Re: Garage project takeover

2010-04-28 Thread Aniello Del Sorbo
On 28 April 2010 09:29, Javier S. Pedro  wrote:
> Sorry for bumping this again, but...
>

> Niels Breet wrote:
>> The project is completely empty and doesn't seem to be used since it has
>> been created on 2007-12-08.
>>
>> I can set you as admin for that project as you seem to be a lot more
>> active than the current admin.
>>
>> I'd like to get an OK from the council so we all agree on this. If there
>> had been data in the project it was a more difficult decision, but now
>> it seems completely empty.
>
> Two months have passed -- time for takeover? If the original admin comes
> back, I'll give him the project. It's not like I am 100% active either.
>
> --
> Javier
>

He had two months to reply.
He clearly has abandoned the project, so I am for the takeover.
If my word is worth a bit more than 2c, that is :)

Aniello
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-04-28 Thread Javier S. Pedro
Sorry for bumping this again, but...

Niels Breet wrote:
> The project is completely empty and doesn't seem to be used since it has
> been created on 2007-12-08.
> 
> I can set you as admin for that project as you seem to be a lot more
> active than the current admin.
> 
> I'd like to get an OK from the council so we all agree on this. If there
> had been data in the project it was a more difficult decision, but now
> it seems completely empty.

Two months have passed -- time for takeover? If the original admin comes 
back, I'll give him the project. It's not like I am 100% active either.

-- 
Javier

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-02-25 Thread Javier S. Pedro
Graham Cobb wrote:
> I suggest a "formal" email from Niels, in the name of the council,
> notifying him that someone else wants to take over his project and that
> the council agrees.
> 
> As the project is currently empty, and so nothing will be lost, I would
> give him 1 more week to respond to that email.

Note that I clicked Garage's "be a maintainer" link a few months ago, as 
any Garage admin would be able to tell (I guess ;P).

But I agree with the general idea -- the first email could get lost in some
spam filter. Garage has no ability to "resend" it, so I sent him an email
from my own mail address but he may be ignoring that (spambox account
 with aggressive filtering?).

Ideally, could we send him a mail from some "official" @maemo.org address?

-- 
Javier

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-02-24 Thread Niels Breet
> If renaming is possible would be a better option IMO.
>

Unfortunately gforge doesn't let you rename projects as lists, scm etc are
also linked to it.

>
> Best regards,
>
>
> --
> Valério Valério
>
>
> http://www.valeriovalerio.org

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-02-24 Thread Valerio Valerio
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Graham Cobb

> wrote:

> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 08:12:05 Niels Breet wrote:
> > I'd like to get an OK from the council so we all agree on this. If there
> > had been data in the project it was a more difficult decision, but now it
> > seems completely empty.
>
> I agree that this is probably the correct thing to do.  However, I would
> like
> to make sure the current admin has a fair chance to object.  After all,
> maybe
> he is on holiday?
>
> I suggest a "formal" email from Niels, in the name of the council,
> notifying
> him that someone else wants to take over his project and that the council
> agrees.
>
> As the project is currently empty, and so nothing will be lost, I would
> give
> him 1 more week to respond to that email.
>

Yup, agree with these rules, is not the first time that someone wants to
takeover a garage project, can't recall correctly who asked me the same
thing, but that person got a reply from the 'old' administrator.

>
> If the project had content but seemed to be abandonned I would say the
> process
> should be to give him 2 weeks to respond, then archive the project before
> handing it over (is there a way to rename an existing project so it could
> be
> named "-old" or something?).
>

If renaming is possible would be a better option IMO.

Best regards,

-- 
Valério Valério

http://www.valeriovalerio.org


>
> Graham
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-02-24 Thread Graham Cobb
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 08:12:05 Niels Breet wrote:
> I'd like to get an OK from the council so we all agree on this. If there
> had been data in the project it was a more difficult decision, but now it
> seems completely empty.

I agree that this is probably the correct thing to do.  However, I would like 
to make sure the current admin has a fair chance to object.  After all, maybe 
he is on holiday?

I suggest a "formal" email from Niels, in the name of the council, notifying 
him that someone else wants to take over his project and that the council 
agrees.

As the project is currently empty, and so nothing will be lost, I would give 
him 1 more week to respond to that email.  

If the project had content but seemed to be abandonned I would say the process 
should be to give him 2 weeks to respond, then archive the project before 
handing it over (is there a way to rename an existing project so it could be 
named "-old" or something?).

Graham
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Garage project takeover

2010-02-24 Thread Niels Breet
> Hello,
Hi,
>
> I am currently doing some maintainance work on DOSBox for Maemo (and
> I am the author of the current package in -devel). In order to fulfill
> the extras QA bugtracker requeriment and my own need for a VCS repo, I
> considered registering a new project in Garage, but found that the project
> was already registered.
>
> Quite a few months ago I contacted the maintainer, but he hasn't answered
> yet, and the Garage interface won't let me spam him again until he accepts
> or declines the current request. So, a week ago, I sent him an email, with
>  still no reply.
>
> I could register a "dosbox2" project, or just ignore Garage and go
> straight to a b.m.o component and a gitorius project, but since the Garage
> project already exists and is virtually empty, I'd like to know if there's
> any policy about takeover of empty/abandoned Garage projects by "new
> maintainers", or to kickstart discussions about one if it does not exist
> yet.
>

The project is completely empty and doesn't seem to be used since it has
been created on 2007-12-08.

I can set you as admin for that project as you seem to be a lot more
active than the current admin.

I'd like to get an OK from the council so we all agree on this. If there
had been data in the project it was a more difficult decision, but now it
seems completely empty.

A policy on this kind of takeovers doesn't exist, but I guess common sense
and communication would help solve issues like this.

> DOSBox garage link: https://garage.maemo.org/projects/dosbox
>
>
> --
> Javier
>
>

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Garage project takeover

2010-02-23 Thread Javier S. Pedro
Hello,

I am currently doing some maintainance work on DOSBox for Maemo (and
I am the author of the current package in -devel). In order to fulfill
the extras QA bugtracker requeriment and my own need for a VCS repo, 
I considered registering a new project in Garage, but found that the
project was already registered.

Quite a few months ago I contacted the maintainer, but he hasn't answered yet,
and the Garage interface won't let me spam him again until he accepts or 
declines the current request. So, a week ago, I sent him an email, with
still no reply. 

I could register a "dosbox2" project, or just ignore Garage and go straight to
a b.m.o component and a gitorius project, but since the Garage project already
exists and is virtually empty, I'd like to know if there's any policy about 
takeover of empty/abandoned Garage projects by "new maintainers", or to 
kickstart discussions about one if it does not exist yet.

DOSBox garage link: https://garage.maemo.org/projects/dosbox

-- 
Javier

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers