Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
On 2013-09-10, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > +1 > I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run > the tests (without lot of efforts :-)). Thanks :-) > Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below. > Unapproved licenses: > log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme > log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt both are simple readmes and are likely to get excluded from the report - I'll look into it post-release. Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
+1 I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run the tests (without lot of efforts :-)). Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below. Unapproved licenses: log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt I do not consider this a blocker, but you may want to run the report manually again or update the plugin. Cheers! Christian Am 09.09.13 15:11, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > Hi all, > > after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release. > > log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > (revision 2850) > > Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html > > I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. > > The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1 > (revision 1520872) > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ > > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html > > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep > 2013 > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thanks! > > Stefan
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 06:08 >An: Log4NET Dev >Cc: gene...@logging.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1 > >I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release. > >On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote: > >>A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC >>on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the >>entire vertical space: >>Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu? > >Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have >enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-) True ;-)
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release. On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote: >A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC >on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the >entire vertical space: >Maybe it's just a chrome thing on ubuntu? Looks fine in Firefox - and even if it didn't, I'm not sure we'd have enough influence on the generated HTML anyway :-) Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote: > I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first > glance I found these issues on the web page: > * the download page is broken I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run CGIs from my homedir. > * the SDK reference is broken Ah, good catch, fixed. > * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this > intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those > frameworks have to be built from source? I've stated it in the release notes where I did the same when we dropped CF 1.0 in 1.2.11 (BTW, there is a build for .NET 1.0). Anyway, we can fix the site whenever we feel like it, independent of any release. Cheers Stefan
AW: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Yay, you found the time! I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first glance I found these issues on the web page: * the download page is broken * the SDK reference is broken * Supported Frameworks still lists Compact Framework and .NET 1.0, is this intended? Maybe we should list in Framework specific notes that those frameworks have to be built from source? Cheers >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >Gesendet: Montag, 9. September 2013 15:11 >An: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; gene...@logging.apache.org >Betreff: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1 > >Hi all, > >after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release. > >log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > (revision 2850) > >Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release- >notes.html > >I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. > >The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1 > (revision 1520872) > >Site: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ > >RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html > >Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep >2013 > >[ ] +1 Release these artifacts >[ ] +0 OK, but... >[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >[ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >Thanks! > >Stefan
[VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Hi all, after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release. log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net (revision 2850) Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. The tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1 (revision 1520872) Site: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ RAT Report: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep 2013 [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thanks! Stefan
