[REBOL] Re: What's next for REBOL... Re:(4)
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 06-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we > will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. In *THAT* case -- me, too;) Dick -- #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=# *Dick Whiting* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _http://www.europa.com/~dwhiting/_ /Satyre/ on Undernet #AmigaCafe# #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=#
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL...
Please count me in too.
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(8)
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Moi aussi, Watakushi mo...me too! > I can only add: Ich auch, ich auch !!! me, too, please :-) regards, Ingo
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(4)
Another other key in using it on IIS or PWS is to remark out the #cgi-bin-location line at the beginning of scripts. If you don't IIS & PWS get very confused and spend time looking for it, will often freeze or timeout. Allen K One the few who has had Rebol cgi running on both PWS and IIS, wanna see my scars? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:18 AM Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(3) > > Well, that set of instructions has worked for others before. The HTTP > header problem may be there if your script does not print out a line > like "content-type: text/html" at the top with a blank line after it. > And usually REBOL is popping up because the -c or --cgi option was not > set up properly so that REBOL runs in CGI mode. > > I thikn that info for WinNT may have been missing the --cgi part in > the line 'c:\path\to\rebol.exe --cgi %s %s'. There should be a --cgi > in there to prevent the window from popping up and do all the useful > CGI stuff. > > Sterling > > > Hate to be slow, but I followed the directions (I think) to the T--. When I > > tried to run a simple form with the code from your howto page, I got the > > following: > > > > CGI Error > > The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of > > HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: > > > > > > Also, when I submitted the script, an instance of Rebol opened on my > > machine?? Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks > > Mark > >
[REBOL] FTP error - tcp 425
Hi, I'm trying to use REBOL to upload a file to my web site using a command like the following, but I keep getting this error. I called my ISP and they said they don't use a proxy. Actually, last night I think the error was "... tcp 500 (PORT none,...)" but I can't remember the rest. >> write %file.html read ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/public/index.html connecting to: members.dca.net ** User Error: Server error: tcp 425 Can't build data connection: Connection refused.. My set-net information is just my email address and mail server followed by 4 "none"s. I was able to read a text file from an anonymous ftp site and write it my hard drive, if that means anything. Is there a setting I'm missing, or am I just doing something incorrectly? Thanks, Joel
[REBOL] More PWS Questions and Issue Re:
Title: More PWS Questions and Issue >> I followed the instructions at http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html , and that was an adventure in itself. Any windows wizards out there willing to write a script or .bat file to make these registry settings easier and less scary for we mortals?? It's nothing you can do from a batch file or script, and, you're right, the Registry is just not meant for mere mortals. Installing perl's the same way. Someone tried to do a setup executable for perl to do the registry updates, but it still doesn't work half the time, and you're back to doing it by hand anyway. It's not uncommon to have to make fixes to registry when using Web services and CGIs on Win32, at least as soon as you step away from "platform neutral" Microsoft products. Welcome to the jungle. --Ted.*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***On 1/7/2000 at 2:59 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate to be whipping a dead horse here, but am still having problems getting Rebol to run as a cgi script on personal web server?? I followed the instructions at http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html , and that was an adventure in itself. Any windows wizards out there willing to write a script or .bat file to make these registry settings easier and less scary for we mortals?? Anyway, after I made the changes, I tried to run a simple form with the cgi-get and cgi-post code from the howto.html...and got the following symptoms: 1) An instance of rebol opened up on my machine?? 2) The CGI script misbehaved and returned incomplete headers. The headers it did return were: and the rest of the screen was blank. I created a virtual directory named Rebol, and gave it execute priviledges, and my url for the form was http://localhost/rebol/cgi-get.r . Hope that someone can help me get this thing going...One writer suggest I run an different (Omni) web server...now this could be an interim option if I could run it on 8080 or something, but I need to continue to run PWS on 80HEEElp, Mark Woodward
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(4)
Nice to see that the Windows / REBOL / CGI problem is still not sorted Maybe it'll be alright when Windows 3000 comes out - lol ... I've been rying to get REBOL to work on PWS for month and I have given up long ago. At least we all get the same error message about headers - I even got the same message on NT server 4 and on SuSe Linux 6.2 (not sure about the version). Just can NOT get rebol CGI to work. Cheers - Happy New Year everyone Marco Double M Seven http://www.doublemseven.co.uk *** Get paid to surf the net! Follow a link below ... it's FREE! http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=HSH-418 http://www.sharkhunt.com/join/join.asp?shID=mm2879 Cool Links http://www.cornwall-uk.com/meister - My personal Web Site http://www.cornwall-uk.com - Cornish Host Site http://www.webweaversearch.co.uk - Web Designer Database http://www.counter-strike.net - Cool Half-Life Multiplayer 'mod' - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 11:58 PM Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(3) > If possible, try testing the script on another server with a CGI that's > known to be working. > > As Sterling mentioned, this sound more like a problem with the script. > The CGI sounds like it's working, and returning an error message > because the script is broken. If the CGI wasn't working at all, it > would return a copy of the script as a text file. > > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 1/7/2000 at 2:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hate to be slow, but I followed the directions (I think) to the T--. > When I tried to run a simple form with the code from your howto page, I > got the following: > CGI Error > The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete > set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: > > > Also, when I submitted the script, an instance of Rebol opened on my > machine?? Any suggestions? > Thanks > Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re: > > > > Get message number 38514 from SELMA or read it at rebol.org: > http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html > Sterling > > I have searched the mailing list for PWS and CGI and even > Microsoft...but > > have not found information on setting up Rebol to work (cgi) with > Personal > > Web Server? > > > > Can someone either tell me, or point to a message thread? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Mark Woodward > > > >
[REBOL] POP from CGI doesn't work
POP from CGI doesn't work
I'm trying to make the sample from rebol.org working as a CGI-app.
(I've sligly modified the code only to display the 2 first messages.)
---begin mailview.r---
REBOL [
Title: "Email Viewer (as web page)"
File: %mailview.r
Date: 10-Sep-1999
Purpose: {
This example displays all of your pending email
as an HTML web page. (But does not remove it.)
}
Note: {
Does not remove the mail from the server.
See the popspec.r file for examples of how
to setup your mailbox connection.
}
]
html: make string! 1 ; where new page is stored
emit: func [data] [append html reduce data]
inbox: open load %popspec.r ;file contains POP email box info
emit [
"Mailbox Summary for " now/date " " now/time
length? inbox " message(s)"
]
for count 1 2 1 [
mail: import-email pick inbox count
emit [
"From:" first mail/from
"Subject:" mail/subject
"Length:" length? mail/content
]
]
emit []
close inbox
print html
---end mailview.r---
---begin popspec.r---
REBOL [
Title: "POP Email Port Spec"
File: %popspec.r
Date: 10-Sep-1999
Purpose: {
POP port specification used to connect to an email
server. All of the mail reading examples use this.
}
Note: {
You can specify either a URL or a block containing
the necessary information to open the POP port.
The block approach is more general, as the username
and password can be prompted for at run time.
}
]
;pop://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; use this, or use:
[
scheme: 'pop
user: "name"
pass: "pass1"
host: "domain.com" ; uncomment if needed.
]
---end popspec.r---
Everything works fine if the program is runned from REBOL. I've tried
both on Win32 and FreeBSD. I've tried it with '--cgi' and '-cs'. It
works fine.
When I run the program from a webserver (I've tried 24Link on Win32,
and Apache on FreeBSD, I get a "500 Server Error".
What is wrong? When the program runs fine outside a webserver, and
doesn't run inside one? I've made other REBOL programs, and they run
well, on a webserver, but when I use "open pop://" it just hangs.
Is this a security issue? Isn't it enought to use '-cs'?
Yours faithfully
Martin Ancher Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[REBOL] Make REBOL/View available for downloading
Carl, Make REBOL/View available at REBOL site! I guess it's better than having so much email addresses to manage Carlos
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(3)
Title: RE: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re: If possible, try testing the script on another server with a CGI that's known to be working. As Sterling mentioned, this sound more like a problem with the script. The CGI sounds like it's working, and returning an error message because the script is broken. If the CGI wasn't working at all, it would return a copy of the script as a text file. *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***On 1/7/2000 at 2:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hate to be slow, but I followed the directions (I think) to the T--. When I tried to run a simple form with the code from your howto page, I got the following: CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: Also, when I submitted the script, an instance of Rebol opened on my machine?? Any suggestions? Thanks Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re: Get message number 38514 from SELMA or read it at rebol.org: http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html Sterling > I have searched the mailing list for PWS and CGI and even Microsoft...but > have not found information on setting up Rebol to work (cgi) with Personal > Web Server? > > Can someone either tell me, or point to a message thread? > > Thanks in advance, > > Mark Woodward >
[REBOL] %REB_MAIL.TXT
%REB_MAIL.TXT
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
This is embarrassing. My first post to the list is a "Me Too". Me too. MikeT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 17:02:20 -0800 Subject:[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... > What's next for REBOL... > "More than just a tool."
[REBOL] Regular Expressions Re:(3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Eric, 7-Jan-2000 you wrote:
>
> >Ole, you suggested this to find a word ending in "ing":
>
> >>> a: [skip a | "ing"]
> >== [skip a | "ing"]
> >>> parse "ringin" a
> >== false
> >>> parse "ringing" a
> >== true
>
> >That's fine, except it won't detect a word ending in "ing" in the
> >middle of the string:
>
> >>> parse "ringing bells" a
> >== false
>
> Ah, then I just got you wrong. The easy way to do the above is first to split
> the text up with
>
> parse str none
>
> and then match the individual words. However, this should work too:
>
> sep: charset " ,.!?" ; and whatever else you want to split up words
> b: [skip b | "ing"]
> a: [b | to "ing" [sep to end | a]]
> parse str a
>
> though it's completely untested, and I agree that it's ugly :-)
This will not work imho :-)
as for "ringing bells"
Again, you are going to reach end of the string, then going back recursively
until first "ing" (applied from end of the string) is not matched. :
>> b: [skip markb: (print ["markb: " markb index? markb]) b | back-b: (print
["back-b: " back-b in
dex? back-b]) "ing"]
== [skip markb: (print ["markb: " markb index? markb]) b | back-b: (print
["back-b: " back-b index
? back-b]) "ing"]
>> parse str a
markb: inging bells 2
markb: nging bells 3
markb: ging bells 4
markb: ing bells 5
markb: ng bells 6
markb: g bells 7
markb: bells 8
markb: ells 10
markb: lls 11
markb: ls 12
markb: s 13
markb: 14
back-b: 14
back-b: s 13
back-b: ls 12
back-b: lls 11
back-b: ells 10
back-b: bells 9
back-b: g bells 7
back-b: ng bells 6
back-b: ing bells 5
== false
Your code will fail with something like "ringing sounding bell" ... it will match
sounding, so generally said - the last occurance of "ing" contained in the string
...
And because of that, second part of 'a - {to "ing" [sep to end | a]}will be NEVER
applied, as your pointer is just behind last occurance of "ing" contained in your
string ... that's why you got false result.
change 'a to [b to end] and once succesfully back from 'b, it will continue "to
end" and return "true" ...
Cheers,
-pekr-
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Ole Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "Ignorance is bliss"
> (Cypher, The Matrix)
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(9)
me too!.. ;) cheers
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
> What's next for REBOL... > "More than just a tool." Hi! I had not much time to read this mailing list in the last weeks. But then I saw a thread which really got quite big. And all the people told everyone "Me too!"... First I was annoyed, but now I browsed to the original mail of this thread... and I think Rebol/View sounds damn cool. So if there will be a beta version for Amiga (please, Carl, Please!!!) count me in... And here you have it: Me too! (Isn't that getting on anyone's nerves? ;-) Maybe I can even use Rebol at some time in the future to help me coordinating AmigaOS 3.5+ betatest. Currently I use Fiasco and ARexx which also works quite well. But imagine I could put up the bug report database on the web for developers and betatesters using Rebol ;-). Or at least make bug reporting media independand... thus email, www, or executing a rebol script to submit a bug report, no matter how, its would always be there. I always waited to Rebol to get some kind of a GUI in the spirit of REBOL... REBOL really deserves to be able to drive GUI driven powerful applications ;-). So, me too! ;-) -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://helios.home.pages.de PGP: http://home.pages.de/~helios/autor/wie-erreichen.html ICQ: #34355756
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
> In that case; please do fling me an Amiga version, once available. :) > > (You might as well send it to all list subscribers by the looks of it...;) Just post it to the list ;-) *nah, just kidding* would not be a good idea to post 20 versions for different platforms to this list. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://helios.home.pages.de PGP: http://home.pages.de/~helios/autor/wie-erreichen.html ICQ: #34355756
[REBOL] Regular Expressions Re:(5)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Petr, 6-Jan-2000 you wrote: > > [...] > >> How about this: > >> > >> >> a: [skip a | "ing"] > >> == [skip a | "ing"] > >> >> parse "ringin" a > >> == false > >> >> parse "ringing" a > >> == true > >> > >> It should do the job. So actually backtracking in Parse can be achieved by > use > >> of the "|" operator in Parse blocks. > > >What? | is simple OR or am I wrong? You will end up in recursion imho. > > That was the very point. Aha, I just thought that you thought "ing" is matched or skip is performed, not knowing of recursion. Well, I should look better at your email adress, as I would recognize, you are experienced reboller :-) Anyway ... your example will fail with "ing" being present somewhere in middle of the text ... I would even sincerely dare to say - it has no sense. You are nesting to recursion while end of string is not matched (let's imagine some 1000 chars = 1000 subrules) and then backtracking by one char, while "ing" or we are not back at the beginning of string ... Or am I wrong? > I just don't see what the problem is. The examples above do exactly as I > wanted. I used "|" as "a backtracker", since it appears to do this: > > First, call recursively on the left side of the "|". If the match succeeds, > return success. No, no chance, You have no chance to match "ing". It will always reach the end of the string. Once returning to upper levels from recursion, backtracking starts > > If the first call didn't return success, It can't because of the reasons mentioned above ... > call recursively on the right side of > the "|" (starting from the same position in the input stream as for the call > on the left side of the "|"). If the match succeeds, return success, > otherwise return failure. > > This is effectively the same as backtracking. > pretty ineffective seems to me ... ... no offense ... > > >See ya, > > >PS: I am somehow tired today to study and comment another examples, sorry :-) > > Me too, I still have to read quite a few pages (of _really_ boring statistics) > before I can go to bed ;-) > I think still better than really bad toothache :-) -pekr- > > Kind regards, > -- > Ole Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "Ignorance is bliss" > (Cypher, The Matrix)
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(3)
Me Too! to testing Rebol/View and to asking where Rebol/Command ??? [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 6:53 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re: > > > Surprise, surprise :-) Thanks Carl! Nice to hear /View is knocking > > the door soon :-) > > Concerning /View: This all sounds quite nice & cool but where is > Rebol/Command? This would solve some every-day problems right now... I'm > still waiting for it. Robert
[REBOL] Evaluation Re:(11)
Howdy, Ladislav: Yep-- you're right. :-) > Hi, thanks, I forgot about it. But, see: > Money: > >> a: $100 == $100.00 >> poke a 2 3 == $3.00 >> a == $100.00 > It seems immutable to me > Date: >> a: 7/1/2000 == 7-Jan-2000 >> poke a 1 8 == 7-Jan-0008 >> a > == 7-Jan-2000 > Time: >> a: 21:21 == 21:21 >> type? a == time! >> poke a 1 22 == > 22:21 >> a == 21:21 > Tuple: >> a: 1.2.3 == 1.2.3 >> type? a == tuple! >> poke a 1 22 == > 22.2.3 >> a == 1.2.3 > So, I think, that although pokable, the values are immutable, which > is not bad. > Ladislav
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
Hi. I'm a REBOL newcomer, but... since I spent all my Christmas (supposed) Holydays studying this wonderful tool, ME TOO!!! ;-) Paolo Russo > > > > rebols, > > Given the popularity of the beta announcement for REBOL/View, would it not be > more sensible to make it available for download on www.rebol.com. > > btw, me too > > thanks, > john > > >>-- > Me too! Asa long as this isn't automatically picking up the addresses, > please can you use my home email rather than this one? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks! > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:21 AM > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > > >> Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we > will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. >> >> -Carl >> >> >> At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: >> >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will > there >> >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... >> >ME TOO. >> > >> >Elliott >> > >> >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> >> Hi: >> >> >> >> I also want to be part of the team >> > >> > >> My >> plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those >> >>> of you who >> want to test drive it. >> > >> >> > > > >
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(3)
Well, that set of instructions has worked for others before. The HTTP header problem may be there if your script does not print out a line like "content-type: text/html" at the top with a blank line after it. And usually REBOL is popping up because the -c or --cgi option was not set up properly so that REBOL runs in CGI mode. I thikn that info for WinNT may have been missing the --cgi part in the line 'c:\path\to\rebol.exe --cgi %s %s'. There should be a --cgi in there to prevent the window from popping up and do all the useful CGI stuff. Sterling > Hate to be slow, but I followed the directions (I think) to the T--. When I > tried to run a simple form with the code from your howto page, I got the > following: > > CGI Error > The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of > HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: > > > Also, when I submitted the script, an instance of Rebol opened on my > machine?? Any suggestions? > > Thanks > Mark
[REBOL] 'first for parse? Re:(4)
Andrew wrote: > > Something like this: > > > > parse str ["sometext" any [thru "a" thru "b" thru "c"] to end] pekr wrote: > Do you mean extension of current 'some and 'any words functionality? I think introduction of new words, as 'first or even 'last would be more descriptive Anything to help make the intent clearer. Andrew Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/ -><-
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
Me, too, please! Andrew Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/ -><-
[REBOL] Regular Expressions Re:(2)
Hi Eric, 7-Jan-2000 you wrote:
>Ole, you suggested this to find a word ending in "ing":
>>> a: [skip a | "ing"]
>== [skip a | "ing"]
>>> parse "ringin" a
>== false
>>> parse "ringing" a
>== true
>That's fine, except it won't detect a word ending in "ing" in the
>middle of the string:
>>> parse "ringing bells" a
>== false
Ah, then I just got you wrong. The easy way to do the above is first to split
the text up with
parse str none
and then match the individual words. However, this should work too:
sep: charset " ,.!?" ; and whatever else you want to split up words
b: [skip b | "ing"]
a: [b | to "ing" [sep to end | a]]
parse str a
though it's completely untested, and I agree that it's ugly :-)
>Actually, I think your suggestion is equivalent to the rule:
>b: [to "ing"]
No, as this rule wouldn't return true on the string "ringing".
>Also, recursion is not so good for very long strings:
>>> str: "ringing"
>== "ringing"
>>> parse str a
>== true ; OK
>>> insert str "- - - - -"
>== "ringing"
>>> parse str a
>== true ; still OK
>>> insert/dup str "- - - - -" 10
>== "- - - - -ringing"
>>> parse str a
>== true ; still OK
>>> insert/dup str "- - - - -" 100
>== {- - - - -- - - - -- - - - ...
>>> parse str a
>== false; stops working
>I expected a stack overflow error, but it just stopped working. Bug?
Strange. Don't know what happened, but you're right, recursion is really a
problem with REBOL as it offers only limited depth.
[...]
>>> parse "This is the straw that broke the camel's back" rule
>straw that broke the camel's back
>== true
>>> parse "I need some straw, and a camel" rule
>== false
>This is also very complex with PARSE, but trivial with regular
>expressions.
True. If Parse supported backtracking, it would just be a case of
parse str [any skip "straw" any non-punct "camel" to end]
>Ole wrote:
>>Converting "(string)*" and "(string)+", for example, into this:
>>
>>some-string: ["string" some-string | "string"]
>>any-string: ["string" any-string | none]
>>
>>should work, shouldn't it? But yes, I must admit, too, that 'any and 'some
>>ought to do some backtracking - in fact, I believed they did, so please
>>ignore the mail I sent a couple of days ago on how to easily build Parse
>>blocks from regular expressions ;-)
>>
>>Rebol Tech., isn't the lack of backtracking in 'any and 'some a bug?
>I'm not sure what the advantage of your suggestion would be over
>converting "(string)*" to [any "string"] and "(string)+" to [some
I actually had an idea with it, but I guess I need to think a little more
about it, as it doesn't seem quite so clear to me anymore ;-)
[...]
>The rule QUOTED-STR needs to be adjusted of course, depending on what
>you want to do, and there are always problems with how to deal with
>illegal strings (should you allow newlines in the middle or not etc).
>Still, parse rules make this kind of work easy, and backtracking can
>only be a complicating factor.
You're right on this one, i.e. that without backtracking, it might be easier
to understand exactly what's happening.
>>BTW, by building a DFA for a regular expression, you can get rid of
>>the backtracking. However, I don't know how fast a program can build
>>a DFA, it might not be that fast... but if you try to match one
>>regular expression to a lot of strings, it might be worth a go. Keep
>>in mind, though, that then you'll only be able to get a "matched" or
>>"didn't match" answer from your expression matching, it will probably
>>be very difficult to implement copying of the text inside
>>subexpressions etc.
>I've never read anything on how DFA's actually work, but it sounds real
>complicated. Search-text.r implements an NFA, of course, but even then I
>haven't figured out to copy text matching portions of the expression. If
>anyone would give me some hints, I'd be grateful.
Unfortunately I haven't ever tried to actually write a program which turns an
NFA into a DFA, but there are relatively simple algorithms to do so. I might
try to give it a go when I get the time, but unfortunately that's not now
(due to exams).
If you have an NFA with states s1, s2, ..., sn, you can build a DFA in which
the states are all possible subsets of {s1, s2, ..., sn}. The intuition is
this: When you feed some input stream to your NFA, it can be in a number of
states at once. Just select the state in your DFA that corresponds to the set
of states your NFA is in.
To decide which transitions you need between the states in your DFA given an
input symbol: For each element s in the set corresponding to the DFA state,
see which states you can go into from the NFA in state s. Take the union of
all the states you get, and you get another state in your DFA, and you've got
a transition between the two DFA states.
The starting state in your DFA is the state containing exactly the states you
can reach in your NFA given the empty string
[REBOL] More PWS Questions and Issue
Title: More PWS Questions and Issue I hate to be whipping a dead horse here, but am still having problems getting Rebol to run as a cgi script on personal web server?? I followed the instructions at http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html , and that was an adventure in itself. Any windows wizards out there willing to write a script or .bat file to make these registry settings easier and less scary for we mortals?? Anyway, after I made the changes, I tried to run a simple form with the cgi-get and cgi-post code from the howto.html...and got the following symptoms: 1) An instance of rebol opened up on my machine?? 2) The CGI script misbehaved and returned incomplete headers. The headers it did return were: and the rest of the screen was blank. I created a virtual directory named Rebol, and gave it execute priviledges, and my url for the form was http://localhost/rebol/cgi-get.r . Hope that someone can help me get this thing going...One writer suggest I run an different (Omni) web server...now this could be an interim option if I could run it on 8080 or something, but I need to continue to run PWS on 80HEEElp, Mark Woodward
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
Go REBOL, go! Piergiorgio MONGIOJ EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] Regular Expressions Re:(4)
Hi Petr, 6-Jan-2000 you wrote: [...] >> How about this: >> >> >> a: [skip a | "ing"] >> == [skip a | "ing"] >> >> parse "ringin" a >> == false >> >> parse "ringing" a >> == true >> >> It should do the job. So actually backtracking in Parse can be achieved by use >> of the "|" operator in Parse blocks. >What? | is simple OR or am I wrong? You will end up in recursion imho. That was the very point. >Try this: >a: [skip mark: (print mark) a | "ing"] >you will get following result: >ingin >ngin >gin >in >n >== false ...which was exactly what I wanted. >"ing" is never going to be considered imho, unless skip fails, and that's when? >When we reach end. Then it fails, as at the end, "ing" is not applicable. Because I wanted to match a string _ending_ with "ing". I guess we have just misunderstood each other? >How's that your second example works? Let's extend the rule: > a: [skip mark1: (print ["mark1: " mark1 index? mark1]) a | mark2: (print ["mark2: >" mark2 index? mark2]) "ing"] >mark1: inging 2 >mark1: nging 3 >mark1: ging 4 >mark1: ing 5 >mark1: ng 6 >mark1: g 7 >mark1: 8 >mark2: 8 >mark2: g 7 >mark2: ng 6 >mark2: ing 5 >== true >Hmm, strange, at mark1: 8 skip fails as we are at the end of the string, parse >tries to aply "ing" - not a succes, it then returns from recursion one level upon. >How's that 'skip fails here (mark2: 7)? In real - it doesn't, as the rule is: >[skip a | "ing"] >and we are just behind the skip, back from the nested 'a, which failed, so it >tries to aply "ing" >Whee ya, backtracking as a wine? :-) >I am just starting to learn some simple parse rules, so take my comments easy, if >wrong :-) I just don't see what the problem is. The examples above do exactly as I wanted. I used "|" as "a backtracker", since it appears to do this: First, call recursively on the left side of the "|". If the match succeeds, return success. If the first call didn't return success, call recursively on the right side of the "|" (starting from the same position in the input stream as for the call on the left side of the "|"). If the match succeeds, return success, otherwise return failure. This is effectively the same as backtracking. >See ya, >PS: I am somehow tired today to study and comment another examples, sorry :-) Me too, I still have to read quite a few pages (of _really_ boring statistics) before I can go to bed ;-) Kind regards, -- Ole Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Ignorance is bliss" (Cypher, The Matrix)
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Hi Carl, 6-Jan-2000 you wrote: >Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. >-Carl Well, then: Me too! Kind regards, -- Ole Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Ignorance is bliss" (Cypher, The Matrix)
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:(2)
Title: RE: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re: Hate to be slow, but I followed the directions (I think) to the T--. When I tried to run a simple form with the code from your howto page, I got the following: CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: Also, when I submitted the script, an instance of Rebol opened on my machine?? Any suggestions? Thanks Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server Re: Get message number 38514 from SELMA or read it at rebol.org: http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html Sterling > I have searched the mailing list for PWS and CGI and even Microsoft...but > have not found information on setting up Rebol to work (cgi) with Personal > Web Server? > > Can someone either tell me, or point to a message thread? > > Thanks in advance, > > Mark Woodward >
[REBOL] [REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4)
ooh look, a crowd of people doing the same thing. I can't resist... must imitate... can I join in too? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 8:22 AM Subject: [REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > Me too. > >
[REBOL] Evaluation Re:(10)
Hi, thanks, I forgot about it. But, see: Money: >> a: $100 == $100.00 >> poke a 2 3 == $3.00 >> a == $100.00 It seems immutable to me Date: >> a: 7/1/2000 == 7-Jan-2000 >> poke a 1 8 == 7-Jan-0008 >> a == 7-Jan-2000 Time: >> a: 21:21 == 21:21 >> type? a == time! >> poke a 1 22 == 22:21 >> a == 21:21 Tuple: >> a: 1.2.3 == 1.2.3 >> type? a == tuple! >> poke a 1 22 == 22.2.3 >> a == 1.2.3 So, I think, that although pokable, the values are immutable, which is not bad. Ladislav > >Hope this is helpful: > > >> HELP POKE > > Returns value after changing its data at the given index. (See manual) > Arguments: > value -- (series money date time object port tuple) > index -- (number logic) > data -- new value > > The list below lists a few of the above pokables as immutable. > > (Maybe the list could be broken into two?) -jeff > > > > any-type ; undecidable > any-function ; mutable > action ; mutable (change third ...) > function ; mutable (change first ...) > native ; mutable (change third ...) > op ; mutable (change third ...) > any-word ; undecidable > get-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > lit-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > refinement ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > set-word ; immutable > word ; mutable (protect/unprotect/set ...) > bitset ; immutable > char ; immutable - scalar > date ; immutable - scalar > error ; immutable > logic ; immutable - scalar > money ; immutable - scalar > none ; immutable - scalar > number ; immutable > integer ; immutable - scalar > decimal ; immutable - scalar > object ; mutable (through set-path ...) > port ; mutable (close ...) > series ; mutable (change ...) > any-block ; mutable (change ...) > block ; mutable - series (change ...) > list ; mutable - series (change ...) > lit-path ; mutable (change ...) > hash ; mutable - series (change ...) > paren ; mutable - series (change ...) > path ; mutable - series (change ...) > set-path ; mutable (change ...) > any-string ; mutable (change ...) > binary ; mutable - series (change ...) > email ; mutable - series (change ...) > file ; mutable - series (change ...) > issue ; mutable - series (change ...) > string ; mutable - series (change ...) > tag ; mutable - series (change ...) > url ; mutable - series (change ...) > symbol ; immutable > time ; immutable - scalar > tuple ; immutable - scalar > unset ; immutable > > > > > > >
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL...
Me too. Thanks, Aleksandar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 7:29 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) >Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > >-Carl > > >At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: >>Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there >>be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... >>ME TOO. >> >>Elliott >> >>On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> I also want to be part of the team >> >> > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those of you who > want to test drive it. >> >
[REBOL] AW: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL...
Me too! thanks, ulrich
[REBOL] snmp with rebol
I would like to write a few programs in snmp dealing with network managment. For instance getting stats from routers, switches, etc. However, I am new to Rebol and I have downloaded the help files, faq, manual, etc and I would like to know if anyone has attempted to do this already. I looked through the scripts, but didn't find anything aplicable at www.rebol.com or www.rebol.org. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Faron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Me too !! (Win95 version)
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
carl wrote: >Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will >send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. In that case; please do fling me an Amiga version, once available. :) (You might as well send it to all list subscribers by the looks of it...;) /Jonny Johansson
[REBOL] How to close a TCP/IP connection? Re:(3)
Carlos, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Yep we do speak Portuguese! > > Unfortunately I know nothing about the guy and the company you mentioned. > > You know, Brazil is a very large country and Amazonas is a state 6.000 km > far from the place I live. Wow, it is huge (even in km ;-). There is much of the world I haven't seen. I bet it is beautiful down there. > We that live at southern region of our country know very little about people > at north and northeast regions. I'sorry to say but only when news come from > tv is when we remember those places exist :-( > > If you really need to get news from this company or it's president I can try > to search it for you. It was presumptuous of me to think of Brazil as a monolithic culture like the US. Don't spend too much time. Just said something because of your .br = Brazil. He seemed about 35-40 years old. His generals of the revolution are now his company officers. He said they had all been in jail together, but now he is very successful financially. > By the way what kind of revolution was this guy in? Was political, now its technical ;-) > Carlos Sorry about bandwidth usage, Steve Shireman
[REBOL] Fw: Developer's Host: Is there any?
John Childers, CEO Golden Gate Graphics web site: http://personal.idcomm.com/childers/ From: Larry Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John W. Childers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cc: The Denver Area "6502 Group") >John, > >My experience is that the typical ISP is not very helpful with the kind of >programming tasks that you want to do. Their typical user is an ordinary >citizen who just wants a simple web page to post his/her family pictures. >To get the kind of access you want, you have to higher level of service >provider. > >I have found the kind of service you want in two different places. The >first is a free public access ISP called NYX. NYX is a non-profit which >provide internet and UNIX access free of charge. They are supported by >donations, so if you feel guilty, you can make a periodic donation. They >provide complete UNIX shell access and you can write CGI scripts and C >programs to your hearts content. They do provide some web hosting >services, but it is not the kind of place you want to use for a commercial >site. It is however, a great place to experiement with scripts and >programs etc. The web address is: http://www.nyx.net > >The second kind of place is a full service web hosting company. These >companies typically don't provide dialup service, so you have to telnet or >ftp in from another service. The one I am using is called Interactive >Online. They provide everything you need including your own CGI directory, >annonymous FTP directory and access to the log files. They also have a >complete library of CGI scripts and of course you can write your own. >The web address is: http://www.interactiveonline.net > >I hope the information is useful. If you have any questions, feel free to >write. > >Larry Fish > > >
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
I'd love to try the beta REBOL/View too, please. Thanks, Eric
[REBOL] Evaluation Re:(9)
Hope this is helpful: >> HELP POKE Returns value after changing its data at the given index. (See manual) Arguments: value -- (series money date time object port tuple) index -- (number logic) data -- new value The list below lists a few of the above pokables as immutable. (Maybe the list could be broken into two?) -jeff any-type ; undecidable any-function ; mutable action ; mutable (change third ...) function ; mutable (change first ...) native ; mutable (change third ...) op ; mutable (change third ...) any-word ; undecidable get-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) lit-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) refinement ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) set-word ; immutable word ; mutable (protect/unprotect/set ...) bitset ; immutable char ; immutable - scalar date ; immutable - scalar error ; immutable logic ; immutable - scalar money ; immutable - scalar none ; immutable - scalar number ; immutable integer ; immutable - scalar decimal ; immutable - scalar object ; mutable (through set-path ...) port ; mutable (close ...) series ; mutable (change ...) any-block ; mutable (change ...) block ; mutable - series (change ...) list ; mutable - series (change ...) lit-path ; mutable (change ...) hash ; mutable - series (change ...) paren ; mutable - series (change ...) path ; mutable - series (change ...) set-path ; mutable (change ...) any-string ; mutable (change ...) binary ; mutable - series (change ...) email ; mutable - series (change ...) file ; mutable - series (change ...) issue ; mutable - series (change ...) string ; mutable - series (change ...) tag ; mutable - series (change ...) url ; mutable - series (change ...) symbol ; immutable time ; immutable - scalar tuple ; immutable - scalar unset ; immutable
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(8)
Well, ME TOO :) Jano > I strongly agree that this wasn't the best way to do this, but, um, me, too! > > btw, me too > Me too! Asa long as this isn't automatically picking up the addresses, > please can you use my home email rather than this one? > > > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we > will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. >> > > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will > there > > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > > >ME TOO. > > > > > My > > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > > >>> of you who > > want to test drive it.
[REBOL] HTML off Re:
Hi Carlos Yup. Plain text now. Thanks Larry - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 8:27 AM Subject: [REBOL] HTML off > Hi guys, I turned off HTML in Outlook Preferences. > > Is that alright now? > > Carlos >
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(7)
Moi aussi, Watakushi mo...me too!
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(7)
I strongly agree that this wasn't the best way to do this, but, um, me, too! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 2:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6) rebols, Given the popularity of the beta announcement for REBOL/View, would it not be more sensible to make it available for download on www.rebol.com. btw, me too thanks, john >-- Me too! Asa long as this isn't automatically picking up the addresses, please can you use my home email rather than this one? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:21 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > > >
[REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(6)
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 06-Gen-00, you wrote: l> error value. Moreover, Bind doesn't change words, it simply l> creates new words. That means, that Bind is not a good example l> of a function modifying words. Indeed: >> a: 'b == b >> b's-context: use [b] [b: 1 'b] == b >> bind a b's-context == b >> get a ** Script Error: b has no value. ** Where: get a Regards, Gabriele. -- o) .-^-. (--o | Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila | | GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ | o) `-v-' (--o
[REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(4)
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 06-Gen-00, you wrote: l> I am not sure about that. If Disarm doesn't change the error l> state, then error is immutable. I think it doesn't, but let's try: >> disarm error: make error! "This is an error" >> error ** User Error: This is an error. ** Where: disarm error: make error! "This is an error" Regards, Gabriele. -- o) .-^-. (--o | Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila | | GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ | o) `-v-' (--o
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Hi Carl Me too. I would love to try the new REBOL/View. Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 10:21 PM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > >
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Me too, please. Bernie Schneider Systems Analyst CIBER, Inc. 303-224-4159 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Carl wrote: > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you >REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. Okay, I'll flood the list too... Me Too please Carl! Cheers, Kev Kevin McKinnon, Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunshine Communications http://www.sunshinecable.com **NOTE NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS** PGP Public Key: http://www.dockmaster.net/pgp.html PGP 6.0 www.pgp.com
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
In that case please accept my "Me Too!" notice. Paul >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) >Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:21:54 -0800 > >Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will >send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > >-Carl > > >At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will >there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > > __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[REBOL] Personal Web Server Re:
I tried for several days to get REBOL to work with PWS and never did succeed. Save yourself the grief and go to OMNI HTTPd. It's free and behaves quite well with REBOL. You can get it at: http://www.omnicron.ab.ca Paul >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [REBOL] Personal Web Server >Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:55:32 -0600 > >I have searched the mailing list for PWS and CGI and even Microsoft...but >have not found information on setting up Rebol to work (cgi) with Personal >Web Server? > >Can someone either tell me, or point to a message thread? > >Thanks in advance, > >Mark Woodward __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4)
Well just to be sure I'll say ME TOO as well. TIA Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 1:25 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) : : : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : : > Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there : > be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... : > ME TOO. : > : : Hey, one copy to Czech Republic, please :-) : : -pekr- : : > : > Elliott : > : > On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : > : > > Hi: : > > : > > I also want to be part of the team : > : > >>> My : > >>> plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those : > >> of you who : > >>> want to test drive it. : :
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Of course, me too! :) (Is this a way of seeing who's reading the list? heheh) Russ --- At 10:21 PM 1/6/2000 -0800, you wrote: >Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > >-Carl
[REBOL] HTML off
Hi guys, I turned off HTML in Outlook Preferences. Is that alright now? Carlos
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
>Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will >send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. I defenetly want this too. :) Thanks! / John
[REBOL] Starting Up Re:
One good progression would be: In a Nutshell http://www.rebol.com/nutshell.html Setup http://www.rebol.com/setup.html In Ten Steps http://www.rebol.com/rebolsteps.html Howtos http://www.rebol.com/howto.html (do some test projects, and then) Users Guide http://www.rebol.com/users.html There's also a beta guide, but I think you might be better starting with the first one. Dictionary http://www.rebol.com/dictionary.html *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 1/7/2000 at 9:31 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a newbie with Rebol. It looks interesting, but I'm just slightly overwhelmed. Could somebody point me to a starting point - some kind of "How to" document? Dan Arico
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
ME TOO, PLEASE At 02:21 a.m. 07/01/00 , you wrote: Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. -Carl At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... >ME TOO. > >Elliott > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I also want to be part of the team > > My plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those >>> of you who want to test drive it. > -- Luis Marzulli e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caracas, VENEZUELA -- Earn money when you or your friends are on the Web click --> http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=BXX890
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
On 03-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Count me in! -- ---===///||| Donald Dalley |||\\\===--- The World of AmiBroker Support http://webhome.idirect.com/~ddalley Member: ICOA and Team AMIGA
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
I would like to be on the Rebol/View tester list. I can't wait for Rebol/Command either. Greg Piney Standard and Poor's Web Engineering
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(9)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I want Rebol/View Beta as well . . . And an update on /Command would be cool also . .. Thanks. Dale Dale McCrory Web Developer StudioNorth North Chicago, IL
[REBOL] Rebol as MTA
Hello: I am new to Rebol, which I now use to automate a mailing list for a non-profit support group. I also use a free ISP as a backup service when my main one goes down; however, that backup service does not provide an SMTP server. Can Rebol be used as a mail transfer agent for small volume, occasional e-mails? I see that SMTP is build into Rebol, but there is no example posted on the Rebol site on how to use it. Joe.
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Please add me to the list to get a copy of Rebol/View At 12:51 PM 01/07/2000 +0100, you wrote: >I won't rebuff it, but I am waiting for Rebol/Command. > >regards >AR > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we >>will send you >> REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > >> -Carl > > > >-- >Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net > >
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Umm... me too? (I normally really dislike these type of posts, but if it will get me software, what the hey.) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 1:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > > > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, > and we will > send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl >
[REBOL] Starting Up
I'm a newbie with Rebol. It looks interesting, but I'm just slightly overwhelmed. Could somebody point me to a starting point - some kind of "How to" document? Dan Arico
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
At 05:02 PM 1/2/2000 -0800, you wrote: Yes count me in. I am definitely part of the revolution. Mike Yaunish email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > > be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > > ME TOO. > > > > Hey, one copy to Czech Republic, please :-) Hey, Petr. Let me fix your order, please: TWO copies to Czech Republic, please :-)) Jan
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Well, me, too me, too. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 1:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > > > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, > and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or > will there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > > >
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(2)
I'd love to get first peek at the new version
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
yes please, thanks!
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:
I'm very interested, as well! Thanks to Carl and the gang for all the hard work! -jn-
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(8)
oh yeh
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(7)
next one please...
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4)
I won't rebuff it, but I am waiting for Rebol/Command. regards AR [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we >will send you > REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > -Carl -- Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
ahem... -- -t
[REBOL] REBOL Hosting Environment Re:
> Is there anything (serious responses only please) that people would be interested in as part of the hosting service. FrontPage. Support for Netscape Gold/Composer, and Trellix would also be nice. An Open Source project to develop REBOL-based Web management tools (a la Tripod.com and Dmoz.org) would be fun. (Which tools could eventually make FrontPage et al obsolete, or at least redundant.) -Ted. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 1/6/2000 at 8:08 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am working on setting up a secure and fast enironment for offering REBOL virtual hosting for those who would be interested. We plan on offerring access to REBOL via basic CGI access and offering access to use the Apache module once its fully released. Is there anything (serious responses only please) that people wouldbe interested in as part of the hosting service. This will be full on virtual hosting including domain names, shell accounts, email, etc. Please respond via private email. Thanks Respond to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] Developer's Host: Is there any? Re:
>any inexpensive hosting service My host is very CGI and developer friendly, inexpensive and responsive. The machines are located near Chicago Nap, MAE East and MAE West. http://www.clss.com/hostdetails.htm You could contact them directly, or I could help get you set up as a reseller. It runs about $35/month, unlimited traffic, et cetera. I also think we could run REBOL scripts from some of the free servers, like Tripod. Anyone tried this yet? I just need to write a quick script to test what platform my test account is on (wxxi_org.tripod.com). For the least cost, sometimes a dial-up ISP will give you some free Web space, complete with a CGI-BIN. (For REBOL, all you need is an executable directory and FTP, and you're in business.) You could then use a forwarding service like NameSecure.com (about $35/year ) to keep your top-level domain in use. -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com. *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***On 1/6/2000 at 5:08 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear REBOL Developers, I am writing to you all because you are software developers. I am reactivating my programmer days from years back and getting into scripting for the Internet. I have been evaluating languages by going through the tutors and have decided for sure I'll use REBOL (pronounced "rebel" as in "Rebel yell") as much as possible. However, I've already run into a snag: My hosting service won't co-operate: it allows absolutely no CGI for user-written scripts. I'm told "They crash the server " Do any of you know a Denver Colorado area ISP/Hosting service (or any inexpensive hosting service)that caters to developers? After all, we're the future of the "information highway," so one might think we could develop our own scripts or applets in a user-friendly environment; and without the expense of having to establish our own hosting environment. John Childers, CEOGolden Gate Graphics web site: http://personal.idcomm.com/childers/ "Your Printed Circuit Layout Specialists"Phone: 303.762.8868Fax: 303.797.6921
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
rebols, Given the popularity of the beta announcement for REBOL/View, would it not be more sensible to make it available for download on www.rebol.com. btw, me too thanks, john >-- Me too! Asa long as this isn't automatically picking up the addresses, please can you use my home email rather than this one? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:21 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > > >
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
> Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will > send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. and me... (this is going to be a long thread) -- Pat Ward - Versation Corp. - phone 847.506.9095 digital audio and digital media services 425 N. Douglas Avenue | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arlington Heights IL 60004-6122 | http://versation.net/
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Me too! Asa long as this isn't automatically picking up the addresses, please can you use my home email rather than this one? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:21 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > -Carl > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > >ME TOO. > > > >Elliott > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > My > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > >>> of you who > want to test drive it. > > > >
[REBOL] Evaluation Re:(8)
Correction #2: (thx Eric, Gabriele, Joel) > any-type ; undecidable > any-function ; mutable > action ; mutable (change third ...) > function ; mutable (change first ...) > native ; mutable (change third ...) > op ; mutable (change third ...) > any-word ; undecidable > get-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > lit-word ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > refinement ; immutable - (an immutable ref. to a mutable word?) > set-word ; immutable > word ; mutable (protect/unprotect/set ...) > bitset ; immutable > char ; immutable - scalar > date ; immutable - scalar > error ; immutable > logic ; immutable - scalar > money ; immutable - scalar > none ; immutable - scalar > number ; immutable > integer ; immutable - scalar > decimal ; immutable - scalar > object ; mutable (through set-path ...) > port ; mutable (close ...) > series ; mutable (change ...) > any-block ; mutable (change ...) > block ; mutable - series (change ...) > list ; mutable - series (change ...) > lit-path ; mutable (change ...) > hash ; mutable - series (change ...) > paren ; mutable - series (change ...) > path ; mutable - series (change ...) > set-path ; mutable (change ...) > any-string ; mutable (change ...) > binary ; mutable - series (change ...) > email ; mutable - series (change ...) > file ; mutable - series (change ...) > issue ; mutable - series (change ...) > string ; mutable - series (change ...) > tag ; mutable - series (change ...) > url ; mutable - series (change ...) > symbol ; immutable > time ; immutable - scalar > tuple ; immutable - scalar > unset ; immutable
[REBOL] Re: Printing Re:(3)
On 07-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> There is quite a good Acrobat reader on Amiga called Apdf. > > No, it's a PDF reader, not "Acrobat". Apdf is still buggy, I've had it > lock up or crash several times. Well, most people use the term "Acrobat files" as a colloquialism for "PDF files". What version do you have? Mine is V 1.3, 68020 FPU version with decryption. I use it just about every day with no crashes. I am not saying it's as good as Adobe's original reader, and you need to set the fonts up carefully if you want to read off screen, but the point is that the format is usable on Amiga. There is no simple solution to printing (or screen displays) that will work on all platforms, but PDF or PostScript output might do for a start. Unless Carl wants to employ several programmers full time writing printer drivers? Regards -- Don Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there > > be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > > ME TOO. > > me too!...;^) > Me too. > > > > Elliott > > > > On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > I also want to be part of the team > > > > > > >>> My > > >>> plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > > >> of you who > > >>> want to test drive it. > > > > > > --Alan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- S pozdravem Michal Kracik
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4)
Me too.
[REBOL] [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
I would like to be a beta tester too! Brgds /Micael -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Skickat: den 7 januari 2000 07:22 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Amne: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. -Carl At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... >ME TOO. > >Elliott > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I also want to be part of the team > > My plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those >>> of you who want to test drive it. >
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(6)
Count me in, too. Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 12:16 AM Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5) > OK. me too. > > I think there would be very few of us here who wouldn't want to give a try. > ;-) > Also what's the status with REBOL/Command? > > Cheers, > > Allen K > > > Thanks Carl for helping us make our computers useful tools again. > > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 4:21 PM > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) > > > > Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we > will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. > > > > -Carl > > > > > > At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: > > >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will > there > > >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... > > >ME TOO. > > > > > >Elliott > > > > > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> Hi: > > >> > > >> I also want to be part of the team > > > > > > > > My > > plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those > > >>> of you who > > want to test drive it. > > > > > > > >
[REBOL] Re: how to close the connection after sendind Re:(2)
Hello, On 05-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 05-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Doubt you can do it directly from REBOL. But you could configure your >> Windows DUN under MODEM/CONFIGURE to "disconnect if idle more than 'x' >> minutes" to drop the connection for you after a while. That might be >> sufficient to accomplish what you desire. > > If REBOL can't do it, there's a sure-fire way of taking any modem off-line > - power the modem down. ;^) OK, try powering down an internal Winmodem in your PC. :) I think he possibly meant (assuming the auto connect of the M$ TCP stack) for Rebol to tell the stack to disconnect. Carlos, this might be in one of the other Rebol packages (like command?) since it would be platform specific. > Carlos: would you mind turning off HTML in your messages, please? Yes please, and the other guys too (well, at least one other). Elliott
[REBOL] Re: Printing Re:(3)
Hello, On 06-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 06-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Non-trivial printing seems like a tough cross-platform challenge, >>> since I'm sure the models are very different. The other workaround >>> that's been discussed is using PDF the same way, write to a PDF >>> format and let Acrobat finish the job. But I don't think anyone's >>> implemented that yet. >> >> Just like nobody has implemented Acrobat on the Amiga. Anything like >> this for PDAs or other platforms (other than Windows, Mac and maybe >> Linux)? > > There is quite a good Acrobat reader on Amiga called Apdf. No, it's a PDF reader, not "Acrobat". Apdf is still buggy, I've had it lock up or crash several times. > There are fifty computer platforms And only one or two seem to be well supported. > and around a thousand models of printer > out there. A particular printer model will want to see the same code > regardless of which computer it is plugged into. Probably only Windows has > drivers for all the available printers. Trying to write drivers without > help from the manufacturers is an impossible task - and the manufacturers > will _not_ help. And some manufacturers (seem to) try to prevent other drivers from being written by making Winprinters (like Windows is the only OS out there). Elliott
[REBOL] Re: Printing Re:(4)
Hello, On 05-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Kevin, > >> You can determine the OS by looking at 'fourth system/version >> >> Currently: >> 1=Amiga, 2=Mac, 3=Win32, 4=Linux, 5=BeOS, 6-9=Flavours of BSD, >> 10=Solaris, 11=SGI, 12=HP/UX, 15=WinCE, 17=AIX, 19=SCO Unix, 22=QNX RTOS > > Oh, good catch. I wonder if there is any significance in the order? ;) I like to think so since Carl was the father of AmigaOS. Elliott
[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(5)
Me too! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 1:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(4) Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it. -Carl At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote: >Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there >be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former... >ME TOO. > >Elliott > >On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I also want to be part of the team > > My plan is to release a beta by mid-January to those >>> of you who want to test drive it. >
