Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
WHOA Gents! Let me get some popcorn to watch this p-contest. The way you guys are sniping at each other sounds like the good-old days, when everyone railed me and the subsystem and ended up railing back Guess nothing was learned from the 6+ years of flamage. I have mellowed out with age ... Bart, give Alan a break ... his is genrally right at the end of the day. Alan, give Bart a break ... cause there is no way I am coming back for a three-pete. Cheers, Andre On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they > never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately. > > Bartlomiej > > On 8/14/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd > > > > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted) > > > > > > They were. > > > > I remember discussion about end-of-media ide-cd fixes but the patch > > was never submitted. If you have *URL* to the patch I'll work on the patch. > > > > > > * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" > > > > > > I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with > > > Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is > > > still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around > > > timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug > > > with the base kernel as an example. > > > > Huh? *WHICH* my patch causes this? > > > > I don't remember this discussion et all, care to give some pointers? > > > > > > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will > > > > > take a > > > > > > > > WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), > > > > > > > > This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI > > > > drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. > > > > > > Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in > > > that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...) > > > > Quite likely, WIN_RESTORE is not sent on resume etc. > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they > never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately. Please learn to use the linux-kernel archive. It's quite user friendly - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately. Bartlomiej On 8/14/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd > > > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted) > > > > They were. > > I remember discussion about end-of-media ide-cd fixes but the patch > was never submitted. If you have *URL* to the patch I'll work on the patch. > > > > * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" > > > > I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with > > Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is > > still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around > > timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug > > with the base kernel as an example. > > Huh? *WHICH* my patch causes this? > > I don't remember this discussion et all, care to give some pointers? > > > > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a > > > > > > WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), > > > > > > This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI > > > drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. > > > > Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in > > that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...) > > Quite likely, WIN_RESTORE is not sent on resume etc. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On 8/22/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they > > never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately. > > Please learn to use the linux-kernel archive. It's quite user friendly I did this before sending original mail. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, > > > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG > > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It > should be harmless. Just remembered that I was seeing the above with 11ac7 aswell. -- "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the greatest tribute." - High Court Judge Michael Kirby - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ? Here it is for the two drives. Please note that multisect was turned on manually as well as the security freeze. /dev/hda: ATA device, with non-removable media Model Number: ST3200822A Serial Number: 3LJ22Y8F Firmware Revision: 3.01 Standards: Used: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2 Supported: 6 5 4 3 Configuration: Logical max current cylinders 16383 65535 heads 16 1 sectors/track 63 63 -- CHS current addressable sectors:4128705 LBAuser addressable sectors: 268435455 LBA48 user addressable sectors: 390721968 device size with M = 1024*1024: 190782 MBytes device size with M = 1000*1000: 200049 MBytes (200 GB) Capabilities: LBA, IORDY(can be disabled) bytes avail on r/w long: 4 Queue depth: 1 Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16 Recommended acoustic management value: 128, current value: 0 DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 Cycle time: no flow control=240ns IORDY flow control=120ns Commands/features: Enabled Supported: *READ BUFFER cmd *WRITE BUFFER cmd *Host Protected Area feature set *Look-ahead *Write cache *Power Management feature set Security Mode feature set *FLUSH CACHE EXT command *Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command *48-bit Address feature set SET MAX security extension Security: supported not enabled not locked frozen not expired: security count not supported: enhanced erase HW reset results: CBLID- above Vih Device num = 0 determined by CSEL Checksum: correct /dev/hdc: ATA device, with non-removable media powers-up in standby; SET FEATURES subcmd spins-up. Model Number: IC35L060AVV207-0 Serial Number: VNVB01G2RAK8XH Firmware Revision: V22OA63A Standards: Used: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a Supported: 6 5 4 3 Configuration: Logical max current cylinders 16383 16383 heads 16 16 sectors/track 63 63 -- CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064 LBAuser addressable sectors: 120103200 LBA48 user addressable sectors: 120103200 device size with M = 1024*1024: 58644 MBytes device size with M = 1000*1000: 61492 MBytes (61 GB) Capabilities: LBA, IORDY(can be disabled) bytes avail on r/w long: 52 Queue depth: 32 Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16 Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x) Recommended acoustic management value: 128, current value: 254 DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 Cycle time: no flow control=240ns IORDY flow control=120ns Commands/features: Enabled Supported: *NOP cmd *READ BUFFER cmd *WRITE BUFFER cmd *Host Protected Area feature set Release interrupt *Look-ahead *Write cache *Power Management feature set Security Mode feature set *FLUSH CACHE EXT command *Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command *48-bit Address feature set Automatic Acoustic Management feature set SET MAX security extension Address Offset Reserved Area Boot SET FEATURES subcommand required to spinup after power up Power-Up In Standby feature set Advanced Power Management feature set *General Purpose Logging feature set Security: Master password revision code = 65534 supported not enabled not locked frozen not expired: security count not supported: enhanced erase 30min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT. HW reset results: CBLID- above Vih Device num = 0 determined by the jumper Checksum: correct -- "To the extent that we overreact, we proffe
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd > > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted) > > They were. I remember discussion about end-of-media ide-cd fixes but the patch was never submitted. If you have *URL* to the patch I'll work on the patch. > > * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" > > I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with > Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is > still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around > timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug > with the base kernel as an example. Huh? *WHICH* my patch causes this? I don't remember this discussion et all, care to give some pointers? > > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a > > > > WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), > > > > This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI > > drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. > > Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in > that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...) Quite likely, WIN_RESTORE is not sent on resume etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
Daniel Drake wrote: CaT wrote: 1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7. 2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset. It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any reason (that I spotted) in 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date patches here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/2315_ide-no-lba.patch http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/4345_it8212.patch Daniel Hi All! So far I'm having good luck with Alans patch, 2.6.11ac7. I have all the ports used and it boots and writes Cd's too. Thanks Alan, James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted) They were. > * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug with the base kernel as an example. > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a > > WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), > > This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI > drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> > > should be harmless.
> >
> > Therefore please submit them.
>
> Cut the crap, you know I've submitted the stuff again and again and
> again along with other fixes, reports of stuff you broke you ignored
> etc. So I got bored of playing your games.
* your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
* you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke"
Can't you get over this bullshit please? Life goes on.
> > > > > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
> > > > > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > > > > SeekComplete Error }
> > > > > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
> > > > > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> > >
> > > Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the
> > > IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none
> > > of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop
> > > it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy
> > > and wants stomping.
> >
> > small hint: WIN_RESTORE
>
> Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a
WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was),
This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI
drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE.
> look tomorrow however.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> > should be harmless.
>
> Therefore please submit them.
Cut the crap, you know I've submitted the stuff again and again and
again along with other fixes, reports of stuff you broke you ignored
etc. So I got bored of playing your games.
>
> > > > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
> > > > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > > > SeekComplete Error }
> > > > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
> > > > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> >
> > Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the
> > IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none
> > of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop
> > it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy
> > and wants stomping.
>
> small hint: WIN_RESTORE
Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a
look tomorrow however.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
>
> Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> should be harmless.
Therefore please submit them.
> > > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
> > > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
> > > SeekComplete Error }
> > > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
> > > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
>
> Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the
> IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none
> of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop
> it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy
> and wants stomping.
small hint: WIN_RESTORE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be harmless.
> > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
> > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
> > Error }
> > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
> > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the
IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none
of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop
it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy
and wants stomping.
What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date
Wooo!
patches here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/2315_ide-no-lba.patch
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/4345_it8212.patch
Didn't use these patches. Just went to 13-rc6 for now to test. All works
as before with the following errors on bootup:
Alan Cox might be interested in these, adding to CC.
[227523.229512] hda: max request size: 128KiB
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
[227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
[227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
Error }
[227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
[227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[227524.379085] hda1
[227524.379710] hdc: max request size: 128KiB
[227524.379752] hdc: 120103200 sectors (61492 MB) w/1821KiB Cache,
CHS=16383/255/63, BUG
[227524.379825] hdc: cache flushes not supported
[227524.379991] hdc:hdc: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
Error }
[227524.380702] hdc: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
[227524.380748] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[227525.536757] hdc1 hdc2
/dev/hda:
Model=ST3200822A, FwRev=3.01, SerialNo=3LJ22Y8F
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=65535/1/63, CurSects=4128705, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
AdvancedPM=no
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2:
* signifies the current active mode
/dev/hdc:
Model=IC35L060AVV207-0, FwRev=V22OA63A, SerialNo=VNVB01G2RAK8XH
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=52
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1821kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=120103200
IORDY=on/off
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
AdvancedPM=no
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a:
* signifies the current active mode
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:08:42PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> CaT wrote:
> >1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
> > seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
> >2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
> > It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any
> > reason (that I spotted) in 2.6.12-rc4-mm1
>
> Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date
Wooo!
> patches here:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/2315_ide-no-lba.patch
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/4345_it8212.patch
Didn't use these patches. Just went to 13-rc6 for now to test. All works
as before with the following errors on bootup:
[227523.229512] hda: max request size: 128KiB
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
[227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
[227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
Error }
[227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
[227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[227524.379085] hda1
[227524.379710] hdc: max request size: 128KiB
[227524.379752] hdc: 120103200 sectors (61492 MB) w/1821KiB Cache,
CHS=16383/255/63, BUG
[227524.379825] hdc: cache flushes not supported
[227524.379991] hdc:hdc: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
Error }
[227524.380702] hdc: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError }
[227524.380748] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[227525.536757] hdc1 hdc2
/dev/hda:
Model=ST3200822A, FwRev=3.01, SerialNo=3LJ22Y8F
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=65535/1/63, CurSects=4128705, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
AdvancedPM=no
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2:
* signifies the current active mode
/dev/hdc:
Model=IC35L060AVV207-0, FwRev=V22OA63A, SerialNo=VNVB01G2RAK8XH
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=52
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1821kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=120103200
IORDY=on/off
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
AdvancedPM=no
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a:
* signifies the current active mode
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
greatest tribute."
- High Court Judge Michael Kirby
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
CaT wrote: 1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7. 2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset. It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any reason (that I spotted) in 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date patches here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/2315_ide-no-lba.patch http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/trunk/2.6.12/4345_it8212.patch Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
IT8212/ITE RAID
Having an IDE card with one of these chipsets has left me with a bit of a quandry. I've seen 2 different patch, both seemingly not going anywhere. 1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7. 2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset. It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any reason (that I spotted) in 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 Now, I'd like to upgrade my kernel to cover the security patches releases since 11ac7 but... do I extract the ac driver or the mm driver and try to use it? Will my data be eaten? Is there any chance of seeing either driver in the kernel, proper? Just wondering which way to go and stuff. :/ -- "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the greatest tribute." - High Court Judge Michael Kirby - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
