting a crash because too many fundamental engravers
> are removed (in particular Paper_column_engraver), but not a GC error,
> and 'Processing music...' completes.
>
> - Does it give the 

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra




Le 10/06/2022 à 01:35, Paul Hodges a écrit :

It's late now, so I'll leave that till tomorrow.

But I found the mingw installer for 2.23.6 instead, and using that I 
cannot invoke the crash at issue.  So from my tests the problem first 
arises with 2.23.7.


Paul



Which is the one you were able to run? For 2.23.6, the binaries from 
GitLab use Guile 2, while the ones from lilypond.org use Guile 1.





Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra

Le 10/06/2022 à 02:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but 
2.23.8 and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9. 
So far, I have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.


I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the 
following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:


\version "2.23.9"

{ \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }

This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:

\version "2.23.7"
{ \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }





OK, bear with me. There's one thing you can do to help. The error occurs
in "Processing music", right? Try compiling this:

\version "2.23.9"

\layout {
  \context {
    \Score
    \remove Mark_tracking_translator
    \remove Paper_column_engraver
    \remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
    \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
    \remove Timing_translator
    \remove Output_property_engraver
    \remove Tweak_engraver
    \remove Spanner_tracking_engraver
    \remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
    \remove Mark_engraver
    \remove Jump_engraver
    \remove Volta_engraver
    \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
    \remove Break_align_engraver
    \remove Spacing_engraver
    \remove Grace_spacing_engraver
    \remove Vertical_align_engraver
    \remove Stanza_number_align_engraver
    \remove Bar_number_engraver
    \remove Parenthesis_engraver
    \remove Concurrent_hairpin_engraver
    \remove Beam_collision_engraver
    \remove Footnote_engraver
    \remove Centered_bar_number_align_engraver
    \remove Show_control_points_engraver
  }
  \context {
    \Staff
    \remove Output_property_engraver
    \remove Skip_typesetting_engraver
    \remove Bar_engraver
    \remove Pure_from_neighbor_engraver
    \remove Font_size_engraver
    \remove Separating_line_group_engraver
    \remove Dot_column_engraver
    \remove Staff_collecting_engraver
    \remove Ottava_spanner_engraver
    \remove Clef_engraver
    \remove Key_engraver
    \remove Time_signature_engraver
    \remove Ledger_line_engraver
    \remove Staff_symbol_engraver
    \remove Collision_engraver
    \remove Grob_pq_engraver
    \remove Rest_collision_engraver
    \remove Accidental_engraver
    \remove Piano_pedal_engraver
    \remove Piano_pedal_align_engraver
    \remove Instrument_name_engraver
    \remove Axis_group_engraver
    \remove Figured_bass_engraver
    \remove Figured_bass_position_engraver
    \remove Script_row_engraver
    \remove Cue_clef_engraver
    \remove Fingering_column_engraver
    \remove Merge_mmrest_numbers_engraver
    \remove Alteration_glyph_engraver
  }
  \context {
  \Voice
    \remove Grace_engraver
    \remove Font_size_engraver
    \remove Pitched_trill_engraver
    \remove Output_property_engraver
    \remove Arpeggio_engraver
    \remove Multi_measure_rest_engraver
    \remove Text_spanner_engraver
    \remove Trill_spanner_engraver
    \remove Grob_pq_engraver
    \remove Forbid_line_break_engraver
    \remove Laissez_vibrer_engraver
    \remove Repeat_tie_engraver
    \remove Note_head_line_engraver
    \remove Glissando_engraver
    \remove Ligature_bracket_engraver
    \remove Breathing_sign_engraver
    \remove Note_heads_engraver
    \remove Dots_engraver
    \remove Rest_engraver
    \remove Stem_engraver
    \remove Beam_engraver
    \remove Grace_beam_engraver
    \remove Auto_beam_engraver
    \remove Grace_auto_beam_engraver
    \remove New_fingering_engraver
    \remove Chord_tremolo_engraver
    \remove Double_percent_repeat_engraver
    \remove Percent_repeat_engraver
    \remove Slash_repeat_engraver
    \remove Part_combine_engraver
    \remove Text_engraver
    \remove Dynamic_engraver
    \remove Dynamic_align_engraver
    \remove Fingering_engraver
    \remove Bend_engraver
    \remove Finger_glide_engraver
    \remove Script_engraver
    \remove Script_column_engraver
    \remove Rhythmic_column_engraver
    \remove Note_spacing_engraver
    \remove Spanner_break_forbid_engraver
    \remove Phrasing_slur_engraver
    \remove Cluster_spanner_engraver
    \remove Slur_engraver
    \remove Tie_engraver
    \remove Tuplet_engraver
    \remove Instrument_switch_engraver
  }
}


{ \repeat unfold 2 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }


With this, I'm getting a crash because too many fundamental engravers
are removed (in particular Paper_column_engraver), but not a GC error,
and 'Processing music...' completes.

- Does it give the same "-1073741819" error? Or does it at least go past
  'Processing music...' without error and advance to 'Preprocessing 
graphical

  objects...' even if it crashes there?

- If it doesn't trigger the "-1073741819" error in "Processing music...",
  now try selectively commenting out some of the \remove commands and
  seeing if you can pinpoint the engraver that causes it. Thus, apply
  this process:

  Compile file.

  File gives "-1073741819" error => try removing less engravers until you
  

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
I was unable to get 2.2.6 (mingw) to run at all on my machine, but 2.23.8
and 2.23.9 have the issue.  It seems to be worse with 2.23.9. So far, I
have only experienced it once with 2.23.7.

I haven't identified any specific functions that trigger it. Even the
following example has caused the issue, though not consistently:

\version "2.23.9"

{ \repeat unfold 3000 a16 }

This triggers it fairly consistently in 2.23.9, but not in 2.23.7:

\version "2.23.7"
{ \repeat unfold 3000 c'8-3\flageolet_\markup "x" }


-Ahanu


On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 7:35 PM Paul Hodges  wrote:

> It's late now, so I'll leave that till tomorrow.
>
> But I found the mingw installer for 2.23.6 instead, and using that I
> cannot invoke the crash at issue.  So from my tests the problem first
> arises with 2.23.7.
>
> Paul
>
>
> * From: * David Kastrup 
> * To: * Paul Hodges 
> * Cc: * Jean Abou Samra , Lily Pond <
> lilypond-user@gnu.org>, Ahanu Banerjee 
> * Sent: * 10/06/2022 0:30
> * Subject: * Re: Exited with return code -1073741819
>
> Paul Hodges  writes:
>
> > From:   Jean Abou Samra 
> > Please try the bisection between versions as suggested in my first
> > email. That would be very helpful.
> >
> > 2.23.7, 8, 9 all give the error at random intervals.
> >
> >
> > I can't test 2.23.6 because it gives me the error:
> >
> >
> >
> > ;;; note: source file C:/Program
> Files/lilypond-2.23.6/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm
> > ;;;   newer than compiled C:/Program
> > Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go
>
> Try deleting
>
> C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go
>
> which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea
> why).
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Paul Hodges
It's late now, so I'll leave that till tomorrow.


But I found the mingw installer for 2.23.6 instead, and using that I cannot 
invoke the crash at issue.  So from my tests the problem first arises with 
2.23.7.


Paul



 From:   David Kastrup  
 To:   Paul Hodges  
 Cc:   Jean Abou Samra , Lily Pond , 
Ahanu Banerjee  
 Sent:   10/06/2022 0:30 
 Subject:   Re: Exited with return code -1073741819 

Paul Hodges  writes: 
 
> From:   Jean Abou Samra   
> Please try the bisection between versions as suggested in my first   
> email. That would be very helpful.  
> 
> 2.23.7, 8, 9 all give the error at random intervals. 
> 
> 
> I can't test 2.23.6 because it gives me the error: 
> 
> 
> 
> ;;; note: source file C:/Program 
> Files/lilypond-2.23.6/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm 
> ;;;       newer than compiled C:/Program 
> Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go 
 
Try deleting 
 
C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go 
 
which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea 
why). 
 
--  
David Kastrup 


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Hodges  writes:

> From:   Jean Abou Samra  
> Please try the bisection between versions as suggested in my first  
> email. That would be very helpful. 
>
> 2.23.7, 8, 9 all give the error at random intervals.
>
>
> I can't test 2.23.6 because it gives me the error:
>
>
>
> ;;; note: source file C:/Program 
> Files/lilypond-2.23.6/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm
> ;;;       newer than compiled C:/Program
> Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go

Try deleting

C:/Program Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go

which sounds like an outdated compilation cache (though I have no idea
why).

-- 
David Kastrup



Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Paul Hodges

From:   Jean Abou Samra  
Please try the bisection between versions as suggested in my first  
email. That would be very helpful. 

2.23.7, 8, 9 all give the error at random intervals.


I can't test 2.23.6 because it gives me the error:



;;; note: source file C:/Program 
Files/lilypond-2.23.6/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm
;;;       newer than compiled C:/Program 
Files/lilypond-2.23.6/lib/guile/2.2/ccache/ice-9/eval.go
ERROR: In procedure apply-smob/1:
Wrong number of arguments to #
Exited with return code 1.


I can't test 2.23.5 or 4 as there are no binaries at gitlab.com


2.23.3 is what I use routinely without problems.


Paul

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra




Le 10/06/2022 à 00:14, Paul Hodges a écrit :

*From: * Jean Abou Samra 

Le 09/06/2022 à 23:31, Paul Hodges a écrit :
> I reported this a week and a half ago, with no response.

Could you point to the message in the list archives
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/)? I may
have bad memory, but I'm not finding it. 



Oh dear, that's because it's not there!  What I do have is my mail 
server's logs showing the Gnu mail server accepting it with a 200 when 
I sent it, so it has been either lost by that server, or rejected as 
spam without telling me (good practice would reject it without a 200). 
 Anyway, my message just now has the same information.


When you say "alternate", do you see a pattern, or does it look
random?


When I was trying it, it was initially literal alternate times - but 
on a later visit it wasn't as simple - I had several runs with the 
crash before a successful one.  I haven't revisited it again, as I'm 
in the throes of finishing off my biggest project yet (like, I've now 
got about an hour's work left before the final stage of proof reading).


If there's anything I can do to help diagnose this, just let me know.



Please try the bisection between versions as suggested in my first 
email. That would be very helpful.



The LilyPond source of the project that I tested is about 33kB, 
generating 5 pages of PDF.


It's not unrelated; GLib is used by Pango, which LilyPond uses for
font
rendering. 



What I meant by unrelated is that the GLib message is referencing 
other programs on my machine, such as my password manager and others I 
can't recall - not the same program each time.   Why would that be 
happening at all?  I don't care that it's harmless, but I do care 
about what feels like intrusion - which will presumably continue even 
if the message gets suppressed again.



I'm not sure. Discovering fonts from the system is a complicated 
process. It's apparently trying to read some kind of configuration from 
the system, which raises a warning due to unrelated apps having messed 
up the configuration format, or something like that.


At any rate, there is definitely no "intrusion" on your system.

Jean




Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Paul Hodges

From:   Jean Abou Samra  
Le 09/06/2022 à 23:31, Paul Hodges a écrit : 
> I reported this a week and a half ago, with no response. 

Could you point to the message in the list archives 
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/)? I may 
have bad memory, but I'm not finding it. 

Oh dear, that's because it's not there!  What I do have is my mail server's 
logs showing the Gnu mail server accepting it with a 200 when I sent it, so it 
has been either lost by that server, or rejected as spam without telling me 
(good practice would reject it without a 200).  Anyway, my message just now has 
the same information.


When you say "alternate", do you see a pattern, or does it look random?


When I was trying it, it was initially literal alternate times - but on a later 
visit it wasn't as simple - I had several runs with the crash before a 
successful one.  I haven't revisited it again, as I'm in the throes of 
finishing off my biggest project yet (like, I've now got about an hour's work 
left before the final stage of proof reading).


If there's anything I can do to help diagnose this, just let me know.  The 
LilyPond source of the project that I tested is about 33kB, generating 5 pages 
of PDF.


It's not unrelated; GLib is used by Pango, which LilyPond uses for font  
rendering. 

What I meant by unrelated is that the GLib message is referencing other 
programs on my machine, such as my password manager and others I can't recall - 
not the same program each time.   Why would that be happening at all?  I don't 
care that it's harmless, but I do care about what feels like intrusion - which 
will presumably continue even if the message gets suppressed again.


Paul

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra

Le 09/06/2022 à 23:31, Paul Hodges a écrit :

I reported this a week and a half ago, with no response.




Could you point to the message in the list archives
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/)? I may
have bad memory, but I'm not finding it.



In my case, I moved a substantial score from 2.23.3 to 2.23.9, and found
that it would compile and give that error on alternate runs.



When you say "alternate", do you see a pattern, or does it look random?



When I decided to try updating from 2.23.3, the latest version was
2.23.8 - the first as I recall with the updated version of Guile.



Actually that was 2.23.7 (in the official binaries, some packagers like 
Homebrew did it earlier).




I read enough issues with that to wait for 2.23.9, but assumed that this
was still an issue with that update.

I simultaneously got an unrelated error message from a library, which
the library's maintainers are intending to hide.  This makes me uneasy,
because it indicates fingers being put out to totally unrelated
programs, which I would prefer an explanation for.  I attach my capture
of it.  There is a discussion at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2640 .



It's not unrelated; GLib is used by Pango, which LilyPond uses for font 
rendering.


Best,
Jean




Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Paul Hodges
I reported this a week and a half ago, with no response.

In my case, I moved a substantial score from 2.23.3 to 2.23.9, and found 
that it would compile and give that error on alternate runs.

When I decided to try updating from 2.23.3, the latest version was 
2.23.8 - the first as I recall with the updated version of Guile.  I 
read enough issues with that to wait for 2.23.9, but assumed that this 
was still an issue with that update.

I simultaneously got an unrelated error message from a library, which 
the library's maintainers are intending to hide.  This makes me uneasy, 
because it indicates fingers being put out to totally unrelated 
programs, which I would prefer an explanation for.  I attach my capture 
of it.  There is a discussion at 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2640 .

Paul

On 09/06/2022 21:49:43, "Jean Abou Samra"  wrote:

>Le 09/06/2022 à 22:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
>>Hello,
>>
>>On Windows 11, I have been using 2.22 with no problems, but 2.23.x frequently 
>>hangs after "Interpreting music..." and says "Exited with return code 
>>-1073741819". Running lilypond again will sometimes work and sometimes 
>>returns the same error. I have not been able to identify a pattern other than 
>>that larger files have this problem more frequently.
>>
>>I understand this is an access violation code, 0xC005, but I have no idea 
>>what's causing it. I don't have third-party antivirus software installed. I 
>>recently switched to Windows from Mac OS, so I'm totally inexperienced here.
>>
>>Any tips for troubleshooting?
>
>
>Ugh. This is very bad news. A flaky segfault like this with large files
>likely means a garbage collection problem. There is little you can do about
>it in your file. What you can do is help LilyPond developers find
>the bug, even though this tends to be atrociously hard, sadly.
>
>- Are you using the latest version, 2.23.9? There have been some
>   fixes in this area lately.
>
>- Can you try to "bisect" this in the 2.23 series? That is, go
>   to https://lilypond.org/old-downloads.html and take, say, LilyPond
>   2.23.5. Take a file that frequently crashes and see if the
>   error appears. If so, try earlier than 2.23.5, or later if it
>   doesn't reproduce. It would be helpful to know what specific
>   version the problem was introduced in.
>
>- What kind of scores are you typesetting? Are you using some
>   less common features of LilyPond?
>
>- Can you send a score that seems to crash frequently?
>
>Thanks,
>Jean
>
>
>
>

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Jean Abou Samra

Le 09/06/2022 à 22:17, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :

Hello,

On Windows 11, I have been using 2.22 with no problems, but 2.23.x 
frequently hangs after "Interpreting music..." and says "Exited with 
return code -1073741819". Running lilypond again will sometimes work 
and sometimes returns the same error. I have not been able to identify 
a pattern other than that larger files have this problem more frequently.


I understand this is an access violation code, 0xC005, but I have 
no idea what's causing it. I don't have third-party antivirus software 
installed. I recently switched to Windows from Mac OS, so I'm totally 
inexperienced here.


Any tips for troubleshooting?



Ugh. This is very bad news. A flaky segfault like this with large files
likely means a garbage collection problem. There is little you can do about
it in your file. What you can do is help LilyPond developers find
the bug, even though this tends to be atrociously hard, sadly.

- Are you using the latest version, 2.23.9? There have been some
  fixes in this area lately.

- Can you try to "bisect" this in the 2.23 series? That is, go
  to https://lilypond.org/old-downloads.html and take, say, LilyPond
  2.23.5. Take a file that frequently crashes and see if the
  error appears. If so, try earlier than 2.23.5, or later if it
  doesn't reproduce. It would be helpful to know what specific
  version the problem was introduced in.

- What kind of scores are you typesetting? Are you using some
  less common features of LilyPond?

- Can you send a score that seems to crash frequently?

Thanks,
Jean






Exited with return code -1073741819

2022-06-09 Thread Ahanu Banerjee
Hello,

On Windows 11, I have been using 2.22 with no problems, but 2.23.x
frequently hangs after "Interpreting music..." and says "Exited with return
code -1073741819". Running lilypond again will sometimes work and sometimes
returns the same error. I have not been able to identify a pattern other
than that larger files have this problem more frequently.

I understand this is an access violation code, 0xC005, but I have no
idea what's causing it. I don't have third-party antivirus software
installed. I recently switched to Windows from Mac OS, so I'm totally
inexperienced here.

Any tips for troubleshooting?

Thanks,
-Ahanu


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2021-06-17 Thread David Wright
On Thu 17 Jun 2021 at 16:35:57 (-0400), ming tsang wrote:
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.23.0 [trust_in_the_Lord.ly]...
> 
> Processing `C:/Users/yming
> tsang/Documents/CHOIR_2021/專心信主/trust_in_the_Lord.ly'
> 
> Parsing...
> 
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96]
> 
> Exited with return code -1073741819.

I think the best recent explanation and fix is in the thread that starts at:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-03/msg00023.html

Cheers,
David.



Exited with return code -1073741819.

2021-06-17 Thread ming tsang
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.23.0 [trust_in_the_Lord.ly]...

Processing `C:/Users/yming
tsang/Documents/CHOIR_2021/專心信主/trust_in_the_Lord.ly'

Parsing...

Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][96]

Exited with return code -1073741819.


Dear Lily Ponders,

I am trying to transpose a score with 136 bars. It was fine until bar 95. I
then code bar 96 and suddenly the error "Exited with return code
-1073741819." occurs.

When I remove bar 96 and it compile without error. I double checked bar 96,
there is no lilypond code error.

I need help to resolve this. Thanks in advance.
ming (lyndon) tsang
\version "2.23.0"
\language "english"

\header {
  title = "專 心 信 主"
  subtitle = "Trust In The Lord"
}

global = {
  \key c \major
  \numericTimeSignature
  \time 3/4
  \tempo "Moderately" 4=90
}

eVar =
#(define-music-function (xx start stop) (list? index? index?)
   #{ #@(map (lambda (i) #{ $xx . #i #}) (iota (- stop start -1) start)) #})
bk = \break
shf = \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = 1.75 
flu.01 = { r2. |}
flu.02 = { c4 a4 g8 f16 e16 |}
flu.03 = { d2 r4 |}
flu.04 = { d4 b4 a8 g16 f16 |}
flu.05 = { e8 gs16 b16 d'4 b8 d'8 |\bk}
flu.06 = { c'4 b4. g?8 |}
flu.07 = { a4 r4 c'8 a8 |}
flu.08 = { g2 r4 |}
flu.09 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
flu.10 = { a2 4 |\bk}
flu.11 = { g2 f4 |}
flu.12 = { e2 4 |}
flu.13 = { d2 a4 |}
flu.14 = { g2 a8( b8 |}
flu.15 = { c'8 e' d' c' e fs |\bk}
flu.16 = { g2) d'4 |}
flu.17 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
flu.18 = { a2 r4 |}
flu.19 = { d'4 c'4. a8 |}
flu.20 = { b2 a8 g8 |\bk}
flu.21 = { c'4 g4 f8 e8 |}
flu.22 = { d8 a f d a b |}
flu.23 = { r2. |}
flu.24 = { r2. |}
flu.25 = { c'2 b8 f8 |\bk}
flu.26 = { a4. 8 g f |}
flu.27 = { e2. |}
flu.28 = { r2. |}
flu.29 = { r2. |}
flu.30 = { b4 e d' |\bk}
flu.31 = { c'4 e a |}
flu.32 = { b2 r4 |}
flu.33 = { r2. |}
flu.34 = { r2. |}
flu.35 = { e4 b, e8 fs |\bk}
flu.36 = { gs8( b)\fermata b2 |} 
flu.37 = { r2. |}
flu.38 = { b4 e d' |}
flu.39 = { c'4 e fs |}
flu.40 = { gs2 r4 |\bk}
flu.41 = { r8 e8 a4 b4 |}
flu.42 = { c'4. b8 a8 c'8 |}
flu.43 = { b2.~ |}
flu.44 = { b2 r4 |}
flu.45 = { c'4 b4. g8 |\bk}
flu.46 = { a2 4 |}
flu.47 = { g2 f4 |}
flu.48 = { e2 r4 |}
flu.49 = { r8 d8 d' c' a fs |}
flu.50 = { g2 a8 b |\bk}
flu.51 = { c'4 e' d'8 c' |}
flu.52 = { b4 r8 a8 g8 a16 b16 |}
flu.53 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
flu.54 = { a2 r4 |}
flu.55 = { r8 d8 d'4 c8 a |\bk}
flu.56 = { b4 g a8 b |}
flu.57 = { c'4 g f8 e |}
flu.58 = { d8( a\fermata) 4 g |}
flu.59 = { c2. |}
flu.60 = { r2. |\bk}

flu.79 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
flu.80 = { a2 4 |}
flu.81 = { g4 d' f |}
flu.82 = { e4 c' e |}
flu.83 = { d4 a8 fs d d' |\bk}
flu.84 = { d'4 g a8 b |}
flu.85 = { c'4 e' fs |}
flu.86 = { g2 r4 |}
flu.87 = { r2. |}
flu.88 = { c4 a4. e8 |\bk}
flu.89 = { d2 r4 |}
flu.90 = { d4 b a8 g |}
flu.91 = { c'4 g f8 e |}
flu.92 = { d2 4 |\bar"||"}
flu.93 = { \key df \major c2. |\bk}
flu.94 = { r2. |}
flu.95 = { r2. |}
flu.96 = { r2. |}
flu.97 = { r2. |}
flu.98 = { r8 c8 8 f a c' |\bk}
flu.99 = { bf4. a?8 gf4 |}
flu.100 = { f2 r4 |}
flu.101 = { af2. |}
flu.102 = { f2 ef8 f16 g |}
flu.103 = { f2.~ |\bk}
flu.104 = { f2 r4 |}
flu.105 = { r2. |}
flu.106 = { r8 c8 8 f a c' |}
flu.107 = { bf4. af?8 gf4 |}
flu.108 = { f2 r4 |\bk}
flu.109 = { f4 df' c' |}
flu.110 = { bf4. c'8 df'4 |}
flu.111 = { c'2.~ |}
flu.112 = { c'2 r4 |\bk}
flu.113 = { df'4 c'4. af8 |}
flu.114 = { bf2 4 |}
flu.115 = { af8 ef af bf gf af |}
flu.116 = { f2 r4 |}
flu.117 = { r8 ef8 ef' df' bf g |\bk}
flu.118 = { af2 bf8 c' |}
flu.119 = { df'4 f g |}
flu.120 = { af2 r4 |}
flu.121 = { bf,4 af f8 df |}
flu.122 = { bf,2 r4 |\bk}
flu.123 = { bf,4 bf g8 ef |}
flu.124 = { c2 ef4 |}
flu.125 = { af2 gf8 f |}
flu.126 = { ef2 4 |}
flu.127 = { df2 f4 |\bk}
flu.128 = { bf4 r4 af8 bf16 c' |}
flu.129 = { df'4 bf4. f8 |}
flu.130 = { af2.\fermata |}
flu.131 = { r2. |\bk}
flu.132 = { df4. gf8 bf af16 gf |}
flu.133 = { af2 r4 |}
flu.134 = { df4. ef8 gf bf |}
flu.135 = { df'4 c'4. af8 |}
flu.136 = { bf8 af~ 2\fermata |\bar"|."}
flute = \fixed c'' {
  \global
  % Music follows here.
  \eVar \flu 01 60
  \repeat unfold 18 r2.
  \eVar \flu 79 136
}

sop.01 = { r2. |}
sop.02 = { r2. |}
sop.03 = { r2. |}
sop.04 = { r2. |}
sop.05 = { r2. |\bk}
sop.06 = { r2. |}
sop.07 = { r2. |}
sop.08 = { r2. |}
sop.09 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
sop.10 = { a2 4 |\bk}
sop.11 = { g2 f4 |}
sop.12 = { e2 4 |}
sop.13 = { d2 a4 |}
sop.14 = { g2 a8( b) |}
sop.15 = { c'2 4 |\bk}
sop.16 = { b,2 r4 |}
sop.17 = { c'4 b4. g8 |}
sop.18 = { a2 r4 |}
sop.19 = { d'4 c'4. a8 |}
sop.20 = { b2 a8 g |\bk}
sop.21 = { c'4 g f8( e) |}
sop.22 = { d2 4 |}
sop.23 = { c2. |}
sop.24 = { r2. |}
sop.25 = { c2. |\bk}
sop.26 = { r2. |}
sop.27 = { r2. |}
sop.28 = { r2. |}
sop.29 = { e2 4 |}
sop.30 = { b2 r4 |\bk}
sop.31 = { c'4 8 b a4 |}
sop.32 = { b2 e4 |}
sop.33 = { e2 4 |}
sop.34 = { e2 d4 |}
sop.35 = { e4~ 2~ |}
sop.36 = { e2 r4 |}
sop.37 = { e2 4 |}
sop.38 = { b2 r4 |}
sop.39 = { c'4 8 b a4 |}
sop.40 = { b2 e4 |\bk}
sop.41 = 

Exited with return code -1073741819.

2021-06-17 Thread ming tsang
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.23.0 [trust_in_the_Lord.ly]...

Processing `C:/Users/yming
tsang/Documents/CHOIR_2021/專心信主/trust_in_the_Lord.ly'

Parsing...

Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96]

Exited with return code -1073741819.



Dear lily ponders,
I am trying
-- 
ming (lyndon) tsang


Re: fix for Windows Exited with return code -1073741819 ?

2020-09-25 Thread Carl Sorensen
The issue is not that Windows is 32-bit, but that the Windows version of 
Lilypond is created with a 32-bit architecture (we don't have a mingw-64 build).

Carl




Re: fix for Windows Exited with return code -1073741819 ?

2020-09-25 Thread Andrew Bernard
What Windows are you running? Most Windows 10 systems are 64 bit,
althought I recall 32 bit was supported, not sure now. I am not sure
Windows 10 32 bit would run the 64 bit Linux subsystems. Tell us your
OS details.

Andrew



Re: fix for Windows Exited with return code -1073741819 ?

2020-09-25 Thread Damian leGassick



> On 25 Sep 2020, at 13:50, Karlin High  wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:30 AM damianlegassick  
> wrote:
>> I know that this has come up a few times and I'm aware that it's a Windows 
>> 32 bit memory issue
>> but does anyone actually have a fix? I have to work on a windows machine atm.
> 
> This might not rise to the level of a "fix." But with the recent
> Windows 10 versions there's an option to use Windows Subsystem for
> Linux for running the 64-bit Linux version of LilyPond.
> -- 
> Karlin High
> Missouri, USA

that could well be enough of a fix for now - I’ll try it thanks


Re: fix for Windows Exited with return code -1073741819 ?

2020-09-25 Thread Karlin High
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:30 AM damianlegassick  wrote:
> I know that this has come up a few times and I'm aware that it's a Windows 32 
> bit memory issue
> but does anyone actually have a fix? I have to work on a windows machine atm.

This might not rise to the level of a "fix." But with the recent
Windows 10 versions there's an option to use Windows Subsystem for
Linux for running the 64-bit Linux version of LilyPond.
-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA



fix for Windows Exited with return code -1073741819 ?

2020-09-25 Thread damianlegassick

Hi all


I know that this has come up a few times and I'm aware that it's a Windows 32 
bit memory issue


but does anyone actually have a fix? I have to work on a windows machine atm. 


thanks


Damian

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2020-03-10 Thread Samuel Burt
Just wanted to reply so that anyone searching will have some idea of how to
approach this problem.

I couldn't figure out how to get MSYS, which I already had installed, to
install Lilypond, so I installed Ubuntu for Windows. Lilypond was fairly
easy to install from the Lilypond website. Frescobaldi was more difficult.
I couldn't imagine a way to get the Windows version of Frescobaldi to use
the Ubuntu version of Lilypond for rendering. I installed Frescobaldi in
Ubuntu, next. What I eventually discovered was that I needed to install an
X server in Windows that Ubuntu could use. I didn't install it through
Ubuntu. Instead, I downloaded Xming Server.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xming/ It works like a charm.

If I want to get MIDI playback in Frescobaldi, I'll have to do more work.
One can always locate the folder where the files are generated and open the
MIDI file in a Windows program.

Sam



On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:30 AM Michael Gerdau  wrote:

> Hi Samuel,
>
> > Thanks for the reply. Do you use a package manager (like pacman in msys)
> or
> > do you install from source?
>
> The Linux Subsystem I install via MS Store - I prefer Debian but Ubuntu or
> any other should be fine too. You can install several of these in parallel.
>
> For installing LP I just grab the shar from the LP website and install it
> locally in a shell of the Linux Subsystem and fine. Possibly amend PATH and
> of course also add whatever further fonts you wish to use, but all in all
> nothing fancy. I think you can even call the lxss version from inside
> Frescobaldi though of the top of my head I'm not sure about the details.
> There was a thread on this list that should be in the archives though.
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
> --
> Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de
> GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
>


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2020-03-05 Thread Michael Gerdau
Hi Samuel,

> Thanks for the reply. Do you use a package manager (like pacman in msys) or
> do you install from source?

The Linux Subsystem I install via MS Store - I prefer Debian but Ubuntu or any 
other should be fine too. You can install several of these in parallel.

For installing LP I just grab the shar from the LP website and install it 
locally in a shell of the Linux Subsystem and fine. Possibly amend PATH and of 
course also add whatever further fonts you wish to use, but all in all nothing 
fancy. I think you can even call the lxss version from inside Frescobaldi 
though of the top of my head I'm not sure about the details. There was a thread 
on this list that should be in the archives though.

Kind regards,
Michael
-- 
Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver



Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2020-03-04 Thread Samuel Burt
Thanks for the reply. Do you use a package manager (like pacman in msys) or
do you install from source?

Sam



On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:56 PM Michael Gerdau  wrote:

> > I've got a fairly complicated score (cross staff beams) that I've almost
> > finished, but if I add any additional music it throws this error code:
> >
> > Exited with return code -1073741819
>
> Seems you hit the infamous problem with 32bit Windows memory constraints.
> FWIW when I run it on Windows as is I have the same problem. However it
> works w/o problems in the Windows Linux SubSystem.
>
> I'll send you the PDF and also the long list of complaints/errors reported
> by LP in a separate mail to not fill the list archive.
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
> --
> Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de
> GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
>


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2020-03-04 Thread Michael Gerdau
> I've got a fairly complicated score (cross staff beams) that I've almost
> finished, but if I add any additional music it throws this error code:
> 
> Exited with return code -1073741819

Seems you hit the infamous problem with 32bit Windows memory constraints. FWIW 
when I run it on Windows as is I have the same problem. However it works w/o 
problems in the Windows Linux SubSystem.

I'll send you the PDF and also the long list of complaints/errors reported by 
LP in a separate mail to not fill the list archive.

Kind regards,
Michael
-- 
Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver



Exited with return code -1073741819

2020-03-04 Thread Samuel Burt
Hi list.

I've got a fairly complicated score (cross staff beams) that I've almost
finished, but if I add any additional music it throws this error code:

Exited with return code -1073741819


I see people had problems in the past with the latest thread being 2018,
but I don't see that there is any definitive answer.

I'm using version "2.20.0" in Frescobaldi in Windows 10 (Version 10.0.18362
Build 18362).


Here's the link to my lilypond file. I'd really appreciate it if someone
could render it (or fail) and let me know if they have the same problem.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nU5DCEzSafdk93Lc-b3WGlA-Hh7btUsf/view?usp=sharing


Thanks!


Sam


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-04-05 5:40 GMT+02:00 Bruce Daniel :
> Thanks David and Harm.
> Before troubling you more I will try 2.19.81. In fact I am already using
> 2.18.1.
>
> The .ly file was 24 KB.
> The problem only occurs when I take a song already (successfully) scored as
> a volta of 3 to 5 verses and split it into two back-to-back voltas to make
> for easier sight reading.
>
> Cheers, Bruce



Hi  Bruce,

without the code nobody can say anything well-founded, only guessing
will not help much...
So I'd offer you send me the code privately and I'll have a look.

Cheers,
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-05 Thread David Wright
On Thu 05 Apr 2018 at 06:30:52 (+0200), Helge Kruse wrote:
> Am 05.04.2018 4:35 vorm. schrieb "David Wright" :
> > > It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
> > > current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other codes.
> 
> > Googling 1073741819 is jaw-dropping. I don't think you'll find out
> > anything specific from that particular code.
> 
> Well, using a search machine to find an error code interpretation is not
> necesdarily sensible.

Eminently sensible in my experience. The days of consulting a shelf of
printed manuals are long gone.

But the hits returned have to be interpreted carefully. There may be
cases that are easily solved, but the wide variety of symptoms and
fixes shows that most of them will not apply to any individual case.
As you have spotted, the message is generic.

> The number -1073741819 (a bit different)

Identical to google, except that you have to escape the - (which
carries the meaning "exclude pages that contain this string) either
by quoting it "-1073741819", or by deleting it. The latter is
easier of course.

> can also
> represented as 0xC005 assuming thar the program use a 32 bit number
> range.
> That error code is a composition of the error number (5: access denied) and
> the error class. 0xC000 stands for generic error.
> So all you get from the code is "access denied". The actual error can only
> be found if Lilypond issues the function that returned this code. Do you
> think that the complete error message could be shared?

This argument has already been rehearsed:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00313.html

Tracing errors like this (assuming "access" here refers to something
resembling an out-of-bounds error) is notoriously difficult. Even when
you find some problem code that provokes it, just adding debug code
can make the problem apparently disappear or manifest itself in a
more benign manner (hitting the wrong place but still within bounds).

You could try running the program with strace (system trace) but this
only finds errors connected with system calls (eg many of the
permissions errors reported on those google hits). If the problem is
deep within some mathematical computations, say, then strace will be
no help at all.

So sometimes the answer is to look to ones own behaviour and see if
the way one's LP source is constructed could be "improved" so as not
to provoke the error. Unfortunately it's easy for this to look like
cargo cult behaviour.

> I also wonder why the error codes are displayed as decimal numbers.
> Wouldn't it improve tge user experience if the code is readable?

Yes, unfortunately when these composite numbers get passed around, the
receiver might not be aware of the significance of the composition,
or care.

PS to Karlin High. Unless there's a manifest cause of the error,
any reduction in the problem size is likely to "fix" it.
If a car's suspension rattles because it's overloaded, then any
attempt at diagnosis by removing potential sources of the rattle
will thereby reduce the weight and the rattling will stop: labour
costs spiral. That said, I did wonder about how the "splitting"
is being done and whether it's leading to unintended complexity.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-04 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 05.04.2018 4:35 vorm. schrieb "David Wright" :


> > It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
> > current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other codes.

Googling 1073741819 is jaw-dropping. I don't think you'll find out
anything specific from that particular code.

Well, using a search machine to find an error code interpretation is not
necesdarily sensible. The number -1073741819 (a bit different) can also
represented as 0xC005 assuming thar the program use a 32 bit number
range.
That error code is a composition of the error number (5: access denied) and
the error class. 0xC000 stands for generic error.
So all you get from the code is "access denied". The actual error can only
be found if Lilypond issues the function that returned this code. Do you
think that the complete error message could be shared?
I also wonder why the error codes are displayed as decimal numbers.
Wouldn't it improve tge user experience if the code is readable?

Best regards
Helge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-04 Thread Karlin High

On 4/4/2018 10:40 PM, Bruce Daniel wrote:
The problem only occurs when I take a song already (successfully) scored 
as a volta of 3 to 5 verses and split it into two back-to-back voltas to 
make for easier sight reading.


You will get better help if a tiny example is provided.

--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-04 Thread Bruce Daniel
Thanks David and Harm.
Before troubling you more I will try 2.19.81. In fact I am already using
2.18.1.

The .ly file was 24 KB.
The problem only occurs when I take a song already (successfully) scored as
a volta of 3 to 5 verses and split it into two back-to-back voltas to make
for easier sight reading.

Cheers, Bruce

On 5 April 2018 at 12:35, David Wright  wrote:

> On Sun 01 Apr 2018 at 07:13:10 (+1000), Bruce Daniel wrote:
> > Just a bit more information.
> > The problem only occurs when I have two volta sections back to back.
> > Cheers, Bruce
> >
> > On 31 March 2018 at 20:41, Bruce Daniel  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lilypond users,
> > >
> > > I've come across a recurring problem with strophic songs I'm working
> on.
> > > It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
> > > current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other
> codes.
>
> Googling 1073741819 is jaw-dropping. I don't think you'll find out
> anything specific from that particular code.
>
> > > If the engrave fails, I can delete some words from one verse which
> allows
> > > me to add words to another verse. This suggests to me a limiting file
> size
> > > or level of complexity. I've had this problem now with 2 or 3 songs in
> a
> > > 20-song cycle I am working on.
>
> Presumably you get these errors when you're compiling a single song?
>
> > > The strophic songs are complex in that there
> > > are lots of "splits" in the vocal line due to different scanning of the
> > > words in different verses.
>
> It might be worth knowing what you mean here, and how you're "splitting".
>
> > > I am currently half a verse from the end of the last song and cannot
> > > manage to finish it! I admit to having no clue as to where the fault is
> > > coming from. Obviously a tiny example will not simulate it, so
> > > unfortunately I can only attach the whole song.
>
> How large is the source file? The image files that people post here
> should easily exceed the size of LP source files. I plead guilty to
> once posting 267KB.
>
> > > You should find (I have
> > > tried this on 2 computers, both Windows 10) that adding a word or two
> to
> > > the last verse will cause the error. Then delete a word or two from the
> > > previous verse and it will work again.
>
> It would appear that any sort of nudge can be enough to "fix" things
> (ie avoid whatever causes the error). For example, removing trailing
> whitespace from the source is reported as fixing a "similar" problem
> here:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00308.html
>
> > > Any help you can give would be much appreciated; the project has been a
> > > lot of work and the finishing line is in sight!
> > >
> > > Lilypond version 2.16.0
>
> I agree with Harm: upgrade. With an error like this, running the
> source through convert-ly even only as far as 2.18.2 might be enough
> to allow it to compile.
>
> > > PS: the effort to learn Lilypond was absolutely worth the effort. The
> joy
> > > of seeing these completed scores of Shubert's music I cannot describe;
> no
> > > other software comes close! Congratulations to all the developers.
>
> Seconded.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-04 Thread David Wright
On Sun 01 Apr 2018 at 07:13:10 (+1000), Bruce Daniel wrote:
> Just a bit more information.
> The problem only occurs when I have two volta sections back to back.
> Cheers, Bruce
> 
> On 31 March 2018 at 20:41, Bruce Daniel  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Lilypond users,
> >
> > I've come across a recurring problem with strophic songs I'm working on.
> > It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
> > current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other codes.

Googling 1073741819 is jaw-dropping. I don't think you'll find out
anything specific from that particular code.

> > If the engrave fails, I can delete some words from one verse which allows
> > me to add words to another verse. This suggests to me a limiting file size
> > or level of complexity. I've had this problem now with 2 or 3 songs in a
> > 20-song cycle I am working on.

Presumably you get these errors when you're compiling a single song?

> > The strophic songs are complex in that there
> > are lots of "splits" in the vocal line due to different scanning of the
> > words in different verses.

It might be worth knowing what you mean here, and how you're "splitting".

> > I am currently half a verse from the end of the last song and cannot
> > manage to finish it! I admit to having no clue as to where the fault is
> > coming from. Obviously a tiny example will not simulate it, so
> > unfortunately I can only attach the whole song.

How large is the source file? The image files that people post here
should easily exceed the size of LP source files. I plead guilty to
once posting 267KB.

> > You should find (I have
> > tried this on 2 computers, both Windows 10) that adding a word or two to
> > the last verse will cause the error. Then delete a word or two from the
> > previous verse and it will work again.

It would appear that any sort of nudge can be enough to "fix" things
(ie avoid whatever causes the error). For example, removing trailing
whitespace from the source is reported as fixing a "similar" problem
here:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00308.html

> > Any help you can give would be much appreciated; the project has been a
> > lot of work and the finishing line is in sight!
> >
> > Lilypond version 2.16.0

I agree with Harm: upgrade. With an error like this, running the
source through convert-ly even only as far as 2.18.2 might be enough
to allow it to compile.

> > PS: the effort to learn Lilypond was absolutely worth the effort. The joy
> > of seeing these completed scores of Shubert's music I cannot describe; no
> > other software comes close! Congratulations to all the developers.

Seconded.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-01 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-03-31 23:13 GMT+02:00 Bruce Daniel :
> Just a bit more information.
> The problem only occurs when I have two volta sections back to back.
> Cheers, Bruce
>
> On 31 March 2018 at 20:41, Bruce Daniel  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lilypond users,
>>
>> I've come across a recurring problem with strophic songs I'm working on.
>> It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
>> current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other codes.
>>
>> If the engrave fails, I can delete some words from one verse which allows
>> me to add words to another verse. This suggests to me a limiting file size
>> or level of complexity. I've had this problem now with 2 or 3 songs in a
>> 20-song cycle I am working on. The strophic songs are complex in that there
>> are lots of "splits" in the vocal line due to different scanning of the
>> words in different verses.
>>
>> I am currently half a verse from the end of the last song and cannot
>> manage to finish it! I admit to having no clue as to where the fault is
>> coming from. Obviously a tiny example will not simulate it, so unfortunately
>> I can only attach the whole song. You should find (I have tried this on 2
>> computers, both Windows 10) that adding a word or two to the last verse will
>> cause the error. Then delete a word or two from the previous verse and it
>> will work again.
>>
>> Any help you can give would be much appreciated; the project has been a
>> lot of work and the finishing line is in sight!
>>
>> Lilypond version 2.16.0
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bruce Daniel
>>
>> PS: the effort to learn Lilypond was absolutely worth the effort. The joy
>> of seeing these completed scores of Shubert's music I cannot describe; no
>> other software comes close! Congratulations to all the developers.



Hi Bruce,

your previous mssage was not distributed on the list, it can't be
found in the archives either.
Maybe the attachment was too large, so nobody can test.

That said, 2.16.0 is an ancient version you will not get much support.
According to
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00564.html
the problem may be fixed since 2.19.48.
So I recommend to use an up to date version.
Most recent is 2.19.81


Cheers,
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819

2018-04-01 Thread Bruce Daniel
Just a bit more information.
The problem only occurs when I have two volta sections back to back.
Cheers, Bruce

On 31 March 2018 at 20:41, Bruce Daniel  wrote:

> Hi Lilypond users,
>
> I've come across a recurring problem with strophic songs I'm working on.
> It seems that beyond a certain level of complexity I get Exit. In the
> current example it's return code -1073741819, but it can be other codes.
>
> If the engrave fails, I can delete some words from one verse which allows
> me to add words to another verse. This suggests to me a limiting file size
> or level of complexity. I've had this problem now with 2 or 3 songs in a
> 20-song cycle I am working on. The strophic songs are complex in that there
> are lots of "splits" in the vocal line due to different scanning of the
> words in different verses.
>
> I am currently half a verse from the end of the last song and cannot
> manage to finish it! I admit to having no clue as to where the fault is
> coming from. Obviously a tiny example will not simulate it, so
> unfortunately I can only attach the whole song. You should find (I have
> tried this on 2 computers, both Windows 10) that adding a word or two to
> the last verse will cause the error. Then delete a word or two from the
> previous verse and it will work again.
>
> Any help you can give would be much appreciated; the project has been a
> lot of work and the finishing line is in sight!
>
> Lilypond version 2.16.0
>
> Best regards,
> Bruce Daniel
>
> PS: the effort to learn Lilypond was absolutely worth the effort. The joy
> of seeing these completed scores of Shubert's music I cannot describe; no
> other software comes close! Congratulations to all the developers.
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread MING TSANG
Robert,
Thank you for the info. I will out wise resistry cleaner. If I am comfortable, 
I will download and install.
Ming.

  From: Robert Murdoch <rmurdo...@ntlworld.com>
 To: tsan...@rogers.com 
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
 Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:46 AM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
  I've experienced this problem before. It's a registry issue. I recommend 
downloading the free program Wise Registry Cleaner. Best regards.
  

   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:13 PM, MING TSANG  wrote:
> David,
> I am afraid to try tempering UAC. I have no idea what it is. I am just an
> ordinary window user.
> Ming
>

(I think you might have sent a similar message, to which I replied.)

-DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread MING TSANG
David,I am afraid to try tempering UAC. I have no idea what it is. I am just an 
ordinary window user.Ming

  From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> 
Cc: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>; 
"noeck.marb...@gmx.de" <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
 Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 12:45 PM
 Subject: Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:39 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> David Nalesnik,
> Thanks for the reply.  As suggested I re-send the file without the pdf to
> lilypond-user.
> Ming

I'd be interested in hearing if you tried my suggestion, and if so, if
it worked for you.

Best,
David


   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:58 AM, MING TSANG  wrote:
> David Nalesnik,
>
> I am afraid to try tempering UAC.
>

Then why not try running lilypond from Command Prompt (admin)?
(Right-click on the start menu, look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage)

That worked for me, and it's the only suggestion I have, other than
trying Robert Murdoch's suggestion above.

Let us know what works for you.

Thanks,
David

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread MING TSANG
David Nalesnik,
I am afraid to try tempering UAC.
Thanks,Ming

  From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>; lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
Cc: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>; "noeck.marb...@gmx.de" <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
 Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:10 AM
 Subject: Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.
>
> After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command Prompt,"
>
>>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly
>
> I found the error:
>
>>echo %errorlevel%
> 255
>
>>net helpmsg 255
>
> The extended attributes are inconsistent.
>
> --
> Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878
>
> Do what it says, and *restart*
>
> Hope that works for you and others!

Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
let me know.

DN


   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:39 AM, MING TSANG  wrote:
> David Nalesnik,
> Thanks for the reply.  As suggested I re-send the file without the pdf to
> lilypond-user.
> Ming

I'd be interested in hearing if you tried my suggestion, and if so, if
it worked for you.

Best,
David

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread MING TSANG
David Nalesnik,Thanks for the reply.  As suggested I re-send the file without 
the pdf to lilypond-user.Ming

  From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>; lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
Cc: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>; "noeck.marb...@gmx.de" <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
 Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:26 AM
 Subject: Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
Hi Ming,

[adding user list]

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> MY request to the lilypond-user mailing list
>
>    Posting of your message titled "Re: Exited with return code
> -1073741819."
>
> has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
> following reason for rejecting your request:
>
> "Your message is huge!  Much too large to send to a large mailing
> list.
>

You don't need to include the PDF file, just the LY.  It's certainly
not too large, so you may want to forward it so everybody can have a
look.  I've certainly experienced these mysterious -1073741819 errors,
and I believe others have too.

>
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
> To: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>; David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
> Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "noeck.marb...@gmx.de"
> <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> David Nalesnik and David Kastrup and Noeck:
> I am attaching lily file and pdf. This is a work-in-progress file. The pdf
> is from v2.19.55
> if I comment rgt.42  both versions compile. Add rgt.42  v2.19.55 compiled
> and v219.56 fails.
> I do know very running lilypond in command mode.  I have been using
> frecobaldi since it first available.
> Thank you for looking into this.
> Ming.
>
>
>  log runing v2.19.56
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
> Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
>
>  log running v2.19.55
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.55 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Interpreting music...
> MIDI output to `who-has-promised_test.mid'...
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
> Drawing systems...
> Layout output to `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
> Converting to `who-has-promised_test.pdf'...
> Deleting `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
> Success: compilation successfully completed
> Completed successfully in 18.0".
>
> ____
> From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
> To: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
> Cc: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
> <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
>>>> patches.
>>>
>>> An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
>>> a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
>>> intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.
>>
>> If he's consisting the Horizontal_bracket_engraver, that would be a
>> telltale sign.
>>
>>>
>>>> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
>>>> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
>>>
>>> It won't likely go away on its own.
>>
>> Ming--it might be a good idea if you provided your file.  I and others
>> can try it out.
>
>>
>
> Also, what happens when you compile the file on the command line?
>
> DN
>


I wonder where you found the information about "Python overflow".
When I google the error code, I find no information about what the
error *means*, only information about how to fix it.

When I run your files in Frescobaldi (2.18.1, Windows 10), I get a
successful run with all measures included.

However, when I run your fi

Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:26 AM, David Wright  wrote:
> On Wed 08 Mar 2017 at 08:28:54 (-0600), David Nalesnik wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:10 AM, David Nalesnik  
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik  
>> > wrote:
>> >> OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.
>> >>
>> >> After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command 
>> >> Prompt,"
>> >>
>> >>>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly
>> >>
>> >> I found the error:
>> >>
>> >>>echo %errorlevel%
>> >> 255
>> >>
>> >>>net helpmsg 255
>> >>
>> >> The extended attributes are inconsistent.
>
> Hmm.
>
>> >> --
>> >> Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:
>> >>
>> >> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878
>> >>
>> >> Do what it says, and *restart*
>> >>
>> >> Hope that works for you and others!
>> >
>> > Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
>> > there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>>
>> Now here's the odd thing.
>>
>> I decided that shutting UAC off was not a great idea, since it's
>> protecting me from threats unknown!  So I followed the steps again,
>> put things back to "Windows Default".  Restarted.  Expected the file
>> not to compile, but the file (with the one-line-too-many) compiles on
>> the command line just fine.
>>
>> I had thought that a better way was to elevate the user privileges of
>> lilypond.exe, but maybe all it takes to fix the problem is to follow
>> the solution at the link, then go back to the previous setting?
>
> I'm sitting here waiting to be proved wrong, but that sounds like a
> load of Cargo Cult to me.
>

Fair enough, though I succeeded in getting the file to compile on my
system.  I couldn't verify with Frescobaldi (which from the output I
assume the OP is using), b/c compiling with Frescobaldi worked for me.

Best,
David

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Wright
On Wed 08 Mar 2017 at 08:28:54 (-0600), David Nalesnik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:10 AM, David Nalesnik  
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik  
> > wrote:
> >> OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.
> >>
> >> After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command 
> >> Prompt,"
> >>
> >>>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly
> >>
> >> I found the error:
> >>
> >>>echo %errorlevel%
> >> 255
> >>
> >>>net helpmsg 255
> >>
> >> The extended attributes are inconsistent.

Hmm.

> >> --
> >> Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:
> >>
> >> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878
> >>
> >> Do what it says, and *restart*
> >>
> >> Hope that works for you and others!
> >
> > Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
> > there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
> > let me know.
> >
> 
> Now here's the odd thing.
> 
> I decided that shutting UAC off was not a great idea, since it's
> protecting me from threats unknown!  So I followed the steps again,
> put things back to "Windows Default".  Restarted.  Expected the file
> not to compile, but the file (with the one-line-too-many) compiles on
> the command line just fine.
> 
> I had thought that a better way was to elevate the user privileges of
> lilypond.exe, but maybe all it takes to fix the problem is to follow
> the solution at the link, then go back to the previous setting?

I'm sitting here waiting to be proved wrong, but that sounds like a
load of Cargo Cult to me.

I'd be wary of making changes to your system based on what you read
about "error 255". Read the second paragraph of this instead:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms681382

The error codes listed here will result from windows system calls
buried deep in some code. But who says it was a system call that
provoked the error, rather than some error detected in, say, LP,
python or one of the other programs involved?

The only simple numerical interpretation of the OP's return¹ code
is that it's 4 expressed in 30 inverted bits. (I'm assuming no one
has devised a list of 1073741823 error numbers.) This is just as
likely to be incorrectly interpreted without knowing exactly where
and by whom it was issued.

¹here, error number ≡ return code.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread Anders Eriksson
Not knowing anything about the particulars of the version and the .ly 
file. I would assume that when you ran Lilypond with UAC disabled it 
wrote something in a place where UAC normally stops you from and now 
after you have enabled UAC again it just reads from this place.


This place can be a file or the Registry...

// Anders

On 2017-03-08 15:28, David Nalesnik wrote:

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:10 AM, David Nalesnik  wrote:

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik  wrote:

OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.

After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command Prompt,"


lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly

I found the error:


echo %errorlevel%

255


net helpmsg 255

The extended attributes are inconsistent.

--
Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878

Do what it says, and *restart*

Hope that works for you and others!

Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
let me know.


Now here's the odd thing.

I decided that shutting UAC off was not a great idea, since it's
protecting me from threats unknown!  So I followed the steps again,
put things back to "Windows Default".  Restarted.  Expected the file
not to compile, but the file (with the one-line-too-many) compiles on
the command line just fine.

I had thought that a better way was to elevate the user privileges of
lilypond.exe, but maybe all it takes to fix the problem is to follow
the solution at the link, then go back to the previous setting?

DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:10 AM, David Nalesnik  wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik  
> wrote:
>> OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.
>>
>> After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command Prompt,"
>>
>>>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly
>>
>> I found the error:
>>
>>>echo %errorlevel%
>> 255
>>
>>>net helpmsg 255
>>
>> The extended attributes are inconsistent.
>>
>> --
>> Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:
>>
>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878
>>
>> Do what it says, and *restart*
>>
>> Hope that works for you and others!
>
> Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
> there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
> let me know.
>

Now here's the odd thing.

I decided that shutting UAC off was not a great idea, since it's
protecting me from threats unknown!  So I followed the steps again,
put things back to "Windows Default".  Restarted.  Expected the file
not to compile, but the file (with the one-line-too-many) compiles on
the command line just fine.

I had thought that a better way was to elevate the user privileges of
lilypond.exe, but maybe all it takes to fix the problem is to follow
the solution at the link, then go back to the previous setting?

DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:55 AM, David Nalesnik  wrote:
> OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.
>
> After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command Prompt,"
>
>>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly
>
> I found the error:
>
>>echo %errorlevel%
> 255
>
>>net helpmsg 255
>
> The extended attributes are inconsistent.
>
> --
> Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878
>
> Do what it says, and *restart*
>
> Hope that works for you and others!

Note:  I can't say what the consequences of shutting off UAC are.  If
there is a better way to get extended privileges for LilyPond, please
let me know.

DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
OK, Seems I fixed it for my system.

After I run lilypond with the file in the ordinary windows "Command Prompt,"

>lilypond  who-has-promised_test.ly

I found the error:

>echo %errorlevel%
255

>net helpmsg 255

The extended attributes are inconsistent.

--
Googling this super unhelpful error message leads me here:

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-other_settings/windows-10-the-extended-attributes-are/bf8dd5dd-c179-4c1f-84f2-9d526a0d4878

Do what it says, and *restart*

Hope that works for you and others!

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:26 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> [adding user list]
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
>> MY request to the lilypond-user mailing list
>>
>> Posting of your message titled "Re: Exited with return code
>> -1073741819."
>>
>> has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
>> following reason for rejecting your request:
>>
>> "Your message is huge!  Much too large to send to a large mailing
>> list.
>>
>
> You don't need to include the PDF file, just the LY.  It's certainly
> not too large, so you may want to forward it so everybody can have a
> look.  I've certainly experienced these mysterious -1073741819 errors,
> and I believe others have too.
>
>>
>> - Forwarded Message -
>> From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
>> To: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>; David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
>> Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "noeck.marb...@gmx.de"
>> <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 11:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>>
>> David Nalesnik and David Kastrup and Noeck:
>> I am attaching lily file and pdf. This is a work-in-progress file. The pdf
>> is from v2.19.55
>> if I comment rgt.42  both versions compile. Add rgt.42  v2.19.55 compiled
>> and v219.56 fails.
>> I do know very running lilypond in command mode.  I have been using
>> frecobaldi since it first available.
>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> Ming.
>>
>>
>>  log runing v2.19.56
>> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
>> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
>> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
>> Exited with return code -1073741819.
>>
>>
>>  log running v2.19.55
>> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.55 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
>> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
>> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
>> Preprocessing graphical objects...
>> Interpreting music...
>> MIDI output to `who-has-promised_test.mid'...
>> Finding the ideal number of pages...
>> Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
>> Drawing systems...
>> Layout output to `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
>> Converting to `who-has-promised_test.pdf'...
>> Deleting `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
>> Success: compilation successfully completed
>> Completed successfully in 18.0".
>>
>> 
>> From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
>> To: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
>> Cc: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>> <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>> MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
>>>>> patches.
>>>>
>>>> An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
>>>> a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
>>>> intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.
>>>
>>> If he's consisting the Horizontal_bracket_engraver, that would be a
>>> telltale sign.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
>>>>> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
>>>>
>>>> It 

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread Robert Murdoch
I've experienced this problem before. It's a registry issue. I recommend 
downloading the free program Wise Registry Cleaner 
.


Best regards.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-08 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Ming,

[adding user list]

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> MY request to the lilypond-user mailing list
>
> Posting of your message titled "Re: Exited with return code
> -1073741819."
>
> has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
> following reason for rejecting your request:
>
> "Your message is huge!  Much too large to send to a large mailing
> list.
>

You don't need to include the PDF file, just the LY.  It's certainly
not too large, so you may want to forward it so everybody can have a
look.  I've certainly experienced these mysterious -1073741819 errors,
and I believe others have too.

>
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
> To: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>; David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
> Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "noeck.marb...@gmx.de"
> <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> David Nalesnik and David Kastrup and Noeck:
> I am attaching lily file and pdf. This is a work-in-progress file. The pdf
> is from v2.19.55
> if I comment rgt.42  both versions compile. Add rgt.42  v2.19.55 compiled
> and v219.56 fails.
> I do know very running lilypond in command mode.  I have been using
> frecobaldi since it first available.
> Thank you for looking into this.
> Ming.
>
>
>  log runing v2.19.56
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
> Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
>
>  log running v2.19.55
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.55 [who-has-promised_test.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/user/Google
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised_test.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Interpreting music...
> MIDI output to `who-has-promised_test.mid'...
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
> Drawing systems...
> Layout output to `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
> Converting to `who-has-promised_test.pdf'...
> Deleting `./tmp-lilypond-OFQN5g'...
> Success: compilation successfully completed
> Completed successfully in 18.0".
>
> ________
> From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
> To: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
> Cc: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>; "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
> <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
>>>> patches.
>>>
>>> An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
>>> a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
>>> intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.
>>
>> If he's consisting the Horizontal_bracket_engraver, that would be a
>> telltale sign.
>>
>>>
>>>> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
>>>> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
>>>
>>> It won't likely go away on its own.
>>
>> Ming--it might be a good idea if you provided your file.  I and others
>> can try it out.
>
>>
>
> Also, what happens when you compile the file on the command line?
>
> DN
>


I wonder where you found the information about "Python overflow".
When I google the error code, I find no information about what the
error *means*, only information about how to fix it.

When I run your files in Frescobaldi (2.18.1, Windows 10), I get a
successful run with all measures included.

However, when I run your file on the command line I get popups telling
me that the program has stopped, needs to close, etc.  It runs with
the last measure commented out.

When I run the file in an admin command prompt, it works with the bad measure.

So, I wonder if the problem has to do with user permissions (UAC).
Maybe you could solve this problem by going here (if you're on Windows
10, that is):
https://www.tenforums.com/general-support/9872-file-system-error-1073741819-a.html

Hope this is helpful...

DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread David Nalesnik
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, David Nalesnik  wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup  wrote:
>> MING TSANG  writes:
>>
>>> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
>>> patches.
>>
>> An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
>> a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
>> intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.
>
> If he's consisting the Horizontal_bracket_engraver, that would be a
> telltale sign.
>
>>
>>> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
>>> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
>>
>> It won't likely go away on its own.
>
> Ming--it might be a good idea if you provided your file.  I and others
> can try it out.
>

Also, what happens when you compile the file on the command line?

DN

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread David Nalesnik
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup  wrote:
> MING TSANG  writes:
>
>> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
>> patches.
>
> An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
> a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
> intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.

If he's consisting the Horizontal_bracket_engraver, that would be a
telltale sign.

>
>> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
>> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
>
> It won't likely go away on its own.

Ming--it might be a good idea if you provided your file.  I and others
can try it out.

Best,
David

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread David Kastrup
MING TSANG  writes:

> My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two
> patches.

An audacious statement.  You are right about the patch of me: that is in
a special page-breaking routine you are not likely to use unless very
intentionally so.  But the other concerns all kinds of brackets.

> Since v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I
> will wait for v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.

It won't likely go away on its own.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
David Kastrup:
Thank you for your reply explanation.
I have no choice "Google Drive". Six years + ago I download google drive app 
and install. Since then iI doest not give me any problem.
My lilypond file does not contain anything to do with the two patches. Since 
v2.19.55 does compile, I will use v2.19.55 for the time being. I will wait for 
v2.19.57 to see if the problem goes away.
Thank you.Ming 

  From: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> 
Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; David Wright 
<lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>
 Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:40 PM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> writes:

> David,
> There is no white space in the file name nor path.

There is one between "Google" and "Drive".

> I run the same file with v2.19.55 and it compiles sucessful. But it
> didn't work with v2.19.56

I've taken a look at the changes between those versions, and there are
very few that would involve changes in the typesetting that could make
the difference of a stack overflow or not.

Basically two:

commit dbc2dd143e50e000a39883fc8217b4ec60e08657
Author: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
Date:  Sat Feb 4 19:13:31 2017 -0600

    Issue 5064 Let analysis brackets support text
    
    Ability to add labels to brackets is essential for musical analysis.
    
    This patch introduces a new grob, "HorizontalBracketText," a spanner
    created along with "HorizontalBracket" by Horizontal_bracket_engraver.
    
    Repeated text of broken brackets is parenthesized.

and

commit b27fe425c189263be20830b09c859d27245bb550
Author: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>
Date:  Tue Feb 14 13:33:13 2017 +0100

    Issue 5068: SCM/bool confusion in One_page_breaking::solve
    
    This replaces an accidentally always-true condition with the
    originally intended one.


Now it would be up to you to figure out whether or not one of those two
is involved.  That means running LilyPond in a debugger and, when it
crashes, looking at the backtrace.  Since it is a stack overflow, the
stack trace will be humongous with a lot of identical parts in the
middle.  So most of the middle will not be interesting.

-- 
David Kastrup


   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
Noeck,
Thank you for your reply.
Since I had problems with UTF-8 file name, I no longer use it.lilypond v2.19.55 
compiles the same file sucessfully, but v2.19.56 fails with caption subject.
Ming

  
   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread David Kastrup
MING TSANG  writes:

> David,
> There is no white space in the file name nor path.

There is one between "Google" and "Drive".

> I run the same file with v2.19.55 and it compiles sucessful. But it
> didn't work with v2.19.56

I've taken a look at the changes between those versions, and there are
very few that would involve changes in the typesetting that could make
the difference of a stack overflow or not.

Basically two:

commit dbc2dd143e50e000a39883fc8217b4ec60e08657
Author: David Nalesnik 
Date:   Sat Feb 4 19:13:31 2017 -0600

Issue 5064 Let analysis brackets support text

Ability to add labels to brackets is essential for musical analysis.

This patch introduces a new grob, "HorizontalBracketText," a spanner
created along with "HorizontalBracket" by Horizontal_bracket_engraver.

Repeated text of broken brackets is parenthesized.

and

commit b27fe425c189263be20830b09c859d27245bb550
Author: David Kastrup 
Date:   Tue Feb 14 13:33:13 2017 +0100

Issue 5068: SCM/bool confusion in One_page_breaking::solve

This replaces an accidentally always-true condition with the
originally intended one.


Now it would be up to you to figure out whether or not one of those two
is involved.  That means running LilyPond in a debugger and, when it
crashes, looking at the backtrace.  Since it is a stack overflow, the
stack trace will be humongous with a lot of identical parts in the
middle.  So most of the middle will not be interesting.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
David,
There is no white space in the file name nor path.I run the same file with 
v2.19.55 and it compiles sucessful. But it didn't work with v2.19.56
Ming

  From: David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> 
Cc: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
 Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:04 PM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
On Tue 07 Mar 2017 at 21:44:42 (+), MING TSANG wrote:
> After I send the email, I search user archived which suggest to do google 
> search and I found the error means python exit - stack overflow.   Now I know 
> the meaning. How can this be resolved?

Dunno, but the first thing might be to try removing the space
in the filename.

>      From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
>  To: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:25 PM
>  Subject: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>    
> I encounter exit error code. What does it mean?Ming. 
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised.ly]...Processing 
> `C:/Users/user/Google 
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised.ly'Parsing...Interpreting
>  music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]Exited with return code -1073741819.

Cheers,
David.


   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
addition info.   
I run lilypond v2.19.55 and it compiles sucessful, but for V2.19.56 error 
occurs with caption subject. 
Ming

  From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
 To: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:44 PM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
After I send the email, I search user archived which suggest to do google 
search and I found the error means python exit - stack overflow.   Now I know 
the meaning. How can this be resolved?
Ming 

  From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
 To: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:25 PM
 Subject: Exited with return code -1073741819.
  
I encounter exit error code. What does it mean?Ming. 
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised.ly]...Processing 
`C:/Users/user/Google 
Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised.ly'Parsing...Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]Exited with return code -1073741819.

   

   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread David Wright
On Tue 07 Mar 2017 at 21:44:42 (+), MING TSANG wrote:
> After I send the email, I search user archived which suggest to do google 
> search and I found the error means python exit - stack overflow.   Now I know 
> the meaning. How can this be resolved?

Dunno, but the first thing might be to try removing the space
in the filename.

>   From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
>  To: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:25 PM
>  Subject: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> I encounter exit error code. What does it mean?Ming. 
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised.ly]...Processing 
> `C:/Users/user/Google 
> Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised.ly'Parsing...Interpreting
>  music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]Exited with return code -1073741819.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread Noeck
Hi Ming,

the last few times such an error code was reported, I think there was
some problem with special (non-ASCII) characters or spaces in the file
name, if I remember correctly.

Does your file compile if it is not in the "Google Drive" folder but
somewhere with a path not containing any white space?

Best,
Joram


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
After I send the email, I search user archived which suggest to do google 
search and I found the error means python exit - stack overflow.   Now I know 
the meaning. How can this be resolved?
Ming 

  From: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
 To: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:25 PM
 Subject: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
I encounter exit error code. What does it mean?Ming. 
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised.ly]...Processing 
`C:/Users/user/Google 
Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised.ly'Parsing...Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]Exited with return code -1073741819.

   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Exited with return code -1073741819.

2017-03-07 Thread MING TSANG
I encounter exit error code. What does it mean?Ming. 
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.56 [who-has-promised.ly]...Processing 
`C:/Users/user/Google 
Drive/S-team/2017-04-02/who-promised/who-has-promised.ly'Parsing...Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48]Exited with return code -1073741819.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Lilypond bug "Exited with return code-1073741819" & workaround

2016-11-06 Thread Thomas Morley
mclaren,

2016-11-06 2:28 GMT+01:00 mclaren <metachroma...@gmail.com>:
> This simple example crashes Lilypond.

It's not a simple example.
If you want to announce a bug provide a minimal example, as others
said already. More below.

> You wouldn't think putting
> 6 broken tuplets into a measure would make Lilypond stop working,
> but it does. To get the error
>
> Exited with return code-1073741819

This is not a LilyPond-error-code/message.

> uncomment the line
>  % \time 4918233/340340
>
> and comment the lines immediately below
>
>  \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
>  \time 3237/224
>
>   The workaround for this Lilypond bug is to approximate the
> time signature 4918233/340340 with the smaller rational
> fraction time signature 3237/224. Apparently Lilypond can't
> deal with large time signatures.

Please, don't do unproofed statements.
How about testing with a minimal?

\version "2.18.2"

{
  \time 4918233/340340
  c'1*4918233/340340
  |
}

Works perfectly fine:

lilypond mclaren-01.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
Processing `mclaren-01.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
warning: strange time signature found: 4918233/340340
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `mclaren-01.ps'...
Converting to `./mclaren-01.pdf'...
Success: compilation successfully completed


> This makes no sense, since
> Lilypond runs on a modern computer with 64-bit integers,
> but Donald Trump is running for president, so no one
> said things would make sense.

Please, no politics on this list, it's no go.

>   To get the large time signature to print, we override
> printing the smaller rational fraction approximation
> time signature and then force printing of the large
> time signature.
>
>   Here's the Lilypond code:
>

Let's see how to create a minimal from your code to show a possible bug:

> \version "2.18.2"
>

header is not needed, delete

> \header {
>   tagline = ""  % removed
> }

paper-size is not needed, delete

> #(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)

indent is not needed, delete (I'm somewhat surprised it works at all,
not being in paper or layout)
> indent=0
>

You can delete the whole layout.
It makes no sense to always copy Score-settings to add one or two
overrides. And those overrides or not needed to show the bug at all.
Moving around engravers makes no sense as well, cause you obviously
use no different timing for the two staves.

>   \layout {
>   \context {
>   \Score
>  \override SpacingSpanner.uniform-stretching = ##t
>}
>   % \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-note-spacing = ##t
>\context {
>   \Score
>   proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 5/60)
> }
>

No clue what you try to achieve here, delete

>   \context {
> \type Engraver_group
> % Add elements that _can_ be printed
> \consists "Timing_translator"
> \consists "Time_signature_engraver"
>
> \alias "Staff"
>
>   }
>   \context {
> \Score
> %\accepts "TimeLine"
>
> \override TupletNumber.text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
> \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
>   }
>   \context {
> \Staff
> \consists "Timing_translator"
> \consists "Default_bar_line_engraver"
>
>   }
> }
>
>
>
>
> <<
>
> % Time signature:  [2 x (9/11) + 2 x (5/8) + 2 x (11/13) +
> %  2 x (3/5) + 2 x (13/17) + 2 x (4/7) + 6 ] eighth notes =
> % 11*11*13*5*17*7 = 680680, but this can be reduced by a
> % factor of 2 because there's an 8 in the denominator and
> % 2 in the numerator.
>
>
>
>

delete treble-clef, it's the default

> \new Staff { \clef "treble"
>% \time 4918233/340340
>
>   % This is the accurate time signature, but it crashes
>   % Lilypond. The solution? Use a rational approximation
>   % program to find the closest time signature -- 3237/224
>   % approximates 4918233/340340 to within 0.07142857143094261
> %\time 4918233/340340
>
>  %\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
>   %\time 3237/224
>
>   \override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>   \override Staff.TimeSignature.text =
>   \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 0) \center-column \number {
> \concat {
>   "4918233"
>
> }
> "340340"
>   }
>
> {
>
>
Why you copy 5 times the same?
Use repeat unfold.

Why repeating relative c'' all the time, set it once.

> \relative c''
>

You wrap this expression into {}, adding a new layer of sequential
music, delete

RE: Lilypond bug "Exited with return code-1073741819" & workaround

2016-11-05 Thread mclaren
Andrew --

Thanks for the suggestion about "minimal working examples."

I'm a little puzzled about how I can reduce the size of my Lilpond code. In
the example above, for instance, I need at least one full measure of those
broken tuplets because anything less doesn't get the numerator and
denominator big enough to crash Lilypond.

I included a bunch of different measures merely to show that my workaround
does, indeed, generate measures that pass Lilypond's bar checks, so my
workaround lets the Lilypond effectively get very large time signatures even
though Lilypond won't allow them. 

Thanks for your suggestion about MWEs. I will endeavour to reduce my
examples to smaller amounts of code in future. But not sure in all cases
it's practical, as in many instances I need multiple measures to show
spacing problems, failure of line breaks, etc.

Thanks to Urs Liska & Andrew Ho I think I've gotten Lilypond to force page
breaks now, so that should be less of an issue in the examples I post.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Lilypond-bug-Exited-with-return-code-1073741819-workaround-tp196195p196199.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: Lilypond bug "Exited with return code-1073741819" & workaround

2016-11-05 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hello mclaren (do you have a name for us?)

There's a willing community here ready to help, but we expect MWE's -
minimal working examples. I think that's only fair and reasonable, and has a
long tradition on this list.

Please refer to this guideline:

http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html

Do you truly expect people to give up their time reading long pages of your
code and entire scores to help out? Generally issues can be demonstrated in
a couple of dozen lines. Also, many find that boiling problems down to their
essence results in finding the solution or error anyway.

Are you expecting human musicians to play your complex time signatures? Or
is this computer only music? With the strident bashing of lilypond in your
comments, is this the right tool for you? If you are pushing code to
extremes, one generally needs to be prepared to deal with rough conditions
and some turbulence. Please try to remember that lilypond is open source
developed by dedicated volunteers and has never claimed or attempted to be
able to set every possible conceivable piece of music in the universe. All
tools have their limitations. If you use a chisel for a screwdriver, you
will wreck the edge.

Send MWE's and you will get much more assistance, I assure you.

Andrew



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Lilypond bug "Exited with return code-1073741819" & workaround

2016-11-05 Thread Urs Liska


Am 06.11.2016 um 02:28 schrieb mclaren:
> This simple example crashes Lilypond. 

This is not a simple example.
If you think you've come across a bug please create a "tiny example"
(http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html), "an example from which nothing
can be removed" and report it to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org.

This is especially important as you have a history of sending examples
with bad input.

Urs

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Lilypond bug "Exited with return code-1073741819" & workaround

2016-11-05 Thread mclaren
This simple example crashes Lilypond. You wouldn't think putting
6 broken tuplets into a measure would make Lilypond stop working,
but it does. To get the error

Exited with return code-1073741819

uncomment the line
 % \time 4918233/340340 

and comment the lines immediately below

 \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f  
 \time 3237/224 

  The workaround for this Lilypond bug is to approximate the
time signature 4918233/340340 with the smaller rational
fraction time signature 3237/224. Apparently Lilypond can't
deal with large time signatures. This makes no sense, since
Lilypond runs on a modern computer with 64-bit integers, 
but Donald Trump is running for president, so no one
said things would make sense.

  To get the large time signature to print, we override
printing the smaller rational fraction approximation
time signature and then force printing of the large
time signature. 

  Here's the Lilypond code:

\version "2.18.2"

\header { 
  tagline = ""  % removed 
} 
#(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)
indent=0

  \layout {
  \context {
  \Score
 \override SpacingSpanner.uniform-stretching = ##t   
   }
  % \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-note-spacing = ##t
   \context {
  \Score
  proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 5/60)
}
  
  \context {
\type Engraver_group
% Add elements that _can_ be printed
\consists "Timing_translator"
\consists "Time_signature_engraver"
   
\alias "Staff"
  
  }
  \context {
\Score
%\accepts "TimeLine"

\override TupletNumber.text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
\override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
  }
  \context {
\Staff
\consists "Timing_translator"
\consists "Default_bar_line_engraver"
   
  }
}


  
  
<<
  
% Time signature:  [2 x (9/11) + 2 x (5/8) + 2 x (11/13) + 
%  2 x (3/5) + 2 x (13/17) + 2 x (4/7) + 6 ] eighth notes =
% 11*11*13*5*17*7 = 680680, but this can be reduced by a
% factor of 2 because there's an 8 in the denominator and
% 2 in the numerator. 


  

\new Staff { \clef "treble"
   % \time 4918233/340340 

  % This is the accurate time signature, but it crashes
  % Lilypond. The solution? Use a rational approximation
  % program to find the closest time signature -- 3237/224
  % approximates 4918233/340340 to within 0.07142857143094261
%\time 4918233/340340 
  
 %\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f  
  %\time 3237/224 
  
  \override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print 
  \override Staff.TimeSignature.text = 
  \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 0) \center-column \number { 
\concat { 
  "4918233" 
  
} 
"340340" 
  }
  
{


\relative c''

{\tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} c8 }

\relative c''

{ \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} c8 }  
}
\bar "|"
\relative c''
{\tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} c8 }

\relative c''

{ \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} c8 }  

\bar "|"

\relative c''
{\tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} c8 }

\relative c''

{ \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} c8 }  

\bar "|"

\relative c''
{\tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} c8 }

\relative c''

{ \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} c8 }  

\bar "|"

\relative c''
{\tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} c8 }

\relative c''

{ \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} c8 }  

\bar "|"



}


\new Staff { \clef "treble"
  
 \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f  
  \time 3237/224 
  
  \override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print 
  \override Staff.TimeSignature.text = 
  \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 0) \center-column \number { 
\concat { 
  "4918233" 
  
} 
"340340" 
  }
\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} }  


\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} }  

\bar "|"

\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} }  


\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} }  

\bar "|"

\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 11/9 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 8/5 {c8[ c8]} c8 \tuplet 13/11
 {c8[ c8]} }  


\relative c''
{c8 \tuplet 5/3 {c8[ c8]}  c8 \tuplet 17/13 {c8[ c8]} c8 
 \tuplet 7/4 {c8[ c8]} }  

\bar "|

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-02 Thread David Wright
On Wed 02 Nov 2016 at 07:44:29 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I am not sure for whom you mean error prone - the user, or the compiler.

The user. Constructions like   seq 1 10   (eg, in bash) are designed
to avoid the need for   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Computers are good at
this, humans aren't. We slip up. Compilers don't.

> It seems like after many many repetitions of the variable constructs
> representing each bar lilypond just loses the plot and runs out of
> resources. It's probably a really obscure bug. It's a use case hardly worth
> testing, it being so unusual.

That may well be the problem, but it ought to detect the fact and say so.

> I could not see what the fixes were from your email David, unless I am
> missing an attachment. What did you do to make this work?

Three or four global replacements for the RHS variables,
a few copy to fill in the "borrowed" parts like \expandVar \sop 23 38
then a macro to erase the LHS variables and their = sign.
I left the redundant braces around each bar.

> -Original Message-
> From: David Wright 
> Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
> 
> Well, the reasons were given in
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-03/msg00609.html
> but I can't see that a construction like
> 
> sop.12 = \sop.1
> sop.13 = \sop.1
> sop.14 = \sop.1
> sop.15 = \sop.1
> sop.16 = \sop.5
> sop.17 = \sop.1
> sop.18 = \sop.1
> sop.19 = \sop.1
> sop.20 = \sop.1
> sop.21 = \sop.5
> 
> is any less error-prone than
> 
> R1 * 5 \break
> R1 * 5 \break
> 
> nor can I imagine that it involves any less copy, unless all the sop
> sop sop stuff was actually typed in. At least the source is not obfuscated,
> which it was last time.

Cheers,
David.
\version "2.19.49"
\language "english"
expandVar =
#(define-music-function (xx start stop) (list? index? index?)
   #{ #@(map (lambda (i) #{ $xx . #i #}) (iota (- stop start -1) start)) #})

\header {
  title = "能否於今天"
  subtitle = "Could This Be The Day?"
  composer = "Joseph M. Martin"
  arranger = "編 : 劉永生"
  poet = "詞 : 劉永生"
}

\layout {
  \context {
\Voice
\consists "Melody_engraver"
\override Stem #'neutral-direction = #'()
  }
}

global = {
  \key f \major
  \numericTimeSignature
  \time 4/4
  \tempo "Freely" 4=104
}

soprano = {
  \global
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { d'4^\markup"Tenderly"^\markup"S.A." a'4 4 4 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 { g'2( f'2) |\break }
 { d'4 a'4 4 b' |}
 { c''2 d''4 c''4 |}
 { b'4 c'' b' g' |}
 { a'1 |\break }
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 { g'2( f') |\break }
 { f'4 d''4 4 4 |}
 { c''4. f'8 4 a' |}
 { bf'4 a' g' f' |}
 { a'1~ |}
 { a'1 |\break }
 { a'2 4 4 |}
 { g'2 2 |}
 { bf'2 4 4 |}
 { a'2 2 |\break }
 { d''2 4 4 |}
 { c''2 a'4 c'' |}
 { c''2 bf'4 4 |}
 { a'1 |\break }
 { g'2 4 a' |}
 { bf'4 a' g' bf' |}
 { a'1 |}
 { a'2 2 |\break }
 { d'1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { c'4 f' a' c'' |}
 { c''2 r2 |}
 { r4 e'8 8 f'4( g') |}
 { a'2~ 2 |\break }
 { r2 f'8( g') a'( c'') |}
 { d''4( c'' b' g') |}
 { a'1 |}
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |\break }
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 { g'2( f'2) |}
 { f'4 d''4 4 4 |\break }
 { c''4. f'8 4 a' |}
 { bf'4 a' g' f' |}
 { a'1~ |}
 { a'1 |}
 { a'2 4 4 |\break }
 { g'2 2 |}
 { bf'2 4 4 |}
 { a'2 2 |}
 { d''2 4 4 |\break }
 { c''2 a'4 c'' |}
 { c''2 bf'4 4 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { g'2 4 a' |\break }
 { bf'4 a' g' bf' |}
 { a'1 |}
 { a'2 2 |}
 { d'1 |}
 { R1 | \break }
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
 { a'2( g') |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |\break }
 { c''4 bf'8( a') g'2 |}
 { bf'4 a'8 g' f'2 |}
 { a'4 g'8( f') e'4 f'8 e' |}
 { d'1 |\break }
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { a'1 |\bar"|." }
}

alto =  {
  \global
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 { g'2( f'2) |\break }
 { d'4 a'4 4 b' |}
 { c''2 d''4 c''4 |}
 { b'4 c'' b' g' |}
 { a'1 |\break }
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 { g'2( f') |\break }
 { f'4 d''4 4 4 |}
 { c''4. f'8 4 a' |}
 { bf'4 a' g' f' |}
 { a'1~ |}
 { a'1 |\break }
 { f'2 4 4 |}
 { f'2 e' |}
 { g'2 4 4 |}
 { g'2 f' |}
 { f'2 4 g' |}
 { g'4( f') 4 4 |}
 { e'2 4 4 |}
 { e'2( d') |}
 { ef'2 4 f' |}
 { g'4 f' ef' g' |}
 { f'1 |}
 { e'!2 2 |}
 { d'1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { R1 |}
 { c'4 f' a' c'' |}
 { c''2 r2 |}
 { r4 e'8 8 f'4( g') |}
 { a'2~ 2 |\break }
 { r2 f'8( g') a'( c'') |}
 { d''4( c'' b' g') |}
 { a'1 |}
 { d'4 a'4 4 4 |\break }
 { a'1 |}
 { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
 

RE: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-01 Thread Andrew Bernard
HI Folks,

I am not sure for whom you mean error prone - the user, or the compiler.

It seems like after many many repetitions of the variable constructs
representing each bar lilypond just loses the plot and runs out of
resources. It's probably a really obscure bug. It's a use case hardly worth
testing, it being so unusual. This style of coding in indeed obfuscated,
unnecessary, and time consuming to study and fix. Heavy going at the very
least.

I could not see what the fixes were from your email David, unless I am
missing an attachment. What did you do to make this work?


Andrew


-Original Message-
From: David Wright 
Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

Well, the reasons were given in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-03/msg00609.html
but I can't see that a construction like

sop.12 = \sop.1
sop.13 = \sop.1
sop.14 = \sop.1
sop.15 = \sop.1
sop.16 = \sop.5
sop.17 = \sop.1
sop.18 = \sop.1
sop.19 = \sop.1
sop.20 = \sop.1
sop.21 = \sop.5

is any less error-prone than

R1 * 5 \break
R1 * 5 \break

nor can I imagine that it involves any less copy, unless all the sop
sop sop stuff was actually typed in. At least the source is not obfuscated,
which it was last time.



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-01 Thread David Wright
On Tue 01 Nov 2016 at 15:23:21 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
> "Andrew Bernard"  writes:
> > Hi Ming,
> > We have been through this before, I am sorry to say. You write
> > lilypond code in a way that compiles, yes, but it is pathological in
> > the extreme, to put it mildly. You set each and every bar as a
> > variable, and when there are several voices, introduce new parallel
> > voices in every bar. As an example for the others, this is what you
> > do:
> >
> > lft.46 = { <<{g2 f2}\\{d1}>> |}
> >
> > lft.47 = { <<{r4 ef4~ 2}\\{g,1}>> |}
> 
> Those are not "new parallel voices": they still connect.  See:
> 
> {
>   << c''1~ \\ e'1~ >>
>   << c''1 \\ e'1 >>
> }
> 
> << ... \\ ... >> translates to
> << \context Voice = "1" ... \context Voice = "2" ... >>
> 
> so when the parallel voices line up perfectly in time, they still happen
> to connect.  It still makes a hash of understanding the code and
> debugging it and may well trigger rare problems in our context handling.
> 
> Without very good reason, choosing such a non-structure definitely looks
> like creating more problems than it solves.

Well, the reasons were given in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-03/msg00609.html
but I can't see that a construction like

sop.12 = \sop.1
sop.13 = \sop.1
sop.14 = \sop.1
sop.15 = \sop.1
sop.16 = \sop.5
sop.17 = \sop.1
sop.18 = \sop.1
sop.19 = \sop.1
sop.20 = \sop.1
sop.21 = \sop.5

is any less error-prone than

R1 * 5 \break
R1 * 5 \break

nor can I imagine that it involves any less copy, unless all the
sop sop sop stuff was actually typed in. At least the source is not
obfuscated, which it was last time.

Anyway, with a few global edits, the source compiles just fine.
Last page attached.

Cheers,
David.


pg_0007.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
"Andrew Bernard"  writes:

> Hi Ming,
>
>  
>
> We have been through this before, I am sorry to say. You write
> lilypond code in a way that compiles, yes, but it is pathological in
> the extreme, to put it mildly. You set each and every bar as a
> variable, and when there are several voices, introduce new parallel
> voices in every bar. As an example for the others, this is what you
> do:
>
>  
>
> lft.46 = { <<{g2 f2}\\{d1}>> |}
>
> lft.47 = { <<{r4 ef4~ 2}\\{g,1}>> |}

Those are not "new parallel voices": they still connect.  See:

{
  << c''1~ \\ e'1~ >>
  << c''1 \\ e'1 >>
}

<< ... \\ ... >> translates to
<< \context Voice = "1" ... \context Voice = "2" ... >>

so when the parallel voices line up perfectly in time, they still happen
to connect.  It still makes a hash of understanding the code and
debugging it and may well trigger rare problems in our context handling.

Without very good reason, choosing such a non-structure definitely looks
like creating more problems than it solves.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-01 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Ming,

 

We have been through this before, I am sorry to say. You write lilypond code in 
a way that compiles, yes, but it is pathological in the extreme, to put it 
mildly. You set each and every bar as a variable, and when there are several 
voices, introduce new parallel voices in every bar. As an example for the 
others, this is what you do:

 

lft.46 = { <<{g2 f2}\\{d1}>> |}

lft.47 = { <<{r4 ef4~ 2}\\{g,1}>> |}

lft.48 = \lft.47

lft.49 = { <<{r4 f4~ 2}\\{a,1}>> |}

lft.50 = { <<{r4 e!4 g2}\\{a,2. 4}>> |}

lft.51 = { <<{r4 <f'a'>2.}\\{1}>> |}

lft.52 = { <<{r4 <f'a'>2.}\\{cs'1}>> |}

lft.53 = { <<{r4 <f'a'>2.}\\{c'!1}>> |}

lft.54 = { <<{r4 <f'a'>2.}\\{b1}>> |}

lft.55 = { <<{r4 a4~ 2}\\{d1}>> |}

lft.56 = { <<{r4 c4 a2}\\{f,1}>> |}

lft.57 = { <<{r4 g2.}\\{c1}>> |}

 

 

There is no earthly reason for doing this, and I have no idea where you got 
this idea from. The problem with being idiosyncratic and uniquely individual in 
programming is that it makes it very hard nad needlessly time consuming for 
other people to help you, having to wade through all this non standard 
weirdness. I am not surprised the error keeps shifting around. We had the same 
thing last time if you care to consult your notes. I imagine lilypond sees all 
these needless constructs, and because they are just strange and nobody codes 
like that, latent obscure bugs are triggered with out of resource type errors, 
or who knows what, because nobody would test code that looks like this.

 

Everybody here is prepared to give their time and skill to helping out the 
community, but I am afraid you will have to learn to code in a more normal 
style for piano and SATB with several voices. Do you lack examples? I am sure 
we can find you some.

 

I am sorry if this sounds harsh. It not intended to be a personal criticism nor 
is it an attack, it’s just that a) if you write normal scores I am sure your 
continual issues will evaporate and b) we can really only help when your scores 
are of a more normal form. I hope you understand. I also need to write this 
email to deter others in the future from coming up with strange solutions such 
as the way you encode your work.

 

Andrew

 

 

From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 10:22 PM
To: Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com>
Cc: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

 

Andrew,

Here is the .ly file.

 

I did further compile, now the error appear on left piano bar 54.

 

Thank you for your help.

 

Immanuel,

Ming

 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-11-01 Thread MING TSANG
Andrew,Here is the .ly file.
I did further compile, now the error appear on left piano bar 54.
Thank you for your help.
Immanuel,Ming

  From: Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> 
Cc: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
 Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 12:21 AM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
Can you send me the file to examine?
You have had problems like this before I have helped you with. I will wager it 
is the same thing.
Happy to help.
Andrew

On 30 October 2016 at 19:49, MING TSANG  wrote:

hi, lilyponders:
(1).  What is the meaning of the following error message?I have SATB + piano 
score of 100 bars. Each SATB+pianoRH coded with 100 bars. I started to code 
piano-LH and it was all compilable upto bar  45 (no error). But after coded bar 
46, I got the error.
(2)  Window 10 generate the Chinese character onto the file naming, why the 
error message cannot display the UTF-8 Chinese character? 
Thank for the help.



   \version "2.19.49"
\language "english"
expandVar =
#(define-music-function (xx start stop) (list? index? index?)
   #{ #@(map (lambda (i) #{ $xx . #i #}) (iota (- stop start -1) start)) #})

\header {
  title = "能否於今天"
  subtitle = "Could This Be The Day?"
  composer = "Joseph M. Martin"
  arranger = "編 : 劉永生"
  poet = "詞 : 劉永生"
}

\layout {
  \context {
\Voice
\consists "Melody_engraver"
\override Stem #'neutral-direction = #'()
  }
}

global = {
  \key f \major
  \numericTimeSignature
  \time 4/4
  \tempo "Freely" 4=104
}
sop.1 = { R1 |}
sop.2 = \sop.1
sop.3 = \sop.1
sop.4 = \sop.1
sop.5 = { \sop.1 \break }
sop.6 = \sop.1
sop.7 = \sop.1
sop.8 = \sop.1
sop.9 = \sop.1
sop.10 = \sop.1
sop.11 = \sop.5
sop.12 = \sop.1
sop.13 = \sop.1
sop.14 = \sop.1
sop.15 = \sop.1
sop.16 = \sop.5
sop.17 = \sop.1 
sop.18 = \sop.1
sop.19 = \sop.1
sop.20 = \sop.1
sop.21 = \sop.5
sop.22 = { d'4^\markup"Tenderly"^\markup"S.A." a'4 4 4 |}
sop.23 = { a'1 |}
sop.24 = { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
sop.25 = { g'2( f'2) |\break }
sop.26 = { d'4 a'4 4 b' |}
sop.27 = { c''2 d''4 c''4 |}
sop.28 = { b'4 c'' b' g' |}
sop.29 = { a'1 |\break }
sop.30 = { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
sop.31 = { a'1 |}
sop.32 = { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
sop.33 = { g'2( f') |\break }
sop.34 = { f'4 d''4 4 4 |}
sop.35 = { c''4. f'8 4 a' |}
sop.36 = { bf'4 a' g' f' |}
sop.37 = { a'1~ |}
sop.38 = { a'1 |\break }
sop.39 = { a'2 4 4 |}
sop.40 = { g'2 2 |}
sop.41 = { bf'2 4 4 |}
sop.42 = { a'2 2 |\break }
sop.43 = { d''2 4 4 |}
sop.44 = { c''2 a'4 c'' |}
sop.45 = { c''2 bf'4 4 |}
sop.46 = { a'1 |\break }
sop.47 = { g'2 4 a' |}
sop.48 = { bf'4 a' g' bf' |}
sop.49 = { a'1 |}
sop.50 = { a'2 2 |\break }
sop.51 = { d'1 |}
sop.52 = \sop.1
sop.53 = \sop.1
sop.54 = \sop.1
sop.55 = \sop.5
sop.56 = { c'4 f' a' c'' |}
sop.57 = { c''2 r2 |}
sop.58 = { r4 e'8 8 f'4( g') |}
sop.59 = { a'2~ 2 |\break }
sop.60 = { r2 f'8( g') a'( c'') |}
sop.61 = { d''4( c'' b' g') |}
sop.62 = { a'1 |}
sop.63 = { d'4 a'4 4 4 |\break }
sop.64 = { a'1 |}
sop.65 = { c'4 g'4 4 4 |}
sop.66 = { g'2( f'2) |}
sop.67 = { f'4 d''4 4 4 |\break }
sop.68 = { c''4. f'8 4 a' |}
sop.69 = { bf'4 a' g' f' |}
sop.70 = { a'1~ |}
sop.71 = { a'1 |}
sop.72 = { a'2 4 4 |\break }
sop.73 = { g'2 2 |}
sop.74 = { bf'2 4 4 |}
sop.75 = { a'2 2 |}
sop.76 = { d''2 4 4 |\break }
sop.77 = { c''2 a'4 c'' |}
sop.78 = { c''2 bf'4 4 |}
sop.79 = { a'1 |}
sop.80 = { g'2 4 a' |\break }
sop.81 = { bf'4 a' g' bf' |}
sop.82 = { a'1 |}
sop.83 = { a'2 2 |}
sop.84 = { d'1 |}
sop.85 = { \sop.5 \break }
sop.86 = { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
sop.87 = { a'2( g') |}
sop.88 = \sop.1
sop.89 = \sop.1
sop.90 = { d'4 a'4 4 4 |\break }
sop.91 = { c''4 bf'8( a') g'2 |}
sop.92 = { bf'4 a'8 g' f'2 |}
sop.93 = { a'4 g'8( f') e'4 f'8 e' |}
sop.94 = { d'1 |\break }
sop.95 = \sop.1
sop.96 = \sop.1
sop.97 = \sop.1
sop.98 = \sop.1
sop.99 = { a'1 |}
sop.100 = { a'1 |\bar"|." }
soprano =   {
  \global
  \expandVar \sop 1 100
}
alt.1 = { R1 |}
alt.22 = { d'4 a'4 4 4 |}
alt.39 = { f'2 4 4 |}
alt.40 = { f'2 e' |}
alt.41 = { g'2 4 4 |}
alt.42 = { g'2 f' |}
alt.43 = { f'2 4 g' |}
alt.44 = { g'4( f') 4 4 |}
alt.45 = { e'2 4 4 |}
alt.46 = { e'2( d') |}
alt.47 = { ef'2 4 f' |}
alt.48 = { g'4 f' ef' g' |}
alt.49 = { f'1 |}
alt.50 = { e'!2 2 |}
alt.67 = { f'4 bf'4 4 4 |}
alt.68 = { a'4. f'8 4 a' |}
alt.69 = \sop.69
alt.70 = \sop.70
alt.71 = \sop.71
alt.72 = { f'2 4 4 |}
alt.73 = { f'2 e' |}
alt.74 = { g'2 4 4 |}
alt.75 = { g'2 f' |}
alt.76 = { f'2 4 g' |}
alt.77 = { g'4( f') 4 4 |}
alt.78 = { e'2 4 4 |}
alt.79 = { e'2( d') |}
alt.80 = { ef'2 4 f' |}
alt.81 = { g'4 f' ef' g' |}
alt.82 = { f'1 |}
alt.83 = { a2 2 |}
alt.84 = { d'1 |}
alt.85 = \sop.85
alt.99 = { <fs'd'>1 }
alt.100 = { <f'd'>1 |}
alto =  {
  \global
  \alt.1
  \expandVar \sop 2 21 %38
  \alt.22
  \expandVar \sop 23 38
  \expandVar \alt 39 50
  \expandVar \sop 51 66
  \ex

Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-10-31 Thread Andrew Bernard
Can you send me the file to examine?

You have had problems like this before I have helped you with. I will wager
it is the same thing.

Happy to help.

Andrew


On 30 October 2016 at 19:49, MING TSANG  wrote:

> hi, lilyponders:
>
> (1).  What is the meaning of the following error message?
> I have SATB + piano score of 100 bars. Each SATB+pianoRH coded with 100
> bars. I started to code piano-LH and it was all compilable upto bar  45 (no
> error). But after coded bar 46, I got the error.
>
> (2)  Window 10 generate the Chinese character onto the file naming, why
> the error message cannot display the UTF-8 Chinese character?
>
> Thank for the help.
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-10-31 Thread Bernhard Kleine
I experienced the same error on  2016-10-19. I do not believe in
conincidences.

Regards

Bernhard


Am 31.10.2016 um 21:50 schrieb MING TSANG:
> Hi, Christ van Willegen,
>
> Thank for the info.
>
> The score is SATB + piano.
> I coded soprano first 100 bars, the alto 100 bars, then tenor 100 bars
> and bass 100 bars.  I compile the score every 5 bars added.  No error.   
> The I coded LH-piano 100 bars and no error.  I code LH-piano to bar
> 45, no error.  I coded 46, 47, 48,49 and 50 --- comile giving me the
> error.  I remove bar 50 compile error, I remove bar 49, compile error,
> I remove bar 48, compile error. Remove bar 47, compile error. Remove
> bar 46, compile error.  Remove 46, compile OK.   This is all done in
> lilypond 2.19.46.
>
> I saw there is lilypond 2.19.49 available. I download and install.
>  Now when code bar 46, compile OK; Code bar 47, compile error.
>
> I don't know what to do now.  Help is appreciated.
>
> Immanuel,
> Ming.
>
>
> 
> *From:* Christ van Willegen <cvwille...@gmail.com>
> *To:* MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com>
> *Cc:* Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2016 2:47 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 9:49 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com
> <mailto:tsan...@rogers.com>> wrote:
> > Exited with return code -1073741819.
>
>
> A quick Google search led to this:
> http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_security/file-system-error-1073741819-on-windows-10/30f76ed6-bac1-4863-bfc0-fddb746af898
>
> Perhaps a registry error or a file system error?
>
> Does 'rolling back' to less bars of music make the error go away?
>
> HTH!
>
> Christ van Willegen
> -- 
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
spitzhalde9
D-79853 lenzkirch
bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
-
thunderbird mit enigmail
GPG schlüssel: D5257409
fingerprint:
08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-10-31 Thread MING TSANG
Hi, Christ van Willegen,
Thank for the info.
The score is SATB + piano.I coded soprano first 100 bars, the alto 100 bars, 
then tenor 100 bars and bass 100 bars.  I compile the score every 5 bars added. 
 No error.   The I coded LH-piano 100 bars and no error.  I code LH-piano to 
bar 45, no error.  I coded 46, 47, 48,49 and 50 --- comile giving me the error. 
 I remove bar 50 compile error, I remove bar 49, compile error, I remove bar 
48, compile error. Remove bar 47, compile error. Remove bar 46, compile error.  
Remove 46, compile OK.   This is all done in lilypond 2.19.46.
I saw there is lilypond 2.19.49 available. I download and install.  Now when 
code bar 46, compile OK; Code bar 47, compile error.
I don't know what to do now.  Help is appreciated.
Immanuel,Ming.

  From: Christ van Willegen <cvwille...@gmail.com>
 To: MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> 
Cc: Lilypond-usermailinglist <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
 Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 2:47 PM
 Subject: Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.
   
Hello,

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 9:49 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> Exited with return code -1073741819.

A quick Google search led to this:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_security/file-system-error-1073741819-on-windows-10/30f76ed6-bac1-4863-bfc0-fddb746af898

Perhaps a registry error or a file system error?

Does 'rolling back' to less bars of music make the error go away?

HTH!

Christ van Willegen
-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0


   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-10-31 Thread Christ van Willegen
Hello,

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 9:49 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> Exited with return code -1073741819.

A quick Google search led to this:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_security/file-system-error-1073741819-on-windows-10/30f76ed6-bac1-4863-bfc0-fddb746af898

Perhaps a registry error or a file system error?

Does 'rolling back' to less bars of music make the error go away?

HTH!

Christ van Willegen
-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-10-30 Thread MING TSANG
hi, lilyponders:
(1).  What is the meaning of the following error message?I have SATB + piano 
score of 100 bars. Each SATB+pianoRH coded with 100 bars. I started to code 
piano-LH and it was all compilable upto bar  45 (no error). But after coded bar 
46, I got the error.
(2)  Window 10 generate the Chinese character onto the file naming, why the 
error message cannot display the UTF-8 Chinese character? 
Thank for the help.
Immanuel,Ming.

Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.46 
[could-this-be-the-day_能否於今天.ly]...Processing `C:/Users/user/Google 
Drive/CHOIR_2016/Could-This-Be-The-Day_�ܷ�춽���/could-this-be-the-day_�ܷ�춽���.ly'Parsing...Interpreting
 music...MIDI output to 
`could-this-be-the-day_�ܷ�춽���-soprano.mid'...Interpreting music...MIDI output 
to `could-this-be-the-day_�ܷ�춽���-alto.mid'...Interpreting music...MIDI output 
to `could-this-be-the-day_�ܷ�춽���-tenor.mid'...Interpreting music...MIDI output 
to `could-this-be-the-day_�ܷ�춽���-bass.mid'...Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96]Exited with return code 
-1073741819.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-02-26 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Ming,

The arpeggio constructs in bar 114 are incorrect. If you remove them, the score 
compiles fine.

But… the structure of your score, while not wrong as such, is quite unusual. 
You have every bar for the left hand and right hand as a named music 
expression, and then you give the names of all these bars – hundreds – as the 
music to print. While this is not syntactically incorrect – it does compile and 
produce output – it is an unnecessarily complicated and burdensome way of 
coding in lilypond. Normally you would make one music expression, type in all 
your notes and music, and refer to that. I think you would find this would ease 
your work considerably.

Andrew


On 26/02/2016, 22:19, "MING TSANG"  wrote:

Andrew and Nathan:

Here is the lily file.  I code S, A, T, B, left-piano, then right-piano.  You 
can see measure 118 for right-piano is missing.

Immanuel,
Ming

  
 
 
  

 
 
  

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-02-26 Thread Nathan Ho

On 2016-02-25 16:23, MING TSANG wrote:

I transcribe a score SA-TB + piano contains 118 measures. I enter the
last measure and I got the error message.
If I comment out measure #118, the compile went OK. I double check
measure 118 and there is no code error. What is the error message
"Exited with return code -1073741819." mean ? What to do to resolve. I
am running frescobaldi -lilypond in window 10.


In the past I remember encountering a very strange bug where LilyPond 
would segfault on a file for no apparent reason. If I changed any note, 
the error went away, and reverting would restore the segfault. There 
wasn't anything extraordinary about the file either: it was just a page 
of conventional music notation. Fortunately it only happened with a very 
particular unfinished engraving, so I just went on with music entry and 
it never happened again. Maybe you're encountering the same bug.


Whatever the case is, I don't think we can do much to help you without 
any code.



Nathan

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-02-25 Thread MING TSANG
I  transcribe a score SA-TB + piano contains 118 measures.  I enter the last 
measure and I got the error message.If I comment out measure #118, the compile 
went OK.   I double check measure 118 and there is no code error.   What is the 
error message "Exited with return code -1073741819." mean ?  What to do to 
resolve. I am running frescobaldi -lilypond in window 10.
Immanuel,Ming. 

Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.36 
[I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love.ly]...Processing 
`c:/users/user/appdata/local/temp/frescobaldi-uvdpao/tmpvmyku8/I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love.ly'Parsing...Interpreting
 music...MIDI output to 
`I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love-soprano.mid'...Interpreting 
music...MIDI output to 
`I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love-alto.mid'...Interpreting music...MIDI 
output to `I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love-tenor.mid'...Interpreting 
music...MIDI output to 
`I-will-sing-of-my-redeemer_here-is-love-bass.mid'...Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112]Exited with 
return code -1073741819.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-01-25 Thread Andrew Bernard
HI Joe,

Compiles fine on 2.19.35 on openSUSE Leap 42.1 (Linux). Extra notes work.

Have you tried running with a higher revision of lilypond? [The development 
releases after 2.18.2 are of very high quality, in general.] What platform are 
you on?

Andrew



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-01-25 Thread Joseph N. Srednicki
Please see the attached file.

 

Go to line 253.

 

The file compiles cleanly up until this point. 

 

However, when I try to add more than one note to the line 253, I receive the
error message: Exited with return code -1073741819.

 

Please let me know if I am doing something wrong or if there is a workaround
to resolve this situation.

 

Thanks

 

Joe Srednicki.

 

 

 

\version "2.18.2"
\language "english"

\header {
  title = "In dir ist Freude"
  composer = "Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)"
  opus = "BWV615"
  % Remove default LilyPond tagline
  tagline = ##f
}

\paper {
  #(set-paper-size "letter")
}

global = {
  \key g \major
  \numericTimeSignature
  \time 3/2
}

% raise a tie
raiseTie = {
\once \override TieColumn #'tie-configuration = #'((9.5 . 1) (10.0 . 1) (4.0 . 1))
}

% REPEATED SECTIONS

% Pedal motif 1
% mm 1-3, 3-4, 4-5, 11-12
pedOne = \relative c {

  % 1
  r4 d\ltoe g\rtoe b,8\ltoe c\rtoe d\rtoe c\ltoe d4\rtoe |

  % 2
  g,4\ltoe r r2 r |
}

% Repeated:
% LH Bass 1-2
% Pedal 7-8
% LH Bass 18- 19
% Pedal 24-24
motOne = \relative c' {
  % 1
  d2 d c |

  % 2
  b8 d a c b d g, b a d fs, a |
}

% Soprano mm. 3 to 12
% repeated as mm 20 to 29
sopA =  \relative c'' {
% 3
  d2 r8 g, d' g r a, d fs |

  % 4
  g8 d a c-4 b d g, b-4 a d fs, a |

  % 5
  d2-2-5 d c |

  % 6
  b8-1-3 g'-5 fs e d c b-3 d c b a c-5 |

  % 7
  b8 d, e fs g-1 a b c-1 d e fs d |

  % 8
  g4 r r2 r2 |

  % 9
  d2 d c |

  % 10
  b2. a4 b2 |

  % 11
  d2 d c |

  % 12
  b8 d,-1 e fs g-1 a b c-1 d e fs d |
}


% Alto mm. 3 to 12
% repeated as mm 20 to 29

altA = \relative c'' {
  % 3 to 4
  \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1.}

  % 5
  g8 d g a b2 a |

  % 6 to 8
  \repeat unfold 3 {\skip 1.}

  % 9
  r4 \stemUp a \shiftOn b2 a |

  % 10
  g2. fs4 d2 |

  % 11
  c'2 b a \shiftOff |

  % 12
  \skip 1.
}

% Tenor mm. 3 to 12
% repeated as mm 20 to 29

tenA = \relative c' {
  % 3
  d2 d c |

  % 4
  b8 g'-1 fs e d-1 c b d c b a c |

  % 5 to 8
  \repeat unfold 4 {\skip 1.}

  % 9
  \change Staff = "right"
  f,4\rest \stemDown fs' g2 d |

   % 10
   d2. c4 b2 |

   % 11
   fs'2 g s |

   % 12
   \skip 1.
}

% Bass mm. 3 to 12
% repeated as mm 20 to 29

bassA = \relative c' {
  % 3
  g8 d-5 g-4 a-3 b2 a |

  % 4
  g4 r r2 r2 |

  % 5
  b2 d,8\rest g d' g d,8\rest a' d fs |

  % 6
  g8 \stemUp d,,-5 e fs g a b-3 c \stemDown d e-4 fs d |

  % 7
  g8 fs-3 g a b-4 c d e \clef treble \stemUp fs g a fs |

  % 8
  b4 r r2 r |

  % 9
  \clef bass
  d,,8\rest \stemDown e' d c b a g a fs a g fs |

  % 10
  \stemUp g8-1 g,-5 a b \stemDown c d e-3 fs g-1 a-3 b g |

  % 11
  a8-1 fs-2 g-1 a-4 b c d-1 e-3 \clef treble \stemUp fs-2 g e fs |

  % 12
  g4-1 a4\rest g2\rest g2\rest |
}
% ---


% soprano
rightOne = \relative c'' {
  \global

  % 1
  R1.

  % 2
  d2 d c |

  % 3 to 12
  \sopA

  % 13
  g'8 e d c d-5 b a g a-4 g fs e |

  % 14
  fs2.-3-4 a4-2-5 g a |

  % 15
  b2. e,4 a2~ |

  % 16
  a8 c b a g fs e fs g4-4 fs-3 |

  % 17
  e2~-2 e8 fs-3 g-4 a-1 \stemDown b c d e |

  % 18
  \stemUp fs,8-2 c' b a b-4 a g a fs-2 a-3 g-1 fs-2 |

  % 19
  d'2 d c

  % 20 to 29
  \sopA

  % 30
  g'8 e d c d2-5 c-2-4 |

  % 31
  b2. a4 g8 a b c |

  % 32
  d2 r8 g-5 fs e fs2-5 |

  % 33
  r8 f8 e d e-5 d c b c2-4 |

  % 34
  r8 c-5 b a b4.-5 b8 a4. a8 |

  % 35
  g2 r r |

  % 36
  r8 a b c r c-3 d e d c b a |

  % 37
  b2. a4 g8fs g4 |

  % 38
  r4 d'8 c b a g a b4 a |

  % 39
  g4. d8 g2~ g8 fs g a |

  % 40
  b2 c d |

  % 41
  e4. d8 c2 r2 |
}

% alto
rightTwo = \relative c'' {
  \global

  % 1 to 2
  \repeat unfold 2 {R1.}

  % 3 to 23
  \altA

  % 13
  \skip 1.

  % 14
  \stemDown d,2. c?4 b c |

  % 15
  d8 f-3 e-1 d-2 c2~-1 c8 d-2 b-1 c |

  % 16 to 18
  \repeat unfold 3 {\skip 1.}

  % 19
  g'4 r r2 r2 |

  % 20 to 29
  \altA

  % 30
  r2 r8 \stemDown b a g a2 |

  % 31
  g1.~ |

  % 32
  g8 fs g a b2-1 r8 c-3 b-2 a-1 |

  % 33
  g2 r r8 b a g |

  % 34
  fs2-2 r8 fs8 g4~ g8 e fs4 |

  % 35
  g2 r r8 d e f |

  % 36
  e2 a1 |

  % 37
  r8 a8 g fs g4 fs d d |

  % 38
  r4 a' g r4 r8 d r c~ |

  % 39
  c8 a b4~ b2 r2 |

  % 40
  r8 a' g f r g f? e r f? e d |

  % 41
  r8 b' c g e2 r2 |
}

% tenor
leftOne = \relative c' {
  \global

  % 1 to 2
  \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1.}

  % 3 to 12
  \tenA

   % 13
   \change Staff ="left" \clef bass \stemUp b2 b cs2 |

   % 14 to 15
   \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1.}

   % 16
   b1 r8 b r a~ |

   % 17
   a8-2 c-1 b-2 a-3 g-1 fs-2 e-3 fs-2 g-1 a-4 b-3 c-2 |

   % 18 to 19
   \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1.}

   % 20 to 29
   \tenA

   % 30 to 31
   \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1.}

   % 32
   \change Staff = "left" \stemUp b8 a-4 b c d2-1 c\finger "2-1" |

   % 33
   \stemUp b2. a4 g b |

   % 34
   a2\finger "2-1" r8 a b c d2 |

   % 35
   d2 r8 b c d b2 |

   % 36 to 37
   \repeat unfold 2 {\skip 1. }

   % 38
   r4 d~ d8 c b a g4 fs |

   % 39
   g1 r2 |

   % 40
   \skip 1.|

  

Re: Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-01-25 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Joseph,

Try to googlize "Exited with return code -1073741819"
Some interesting things over there.

HTH,
Pierre

2016-01-26 1:08 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>:

>
>
> Am 26.01.2016 um 01:04 schrieb Joseph N. Srednicki:
>
> Please see the attached file.
>
>
>
> Go to line 253.
>
>
>
> The file compiles cleanly up until this point.
>
>
>
> However, when I try to add more than one note to the line 253, I receive
> the error message: *Exited with return code -1073741819.*
>
>
>
>
> Please give us some more reference to what line you are talking about.
> I find that line 253 is:
>
> % alto
>
> So nothing to add notes to ...
>
> Urs
>
> Please let me know if I am doing something wrong or if there is a
> workaround to resolve this situation.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Joe Srednicki.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing 
> listlilypond-user@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Subject: Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code -1073741819

2016-01-25 Thread Joseph N. Srednicki
You asked for a better reference.

The following shows the appropriate section of the file:
==
% 41
  e4. d8 c2 r2 |

  % 42
  e4. e8
}

% alto
rightTwo = \relative c'' {
  \global

  % 1 to 2
  \repeat unfold 2 {R1.}

===

Search for comment "% 42". If you go the line following comment "% 42", the
first note is "e4.", followed by note "e8".

If I remove the note  "e8", the file compiles. However, if I add any note
after the "e4.", such as "e8", I receive the message: Exited with return
code -1073741819 

I was building this score measure by measure. Everything worked fine until I
reached the line following "% 42".

Please let me know if this message is clear.

I also regret that the sample is not tiny, but I don't know any other way to
show the example.

Thanks for your willingness to look at this file. I hope that I can get it
to work.

Joe Srednicki
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+jos.srednicki=verizon@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+jos.srednicki=verizon@gnu.org] On Behalf
Of lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 7:08 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 158, Issue 148

Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
lilypond-user@gnu.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:Determining what parameters exist for an item (Thomas Morley)
   2. Re:simplifying chromatic scale notation (Urs Liska)
   3. Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code
      -1073741819. (Joseph N. Srednicki)
   4. Re:Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return
  code  -1073741819. (Urs Liska)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:13:44 +0100
From: Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
To: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Charles O. Lawrence" <charlesolawre...@bellsouth.net>,
Lilypond-User Mailing List <lilypond-user@gnu.org>, David
Kastrup
<d...@gnu.org>, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>
Subject: Re: Determining what parameters exist for an item
Message-ID:
<cabsfgyv_f8cuobmtg85ydzkoluntt3-ju6mbiq9kkkdo55b...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2016-01-25 21:00 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Kieren MacMillan 
> <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> > if a property is settable, this does not mean your setting takes 
>> > any effect.
>> > I don't speak of user-errors in syntax, missing context, etc, but 
>> > sometimes an engraver does not listen to a certain property, maybe 
>> > because it's hard-coded or not really needed or for other good reasons.
>>
>> Excellent point. I?m sure it?s a pie-in-the-sky thought? but?
>>
>> Is there a way, in your [wonderful] list of _all_ properties, to have 
>> Lily automatically say which will have an effect?

No.

To illustrate:
TextScript has 'font-name as a property, but setting it will not always have
an effect!!

'font-name in musicglyph-markup-command is hardcoded to #f, otherwise
LilyPond would try to take it from "TeX Gyre Chorus" in the example below,
with little chance for nice output, I'd say ...

{
  \override TextScript.font-name = "TeX Gyre Chorus"
  a'1-\markup { "This is a clef:  " \musicglyph #"clefs.G" } }

This is only one single example (there are other markup-commands doing
similar) for one single grob...

>> Or is that as simple as ?adjusting a property will have an effect if 
>> and only if it?s listed on the grob?s ?homepage? in the IR??

Again, no.
See, David's explanation, below.

>
>
> Just because a grob supports a certain interface doesn't guarantee 
> that there's code written to handle all of the interface's properties 
> for that particular grob.  Also, an overridable property doesn't 
> necessarily have a default value listed in the IR: 'color, for example.
>
> DN

Sorry,
  Harm



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:24:29 +0100
From: Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation
Message-ID: <56a6aead.1060...@openlilylib.o

Re: Compiling a file results in message: Exited with return code -1073741819.

2016-01-25 Thread Urs Liska


Am 26.01.2016 um 01:04 schrieb Joseph N. Srednicki:
>
> Please see the attached file.
>
>  
>
> Go to line 253.
>
>  
>
> The file compiles cleanly up until this point.
>
>  
>
> However, when I try to add more than one note to the line 253, I
> receive the error message: *Exited with return code -1073741819.*
>
> * *
>

Please give us some more reference to what line you are talking about.
I find that line 253 is:

% alto

So nothing to add notes to ...

Urs

> Please let me know if I am doing something wrong or if there is a
> workaround to resolve this situation.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
>  
>
> Joe Srednicki.**
>
> * *
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user