Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-28 Thread David L. Craig
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:45:11AM -0600, Dave Jones wrote:
 David L. Craig wrote:
  [snip.]
  Sigh...  We're running VM/ESA 2.2 which means CP doesn't
  know about the IEEE floating point hardware.  As I see it,
  we can upgrade VM, tell the kernel to use emulation even
  though the hardware is there, or put Debian (and VM) into
  their own LPARs.  Does crypto make heavy use of floating
  point?
 No, it does not. It makes (heavy) use of integer arithmetic,
 though. Note that a crypto processor is available for the
 7060, to offload this work from the CPU.

  Is there a way to virtually network between LPARs?

 Not on a 7060, as far as I know. It does not support
 hipersockets, so any network connections between LPARS will,
 I think, require some sort of route through the OS/2 side or
 some other external connection.

  Does the kernel parameter support using emulation even
  when the hardware is available?  If you can answer off the
  top of your head, let me know.  Otherwise, I'll figure
  this out next week.

 If the Linux kernel detects the crypto hardware, it will use
 it; if not, it uses emulation (all that integer arithmetic
 mentioned above).

 If you need an encryption solution for the CMS environment,
 drop me a note off list.

I looked at the code (don't you just love free software?) and
it looks like I can get away with zapping off the AFP bit in
the first set of control registers loaded by the kernel in
head31.S shortly after bootstrapping completes; i.e.,

.Lctl:  .long   0x04b50002  # cr0: various things

becomes

.Lctl:  .long   0x00b50002  # cr0: various things

When the same module tests for the IEEE feature by attempting
an EFPC, it merely sets a flag in machine_Flags if no program
check is incurred.  The Program New PSW has been modified to
merely point at the instruction following the OI, so the AFP
bit is left alone (it ought to check that CP IEEE support is
also functional if no program check occurs and it is in a
virtual machine and, if so, skip the machine_flags change and
reset the AFP bit in CR0, but since I'm probably the only
person in the world that would care, I'll just zap the bit).

Unless, of course, CP will panic when it sees the funny
program check caused by attempting EFPC with the real AFP bit
off.  I guess I'd better check out if that's the case...

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-28 Thread David L. Craig
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:09:58PM -0500, David L. Craig wrote:

 I looked at the code (don't you just love free software?) and
 it looks like I can get away with zapping off the AFP bit in
 the first set of control registers loaded by the kernel in
 head31.S shortly after bootstrapping completes; i.e.,

 .Lctl:  .long   0x04b50002  # cr0: various things

 becomes

 .Lctl:  .long   0x00b50002  # cr0: various things

Oops, wrong bit--make that

  .Lctl:  .long   0x04b10002  # cr0: various things

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-28 Thread Dave Jones

Hi, David.

I'm a bit confused here.why are you turning off the AFP bit in the Linux 
kernel? Is it
causing you some problems on teh 7060?

David L. Craig wrote:

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:09:58PM -0500, David L. Craig wrote:

I looked at the code (don't you just love free software?) and
it looks like I can get away with zapping off the AFP bit in
the first set of control registers loaded by the kernel in
head31.S shortly after bootstrapping completes; i.e.,

.Lctl:  .long   0x04b50002  # cr0: various things

becomes

.Lctl:  .long   0x00b50002  # cr0: various things


Oops, wrong bit--make that

  .Lctl:  .long   0x04b10002  # cr0: various things

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


--
DJ

V/Soft
  z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
  consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-28 Thread David L. Craig
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:19:45PM -0600, Dave Jones wrote:

 I'm a bit confused here.why are you turning off the
 AFP bit in the Linux kernel? Is it causing you some
 problems on teh 7060?

I want to run it in a virtual machine under VM/ESA 2.2,
but support for the IEEE floating point hardware by CP
wasn't available before 2.3 with PTFs.  If BFP didn't
use HFP registers, it would probably be okay, but CP
needs to ensure Linux gets his BFP registers back after
being interrupted.  Or I can tell Linux there's no BFP
hardware and then he'll do the emulation instead.  Does
that make sense?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-28 Thread Dave Jones

Got it, thanks, David.

David L. Craig wrote:

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:19:45PM -0600, Dave Jones wrote:

I'm a bit confused here.why are you turning off the
AFP bit in the Linux kernel? Is it causing you some
problems on teh 7060?


I want to run it in a virtual machine under VM/ESA 2.2,
but support for the IEEE floating point hardware by CP
wasn't available before 2.3 with PTFs.  If BFP didn't
use HFP registers, it would probably be okay, but CP
needs to ensure Linux gets his BFP registers back after
being interrupted.  Or I can tell Linux there's no BFP
hardware and then he'll do the emulation instead.  Does
that make sense?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


--
DJ

V/Soft
  z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
  consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-26 Thread David Boyes
There is a 7030 users guide, but I would recommend a large bottle of Makers
Mark and some cold water as a prereq. The UI will make MUCH more sense
following judicious application of same.


On 1/24/09 12:34 PM, scott svet...@ameritech.net wrote:

   Speaking of the 7060, is there some good tutorial from both an
 operators standpoint and Systems Programmer on how to work with the 7060?

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-26 Thread scott
   Yes, I noticed that these manuals for the machine are not easy to be
followed.  Which is why I was wondering if there was not some tutorial
out there.

David Boyes wrote:
 There is a 7030 users guide, but I would recommend a large bottle of Makers
 Mark and some cold water as a prereq. The UI will make MUCH more sense
 following judicious application of same.


 On 1/24/09 12:34 PM, scott svet...@ameritech.net wrote:


   Speaking of the 7060, is there some good tutorial from both an
 operators standpoint and Systems Programmer on how to work with the 7060?


 --
 For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
 http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390



--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-24 Thread scott
  Speaking of the 7060, is there some good tutorial from both an
operators standpoint and Systems Programmer on how to work with the 7060?

Thanks,

Scott



Dave Jones wrote:

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-24 Thread Dave Jones

Scott, I think this might be what you are looking for:

Multiprise 3000 Technical Introduction

http://www.reliablecomputer.com/download/planterredbook.pdf


DJ
scott wrote:

  Speaking of the 7060, is there some good tutorial from both an
operators standpoint and Systems Programmer on how to work with the 7060?

Thanks,

Scott



Dave Jones wrote:

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


--
DJ

V/Soft
  z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
  consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-23 Thread David L. Craig
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:46:08PM -0600, Adam Thornton wrote:

 On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mark Post wrote:

 On 1/13/2009 at  1:00 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote:
 I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
 -snip-
 Do current distros still support this
 platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
 current encryption software work on the older distro?
 
 SLES10 and RHEL5 are 64-bit only.  Previous versions are 31-bit or
 64-bit.  The non-commercial distributions, Debian/390, Slack/390,
 CentOS are mostly 31-bit.  So far as I know, they all include GPG
 and OpenSSL.

 Yeah.  How acceptable this will be depends, really, on the bandwidth
 you need encrypted, because doing crypto on a multiprise is pretty
 slow.  Something that we've had success with (depending on your
 requirements) is to use an outboard x86 box, a private network, and
 some iptables magic to make it transparent to everything else on the
 network but do your crypto where it's cheap.

 There are, of course, organizations that will provide support for non-
 major distributions, and at least one that really, really likes
 Debian.  Ask me offline.

Sigh...  We're running VM/ESA 2.2 which means CP doesn't
know about the IEEE floating point hardware.  As I see it,
we can upgrade VM, tell the kernel to use emulation even
though the hardware is there, or put Debian (and VM) into
their own LPARs.  Does crypto make heavy use of floating
point?  Is there a way to virtually network between LPARs?
Does the kernel parameter support using emulation even
when the hardware is available?  If you can answer off the
top of your head, let me know.  Otherwise, I'll figure
this out next week.

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-23 Thread Mark Post
 On 1/23/2009 at  4:48 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote: 
-snip-
 Sigh...  We're running VM/ESA 2.2 which means CP doesn't
 know about the IEEE floating point hardware.  As I see it,
 we can upgrade VM, tell the kernel to use emulation even
 though the hardware is there, or put Debian (and VM) into
 their own LPARs.  Does crypto make heavy use of floating
 point?  Is there a way to virtually network between LPARs?
 Does the kernel parameter support using emulation even
 when the hardware is available?  If you can answer off the
 top of your head, let me know.  Otherwise, I'll figure
 this out next week.

The kernel checks for the hardware.  If it finds it, it uses it.  If not, it 
emulates it.  The version of VM you're running on shouldn't matter in that 
regard.


Mark Post

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David L. Craig
I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
(7060-H30) with 2 GB in basic mode running VM/ESA 2.2 and
hosting VSE/ESA 2.2 in V=R.  We may be required by auditors
to encrypt files for transmission to other hosts.  I'm
saying it's feasible to install a Linux distribution into
a V=V virtual machine and perform the encryption there,
either with gpg or by using openssl.  We're currently
averaging about 20% CPU utilization.  Can anyone see any
holes in this?  Do current distros still support this
platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
current encryption software work on the older distro?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread Mark Post
 On 1/13/2009 at  1:00 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote: 
 I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
-snip-
 Do current distros still support this
 platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
 current encryption software work on the older distro?

SLES10 and RHEL5 are 64-bit only.  Previous versions are 31-bit or 64-bit.  The 
non-commercial distributions, Debian/390, Slack/390, CentOS are mostly 31-bit.  
So far as I know, they all include GPG and OpenSSL.


Mark Post

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread Tom Duerbusch
There are not many holes, but things to consider.  We had a MP3000 H30 also.

1.  It doesn't perform Linux stuff as well as other mainframes.  There is a CPU 
instruction added in newer systems, that made Linux performance much better.  
So, don't take poor performance on the MP3000 as an indication of performance 
on new boxes.  But if you lave the CPU time available, it works.

2.  You have to run SLES 7 or SLES8 (in 31 bit mode).  As these are older 
distros, they may run out of support.  That may affect how auditors view the 
setup.

3.  As 31 bit code disappears, you may not be able to keep up with the Jones 
with respect on where you are sending the files.  I don't know how backleveled 
encryption software goes.  You might be limited to 128 bit encryption instead 
of 2k encryption keys.

4.  I have a GPG server which encripts files for our VSE systems.  It runs in 
96 MBs, with vdisk for swapping.  You shouldn't have problems getting that much 
real memory carved out.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

 David L. Craig d...@radix.net 1/13/2009 12:00 PM 
I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
(7060-H30) with 2 GB in basic mode running VM/ESA 2.2 and
hosting VSE/ESA 2.2 in V=R.  We may be required by auditors
to encrypt files for transmission to other hosts.  I'm
saying it's feasible to install a Linux distribution into
a V=V virtual machine and perform the encryption there,
either with gpg or by using openssl.  We're currently
averaging about 20% CPU utilization.  Can anyone see any
holes in this?  Do current distros still support this
platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
current encryption software work on the older distro?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread Adam Thornton

On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mark Post wrote:


On 1/13/2009 at  1:00 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote:

I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000

-snip-

Do current distros still support this
platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
current encryption software work on the older distro?


SLES10 and RHEL5 are 64-bit only.  Previous versions are 31-bit or
64-bit.  The non-commercial distributions, Debian/390, Slack/390,
CentOS are mostly 31-bit.  So far as I know, they all include GPG
and OpenSSL.


Yeah.  How acceptable this will be depends, really, on the bandwidth
you need encrypted, because doing crypto on a multiprise is pretty
slow.  Something that we've had success with (depending on your
requirements) is to use an outboard x86 box, a private network, and
some iptables magic to make it transparent to everything else on the
network but do your crypto where it's cheap.

There are, of course, organizations that will provide support for non-
major distributions, and at least one that really, really likes
Debian.  Ask me offline.

Adam

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I doubt David's auditors will be able to raise a valid objection to
running an out-of-support Linux, when they apparently haven't objected
to running VM/ESA 2.2.

I knew Multiprises were old, but I didn't know that they were old enough
to be museum exhibits.

   Dennis

We are Borg of America.  You will be assimilated.  Resistance is futile.

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:45
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Encryption on a 7060

There are not many holes, but things to consider.  We had a MP3000 H30
also.

1.  It doesn't perform Linux stuff as well as other mainframes.  There
is a CPU instruction added in newer systems, that made Linux performance
much better.  So, don't take poor performance on the MP3000 as an
indication of performance on new boxes.  But if you lave the CPU time
available, it works.

2.  You have to run SLES 7 or SLES8 (in 31 bit mode).  As these are
older distros, they may run out of support.  That may affect how
auditors view the setup.

3.  As 31 bit code disappears, you may not be able to keep up with the
Jones with respect on where you are sending the files.  I don't know how
backleveled encryption software goes.  You might be limited to 128 bit
encryption instead of 2k encryption keys.

4.  I have a GPG server which encripts files for our VSE systems.  It
runs in 96 MBs, with vdisk for swapping.  You shouldn't have problems
getting that much real memory carved out.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

 David L. Craig d...@radix.net 1/13/2009 12:00 PM 
I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
(7060-H30) with 2 GB in basic mode running VM/ESA 2.2 and
hosting VSE/ESA 2.2 in V=R.  We may be required by auditors
to encrypt files for transmission to other hosts.  I'm
saying it's feasible to install a Linux distribution into
a V=V virtual machine and perform the encryption there,
either with gpg or by using openssl.  We're currently
averaging about 20% CPU utilization.  Can anyone see any
holes in this?  Do current distros still support this
platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
current encryption software work on the older distro?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread Gentry, Stephen
To echo some of the others comments:  We ran Linux (Redhat) on our H50
and response time wasn't that great. We could say we were running Linux
on the mainframe (bragging rights) but that was about it. We did this
when the H50 was considered a new box (via the market) At that time, for
us, it was a solution looking for a problem.
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
David L. Craig
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Encryption on a 7060

I curate a museum which includes a uni-CP Multiprise 3000
(7060-H30) with 2 GB in basic mode running VM/ESA 2.2 and
hosting VSE/ESA 2.2 in V=R.  We may be required by auditors
to encrypt files for transmission to other hosts.  I'm
saying it's feasible to install a Linux distribution into
a V=V virtual machine and perform the encryption there,
either with gpg or by using openssl.  We're currently
averaging about 20% CPU utilization.  Can anyone see any
holes in this?  Do current distros still support this
platform or will I need something older, and if so, will
current encryption software work on the older distro?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David L. Craig
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:58:57AM -0800, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:

 I knew Multiprises were old, but I didn't know that they were
 old enough to be museum exhibits.

Oh, it's not the main exhibit at all.  It's our
newest.  The main event is the 9121 we use for DR,
complete with 9345s.  If more than three people
can top that, I'll stop calling myself the curator.

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David Boyes
On 1/13/09 4:20 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:58:57AM -0800, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:

 I knew Multiprises were old, but I didn't know that they were
 old enough to be museum exhibits.

 Oh, it's not the main exhibit at all.  It's our
 newest.  The main event is the 9121 we use for DR,
 complete with 9345s.  If more than three people
 can top that, I'll stop calling myself the curator.

IBM 360/75 with 2311s? 8-)

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David L. Craig
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:23:57PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:

 IBM 360/75 with 2311s? 8-)

Powered up?  Under hardware maintenance (the drives,
not the CPC)?  Has a business purpose?

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David Boyes
On 1/13/09 4:34 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:23:57PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:

 IBM 360/75 with 2311s? 8-)

 Powered up?

Well, only on request. That thing EATS power.

 Under hardware maintenance (the drives,
 not the CPC)?

Well, if you count me as maintenance personnel

 Has a business purpose?

Well, it *used* to launch NASA spacecraft, until 1984 -- it was replaced by
a 3090E. As to now, it's a great teaching tool about 370 architecture.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Encryption on a 7060

2009-01-13 Thread David L. Craig
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:54:16PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:

  On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:23:57PM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
 
  IBM 360/75 with 2311s? 8-)
 
  Powered up?

 Well, only on request. That thing EATS power.

  Under hardware maintenance (the drives,
  not the CPC)?

 Well, if you count me as maintenance personnel

  Has a business purpose?

 Well, it *used* to launch NASA spacecraft, until 1984 -- it was replaced by
 a 3090E. As to now, it's a great teaching tool about 370 architecture.

I'll accept all three, although only one is necessary.  That's one.
Any other takers?

I wonder if it's one of the two 75s Goddard used for orbit
computation?  I was part of the effort that replaced them
in 83 with two NAS (Itel) 8040s.  That's where this whole
curator thing came from.  The Data Center Manager told me
he was conducting his usual tour, in this case a group of
Japanese dignitaries, when one of them asked him, So
you're the curator of this museum?  This museum was what
took over if Houston was hit by a hurricane.  I'm so
glad I wasn't there at the time because I'm sure I would
have totally cracked up.

My first mainframe had two (Marshall) 2311s.  And 16 KB
of core.  But it was a Model 22, not as old as a 75.

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390