Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread Lusercop
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:37:45PM +0100, Nigel Rantor wrote:
 You may all get your rocks ready for this one, I expect a stoning from 
 the zealots. (and Lusercop because he can't resist a good stoning)

:-) I don't tend to reply to buffy threads, not particularly agreeing with
the apparent general trend towards liking it. As my current housemate once
said in answer to my so what is all the fuss about BtVS and he replied
I think the fuss is about two things I've never seen The Prisoner,
though I'd like to, from the things I've heard about it.

At the moment, though, I'm just too shattered to even try and lift the stone,
let alone aiming it and throwing it. ;-)

-- 
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 2002



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Twin Peaks winds me up. I remember being in school when it was on, and the 
 kind of people who were into it suffered from two other co-morbidities:
 
 1. They liked Marillion


They liked Twin Peaks and Marillion? They clearly are people of 
exceptionally good taste, imagination and intellect.

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.org.uk/~gem/
   jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn://[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread Tim Sweetman
Curiously, the original article 
(http://www.reason.com/0308/cr.vp.why.shtml) explains some of why I'm 
uneasy about buffy: the extent to which it carries Standardized American 
Memes (good and bad). American tolerance/demand for Moral Closure seems 
to be very high, cf. all those films where the guy who has been tempted 
by the dark side dies heroically, etc, etc, etc ... I'll stop here, 
before this ends up knee-deep in sex, religion, politics, or all three.

[Pauses on bridge]
[tempts ducks over with stale bread]
[fattens ducks]
[feeds ducks to trolls]
WHAT?!
WTF do you mean, best TV series ever?
FFS, if I mailed the list and asked what the best way was to sort 
alphanumerics, find fish, harvest raspberries, or add one, there would 
be about fifteen different recommendations, two of which would involve 
Befunge. By the same toucan, best TV series is not a sensible thing to 
look for. And that's quite apart from being imprisoned in the Cult Zone 
of Prisoner, Buffy, Dr$Who, Twin Peaks, etc

Still, at least it's not Eastenders.	

/rant

ti'




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread Robin Berjon
Tim Sweetman wrote:
be about fifteen different recommendations, two of which would involve 
Befunge. By the same toucan, best TV series is not a sensible thing to 
Befunge the Vampire Slayer. That's the best TV series. Ever.

--
Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Scientist, Expway  http://expway.com/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread Gareth Morris
T'was written...

WTF do you mean, best TV series ever?

Busty was great but what about the Avengers???

Gaz

_
Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-05 Thread David H. Adler
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:29:12AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
 * Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  Twin Peaks winds me up. I remember being in school when it was on, and the 
  kind of people who were into it suffered from two other co-morbidities:
  
  1. They liked Marillion
 
 
 They liked Twin Peaks and Marillion? They clearly are people of 
 exceptionally good taste, imagination and intellect.

Uh... we've learned to ignore grep, right?  :-)

dha, who has actually seen Marillion live, but can't remember for whom
they were opening...

-- 
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
A picture is worth
several hundred thousand words...
in the right haiku  - Damian Conway



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-04 Thread Philip Newton
On 3 Sep 2003 at 17:28, Jonathan Peterson wrote:

 Twin Peaks winds me up. I remember being in school when it was on, and the 
 kind of people who were into it suffered from two other co-morbidities:
 
 1. They liked Marillion
 2. They tried to understand R.E.M. lyrics

I never watched it but I remember that when I was in school (that would 
be around 1990, I think), the history teacher would occasionally 
threaten to give away what happened in a future Twin Peaks episode if 
people weren't attentive (when Germany was in the middle of the series 
but he had seen it all in Scotland, or something).

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-04 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Nigel Rantor wrote:
  Hopefully Lynch hasn't completely given away the
  idea of coming back to TV...
 
 And Wild Palms was forgettable. Well, I saw it and now it is forgotten. 

I've seen it. I some point I was looking at the original comic books
(never found them). It's true that the first episodes have some lynchean
colour, (not mentioning the presence of Robert Loggia), but Lynch didn't
participate in them, did he ?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106175/



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-04 Thread Nigel Rantor
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
I've seen it. I some point I was looking at the original comic books
(never found them). It's true that the first episodes have some lynchean
colour, (not mentioning the presence of Robert Loggia), but Lynch didn't
participate in them, did he ?
Before I saw it I just got this weird vibe through the jungle that it 
was meant to be 'lynchean', and that ollie stone was directing it.

To be honest, I think maybe they we're trying to imbue some of Twin 
Peaks' surreality but then again I only saw the series, I didn't read WP 
before hand so I'm not sure what the original they were working with was 
like.

I don't beleive lynch participated, at least (as you point out on imdb) 
he isn't actually credited. Who knows what goes on though, these guys 
must get together and hack code (figurativley) with one another.

Anyway, I remember being really excited when I heard about it, perhaps 
if I had my anti-hype muffs back then I wouldn't have been so disappointed.

I think part of the problem was also that I missed a couple (because I 
didn't care about the story/characters anymore) and that just made it 
awful to follow.

Actually, maybe I'll see if anyone has it and just watch it 
back-to-back...hmm...

  N

p.s. Wow, I can ramble, can't I?




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-04 Thread Phil Lanch
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:55:14PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
 Frankly, I think comparing those shows to buffy is misguided.  It's sort
 of like trying to compare 8 1/2 to the Philadelphia Story.  Ok, maybe
 not quite *that* extreme.

well, i'd prefer to watch Hepburn  Grant in _Bringing Up Baby_; and i
think Stewart is better when he's not *just* being nice (it's more
interesting if there are complications) - especially in _The Man from
Laramie_, also _Vertigo_.  whereas 8½ is clearly Fellini's best film.
so 8½ is better.

OTOH, i've never seen more than a minute or 2 of Buffy, so i can't
really compare it to anything.

-- 
Phil Lanch0xD78D598DA6635CF32AB24593C98994B7D95B33E3
   (i even know the passphrase: http://www.subtle.clara.co.uk/rephrase )

If I knew then what I know now, I would have said 'I don't recall'.



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-04 Thread David H. Adler
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:44:02PM +0100, Phil Lanch wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:55:14PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
  Frankly, I think comparing those shows to buffy is misguided.  It's sort
  of like trying to compare 8 1/2 to the Philadelphia Story.  Ok, maybe
  not quite *that* extreme.
 
 well, i'd prefer to watch Hepburn  Grant in _Bringing Up Baby_; and i
 think Stewart is better when he's not *just* being nice (it's more
 interesting if there are complications) - especially in _The Man from
 Laramie_, also _Vertigo_.  whereas 8½ is clearly Fellini's best film.
 so 8½ is better.

Of course, by that reasoning, Night of the Ghouls is better, as it's Ed
Wood's best film. :-)

I'll admit to Bringing Up Baby being better than Philadelphia Story, but
I still think there's a disconnect there, as they're very different
films, albeit less so than my original comparison.

In any case, my point was that there are things that are sufficiently
different that to call one better than the other isn't necessarily a
reasonable thing.  I'm quite sure that a whole lot of people do *not*
think think 8 1/2 is good at all.  Although they would be *wrong* :-),
we're walking through the valley of personal preference more than
anything else at that point.

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Its a whole new kind of boredom.
- Ash (The ICT Tech with a soul)



Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz

http://www.reason.com/0308/cr.vp.why.shtml

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Jason Clifford
On 3 Sep 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

 http://www.reason.com/0308/cr.vp.why.shtml

Sorry for me this The mere existence of Buffy proves the declinists wrong 
about one thing: Hollywood commercialism can produce great art. Complex 
and evolving characters turns the whole article into shite.

Hollywood commercialism had it's chance with Buffy and produced the movie 
- truly awful rubbish that nearly frightened any TV network from buying 
the show when Joss finally got complete control to make it himself.

Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)

Jason Clifford
-- 
UKFSN.ORG   Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net
http://www.ukfsn.org/   ADSL Broadband available now




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
At 08:38 -0700 9/3/03, Dave Cross wrote:
  Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)
You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
Peaks?
Ah, the ignorance of youth... ;-)



Liz



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Steve Mynott
Dave Cross wrote:

From: Jason Clifford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/3/03 2:51:26 PM
[ BtVS ]


Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)


You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
Peaks?
Have you seen the last episode of The Prisoner and if so would you 
also consider that to be the best TV ever made?

Or maybe some of the worse...

--
1024/D9C69DF9 Steve Mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Jason Clifford
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:

Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)
 You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
 Peaks?
 
 Ah, the ignorance of youth... ;-)

I am not that young and I watched both The Prisoner and Twin Peaks. 
Neither is as good in my opinion.

Jason Clifford
-- 
UKFSN.ORG   Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net
http://www.ukfsn.org/   ADSL Broadband available now




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Paul Mison
On 03/09/2003 at 17:16 +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:

Indeed BtVS is, at a rarely-precedented level, the work of one man.
It's clear, when watching interviews of the scenarists or other members
of the team, that Whedon had control over every aspect of the show. I
know no other example of this on TV, except McGoohan and the Prisoner.
Babylon 5 is an obvious counter-example, given JMS wrote most of the 
three central seasons single-handed as well as the overarching 
five-year arc. (Buffy, in so far as it had arcs, were single-season 
only. Nowhere near as impressive. Whedon wrote far fewer episodes 
too.)

I don't think either Whedon or Straczynski had particularly strong 
bargaining powers positions with the studios, either.

--
:: paul
:: historic light cone


Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Rafael == Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rafael Indeed BtVS is, at a rarely-precedented level, the work of one man.
Rafael It's clear, when watching interviews of the scenarists or other members
Rafael of the team, that Whedon had control over every aspect of the show. I
Rafael know no other example of this on TV, except McGoohan and the Prisoner.

B5?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Paul Mison wrote:
 Babylon 5 is an obvious counter-example,

First time I encounter this title. I think it was never
broadcast in France, at least not on a public channel. Or is
it ancient ?



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Dave Cross wrote:
 You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
 Peaks?

While Twin Peaks was pretty good, (and I enjoyed the companion movie as
well), I don't think it has the same level of achievement and
homogeneity than Buffy and the Prisoner. It's more like a testbed for
Lynch's next movies. Hopefully Lynch hasn't completely given away the
idea of coming back to TV...



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
At 16:47 +0100 9/3/03, Steve Mynott wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:
Have you seen the last episode of The Prisoner and if so would you 
also consider that to be the best TV ever made?
Or maybe some of the worse...
A think a lot has been said and written about the last episode of 
The Prisoner.  I'm pretty sure that that episode wasn't anywhere 
near what Patrick McGoohan intended:

There are many theories, some quite fanciful, as to why The Prisoner 
was made up of seventeen episodes - an extremely unlikely number in 
anyone's book. The simple truth is that, despite it's cult status 
today, the series bombed on it's first showing and the production, 
over budget and out of time, was cancelled. The cast and crew, with 
sixteen episodes filmed (but not necessarily completed), were told 
that they could make only one more episode to wrap up the loose ends 
- an episode unwritten and unscripted, yet due to go into production 
the following week! 

From:

  http://www.the-prisoner-6.freeserve.co.uk/episode_aftermath.htm



Liz



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Michel Rodriguez
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:

 Paul Mison wrote:
  Babylon 5 is an obvious counter-example,

 First time I encounter this title. I think it was never
 broadcast in France, at least not on a public channel. Or is
 it ancient ?

It was on Canal + a few years ago. I don't think it ever made it to
regular channels.

Michel Rodriguez
Perl amp; XML
http://www.xmltwig.com




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Jonathan Peterson
 
 Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)
  You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
  Peaks?
  
  Ah, the ignorance of youth... ;-)
 
 I am not that young and I watched both The Prisoner and Twin Peaks. 
 Neither is as good in my opinion.

Twin Peaks winds me up. I remember being in school when it was on, and the 
kind of people who were into it suffered from two other co-morbidities:

1. They liked Marillion
2. They tried to understand R.E.M. lyrics

Neither is the sign of a well ordered mind. But yeah, the walking 
backwards bit was good.

Anyway if we are ruling out comedies, then Northern Exposure was the best 
TV series ever made. Or Dr Who minus all the crap ones.

Otherwise it's obviously The Simpsons :-)






Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Nigel Rantor
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:

You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
Peaks?


While Twin Peaks was pretty good, (and I enjoyed the companion movie as
well), I don't think it has the same level of achievement and
homogeneity than Buffy and the Prisoner. It's more like a testbed for
Lynch's next movies. Hopefully Lynch hasn't completely given away the
idea of coming back to TV...
And Wild Palms was forgettable. Well, I saw it and now it is forgotten. 
QED. It was a shame really, I liked TP, the movie was okay. Although I 
can't say I ever got as wildly excited as some of my friends.

The Prisoner was great, dated far too easily, and it's a shame that 
no-one rated it when it came out so it died a very quick death in terms 
of production.

B5 is awesome. I didn't get into it when it first came out and now need 
to see it all the way through.

You may all get your rocks ready for this one, I expect a stoning from 
the zealots. (and Lusercop because he can't resist a good stoning)

Buffy the TV series is a far too pale imitation of the movie to ever 
really make me watch it. Basically it just pisses me off. The plots and 
characters are, quite frankly, a bag of shite. I figure that since any 
Buffy criticism is going to be met with a hail of bullets I may as well 
tell you guys what I tell my friends.

The worst thing they did was make it into a TV series. (Along with lots 
of other great movies like Highlander, American Grafitti etc etc).

  N




Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Roger Burton West
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:55:14PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:28:34PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
 Anyway if we are ruling out comedies, then Northern Exposure was the best 
 TV series ever made. Or Dr Who minus all the crap ones.
What?  Crap DW?? Never!

Timelash.

R



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread David H. Adler
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:28:34PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
  
  Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)
   You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
   Peaks?
   
   Ah, the ignorance of youth... ;-)
  
  I am not that young and I watched both The Prisoner and Twin Peaks. 
  Neither is as good in my opinion.

Frankly, I think comparing those shows to buffy is misguided.  It's sort
of like trying to compare 8 1/2 to the Philadelphia Story.  Ok, maybe
not quite *that* extreme.

 Twin Peaks winds me up. I remember being in school when it was on, and the 
 kind of people who were into it suffered from two other co-morbidities:
 
 1. They liked Marillion

Nope.

 2. They tried to understand R.E.M. lyrics

Only if really bored.

Twin Peaks was unique.  It's a kind of television that pretty much
doesn't exist otherwise.  I find it hard to do any kind of comparisons
to it.

That said, I don't think it's something everyone will appreciate.

 Anyway if we are ruling out comedies, then Northern Exposure was the best 
 TV series ever made. Or Dr Who minus all the crap ones.

What?  Crap DW?? Never!

Well, ok, Revenge of the Cybermen.  And The War Games is way too long.
And those dinosaurs...

Um.  Forget I said anything.  :-)

 Otherwise it's obviously The Simpsons :-)

Ok, that's up there.

dha

-- 
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
We honestly don't want to see another technicolored cow.
- the #macintosh faq



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Nigel == Nigel Rantor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Nigel Buffy the TV series is a far too pale imitation of the movie to ever
Nigel really make me watch it. Basically it just pisses me off. The plots
Nigel and characters are, quite frankly, a bag of shite. I figure that since
Nigel any Buffy criticism is going to be met with a hail of bullets I may as
Nigel well tell you guys what I tell my friends.

And SMG has never been naked ('cept for a couple of nipple slips in
one of the Scream/Summer movies, I forget which), but Kristy Swanson
recently appeared in Playboy.  Yum.  That makes KS superior, and therefore
the movie superior.

:-)

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Tony Bowden
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
 It's clear, when watching interviews of the scenarists or other members
 of the team, that Whedon had control over every aspect of the show. I
 know no other example of this on TV, except McGoohan and the Prisoner.

David E. Kelly wrote almost every episode of all of his shows. I'm not
sure how much control he had beyond that, but as he often had 3 of
them running simultaneously, it's still quite an impressive feat...

Tony



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Nigel Rantor
David H. Adler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:37:45PM +0100, Nigel Rantor wrote:
Buffy the TV series is a far too pale imitation of the movie to ever 
really make me watch it.
You realize, of course, that the movie was completely changed from its
original concept and that the tv series is much closer to what the
creator envisioned, right?
Well, to be honest, when all is said and done I can only comment on 
whether or not I liked the finished product. Which I did.

You may be right that the series is closer to the original author's 
vision but that really doesn't affect my opinion of the movie or tv show.

So, yes, maybe I like something that the author wasn't completely happy 
with. Well, so what? I liked it. I still do. Just because something does 
not turn out as the author intended does not make it better or worse. 
Entertainment is littered with 'happy accidents'.

Just checking.
Thats cool.

  N





Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread Dave Cross
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:47:34PM +0100, Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Dave Cross wrote:
 
 From: Jason Clifford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 9/3/03 2:51:26 PM
 
 [ BtVS ]
 
 Still - it was the best TV ever made ;)
 
 You jest surely. Have you never seen The Prisoner or Twin
 Peaks?
 
 Have you seen the last episode of The Prisoner and if so would you 
 also consider that to be the best TV ever made?

I've seen it many times. I have the DVD. I confess that the last episode
isn't exactly my favourite but the series as a whole is brilliant.

 Or maybe some of the worse...

Maybe just the most confusing :)

Dave...

-- 
  Drugs are just bad m'kay



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread David H. Adler
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:55:14PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:28:34PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
  Anyway if we are ruling out comedies, then Northern Exposure was the best 
  TV series ever made. Or Dr Who minus all the crap ones.
 What?  Crap DW?? Never!
 
 Timelash.

I submit.  :-)

-- 
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Perl should only be studied as a second language.  A good first
language would be English. - Larry Wall



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread David H. Adler
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:29:26PM +0100, Nigel Rantor wrote:
 David H. Adler wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:37:45PM +0100, Nigel Rantor wrote:
 Buffy the TV series is a far too pale imitation of the movie to ever 
 really make me watch it.
 
 You realize, of course, that the movie was completely changed from its
 original concept and that the tv series is much closer to what the
 creator envisioned, right?
 
 Well, to be honest, when all is said and done I can only comment on 
 whether or not I liked the finished product. Which I did.

Granted.  I was just having trouble with the pale imitation part of
your argument. :-)

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Religious zealots have a tendency towards mental illness.  You really
shouldn't expect much more from people who spend that much time trying
to prove that their imaginary friend is the *only* imaginary friend.
- Mark Rogaski



Re: Ob-buffy

2003-09-03 Thread David Cantrell
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:

While Twin Peaks was pretty good, (and I enjoyed the companion movie as
well), I don't think it has the same level of achievement and
homogeneity than Buffy and the Prisoner. It's more like a testbed for
Lynch's next movies. Hopefully Lynch hasn't completely given away the
idea of coming back to TV...
I couldn't stand Twin Peaks, thought it was utter dross.  Same goes for B5.

--
David Cantrell |  Reprobate  | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david
  While researching this email, I was forced to carry out some
  investigative work which unfortunately involved a bucket of
  puppies and a belt sander
-- after JoeB, in the Monastery