Re: MI Aerial Photography

2000-02-03 Thread Nigel James

Dave,

With the raster image open as a table, open the Table menu, then go to 
Raster - Adjust Image Styles. You can then tweak the brightness and 
contrast.

regards

Nigel

On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:15:43 - David Eagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have some aerial photography onto which I am overlaying other 
 data...When I print it out though the photos are very dark. Is there 
 any way within the mapinfo environment that I can adjust the 
 brightness/contrast of these photos?
 
 I have tried exporting the window as numerous file types and 
 altering this in paint programmes which is sucessful but when I do 
 this the quality of the picture is degraded and overlaid text 
 becomes blocky...
 
 Any Ideas would be welcome...
 Thanks, Dave
 
 _
 David A. Eagle (Graduate Analyst).
 WS Atkins Consultants - East Anglia
 Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA.
 Tel: (01223) 276002, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Nigel N James
Map Room
Bodleian Library
Broad St
Oxford
OX1  3BG
UK
tel : +44 1865 277013
fax: +44 1865 277139 
Visit the Map Room Home Page at: http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/guides/maps/

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Aerial Photography

2000-02-02 Thread David Eagle

I have some aerial photography onto which I am overlaying other 
data...When I print it out though the photos are very dark. Is there 
any way within the mapinfo environment that I can adjust the 
brightness/contrast of these photos?

I have tried exporting the window as numerous file types and 
altering this in paint programmes which is sucessful but when I do 
this the quality of the picture is degraded and overlaid text 
becomes blocky...

Any Ideas would be welcome...
Thanks, Dave

_
David A. Eagle (Graduate Analyst).
WS Atkins Consultants - East Anglia
Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA.
Tel: (01223) 276002, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Aerial Photography

2000-02-02 Thread Matthews, Mark

use the "Table, Raster, Adjust Image Styles ..." menu, select the image to
modify, and then you can change the contrast and brightness

-Original Message-
From: David Eagle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MI Aerial Photography


I have some aerial photography onto which I am overlaying other 
data...When I print it out though the photos are very dark. Is there 
any way within the mapinfo environment that I can adjust the 
brightness/contrast of these photos?

I have tried exporting the window as numerous file types and 
altering this in paint programmes which is sucessful but when I do 
this the quality of the picture is degraded and overlaid text 
becomes blocky...

Any Ideas would be welcome...
Thanks, Dave

_
David A. Eagle (Graduate Analyst).
WS Atkins Consultants - East Anglia
Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA.
Tel: (01223) 276002, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage

1999-07-15 Thread Clifford J. Mugnier

Steven,

Who is doing the photogrammetry?  Is your photogrammetrist 
doing "softcopy" aerotriangulation or are they using 
analytical plotters?  Do you intend to use only rectified 
imagery or are you going for orthophotos?  What type of 
terrain are you working in?  Is this urban, rural, dessert, 
forest, what?  What do you need to resolve?  Are you having 
your imagery scanned by a professional mapping company that 
uses a calibrated photogrammetric scanner?  What calibrated 
focal length are you using from what altitude?  What is the 
AWAR - Area Weighted Average Resolution of the mapping 
camera?  Did it have IMC - Image Motion Compensation?  Was 
it turned on for the flight?  What is the level of image 
smear?  Who wrote the specifications for the photography? 
 Is this color, color infrared, or panchromatic?

Is this a professional mapping project, or is some 
secretary/typist going to stick paper prints into an 
office-grade HP scanjet?

Just a detail or two would help ...

Clifford J. Mugnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Topographic Engineering Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS
New Orleans, Louisiana  70148

Voice and Facsimilie: (504) 280-7095

On Wednesday, 14 July, 1999 9:15 PM, Steven Heapy 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 Our Council has just had some aerial photography flown at
 1:5000 and are
 investigating at what DPI we should have this scanned at
 ie 600 or 1200
 DPI

 We are currently testing both, obviously the 1200 
requires
 more storage
 and cost but gives an improved image on the screen and
 prints better.
 However both images that are printed through MapInfo 5.5
 in the layout
 seem to loose a fair amount of quality compared to being
 printed in say
 Photo Editor.

 Also has anyone used and printed images compressed with 
Mr
 Sid over a NT
 network.

 All comments, sugestions and ideas regarding DPI
 (resolution), storage
 and printing would be appreciate

 Regards
 Steve
 
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage

1999-07-15 Thread Landis, Bill @ Phoenix

Remote sensing details aside, sounds like you are running into the dreaded
MI raster resampling feature.  MI can't print 24 bit color at 24 bit to
postscript printers.  It resamples the raster to 8 bit to print.  That isn't
the problem.  The problem is that it uses the Windows color pallet for the
resample, thus your images look like they are at a low resolution, when in
reality they do not have enough colors to properly represent the image.

Scan your images at 1200 dpi, but if you are going to print them in MI then
you will have to resample them to 8 bit yourself with Photo Editor.  Just
make sure that when you resample them you have PE create an optimized
pallet.  The images will degrade slightly, but most will not be able to
distinguish the difference.

You are going to run into the same problem with Mr. Sid files.  That is why
I do not believe that Mr. Sid is a good solution for MI.  Besides ER Mapper
will give you a better compression tool for free and ER Mapper's format has
plug-ins for MI, AV, AutoCAD, PhotoShop and other apps.  But even with ER
Mapper you will run into a printing problem.

There is a company, Engineering Mapping Solutions that has a good solution.
Their product EMSView is a stand alone viewer that will display your
compressed images as a single image and export them out to all major GIS
apps in 24, 16 and 8 bit TIFFs (world and tab files included).  They have
even developed a mbx that will allow you to import an image from within MI.
Their number is (602) 870-7811.

Hope this helps,

Bill Landis...
Information Management Director, Global Mapping Services
CB Richard Ellis
P 602 735 5233  F 602 735 5655
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished."  - unknown

-Original Message-
From:   Steven Heapy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, July 14, 1999 7:15 PM
To: 'MapInfo-L'
Subject:    MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage

Our Council has just had some aerial photography flown at
1:5000 and are
investigating at what DPI we should have this scanned at ie
600 or 1200
DPI   

We are currently testing both, obviously the 1200 requires
more storage
and cost but gives an improved image on the screen and
prints better.
However both images that are printed through MapInfo 5.5 in
the layout
seem to loose a fair amount of quality compared to being
printed in say
Photo Editor.

Also has anyone used and printed images compressed with Mr
Sid over a NT
network.

All comments, sugestions and ideas regarding DPI
(resolution), storage
and printing would be appreciate

Regards
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MI Aerial Photography - Storage

1999-07-15 Thread Bob Hudson

The storage problem may be easier- how about burning them onto a CD-Rom?
BH

-Original Message-
From: Landis, Bill @ Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MapInfo Mail List 1 (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, 16 July 1999 1:50
Subject: RE: MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage


Remote sensing details aside, sounds like you are running into the dreaded
MI raster resampling feature.  MI can't print 24 bit color at 24 bit to
postscript printers.  It resamples the raster to 8 bit to print.  That
isn't
the problem.  The problem is that it uses the Windows color pallet for the
resample, thus your images look like they are at a low resolution, when in
reality they do not have enough colors to properly represent the image.

Scan your images at 1200 dpi, but if you are going to print them in MI then
you will have to resample them to 8 bit yourself with Photo Editor.  Just
make sure that when you resample them you have PE create an optimized
pallet.  The images will degrade slightly, but most will not be able to
distinguish the difference.

You are going to run into the same problem with Mr. Sid files.  That is why
I do not believe that Mr. Sid is a good solution for MI.  Besides ER Mapper
will give you a better compression tool for free and ER Mapper's format has
plug-ins for MI, AV, AutoCAD, PhotoShop and other apps.  But even with ER
Mapper you will run into a printing problem.

There is a company, Engineering Mapping Solutions that has a good solution.
Their product EMSView is a stand alone viewer that will display your
compressed images as a single image and export them out to all major GIS
apps in 24, 16 and 8 bit TIFFs (world and tab files included).  They have
even developed a mbx that will allow you to import an image from within MI.
Their number is (602) 870-7811.

Hope this helps,

Bill Landis...
Information Management Director, Global Mapping Services
CB Richard Ellis
P 602 735 5233  F 602 735 5655
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished."  - unknown

 -Original Message-
 From: Steven Heapy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 7:15 PM
 To: 'MapInfo-L'
 Subject: MI Aerial Photography - Printing and Storage

 Our Council has just had some aerial photography flown at
1:5000 and are
 investigating at what DPI we should have this scanned at ie
600 or 1200
 DPI

 We are currently testing both, obviously the 1200 requires
more storage
 and cost but gives an improved image on the screen and
prints better.
 However both images that are printed through MapInfo 5.5 in
the layout
 seem to loose a fair amount of quality compared to being
printed in say
 Photo Editor.

 Also has anyone used and printed images compressed with Mr
Sid over a NT
 network.

 All comments, sugestions and ideas regarding DPI
(resolution), storage
 and printing would be appreciate

 Regards
 Steve

--
 To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
 "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]