Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-27 Thread wb


Eric Woudenberg wrote:

 Stainless Steel Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  No.  If you could take two Sony MZ-R1 units and put an ATRAC 4.5 ASIC in
  one of them, and record something on a Sharp MS-722, and play that disc
  back in both Sony units, both Sony units will sound identical.  The ATRAC
  version in the player has no effect on playback quality.
 
  Differences in playback arise primarilly from differences in ATRAC tuning.

 It is my understanding that the numerical accuracy of the decode side
 of ATRAC has improved over the years. It is still possible that you
 are correct, in that the changes may be near the limit of audibility.

Hi,

BTW, does anybody know why ATRAC Version 1 sounded so bad (though not for me!)
and why ATRAC Version 2 has improved a lot?

Another BTW: on eBay, there are really nice pictures about the Sony DKR-700
Digital Still Recorder and the Sony DPA-300 Digital Still Recorder, both old, I
know.

see  http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=392004386
and  http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=392008506

I thought they are nice for the MDCP archive!

wolfgang


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-27 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Eric Woudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Thu, 27 Jul 2000
| It is my understanding that the numerical accuracy of the decode side
| of ATRAC has improved over the years.

The decoder in the MZ-R1 is identical to the decoder in the other MZ-R1.
All that has been changed is the encoder, which is not in the playback loop
and thus has no effect on playback.  And it helps to bear in mind that
there is *NO* ATRAC encoder ASIC in a player-only unit, only a decoder, and
ATRAC decoders have remained largely unchanged since Sony introduced it.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ returned to its special container and
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ kept under refrigeration.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-26 Thread J. Coon


Really, it don't make no difference if it is a Sony or a Sharp. or Aiwa,
or Panasonic.  Now if it were the K Mart brand... That might make a
difference, but the good companies will sound justs as good as each
other.  IMHO.

Richard Lang wrote:
 
 ...
 "All other things being equal,
 a disc recorded on a Sharp recorder will sound the same regardless of what
 player is used to play it."
 
 Really??  What about different DA converters?  Different amp stages?
 Different headphones?
 
 I would have thought that ATRAC aside (acknowledging that decoding ATRAC in
 the playback process is the same regardless of the version of ATRAC
 decoder), the D/A converter will have a big impact on sound quality as
 between different units.
 
 richard
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-25 Thread Leon


Hi there,

I think the E800 mechanism may involve simply a spring, a movable lid (the
circular thing), and some restricting mechanisms. You'd push the disc in,
which forces the lid open. If I'm not mistaken, you simply move the lid open
in order to retrieve the disc. This would be simpler than the
(Jamiroquai-advertised) EP10/11.

The newest Sharp slot-in player (MD-SS321/322/421) are as thick as the E800,
if not actually thinner.  The Sharps are about 3-4mm thicker than their
clamshell counterparts at the time.

Panasonic's SJ-MJ30 and 35 functions like slot-in models, with a retractable
disc holder.  These are as slim as Panasonic's clamshell models (no more
than 1-2mm thicker max).  However, because a spring is used to hold down the
disc holder, when that spring goes bad the disc wouldn't load properly.  It
happened to my MJ30 after 6 months of use.

If you choose to believe that vibration affects playback quality, then a
more rigid disc holder would give better performance. Clamshell disc holders
can be made very thin.  A slot-in mechanism can also be made
thinner/lighter, but it seems that noone has put any RD into that. So, at
this point, slot-in remains the one that feels solid in your hands.

So the orthodox Sharp-style slot-in is probably still the best.  Wish Sharp
would make a 321 replacement based on the ST-55. That could be 15-16mm
thick...

Leon



 If you look at the pictures of how this works, it really looks like a
 clamshell/slot-in hybrid.  It looks like they picked up much of the
 unit strength of the slot in design without adding much height to the
 unit.  It appears that once the disk is inserted it pivots a bit to move
 into place, unlike the sharp designs where the disk must raise and
 lower parallel to the mechanism which adds to the height of the
 units. (not that I don't love my 722)  I hate marketspeak as much
 as anyone but I does look like Sony has a new twist here.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-25 Thread J. van de Griek


Stainless Steel Rat wrote:

 * Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
 | Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
 | look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion).

 Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
 recording and playback quality?

It doesn't. However, I have noticed that the MiniDisc community tends to
value looks more than most other gearhead communities. Or at least is more
willing to admit that they do so.

Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-25 Thread J. Coon



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

"J. van de Griek" wrote:
 
 Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
 
  * Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
  | Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
  | look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion).
 
  Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
  recording and playback quality?
 
 It doesn't. However, I have noticed that the MiniDisc community tends to
 value looks more than most other gearhead communities. Or at least is more
 willing to admit that they do so.

But appearance does affect both record and playback quality.  If it
doesn't look good you are hesitant to bring it out in the open to do the
recording, so you end up in not the best place to record because of it. 
It affects playback quality too because you have to look at the thing to
turn it on and to put the MD inside it.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-25 Thread Alexander Dietrich


J. van de Griek wrote:

 It doesn't. However, I have noticed that the MiniDisc community tends to
 value looks more than most other gearhead communities. Or at least is more
 willing to admit that they do so.

'course we do, MD equipment is sexy ! It's the only reason
we shell out these insane amounts of money. :)
But seriously, I would rather buy even a Sony R37 than touch
any current MP3 player.

Alexander
-- 
( Alexander Dietrich | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-25 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Richard Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Tue, 25 Jul 2000
| ...
| "All other things being equal,
| a disc recorded on a Sharp recorder will sound the same regardless of what
| player is used to play it."

| Really??  What about different DA converters?  Different amp stages?
| Different headphones?

Which part of "all other things being equal" did you you have trouble
understanding?
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ 
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
| Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
| look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion).

Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
recording and playback quality?
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ 
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread David Sowa


 JUST ARRIVED: Say goodbye to the clamshell! Minidisco now has Sony 
 Japan's new MZ-E800 portable player, with a revolutionary pop-in disc 
 loading mechanism. Huzzah!
 
 Uh, revolutionary? Funny, I was sure it had been around for over three 
 years in the Sharp 700 series... grin

If you look at the pictures of how this works, it really looks like a 
clamshell/slot-in hybrid.  It looks like they picked up much of the 
unit strength of the slot in design without adding much height to the
unit.  It appears that once the disk is inserted it pivots a bit to move
into place, unlike the sharp designs where the disk must raise and
lower parallel to the mechanism which adds to the height of the
units. (not that I don't love my 722)  I hate marketspeak as much
as anyone but I does look like Sony has a new twist here.

Perhaps minidisco would like to loan me one and I'll check out
the new mechanism and post a review.

regards,

dsowa

ps here is the link to the pictures
http://minidisc.co.kr/md/mdp/sony/E800/



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Timothy P. Stockman


 Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism!

I have an 'R70 (clamshell) and an 'EP11 (slot-in).  The slot-in mechanism
feels a *lot* more solid.  I always feel as if I have to be super-gentle
with the R70.  I wish Sony was offering portable recorders with slot-in.
Especially recorders, because the magnet head assembly makes them even more
fragile than play-only...

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Jeffrey Scorsone



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:

 
 * Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
 | Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
 | look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion).
 
 Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
 recording and playback quality?


It doesn't, the Sharp ATRAC chip affects it's recording and playback

-Jeff (Love my Sony)

 -- 
 Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
 Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ 
 PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Jeffrey Scorsone [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Mon, 24 Jul 2000
| It doesn't, the Sharp ATRAC chip affects it's recording and playback

Well, non-recording, player-only units don't have an ATRAC encoder circuit,
so that statement only applies to recording.  All other things being equal,
a disc recorded on a Sharp recorder will sound the same regardless of what
player is used to play it.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete.
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ 
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Alexander Dietrich


Stainless Steel Rat wrote:

 Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
 recording and playback quality?

Where did I state that the look of a porty affects its recording
and playback quality ?

Alexander
-- 
( Alexander Dietrich | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-24 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Mon, 24 Jul 2000
| Where did I state that the look of a porty affects its recording
| and playback quality ?

Where did I state that you did? :)
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ 
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-23 Thread Dan Frakes


A few days ago I received the MiniDisco.com newsletter/email. It 
contained the following:

JUST ARRIVED: Say goodbye to the clamshell! Minidisco now has Sony 
Japan's new MZ-E800 portable player, with a revolutionary pop-in disc 
loading mechanism. Huzzah!

Uh, revolutionary? Funny, I was sure it had been around for over three 
years in the Sharp 700 series... grin
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-23 Thread Richard Wright


At 12:27 23/07/2000 -0700, you wrote:
SNIP
 JUST ARRIVED: Say goodbye to the clamshell! Minidisco now has Sony
 Japan's new MZ-E800 portable player, with a revolutionary pop-in disc
 loading mechanism. Huzzah!

Uh, revolutionary? Funny, I was sure it had been around for over three
years in the Sharp 700 series... grin

Yeah, I thought I'd seen it somewhere before :)  That's one of the reasons 
why I bought my 722 - I didn't like those horrible clamshells on most of 
the other models.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-23 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* Richard Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
| Yeah, I thought I'd seen it somewhere before :)  That's one of the reasons
| why I bought my 722 - I didn't like those horrible clamshells on most of the
| other models.

Never mind that some of Sony's earlier portable players are slot-load
mechanisms.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ returned to its special container and
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ kept under refrigeration.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Revolutionary?

2000-07-23 Thread Alexander Dietrich


Dan Frakes wrote:

 JUST ARRIVED: Say goodbye to the clamshell! Minidisco now has Sony 
 Japan's new MZ-E800 portable player, with a revolutionary pop-in disc 
 loading mechanism. Huzzah!

Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion). I really hope
that this is not going to be the norm for Sony. Just imagine an
R90 with a pop-in mechanism, shudder.

Alexander
-- 
( Alexander Dietrich | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]