Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
On 2011-10-11, Curt Arnold wrote: both bin/2.0/release/log4net.dll and bin/3.5/release/log4net.dll describe themselves as Apache log4net for the .NET Framework 2.0. Everybody else has the expected application description. Those two DLLs are the same file as there currently is no difference between the 2.0 and 3.5 builds. Maybe I shouldn't have created the 3.5 version at all. log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm uses a page header reading log4net SDK Documentation ... that would be better as Apache log4net SDK Documentation. Will fix that once I figure out how to do it with NDoc. doc/index.html refers to log4j and not Apache log4j. It uses Apache log4net three times before using the shorter version, I think that's OK. doc/index.html refers to the .NET runtime. The Microsoft .NET trademark guidelines are at http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Net.aspx. At least we should have a Microsoft(r) .NET at the first menion. Will fix that - for the site as well. This likely affects other pages as well. newzip.zip: log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm always displayed Navigation to the webpage was cancelled for any content. Seems totally broken. You probably need to unblock the .chm. I wonder why you didn't have to do that for the oldkey archive. I'm thinking it would be better to scuttle RC1 and try again, but I won't force the issue. 1.2.11 is through. I expect us to follow this up with 1.2.12 pretty soon as there still are enough issues to address and I'm sure new issues with Client Profile and .NET 4.0 builds will arise now that they become available. Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-10-11, Curt Arnold wrote: both bin/2.0/release/log4net.dll and bin/3.5/release/log4net.dll describe themselves as Apache log4net for the .NET Framework 2.0. Everybody else has the expected application description. Those two DLLs are the same file as there currently is no difference between the 2.0 and 3.5 builds. Maybe I shouldn't have created the 3.5 version at all. I believe they were not binary identical, but that could have been timestamps or other insignificant differences. log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm uses a page header reading log4net SDK Documentation ... that would be better as Apache log4net SDK Documentation. Will fix that once I figure out how to do it with NDoc. doc/index.html refers to log4j and not Apache log4j. It uses Apache log4net three times before using the shorter version, I think that's OK. It does describe log4net as Apache log4net appropriately but it does not describe log4j as Apache log4j. doc/index.html refers to the .NET runtime. The Microsoft .NET trademark guidelines are at http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Net.aspx. At least we should have a Microsoft(r) .NET at the first menion. Will fix that - for the site as well. This likely affects other pages as well. I think the guidelines might have become looser recently. I think at one time you would have to describe it as for the Common Language Runtime and could not refer to the Microsoft(r) .NET Framework. newzip.zip: log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm always displayed Navigation to the webpage was cancelled for any content. Seems totally broken. You probably need to unblock the .chm. I wonder why you didn't have to do that for the oldkey archive. Funny things happen late at night. I'm thinking it would be better to scuttle RC1 and try again, but I won't force the issue. 1.2.11 is through. I expect us to follow this up with 1.2.12 pretty soon as there still are enough issues to address and I'm sure new issues with Client Profile and .NET 4.0 builds will arise now that they become available. Frequent releases what a concept. Thanks for all the work to get 1.2.11 out the door.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
On 2011-10-12, Curt Arnold wrote: On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-10-11, Curt Arnold wrote: both bin/2.0/release/log4net.dll and bin/3.5/release/log4net.dll describe themselves as Apache log4net for the .NET Framework 2.0. Everybody else has the expected application description. Those two DLLs are the same file as there currently is no difference between the 2.0 and 3.5 builds. Maybe I shouldn't have created the 3.5 version at all. I believe they were not binary identical, but that could have been timestamps or other insignificant differences. They have been compiled separately so yes, there will be differences in timestamps. doc/index.html refers to log4j and not Apache log4j. It uses Apache log4net three times before using the shorter version, I think that's OK. It does describe log4net as Apache log4net appropriately but it does not describe log4j as Apache log4j. I somehow missed you were talking about log4*j* - will fix that in trunk and update the site later today. doc/index.html refers to the .NET runtime. The Microsoft .NET trademark guidelines are at http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Net.aspx. At least we should have a Microsoft(r) .NET at the first menion. Will fix that - for the site as well. This likely affects other pages as well. I think the guidelines might have become looser recently. I think at one time you would have to describe it as for the Common Language Runtime and could not refer to the Microsoft(r) .NET Framework. The site I've just deployed should be OK - not visible, yet. Frequent releases what a concept. 8-) No promises, though. Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 [X] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... I checked everything I said, but did not manage to get the .NET beast running fully. I will try to set up a unit testing environment for the next release (no promises :-)). Anyway, I trust you on coding level, so please go ahead and release this package. Cheers! Christian Thanks! Stefan -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
Observations: GPG keys check out comparing the source zip with the SVN tag, the following items are not in the source zip: doap_log4net.rdf (DOAP file placed here for convenience) src/site/fml (empty directory) src/site/resources/js (empty directory) tests/lib/prerequisites.txt (note on prerequisites for running tests, likely dated now). None of the files would seem to interfere with building the library from the source distribution. Many if not all of the source files do not use CRLF line feeds as would be expected for a predominantly Windows oriented library. Looks like the .zip was built on a Unixy box. LICENSE and NOTICE appear fine other than displaying funny unless the application understands Unix line feeds. I'll +1 the log4net-src.zip, but would not object if anyone wants to pull it and try again. I'm moving on to check the binaries.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
More observations: oldkey.zip LICENSE and NOTICE are present, but with Unix style linefeeds. both bin/2.0/release/log4net.dll and bin/3.5/release/log4net.dll describe themselves as Apache log4net for the .NET Framework 2.0. Everybody else has the expected application description. log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm uses a page header reading log4net SDK Documentation ... that would be better as Apache log4net SDK Documentation. Most text files use Unix style line feeds. doc/index.html refers to log4j and not Apache log4j. doc/index.html refers to the .NET runtime. The Microsoft .NET trademark guidelines are at http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Net.aspx. At least we should have a Microsoft(r) .NET at the first menion. newzip.zip: log4net-sdk-net-4.0.chm always displayed Navigation to the webpage was cancelled for any content. Seems totally broken. Other issues mentioned with oldkey.zip. I'm thinking it would be better to scuttle RC1 and try again, but I won't force the issue.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
+1 I've wandered through the website and checked the rat report, I don't have time to pull down the sources and try to build myself. Great work Stefa. Scott On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-10-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 [X] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... +1 Stefan
[VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 [X] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... +1 --Original Message-- From: Stefan Bodewig To: Log4NET Dev Cc: gene...@logging.apache.org ReplyTo: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1 Sent: Oct 7, 2011 7:54 AM On 2011-10-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 [X] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... +1 Stefan Enviado desde BB
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
+1
