[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Winheld
 Oh, this is classic, Golden Age lute list stuff here!  Hah!!

   If I may rephrase Guy Smith's Sam Clemens quotation:

   When we remember that all lute players are mad, the mysteries
   disappear and theorboes stand explained.

--

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] possible scam warning!!!!! be careful.... from Anton Birula

2009-02-18 Thread Anton Birula
Dear List,

Want to inform you about suspected scam. I received and email from Brad Baker, 
offering a baroque guitar which looked too good to be real, then I even called 
the guy but once I asked more detailes he pretended he does not hear me 
Then I serched in google and got this: 

http://www.650motorcycles.com/ForSale.html

Just to warn you. looks like a set up

Best wishes Anton

==

Hi, 

I am Brad Baker.I came accross your wanted advert and email address on 
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/forsale.html#wanted I would like to 
inform you that i have 5 course baroque guitar For Sale @ $900(Give Away 
Price)including shipping to your front door in Finland via Courier express 
delivery.The price of this lutes are more than $2,500.You can't get it this 
price($900)anywhere.Hurry up now,this is give away price.

I await your reply.

Thanks,
Brad Baker
Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct) 

--- On Tue, 2/17/09, LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula i...@luteduo.com 
wrote:
From: LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula i...@luteduo.com
Subject: Re: 5 course baroque guitar For Sale $900(Give Away Price)
To: Brad Baker bradbake...@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:42 PM



I am afraid you are mistaken , my ddress is not on wanted list... but it is 
interesting in a way... who made the instrument?
Anton


Hi Anton,

Thank you for your email.This is not a mistake.I just want to sell it at an 
auction price of $900 because my wife is very sick of cancer so she needs 
emergency operation.It is made by Elena dal Cortivo.The price of this lute is 
over $2,500 but i just want to give it away $900 because of my wife bad cancer 
problem.The $900 also include shipping and handling charges to your shipping 
address.Where are you located?I would also need your shipping address for the 
shipment.I will ship as soon as i confirm payment..I am located in 
London,England.I will ship via UPS or Fed Ex express delivery.

I await your reply.

Thanks,

Brad Baker
Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct)








  



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread Anthony Hind

Dear Mimmo and All,
   If I have understood you correctly, there is a sort of  
contradiction :  as gut becomes thicker, it must be treated to make  
it more flexible (higher twist and possibly softening chemicals), or  
else it becomes inharmonic. The more flexible it is, for a given  
diameter, however, the less tension it can stand (the Breaking Index  
drops). Thus it is not the thickness itself, but the way thick gut is  
treated that makes it break quicker than thin  gut?


You say the Index of a modern gut string is 260 Hz/m, but this is  
only true true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.
I mean 38 till 46 mm (more or less), where strings are made with a  
very low twist  and gut is made harder by chemicals.


Does this mean that it is possible to substitute say a 44 treble  
anywhere where it is safe to use a 42 treble, keeping exactly the  
same breaking point in Hz; or does your more or less imply that  
even for 38 till 46 mm there will be a slight difference in twist  
or hardening, which could mean the 44 would be less strong than the 42?
Of course I realize that such a substitution would increase the  
playing tension, which may or may not be an advantage.

Regards
Anthony


 with a 44 treble
Le 18 févr. 09 à 07:21, Mimmo Peruffo a écrit :


   Hello guys,
   Just an observation: the suggested average of the Breacking  
Index of a
   modern gut string is 260 Hz/m.  However, the full range of  
modern lute

   strings ranging between 240- 300 Hz.mt.
   This is true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.  I mean 38  
till
   46 mm (more or less), were strings are made with a very low  
twist  and
   gut is made harder by chemicals. The Breacking Index drop in the  
case
   that  we are speacking of  thicker 1st strings, were they are  
made with

   more twist than the lute chantarelles.
   Example: on the 1st bass gamba strings the Breacking Index drop  
of a

   semitone-tone than the lute 1st strings.
   In fact this is function of some technological things: the twist
   quantity and the use (or not) of some substances ables to do gut  
harder

   etc etc.
   If we go in the range of the violone 1st strings the breacking  
Index
   drop again and again because such strings are made very very  
high twist
   and without any chemical tretment able to do gut stiffer. This  
is why,
   in my wiew, the  calculated Working Indexes (the product of the  
string

   scale X the supposed frequencies of the 1st strings) of the bowed
   instruments in the Praetorous tables drop step- by -step when the
   instrument became longer. So on Violins we are  in the  average  
of 210

   HZ/mt while, on violones, we drop to arround 180 Hz/m only.
   Ciao
   Mimmo
   alexander ha scritto:

No one seems to object, and the talk continues as if the very  
people that gave u
s all the amazing instruments we play, were totally ignorant as far  
as the oh, s
o stupid tune almost to the breaking point line goes. The simple  
truth of the
matter is that any string made of the same material will break at  
the same pitch
, no matter its' diameter, as long as the string length is the  
same. Some here s

till remember Eph Segerman?..
The stress on the string (represented by S) is the tension divided by
the cross-sectional area, so S=T/A. The tensile strength of a material
is defined as the stress at breaking (which we can represent by SB).
Then the breaking frequency, represented by fB becomes: fB =
(1/2L)sqrt(SB/r). This demonstrates that the breaking pitch is
inversely proportional to the string stop.
In the formula, (as can not be seen here, unfortunately) the invert  
relation is
only between the pitch, length and the breaking point stress.  
Diameter plays no
role. All this means a very simple truth - all the instruments of  
the same mensu
ra tuned close to the breaking point of a given material, will have  
the same pit
ch, to the same degree as an organ pipe of the same length and  
diameter will pro
duce the same pitch, be it in France or England. I hazard to say  
that, among pro
fessionals who used no rotten strings and preferred particular  
strings made by
 the same makers and even at particular time of the year, the pitch  
standard was

 no worse then nowadays.
alexander

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:29:32 -0800
howard posner [1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com wrote:


On Feb 17, 2009, at 5:43 PM, [2]chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:


How many of us really follow this fundamental of lute stringing
today?  We tune our instruments to arbitrarily agreed upon pitches
like 415, 392, 440 etc because its practical.  If we were to do the
truly historical thing, Jeff's G lute would be at 449, Joe's at
412, Tina's at 463 and Bill's at 398.

That wouldn't have worked in 1610 either.  They all had to use an
agreed pitch if they were going to play together, unless they were
into the whole John Cage thing.


--

To get on or off this list see list information at
[3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: possible scam warning!!!!! be careful.... from Anton Birula

2009-02-18 Thread Ron Fletcher
The phone number appears genuine...but it is not a land-line

http://www.ukphoneinfo.com/search.php?GNG=07024038157Submit=Submitd=nl

0044 is the international dialling code to the UK

This replaces the first 0 for national calls.

Over to you

Ron UK

-Original Message-
From: Anton Birula [mailto:image...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:05 AM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] possible scam warning! be careful from Anton Birula

Dear List,

Want to inform you about suspected scam. I received and email from Brad
Baker, offering a baroque guitar which looked too good to be real, then I
even called the guy but once I asked more detailes he pretended he does not
hear me Then I serched in google and got this: 

http://www.650motorcycles.com/ForSale.html

Just to warn you. looks like a set up

Best wishes Anton

==

Hi, 

I am Brad Baker.I came accross your wanted advert and email address on
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/forsale.html#wanted I would like to
inform you that i have 5 course baroque guitar For Sale @ $900(Give Away
Price)including shipping to your front door in Finland via Courier express
delivery.The price of this lutes are more than $2,500.You can't get it this
price($900)anywhere.Hurry up now,this is give away price.

I await your reply.

Thanks,
Brad Baker
Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct) 

--- On Tue, 2/17/09, LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula
i...@luteduo.com wrote:
From: LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula i...@luteduo.com
Subject: Re: 5 course baroque guitar For Sale $900(Give Away Price)
To: Brad Baker bradbake...@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:42 PM



I am afraid you are mistaken , my ddress is not on wanted list... but it is
interesting in a way... who made the instrument?
Anton


Hi Anton,

Thank you for your email.This is not a mistake.I just want to sell it at an
auction price of $900 because my wife is very sick of cancer so she needs
emergency operation.It is made by Elena dal Cortivo.The price of this lute
is over $2,500 but i just want to give it away $900 because of my wife bad
cancer problem.The $900 also include shipping and handling charges to your
shipping address.Where are you located?I would also need your shipping
address for the shipment.I will ship as soon as i confirm payment..I am
located in London,England.I will ship via UPS or Fed Ex express delivery.

I await your reply.

Thanks,

Brad Baker
Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct)








  



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread Mimmo Peruffo
   Hello Anthony,
My first answer is: yes, for the string formula the diameter is,
   teorethically, ininfluent. So the breacking index is always the same.
   However, in practise there are some difference due to the surface
   treatments ables to do a string polished etc etc.
   My 'more or less' mean a certain range of gauges like those I wrote: I
   do not know if other stringmakers  employ the special technical way
   useful to do thiner lute trbles for thicker gauges.
   However, the breacking idex is the same for all these gauges. I mean
   that if you increase the diameter also the tension go up of the same
   ammount. So  diameter/tension for unit is  always a costant.
   Tne only pratical difference, using a thicker gauge, is that the
   resistance to the superficial abrasion caused by sweet fingers is
   better.  I mean: less hairs on the string.
   Mimmo
   Anthony Hind ha scritto:

 Dear Mimmo and All,
If I have understood you correctly, there is a sort of
 contradiction :  as gut becomes thicker, it must be treated to make
 it more flexible (higher twist and possibly softening chemicals), or
 else it becomes inharmonic. The more flexible it is, for a given
 diameter, however, the less tension it can stand (the Breaking Index
 drops). Thus it is not the thickness itself, but the way thick gut
 is treated that makes it break quicker than thin  gut?
 You say the Index of a modern gut string is 260 Hz/m, but this is
 only true true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.
 I mean 38 till 46 mm (more or less), where strings are made with a
 very low twist  and gut is made harder by chemicals.
 Does this mean that it is possible to substitute say a 44 treble
 anywhere where it is safe to use a 42 treble, keeping exactly the
 same breaking point in Hz; or does your more or less imply that
 even for 38 till 46 mm there will be a slight difference in twist
 or hardening, which could mean the 44 would be less strong than the
 42?
 Of course I realize that such a substitution would increase the
 playing tension, which may or may not be an advantage.
 Regards
 Anthony


   Messaggio e-mail verificato da Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
   Versione database: 5.11780
   [1]http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
   --

References

   1. http://www.pctools.com/it/spyware-doctor-antivirus/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread alexander
The degree of twist is decisive, when all the rest is equal for a given gut 
(treatment, animal of origin, etc) for the breaking strength. I would hazard 
that .44 is made with the same twist by the same maker as .42. Which means if 
your instrument can take it, it will substitute for .42 just fine. .44 will be 
equally strong. The need to change the twist degree arrives at other diameter 
ranges, it appears.
Interestingly enough, the working string length of historical instruments, 
drops slightly in relation to the mathematical formula, which means that, as 
Mimmo pointed out, the string twist was higher for the longer instruments.


alexander

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:29:08 +0100
Anthony Hind anthony.h...@noos.fr wrote:

 Dear Mimmo and All,
 If I have understood you correctly, there is a sort of  
 contradiction :  as gut becomes thicker, it must be treated to make  
 it more flexible (higher twist and possibly softening chemicals), or  
 else it becomes inharmonic. The more flexible it is, for a given  
 diameter, however, the less tension it can stand (the Breaking Index  
 drops). Thus it is not the thickness itself, but the way thick gut is  
 treated that makes it break quicker than thin  gut?
 
 You say the Index of a modern gut string is 260 Hz/m, but this is  
 only true true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.
 I mean 38 till 46 mm (more or less), where strings are made with a  
 very low twist  and gut is made harder by chemicals.
 
 Does this mean that it is possible to substitute say a 44 treble  
 anywhere where it is safe to use a 42 treble, keeping exactly the  
 same breaking point in Hz; or does your more or less imply that  
 even for 38 till 46 mm there will be a slight difference in twist  
 or hardening, which could mean the 44 would be less strong than the 42?
 Of course I realize that such a substitution would increase the  
 playing tension, which may or may not be an advantage.
 Regards
 Anthony
 
 
   with a 44 treble
 Le 18 févr. 09 à 07:21, Mimmo Peruffo a écrit :
   
 Hello guys,
 Just an observation: the suggested average of the Breacking  
  Index of a
 modern gut string is 260 Hz/m.  However, the full range of  
  modern lute
 strings ranging between 240- 300 Hz.mt.
 This is true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.  I mean 38  
  till
 46 mm (more or less), were strings are made with a very low  
  twist  and
 gut is made harder by chemicals. The Breacking Index drop in the  
  case
 that  we are speacking of  thicker 1st strings, were they are  
  made with
 more twist than the lute chantarelles.
 Example: on the 1st bass gamba strings the Breacking Index drop  
  of a
 semitone-tone than the lute 1st strings.
 In fact this is function of some technological things: the twist
 quantity and the use (or not) of some substances ables to do gut  
  harder
 etc etc.
 If we go in the range of the violone 1st strings the breacking  
  Index
 drop again and again because such strings are made very very  
  high twist
 and without any chemical tretment able to do gut stiffer. This  
  is why,
 in my wiew, the  calculated Working Indexes (the product of the  
  string
 scale X the supposed frequencies of the 1st strings) of the bowed
 instruments in the Praetorous tables drop step- by -step when the
 instrument became longer. So on Violins we are  in the  average  
  of 210
 HZ/mt while, on violones, we drop to arround 180 Hz/m only.
 Ciao
 Mimmo
 alexander ha scritto:
   



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread Anthony Hind



Thank you both, Mimmo and Alexander, for your very complete answers
Anthony

Le 18 févr. 09 à 13:20, alexander a écrit :

The degree of twist is decisive, when all the rest is equal for a  
given gut (treatment, animal of origin, etc) for the breaking  
strength. I would hazard that .44 is made with the same twist by  
the same maker as .42. Which means if your instrument can take it,  
it will substitute for .42 just fine. .44 will be equally strong.  
The need to change the twist degree arrives at other diameter  
ranges, it appears.
Interestingly enough, the working string length of historical  
instruments, drops slightly in relation to the mathematical  
formula, which means that, as Mimmo pointed out, the string twist  
was higher for the longer instruments.



alexander

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:29:08 +0100
Anthony Hind anthony.h...@noos.fr wrote:


Dear Mimmo and All,
If I have understood you correctly, there is a sort of
contradiction :  as gut becomes thicker, it must be treated to make
it more flexible (higher twist and possibly softening chemicals), or
else it becomes inharmonic. The more flexible it is, for a given
diameter, however, the less tension it can stand (the Breaking Index
drops). Thus it is not the thickness itself, but the way thick gut is
treated that makes it break quicker than thin  gut?

You say the Index of a modern gut string is 260 Hz/m, but this is
only true true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.
I mean 38 till 46 mm (more or less), where strings are made with a
very low twist  and gut is made harder by chemicals.

Does this mean that it is possible to substitute say a 44 treble
anywhere where it is safe to use a 42 treble, keeping exactly the
same breaking point in Hz; or does your more or less imply that
even for 38 till 46 mm there will be a slight difference in twist
or hardening, which could mean the 44 would be less strong than  
the 42?

Of course I realize that such a substitution would increase the
playing tension, which may or may not be an advantage.
Regards
Anthony


  with a 44 treble
Le 18 févr. 09 à 07:21, Mimmo Peruffo a écrit :


   Hello guys,
   Just an observation: the suggested average of the Breacking
Index of a
   modern gut string is 260 Hz/m.  However, the full range of
modern lute
   strings ranging between 240- 300 Hz.mt.
   This is true for the range of lute 1st string gauges.  I mean 38
till
   46 mm (more or less), were strings are made with a very low
twist  and
   gut is made harder by chemicals. The Breacking Index drop in the
case
   that  we are speacking of  thicker 1st strings, were they are
made with
   more twist than the lute chantarelles.
   Example: on the 1st bass gamba strings the Breacking Index drop
of a
   semitone-tone than the lute 1st strings.
   In fact this is function of some technological things: the twist
   quantity and the use (or not) of some substances ables to do gut
harder
   etc etc.
   If we go in the range of the violone 1st strings the breacking
Index
   drop again and again because such strings are made very very
high twist
   and without any chemical tretment able to do gut stiffer. This
is why,
   in my wiew, the  calculated Working Indexes (the product of the
string
   scale X the supposed frequencies of the 1st strings) of the bowed
   instruments in the Praetorous tables drop step- by -step when the
   instrument became longer. So on Violins we are  in the  average
of 210
   HZ/mt while, on violones, we drop to arround 180 Hz/m only.
   Ciao
   Mimmo
   alexander ha scritto:





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: Theorbo Nicki don't lose that number

2009-02-18 Thread howard posner
On Feb 18, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

 However without troubling yourself to trawl these, you will also see
from my recent postings that there's absolutely nothing 'wrong'
 with
small theorboes but just that the use of large theorbo tuning (ie
double reentrant in A or G) on the smaller instruments does not
 tally
with the historical record (see archives).

So Martyn keeps saying.  But if you were to trouble to trawl through
the archives that he always refers to generally but never
specifically, you'll see one post after another in which Martyn
resolutely refused to admit what everyone knows: that there is no
evidence tying any specific historical instrument of any specific
size to any specific tuning or stringing.  Mostly he did this by
referring to the archives generally but never specifically.


--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: possible scam warning!!!!! be careful.... from Anton Birula

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Winheld
   Of course it's a scam. Just scroll all the way down to the bottom of
   the very page he so thoughtfully sent you (so dumb, these scammers)
   from our own lute list website:

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/forsale.html#wanted,

   If someone seems to have difficulty writing the language of the
   country they claim to come from.

   These jerks all sound the same, and to a native or (equivalently
   familiar English speaker) their use of language is always a dead
   giveaway. I have never seen the word advert used in any of my legit
   dealings with builders, sellers, or buyers anywhere in the Anglophonic
   world. There must a school for online scammers where they learn to
   write this style, as it never varies. And yet, enough people are still
   being fooled to keep them in business- no category is immune; anything
   being bought or sold, any transaction on the internet attracts them
   like flies to horse poop.

 Dear List,
 Want to inform you about suspected scam. I received and email from
 Brad Baker, offering a baroque guitar which looked too good to be
 real, then I even called the guy but once I asked more detailes he
 pretended he does not hear me Then I serched in google and got
 this:

 http://www.650motorcycles.com/ForSale.html

--

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Breaking pitch

2009-02-18 Thread David Tayler
Hypothetical converstation between the music 
director/organist and the lute player:

Dir: Dude, you are way flat!
LP: No way!
Dir: Via!
LP: Don't talk Latin!
Dir: Don't talk back
LP: Why don't you tune those 10, pipes 
instead! Tune 'em up as high as they will go before they melt!

Dir: Picci, please pack your guts and go.


dt
At 07:42 PM 2/17/2009, you wrote:
No one seems to object, and the talk continues 
as if the very people that gave us all the 
amazing instruments we play, were totally 
ignorant as far as the oh, so stupid tune 
almost to the breaking point line goes. The 
simple truth of the matter is that any string 
made of the same material will break at the same 
pitch, no matter its' diameter, as long as the 
string length is the same. Some here still remember Eph Segerman?..

The stress on the string (represented by S) is the tension divided by
the cross-sectional area, so S=T/A. The tensile strength of a material
is defined as the stress at breaking (which we can represent by SB).
Then the breaking frequency, represented by fB becomes: fB =
(1/2L)sqrt(SB/). This demonstrates that the breaking pitch is
inversely proportional to the string stop.
In the formula, (as can not be seen here, 
unfortunately) the invert relation is only 
between the pitch, length and the breaking point 
stress. Diameter plays no role. All this means a 
very simple truth - all the instruments of the 
same mensura tuned close to the breaking point 
of a given material, will have the same pitch, 
to the same degree as an organ pipe of the same 
length and diameter will produce the same pitch, 
be it in France or England. I hazard to say 
that, among professionals who used no rotten 
strings and preferred particular strings made 
by the same makers and even at particular time 
of the year, the pitch standard was no worse then nowadays.

alexander

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:29:32 -0800
howard posner howardpos...@ca.rr.com wrote:

 On Feb 17, 2009, at 5:43 PM, chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:

  How many of us really follow this fundamental of lute stringing
  today?  We tune our instruments to arbitrarily agreed upon pitches
  like 415, 392, 440 etc because its practical.  If we were to do the
  truly historical thing, Jeff's G lute would be at 449, Joe's at
  412, Tina's at 463 and Bill's at 398.

 That wouldn't have worked in 1610 either.  They all had to use an
 agreed pitch if they were going to play together, unless they were
 into the whole John Cage thing.


 --

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: possible scam warning!!!!! be careful.... from Anton Birula

2009-02-18 Thread EUGENE BRAIG IV
..And, as far as I know, the person named as a maker has never built 
instruments, but instead makes inset guitar/vihuela/mandolin roses for hire.

Eugene

- Original Message -
From: Wayne Cripps w...@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:18 pm
Subject: [LUTE] Re: possible scam warning! be careful from Anton Birula
To: image...@yahoo.com (Anton Birula)
Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu


 Hello Anton -

 I got that message too, and I think that everyone selling
 a lute
 on my web page got a copy. If you look closely at the
 guitars pictured
 (from the Barber and Harris web page) you will see that they are
 all different! It is a scam.

 And I don't have a front door in Finland, either!

 Wayne

 
  Dear List,
 
  Want to inform you about suspected scam. I received and email
 from Brad Baker, offering a baroque guitar which looked too good
 to be real, then I even called the guy but once I asked more
 detailes he pretended he does not hear me Then I serched in
 google and got this:
 
  http://www.650motorcycles.com/ForSale.html
 
  Just to warn you. looks like a set up
 
  Best wishes Anton
 
 
 ==
  Hi,
 
  I am Brad Baker.I came accross your wanted advert and email
 address on
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/forsale.html#wanted I
 would like to inform you that i have 5 course baroque guitar For
 Sale @ $900(Give Away Price)including shipping to your front
 door in Finland via Courier express delivery.The price of this
 lutes are more than $2,500.You can't get it this
 price($900)anywhere.Hurry up now,this is give away price.
 
  I await your reply.
 
  Thanks,
  Brad Baker
  Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct)
 
  --- On Tue, 2/17/09, LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula
 i...@luteduo.com wrote:
  From: LUTE DUO Anna Kowalska  Anton Birula i...@luteduo.com
  Subject: Re: 5 course baroque guitar For Sale $900(Give Away Price)
  To: Brad Baker bradbake...@yahoo.com
  Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:42 PM
 
 
 
  I am afraid you are mistaken , my ddress is not on wanted
 list... but it is interesting in a way... who made the instrument?
  Anton
 
 
  Hi Anton,
 
  Thank you for your email.This is not a mistake.I just want to
 sell it at an auction price of $900 because my wife is very sick
 of cancer so she needs emergency operation.It is made by Elena
 dal Cortivo.The price of this lute is over $2,500 but i just
 want to give it away $900 because of my wife bad cancer
 problem.The $900 also include shipping and handling charges to
 your shipping address.Where are you located?I would also need
 your shipping address for the shipment.I will ship as soon as i
 confirm payment..I am located in London,England.I will ship via
 UPS or Fed Ex express delivery.
 
  I await your reply.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Brad Baker
  Tel:+44 702 403 8157(dial direct)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 




--