Re: (no subject)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Typing furiously on February 12, Cyberclops managed to emit: > > What in hell is this s**t? > > A stock, witty reply to "ping". As in "ping pong". > > A slightly less hostile question would have sufficed. As would not spamming the list with the same thing 10 times in succession. Forget ping, try __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
Typing furiously on February 12, Cyberclops managed to emit: > What in hell is this s**t? A stock, witty reply to "ping". As in "ping pong". A slightly less hostile question would have sufficed. Kurt -- "If that man in the PTL is such a healer, why can't he make his wife's hairdo go down?" -- Robin Williams ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Bill Day wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pongOn Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: ping___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the aboveURL.
Re: (no subject)
Ping Two dilyard root wrote: >ping >___ >Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users >Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL. > ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
What in hell is this s**t? Net Llama wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> pong--- dilyard root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ping___Linux-users mailing list -http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at theabove URL. __Do You Yahoo!?Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!http://greetings.yahoo.com___Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-usersSubscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
pong On Monday 11 February 2002 21:12, you were heard blurting out: > ping > ___ > Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above > URL. -- Bill Day Our crystal tears now fall upon the ashes, but from the dust shall grow a spirit, to be in compassion for those who are lost, and one in determination to break those who dare test our resolve to be free... 9/11/01 http://www.daysdomain.com/tribute.html 9:30pm up 194 days, 12:24, 13 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
pong --- dilyard root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ping > ___ > Linux-users mailing list - > http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the > above URL. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:18,Kurt Wall scribed: > Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit: > > dilyard root babbled on about: > > > pong > > > > ignore him. he's a smart@$$ > > There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of > them. ;-) > > Kurt Anyone seen a spare Halo of late, seems one went missing from underneath a hat !! -- Keith Antoine aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:18:09 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit: > > dilyard root babbled on about: > > > pong > > > > ignore him. he's a smart@$$ > > There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of > them. ;-) > It's the smart@$$$ on this list that keep the rest of us dumb@$$$in line. Collins Richey - Denver Area WWTLRD? - FreeBSD 4.4 + xfce + sylpheed ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
Scribbling feverishly on January 21, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit: > dilyard root babbled on about: > > pong > > ignore him. he's a smart@$$ There are several such on this list. I, of course, am not one of them. ;-) Kurt -- You now have Asian Flu. ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
dilyard root babbled on about: > pong ignore him. he's a smart@$$ -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf How do you know when you're out of invisible ink? ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
On Saturday 19 January 2002 10 22:45 pm, Net Llama dropped these nuggets of information: > > Yea, my wife truly had an intense passion for IHOPs as well. We figured > out that the nearest one to Pittsburgh was somewhere in northern > Virginia, followed by one near Detroit, MI. > Now that we've moved to California there are IHOPs all over the place, > including 1 less than a mile from where we live. She's quite happy. An IHOP less that a mile, you all are lucky. I think there used to be one in Northern Kentucky, maybe closer to Lexington, a long time ago. I seem to remember passing it on our way to Florida on vacation as a kid. Its long gone though. I spied one in Tennessee on one of our many trips to the Smokies in the last couple of years though we have never stopped at it. Next time we go, I have to stop. -- Tom Wilson Register Linux user # 199331 I used to be with it, then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it anymore and whats it seems strange and scary to me. ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
--- Tom Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 19 January 2002 3 15:15 pm, Douglas J Hunley dropped > these > nuggets of information: > > Tom Wilson babbled on about: > > > Will you be having you hash browns smothered, covered, scattered, > and > > > diced? > > > > kurt didn't have any actually. I had scattered, covered, chunked. > > Ah yes. Very nice. I truly enjoy the Waffle House. It has been some > time > though since I have dined there. > > I also enjoy, when on trips down south, a breakfast at IHOP. Too bad > there > aren't any in this wonderful state of Ohio. (None that I have seen > anyway). Yea, my wife truly had an intense passion for IHOPs as well. We figured out that the nearest one to Pittsburgh was somewhere in northern Virginia, followed by one near Detroit, MI. Now that we've moved to California there are IHOPs all over the place, including 1 less than a mile from where we live. She's quite happy. = Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
On Saturday 19 January 2002 8 20:07 pm, Douglas J Hunley dropped these nuggets of information: > Tom Wilson babbled on about: > > I also enjoy, when on trips down south, a breakfast at IHOP. Too bad > > there aren't any in this wonderful state of Ohio. (None that I have seen > > anyway). > > where in Ohio are you? That fine little burg know as CIncinnati. -- Tom Wilson Register Linux user # 199331 I used to be with it, then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it anymore and whats it seems strange and scary to me. ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
Tom Wilson babbled on about: > I also enjoy, when on trips down south, a breakfast at IHOP. Too bad there > aren't any in this wonderful state of Ohio. (None that I have seen > anyway). where in Ohio are you? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf How do you know when you're out of invisible ink? ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
On Saturday 19 January 2002 3 15:15 pm, Douglas J Hunley dropped these nuggets of information: > Tom Wilson babbled on about: > > Will you be having you hash browns smothered, covered, scattered, and > > diced? > > kurt didn't have any actually. I had scattered, covered, chunked. Ah yes. Very nice. I truly enjoy the Waffle House. It has been some time though since I have dined there. I also enjoy, when on trips down south, a breakfast at IHOP. Too bad there aren't any in this wonderful state of Ohio. (None that I have seen anyway). -- Tom Wilson Register Linux user # 199331 I used to be with it, then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it anymore and whats it seems strange and scary to me. ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Re: (no subject)
Tom Wilson babbled on about: > Will you be having you hash browns smothered, covered, scattered, and > diced? kurt didn't have any actually. I had scattered, covered, chunked. -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf I don't pirate MS software. It wouldn't be worth the price.. ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Saturday 19 January 2002 3 03:21 am, Kurt Wall dropped these nuggets of information: > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Bruce Marshall managed to emit: > > On Friday 18 January 2002 22:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > > > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > > > > tsting > > > > > > wrkng > > > > > > K > > > > Say wht? > > Doug and I are having breakfast at a Waffle House in Columbus, OH > later this morning. I'm passing through on my way to Pittsburgh. > > Kurt Will you be having you hash browns smothered, covered, scattered, and diced? M. -- Tom Wilson Register Linux user # 199331 I used to be with it, then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it anymore and whats it seems strange and scary to me. ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Scribbling feverishly on January 19, David Aikema managed to emit: > On January 18, 2002 07:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > > > tsting > > > > wrkng > > I think you misspelled that. It should be "wrking". You've gotta stay true > to form after all. Consistency, perchance? I think it was Mencken that remarked a foolishly held consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. ;-) If it wasn't Mencken, it's the kind of remark he *would* have made if he'd thought of it... Kurt -- You're being followed. Cut out the hanky-panky for a few days. ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On January 18, 2002 07:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > > tsting > > wrkng I think you misspelled that. It should be "wrking". You've gotta stay true to form after all. David Aikema ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Bruce Marshall managed to emit: > On Friday 18 January 2002 22:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > > > tsting > > > > wrkng > > > > K > > Say wht? Doug and I are having breakfast at a Waffle House in Columbus, OH later this morning. I'm passing through on my way to Pittsburgh. Kurt -- Afternoon very favorable for romance. Try a single person for a change. ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Friday 18 January 2002 22:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > > tsting > > wrkng > > K Say wht? -- ++ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 01/18/02 23:32 + ++ "Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by moving from where you left them to where you can't find them." ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Kurt Wall babbled on about:
> Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit:
> > tsting
>
> wrkng
thanks! see you in the morn
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf
printk("HPFS: G... Kernel memory corrupted ... going on, but
it'll crash very soon :-(\n");
2.4.3 linux/fs/hpfs/super.c
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Scribbling feverishly on January 18, Sys Admin managed to emit: > tsting wrkng K -- You will engage in a profitable business activity. ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Jay Nugent babbled on about: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Sys Admin wrote: > > tsting > >It's not working... Some vowels are being dropped :-( good one ;) -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://linux.nf If NT is your answer, you don't understand the question ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Sys Admin wrote: > tsting It's not working... Some vowels are being dropped :-( "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) ++ | Jay Nugent [EMAIL PROTECTED](734)971-1076(734)971-4529/Fax| | Nugent Telecommunications [www.nuge.com] (734)649-0850/Cell | | Internet Consulting/Linux SysAdmin/Engineering & Design/ISP Reseller | | ISP Monitoring [www.ispmonitor.net] ISP & Modem Performance Monitoring | | Web-Pegasus[www.webpegasus.com] Web Hosting/DNS Hosting/Shell Accts| | LinuxNIC, Inc. [www.linuxnic.net] Registrar of the .linux TLD| ++ 8:00pm up 4 days, 2:25, 7 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.01 ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:49:19 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Collins Richey wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 "David A. Bandel" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Collins Richey wrote: > >> > >>[snip] > >> > >>>Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 > >>>patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. > >>> > >>> > >>Let me try one more time: > >>normal patches from one revision level to another (2.4.16 to > 2.4.17 > >>to > >>2.4.18) must be applied in order successively. > >> > >>-pre and -ac patches need to have the previous one removed before > >>applying the new one (patch -R -p0 -i xxx-pre1 ; patch -p0 -i > >>xxx-pre2). > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks, David > > > > That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this > means, > > if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very > latest > > -pren or -acn patch? > > > correct (assuming you're using the correct base) > > > > > > One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods, > > depending on whether still compressed or not, location, etc.) > patch > > -p0, the patch always fails. I have to use patch -p1. Could you > > explain this > > > very simply, this: > look in the patch at the first line: > > diff -Nur linux-2.4.15/Makefile linux/Makefile > > > This line shows you how (and where) the patch was created. To apply > this patch, you should be in the directory where linux (either as a > directory or symlink) exists. So what will be patched is > linux/Makefile. > > If you don't have linux or a symlink, but only linux-2.4.16 and > don't > want to create a symlink, then cd into linux-2.4.16 and use -p1. > > When you use -p1, the first part of the name will be stripped > (linux/), > leaving you with Makefile, which is what will be patched. Big note: > while the kernel patches put out by Linus and Alan Cox are > standardized > and will always be the same, anyone creating a patch can create it > anywhere in the source tree (or above it) (s)he wants to. So you > may > find patches you have to cd well down into the source tree to apply. > Just read the first line of the patch for a clue as to where to > start. > Each successive -p# removes one more part of the name. So if the > patch > says: usr/src/linux/Makefile and you're in src/, you'll need to use > -p2. > > Now, the -R is (ostensibly) for Reversing the patch. This is not > entirely accurate (even if it is true). What it does is apply the > patch > in reverse order using linux/, but going from the second to the > first > rather than the first to the second. That is, rather than change > lines > that begin with - to look the lines that begin +, it changes the > lines > that look like + to ones that look like -. > > Clear as mud? > Very clear; it's a keeper for me. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Collins Richey wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 "David A. Bandel" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Collins Richey wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 >>>patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. >>> >>> >>Let me try one more time: >>normal patches from one revision level to another (2.4.16 to 2.4.17 >>to >>2.4.18) must be applied in order successively. >> >>-pre and -ac patches need to have the previous one removed before >>applying the new one (patch -R -p0 -i xxx-pre1 ; patch -p0 -i >>xxx-pre2). >> >> >> >> > > Thanks, David > > That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this means, > if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very latest > -pren or -acn patch? correct (assuming you're using the correct base) > > One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods, > depending on whether still compressed or not, location, etc.) patch > -p0, the patch always fails. I have to use patch -p1. Could you > explain this very simply, this: look in the patch at the first line: diff -Nur linux-2.4.15/Makefile linux/Makefile This line shows you how (and where) the patch was created. To apply this patch, you should be in the directory where linux (either as a directory or symlink) exists. So what will be patched is linux/Makefile. If you don't have linux or a symlink, but only linux-2.4.16 and don't want to create a symlink, then cd into linux-2.4.16 and use -p1. When you use -p1, the first part of the name will be stripped (linux/), leaving you with Makefile, which is what will be patched. Big note: while the kernel patches put out by Linus and Alan Cox are standardized and will always be the same, anyone creating a patch can create it anywhere in the source tree (or above it) (s)he wants to. So you may find patches you have to cd well down into the source tree to apply. Just read the first line of the patch for a clue as to where to start. Each successive -p# removes one more part of the name. So if the patch says: usr/src/linux/Makefile and you're in src/, you'll need to use -p2. Now, the -R is (ostensibly) for Reversing the patch. This is not entirely accurate (even if it is true). What it does is apply the patch in reverse order using linux/, but going from the second to the first rather than the first to the second. That is, rather than change lines that begin with - to look the lines that begin +, it changes the lines that look like + to ones that look like -. Clear as mud? Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Collins Richey wrote: % % Thanks, David % % That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this means, % if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very latest % -pren or -acn patch? % % One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods, % depending on whether still compressed or not, location, etc.) patch % -p0, the patch always fails. I have to use patch -p1. Could you % explain this So, cd up one more directory level (say, from /usr/src/linux to /usr/src) before applying the patch. The number following -p indicates the number of directories (prefixed by "/") patch should strip off the filenames embedded in the patch file before applying the patch to the filesystem. So, given a patch file containing a pathname foo/bar/baz/somefile.c: patch -p0 yields foo/bar/baz/somefile.c patch -p1 yields bar/baz/somefile.c patch -p2 yields baz/somefile.c Keep in mind that patch works relative to the current directory. So, in the first example, foo/bar/baz/somefile.c has to exist in foo/bar/baz from your current directory, or the patch will fail. Clear? Kurt -- "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Collins Richey wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 > > patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. > > > > Let me try one more time: > normal patches from one revision level to another (2.4.16 to 2.4.17 > to > 2.4.18) must be applied in order successively. > > -pre and -ac patches need to have the previous one removed before > applying the new one (patch -R -p0 -i xxx-pre1 ; patch -p0 -i > xxx-pre2). > > > Thanks, David That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this means, if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very latest -pren or -acn patch? One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods, depending on whether still compressed or not, location, etc.) patch -p0, the patch always fails. I have to use patch -p1. Could you explain this -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
Collins Richey wrote: [snip] > > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 > patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several > files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume > -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is this usual with > kernel patches. I don't have a clue what to do about these. Did I > make the right choices? Is this totally normal with kernel patches? > I'm afraid to use the resulting kernel source until I know more. > Let me try one more time: normal patches from one revision level to another (2.4.16 to 2.4.17 to 2.4.18) must be applied in order successively. -pre and -ac patches need to have the previous one removed before applying the new one (patch -R -p0 -i xxx-pre1 ; patch -p0 -i xxx-pre2). Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 23:52 pm, Jerry McBride wrote: > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in > my OS/2 days! Gess it doesn't take much to get you going :o) (an old OS/2 camper) -- ++ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 11/29/01 08:32 + ++ "Microsoft, the Legacy Software Company." ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:09:26 -0700 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500 > > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel > > > sounce was posted for public consumption... > > > > > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > > > > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this > > > much fun in my OS/2 days! > > > > > > > 2.5.0 came out with 2.4.15. They both have the same shutdown > > filesystem corruption error. Fix was 2.4.16 and a patch to 2.5.0. > > Only difference is in the Makefile at the top where one says > > 2.4.15 and the other 2.5.0. > > > > You sure are slow. > > > > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 > patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several > files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume > -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is this usual with > kernel patches. I don't have a clue what to do about these. Did I > make the right choices? Is this totally normal with kernel > patches? > I'm afraid to use the resulting kernel source until I know more. > Fingers working brain off, again. Of course I patched pre1 then pre2. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ---snip--- > You sure are slow. > True enough... but very pleasurable I assure you. :') Aside from that... I didn't notice any traffic that mentioned either 2.5.0 or 2.4.16... I was just being curious. -- ** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux 7:10am up 4 days, 10:41, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500 > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc > was > posted > > for public consumption... > > > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much > fun in my > > OS/2 days! > > > > 2.5.0 came out with 2.4.15. They both have the same shutdown > filesystem > corruption error. Fix was 2.4.16 and a patch to 2.5.0. Only > difference is in > the Makefile at the top where one says 2.4.15 and the other 2.5.0. > > You sure are slow. > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is this usual with kernel patches. I don't have a clue what to do about these. Did I make the right choices? Is this totally normal with kernel patches? I'm afraid to use the resulting kernel source until I know more. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500 Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was posted > for public consumption... > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in my > OS/2 days! > 2.5.0 came out with 2.4.15. They both have the same shutdown filesystem corruption error. Fix was 2.4.16 and a patch to 2.5.0. Only difference is in the Makefile at the top where one says 2.4.15 and the other 2.5.0. You sure are slow. Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. --Nemesis Air Racing Team motto ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
On Thursday 29 November 2001 14:52, Jerry McBride enunciated: > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was > posted for public consumption... > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in > my OS/2 days! The readme in 2.5.0 says that it is the same as 2.4.15/2.4.16 cannot remember which it was as a startpoint . -- Keith Antoine aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Scanners [was Re: (no subject)]
Stuart Biggerstaff wrote: > Thanks to all who replied for the input on the scanner question. Finally, the Epson GT-3 was settled on . Actually not a bad unit for considerably less than many of the other "industrial" ones out there. While still providing document feeding, (what do documents eat anyway?), decent speed, and software it's well inside the price range. If it blows up in the first week...I'll let you know. -- Linux SxS [http://hal.humberc.on.ca/~mrcn0031/sxs/] ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Scanners [was Re: (no subject)]
Quoting Stuart Biggerstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would say... Is there any way around your requirements? > > HP (and Microtek) make pretty decent stuff, but mainly for low-end > graphic > arts work: not high-speed or larger format. Then there's always > Fujitsu, > and they seem affordable for production scanners, but theirs leave you > with > a choice between color and larger formats. VERY good stuff, though. > > Under $1000.00 for one (ScanPartner 15C) that does all you want but is > > 8.5x11 (8.5x14 for the ADF). $4-5000.00 for one (M3096GX) that's > faster, > does 11 x 17, but is monochrome. Unfortunately, theirs just seem to > just > get faster but stay monochrome as you spend more--though it appears > there > is something called the M4097D that is large-format, color, and puts us > > right back where you were before in terms of price. Unfortunately, it's for an office with many people looking for many things. There are interior designers who "need" the large format capacity, and others looking for graphics ability. I have put forth the idea of two seperate scanners, one for general and graphics, and the other, a B&W large format document scanner for the interior desingers...the price tag for two is less than one that can do it all...considerably less. -- Linux SxS [http://hal.humberc.on.ca/~mrcn0031/sxs/] ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Scanners [was Re: (no subject)]
I would say... Is there any way around your requirements? HP (and Microtek) make pretty decent stuff, but mainly for low-end graphic arts work: not high-speed or larger format. Then there's always Fujitsu, and they seem affordable for production scanners, but theirs leave you with a choice between color and larger formats. VERY good stuff, though. Under $1000.00 for one (ScanPartner 15C) that does all you want but is 8.5x11 (8.5x14 for the ADF). $4-5000.00 for one (M3096GX) that's faster, does 11 x 17, but is monochrome. Unfortunately, theirs just seem to just get faster but stay monochrome as you spend more--though it appears there is something called the M4097D that is large-format, color, and puts us right back where you were before in terms of price. At 11:04 PM 9/19/01 -0400, Ian wrote: >Chang wrote: > > > > take a look at http://linux.nf first. > > HP is the usual choice. > > > > Ian Marchak wrote: > > > > >Anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with scanners that are > intended for > > >office use. Namely, I am trying to track down reviews and details on > scanners > > >that include: > > > > > >- D-Size / 11x17 / A3 format > > >- Colour > > >- auto document feeder (50+ page capacity) > > >- Duplex scanning nice but not necessary. > > > > > >Most of the contenders I have found weigh in at 6-7K $US...caught me a > bit off > > >guard. It seems thought that this is about the going rate for this > type of > > >critter. > >HP makes nothing larger than 8.5x14 so they are out the door from the >get go. Stuart Biggerstaff Linda Hall Library 5109 Cherry Kansas City, MO 64110 Phone: (816) 926-8748 (800) 662-1545 x748 FAX:(816) 926-8785 URL:www.lindahall.org ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Scanners [was Re: (no subject)]
Chang wrote: > > take a look at http://linux.nf first. > HP is the usual choice. > > Ian Marchak wrote: > > >Anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with scanners that are intended for > >office use. Namely, I am trying to track down reviews and details on scanners > >that include: > > > >- D-Size / 11x17 / A3 format > >- Colour > >- auto document feeder (50+ page capacity) > >- Duplex scanning nice but not necessary. > > > >Most of the contenders I have found weigh in at 6-7K $US...caught me a bit off > >guard. It seems thought that this is about the going rate for this type of > >critter. HP makes nothing larger than 8.5x14 so they are out the door from the get go. -- Linux SxS [http://hal.humberc.on.ca/~mrcn0031/sxs/] ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
take a look at http://linux.nf first. HP is the usual choice. Ian Marchak wrote: >Anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with scanners that are intended for >office use. Namely, I am trying to track down reviews and details on scanners >that include: > >- D-Size / 11x17 / A3 format >- Colour >- auto document feeder (50+ page capacity) >- Duplex scanning nice but not necessary. > >Most of the contenders I have found weigh in at 6-7K $US...caught me a bit off >guard. It seems thought that this is about the going rate for this type of >critter. > _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: (no subject)
It worked. Interesting, I've only had sporadic trouble with @Home and Yahoo on this list. Jim On Sunday July 29, 2001 4:34 pm, Collins Richey wrote: > test -- 9:42pm up 5 days, 22:16, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Running Caldera eD2.4 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots... _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
