ssh from cellpone to openbsd
FYI - I was able to ssh2 vith vt320term using username/password to openbsd using sprintpcs cellphone (not the fancy palm like ones but the newer lesser vision phones that play media and midp java apps) application on cellphone: MidpSSH is an SSH and Telnet client for MIDP 1.0 / 2.0 devices such as Java(tm)-capable cellphones. http://www.xk72.com/midpssh/index.html You can send this URL http://xk72.com/wap in a text message, messaging.sprintpcs.com, and the phone can go to it give wap menu and after selection can download and know its an application. BTW, full ssh2 build, 108KB seems to be working on the new sprintpcs phones, like the SANYO MM-5600 will take some playing with to figure best way to macro key inputs. not sure how audited the software is, but java source is suppose to be available. and not sure if can use keys, it does have a import session from url feature that I have not explored. but it is interesting.
Re: perl -MCPAN checksum mismatch on anything
At 09:40 PM 6/24/2005, Uwe Dippel wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:03:31 -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: I too have this same problem. Fresh install...no custom anything...just trying to add modules to perl, and anything tried fails 100% no matter which source I use (even perl.org). Whats going on? - anyone have any further insight on this? Promise and curse of the base install. I wished I simply could wipe perl and install it from scratch; but since it does belong to the base, I wouldn't know how. I have of course removed the .perl stuff, but that's not everything. Some config is written in /usr/libdata respectively /usr/local at your initial call of cpan, respectively the o conf init. Uwe for the record, I rather tried this. I built a NEW version of perl from src and used all different locations. When I tried to run MCPAN on this version, it fails the exact same way. So I wouldnt waste any time trying that :) -- J.D. Bronson Information Services - Telecom Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787
Re: usr mounted nosuid by default..?
Hi, I don't know if it's a bug or not, but you don't need to reinstall. You could edit /etc/fstab and if needed tar zxvfp base37.tgz and others Regards Alex 2005/6/25, asdfasdf asfdasdfasdf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The nosuid thing is the only inconsistency I've noticed. Should I be concerned enough to do a reinstall?
Re: can't find /etc/crontab ?
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7) FILES /var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab /var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab /var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs I think there's a reason that they include the man (manual) command. Works much better than playing guessing games. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neta Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 6:02 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: can't find /etc/crontab ? Hello All, I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab ? is this crontab disable by default? how i can enable it? Kind regards Neta
Re: can't find /etc/crontab ?
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:12:55 -0500 man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7) FILES /var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab /var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab /var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs man cron FILES /etc/crontab system crontab file /var/cron/atjobs directory containing at(1) jobs /var/cron/log cron's log file /var/cron/tabsdirectory containing individual crontab files /var/cron/tabs/.sock used by crontab(1) to tell cron to check for crontab changes immediately /etc/crontab works but doesnt exist by default, you'll have to create it yourself. Beware that the format is slightly different. --- Lars Hansson
Re: can't find /etc/crontab ?
Ok guys, Finally i can find it :) TIA Neta On 6/25/05, Schvberle Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not quite so. System crontab is located in /etc but doesn't exists by default. You have to make your own. Watch out for access rights or else crond won't parse it. man 5 crontab root's crontab is located in /var/cron/tabs. Daniel. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Kahari Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 1:28 PM To: Neta Cc: openbsd-misc Subject: Re: can't find /etc/crontab ? The system (root) crontab is not stored in /etc but in /var/cron/tabs like for everybody else. Edit the crontab with crontab -e as root to change it, do not modify it directly. Andreas On 25/06/05, Neta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab ? is this crontab disable by default? how i can enable it? Kind regards Neta -- Andreas Kahari PGP: 1024D/C2E163CB
Re: server disaster, forking failure?
Hi, On the Netserver I blocked Linux OS from accessing ssh port with PF as I exclusively use OpenBSD and the problem did not occur again but as mentioned it was replaced fairly shortly afterwards. How did you figure this out? I'm curious. block in log proto tcp from any os Linux to ($ext_if) port ssh is an option. Bye... Nico
Disk On Key under 3.6
Hi, I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6 dmesg shows following output: OpenBSD 3.6 (GENERIC) #59: Fri Sep 17 12:32:57 MDT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi (Geode by NSC 586-class) 232 MHz cpu0: FPU,TSC,MSR,CX8,CMOV,MMX cpu0: TSC disabled real mem = 536424448 (523852K) avail mem = 482570240 (471260K) using 4278 buffers containing 26923008 bytes (26292K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(2a) BIOS, date 11/15/00, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfadc0 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xb248 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdae0/160 (8 entries) pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 3 10 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found: ICU vendor 0x1078 product 0x0100 pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x2000! 0xcc000/0x4000! cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Cyrix GXm PCI rev 0x00 puc0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Topic/SmartLink 5634PCV SurfRider rev 0x00: com pccom3 at puc0 port 0 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo vga1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 unknown vendor 0x10ea product 0x5000 rev 0x03 wsdisplay0 at vga1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) rl0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 Realtek 8139 rev 0x10: irq 3 address 00:30:00:04:04:66 rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal phy pcib0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 Cyrix Cx5530 South rev 0x00 Cyrix Cx5530 SMI/ACPI rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 18 function 1 not configured pciide0 at pci0 dev 18 function 2 Cyrix Cx5530 IDE rev 0x00: no DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility pciide0: channel 0 ignored (other hardware responding at addresses) pciide0: channel 1 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?) Cyrix Cx5530 XpressAUDIO rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 18 function 3 not configured ohci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 Compaq USB OpenHost rev 0x06: irq 11, version 1.0, legacy support ohci0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Compaq OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered isa0 at pcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0 wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14 wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0: IC25N040ATMR04-0 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38154MB, 78140160 sectors wd0(wdc0:0:0): using BIOS timings sb0 at isa0 port 0x220/24 irq 5 drq 1: dsp v4.12 midi0 at sb0: SB MIDI UART audio0 at sb0 opl0 at sb0: model OPL3 midi1 at opl0: SB Yamaha OPL3 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi2 at pcppi0: PC speaker sysbeep0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 biomask ef45 netmask ef4d ttymask ffcf pctr: no performance counters in CPU dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 0 interface 0 umass0: M-Systems DiskOnKey, rev 1.00/2.00, addr 2 umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: M-Sys, DiskOnKey, 1.08 SCSI0 0/direct removable sd0: 7MB, 7 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 15600 sec total since its showing scsibus0 and umass0 I assumed /dev/sd0a would be the device to control the DOK. Following is what I did and what the system showed me in response: # mount_msdos /dev/sd0a /mnt/ mount_msdos: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured # newfs_msdos /dev/sd0a newfs_msdos: /dev/sd0a: Device not configured Which device in /dev should I use to mount/format the drive? ~Mayuresh
Re: Disk On Key under 3.6
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: Hi, I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6 dmesg shows following output: SNIP ohci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 Compaq USB OpenHost rev 0x06: irq 11, version 1.0, legacy support ohci0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: Compaq OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered SNIP umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 0 interface 0 umass0: M-Systems DiskOnKey, rev 1.00/2.00, addr 2 umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: M-Sys, DiskOnKey, 1.08 SCSI0 0/direct removable sd0: 7MB, 7 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 15600 sec total since its showing scsibus0 and umass0 I assumed /dev/sd0a would be the device to control the DOK. Following is what I did and what the system showed me in response: # mount_msdos /dev/sd0a /mnt/ mount_msdos: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured # newfs_msdos /dev/sd0a newfs_msdos: /dev/sd0a: Device not configured Which device in /dev should I use to mount/format the drive? ~Mayuresh What does disklable sd0 return? diana
Re: Disk On Key under 3.6
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Diana Eichert wrote: SNIP What does disklable sd0 return? diana aieh, need more kaffe. that would be disklabel sd0
Disk On Key under 3.6
On 6/25/05, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following is what I did and what the system showed me in response: # mount_msdos /dev/sd0a /mnt/ mount_msdos: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured # newfs_msdos /dev/sd0a newfs_msdos: /dev/sd0a: Device not configured Which device in /dev should I use to mount/format the drive? It's quite possible you'll need to check the disklabel for sd0 to determine which partition is recognized as fat; on many (but not all I've seen), it will be /dev/sd0i or /dev/sd0j . As always, I'd strongly suggest looking at the FAQ: In this case, 14.17: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#flashmem -- Christian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleph0.com/~chjones
OT - network design documents
Hi, Off Topic, but I'm struggling.. I have been contracted to make some network changes at a site I originally set up 10 years ago. It started with a couple of PC's with an OpenBSD server as the default gateway/firewall. As time went on, the site has grown and now is 200+ computers and several other gateways to other sites (hospitals, government, etc). And yes, the OpenBSD firewall (though upgraded) is still key in this network topology. The original idea was to have all the routes on the OpenBSD firewall and rely on ICMP redirects to build dynamic routes where needed. This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine. The IT department at the hospital has said Note: I had problem before, the PIX does not like to do icmp redirect. Its work best and better security if the internal hub is a layer 3 switch then you control the route policy/Access List from the layer 3 switch. Well, this is a wee bit over my head, and I really need to read up on how to PROPERLY design a larger network environment with multiple (4-5) different gateways and maintain routes properly with minimal human intervention. This has to work with a mixed bag of Windows 98 and up and assorted Unix systems. I also need to figure out how OpenBSD will fit into this infrastructure, as I really like the stability/configurability of OpenBSD ( and spamd :-) ). Does anyone have pointers, Web or books ( I don't mind spending $$ ) for resources that would help me understand more complex networks. Thanks, Steve Williams
Re: OT - network design documents
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine. The IT department at the hospital has said Note: I had problem before, the PIX does not like to do icmp redirect. Its work best and better security if the internal hub is a layer 3 switch then you control the route policy/Access List from the layer 3 switch. layer three switch is marketing speak for a particular style of router. you will probably want to look at increasing the sophistication of the routing setup on your openbsd system. the openbsd system will never be a layer three switch, but it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router, which is quite a reasonable thing to do. without a bit more detail, it's hard to advise you on what path to take. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil
Re: External, USB hard drives
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Steven Bowers wrote: Any comments on the Buslink drives? I found a site selling both 1.1 and 2.0 drives for a some-what reasonable price. Seems like all the USB 2.0 stuff is 120GB or greater and $100 and up. Since I'm primarily backing up about 1MB of data I'm not sure I need that much capacity Any suggestions on something under $100? Get thee a USB thumb drive (solid state) - for that small an amount of data, you don't need a HD. Lee Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation Network/Internet Consultants www.omnitec.net
Re: can't find /etc/crontab ?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] so spake Neta (netasys): Hello All, I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab ? is this crontab disable by default? how i can enable it? /etc/crontab is not used by default, it predates the availability of per-user crontab files. As such it is not included by default, though you can create it if you really must. I don't suggest this as you lose the syntax checking of crontab (1). - todd
Re: OT - network design documents
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine. The IT department at the hospital has said Note: I had problem before, the PIX does not like to do icmp redirect. Its work best and better security if the internal hub is a layer 3 switch then you control the route policy/Access List from the layer 3 switch. layer three switch is marketing speak for a particular style of router. you will probably want to look at increasing the sophistication of the routing setup on your openbsd system. the openbsd system will never be a layer three switch, but it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router, which is quite a reasonable thing to do. without a bit more detail, it's hard to advise you on what path to take. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil Hi, Thanks for answering... I was trying to avoid discussing this in depth on this list as it's really off topic. In retrospect, more information would probably help people be able to refer me to approiate documentation! Here it goes.. internet_connection - 192.168.11.1/32 ---+ Default Route| OpenBSD 3.7 | In my control 100% | | remote_site - 192.168.11.2/32 -+ | 192.168.12.0/24| | Cisco 2620, IOS 12.0 | | Only Cisco router in my control Cisco Catalyst 2900 Switch | | | Hospital_site - 192.168.11.3/32 -+ | | a.b.c.0/24 | | Cisco 1720 - T1 | | Cisco PIX 506E | | | | Government_site - 192.168.11.4/32 ---+ | w.x.y.0/24 | Cisco 1720 - T1| Cisco PIX 506E | Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 ---+ All systems have the default route to be the OpenBSD system. On that box, the static routes are: route add 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.11.2# remote_site packets route add a.b.c.0/24 192.168.11.3# Hospital packets route add w.x.y.0/24 192.168.11.4# government packets There are a few routes on the Cisco 2620, but that's just to handle the WAN traffic. The Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 are a mixed bag of Windows 98 up to XP SP2, with a Max XServer, Imac's, AIX system, and a few wireless access points which will be going because of security issues. The problem is that Windows computers trying to access the Hospital Site using HTTPS are not working. We narrowed it down to the ICMP redirect from the OpenBSD box casing the problem. We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on 150+ PC's of various flavors... Like I said in my previous email, this network evolved form 2 PC's to what it is currently, and the network design really needs an upgrade to make it 20th Century so to speak. I would really like to read up on this so that I can fully understand all the design issues/compromises. Thanks for any pointers. Cheers, Steve
Re: OT - network design documents
On 6/25/05, Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on 150+ PC's of various flavors... How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in dhcp-options(5) as option static-routes. You may want to give it a spin. Besides that, have you searched the list archives for ICMP redirect problems? Somehow it sounds familiar. Cheers, Rogier -- If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Re: floppy37C.fs image too big for device
I've had the same problem since 3.7 was released on all (vmware) machines
i've tried it on, i just copied floppy B conf over floppy C and it built
fine, I don't use the floppies anyway.
Brad
From: Raymond Lillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: floppy37C.fs image too big for device
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:41:03 -0700
Dear Misc,
Yesterday, I cvs updated my 3.7-release tree and performed
all steps necessary to make a new release to propagate to
other i386 boxes. All went well until it was time to create
the floppy37C.fs image.
My theory is that the latest updates have just slightly
bumped up the kernel size, just enough to blow a floppy
This doesn't represent a real problem for me as I will
build a bootable CDROM for my use by skipping over this
(for me) unneeded step.
This machine is an old Pentium-II machine that I use to
do builds and archive stuff I seldom need, like releases.
In the interest of completeness, a dmesg is at the very
end. This machine is running on the kernel and userland
from which I tried to build this release.
If the build has gone wrong and ramdiskC/bsd.gz shouldn't
be 1392717 bytes, then I will need to start this whole
process from scratch as I didn't log the terminal output
to a file. The snippets here are from my xterm window.
On this slow machine it will take more than a working day.
Regards all,
Ray
Here is the size of the ramdisk image files:
# pwd
/usr/obj/distrib/i386
# /bin/ls -l ramdisk*/bsd.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wsrc 1353280 Jun 23 00:43 ramdiskA/bsd.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wsrc 1372697 Jun 23 00:56 ramdiskB/bsd.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wsrc 1392717 Jun 23 01:10 ramdiskC/bsd.gz
Next I will show the terminal output from make release with
irrelevant stuff snipped out. There are three snippets of
terminal output, showing each of the three floppy images
being created.
Everything previous deleted
About ready to write floppy37 image
building standard compat library
ranlib libcompat.a
cc -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wno-uninitialized -Wno-format -Wno-main -fno-stack-protector
-fno-builtin-printf -fno-builtin-log -Os -pipe -nostdinc -I.
-I/opt/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/../../../../arch
-I/opt/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/../../../.. -DSCSITERSE
-DAPM_NOPRINT -DI386_CPU -DI486_CPU -DI586_CPU -DI686_CPU -DSMALL_KERNEL
-DNO_PROPOLICE -DTIMEZONE=0 -DDST=0 -DFFS -DEXT2FS -DCD9660 -DMSDOSFS
-DFIFO -DINET -DBOOT_CONFIG -DRAMDISK_HOOKS -DMINIROOTSIZE=0xed8
-DPCIVERBOSE -D_KERNEL -Di386 -c swapbsd.c
sh /opt/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/../../../../conf/newvers.sh
cc -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wno-uninitialized -Wno-format -Wno-main -fno-stack-protector
-fno-builtin-printf -fno-builtin-log -Os -pipe -nostdinc -I.
-I/opt/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/../../../../arch
-I/opt/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/../../../.. -DSCSITERSE
-DAPM_NOPRINT -DI386_CPU -DI486_CPU -DI586_CPU -DI686_CPU -DSMALL_KERNEL
-DNO_PROPOLICE -DTIMEZONE=0 -DDST=0 -DFFS -DEXT2FS -DCD9660 -DMSDOSFS
-DFIFO -DINET -DBOOT_CONFIG -DRAMDISK_HOOKS -DMINIROOTSIZE=0xed8
-DPCIVERBOSE -D_KERNEL -Di386 -c vers.c
rm -f bsd
ld -Ttext 0xD0100120 -e start -N -S -x -o bsd ${SYSTEM_OBJ} vers.o
textdatabss dec hex
1273037 1985700 280468 3539205 360105
cp
/opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/../../../sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK/bsd
bsd
cc -DDEBUG -o rdsetroot
/opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/../../common/elfrdsetroot.c
cp bsd bsd.rd
/opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/obj/rdsetroot bsd.rd mr.fs
segment 0 rd_root_size_off = 0x13c940
rd_root_image_off = 0x13c960
rd_root_size val: 0x001DB000 (3800 blocks)
copying root image...
...copied 1945600 bytes
cp bsd.rd bsd.strip
strip bsd.strip
strip -R .comment bsd.strip
gzip -c9 bsd.strip bsd.gz
dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/image.2095 bs=10k count=144
144+0 records in
144+0 records out
1474560 bytes transferred in 0.035 secs (41898051 bytes/sec)
vnconfig -v -c svnd0 /var/tmp/image.2095
svnd0: 1474560 bytes on /var/tmp/image.2095
disklabel -w -r svnd0 floppy3
newfs -m 0 -o space -i 524288 -c 80 /dev/rsvnd0a
/dev/rsvnd0a: 2880 sectors in 80 cylinders of 2 tracks, 18 sectors
1.4MB in 1 cyl groups (80 c/g, 1.41MB/g, 32 i/g)
super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
32,
mount /dev/svnd0a /mnt
cp /opt/OpenBSD/i386/dest/usr/mdec/boot
/opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/obj/boot
strip /opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/obj/boot
strip -R .comment /opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/obj/boot
dd if=/opt/usr/src/distrib/i386/ramdiskA/obj/boot of=/mnt/boot bs=512
75+1 records in
75+1 records out
38612 bytes transferred in 0.002 secs (17214445 bytes/sec)
dd if=bsd.gz of=/mnt/bsd bs=512
2643+1 records in
2643+1 records out
1353280 bytes transferred in 0.193 secs (6976569 bytes/sec)
/usr/mdec/installboot -v /mnt/boot
/opt/OpenBSD/i386/dest/usr/mdec/biosboot /dev/rsvnd0c
boot: /mnt/boot
proto:
Re: OT - network design documents
Steve Williams wrote: On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine. The IT department at the hospital has said Note: I had problem before, the PIX does not like to do icmp redirect. Its work best and better security if the internal hub is a layer 3 switch then you control the route policy/Access List from the layer 3 switch. layer three switch is marketing speak for a particular style of router. you will probably want to look at increasing the sophistication of the routing setup on your openbsd system. the openbsd system will never be a layer three switch, but it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router, which is quite a reasonable thing to do. without a bit more detail, it's hard to advise you on what path to take. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil Hi, Thanks for answering... I was trying to avoid discussing this in depth on this list as it's really off topic. In retrospect, more information would probably help people be able to refer me to approiate documentation! Here it goes.. internet_connection - 192.168.11.1/32 ---+ Default Route| OpenBSD 3.7 | In my control 100% | | remote_site - 192.168.11.2/32 -+ | 192.168.12.0/24| | Cisco 2620, IOS 12.0 | | Only Cisco router in my control Cisco Catalyst 2900 Switch | | | Hospital_site - 192.168.11.3/32 -+ | | a.b.c.0/24 | | Cisco 1720 - T1 | | Cisco PIX 506E | | | | Government_site - 192.168.11.4/32 ---+ | w.x.y.0/24 | Cisco 1720 - T1| Cisco PIX 506E | Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 ---+ All systems have the default route to be the OpenBSD system. On that box, the static routes are: route add 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.11.2# remote_site packets route add a.b.c.0/24 192.168.11.3# Hospital packets route add w.x.y.0/24 192.168.11.4# government packets There are a few routes on the Cisco 2620, but that's just to handle the WAN traffic. The Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 are a mixed bag of Windows 98 up to XP SP2, with a Max XServer, Imac's, AIX system, and a few wireless access points which will be going because of security issues. The problem is that Windows computers trying to access the Hospital Site using HTTPS are not working. We narrowed it down to the ICMP redirect from the OpenBSD box casing the problem. We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on 150+ PC's of various flavors... Like I said in my previous email, this network evolved form 2 PC's to what it is currently, and the network design really needs an upgrade to make it 20th Century so to speak. I would really like to read up on this so that I can fully understand all the design issues/compromises. Thanks for any pointers. Cheers, Steve Are these Win XP sp2 boxes by any chance? I've had issues of such boxes not obeying icmp redirects because the Windows Firewall was activated. (For some reason also, the Checkpoint SecureRemote client sees to eat icmp redirects too (really, tcpdumping on the hub would show them, but they'd literally disapear on the machine's interface when windumping). JC
PPPoE on 486
I'd like to give a big hoot and cheer Theo and the gang. The new kernelized PPPoE is fast enough to keep up with two MMORPG instances, three internet radio streams, and three large downloads combining for an average of 130kb/sec all at once, while still being 30-50% idle! It never even came close when I tried with 3.4 and 3.5 (see threads from around this time last year). dmesg below. Both ep's are 3C509B in non-PNP mode, full duplex enabled. I imagine it would still grind to a halt if I tried to SSH stuff on account of the crypto (it's a 33MHz chip), but DSL firewalling doesn't require that :) top says... load averages: 0.34, 0.27, 0.25 CPU states: 5% user, 0% nice, 5% system, 55% interrupt, 35% idle OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel 486DX (486-class) real mem = 66695168 (65132K) avail mem = 53452800 (52200K) using 839 buffers containing 3436544 bytes (3356K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 05/05/91 pcibios at bios0 function 0x1a not configured bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xd/0x4000 cpu0 at mainbus0 isa0 at mainbus0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0 (mux 1 ignored for console): console keyboard vga0 at isa0 port 0x3b0/48 iomem 0xa/131072 wsdisplay0 at vga0: console (80x25, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14 wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0: QUANTUM BIGFOOT2550A wd0: 8-sector PIO, LBA, 2457MB, 5033952 sectors wd0(wdc0:0:0): using BIOS timings wdc1 at isa0 port 0x170/8 irq 15 atapiscsi0 at wdc1 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: NEC, CD-ROM DRIVE:282, 4.46 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(wdc1:0:0): using BIOS timings ep0 at isa0 port 0x2a0/16 irq 12: address 00:60:97:b6:04:8e, utp (default utp) ep1 at isa0 port 0x300/16 irq 11: address 00:60:08:12:df:f5, utp (default utp) sb0 at isa0 port 0x220/24 irq 5 drq 1: dsp v4.11 midi0 at sb0: SB MIDI UART audio0 at sb0 opl0 at sb0: model OPL3 midi1 at opl0: SB Yamaha OPL3 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi2 at pcppi0: PC speaker sysbeep0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16 pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec fd1 at fdc0 drive 1: 1.2MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 15 sec biomask e745 netmask ff45 ttymask ffc7 pctr: no performance counters in CPU dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 pppoe0: phase establish pppoe0: phase authenticate pppoe0: phase network
Re: upgrading from OpenBSD/i386 from 3.3 and before by remote
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.holland-consulting.net/obsd/aout-up.html Just today a guy came up to the OpenBSD booth at LinuxTag (Karlsruhe, Germany) and asked for help on remote updating of a client's 2.9(!) systems located in Kansas(!). Apparently he doesn't read misc@ and so was very happy when I pointed him to your guide. ;-) -- Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT - network design documents
Steve Williams wrote: On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine. The IT department at the hospital has said Note: I had problem before, the PIX does not like to do icmp redirect. Its work best and better security if the internal hub is a layer 3 switch then you control the route policy/Access List from the layer 3 switch. layer three switch is marketing speak for a particular style of router. you will probably want to look at increasing the sophistication of the routing setup on your openbsd system. the openbsd system will never be a layer three switch, but it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router, which is quite a reasonable thing to do. without a bit more detail, it's hard to advise you on what path to take. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil Hi, Thanks for answering... I was trying to avoid discussing this in depth on this list as it's really off topic. In retrospect, more information would probably help people be able to refer me to approiate documentation! Here it goes.. internet_connection - 192.168.11.1/32 ---+ Default Route| OpenBSD 3.7 | In my control 100% | | remote_site - 192.168.11.2/32 -+ | 192.168.12.0/24| | Cisco 2620, IOS 12.0 | | Only Cisco router in my control Cisco Catalyst 2900 Switch | | | Hospital_site - 192.168.11.3/32 -+ | | a.b.c.0/24 | | Cisco 1720 - T1 | | Cisco PIX 506E | | | | Government_site - 192.168.11.4/32 ---+ | w.x.y.0/24 | Cisco 1720 - T1| Cisco PIX 506E | Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 ---+ All systems have the default route to be the OpenBSD system. On that box, the static routes are: route add 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.11.2# remote_site packets route add a.b.c.0/24 192.168.11.3# Hospital packets route add w.x.y.0/24 192.168.11.4# government packets There are a few routes on the Cisco 2620, but that's just to handle the WAN traffic. The Rest of 192.168.11.0/24 are a mixed bag of Windows 98 up to XP SP2, with a Max XServer, Imac's, AIX system, and a few wireless access points which will be going because of security issues. The problem is that Windows computers trying to access the Hospital Site using HTTPS are not working. We narrowed it down to the ICMP redirect from the OpenBSD box casing the problem. We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on 150+ PC's of various flavors... Like I said in my previous email, this network evolved form 2 PC's to what it is currently, and the network design really needs an upgrade to make it 20th Century so to speak. I would really like to read up on this so that I can fully understand all the design issues/compromises. Thanks for any pointers. Cheers, Steve Are these Win XP sp2 boxes by any chance? I've had issues of such boxes not obeying icmp redirects because the Windows Firewall was activated. (For some reason also, the Checkpoint SecureRemote client sees to eat icmp redirects too (really, tcpdumping on the hub would show them, but they'd literally disapear on the machine's interface when windumping). JC Hello, Wow, what a guess g Yes, they are XP sp2 boxes I was working with. I will check on Monday to see if Firewalling was enabled. I don't think that should matter though. All it means is that every packet would hit the OpenBSD firewall and get sent to the right system (along with an ICMP redirect for every packt :-( ). Not a good situation... Regardless, thank you very much for your pointer. One more thing to add to my list of potentially stupid things to overlook. I run ZoneAlarm on my own system always remember to turn it off. Never thought about the Windows Firewall on client's systems. Cheers, Steve
Re: OT - network design documents
Don't thank me just yet. I should've checked my notes. On 6/25/05, Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in dhcp-options(5) as option static-routes. OMG! What a simple solution! It's so simple it never occured to me. According to MS' Knowledgebase [1], Win2K is the first OS to support option 33. Also, the static-routes option is classful (and thus rather old fashioned). Classful means that the choice of the destination implies the netmask. RFC3442 [2] has more info on an option implementing classless routing (option 121), but I do not believe it is a standard just yet. Your mileage may vary as you may end up with a /32 route. Perhaps pushing group policies and/or login scripts may prove a better option in such a case. Rogier References: 1. Incorrect subnet mask and options assigned from Windows NT 4.0 DHCP server http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;261489 2. The Classless Static Route option for DHCP version 4 ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3442.txt -- If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Re: server disaster, forking failure?
No, this is not what I was asking for. Of course, we can block by OS but what I wanted to know was, how did Steve determine that Linux hosts were causing him grief on the Netserver running 3.6 ? I should have been clearer. Sorry about that. Thanks nevertheless. Mark T. Uemura OpenBSD Support Japan Inc. www.openbsd-support.com On the Netserver I blocked Linux OS from accessing ssh port with PF as I exclusively use OpenBSD and the problem did not occur again but as mentioned it was replaced fairly shortly afterwards. How did you figure this out? I'm curious. block in log proto tcp from any os Linux to ($ext_if) port ssh is an option. Bye... Nico
PPP, PPPoE, and OpenBSD 3.7
Hi all, I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to 3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor. My ppp.conf is thus : swiftdsl: set log Phase Chat IPCP CCP tun command set device !/usr/sbin/pppoe -i em2 -v set reconnect 5 18 disable acfcomp protocomp deny acfcomp set mtu max 1440 set mru max 1440 set speed sync set cd 5 set dial set login set timeout 0 set authname myusername set authkey myauthkey enable mssfixup I've also tried enable LQR, and using allow users as well, but to no avail. I've gone through using interactive mode as well, and same result, no connection. The actual error from the daemon log is as follows : Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 0 secs: 44 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 24 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: total 44 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Sun Jun 26 13:01:17 2005 Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: HUPing 8204 Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - opening Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Enter pause (5) for redialing. Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Reconnect try 6 of 18 Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Redial timer expired. Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Warning: Carrier settings ignored Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - login Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: login - lcp Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: read (2): Connection reset by peer Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: lcp - logout Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: logout - hangup Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! I've tried speaking to my ISP, aside from them not having much of a clue, they did claim to have reset my connection with them, but still not change to my situation - and I can only reset my modem so many times before I go insane ;-) Anything anyone can spot that might help me sort this out ? I even tried the kernel based pppoe device, but no joy there either. Cheers Dave
difference between newfs and newfs -m 1 on a 250G hd?
Hi, Just bought a WDC 250G HD. Model WD2500JB-00G. I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable. fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a newfs /dev/wd3a, the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and mounts without problems. Any idea why? -Tai disklabel says: # using MBR partition 0: type A6 off 0 (0x0) size 488392065 (0x1d1c4581) # /dev/rwd3c: type: ESDI disk: ESDI/IDE disk label: WDC WD2500JB-00G flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 16 sectors/cylinder: 1008 cylinders: 16383 total sectors: 488397168 rpm: 7200 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # microseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # microseconds drivedata: 0 16 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a: 488392065 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # (Cyl. 0 - 484515*) c: 488397168 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 484520)
Re: Strange df output
5% or so is reserved for root and is not available. When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful if the situation does NOT apply to root. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew S Elmore Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Strange df output Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/
Re: Strange df output
Whichever definition the 'df -h' command is using. I'm assuming it's consistent in its use itself. ;) On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Chris wrote: Matthew S Elmore wrote: Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/ Define the size of a meg. As you know, one meg can be 1.44, or 1.0 if you know what I mean. So, it really depends sometimes on the value of one meg. -- Best regards, Chris The man who has no more problems is out of the game.
Re: Strange df output
Matthew S Elmore wrote: Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/ Define the size of a meg. As you know, one meg can be 1.44, or 1.0 if you know what I mean. So, it really depends sometimes on the value of one meg. -- Best regards, Chris The man who has no more problems is out of the game.
Re: Strange df output
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105% capacity. Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;) From the FAQ sec 14.14: People are sometimes surprised to find they have negative available disk space, or more than 100% of a partition in use, as shown by df(1). When a partition is created with newfs(8), some of the available space is held in reserve from normal users. This provides a margin of error when you accidently fill the disk, and helps keep disk fragmentation to a minimum. Default for this is 5% of the disk capacity, so if the root user has been carelessly filling the disk, you may see up to 105% of the available capacity in use. On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5% or so is reserved for root and is not available. When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful if the situation does NOT apply to root. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew S Elmore Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Strange df output Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/
Re: Strange df output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 490*0.05 24.5 490-24.5-32.8 432.69 Math looks to be spot on with a reserved 5%. On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:48:21 -0700 Matthew S Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105% capacity. Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;) From the FAQ sec 14.14: People are sometimes surprised to find they have negative available disk space, or more than 100% of a partition in use, as shown by df(1). When a partition is created with newfs(8), some of the available space is held in reserve from normal users. This provides a margin of error when you accidently fill the disk, and helps keep disk fragmentation to a minimum. Default for this is 5% of the disk capacity, so if the root user has been carelessly filling the disk, you may see up to 105% of the available capacity in use. On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5% or so is reserved for root and is not available. When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful if the situation does NOT apply to root. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew S Elmore Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Strange df output Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.4 wkYEARECAAYFAkK+PJ4ACgkQnWfT5RLAiYOs1ACgnfD3w++hvtA+RAca+SDkJ4Vx76YA oKhqO/HT2Ihe3cEMnAo3IwOKlm1k =oomO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Strange df output
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/ 256252 blocks less 5% reserve. This gives 243440 blocks total available for users. less 180540 gives 62900 blocks currently available for users. 180540/243440 gives 74.162% which rounds to 74% For a user to write to the disk, it must be less than 100% full. If root has used up all the reserve, 105% capacity is a fair value, in that the user will need to free up in excess of 5% in order to have ANY free space in which to write stuff. For the above 256252 block partition, the percentages are based on the 243440 blocks of user-usable space rather than the total of 256252 blocks of root-usable space. Probably much kinder on users to run out at 100% than at 95%. Of course this requires that root runs out at something over 100%. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew S Elmore Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Strange df output It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105% capacity. Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;) From the FAQ sec 14.14: People are sometimes surprised to find they have negative available disk space, or more than 100% of a partition in use, as shown by df(1). When a partition is created with newfs(8), some of the available space is held in reserve from normal users. This provides a margin of error when you accidently fill the disk, and helps keep disk fragmentation to a minimum. Default for this is 5% of the disk capacity, so if the root user has been carelessly filling the disk, you may see up to 105% of the available capacity in use. On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5% or so is reserved for root and is not available. When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful if the situation does NOT apply to root. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew S Elmore Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35 PM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Strange df output Can anyone explain this math to me? 490M - 32.8M != 433M Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/
PPP, PPPoE, and OpenBSD 3.7
Hi all, I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to 3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor. My ppp.conf is thus : swiftdsl: set log Phase Chat IPCP CCP tun command set device !/usr/sbin/pppoe -i em2 -v set reconnect 5 18 disable acfcomp protocomp deny acfcomp set mtu max 1440 set mru max 1440 set speed sync set cd 5 set dial set login set timeout 0 set authname myusername set authkey myauthkey enable mssfixup I've also tried enable LQR, and using allow users as well, but to no avail. I've gone through using interactive mode as well, and same result, no connection. The actual error from the daemon log is as follows : Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 0 secs: 44 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 24 packets in, 0 packets out Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: total 44 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Sun Jun 26 13:01:17 2005 Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: HUPing 8204 Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup - opening Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Enter pause (5) for redialing. Jun 26 13:01:17 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Reconnect try 6 of 18 Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Redial timer expired. Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Warning: Carrier settings ignored Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - login Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: login - lcp Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: read (2): Connection reset by peer Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: lcp - logout Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: logout - hangup Jun 26 13:01:22 hiro ppp[3815]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! I've tried speaking to my ISP, aside from them not having much of a clue, they did claim to have reset my connection with them, but still not change to my situation - and I can only reset my modem so many times before I go insane ;-) Anything anyone can spot that might help me sort this out ? I even tried the kernel based pppoe device, but no joy there either. Cheers Dave
