Re: USB Cameras plea for help
Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 15 November 2002 08:53 am, Ken Moffat espoused: Kevin O'Gorman wrote: I could use help getting my camera mounted. It's a Fuji that mounts as a removable drive when I plug it into a Windows USB port. ++ kevin I just got a Fuji Finepix 3800, great camera so far, but I'm in the same boat as you on mounting! I think it uses USB mass storage, which is listed as experimental, but I'm searching for clues. YOU need usb mass storage, do not need clues. I did modprobe usb-storage. Doesn't seeem to work, but I'm sure it's me being bone-headed. Sometimes the camera shows up in usbview, but I can't figure what to mount. Here is what I see in usbview: USB Mass Storage Serial Number: Y-406^020925XFPX0001016024 Speed: 12Mb/s (full) USB Version: 1.10 Device Class: 00(ifc ) Device Subclass: 00 Device Protocol: 00 Maximum Default Endpoint Size: 64 Number of Configurations: 1 Vendor Id: 04cb Product Id: 011a Revision Number: 10.00 Config Number: 1 Number of Interfaces: 1 Attributes: c0 MaxPower Needed: 0mA Interface Number: 0 Name: (none) Alternate Number: 0 Class: 08(stor.) Sub Class: 5 Protocol: 0 Number of Endpoints: 3 Endpoint Address: 81 Direction: in Attribute: 2 Type: Bulk Max Packet Size: 64 Interval: 0ms Endpoint Address: 02 Direction: out Attribute: 2 Type: Bulk Max Packet Size: 64 Interval: 0ms Endpoint Address: 83 Direction: in Attribute: 3 Type: Int. Max Packet Size: 8 Interval: 1ms -- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: USB cameras poll
Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 15 November 2002 09:04 am, Ken Moffat espoused: The universal readers support everything but xD cards. They're cool, but too new, I guess. Oh no not another type of mem card, sheesh, just waht is needed. I am using a Imagemate sddr31 Ah, yes. These xD cards are about the size of a nickel. -- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT:Fw: Run Old Versions of Microsoft with Windows XP Pro!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:39:05 +0100 begin Zoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: At 12:09 13/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: Windows NT and Windows 98 are no longer preinstalled on PC's. Downgrade Rights provide companies that are not currently able to migrate to a more current operating system the ability to use the company's preferred OS until there is a more efficient time to migrate. When the company is ready to migrate to Windows XP Pro, there are no additional costs or licensing requirements. *** Ofcourse not, the licenses have allready been paied for. The W2k or whatever other CD they will use and XP's that came with the PC. What is the gain here except a direct one for MS and some time bought for the company? In the mean time MS' user statistics show the enormous popularity of the new XP system... which the sheep have paied for but are not using. Great, makes you realy love the IT future seen by MS... Not to mention, most new laptops built since XP don't have drivers for Win2k, etc. Tke this along with the We'll Break Your Apps announcement and with no imagination at all you can see they'll force everyone onto XP in no time. Because apps will not run on anything but XP. Ciao, David A. Bandel - -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE91N2V3uVcotqGMQcRAoVUAKCTiC3Liv+KDoVPX8Bj9R8DocmjOQCfW3BZ v8mEAFBUXsAzxNKaUPuPIZo= =dp3I -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
build of glibc-2.2.5 bombs out
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing about 10 minutes in with the error: exec: illegal option: -C Anyone have any ideas, or seen this before? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
anyone wine experts?
I'm trying to build wine-20021031 in order to get MPlayer to play Quicktimes. Up until yesteray, i had a much older wine-20011103 on my box, and it worked just fine. The new wine that i built seg faults, and then core dumps whenever i run it. I've run it through strace, and i doni't see anything obvious going wrong. Anyone have any ideas? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT:Fw: Run Old Versions of Microsoft with Windows XP Pro!
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:42:13AM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:39:05 +0100 begin Zoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: At 12:09 13/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: Windows NT and Windows 98 are no longer preinstalled on PC's. Downgrade Rights provide companies that are not currently able to migrate to a more current operating system the ability to use the company's preferred OS until there is a more efficient time to migrate. When the company is ready to migrate to Windows XP Pro, there are no additional costs or licensing requirements. This is proving to be a major problem for companies who have contracts with school systems requiring multi-year support, and where there are strict budget restraints. Another problem is that much of the ``educational'' software doesn't run on XP in any case. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``...I'm not one of those who think Bill Gates is the devil. I simply suspect that if Microsoft ever met up with the devil, it wouldn't need an interpreter.'' -- Nick Petreley ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mozilla and Yahoo's 'Net Radio
Has anybody gotten Mozilla to work with Yahoo's Net Radio? Can do everything here: http://launch.yahoo.com/launchcast/setup.asp Except the final Create My Station button does nothing. Using Mozilla 1.0.1 that came with RedHat 8.0 Thanks, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla and Yahoo's 'Net Radio
On 11/15/2002 1:32 PM, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: Has anybody gotten Mozilla to work with Yahoo's Net Radio? Can do everything here: http://launch.yahoo.com/launchcast/setup.asp Except the final Create My Station button does nothing. Using Mozilla 1.0.1 that came with RedHat 8.0 Thanks, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Nevermind, looks like a known tech evangelism bug. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131426 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
FTC targets deceptive spam
Here's another article for you, David.. :) http://computerworld.com/newsletter/0%2C4902%2C75880%2C0.html?nlid=AM msg08480/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: USB cameras poll
AFAIK, there is no standard. You just have to find the app that does what you need, with the camera you have. On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote: Is there a standard? If so, what is it? On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:33:29 -0500(EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think its also worthwhile to clarify that gphoto is not the 'standard' for controlling digitial cameras. Thus, looking at its compatibility list you're not going to get a full picture of which cameras can perform the operations Roger listed below. On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: Through all this I think one needs to define what how they want to access the camera: - Simply get the images - USB - some sort of smart media - Control the camera - just to get images off of it - manipulate settings and get pictures - GUI or command line Most cameras will do some of these, some will do all. So, to say a camera works is a bit incomplete. The gphoto site maintain a list of the cameras that work with the two version of their library (gphoto and gphoto2). Too bad the nice gphoto GUI only works with the original gphoto lib, which supports far fewer cameras. The gphoto2 library is limited to a command line app. I have never gotten gphoto2 to work in konqueror, which has a module for this. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: build of glibc-2.2.5 bombs out
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing about 10 minutes in with the error: exec: illegal option: -C Lonni, sorry, I haven't come across this one yet and I've compiled 2.2.5 a lot... I've been using gcc 2.95.3 and modutils 2.4.12. -- ** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net 5:47pm up 10 days, 22:14, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: build of glibc-2.2.5 bombs out
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Jerry McBride wrote: On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing about 10 minutes in with the error: exec: illegal option: -C Lonni, sorry, I haven't come across this one yet and I've compiled 2.2.5 a lot... I've been using gcc 2.95.3 and modutils 2.4.12. the version of modutils matters? since exec is part of bash, which version of bash did you have? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: linux-usb.org
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:46:09PM -0600, ronnie gauthier wrote: DNS server? On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:26:32 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:55:37AM -0800, Ken Moffat wrote: I have been getting 'connection refused' from linux-usb.org for a couple of days. Anyone else? Not here, provided I use www.linux-usb.org. linux-usb.org *does* return the error you mention. Misconfigured Web server, IMHO. Perhaps: $ host linux-usb.org linux-usb.org has address 205.252.248.112 $ host www.linux-usb.org www.linux-usb.org is an alias for vhost.sourceforge.net. vhost.sourceforge.net has address 216.136.171.204 Kurt -- Peace, n.: In international affairs, a period of cheating between two periods of fighting. -- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: build of glibc-2.2.5 bombs out
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:16:24AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing about 10 minutes in with the error: exec: illegal option: -C If something is invoking exec, perhaps it means exec -c. That said, make accepts a -C option which might be buggering something up. Kurt -- Anybody who doesn't cut his speed at the sight of a police car is probably parked. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: build of glibc-2.2.5 bombs out
On 11/15/2002 06:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:16:24AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
If something is invoking exec, perhaps it means exec -c. That said,
make accepts a -C option which might be buggering something up.
Well, i found this patch for scripts/cpp:
--- scripts/cpp.~1.2.~ Thu Dec 6 10:20:25 2001
+++ scripts/cpp Fri Jan 11 10:34:56 2002
@@ -15,8 +15,12 @@
fi
fi
fi
+if test -z $cpp; then
+ echo cpp not found 2
+ exit 1
+fi
-exec $cpp $*
+exec $cpp ${1+$@}
Local Variables:
mode: sh
End:
And things got a bit further on the next attempt, until it bombed here:
/usr/src/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path
/usr/src/glibc-build:/usr/src/glibc-build/math:/usr/src/glibc-build/elf:/usr/src/glibc-build/dlfcn:/usr/src/glibc-build/nss:/usr/src/glibc-build/nis:/usr/src/glibc-build/rt:/usr/src/glibc-build/resolv:/usr/src/glibc-build/crypt:/usr/src/glibc-build/linuxthreads
/usr/src/glibc-build/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c
rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o /usr/src/glibc-build/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
cpp not found
/usr/src/glibc-build/sunrpc/rpcgen: C preprocessor failed with exit code 1
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/glibc-build/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.stmp] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.2.5/sunrpc'
make[1]: *** [sunrpc/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.2.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2
ugh.
--
~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
7:25pm up 34 days, 8:40, 2 users, load average: 0.25, 0.52, 0.55
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: write your congressperson to support the DMCRA
DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote: This bill (the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act) will help right some of the wrongs the DMCA has imposed on us. It's slated to be one of the first things Congress discusses when the new session starts. The EFF has a page setup to automatically send a letter to your correct representative. Visit http://action.eff.org/action/index.asp?step=2item=2224 now! And thanks! did it. cool site. -- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: USB Cameras plea for help
Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 15 November 2002 08:45 pm, Ken Moffat espoused: I did modprobe usb-storage. Doesn't seeem to work, but I'm sure it's me being bone-headed. Sometimes the camera shows up in usbview, but I can't figure what to mount. Here is what I see in usbview: What shows up in dmesg re the usb mass storage, and is it assigned a driver i /dev? I have found something else: when I try cdrecord --scanbus after connecting and disconnecting the camera it locks up, freezing the terminal. I am using a cd-rw as ide-scsi and I also have a dvd (not ide-scsi). Maybe there is a conflict? Early in dmesg is the following: usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 584 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 19 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 1172 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 1438 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 9 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 704 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 hub.c: USB hub found hub.c: 2 ports detected usb-uhci.c: v1.275:USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver usb.c: registered new driver hid hid-core.c: v1.8.1 Andreas Gal, Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] hid-core.c: USB HID support drivers Further down is: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00 Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usb.c: registered new driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. Later is a mess: hub.c: USB new device connect on bus3/1, assigned device number 2 scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices resize_dma_pool: unknown device type -1 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 3, frame# 95 i2c-core.o: i2c core module i2c-algo-bit.o: i2c bit algorithm module Linux video capture interface: v1.00 bttv: driver version 0.7.91 loaded bttv: using 2 buffers with 2080k (4160k total) for capture bttv: Host bridge is VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8367 [KT266] usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 584 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 19 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 1172 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 1438 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 9 ret -84 usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed dev 2 rqt 128 rq 6 len 256 ret -84 usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 2, frame# 704 [this continues for a while with different frame numbers] Then this: Attached scsi generic sg1 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type -1 resize_dma_pool: unknown device type -1 Thanks! -- Ken Moffat ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Flash Player
Flash was working fine until I upgraded it tonight. (Why do I insist on fixing things that aren't broken?) Now it crashes everytime I go to www.stars-stripes.com (or any other flash site). So I deleted it, took the original files of my spare computer and it still crashes. I wiped out every remnant of flash on my system copied the old files into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and it still crashes. So I booted into root and voila it runs, back into a user acount and it crashes, log into a terminal and su and run mozilla it crashes. It's been 2 long hours now and a lot less hair any Ideas would be great. Red Hat 8, Mozilla 1.0.1 Thanks Mike F -- Michael Fakaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Flash Player
Upgraded from what? The exact version was 5.01 r48, came with RH8 Was a new version of flash released recently? The version I downloaded today from Macromedia was 5.01 r50 I was hoping it might run a website my kids like to go to play games And what do you mean by 'crashes'? It just stops dead, freezes before the page will load Are you sure that mozilla is actually cleanly terminating, No it isn't, to get it to run again I have to manually kill mozilla-bin and not leaving any processes behind? If its running as root, and not as a normal user, then that's got to be something permissions related. I tried switching permissions of the 2 flash files all around and nothing changed Thanks for the suggestion though. Regards Mike -- Michael Fakaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Flash Player
On 11/15/2002 10:42 PM, Michael Fakaro wrote: Upgraded from what? The exact version was 5.01 r48, came with RH8 Was a new version of flash released recently? The version I downloaded today from Macromedia was 5.01 r50 That's the version that i've been using for months without a problem. I was hoping it might run a website my kids like to go to play games And what do you mean by 'crashes'? It just stops dead, freezes before the page will load Which sites have you tried? Are you sure that mozilla is actually cleanly terminating, No it isn't, to get it to run again I have to manually kill mozilla-bin Do you mean 'killall mozilla-bin'? 'kill mozilla-bin' is incorrect syntax and won't kill anything. Either way, did you look at the process list and verify that its no longer running? and not leaving any processes behind? If its running as root, and not as a normal user, then that's got to be something permissions related. I tried switching permissions of the 2 flash files all around and nothing changed Are you running mozilla from the command line? Is it spitting out errors? -- ~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 10:35pm up 34 days, 11:50, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.41, 0.48 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Flash Player
Where did you get the version of Mozilla that you're running? If not from ftp.mozilla.org, perhaps you should try theirs. Who knows what redhat might have done. On 11/15/2002 11:10 PM, Michael Fakaro wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 22:38, Net Llama! wrote: That's the version that i've been using for months without a problem. Wish I could say the same Which sites have you tried? www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now Are you sure that mozilla is actually Do you mean 'killall mozilla-bin'? 'kill mozilla-bin' is incorrect syntax and won't kill anything. Either way, did you look at the process list and verify that its no longer running? Yes according to the list it's no longer running, I actually kill it from the list using the system monitor Are you running mozilla from the command line? Is it spitting out errors? No but when I do the cursor just goes back to the prompt after I kill it,and it only says killed -- ~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 11:00pm up 34 days, 12:15, 3 users, load average: 1.13, 0.82, 0.45 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
