Re: Qtext

2002-09-27 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

Hi,

I talked with Itzhak Mintz yesterday. He told me several things:

1. The only windows specific bit in Qtext is that certain classes
   inherit from a class for a generic window (something called hwindow).
   Everything else (including buttons, menus, fonts ...) is their own. I
   guess this should make the porting effort minimal.

2. He would like to be in contact with someone who is willing to take
   responsibility for the porting project. If there is someone who is
   willing to do this, please email me.

3. The algorithms are not patented. Furthermore, he claims that the same
   ideas that they use in QText can be applied in general to solve most
   of the bidi problems (in essence, the idea is that the standards
   should be changed so that all non-word characters will have a r2l 
   version, so there will be a r2l '-', a r2l ' ' and so on). He said
   that if someone is interested in addopting it for the system level
   (whatever it means... I gather that bidi support is dealt with in
   QT, but I have no idea what happens with applications that are not QT
   based), he is willing to help. If someone is interested in this,
   please email me.

He also showed me their last version for windows, and it *is* much
better than whatever I saw so far (actually, it seems better than M$
word even without the bidi issues).

Moshe

PS: I'm going to miluim this Monday for a month, so if you want to
contact him through me, send me an email before that.

  Moshe Kaminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24/09/02 11:27]:
 Hi,
 When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
 machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
 (by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.
 
 Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
 same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
 freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
 support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
 developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
 (apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
 software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
 source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
 high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
 bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).
 
 My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 
 Moshe
 
 --
 Moshe Kaminsky 
 (Home) 08-9471073
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-27 Thread Shay Elkin

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:17:41 +0300, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 I talked with Itzhak Mintz yesterday. He told me several things:
 
 2. He would like to be in contact with someone who is willing to take
responsibility for the porting project. If there is someone who is
willing to do this, please email me.

As I have some exprience with both BiDi and Object-Pascal/Delphi, and
think QText 5.5 was the best word-processor, ever, I'd be happy to
volunteer for this job.

Shay.





=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-27 Thread Uri Bruck

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

   Matitiahu Allouche [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27/09/02 13:29]:
  The main problem in a Bidi word processor is not how to transform logical 
  to visual format.  As Tzafrir Cohen mentioned, there are a number of 
  libraries available for this purpose, which all generally produce the same 
  results, the exceptions being for rather off-beat cases.
  
  The main problem is with the *interface*, mainly what should Delete, 
  Backspace etc... perform, where the caret (or text cursor) should go after 
  given operations, how to handle selection, to name a few important issues.
  
 Well, if you have the additional information that your character is a
 r2l character (even if it is a space or parentheses), this can help you
 decide what to do. I actually saw how both Backspace and selection work
 in QText, and it seems to work great.

Neither of them made sense to me. Furthermore, Qtext conforms to the 
Win3.1 language switching convention, right-alt-shift always switches to Hebrew 
while left-alt-shift always switches to English, while Win9x uses both 
alt-shift simply as switch language, which means that the language shown 
on the toolbar is not necessarily the language Qtext writes in.

-- 
Thanks,
Uri
http://translation.israel.net


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-27 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

  Uri Bruck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27/09/02 23:11]:
 On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
Matitiahu Allouche [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27/09/02 13:29]:
   The main problem in a Bidi word processor is not how to transform logical 
   to visual format.  As Tzafrir Cohen mentioned, there are a number of 
   libraries available for this purpose, which all generally produce the same 
   results, the exceptions being for rather off-beat cases.
   
   The main problem is with the *interface*, mainly what should Delete, 
   Backspace etc... perform, where the caret (or text cursor) should go after 
   given operations, how to handle selection, to name a few important issues.
   
  Well, if you have the additional information that your character is a
  r2l character (even if it is a space or parentheses), this can help you
  decide what to do. I actually saw how both Backspace and selection work
  in QText, and it seems to work great.
 
 Neither of them made sense to me. Furthermore, Qtext conforms to the 
 Win3.1 language switching convention, right-alt-shift always switches to Hebrew 
 while left-alt-shift always switches to English, while Win9x uses both 
 alt-shift simply as switch language, which means that the language shown 
 on the toolbar is not necessarily the language Qtext writes in.

QText does not use windows to handle bidi, but handles it internally.
That's what makes it work. I think that being non windows compatible is
a small price to pay for a working bidi support.
 -- 
 Thanks,
 Uri
 http://translation.israel.net
Moshe

 
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 Guy Baruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25/09/02 12:27]:
 
  There's something in this thread I may be a bit too simple to understand.
 
  I assume bidi support is really better than in current products, are the
  algorithms
  patented?
 This question never occured to me, and he didn't mention anything about
 it. I think that when he released the first versions, people were not
 patenting algorithms, and I don't think he ever published the algorithm,
 so my guess is that they are not patented. I'll ask him. Anyway, he
 claims (and I believe him) that bidi support in Qtext is significantly
 better than in M$ word.

Word8 (that is: Word97), you mean.

 
  if so, I'm not really sure what good will releasing _the source_ to public
  domain will do, at least for law-abiding entities ( {persons} \subset
  {entities} ... :) ).
 
  If , OTOH, there are no patents, than wouldn't releasing the source be
  beneficial to other projects regardless of the porting effort ?

 Yes, assuming the people who work there are willing to read the source,
 extract the algorithms and apply them to those projects (which, I guess,
 might be quite a lot of work). If they *are* willing to do this, perhaps
 getting the algorithms will be easier than getting the source.

libbidiqtext may be nice, but...

Currently fribidi, IBM's ICU and QT3 both implement basically the same
algorithm for converting logical-visual text. (as defined in the unicode
standard). This standard does not define how an interactive application
that edits text should behave, and leaves a number of problematic issues,
but I tend to suspect that qtext's algorithms deviate from it.

Qtext itself is the immediate destination. The ability to read and do
something useful with qtext files would also be nice.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-25 Thread Oded Arbel

Uri Bruck wrote:

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

  

I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.



As far as I can recall, Delphi was very similar in concept to visual C++ 
except that it was based on Pascal instead of C. Sort of MFC-like

Not. unlike Visual C++, Delphi was really visual programming. you can 
compare it to Visual Basic (the product which it was developed to 
fight), except that VB suck and Delphi doesn't. the Borland Visual C++ 
killer is C++ Builder.

Does the Windows version have its own Hebrew support or does it use 
Windows Hebrew support?

QText uses direct GDI calls for everything - it even draws its own 
fonts. that way you can have hebrew (and other languages- the last 
version I worked with supported over 30 languages) even on english only 
windows. I think that porting that would be easier, as the number of API 
calls used will be relativly small.

-- 
Oded 

::..
There's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view that I hold dear.
-- Daniel Dennett



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-25 Thread Guy Baruch


There's something in this thread I may be a bit too simple to understand.

I assume bidi support is really better than in current products, are the 
algorithms
patented ?

if so, I'm not really sure what good will releasing _the source_ to public
domain will do, at least for law-abiding entities ( {persons} \subset 
{entities} ... :) ).

If , OTOH, there are no patents, than wouldn't releasing the source be
beneficial to other projects regardless of the porting effort ?

To summarize, it seems to me the porting effort, requires that
the source be released, but IMHO its' feasibility should not hinder efforts
to release the source.

I, for one, am willing to donate a modest amount (~100 shekels) for the 
explicit
purpose of releasing the source (unburdened by patents) to public domain.

Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

Hi,
When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
(by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.

Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
(apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).

My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?

Moshe

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  


-- 
-- regards

+---
+ Guy Baruch , Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institue.
+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ phone: 972-8-934-2211
+---

They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.

--English folk poem, circa 1764




=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-25 Thread Nadav Har'El

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Guy Baruch wrote about Re: Qtext:
 +---
 + Guy Baruch , Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institue.
 + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 + phone: 972-8-934-2211
 +---
 
 They hang the man and flog the woman
 That steal the goose from off the common,
 But let the greater villain loose
 That steals the common from the goose.
 
 --English folk poem, circa 1764

Interesting sig.

People who don't know what this means might benefit from reading David
Bollier's Reclaiming the Commons, at
http://bostonreview.mit.edu/BR27.3/bollier.html

-- 
Nadav Har'El|   Wednesday, Sep 25 2002, 19 Tishri 5763
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |It is better to be thought a fool, then
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-25 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

  Guy Baruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25/09/02 12:27]:
 
 There's something in this thread I may be a bit too simple to understand.
 
 I assume bidi support is really better than in current products, are the 
 algorithms
 patented ?
This question never occured to me, and he didn't mention anything about
it. I think that when he released the first versions, people were not
patenting algorithms, and I don't think he ever published the algorithm,
so my guess is that they are not patented. I'll ask him. Anyway, he
claims (and I believe him) that bidi support in Qtext is significantly
better than in M$ word.
 
 if so, I'm not really sure what good will releasing _the source_ to public
 domain will do, at least for law-abiding entities ( {persons} \subset 
 {entities} ... :) ).
 
 If , OTOH, there are no patents, than wouldn't releasing the source be
 beneficial to other projects regardless of the porting effort ?
Yes, assuming the people who work there are willing to read the source,
extract the algorithms and apply them to those projects (which, I guess,
might be quite a lot of work). If they *are* willing to do this, perhaps
getting the algorithms will be easier than getting the source.
 
 To summarize, it seems to me the porting effort, requires that
 the source be released, but IMHO its' feasibility should not hinder efforts
 to release the source.
 
 I, for one, am willing to donate a modest amount (~100 shekels) for the 
 explicit
 purpose of releasing the source (unburdened by patents) to public domain.
 
 Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
 Hi,
 When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
 machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
 (by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.
 
 Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
 same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
 freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
 support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
 developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
 (apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
 software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
 source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
 high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
 bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).
 
 My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 
 Moshe
 
 --
 Moshe Kaminsky 
 (Home) 08-9471073
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  
 
 
 -- 
 -- regards
 
 +---
 + Guy Baruch , Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institue.
 + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 + phone: 972-8-934-2211
 +---
 
 They hang the man and flog the woman
 That steal the goose from off the common,
 But let the greater villain loose
 That steals the common from the goose.
 
 --English folk poem, circa 1764
 
 
 
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-25 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt

Guy Baruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I assume bidi support is really better than in current products, are
 the algorithms patented ?

I presume that Qtext dates back to the blissful old days when
algorithms could not be patented...

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
=
... Of theoretical physics and programming, programming embodied 
the greater intellectual challenge. [E.W.Dijkstra, 1930 - 2002.]

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

Hi,
When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
(by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.

Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
(apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).

My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?

Moshe

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef

On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
 My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?

Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)

Gilad.
-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://benyossef.com

Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
 Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham

Hi Moshe,
The source code was probably not written in a way that can be ported - 
e.g. the display aspect is probably not isolated by a portability layer 
but probably uses direct calles to MFC, OWL or some other proprietary 
widget library that does not lend itself to portability. This would make 
the source code worthless.
Regards,

 - yba


On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 Hi,
 When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
 machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
 (by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.
 
 Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
 same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
 freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
 support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
 developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
 (apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
 software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
 source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
 high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
 bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).
 
 My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 
 Moshe
 
 --
 Moshe Kaminsky 
 (Home) 08-9471073
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-- 
 EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Dvir Volk

do you think trhat porting QText to Linux is really feasible and worth the effort?

i agree that the bidi support there was excellent, and i used to work with qtext for 
years, but qt's bidi support has become pretty mature, and i'm not sure if it's worth 
the effort of porting MFC or whatever windows code to linux, or if that won't mean 
rewriting the whole thing from scratch, practically.

btw, the name, at least, is already linux-ready: it QText sounds perfect for a QT app 
:)

Dvir Volk
Editor in Chief
Nana by NetVision 
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Tel: 03-5652585 |  Fax:03-6241952 | 
http://www.netvision.net.il  http://www.nana.co.il
NetVision LTD. Omega Center, Matam Haifa 31905
 


 -Original Message-
 From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:36 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Qtext
 
 
 On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
  
  My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 
 Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we 
 can have a
 'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
 
 Gilad.
 -- 
 Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://benyossef.com
 
 Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
  Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.
 
 
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

Hi,

At least up till some stage, this was a dos thing, so probably at least
*that* can be ported. Even the latest version is a 16-bit application
(though it does run on the newer windows versions) - I don't know
exactly what this means, but I guess this might mean that the windows
specific components are quite mild. The guy who wrote this has never
worked on linux (or unix), but I'll ask him what he thinks.

I'm sure that there will be some work in porting it, but I think this
can be done, and I think it's a lesser problem than getting the sources.

* Jonathan Ben Avraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:38]:
 Hi Moshe,
 The source code was probably not written in a way that can be ported - 
 e.g. the display aspect is probably not isolated by a portability layer 
 but probably uses direct calles to MFC, OWL or some other proprietary 
 widget library that does not lend itself to portability. This would make 
 the source code worthless.
 Regards,
 
  - yba
 
 
 On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
  Hi,
  When I was a kid, I used a word processor called Qtext on my dos
  machine. It was a freeware written by an Israeli guy, and had a better
  (by far) bidi support than any alternative I knew.
  
  Yesterday, I discovered that I work with the guy who wrote it in the
  same room. He told me that Qtext still exists, it is no longer a
  freeware (it belongs to his kibutz) and that it still has the best bidi
  support (they have only a window$ version). He also told me that the
  developement of Qtext has stopped, since people seem to prefer M$ word
  (apparently for the same obscure reasons they prefer other M$ 
  software :). Anyway, he told me that they might be willing to sell the
  source. Since they ceased developing it, I guess the price won't be very
  high, and if it is possible to port it to linux, this might be the best
  bidi word processor we have (it also supports Arabic and nikud).
  
  My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
  
  Moshe
  
  --
  Moshe Kaminsky 
  (Home) 08-9471073
  
  =
  To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
  echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 -- 
  EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA~. .~   Tk Open Systems
 =}ooO--U--Ooo{=
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
 
 
 

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

* Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
 On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
  
  My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 
 Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
 'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)

Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).

Moshe

 
 Gilad.
 -- 
 Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://benyossef.com
 
 Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
  Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.
 
 
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

Hi,

About feasible, I don't really know, since I didn't see the code. I will
ask (maybe someone else in the development team there _is_ familiar with
linux).

As for worth the effort, I find hebrew support in the existing
processors quite unsatisfactory. In fact, last time I checked (KDE 3.0.2
and koffice about two months ago, and openoffice with some hebrew
patch), it was even worse than M$ word, which is a nightmare by itself.
Perhaps I missed something or maybe things have drastically improved
since then, but otherwise I believe QText would be a big improvement. I
agree it isn't worth rewriting the whole thing, but maybe it can be
ported with some minor changes.

Moshe

PS is it just me, or does everyone get all the recent mails twice?

* Dvir Volk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:56]:
 do you think trhat porting QText to Linux is really feasible and worth the effort?
 
 i agree that the bidi support there was excellent, and i used to work with qtext for 
years, but qt's bidi support has become pretty mature, and i'm not sure if it's worth 
the effort of porting MFC or whatever windows code to linux, or if that won't mean 
rewriting the whole thing from scratch, practically.
 
 btw, the name, at least, is already linux-ready: it QText sounds perfect for a QT 
app :)
 
 Dvir Volk
 Editor in Chief
 Nana by NetVision 
 _
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Tel: 03-5652585 |  Fax:03-6241952 | 
http://www.netvision.net.il  http://www.nana.co.il
 NetVision LTD. Omega Center, Matam Haifa 31905
  
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:36 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Qtext
  
  
  On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
   
   My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
  
  Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we 
  can have a
  'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
  
  Gilad.
  -- 
  Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://benyossef.com
  
  Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
   Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.
  
  
  
  =
  To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
  echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 * Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
  On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
   
   My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
  
  Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
  'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
 
 Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
 matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
 might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).
 
 Moshe

You better do a code review with someone who understands porting issues 
before you even think about prices.

 - yba


 
  
  Gilad.
  -- 
  Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://benyossef.com
  
  Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
   Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.
  
  
  
  =
  To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
  echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 --
 Moshe Kaminsky 
 (Home) 08-9471073
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-- 
 EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Shachar Shemesh

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
If you like, and if you think this is ok, I think I can reresent both 
the body who may eventually shell out the money, and understand how much 
it is WORTH for the community.

Before we start, however, is there anyone here who will vulenteer to do 
the actual porting work? If noone steps forward right now, there is no 
point in shelling out the money.

~Shachar


Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

|* Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
|
|On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
|
|My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
|
|Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
|'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
|
|
|Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
|matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
|might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).
|
|Moshe
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQE9kC7Zg8ByFc29vOIRAuA1AJ4/ZK+yawbORgC8E07P66JYY1i+9wCgmAiS
dqoxLmr+IT/UijDz+wGQ0NQ=
=gi+F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
  
 If you like, and if you think this is ok, I think I can reresent both 
 the body who may eventually shell out the money, and understand how much 
 it is WORTH for the community.
 
 Before we start, however, is there anyone here who will vulenteer to do 
 the actual porting work? If noone steps forward right now, there is no 
 point in shelling out the money.
 
 ~Shachar

That might depend on how much work the porting would take. Easier to get 
volunteers for an easy port, hard to get volunteers for a messy port.

 - yba


 
 
 Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
 |* Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
 |
 |On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 |
 |My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 |
 |Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
 |'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
 |
 |
 |Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
 |matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
 |might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).
 |
 |Moshe
 |
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
  
 iD8DBQE9kC7Zg8ByFc29vOIRAuA1AJ4/ZK+yawbORgC8E07P66JYY1i+9wCgmAiS
 dqoxLmr+IT/UijDz+wGQ0NQ=
 =gi+F
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-- 
 EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:59:15AM +0300, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 * Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
  On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
   
   My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
  
  Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
  'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
 
 Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
 matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
 might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).

Does anyone still buy it? Does the Kibbutz still makes money of it?
If not, isn't there a chance they will agree to give it away?
The latest version seems to be from 1998. I believe they sold very
few licenses since, say, 2000. People rarely buy 4 years old software,
even without getting addicted to microsoft.

About portability: The demo (you can (could?) download from www.qtext.com)
works quite well with recent versions of wine. This might (or might not,
I am not an expert) mean porting to libwine might be much easier, even
though less portable (e.g. to other Unices), than to QT.
I personally think that an existing program, that took, I guess, tens
of man-years to develop, and will take maybe a few man-months to port,
is worth having. I do not think anyone should start _now_ a new project,
given openoffice, koffice and abiword already exist. But QText already
exists, and I know some people that really liked some features of it
(not me personally - I almost never use any wordprocessor, and prefer
lyx when I have to).

Another thing it might be useful for is people that still have qtext
files. I know (from experience) that some files are very hard to
move to word (or text, html, anything), especially using a lot of
nikud.

Last thing: a google search for HTML Page - Created by QText (with
the quotes) has 3320 results. This means it was still used recently
(also after the export to html feature was added).

 
 Moshe
 
  
  Gilad.
  -- 
  Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://benyossef.com
  
  Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
   Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.
  
  
  
  =
  To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
  echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 --
 Moshe Kaminsky 
 (Home) 08-9471073
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Moshe Kaminsky

Hi,

Of course, this is an important question. I just thought that the first
question is whether we have any chance of getting the source. Since you
say that someone might possibly fund it, I'll try to dig some more
details from the guy when I meet him (on Thursday), both about the price
and the feasibility of porting.

I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.

For myself, I can say that if porting will turn out to be feasible, I'll
be willing to take some part in it. My involvment will be limited,
however, by the fact that I have no knowledge of any of the involved
issues (I have some vague recollection of Pascal - another thing I did
as a kid :), and also since the time I can spend on it is limited.

Moshe

PS You are most welcome to forward this to whoever you think appropriate.

* Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 12:19]:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 If you like, and if you think this is ok, I think I can reresent both 
 the body who may eventually shell out the money, and understand how much 
 it is WORTH for the community.
 
 Before we start, however, is there anyone here who will vulenteer to do 
 the actual porting work? If noone steps forward right now, there is no 
 point in shelling out the money.
 
 ~Shachar
 
 
 Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
 |* Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
 |
 |On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 |
 |My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
 |
 |Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have a
 |'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
 |
 |
 |Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's a
 |matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
 |might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).
 |
 |Moshe
 |
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iD8DBQE9kC7Zg8ByFc29vOIRAuA1AJ4/ZK+yawbORgC8E07P66JYY1i+9wCgmAiS
 dqoxLmr+IT/UijDz+wGQ0NQ=
 =gi+F
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 

-- 
Linux, cause i reboot less often than windows users reinstall...

--
Moshe Kaminsky 
(Home) 08-9471073

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Dan Kenigsberg

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:50:07PM +0300, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
 I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
 written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.

In this case I guess porting is quite a big project.
Unless you use Borland's lovely Kylix (Delphi's spin into Linux), which probably
will speed things ai lot.
However - this tool is *not free*. 

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Uri Bruck

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Of course, this is an important question. I just thought that the first
 question is whether we have any chance of getting the source. Since you
 say that someone might possibly fund it, I'll try to dig some more
 details from the guy when I meet him (on Thursday), both about the price
 and the feasibility of porting.
 
 I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
 written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.

As far as I can recall, Delphi was very similar in concept to visual C++ 
except that it was based on Pascal instead of C. Sort of MFC-like

Does the Windows version have its own Hebrew support or does it use 
Windows Hebrew support?

 
 For myself, I can say that if porting will turn out to be feasible, I'll
 be willing to take some part in it. My involvment will be limited,
 however, by the fact that I have no knowledge of any of the involved
 issues (I have some vague recollection of Pascal - another thing I did
 as a kid :), and also since the time I can spend on it is limited.
 
 Moshe
 
 PS You are most welcome to forward this to whoever you think appropriate.

-- 
Thanks,
Uri
http://translation.israel.net


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Oleg

OK, if you say that this thing is Delphi like I suspected, then I'll do the
porting to Kylix.

Bring it on :)

Oleg.

- Original Message -
From: Moshe Kaminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Qtext


 Hi,

 Of course, this is an important question. I just thought that the first
 question is whether we have any chance of getting the source. Since you
 say that someone might possibly fund it, I'll try to dig some more
 details from the guy when I meet him (on Thursday), both about the price
 and the feasibility of porting.

 I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
 written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.

 For myself, I can say that if porting will turn out to be feasible, I'll
 be willing to take some part in it. My involvment will be limited,
 however, by the fact that I have no knowledge of any of the involved
 issues (I have some vague recollection of Pascal - another thing I did
 as a kid :), and also since the time I can spend on it is limited.

 Moshe

 PS You are most welcome to forward this to whoever you think appropriate.

 * Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 12:19]:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  If you like, and if you think this is ok, I think I can reresent both
  the body who may eventually shell out the money, and understand how much
  it is WORTH for the community.
 
  Before we start, however, is there anyone here who will vulenteer to do
  the actual porting work? If noone steps forward right now, there is no
  point in shelling out the money.
 
  ~Shachar
 
 
  Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
 
  |* Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 11:40]:
  |
  |On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 11:19, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:
  |
  |My question is, is there someone who might want to fund it?
  |
  |Get us a number and we'll see how reasonable it is. Maybe we can have
a
  |'Free Qtext!' funraiser or something... :-)
  |
  |
  |Well, when I asked him, he said `we can talk'. Basically, I think it's
a
  |matter of negotiation, and to negotiate we need someone who at least
  |might *possibly* buy the sources (definitely not me...).
  |
  |Moshe
  |
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
  iD8DBQE9kC7Zg8ByFc29vOIRAuA1AJ4/ZK+yawbORgC8E07P66JYY1i+9wCgmAiS
  dqoxLmr+IT/UijDz+wGQ0NQ=
  =gi+F
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 

 --
 Linux, cause i reboot less often than windows users reinstall...

 --
 Moshe Kaminsky
 (Home) 08-9471073

 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Oleg

Kylix Open Edition is free.

Check Borland site.

Oleg.

- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: Qtext


 On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:50:07PM +0300, Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

  I guess a relevant bit of information here is that this program is
  written in Delphi, which is some variant of Pascal.

 In this case I guess porting is quite a big project.
 Unless you use Borland's lovely Kylix (Delphi's spin into Linux), which
probably
 will speed things ai lot.
 However - this tool is *not free*.

 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Oleg

 Does the Windows version have its own Hebrew support or does it use
 Windows Hebrew support?

Delphi starting from 5 has it's own bidi algorithms. It does rely on Windows
hebrew but with a little tweaking it can do without.

Oleg.


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread David Tabachnikov

Moshe Kaminsky wrote:

Hi,

At least up till some stage, this was a dos thing, so probably at least
*that* can be ported. Even the latest version is a 16-bit application
(though it does run on the newer windows versions) - I don't know
exactly what this means, but I guess this might mean that the windows
specific components are quite mild. The guy who wrote this has never
worked on linux (or unix), but I'll ask him what he thinks.

I'm sure that there will be some work in porting it, but I think this
can be done, and I think it's a lesser problem than getting the sources.
  

As far as I can remember, QText for dos was written in Pascal, and the 
Windows version was written with Delphi. This should make it rather easy 
to port by using Kylix, since I don't think they used too many non-Kylix 
wrapped API calls in there, and even if they did use a few, it shouldn't 
be a problem to rewrite a few APIs.



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Shachar Shemesh



Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:

About portability: The demo (you can (could?) download from www.qtext.com)
works quite well with recent versions of wine. This might (or might not,
I am not an expert) mean porting to libwine might be much easier, even
though less portable (e.g. to other Unices), than to QT.

If this thing is Delphy, libwine is out of the question unless you can 
recompile Delphy itself.

As for it working with Wine - does the BiDi also work? If so, it more or 
less automatically means that there is no reliance on Windows BiDi.

Shachar



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef

On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 14:08, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
 As for it working with Wine - does the BiDi also work? If so, it more or 
 less automatically means that there is no reliance on Windows BiDi.

Qtext does not rely on Widnosw idi support - Qtext works in Hebrew even
on non Bidi versions of Windows 95.

Gilad.
-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://benyossef.com

Too many journalists think that C4I really stands for Inteligence,
 Communication, Control, Computers and Consiparcy.



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Oleg wrote:

  Does the Windows version have its own Hebrew support or does it use
  Windows Hebrew support?

 Delphi starting from 5 has it's own bidi algorithms. It does rely on Windows
 hebrew but with a little tweaking it can do without.

QText uses its own bidi implementation. It should work also on non-bidi
windows (wine...). Bidi support in delphi/kylix may be something to work
around.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:


 About portability: The demo (you can (could?) download from www.qtext.com)
 works quite well with recent versions of wine.

Not here. qtext has problems with fonts. I kept getting error messages
about problems accessing (or opening, I'm not sure) font files, and I
could not see any Hebrew in the document (IIRC I could also not get any
Hebrew in the menus)

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:08:08PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
 
 
 Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
 
 About portability: The demo (you can (could?) download from www.qtext.com)
 works quite well with recent versions of wine. This might (or might not,
 I am not an expert) mean porting to libwine might be much easier, even
 though less portable (e.g. to other Unices), than to QT.
 
 If this thing is Delphy, libwine is out of the question unless you can 
 recompile Delphy itself.
 
 As for it working with Wine - does the BiDi also work? If so, it more or 
 less automatically means that there is no reliance on Windows BiDi.

I think it works. It does have some problems (I think it has problems with
shift or something), but places hebrew and english correctly inside each
other. This is only a trivial test, with wine version 20011226 (the one
I have installed).

I also think it was deliberate, not using windows bidi, to make it work
on foreign versions of windows.

 
 Shachar
 

Didi


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Qtext

2002-09-24 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:40:01PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
 
 
  About portability: The demo (you can (could?) download from www.qtext.com)
  works quite well with recent versions of wine.
 
 Not here. qtext has problems with fonts. I kept getting error messages
 about problems accessing (or opening, I'm not sure) font files, and I
 could not see any Hebrew in the document (IIRC I could also not get any
 Hebrew in the menus)

On which wine version? It used to be so for years, and I still get tons
of messages about fonts, but see this
http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~didi/qtext-wine-01.jpg

This is with wine 20011226. All older versions that I tried (every few
months) didn't show hebrew unless I invested *a lot* of effort, I didn't
try newer ones.
I will now try, and post if it doesn't work.

 
 -- 
 Tzafrir Cohen
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
 

Didi


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]