Re: rpm install

2003-08-04 Thread Collins Richey
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:44 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Yes that showed it Tim, however as Lonni said I need the devel of that
 which I cannot find anywhere.
 
 I have the tarball of gtk+2.2.2 but it will not compile because the
 glib version I have is incorrect. So I have compiled glib 2.2.2 but
 that is not enough, or because its a tarball its not seen. or ATK is
 the wrong version but the best i can see is 1.2.4 and the compile
 wants 2.1.4. Sh** its just a merry-go-round.
 

My sympathies; been there, done that.  

That's why I gave up on the RPM based distros.  My distro takes a few
days of compiling, but all the appropriate runtime, devel, and
documentation entities are filed oway where they belong, and I never
need to worry about the dependancies.

Alas, as dep would say, when you're done, all you've got is gentoo, the
distro for crazies. grin

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Keith Antoine
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:36 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote:
 Keith Antoine wrote:
  At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
  rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
  package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
  rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after
  installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find
  any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?

 For locate try running updatedb and for rpm try rpm --rebuilddb and
 see if you still have that prob...

Yes I did that all to no avail, did not fix the anything.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Keith Antoine
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
 On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
  At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
  rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
  package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
  rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after
  installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find
  any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?

 A bit of each  :)

 try:
 rpm -qa | grep gtk+

Right, this is the result:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] kantoine]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.2-4mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Net Llama!
On 08/03/03 01:34, Keith Antoine wrote:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:

On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:

At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after
installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find
any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?
A bit of each  :)

try:
rpm -qa | grep gtk+


Right, this is the result:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] kantoine]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'.  You still need to install 
gtk+2.0-devel

--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  7:50am  up 19 days, 10:32,  1 user,  load average: 0.32, 0.30, 0.16

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Tim Wunder
On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
 On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
  On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
   At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
   rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
   package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
   rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after
   installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot

it? What is telling you that gtk+ is not installed. rpm? Well, that's 
because the package is called gtk+2.0, not gtk+. Try rpm -q gtk+2.0.

   find any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?

FWIW, locate will only find new files after it's database hase been updated 
via updatedb, but you knew that...

 
  A bit of each  :)
 
  try:
  rpm -qa | grep gtk+

 Right, this is the result:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] kantoine]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
 gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
 libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
 libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
 libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk
 libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
 gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
 libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
 libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
 libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
 libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.2-4mdk
 libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk

You seem to have two versions of libgtk+2.0_0-devel installed. Don't know if 
that matters, but I'd try removing the two and installing only one.

HTH, 
Tim

-- 
RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-18.8,  KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1
 10:20am  up 41 days, 11:13,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.06
Help! I'm addicted to Klickety!

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Keith Antoine
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:

 OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'.  You still need to install
 gtk+2.0-devel

Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere 
online. Not in rpmfind or mandrake lists.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Keith Antoine
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:54 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
 On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine 
wrote:
  On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
   On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do
an rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install
the package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode
I rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after
installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot

 it? What is telling you that gtk+ is not installed. rpm? Well, that's
 because the package is called gtk+2.0, not gtk+. Try rpm -q gtk+2.0.

Yes that showed it Tim, however as Lonni said I need the devel of that which I 
cannot find anywhere.

I have the tarball of gtk+2.2.2 but it will not compile because the glib 
version I have is incorrect. So I have compiled glib 2.2.2 but that is not 
enough, or because its a tarball its not seen. or ATK is the wrong version
but the best i can see is 1.2.4 and the compile wants 2.1.4. Sh** its just a 
merry-go-round.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-03 Thread Andrew Mathews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine wrote:
| On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
|
|
|OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'.  You still need to install
|gtk+2.0-devel
|
|
| Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere
| online. Not in rpmfind or mandrake lists.
|
~From the gtk website: http://www.gtk.org/download/
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.0/binary/RedHat-7.3/RPMS/i386/gtk2-devel-2.0.5-1gtk.i386.rpm
- --
Andrew Mathews
- -
~  4:09pm  up 21 days, 20:19,  9 users,  load average: 1.13, 1.15, 1.16
- -
I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
-- Mark Twain
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/LYj2idHQ0m/kEssRAtalAJ94b03hX4gVCErg62c9K1+5trUWOQCfVtZY
sxuK8LjRjoPdZHNL/fG+69M=
=V6JN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-02 Thread Net Llama!
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:

At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q 
gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I 
tried for about the third time, but in command mode I 
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after installing it 
obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find any of its libs 
etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?
A bit of each  :)

try:
rpm -qa | grep gtk+
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  4:10pm  up 18 days, 18:52,  3 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-02 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Keith Antoine:
 At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q 
 gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I 
 tried for about the third time, but in command mode I 
 rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after installing it 
 obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find any of its libs 
 etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?

Yes. ;-)

Kurt
-- 
An American's a person who isn't afraid to criticize the President but
is always polite to traffic cops.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: rpm install

2003-08-02 Thread Ted Ozolins
Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q 
gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I 
tried for about the third time, but in command mode I 
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm after installing it 
obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot find any of its libs 
etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?
For locate try running updatedb and for rpm try rpm --rebuilddb and 
see if you still have that prob...

--
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users