Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-29 Thread Noel Butler via mailop

On 29/04/2021 20:05, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:


Dnia 29.04.2021 o godz. 13:04:55 Noel Butler via mailop pisze:


nobody, but nobody, is too big to block to protect my users.


And what if your users because of being unable to communicate with 
Google
users (which is roughly equal to "almost everyone" for an average user) 
will

switch to Google and move their email there?

And BTW. in my opinion that's exactly what Google wants - that everyone 
uses

their services and nobody else's.

So just in order to stop people moving to GGogle we should be able to
communicate with Google :)


I have no doubt they rather people use their service so they can scan 
and scam them, but I don't and wont play their games, if the rest of you 
are too gutless to stand up the bullies thats more work for you, 
answering irate clients who want the spam to stop, how does that go down 
you telling them google is too big to block in your eyes - that, would 
be a faster way to lose clients.


Think what we will about Microsoft, even I give them credit in this 
area, they do a pretty good job when it comes to dealing with abusers on 
their network, no reason google can't.


--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged 
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to 
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate 
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.   
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then 
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. 
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost 
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-29 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 29.04.2021 o godz. 13:04:55 Noel Butler via mailop pisze:
> 
> nobody, but nobody, is too big to block to protect my users.

And what if your users because of being unable to communicate with Google
users (which is roughly equal to "almost everyone" for an average user) will
switch to Google and move their email there?

And BTW. in my opinion that's exactly what Google wants - that everyone uses
their services and nobody else's.

So just in order to stop people moving to GGogle we should be able to
communicate with Google :)
-- 
Regards,
   Jaroslaw Rafa
   r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-28 Thread Noel Butler via mailop

On 28/04/2021 17:05, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:


Dnia 28.04.2021 o godz. 10:19:17 Noel Butler via mailop pisze:


What's so hard about 1 ?

What do we do with any S.P. that emits tonnes of crap, we block
them, often outright, nothing hard about that.

It shouldn't matter how big a company is, it certainly didn't 20
years ago when most people here who were around at the time would
have blocked AOL
for the exact same thing, yet people are scared to block the
freemailers these days, why, it's those actions that force said
companies to pull their finger out of their arse and clean up their
network, if they don't, well, like i said,  AOL, they become
irrelevant.


From "normal" people (ie. not email-related professionals like on this
list) that I correspond with, about 70% have email addresses on Gmail. 
There
are also numerous companies that use Gsuite for their work email (and 
among

them are really big corporations, like my employer). The popularity of
smartphones and mobile applications has a big impact on this. So 
blocking
Google is like blocking 70% or more of your possible correspondents. If 
you
can afford this, then good luck, but most people cannot. Google just 
grew

too big and for a small email operator (and almost everyone is small
compared to Google) blocking Google will hurt themselves more than it 
will

hurt Google.


you see, this is EXACTLY what I am talking about

it is EXACTLY what google counts on and google does S F A about it.

I've blocked them in the past yes, I have no hesitation in doing so 
again.


nobody, but nobody, is too big to block to protect my users.

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged 
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to 
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate 
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.   
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then 
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. 
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost 
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 28.04.2021 o godz. 10:19:17 Noel Butler via mailop pisze:
> 
> What's so hard about 1 ?
> 
> What do we do with any S.P. that emits tonnes of crap, we block
> them, often outright, nothing hard about that.
> 
> It shouldn't matter how big a company is, it certainly didn't 20
> years ago when most people here who were around at the time would
> have blocked AOL
> for the exact same thing, yet people are scared to block the
> freemailers these days, why, it's those actions that force said
> companies to pull their finger out of their arse and clean up their
> network, if they don't, well, like i said,  AOL, they become
> irrelevant.

From "normal" people (ie. not email-related professionals like on this
list) that I correspond with, about 70% have email addresses on Gmail. There
are also numerous companies that use Gsuite for their work email (and among
them are really big corporations, like my employer). The popularity of
smartphones and mobile applications has a big impact on this. So blocking
Google is like blocking 70% or more of your possible correspondents. If you
can afford this, then good luck, but most people cannot. Google just grew
too big and for a small email operator (and almost everyone is small
compared to Google) blocking Google will hurt themselves more than it will
hurt Google.
-- 
Regards,
   Jaroslaw Rafa
   r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-27 Thread Noel Butler via mailop

On 28/04/2021 01:31, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:


(1) sent from legit Google mail servers

(2) the spammer's "payload URL" in the body of the message - is content 
is hosted at storage[.]googleapis[.]com servers


(3) Those links are staying "live" for many days (possibly 
weeks/months?)


This combination (1 & 2) makes them difficult to block - especially for 
small and medium sized hosters who don't have as much expertise and 
resources to deal with this.


What's so hard about 1 ?

What do we do with any S.P. that emits tonnes of crap, we block them, 
often outright, nothing hard about that.


It shouldn't matter how big a company is, it certainly didn't 20 years 
ago when most people here who were around at the time would have blocked 
AOL
for the exact same thing, yet people are scared to block the freemailers 
these days, why, it's those actions that force said companies to pull 
their finger out of their arse and clean up their network, if they 
don't, well, like i said,  AOL, they become irrelevant.


As for 2, blocking them is easy in even the most basic of systems like 
milter-regex, or even spamassassin et al


Lastly for 3, that makes 1 even more justifiable.

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged 
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to 
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate 
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.   
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then 
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. 
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost 
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-27 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop

On 2021-04-27 8:32 a.m., Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:

Am 27.04.21 um 17:00 schrieb Michael Peddemors via mailop:

Well, in better news, I get my vaccine shot tomorrow ;)

Great!


Havent' posted one of these in a while, but last couple of weeks has spam 
auditors very busy..

* Huge amounts of reports from Azure IP(s), Hit and Run

(If you are seeing the same, and frustrated, reach out, we can post one days 
report, but hundreds of IP(s) every day
triggering invalid rate limiter reports, we call it hit and run, as the PTR's 
are usually gone shortly after the
attacks, or not present at all. Really surprised that with the amount of IP(s) 
involved, this doesn't set off a lot of
bell's at MS. Combination of RATS-AZURE and rDNS naming patterns catch this 
pretty easily though.  However, they
volume enough to really fill someone's logs and use valuable resources)


MS seems to be actively ignoring the problem. They have gotten a couple hundred 
reports from me (mostly automated, I
must admit). No reaction, not even a complaint that I'm flooding them with 
abuse reports. The only plausible explanation
is that they're employing Dave Null as their sole abuse desk worker.

To mitigate the log problem, I've resorted to putting the containing /21 for 
every cloudapp.azure.com spam into the
iptables list. Works like a charm.

Cheers,
Hans-Martin



If you wish to do the same, with less pain, they do post all the AZURE 
IP(s) online, put them all into an 'ipset' ;)


But actually, (albeit I have heard from 'those in the know' that 
accepting email from any IP in the Azure space is probably risky) there 
COULD be a legitimate operator standing up an email server on that IP 
Space. I know, you can of course 'whitelist' when it happens, but as per 
my original post and suggestion.. better to at least do 'If on Azure IP 
space AND it has a generic or missing PTR record, reject it as early as 
possible'


Course that might not last long..

Anyone see the noise from..

20.52.48.27  10   j.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.92   10   k.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.47.204  11   c.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.47.232  12   d.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.109  11   l.safemaskspro.com
20.52.48.25   1   f.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.301   h.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.341   i.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.511   m.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.622   n.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.48.672   o.safemaskspro.com
13.74.217.163 2   safempro.us
13.79.192.184 1   safempro.us
13.79.199.170 1   safempro.us
13.79.216.163 1   safempro.us
   13.79.216.166  3   safempro.us
   13.79.216.169  1   safempro.us
   13.79.216.196  1   safempro.us
13.79.75.91   2   safempro.us
23.100.53.194 1   safempro.us
23.101.56.113 1   safempro.us
40.113.6.138  1   safempro.us
40.115.117.1631   safempro.us
40.69.83.170  1   safempro.us
40.69.89.41   2   safempro.us
   40.69.89.641   safempro.us
   40.69.89.101   1   safempro.us
52.148.139.1121   safempro.us
52.148.142.87 1   safempro.us
52.148.177.89 1   safempro.us
52.148.178.1641   safempro.us
52.148.182.1531   safempro.us
52.149.14.141 1   safempro.us
   52.149.14.167  1   safempro.us
52.149.41.69  2   safempro.us
52.158.230.58 1   safempro.us
52.183.113.1511   safempro.us
52.233.74.143 2   safempro.us
52.233.78.184 1   safempro.us
20.52.234.40  1   m.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.234.47   1   n.safemaskspro.com
   20.52.234.103  2   k.safemaskspro.com



--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."

Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_

Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-27 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop

On 2021-04-27 8:31 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:

On 4/27/2021 11:00 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:

New Google Groups style spam outbreak..



Many of them (or all of them?) are doing the following:

(1) sent from legit Google mail servers

(2) the spammer's "payload URL" in the body of the message - is content 
is hosted at *storage[.]googleapis[.]com* servers


(3) Those links are staying "live" for many days (possibly weeks/months?)

This combination (1 & 2) makes them difficult to block - especially for 
small and medium sized hosters who don't have as much expertise and 
resources to deal with this. Not to make excuses for such organizations' 
lack of abilities or resources/time - but they shouldn't be forced to 
expend such resources on dealing with "friendly fire" from google's 
network. If Google were a small startup doing this right now, their IPs 
and domains would all get onto anti-spam lists, they'd be put out of 
business, and we'd "call it a day"! And then I also can't help but 
wonder - how many of those smaller email hosters just lost business 
email hosting customers this month to Google G-Suite - due to the 
customers' frustration over these SAME spams getting to the inbox? See 
the problem here?


Also, this storage[.]googleapis[.]com spam has been happening for a long 
time - but they were sent from the spammers' own IP space (or other 
irrelevant IP space) - now they suddenly figured out a way to get these 
spams to be sent from Google MTAs.


--
Rob McEwen, invaluement



Yes, while in general it has been happening for a while (for a period we 
even started blocking all Google Groups mail as a shot over their bow, 
however we went back to 'filtering' it as likely spam, there were legit 
users affected) this looks to be a new way to send Google list spam, and 
not the traditional groups spamming methods we have seen over the last year.




--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."

Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-27 Thread Rob McEwen via mailop

On 4/27/2021 11:00 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:

New Google Groups style spam outbreak..



Many of them (or all of them?) are doing the following:

(1) sent from legit Google mail servers

(2) the spammer's "payload URL" in the body of the message - is content 
is hosted at *storage[.]googleapis[.]com* servers


(3) Those links are staying "live" for many days (possibly weeks/months?)

This combination (1 & 2) makes them difficult to block - especially for 
small and medium sized hosters who don't have as much expertise and 
resources to deal with this. Not to make excuses for such organizations' 
lack of abilities or resources/time - but they shouldn't be forced to 
expend such resources on dealing with "friendly fire" from google's 
network. If Google were a small startup doing this right now, their IPs 
and domains would all get onto anti-spam lists, they'd be put out of 
business, and we'd "call it a day"! And then I also can't help but 
wonder - how many of those smaller email hosters just lost business 
email hosting customers this month to Google G-Suite - due to the 
customers' frustration over these SAME spams getting to the inbox? See 
the problem here?


Also, this storage[.]googleapis[.]com spam has been happening for a long 
time - but they were sent from the spammers' own IP space (or other 
irrelevant IP space) - now they suddenly figured out a way to get these 
spams to be sent from Google MTAs.


--
Rob McEwen, invaluement

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] [INFORMATION] What's happening in the world of spam/email abuse update

2021-04-27 Thread Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
Am 27.04.21 um 17:00 schrieb Michael Peddemors via mailop:
> Well, in better news, I get my vaccine shot tomorrow ;)
Great!
>
> Havent' posted one of these in a while, but last couple of weeks has spam 
> auditors very busy..
>
> * Huge amounts of reports from Azure IP(s), Hit and Run
>
> (If you are seeing the same, and frustrated, reach out, we can post one days 
> report, but hundreds of IP(s) every day
> triggering invalid rate limiter reports, we call it hit and run, as the PTR's 
> are usually gone shortly after the
> attacks, or not present at all. Really surprised that with the amount of 
> IP(s) involved, this doesn't set off a lot of
> bell's at MS. Combination of RATS-AZURE and rDNS naming patterns catch this 
> pretty easily though.  However, they
> volume enough to really fill someone's logs and use valuable resources) 

MS seems to be actively ignoring the problem. They have gotten a couple hundred 
reports from me (mostly automated, I
must admit). No reaction, not even a complaint that I'm flooding them with 
abuse reports. The only plausible explanation
is that they're employing Dave Null as their sole abuse desk worker.

To mitigate the log problem, I've resorted to putting the containing /21 for 
every cloudapp.azure.com spam into the
iptables list. Works like a charm.

Cheers,
Hans-Martin

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop