Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-13 Thread Chris Blouch
Seems a bit slow. I usually get about 10GB/hour throughput on wifi 
backups, so I would expect 125GB to easily complete in a day. Of course 
if your machine goes to sleep or other things use up bandwidth your 
mileage may vary. There was also discussion about issues with slow 
performance on wifi in certain situations which seems to be an OSX bug:


https://discussions.apple.com/message/19083821#19083821#19083821

That said, once you get your first backup done the incrementals should 
be much faster.


CB

On 11/11/12 5:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur wrote:

Thanks for all your support,
As we speak the backup is going slowly but surely.
Could anyone of you experts suggest a course of action to try to 
attempt the wired connection with a cable without passing through 
router?  At the moment I have the ethernet connected to both macs 
without a router but I have a feeling that the network is still 
happening over wifi.


It is very slow for now. 2 days for 125 gigs.

Thanks again,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com 
http://www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online stores.


On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Chris Blouch cblo...@aol.com 
mailto:cblo...@aol.com wrote:


I've had pretty good luck with time machine over wifi. I have an old 
Mac G4 running in the basement with a 500GB drive for time machine 
backups wired to my wifi router. I then have sharing turned on and 
mounted that drive on a laptop and told time machine to use it. It 
seems to back up a lot of the time since I'm back on 802.11G since my 
Airport died. It was much more reasonable with 802.11N. In other 
words, if you're patient you might be fine just doing time machine 
backups over wifi and will have no need of a frankencable setup.


CB

On 11/7/12 12:31 AM, Tim Kilburn wrote:

Hi,

You are correct in most accounts.  Time Machine will continue from 
where it left off if all things are equal, meaning that you're using 
the same Backup location and configuration as well as connection 
method.  Yes it should be much quicker on future backups.


With respect to the Internet connection being lost when the ethernet 
cable is connected.  Try going to the System Prefs, in the Network 
pane.  In the Actions pop-up menu, choose Set Service Order and 
then drag the WIFI above the Ethernet service.  This should allow 
the WIFI to maintain its Internet connection but still allow 
connectivity between computers with the ethernet cable.  Note that 
should is my favourite word in computer-land so I'm not promising 
that it will work perfectly.  I do, in my world, use multiple 
network services but these are usually in a Server environment so 
your machine may behave differently.


Good luck.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On 2012-11-06, at 12:50 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com 
mailto:igandra...@gmail.com wrote:



Thanks for your detailed response.
Like you said, it opens up more questiones than it answers.

I have a sighted husband that could help with non VO friendly 
solutions. Could you mind telling me what those might be?


Also, I am just thinking letting timemachine do its thing although 
it takes forever. I am thinking that for subsequent bakcups it 
would be faster since there is less to update. Do any of you know 
if timemachine can continue backup where it left off if the backup 
was interrupted? IN this case am I risking corrupted data?


hanks very much!


Ioana
Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com 
http://www.ioanagandrabur.com/ on iTunes and most online stores.


On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Tim Kilburn kilbur...@gmail.com 
mailto:kilbur...@gmail.com wrote:



Hi,

Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the 
basic answer is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise 
though if you are planning to have the units tethered more or less 
permanently.  Normally, the ethernet connection is a higher 
priority than the wireless one thus once the connection is made, 
you will lose your IP address and most likely lose your Internet 
connection.  There are workarounds for this sort of thing but they 
are not typically VO friendly.


The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on 
your router, could be slightly quicker then going through it as well.


The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your 
other Mac is set up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups 
is not as easy as it appears.  My suggestions for this would be to 
either have some sort of network access storage either through 
your existing router (if it supports it), to use a Time Capsule or 
Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert your other Mac to a 
MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports NAS, that's 
the least expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only $20 
and the most expensive would be the Airport Extreme or Time 
Capsule route.  Just because life is never easy, the less 
expensive routes are not necessarily the easiest methods

Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-11 Thread Ioana Gandrabur
Thanks for all your support,
As we speak the backup is going slowly but surely.
Could anyone of you experts suggest a course of action to try to attempt the 
wired connection with a cable without passing through router?  At the moment I 
have the ethernet connected to both macs without a router but I have a feeling 
that the network is still happening over wifi.

It is very slow for now. 2 days for 125 gigs.

Thanks again,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
stores.

On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Chris Blouch cblo...@aol.com wrote:

 I've had pretty good luck with time machine over wifi. I have an old Mac G4 
 running in the basement with a 500GB drive for time machine backups wired to 
 my wifi router. I then have sharing turned on and mounted that drive on a 
 laptop and told time machine to use it. It seems to back up a lot of the time 
 since I'm back on 802.11G since my Airport died. It was much more reasonable 
 with 802.11N. In other words, if you're patient you might be fine just doing 
 time machine backups over wifi and will have no need of a frankencable setup.
 
 CB
 
 On 11/7/12 12:31 AM, Tim Kilburn wrote:
 Hi,
 
 You are correct in most accounts.  Time Machine will continue from where it 
 left off if all things are equal, meaning that you're using the same Backup 
 location and configuration as well as connection method.  Yes it should be 
 much quicker on future backups.
 
 With respect to the Internet connection being lost when the ethernet cable 
 is connected.  Try going to the System Prefs, in the Network pane.  In the 
 Actions pop-up menu, choose Set Service Order and then drag the WIFI above 
 the Ethernet service.  This should allow the WIFI to maintain its Internet 
 connection but still allow connectivity between computers with the ethernet 
 cable.  Note that should is my favourite word in computer-land so I'm not 
 promising that it will work perfectly.  I do, in my world, use multiple 
 network services but these are usually in a Server environment so your 
 machine may behave differently.
 
 Good luck.
 
 Later...
 
 Tim Kilburn
 Fort McMurray, AB Canada
 
 On 2012-11-06, at 12:50 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Thanks for your detailed response.
 Like you said, it opens up more questiones than it answers.
 
 I have a sighted husband that could help with non VO friendly solutions. 
 Could you mind telling me what those might be?
 
 Also, I am just thinking letting timemachine do its thing although it takes 
 forever. I am thinking that for subsequent bakcups it would be faster since 
 there is less to update. Do any of you know if timemachine can continue 
 backup where it left off if the backup was interrupted? IN this case am I 
 risking corrupted data?
 
 hanks very much!
 
 
 Ioana
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Tim Kilburn kilbur...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the basic 
 answer is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise though if you are 
 planning to have the units tethered more or less 
 permanently.  Normally, the ethernet connection is a higher priority than 
 the wireless one thus once the connection is made, you will lose your IP 
 address and most likely lose your Internet connection.  There are 
 workarounds for this sort of thing but they are not typically VO friendly.
 
 The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on your 
 router, could be slightly quicker then going 
 through it as well.
 
 The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your other Mac 
 is set up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups is not as easy as 
 it appears.  My suggestions for this would be to either have some sort of 
 network access storage either through your existing router (if it supports 
 it), to use a Time Capsule or Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert 
 your other Mac to a MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports 
 NAS, that's the least expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only 
 $20 and the most expensive would be the Airport Extreme or Time Capsule 
 route.  Just because life is never easy, the less expensive routes are not 
 necessarily the easiest methods to configure.
 
 Sorry, probably just gave you more questions than answers.
 
 Later...
 
 Tim Kilburn
 Fort McMurray, AB Canada
 
 On 2012-11-05, at 1:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close 
 to the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable 
 should do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is 
 it slower than passing

Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-11 Thread Jonathan C. Cohn
This will just work on most Macintoshes without any special configurations.  
You might need to turn off wireless, since the two machines will see each other 
over both wireless and direct cable.  I believe that some OS versions will 
prefer the wireless to the wired even though that is not sensible in my opinion.

Also, if both your machines are Apple airDrop cabable then AirDrop provides a 
direct connection rather then going over the router.


Jonathan Cohn
jon.c.c...@gmail.com
(703) 573-6956
http://www.linkedin.com/in/JCCohn




On Nov 5, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Ioana Gandrabur wrote:

 Could you give me more details or point me where I should look up info?
 
 THanks,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Brian Moore bmo...@screenreview.org wrote:
 
 HI.  you can do this with ethernet cable but you will have to statically 
 assign ip addresses and such to both machines I think.
 
 Brian.
 Contact me on skype: brian.moore
 follow me on twitter:
 http://www.twitter.com/bmoore123
 On 05/11/2012 3:47 PM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
 What exactly are you trying to do? Do you just want the two computers 
 hooked together to transfer files or are you trying to connect them both to 
 the internet?
 
 -- 
 Cheryl
 
 May the words of my mouth
 and the meditation of my heart
 be acceptable to You, Lord,
 my rock and my Redeemer.
 (Psalm 19:14 HCSB)
 
 
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close 
 to the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable 
 should do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is 
 it slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-08 Thread Chris Blouch
I've had pretty good luck with time machine over wifi. I have an old Mac 
G4 running in the basement with a 500GB drive for time machine backups 
wired to my wifi router. I then have sharing turned on and mounted that 
drive on a laptop and told time machine to use it. It seems to back up a 
lot of the time since I'm back on 802.11G since my Airport died. It was 
much more reasonable with 802.11N. In other words, if you're patient you 
might be fine just doing time machine backups over wifi and will have no 
need of a frankencable setup.


CB

On 11/7/12 12:31 AM, Tim Kilburn wrote:

Hi,

You are correct in most accounts.  Time Machine will continue from 
where it left off if all things are equal, meaning that you're using 
the same Backup location and configuration as well as connection 
method.  Yes it should be much quicker on future backups.


With respect to the Internet connection being lost when the ethernet 
cable is connected.  Try going to the System Prefs, in the Network 
pane.  In the Actions pop-up menu, choose Set Service Order and then 
drag the WIFI above the Ethernet service.  This should allow the WIFI 
to maintain its Internet connection but still allow connectivity 
between computers with the ethernet cable.  Note that should is my 
favourite word in computer-land so I'm not promising that it will work 
perfectly.  I do, in my world, use multiple network services but these 
are usually in a Server environment so your machine may behave 
differently.


Good luck.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On 2012-11-06, at 12:50 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com 
mailto:igandra...@gmail.com wrote:



Thanks for your detailed response.
Like you said, it opens up more questiones than it answers.

I have a sighted husband that could help with non VO friendly 
solutions. Could you mind telling me what those might be?


Also, I am just thinking letting timemachine do its thing although it 
takes forever. I am thinking that for subsequent bakcups it would be 
faster since there is less to update. Do any of you know if 
timemachine can continue backup where it left off if the backup was 
interrupted? IN this case am I risking corrupted data?


hanks very much!


Ioana
Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com 
http://www.ioanagandrabur.com/ on iTunes and most online stores.


On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Tim Kilburn kilbur...@gmail.com 
mailto:kilbur...@gmail.com wrote:



Hi,

Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the 
basic answer is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise though 
if you are planning to have the units tethered more or less 
permanently.  Normally, the ethernet connection is a higher priority 
than the wireless one thus once the connection is made, you will 
lose your IP address and most likely lose your Internet connection. 
 There are workarounds for this sort of thing but they are not 
typically VO friendly.


The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on 
your router, could be slightly quicker then going through it as well.


The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your other 
Mac is set up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups is not 
as easy as it appears.  My suggestions for this would be to either 
have some sort of network access storage either through your 
existing router (if it supports it), to use a Time Capsule or 
Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert your other Mac to a 
MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports NAS, that's the 
least expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only $20 and 
the most expensive would be the Airport Extreme or Time Capsule 
route.  Just because life is never easy, the less expensive routes 
are not necessarily the easiest methods to configure.


Sorry, probably just gave you more questions than answers.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On 2012-11-05, at 1:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com 
mailto:igandra...@gmail.com wrote:



Hi,

Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired 
network directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from 
both to be close to the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just 
connecting with a cable should do it since I did this with pc for 
migration assistent.
If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works 
and is it slower than passing through a router?


Thanks for your help.

Best,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com 
http://www.ioanagandrabur.com/ on iTunes and most online stores.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to 
macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 

Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-06 Thread Ioana Gandrabur
Thanks for your detailed response.
Like you said, it opens up more questiones than it answers.

I have a sighted husband that could help with non VO friendly solutions. Could 
you mind telling me what those might be?

Also, I am just thinking letting timemachine do its thing although it takes 
forever. I am thinking that for subsequent bakcups it would be faster since 
there is less to update. Do any of you know if timemachine can continue backup 
where it left off if the backup was interrupted? IN this case am I risking 
corrupted data?

hanks very much!


Ioana
Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
stores.

On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Tim Kilburn kilbur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the basic 
 answer is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise though if you are 
 planning to have the units tethered more or less permanently.  Normally, the 
 ethernet connection is a higher priority than the wireless one thus once the 
 connection is made, you will lose your IP address and most likely lose your 
 Internet connection.  There are workarounds for this sort of thing but they 
 are not typically VO friendly.
 
 The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on your 
 router, could be slightly quicker then going through it as well.
 
 The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your other Mac is 
 set up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups is not as easy as it 
 appears.  My suggestions for this would be to either have some sort of 
 network access storage either through your existing router (if it supports 
 it), to use a Time Capsule or Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert 
 your other Mac to a MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports NAS, 
 that's the least expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only $20 and 
 the most expensive would be the Airport Extreme or Time Capsule route.  Just 
 because life is never easy, the less expensive routes are not necessarily the 
 easiest methods to configure.
 
 Sorry, probably just gave you more questions than answers.
 
 Later...
 
 Tim Kilburn
 Fort McMurray, AB Canada
 
 On 2012-11-05, at 1:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable should 
 do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-06 Thread Tim Kilburn
Hi,

You are correct in most accounts.  Time Machine will continue from where it 
left off if all things are equal, meaning that you're using the same Backup 
location and configuration as well as connection method.  Yes it should be much 
quicker on future backups.

With respect to the Internet connection being lost when the ethernet cable is 
connected.  Try going to the System Prefs, in the Network pane.  In the Actions 
pop-up menu, choose Set Service Order and then drag the WIFI above the 
Ethernet service.  This should allow the WIFI to maintain its Internet 
connection but still allow connectivity between computers with the ethernet 
cable.  Note that should is my favourite word in computer-land so I'm not 
promising that it will work perfectly.  I do, in my world, use multiple network 
services but these are usually in a Server environment so your machine may 
behave differently.

Good luck.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On 2012-11-06, at 12:50 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for your detailed response.
 Like you said, it opens up more questiones than it answers.
 
 I have a sighted husband that could help with non VO friendly solutions. 
 Could you mind telling me what those might be?
 
 Also, I am just thinking letting timemachine do its thing although it takes 
 forever. I am thinking that for subsequent bakcups it would be faster since 
 there is less to update. Do any of you know if timemachine can continue 
 backup where it left off if the backup was interrupted? IN this case am I 
 risking corrupted data?
 
 hanks very much!
 
 
 Ioana
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Tim Kilburn kilbur...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the basic 
 answer is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise though if you are 
 planning to have the units tethered more or less permanently.  Normally, the 
 ethernet connection is a higher priority than the wireless one thus once the 
 connection is made, you will lose your IP address and most likely lose your 
 Internet connection.  There are workarounds for this sort of thing but they 
 are not typically VO friendly.
 
 The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on your 
 router, could be slightly quicker then going through it as well.
 
 The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your other Mac is 
 set up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups is not as easy as it 
 appears.  My suggestions for this would be to either have some sort of 
 network access storage either through your existing router (if it supports 
 it), to use a Time Capsule or Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert 
 your other Mac to a MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports NAS, 
 that's the least expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only $20 
 and the most expensive would be the Airport Extreme or Time Capsule route.  
 Just because life is never easy, the less expensive routes are not 
 necessarily the easiest methods to configure.
 
 Sorry, probably just gave you more questions than answers.
 
 Later...
 
 Tim Kilburn
 Fort McMurray, AB Canada
 
 On 2012-11-05, at 1:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable 
 should do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You 

without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Ioana Gandrabur
Hi,

Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network directly 
with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to the dsl plug 
on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable should do it since I 
did this with pc for migration assistent. 
If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
slower than passing through a router?

Thanks for your help.

Best,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
stores.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Cheryl Homiak
What exactly are you trying to do? Do you just want the two computers hooked 
together to transfer files or are you trying to connect them both to the 
internet?

-- 
Cheryl

May the words of my mouth
and the meditation of my heart
be acceptable to You, Lord,
my rock and my Redeemer.
(Psalm 19:14 HCSB)



On Nov 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable should 
 do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Brian Moore
HI.  you can do this with ethernet cable but you will have to statically 
assign ip addresses and such to both machines I think.


Brian.

Contact me on skype: brian.moore
follow me on twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/bmoore123

On 05/11/2012 3:47 PM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
What exactly are you trying to do? Do you just want the two computers 
hooked together to transfer files or are you trying to connect them 
both to the internet?


--
Cheryl

May the words of my mouth
and the meditation of my heart
be acceptable to You, Lord,
my rock and my Redeemer.
(Psalm 19:14 HCSB)



On Nov 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com 
mailto:igandra...@gmail.com wrote:



Hi,

Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be 
close to the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting 
with a cable should do it since I did this with pc for migration 
assistent.
If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and 
is it slower than passing through a router?


Thanks for your help.

Best,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com 
http://www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online stores.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups MacVisionaries group.

To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Ioana Gandrabur
Just to transfer files so I can use a shared drive for time machine for them. I 
would like to access internet via wireless that is provided by my router.

THanks for the question and advice.

Best,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
stores.

On Nov 5, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Cheryl Homiak cahom...@gmail.com wrote:

 What exactly are you trying to do? Do you just want the two computers hooked 
 together to transfer files or are you trying to connect them both to the 
 internet?
 
 -- 
 Cheryl
 
 May the words of my mouth
 and the meditation of my heart
 be acceptable to You, Lord,
 my rock and my Redeemer.
 (Psalm 19:14 HCSB)
 
 
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable should 
 do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Ioana Gandrabur
Could you give me more details or point me where I should look up info?

THanks,

Ioana

Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
stores.

On Nov 5, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Brian Moore bmo...@screenreview.org wrote:

 HI.  you can do this with ethernet cable but you will have to statically 
 assign ip addresses and such to both machines I think.
 
 Brian.
 Contact me on skype: brian.moore
 follow me on twitter:
 http://www.twitter.com/bmoore123
 On 05/11/2012 3:47 PM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
 What exactly are you trying to do? Do you just want the two computers hooked 
 together to transfer files or are you trying to connect them both to the 
 internet?
 
 -- 
 Cheryl
 
 May the words of my mouth
 and the meditation of my heart
 be acceptable to You, Lord,
 my rock and my Redeemer.
 (Psalm 19:14 HCSB)
 
 
 
 On Nov 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable 
 should do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.



Re: without passing through router?

2012-11-05 Thread Tim Kilburn
Hi,

Migration Assistant is a different kettle of fish.  Although, the basic answer 
is yes, sort of.  Some complications will arise though if you are planning to 
have the units tethered more or less permanently.  Normally, the ethernet 
connection is a higher priority than the wireless one thus once the connection 
is made, you will lose your IP address and most likely lose your Internet 
connection.  There are workarounds for this sort of thing but they are not 
typically VO friendly.

The connection speed should be quicker than WIFI and depending on your router, 
could be slightly quicker then going through it as well.

The problem I see with your design though is that, unless your other Mac is set 
up as a server, using it for Time Machine backups is not as easy as it appears. 
 My suggestions for this would be to either have some sort of network access 
storage either through your existing router (if it supports it), to use a Time 
Capsule or Airport Extreme with external HD, or convert your other Mac to a 
MacOS Server.  Financially, if your router supports NAS, that's the least 
expensive route, purchasing the MacOS Server is only $20 and the most expensive 
would be the Airport Extreme or Time Capsule route.  Just because life is never 
easy, the less expensive routes are not necessarily the easiest methods to 
configure.

Sorry, probably just gave you more questions than answers.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On 2012-11-05, at 1:40 PM, Ioana Gandrabur igandra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Just wondering if it is possible to connect 2 macs on a wired network 
 directly with a cable. THe router is very far away from both to be close to 
 the dsl plug on the wall. I thought that just connecting with a cable should 
 do it since I did this with pc for migration assistent. 
 If it is indeed possible, how do I make sure the connection works and is it 
 slower than passing through a router?
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 Best,
 
 Ioana
 
 Please check out my cd on www.ioanagandrabur.com on iTunes and most online 
 stores.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 MacVisionaries group.
 To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MacVisionaries group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.