Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Dejan, > ocf_run now has option -q to suppress output logging in case the > command ran OK. Thanks!! I test ocf_run in pgsql. Had better patch be able to appoint the practice by the option of ocf_run in an OCF parameter of pgsql-RA, too? (example) Or are not necessary? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:20:03AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Serge, > > Hi Lars, > > Hi Dejan, > > > > Thank you for an opinion. > > > > I think it to be good with an option of ocf_run. > > An option will be useful in future. > > > > To Dejan : About this matter, do we wait for the opinion of > > other people a little more? > > ocf_run now has option -q to suppress output logging in case the > command ran OK. > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > --- Serge Dubrouski wrote: > > > > > I'm in a complete agreement with Lars. Instead of creating new > > > function runasowner_for_monitor() inside an RA, and pgsql probably not > > > the only case of "too much logging", I'd rather introduce a new option > > > for ocf_run. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree > > > wrote: > > > > On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > > > > > >> I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > > >> > > > >> With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > > > > > > > Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the > > > > script - but the lrmd might still catch it. > > > > > > > > In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to > > > > ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > � �Lars > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > > > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg) > > > > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar > > > > Wilde > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Serge Dubrouski. > > > ___ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Hideo-san, On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:20:03AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Serge, > Hi Lars, > Hi Dejan, > > Thank you for an opinion. > > I think it to be good with an option of ocf_run. > An option will be useful in future. > > To Dejan : About this matter, do we wait for the opinion of > other people a little more? ocf_run now has option -q to suppress output logging in case the command ran OK. Cheers, Dejan > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > --- Serge Dubrouski wrote: > > > I'm in a complete agreement with Lars. Instead of creating new > > function runasowner_for_monitor() inside an RA, and pgsql probably not > > the only case of "too much logging", I'd rather introduce a new option > > for ocf_run. > > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > > On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > > > >> I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > >> > > >> With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > > > > > Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the > > > script - but the lrmd might still catch it. > > > > > > In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to > > > ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > � �Lars > > > > > > -- > > > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg) > > > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > > > > > ___ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Serge Dubrouski. > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Serge, Hi Lars, Hi Dejan, Thank you for an opinion. I think it to be good with an option of ocf_run. An option will be useful in future. To Dejan : About this matter, do we wait for the opinion of other people a little more? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Serge Dubrouski wrote: > I'm in a complete agreement with Lars. Instead of creating new > function runasowner_for_monitor() inside an RA, and pgsql probably not > the only case of "too much logging", I'd rather introduce a new option > for ocf_run. > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > >> I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > >> > >> With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > > > Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the > > script - but the lrmd might still catch it. > > > > In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to > > ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. > > > > > > Regards, > > � �Lars > > > > -- > > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg) > > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > -- > Serge Dubrouski. > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
I'm in a complete agreement with Lars. Instead of creating new function runasowner_for_monitor() inside an RA, and pgsql probably not the only case of "too much logging", I'd rather introduce a new option for ocf_run. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >> I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. >> >> With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the > script - but the lrmd might still catch it. > > In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to > ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > -- Serge Dubrouski. ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
On 2010-08-18T14:42:15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. Yes, but the output goes to stdout still, it is just not captured by the script - but the lrmd might still catch it. In my opinion, the best fix would be to introduce a "-q" option to ocf_run, which would prevent the logging for the success case. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Dejan,
SorrryI made a mistake in comment.
> When we do not use logd, all log is output.
> * We use logfacility without using logd.
>
> (snip)
> if
> [ -n "$HA_LOGFACILITY" ]
> then
> : logging through syslog
> # loglevel is unknown, use 'notice' for now
> loglevel=notice
> case "${*}" in
> *ERROR*) loglevel=err;;
> *WARN*) loglevel=warning;;
> *INFO*|info) loglevel=info;;
> esac
> logger -t "$HA_LOGTAG" -p ${HA_LOGFACILITY}.${loglevel} "${*}" --->
> this
> fi
> (snip)
This is comment of another problem.
Please please forget this comment.
The main point of my change is not to use ocf_run by monitor processing.
When distance of monitor is short, the reason is because very useless log is
output.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
> > > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
> >
> > I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
>
> When we do not use logd, all log is output.
> * We use logfacility without using logd.
>
> (snip)
> if
> [ -n "$HA_LOGFACILITY" ]
> then
> : logging through syslog
> # loglevel is unknown, use 'notice' for now
> loglevel=notice
> case "${*}" in
> *ERROR*) loglevel=err;;
> *WARN*) loglevel=warning;;
> *INFO*|info) loglevel=info;;
> esac
> logger -t "$HA_LOGTAG" -p ${HA_LOGFACILITY}.${loglevel} "${*}" --->
> this
> fi
> (snip)
>
> > > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
> >
> > Why is that?
>
> In fact, we always used the script which confirmed survival of logd.
> However, we decided to abolish survival monitor of this logd this time.
> And it was decided that the log went by way of a syslog.
>
> > Let's hope we get some input from others too.
>
> All right.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Hi Dejan,
> > >
> > > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > > >
> > > > What is your opinion?
> > >
> > > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
> >
> > I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
> >
> > > However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd.
> > >
> > > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
> >
> > Why is that?
> >
> > > If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy.
> >
> > Let's hope we get some input from others too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest
> > > > > edition.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a practice result of select now().
> > > > >
> > > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now
> > > > > --
> > > > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09
> > > > > (1 row)
> > > > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now
> > > > > --- 2010-08-17
> > > > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row)
> > > > >
> > > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor.
> > > > >
> > > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet.
> > > >
> > > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > > >
> > > > What is your opinion?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Dejan
> > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > ___
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comment.
> > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
>
> I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
When we do not use logd, all log is output.
* We use logfacility without using logd.
(snip)
if
[ -n "$HA_LOGFACILITY" ]
then
: logging through syslog
# loglevel is unknown, use 'notice' for now
loglevel=notice
case "${*}" in
*ERROR*)loglevel=err;;
*WARN*) loglevel=warning;;
*INFO*|info)loglevel=info;;
esac
logger -t "$HA_LOGTAG" -p ${HA_LOGFACILITY}.${loglevel} "${*}" --->
this
fi
(snip)
> > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
>
> Why is that?
In fact, we always used the script which confirmed survival of logd.
However, we decided to abolish survival monitor of this logd this time.
And it was decided that the log went by way of a syslog.
> Let's hope we get some input from others too.
All right.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > >
> > > What is your opinion?
> >
> > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well.
>
> I don't understand how would logd make a difference?
>
> > However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd.
> >
> > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now.
>
> Why is that?
>
> > If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy.
>
> Let's hope we get some input from others too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> >
> > --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql.
> > > >
> > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest
> > > > edition.
> > > >
> > > > This is a practice result of select now().
> > > >
> > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now
> > > > --
> > > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09
> > > > (1 row)
> > > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now
> > > > --- 2010-08-17
> > > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row)
> > > >
> > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor.
> > > >
> > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet.
> > >
> > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too
> > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"?
> > >
> > > What is your opinion?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dejan
> > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > >
> > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> ___
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > > > What is your opinion? > > When we use logd, ocf_log functions well. I don't understand how would logd make a difference? > However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd. > > We advance to the direction that does not use logd now. Why is that? > If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy. Let's hope we get some input from others too. Cheers, Dejan > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql. > > > > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest edition. > > > > > > This is a practice result of select now(). > > > > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now -- > > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09 > > > (1 row) > > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now > > > --- 2010-08-17 > > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row) > > > > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > > > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > > > What is your opinion? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dejan > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > ___ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi Dejan, > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > What is your opinion? When we use logd, ocf_log functions well. However, we give considerably annoying log when we do not use logd. We advance to the direction that does not use logd now. If a problem is solved by changing it into new ocf_log, I obey the policy. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql. > > > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest edition. > > > > This is a practice result of select now(). > > > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now -- > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09 > > (1 row) > > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now --- > > 2010-08-17 > > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row) > > > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. > > We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too > much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? > > What is your opinion? > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > ___ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]Restraint of the noisy log output of the monitor processing.
Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi, > > I tested the latest edition of pgsql. > > However, log is output at every monitor processing in the latest edition. > > This is a practice result of select now(). > > Aug 17 15:03:35 n1 pgsql[16269]: INFO: now -- > 2010-08-17-15:03:35.28827+09 > (1 row) > Aug 17 15:03:45 n1 pgsql[16516]: INFO: now --- > 2010-08-17 > 15:03:45.528977+09 (1 row) > > I send the patch which I changed it of to form same as former monitor. > > With this patch, the log of the monitor processing becomes quiet. We need a different kind of ocf_run, the existing one makes too much noise. Or to fix it. Anybody against dropping "ocf_log info"? What is your opinion? Thanks, Dejan > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > ___ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ ___ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
