proof in Lyx
How can I make inferences like :
B C
--- (y)
A D
-- (x)
E
There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
there a solution ?
Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
Nicolas.
Re: proof in Lyx
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:50:43 +0200
From: Nicolas SABOURET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: proof in Lyx
How can I make inferences like :
B C
--- (y)
A D
-- (x)
E
There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
there a solution ?
Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
Nicolas.
Seems that the best way is to define newcommands for complicated math
in the preamble (the LaTeX stuff), or to use math macros
(the LyX stuff, have a look at the UserGuideM chapter Math).
--
Jean-Pierre
Any RedHat 7 users out there?
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. I'm looking at an alternative program called Texmacs at the moment, but it is not quite so far along as Lyx, and I'd like to keep up the Lyx effort. -- Paul E. Johnson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Political Sciencehttp://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086 Lawrence, Kansas 66045FAX: (785) 864-5700
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT Paul E Johnson said: If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be out soon. There were entirely too many things that just did not work under 7.0, compiling was one of them, and if you can't compile, what's the point? -- Seeya, Paul I'm in shape, my shape just happens to be pear! If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote: As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Try with kgcc -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
Re: Compiling Lyx statically against xforms (fwd)
Thanks Yann Collete and Michael Hanke, that worked perfectly. You learn something new every day :-) On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Michael Hanke wrote: On Die, 10 Okt 2000 you wrote: But again xforms was compiled dynamically and I was shown the following message: src/lyx: error in loading shared libraries: libforms.so.0.88: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Your easiest solution is to set an environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH:' export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/your/xform/location for simplicity, you write a small shell script which sets this variable before calling lyx. /Michael
How to make an enumerated list
Hello: How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: 1. This is on item 1.1. This is a subitem 1.2. This is another subitem 1.2.1 This is a subsubitem 1.3 This is another subitem 2. This is another item 3. This is another item 3.1 This is a subitem I want to put this list as part of the text. Thanks Ramón
Re: How to make an enumerated list
"Ramón Flores d'as Seixas" wrote: Hello: How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: 1. This is on item 1.1. This is a subitem 1.2. This is another subitem 1.2.1 This is a subsubitem 1.3 This is another subitem choose paragraph layout enumerated. write 1. with enter at the end of the line. choose Layout-change environment depth, write your next line. you can use the shortcut alt-p right cursor or left cursor for the other direction. Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/
Re: can't fire up LyX
Kan Chee Siong wrote: I tried to install LyX on a PC running windows98, not connected to network. But get the following error message when I try to fire up the LyX: Not enough environment space. I can fire up the Xwin32 manually. The IP add. set in Xwin32 was 127.0.0.1 Thanks From the Lyx for windows home page: Known problems and available fixes (if present ;-) Out of environmental space When calling the batch file RUNLYX.BAT you get the above error message. Make sure you have enough environment space configured on your system in C:\CONFIG.SYS. I recommend 1536 Bytes, so you need a line shell=C:\command.com C:\ /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS, assuming that COMMAND.COM resides in C:\ on your system! If COMMAND.COM is not present in C:\ on your system it is usually present in the main Windows directory, i.e. C:\WINDOWS by default. Then you have to set shell=C:\WINDOWS\command.com C:\WINDOWS /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS. I hope this helps, -Mario
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
"Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors Paul pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug Paul report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. Paul If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Paul 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? Paul 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Paul 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Paul I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system Paul in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've Paul searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. How about something really useful? Trace the compilation errors and supply patches. Chances are, the problem is not that there is something "wrong" with gcc-2.96 - but more likely it is due to the greater standards conformance. In other words, you're most likely seeing bugs in lyx - and patches would certainly be welcomed.
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? From what I heard there are older compilers as well on RedHat 7.0. So maybe you should simply try to install another one? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Probably the best option. Andre' -- Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyx does not display all math symbols
Hello, I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the rpm provided on the lyx home page. Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. Any idea of what could be wrong? Thanks, Benoit Pelletier
Re: Lyx does not display all math symbols
Ok, I found the problem; probably conflicting fonts; I removed drakfont from /etc/X11/fs/config and it worked. Sorry about that; I whould have thought of it before. Benoit Pelletier Benoit Pelletier wrote: Hello, I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the rpm provided on the lyx home page. Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. Any idea of what could be wrong? Thanks, Benoit Pelletier
LyX under 7.0
I do not see why people cannot use the rpm compiled on a 6.2 system. Better than switching to texmac or whatever. Mate
unsubscibberish
You can just unsubscribe by sending any message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do not forget about confirming your request. In case of problems, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mate
proof in Lyx
How can I make inferences like :
B C
--- (y)
A D
-- (x)
E
There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
there a solution ?
Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
Nicolas.
Re: proof in Lyx
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:50:43 +0200
From: Nicolas SABOURET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: proof in Lyx
How can I make inferences like :
B C
--- (y)
A D
-- (x)
E
There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
there a solution ?
Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
Nicolas.
Seems that the best way is to define newcommands for complicated math
in the preamble (the LaTeX stuff), or to use math macros
(the LyX stuff, have a look at the UserGuideM chapter Math).
--
Jean-Pierre
Any RedHat 7 users out there?
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. I'm looking at an alternative program called Texmacs at the moment, but it is not quite so far along as Lyx, and I'd like to keep up the Lyx effort. -- Paul E. Johnson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Political Sciencehttp://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086 Lawrence, Kansas 66045FAX: (785) 864-5700
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT Paul E Johnson said: If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be out soon. There were entirely too many things that just did not work under 7.0, compiling was one of them, and if you can't compile, what's the point? -- Seeya, Paul I'm in shape, my shape just happens to be pear! If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote: As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Try with kgcc -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
Re: Compiling Lyx statically against xforms (fwd)
Thanks Yann Collete and Michael Hanke, that worked perfectly. You learn something new every day :-) On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Michael Hanke wrote: On Die, 10 Okt 2000 you wrote: But again xforms was compiled dynamically and I was shown the following message: src/lyx: error in loading shared libraries: libforms.so.0.88: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Your easiest solution is to set an environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH:' export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/your/xform/location for simplicity, you write a small shell script which sets this variable before calling lyx. /Michael
How to make an enumerated list
Hello: How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: 1. This is on item 1.1. This is a subitem 1.2. This is another subitem 1.2.1 This is a subsubitem 1.3 This is another subitem 2. This is another item 3. This is another item 3.1 This is a subitem I want to put this list as part of the text. Thanks Ramón
Re: How to make an enumerated list
"Ramón Flores d'as Seixas" wrote: Hello: How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: 1. This is on item 1.1. This is a subitem 1.2. This is another subitem 1.2.1 This is a subsubitem 1.3 This is another subitem choose paragraph layout enumerated. write 1. with enter at the end of the line. choose Layout-change environment depth, write your next line. you can use the shortcut alt-p right cursor or left cursor for the other direction. Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/
Re: can't fire up LyX
Kan Chee Siong wrote: I tried to install LyX on a PC running windows98, not connected to network. But get the following error message when I try to fire up the LyX: Not enough environment space. I can fire up the Xwin32 manually. The IP add. set in Xwin32 was 127.0.0.1 Thanks From the Lyx for windows home page: Known problems and available fixes (if present ;-) Out of environmental space When calling the batch file RUNLYX.BAT you get the above error message. Make sure you have enough environment space configured on your system in C:\CONFIG.SYS. I recommend 1536 Bytes, so you need a line shell=C:\command.com C:\ /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS, assuming that COMMAND.COM resides in C:\ on your system! If COMMAND.COM is not present in C:\ on your system it is usually present in the main Windows directory, i.e. C:\WINDOWS by default. Then you have to set shell=C:\WINDOWS\command.com C:\WINDOWS /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS. I hope this helps, -Mario
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
"Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors Paul pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug Paul report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. Paul If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Paul 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? Paul 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Paul 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Paul I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system Paul in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've Paul searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. How about something really useful? Trace the compilation errors and supply patches. Chances are, the problem is not that there is something "wrong" with gcc-2.96 - but more likely it is due to the greater standards conformance. In other words, you're most likely seeing bugs in lyx - and patches would certainly be welcomed.
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? From what I heard there are older compilers as well on RedHat 7.0. So maybe you should simply try to install another one? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Probably the best option. Andre' -- Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyx does not display all math symbols
Hello, I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the rpm provided on the lyx home page. Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. Any idea of what could be wrong? Thanks, Benoit Pelletier
Re: Lyx does not display all math symbols
Ok, I found the problem; probably conflicting fonts; I removed drakfont from /etc/X11/fs/config and it worked. Sorry about that; I whould have thought of it before. Benoit Pelletier Benoit Pelletier wrote: Hello, I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the rpm provided on the lyx home page. Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. Any idea of what could be wrong? Thanks, Benoit Pelletier
LyX under 7.0
I do not see why people cannot use the rpm compiled on a 6.2 system. Better than switching to texmac or whatever. Mate
unsubscibberish
You can just unsubscribe by sending any message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do not forget about confirming your request. In case of problems, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mate
proof in Lyx
How can I make inferences like :
B C
--- (y)
A D
-- (x)
E
There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
there a solution ?
Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
Nicolas.
Re: proof in Lyx
>>Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:50:43 +0200
>>From: Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: proof in Lyx
>>
>>How can I make inferences like :
>> B C
>> --- (y)
>> A D
>>-- (x)
>> E
>>
>>There exists a "proof.sty" package with a "\infer{}{}" command, but if
>>A,B,C,D,E are big math formulaes, I can't use "\infer{}{}" in math mode
>>: it doesn't hold on a single lyx line (screen isn't wide enough :)). Is
>>there a solution ?
>>Can I temporarily redefine \frac by \infer ? How can I do this ?
>>Nicolas.
Seems that the best way is to define newcommands for complicated math
in the preamble (the LaTeX stuff), or to use math macros
(the LyX stuff, have a look at the UserGuideM chapter Math).
--
Jean-Pierre
Any RedHat 7 users out there?
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. I'm looking at an alternative program called Texmacs at the moment, but it is not quite so far along as Lyx, and I'd like to keep up the Lyx effort. -- Paul E. Johnson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Political Sciencehttp://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086 Lawrence, Kansas 66045FAX: (785) 864-5700
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT Paul E Johnson said: >If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be out soon. There were entirely too many things that just did not work under 7.0, compiling was one of them, and if you can't compile, what's the point? -- Seeya, Paul I'm in shape, my shape just happens to be pear! If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote: > As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus > compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors > pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug > report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. > > If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? > > 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? > 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? > 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Try with kgcc -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
Re: Compiling Lyx statically against xforms (fwd)
Thanks Yann Collete and Michael Hanke, that worked perfectly. You learn something new every day :-) On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Michael Hanke wrote: > On Die, 10 Okt 2000 you wrote: > > But again xforms was compiled dynamically and I was shown the following > > message: > > src/lyx: error in loading shared libraries: libforms.so.0.88: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > > Your easiest solution is to set an environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH:' > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/your/xform/location > > for simplicity, you write a small shell script which sets this variable before > calling lyx. > > /Michael
How to make an enumerated list
Hello: How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: 1. This is on item 1.1. This is a subitem 1.2. This is another subitem 1.2.1 This is a subsubitem 1.3 This is another subitem 2. This is another item 3. This is another item 3.1 This is a subitem I want to put this list as part of the text. Thanks Ramón
Re: How to make an enumerated list
"Ramón Flores d'as Seixas" wrote: > > Hello: > > How can I do an enumerated list like the following one: > > 1. This is on item > > 1.1. This is a subitem > > 1.2. This is another subitem >1.2.1 This is a subsubitem > > 1.3 This is another subitem choose paragraph layout enumerated. write 1. with enter at the end of the line. choose Layout->change environment depth, write your next line. you can use the shortcut alt-p right cursor or left cursor for the other direction. Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/
Re: can't fire up LyX
Kan Chee Siong wrote: > I tried to install LyX on a PC running windows98, not connected to network. > But get the following error message when I try to fire up the LyX: > > Not enough environment space. > > I can fire up the Xwin32 manually. The IP add. set in Xwin32 was 127.0.0.1 > > Thanks >From the Lyx for windows home page: Known problems and available fixes (if present ;-) Out of environmental space When calling the batch file RUNLYX.BAT you get the above error message. Make sure you have enough environment space configured on your system in C:\CONFIG.SYS. I recommend 1536 Bytes, so you need a line shell=C:\command.com C:\ /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS, assuming that COMMAND.COM resides in C:\ on your system! If COMMAND.COM is not present in C:\ on your system it is usually present in the main Windows directory, i.e. C:\WINDOWS by default. Then you have to set shell=C:\WINDOWS\command.com C:\WINDOWS /e:1536 /p in your C:\CONFIG.SYS. I hope this helps, -Mario
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
> "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus Paul> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors Paul> pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug Paul> report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. Paul> If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? Paul> 1. Wait for RedHat to issue new gcc? Paul> 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Paul> 3. Get somebody to build a statically linked lyx? Paul> I'm leaning to option number 2, but don't know if it will harm my system Paul> in any way. If others have overcome the problem, I'd like to know. I've Paul> searched pretty far and wide in the usenet for solutions. How about something really useful? Trace the compilation errors and supply patches. Chances are, the problem is not that there is something "wrong" with gcc-2.96 - but more likely it is due to the greater standards conformance. In other words, you're most likely seeing bugs in lyx - and patches would certainly be welcomed.
Re: Any RedHat 7 users out there?
> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus > compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors > pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug > report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it. > > If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do? >From what I heard there are older compilers as well on RedHat 7.0. So maybe you should simply try to install another one? > 2. Remove gcc-2.96 and retrofit gcc-2.95.2? Probably the best option. Andre' -- Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyx does not display all math symbols
Hello, I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the rpm provided on the lyx home page. Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. Any idea of what could be wrong? Thanks, Benoit Pelletier
Re: Lyx does not display all math symbols
Ok, I found the problem; probably conflicting fonts; I removed drakfont from /etc/X11/fs/config and it worked. Sorry about that; I whould have thought of it before. Benoit Pelletier Benoit Pelletier wrote: > > Hello, > > I recently installed lyx-1.1.5fix1 on my Mandrake 7.1 machine using the > rpm provided on the lyx home page. > > Some of the math symbols do not show on the lyx window; the integral and > the sum (I did not try them all) don't show for sure. > > Any idea of what could be wrong? > Thanks, > > Benoit Pelletier
LyX under 7.0
I do not see why people cannot use the rpm compiled on a 6.2 system. Better than switching to texmac or whatever. Mate
unsubscibberish
You can just unsubscribe by sending any message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do not forget about confirming your request. In case of problems, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mate
