Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[zzk]

Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I
> took
> a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
> mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
> them macros.
> 
> I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to the
> sublime text approach of multiple selection.

I agree with your point that emacs' replace capabilities look more powerful.
However, at this stage, it would be an overkill for me, as I am not a heavy
text editor user. 

I guess, it is great that we have so many options today (with a number of
open source apps). 

Zoran



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183312.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[H. S. Teoh]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:12:54PM -0700, zzk wrote:
> Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> > Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like
> > I took a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file)
> > find/replace mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially
> > since you can't use them macros.
> > 
> > I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to
> > the sublime text approach of multiple selection.
> 
> I agree with your point that emacs' replace capabilities look more
> powerful.  However, at this stage, it would be an overkill for me, as
> I am not a heavy text editor user. 
> 
> I guess, it is great that we have so many options today (with a number
> of open source apps). 
[...]

I wasn't sure if this would constitute a meaningful data point, but I do
use Lilypond extensively and only ever use vim (without syntax
highlighting). For the most part, navigation is no problem for me as I
use a very specific formatting, with comment markers indicating
different sections of a piece, so even in a full orchestral score it's
still usable to keep all the parts in a single file. (Layout specific
details like \layout and \paper blocks, macro definitions, and other
necessary boilerplate, are kept in different files, though, to minimize
distraction from the actual music.)


T

-- 
Written on the window of a clothing store: No shirt, no shoes, no service.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Flaming Hakama by Elaine]

> 1+ for Sublime Text. I am very happy with a Sublime Text / Frescobaldi
combo.
>
> One of my favorite features with Sublime Text is multiple selections. It
is
> a time saver when it comes to selecting and changing the name for a number
> of note, variable, or function instances.
>
> Zoran

Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I took
a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
them macros.

I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to the
sublime text approach of multiple selection.

Some of the things I do prefer are the "airplane view" navigation within
the current file,  the project/workspace features for directory-tree
navigation across multiple files, tabs for open files,  and the
find-in-files feature that searches within a directory across files and
produces results, with context, whose results are linked, so you can jump
to editing any of the results files.

Plus there are a wealth of syntax highlight themes, existing key commands
and custom key commands.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Knute Snortum]

On Windows I like Notepad++ (https://notepad-plus-plus.org/).  It doesn't
have a LilyPond syntax highlighter for it yet, but if there's interest, I
could write one.


Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:21 AM, John Aten 
wrote:

> Hmmm... I found the files lilypond-words, lilypond-words.vim and
> lilypond.vim at
> /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/vim/syntax
> (I'm running Mac OSX Snow Leopard) and it show up in the runtime path, but
> I still do not get the highlighting. The permissions match those of other
> syntax files. I'm stumped.
>
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:28 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Thanks for the link, it worked like a dream.  However, I found the
> > syntax highlighter at
> > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/vim
> > so changed the set runtimepath line accordingly.
> >
> > On 07/11/15 16:12, John Aten wrote:
> >> In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux and Z
> >> shell for such purposes, but I haven't been able to get the
> >> Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the
> >> instructions here:
> >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp
> > ort.html
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
> >>> considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor -
> >>> IDE
> >>>
> >>> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't
> >>> actually exist.
> >>>
> >>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least
> >>> syntax highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of
> >>> the following: - code completion - input helpers - music
> >>> functions - indenter/linter
> >>>
> >>> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is
> >>> any form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.
> >>>
> >>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad
> >>> application but doesn't try to be an IDE?
> >>>
> >>> Best Urs
> >>>
> >>> ___ lilypond-user
> >>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >>
> >>
> >> ___ lilypond-user
> >> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWPibLAAoJEAF3yXsqtyBlltsP/R81d5iPPLr9a+yfm22HRKnd
> > zj4XGpPFlJz+cHWa4tiEnqlR+a2I3uEy7b4YI9fMr/N3eH8L59gBgUFdiWX3AQCd
> > Dh0++IVe4ri3cpRMDFGZV0agUUQhUAx9UMOpqj5JZ2nBiKIydUuetRNhLPqM7Sq8
> > /WSnwD4bGsr21FRcNBng3zVhS8MnKHCBSIWNpy0WG1a6RGe40Hdr19LvbL+3WleU
> > kaImEf3FZRpSXOI6SFPNyGiAnyb11kg5KEbFaRtqpQRdY7P4knjGPc8Z9piQtVuG
> > E1+NfVLiLP6BOVYTRCRWFCyLqKUHSTzJ/5ouCdq3lLBo5EKh39jePiFeCUbHx5qR
> > 0rx2q2Qm41WgpA2mTdNSKIeUtJ3I6aZ6XkqUnAOONvwxy1IO0MqMu+MmWQhnu4th
> > g77pzwhKJ7XGQHbtCaSWAaX2WCd6ciRYWZr7fvZzCOpyVqm7kQI6gXIebpEoQyvd
> > pS1xghjWUoDbtzTLxDPrqBEp6SsY9yxWWl5q9aP1nDXlYy1BM53wWjUY4JQ4gq42
> > 86aKUDh55J1vTS4s1tMgGKJQI3UiKZTLtwrL+ZUk83Z3ENy8OrK8+UBA6aNIyieD
> > BLSOqU2NngsgaVBXbG1cJWHykPqIjGCGaEx+ivnE4AB6IsxuZ/wOHKZ9cI62oGW7
> > y0KD5DFyGQmUMPGkjGLC
> > =eYCy
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> > ___
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

RE: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Martin Tarenskeen]

Have you tried

 

http://www.hochstrasser.org/index.php/CoolSoftware/NPPLilyPond

 

?

 

MT

 

Namens Knute Snortum
Verzonden: zaterdag 7 november 2015 19:04
Aan: John Aten <welcome.to.eye.o.r...@gmail.com>
CC: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Onderwerp: Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

 

On Windows I like Notepad++ (https://notepad-plus-plus.org/).  It doesn't have 
a LilyPond syntax highlighter for it yet, but if there's interest, I could 
write one.




 

Knute Snortum

(via Gmail)

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[J Martin Rushton]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sorry, I only deal with Linux, not Macs.

On 07/11/15 17:21, John Aten wrote:
> Hmmm... I found the files lilypond-words, lilypond-words.vim and
> lilypond.vim at
> /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/v
im/syntax
> (I'm running Mac OSX Snow Leopard) and it show up in the runtime
> path, but I still do not get the highlighting. The permissions
> match those of other syntax files. I'm stumped.
> 
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:28 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the link, it worked like a dream.  However, I found the 
> syntax highlighter at 
> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/vim so changed the
> set runtimepath line accordingly.
> 
> On 07/11/15 16:12, John Aten wrote:
 In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux
 and Z shell for such purposes, but I haven't been able to get
 the Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed
 the instructions here: 
 http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-s
upp
>
 
ort.html
 
 
 On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
 
> Hi all,
> 
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was
> always considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced
> editor - IDE
> 
> but suddenly have the impression that the second one
> doesn't actually exist.
> 
> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at
> least syntax highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one
> or more of the following: - code completion - input helpers
> - music functions - indenter/linter
> 
> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an
> IDE) is any form of integrating compilation, console
> output, viewer.
> 
> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad 
> application but doesn't try to be an IDE?
> 
> Best Urs
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
>> 
>> ___ lilypond-user
>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=ciPW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[John Aten]

Hmmm... I found the files lilypond-words, lilypond-words.vim and lilypond.vim 
at 
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/vim/syntax 
(I'm running Mac OSX Snow Leopard) and it show up in the runtime path, but I 
still do not get the highlighting. The permissions match those of other syntax 
files. I'm stumped. 

On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:28 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Thanks for the link, it worked like a dream.  However, I found the
> syntax highlighter at
> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/vim
> so changed the set runtimepath line accordingly.
> 
> On 07/11/15 16:12, John Aten wrote:
>> In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux and Z
>> shell for such purposes, but I haven't been able to get the
>> Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the
>> instructions here:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp
> ort.html
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always 
>>> considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor -
>>> IDE
>>> 
>>> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't
>>> actually exist.
>>> 
>>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least
>>> syntax highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of
>>> the following: - code completion - input helpers - music
>>> functions - indenter/linter
>>> 
>>> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is
>>> any form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.
>>> 
>>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad
>>> application but doesn't try to be an IDE?
>>> 
>>> Best Urs
>>> 
>>> ___ lilypond-user
>>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> 
>> 
>> ___ lilypond-user
>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWPibLAAoJEAF3yXsqtyBlltsP/R81d5iPPLr9a+yfm22HRKnd
> zj4XGpPFlJz+cHWa4tiEnqlR+a2I3uEy7b4YI9fMr/N3eH8L59gBgUFdiWX3AQCd
> Dh0++IVe4ri3cpRMDFGZV0agUUQhUAx9UMOpqj5JZ2nBiKIydUuetRNhLPqM7Sq8
> /WSnwD4bGsr21FRcNBng3zVhS8MnKHCBSIWNpy0WG1a6RGe40Hdr19LvbL+3WleU
> kaImEf3FZRpSXOI6SFPNyGiAnyb11kg5KEbFaRtqpQRdY7P4knjGPc8Z9piQtVuG
> E1+NfVLiLP6BOVYTRCRWFCyLqKUHSTzJ/5ouCdq3lLBo5EKh39jePiFeCUbHx5qR
> 0rx2q2Qm41WgpA2mTdNSKIeUtJ3I6aZ6XkqUnAOONvwxy1IO0MqMu+MmWQhnu4th
> g77pzwhKJ7XGQHbtCaSWAaX2WCd6ciRYWZr7fvZzCOpyVqm7kQI6gXIebpEoQyvd
> pS1xghjWUoDbtzTLxDPrqBEp6SsY9yxWWl5q9aP1nDXlYy1BM53wWjUY4JQ4gq42
> 86aKUDh55J1vTS4s1tMgGKJQI3UiKZTLtwrL+ZUk83Z3ENy8OrK8+UBA6aNIyieD
> BLSOqU2NngsgaVBXbG1cJWHykPqIjGCGaEx+ivnE4AB6IsxuZ/wOHKZ9cI62oGW7
> y0KD5DFyGQmUMPGkjGLC
> =eYCy
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[John Aten]

In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux and Z shell for such 
purposes, but I haven't been able to get the Lilypond syntax highlighting to 
work in Vim. I followed the instructions here: 
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-support.html  

On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
> considering the steps
> - plain text editor
> - enhanced editor
> - IDE
> 
> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually exist.
> 
> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
> - code completion
> - input helpers
> - music functions
> - indenter/linter
> 
> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is any
> form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.
> 
> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
> but doesn't try to be an IDE?
> 
> Best
> Urs
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[J Martin Rushton]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the link, it worked like a dream.  However, I found the
syntax highlighter at
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/vim
so changed the set runtimepath line accordingly.

On 07/11/15 16:12, John Aten wrote:
> In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux and Z
> shell for such purposes, but I haven't been able to get the
> Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the
> instructions here:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp
ort.html
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always 
>> considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor -
>> IDE
>> 
>> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't
>> actually exist.
>> 
>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least
>> syntax highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of
>> the following: - code completion - input helpers - music
>> functions - indenter/linter
>> 
>> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is
>> any form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.
>> 
>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad
>> application but doesn't try to be an IDE?
>> 
>> Best Urs
>> 
>> ___ lilypond-user
>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 
> ___ lilypond-user
> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=eYCy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[John Aten]

No worries. I'll keep working on it. 

I couldn't get the syntax highlighting even when I moved the file to a 
directory, in the runtime path, that other plugins load out of just fine. 
Oddly, the syntax highlighting works if I source the lilypond.vim file from 
within vim with the source command. 

On Nov 7, 2015, at 3:02 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Sorry, I only deal with Linux, not Macs.
> 
> On 07/11/15 17:21, John Aten wrote:
>> Hmmm... I found the files lilypond-words, lilypond-words.vim and
>> lilypond.vim at
>> /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/v
> im/syntax
>> (I'm running Mac OSX Snow Leopard) and it show up in the runtime
>> path, but I still do not get the highlighting. The permissions
>> match those of other syntax files. I'm stumped.
>> 
>> On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:28 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for the link, it worked like a dream.  However, I found the 
>> syntax highlighter at 
>> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/vim so changed the
>> set runtimepath line accordingly.
>> 
>> On 07/11/15 16:12, John Aten wrote:
> In principle, I am a big fan of a combination of Vim, Tmux
> and Z shell for such purposes, but I haven't been able to get
> the Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed
> the instructions here: 
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-s
> upp
>> 
> 
> ort.html
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was
>> always considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced
>> editor - IDE
>> 
>> but suddenly have the impression that the second one
>> doesn't actually exist.
>> 
>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at
>> least syntax highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one
>> or more of the following: - code completion - input helpers
>> - music functions - indenter/linter
>> 
>> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an
>> IDE) is any form of integrating compilation, console
>> output, viewer.
>> 
>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad 
>> application but doesn't try to be an IDE?
>> 
>> Best Urs
>> 
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
>>> 
>>> ___ lilypond-user
>>> mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org 
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWPmbgAAoJEAF3yXsqtyBlfe8QAM0Otxje1mkp0wNKS5YYA4Fr
> 8fAWwNv1vLNKXQ3yGKxBlgUWNNx1qw4UyyqmlRe9H0efH3sbu0MPTv5HESBsbZfR
> I3mKFEGMXEN53XUHkQMG8kuoosaWBD7zzXNmT7z+XdWP2hUVzGaeMXNXqbPVRPyG
> sZ7zPK9Sz3vmzHTOpFVOA9p/uja8UmTSaTGY1Vtz+zzJst/vtgqatVp3NKAzyOWL
> 5IV1x5GVgmOPI7AurawugkMX8grEPG0izgKa3dA1nSxLkyfH1vwmYCthNoUFYSAe
> jNJCzQ3GIQbP/1m6GB27DqMP1OMbh1Ebk5WCxImmuhVXr2ae8/2c4Rj2mO6glTZ3
> WwWBEfzCUv8/reL9muAMTEAywn/rLyICO5J2Xy7zo23q2MZxjsuKhhv/2WaLtWka
> V2ww9Q6S+O6vQxD5Z6cy5pXf7FKqtL6NBg061bqEfHOv5uJypeFjHS5DHtW78A7+
> e4t8yRkPSRPCcbS53karJqvUgAwfrr7eoDjJJCxKziPzs9GvNI0lSsZWkPYS/mKP
> pf2tbWu2WZ6tE7wH8NoH/Q7ew7atDOnpKXwQVQ9bYs4F4iqz2lu4SrWaxkwq2WXn
> FWo47Rd/pJAEF+2+FQk0fbQgD+rctkSeHtu+3yznIPdqvPzdWvWBuRmcyfx+1K9W
> bhfCtASGVOgXdD3c7k+U
> =ciPW
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Urs Liska]

Am 07.11.2015 um 01:51 schrieb MarcM:
> why not using an editor with a preview like http://frescobaldi.org/ ?

Well, I'm not looking for a tool for my own use, and
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/commits/manuscript-viewer?author=uliska=1
(through page 11) may serve as an indication that I *am* aware of
Frescobaldi :-/

There may be numerous reasons why one would want to edit LilyPond files
with a non-IDE editor but still want things like syntax highlighting or
the other tools mentioned in this thread.
But what I'm actually after is a non-comprehensive list of types of
LilyPond editing environments.

Best
Urs

>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[MarcM]

why not using an editor with a preview like http://frescobaldi.org/ ?




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Robin Bannister]

On 05.11.2015 21:58, Thomas Morley wrote:

2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :

...
Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?
...

I mostly use jEdit.


Me too.

IDE-wise, I feel safer with minimalist homegrown, even if primitive.
Editorwise, I don't want/need templates, prompting or autocompletion.

Some relevant things jEdit offers vs Notepad:
 - several views of one buffer, eg for several voices in one file
 - splittable text area, eg for several voices in several files
 - hypersearch, eg for navigating between similar things
 - syntax highlighting - maybe a bit weak but good enough for me
And I occasionally use
 - bracket matching - especially with Scheme!
 - rectangular selection
 - multiple selection
 - (my halfbaked transposition) macros


There was a lilypondtool-plugin for jEdit warranting LilyPond-specific
highlighting and autocompletition, though the developer stopped work
on it. Last release was 12.1.2010, afaict.


I found jEdit's LilyPond indenting unsatisfactory, and worked with
Bertalan Fodor to improve it (just before that date).
It was still confused by Scheme sections then, but I now have
a rather clunky way to cope with one level of nesting - all I need.


Cheers,
Robin







___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[zzk]

1+ for Sublime Text. I am very happy with a Sublime Text / Frescobaldi combo.

One of my favorite features with Sublime Text is multiple selections. It is
a time saver when it comes to selecting and changing the name for a number
of note, variable, or function instances. 

Zoran




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183208.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Paul Morris]

> On Nov 5, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Urs Liska  wrote:
> 
> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
> but doesn't try to be an IDE?

There’s a bundle that provides LilyPond syntax highlighting for TextMate:

https://github.com/textmate/lilypond.tmbundle

TextMate is mac only ( http://macromates.com/ ) but I think I have seen other 
text editors support the TextMate bundle format.

-Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Johan Vromans]

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska  wrote:

> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
> but doesn't try to be an IDE?

Eh, Emacs?

-- Johan

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Urs Liska]

Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
> Urs Liska  wrote:
>
>> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
>> but doesn't try to be an IDE?
> Eh, Emacs?

Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all IDEs.

> -- Johan
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Nick Payne]

On 06/11/2015 04:21, Urs Liska wrote:


Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska  wrote:


Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?

Eh, Emacs?

Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all IDEs.


Atom has a Lilypond syntax highlighting package. https://atom.io/

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[T. Michael Sommers]

On 11/5/2015 12:21 PM, Urs Liska wrote:

Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans:

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Urs Liska  wrote:


Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?

Eh, Emacs?


Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all IDEs.


Emacs doesn't try to be an IDE.  It tries to be an operating system.

--
T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Thomas Morley]

2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
> considering the steps
> - plain text editor
> - enhanced editor
> - IDE
>
> but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually exist.
>
> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
> - code completion
> - input helpers
> - music functions
> - indenter/linter
>
> What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is any
> form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.
>
> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
> but doesn't try to be an IDE?
>
> Best
> Urs
>


I mostly use jEdit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedit
nice colored and customizable highlighting and a lot of features which
can be added.

For simple tasks gedit, in terminal nano.

There was a lilypondtool-plugin for jEdit warranting LilyPond-specific
highlighting and autocompletition, though the developer stopped work
on it. Last release was 12.1.2010, afaict. He posted it on this list,
too lazy to search it, though.

Honestly, the LilyPondTool was always a little buggy and I rarely
needed it, but I love the jEdit-way ;)

Cheers,
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Cameron Horsburgh]

I use an app called Koder on iOS. It does syntax highlighting and some
keyword completion for LilyPond files straight out of the box. It's not
particularly useful for heavy or even medium weight lifting, but it's great
for a quick proofread when I'm away from my main machine.



Cameron Horsburgh


On 6 November 2015 at 10:03, Flaming Hakama by Elaine <
ela...@flaminghakama.com> wrote:

>
> Sublime Text is a rather friendly and modern text editor.
> http://www.sublimetext.com
>
> I becomes Lilypond-aware if you use a language package like this one:
> https://github.com/yrammos/SubLilyPond
>
>
> David Elaine Alt
> 415 . 341 .4954   "*Confusion is
> highly underrated*"
> ela...@flaminghakama.com
> self-immolation.info
> skype: flaming_hakama
> Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Phil Holmes]

- Original Message - 
From: "Urs Liska" 

To: "lilypond-user" 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 3:18 PM
Subject: LilyPond-aware text editors



Hi all,

does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always
considering the steps
- plain text editor
- enhanced editor
- IDE

but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually 
exist.


What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
- code completion
- input helpers
- music functions
- indenter/linter

What it would *not* have (because then I'd consider it an IDE) is any
form of integrating compilation, console output, viewer.

Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application
but doesn't try to be an IDE?

Best
Urs



On Windows, I use EditPad Pro.  No help with input/completion, but brace 
matching, syntax highlighting, autoindent, etc.


--
Phil Holmes 



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Urs Liska]

Am 05.11.2015 um 16:27 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […]
>> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
>> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
>> - code completion
>> - input helpers
>> - music functions
>> - indenter/linter
> http://subethaedit.net/
> ??

Does this have LilyPond support? I can't see anything detailed on the
website.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi Urs,

> Does this have LilyPond support? I can't see anything detailed on the website.

Amongst other things, syntax-colouring is totally customizable. I wrote a basic 
Lilypond syntax-colour plist 11 years ago (cf. 
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-01/msg00668.html), but I 
have no idea if it still works; in any case, it wouldn’t be hard to fix/improve 
it.

Hope this helps!
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi Urs,

> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […]
> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax
> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following:
> - code completion
> - input helpers
> - music functions
> - indenter/linter

http://subethaedit.net/
??

[Big] Bonus: networked and collaborative.
[Big] Drawback (??): Mac OS X only.

Hope this helps!
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user