Re: kern.maxcluster
What says these commands: netstat -m vmstat -m and default display of systat On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? Thanks My sysctl.conf is configured like this: kern.maxfiles=65536 # Multipath net.inet.ip.multipath=1 # carp net.inet.carp.allow=1 net.inet.carp.log=1 net.inet.carp.preempt=1 #net.inet.carp.arpbalance=1 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=10 net.inet.tcp.keepidle=14400 #net.inet.tcp.keepidle=30 net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=30 net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=100 #net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=400 net.inet.ip.redirect=1 #net.inet.ip.redirect=0 net.inet.ip.maxqueue=300 #net.inet.ip.maxqueue=1000 kern.somaxconn=128 #kern.somaxconn=256 net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=256 kern.maxclusters=262144
Re: kern.maxcluster
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? Thanks My sysctl.conf is configured like this: kern.maxfiles=65536 # Multipath net.inet.ip.multipath=1 # carp net.inet.carp.allow=1 net.inet.carp.log=1 net.inet.carp.preempt=1 #net.inet.carp.arpbalance=1 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=10 net.inet.tcp.keepidle=14400 #net.inet.tcp.keepidle=30 net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=30 net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=100 #net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=400 net.inet.ip.redirect=1 #net.inet.ip.redirect=0 net.inet.ip.maxqueue=300 #net.inet.ip.maxqueue=1000 kern.somaxconn=128 #kern.somaxconn=256 net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=256 kern.maxclusters=262144 And may be of some interest to know where did you get those recommendations? Smells like calomel.org or similar
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:02:15PM +, Glen Anderson wrote: I liked the idea of using an adjective when talking about the combined statistics however cumulative isn't really an accurate term and while ostensibly mean seems appropriate I'm unsure how top calculates that line on machines with CPUs of varying speeds. If it takes a mean of the percentages it's clearly misleading, if it does something a it cleverer use of the term mean is wrong. With this in mind I think the following tweak to Jason's suggestion would be best. i'm fine with this. anyone object? I am not in position to object or not. What I meant was to make it clear right from the man page that single line for all processors is indeed *combined* statistics for all CPU's in one set of numbers, not statistics for all individual processors somehow condensed to a single line. Perhaps word combined can be used there? Anyway, it was only a suggestion, if you think it is not relevant, simply ignore it. Glen's version is good too. Have a nice day. Regards, David $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new Thu Mar 24 17:59:30 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ The options are as follows: .Bl -tag -width Ds .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display CPU statistics for all processors on a single line instead of one +line per CPU. .It Fl b Use .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ .Sq P interactive command. .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle CPU statistics between a single line for all processors and one line +per CPU. .It C Toggle the display of process command line arguments. .It d Ar count
Re: GENERIC.MP cold reboot at savecore
Hello same problem here on DELL PowerEdge R210. Starting with OpenBSD 4.8 Release was Ok. Applying patchs one by one until patch 006_cbc.patch System cold reboots with this patch. Back to kernel GENERIC.MP 4.8 release + patchs : 001_bgpd.patch, 002_pci.patch, 003_vr.patch, 004_openssl.patch 005_pf.patch, is Ok. 2011/3/24 Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr I've tested a while ago the GENERIC.MP kernel of 4.8-stable and the system cold reboots. GENERIC runs fine. Trying to regenerate the problem I went into single user more and found out that it reboots when it executes /sbin/savecore /var/crash I tried ktrace but the dump was empty. I also tried disabling apm without luck. Any way to debug this? Attaching the dmesg. Thanx Giannis
Re: kern.maxcluster
Tomas Bodzar P?P8QP5Q: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: And may be of some interest to know where did you get those recommendations? Smells like calomel.org or similar why so many people hate calomel.org?
OBDS vs. NetBSD security
If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... :\ too many hits to count.. Thank you in anticipation.
Re: kern.maxcluster
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:37:08PM -0300, Kleber Rocha wrote: Hi, I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? Thanks My sysctl.conf is configured like this: kern.maxfiles=65536 Why are you bumping maxfiles on a firewall? # Multipath net.inet.ip.multipath=1 # carp net.inet.carp.allow=1 net.inet.carp.log=1 net.inet.carp.preempt=1 #net.inet.carp.arpbalance=1 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144 This is not doing what you think it does. Especially the UDP ones. net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepinittime=10 net.inet.tcp.keepidle=14400 #net.inet.tcp.keepidle=30 net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=150 #net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=30 net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=100 #net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit=400 net.inet.ip.redirect=1 #net.inet.ip.redirect=0 net.inet.ip.maxqueue=300 #net.inet.ip.maxqueue=1000 kern.somaxconn=128 #kern.somaxconn=256 Wow, you're pushing a lot of buttons here that should not be pushed unless you absolutly know what you are doing. net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=256 On fast systems this can normaly increased by factors of 2-4 to improve performance. kern.maxclusters=262144 Why do you think that you can increase this value by a factor of over 40? The warning is: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters Increase, it is not multiply! You may double the number maybe more if the warning happens again but a factor 40 will run your system out of memory. Also try to figure out where all that memory is going. I bet into the socketbuffers. You twiddled your system into death. -- :wq Claudio
Re: kern.maxcluster
* Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com [2011-03-25 04:32]: I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? by 1) stopping to push random buttons you obviously don't understand 2) submitting a proper bug report if the problem remains -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
Re: kern.maxcluster
* lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru [2011-03-25 11:06]: why so many people hate calomel.org? hate? no. ditch, because the recommendations there are bullshit. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
Re: OBDS vs. NetBSD security
On 2011-03-25 11.14, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... :\ too many hits to count.. Yes, you are trolling and yes, it's a flame topic. And you know it. But I know your English isn't perfect, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. First of all, I don't know how you've come up with the figures you mention. When I use the site's search form and choose openbsd or openbsd/x86 (x86 is for some reason separated from the rest of the supported architectures), and don't enter any search criteria at all, I get three hits on each category. Six in total, the oldest ones from 2004 and the newest from 2009. Where are the other eleven you mention? Searching for Netbsd BTW gives me seven hits, mostly older ones too. -- internetlabbet.se / work: +46 8 551 124 80 / Words must Benny Lofgren/ mobile: +46 70 718 11 90 / be weighed, / fax:+46 8 551 124 89/not counted. /email: benny -at- internetlabbet.se
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On 25 March 2011 09:15, David Vasek va...@fido.cz wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:02:15PM +, Glen Anderson wrote: I liked the idea of using an adjective when talking about the combined statistics however cumulative isn't really an accurate term and while ostensibly mean seems appropriate I'm unsure how top calculates that line on machines with CPUs of varying speeds. If it takes a mean of the percentages it's clearly misleading, if it does something a it cleverer use of the term mean is wrong. With this in mind I think the following tweak to Jason's suggestion would be best. i'm fine with this. anyone object? I am not in position to object or not. What I meant was to make it clear right from the man page that single line for all processors is indeed *combined* statistics for all CPU's in one set of numbers, not statistics for all individual processors somehow condensed to a single line. Perhaps word combined can be used there? Anyway, it was only a suggestion, if you think it is not relevant, simply ignore it. Glen's version is good too. combined is ok with me, it doesn't imply anything about how the figures are reached so side-steps the issues I had earlier. In the esoteric case I mentioned people will make their own (probably incorrect) assumptions with either wording. I've included a new diff making it clear that they're combined statistics. Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm happy with either of the following diffs. I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'm not holding out much hope as learn C has been gathering dust on my todo list for a while... A bit of code reading won't do me any harm though. $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new Fri Mar 25 09:28:16 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ The options are as follows: .Bl -tag -width Ds .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics on a single line instead of individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. .It Fl b Use .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ .Sq P interactive command. .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle between combined CPU statistics on a single line and individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. .It C Toggle the display of process command line arguments. .It d Ar count $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 B B B Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new B Thu Mar 24 17:59:30 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ B The options are as follows: B .Bl -tag -width Ds B .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display CPU statistics for all processors on a single line instead of one +line per CPU. B .It Fl b B Use B .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ B .Sq P B interactive command. B .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle CPU statistics between a single line for all processors and one line +per CPU. B .It C B Toggle the display of process command line arguments. B .It d Ar count
Re: kern.maxcluster
Hi there, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:37:08 -0300, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? By stop fiddling around with the sysctl's in case you're not sure what they do. Start with defaults! Then, if you hit scaling limits, change sysctls if you know what you do. If not, drop a mail to this list with more details. Like a pfctl -s all, your pf.conf and stuff like that. I bet the friendly folks on this list will come up with tips what you need to change and more importantly, with an explanation why. This way, you know what you do ;-) Cheers, Marian
Re: OBDS vs. NetBSD security
On 2011-03-25 11.14, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... :\ too many hits to count.. ...and I hit send too soon. Sorry about that. I'll repeat what I wrote and add what I meant to say in this mail: Yes, you are trolling and yes, it's a flame topic. And you know it. But I know your English isn't perfect, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. So I'll bite, just this once. First of all, I don't know how you've come up with the figures you mention. When I use the site's search form and choose openbsd or openbsd/x86 (x86 is for some reason separated from the rest of the supported architectures), and don't enter any search criteria at all, I get three hits on each category. Six in total, the oldest ones from 2004 and the newest from 2009. Where are the other eleven you mention? Searching for Netbsd BTW gives me seven hits, mostly older ones too. Second, you can't compare security track records just by counting search hits on some dubious site. You have to weigh each and every entry by their seriousness, by what kind of vulnerability (DoS, remote penetration exploit, local exploit, privilege escalation etc) and by the circumstances around each one. For example, is it the standard system that has been compromised or is it an application running on it? Third, *YOU* HAVE GOT TO DO *YOUR* HOMEWORK. We don't want to do it for you. We don't have the time to spare for ignorant questions. For most of us, time equals money in some way. You know how to find google, don't you? This isn't the first silly question you've brought to the OpenBSD lists lately, have you learned nothing from the responses (or lack of) that you have received so far? I'll give you a link. It's all you need to learn about OpenBSD, really: http://www.openbsd.org/ Click away at the links there. I promise you, behind every one is new and exciting knowledge, all for free. Regards, /Benny -- internetlabbet.se / work: +46 8 551 124 80 / Words must Benny Lofgren/ mobile: +46 70 718 11 90 / be weighed, / fax:+46 8 551 124 89/not counted. /email: benny -at- internetlabbet.se
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On 25 March 2011 09:44, Glen Anderson g.s.ander...@gmail.com wrote: Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm happy with either of the following diffs. I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'm not holding out much hope as learn C has been gathering dust on my todo list for a while... A bit of code reading won't do me any harm though. Seems like i_cpustates in display.c is taking a mean. I still think it's best to leave out any mention of it though. Personally I prefer the first patch but I'm happy with either. $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 B B B Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new B Fri Mar 25 09:28:16 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ B The options are as follows: B .Bl -tag -width Ds B .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics on a single line instead of individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. B .It Fl b B Use B .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ B .Sq P B interactive command. B .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle between combined CPU statistics on a single line and individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. B .It C B Toggle the display of process command line arguments. B .It d Ar count $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 B B B Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new B Thu Mar 24 17:59:30 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ B The options are as follows: B .Bl -tag -width Ds B .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display CPU statistics for all processors on a single line instead of one +line per CPU. B .It Fl b B Use B .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ B .Sq P B interactive command. B .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle CPU statistics between a single line for all processors and one line +per CPU. B .It C B Toggle the display of process command line arguments. B .It d Ar count
Danimarka, �sve�, Norve� ve Finlandiya olmak �zere t�m Kuzey Avrupa �lkeleri
'. Danimarka, ]sveg, Norveg ve Finlandiya olmak |zere t|m Kuzey Avrupa |lkeleri == INTERMEX ve MPS g|g birlipi ile... == iskandinavya G|gl| acenta ap}yla bvlge igerisindeki her noktaya ig nakliye, depolama, g|mr|kleme hizmetleri saplayan MPS Logistics; Danimarka, Finlandiya ve Norveg e kurulu~u 14 y}ldan bu yana MPS ile gal}~malar}n} s|rd|rmektedir. T|rkiye ]skandinavya hatt}nda kvpr| gvrevi gvren MPS bir gok vnemli firmaya hizmet vermektedir. ]sveg ve Norvege ula~}m; Bulgaristan, Slovakya, Polonya |zerinden, Finlandiyaya; Polonya |zerinden Letonya, Litvanya, Estonya g|zergahlar}ndan deniz yoluyla ve Danimarkaya Polonya ve Almanya |zerinden gergekle~mektedir. MPS Logistics komple ve parsiyel ta~}malarda: * ]sveg: 6 8 g|n * Norveg Finlandiya: 7 9 g|n * Danimarka: 6 7 g|n transit s|releriyle hizmet vermektedir. Bu hizmet, g|mr|kl| ve ticari gvnderileri kapsamaktad}r. Firman}z}n gvnderi hacmi ne olursa olsun, en uygun lojistik gvz|mlerini INTERMEX lde bulabilirsiniz. Firman}z}n sektvr|ne vzel gvz|mlerden yararlanmak ve benzersiz fiyat avantaj}ndan faydalanabilmeniz igin l|tfen yukar}daki k}sa formu eksiksiz doldurun. M|~teri temsilcimiz en k}sa zamanda sizinle irtibata gegecektir. Fiyat almak igin l|tfen y|k detaylar}n}z} : i...@mpscargo.com adresine gvnderiniz. .' Gok Vzel tan}t}m fiyatlar}m}zdan yararlanmak igin a~ap}daki formu bize gvndermeniz yeterli olacakt}r.Abonelik ba~vurusu E-B|lteni almak istemiyorsan}z l|tfen buray} t}klay}n}z. Capr} Merkezi 444 0 108 Telefon +90 (212) 444 0 108 (DHL- 120) Fax +90 (212) 573 21 84 E-Mail ha...@mpscargo.com Web Adresi www.mpscargo.com [IMAGE]
Re: OBDS vs. NetBSD security
Regarding your other posts here on misc@ and around Internet on many sites you sounds like modern script kittie - give me all info I need because I don't want to learn anything, I'm just looking for bugs in concrete apps to start my exploits ;-) On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, johhny_at_poland77 johhny_at_polan...@zoho.com wrote: If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... :\ too many hits to count.. Thank you in anticipation.
Re: kern.maxcluster
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:24:16 -0300, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks all of you, I really don't know how some options of sysctl.conf works, I turn back the option to default values and follow the considerations of https://calomel.org/network_performance.html [1]. I'm using OpenBSD 4.8. As some pointed out, they take calomel.org's articles with scepticism. I had a good read of that article and it sounds reasonable to me. Question to the OpenBSD network gurus: Can one follow this specific article on calomel.org or not? If not, where are the mistakes? :) Hope I'm not asking too much here :) Cheers, Marian
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:44:33AM +, Glen Anderson wrote: combined is ok with me, it doesn't imply anything about how the figures are reached so side-steps the issues I had earlier. In the esoteric case I mentioned people will make their own (probably incorrect) assumptions with either wording. I've included a new diff making it clear that they're combined statistics. Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm happy with either of the following diffs. I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'm not holding out much hope as learn C has been gathering dust on my todo list for a while... A bit of code reading won't do me any harm though. $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new Fri Mar 25 09:28:16 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ The options are as follows: .Bl -tag -width Ds .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics on a single line instead of individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. .It Fl b Use .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ .Sq P interactive command. .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle between combined CPU statistics on a single line and individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. .It C Toggle the display of process command line arguments. .It d Ar count ok, i committed a diff, but a little bit different to the one above. funny how the simple diffs can make your head hurt most. in this case i'm not sure i like the idea of toggling between states. i think you toggle something on or off. god knows though. anyway i settled on the diff below once i got fed up staring at the screen. jmc Index: top.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/top/top.1,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -r1.57 top.1 --- top.1 10 Aug 2010 20:34:16 - 1.57 +++ top.1 25 Mar 2011 12:52:58 - @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ The options are as follows: .Bl -tag -width Ds .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics for all processors on a single line +instead of one line per CPU. .It Fl b Use .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ .Sq P interactive command. .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle the display of CPU statistics. .It C Toggle the display of process command line arguments. .It d Ar count
OpenBSD MAC ACL
Hi list. I'm looking for a software that performs controls based on MAC ACL for access to the network and that possible detects ARP poisoning and block it with pf. There is this software for OpenBSD? Thanks in advance.
Re: GENERIC.MP cold reboot at savecore
On 25.3.2011 P3. 11:00 Q., iridaoc iribag wrote: Hello same problem here on DELL PowerEdge R210. Starting with OpenBSD 4.8 Release was Ok. Applying patchs one by one until patch 006_cbc.patch System cold reboots with this patch. Back to kernel GENERIC.MP 4.8 release + patchs : 001_bgpd.patch, 002_pci.patch, 003_vr.patch, 004_openssl.patch 005_pf.patch, is Ok. 2011/3/24 Kapetanakis Giannisbil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr I've tested a while ago the GENERIC.MP kernel of 4.8-stable and the system cold reboots. GENERIC runs fine. Trying to regenerate the problem I went into single user more and found out that it reboots when it executes /sbin/savecore /var/crash I tried ktrace but the dump was empty. I also tried disabling apm without luck. Any way to debug this? Attaching the dmesg. Thanx Giannis Hello, Also, problem installing 4.8 -stable as of March 06 by PXE on DELL 1655MC. The server just reboots after it gets ip address. Installing 4.8 Release without problem. Regards, Ivo
Re: kern.maxcluster
Thanks all of you, I really don't know how some options of sysctl.conf works, I turn back the option to default values and follow the considerations of https://calomel.org/network_performance.html. I'm using OpenBSD 4.8. Thanks guys 2011/3/25 Marian Hettwer m...@kernel32.de Hi there, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:37:08 -0300, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error on message: Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters But, both firewalls crash, How can I fix this? By stop fiddling around with the sysctl's in case you're not sure what they do. Start with defaults! Then, if you hit scaling limits, change sysctls if you know what you do. If not, drop a mail to this list with more details. Like a pfctl -s all, your pf.conf and stuff like that. I bet the friendly folks on this list will come up with tips what you need to change and more importantly, with an explanation why. This way, you know what you do ;-) Cheers, Marian [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-gzip which had a name of pfctl.out.gz]
Re: kern.maxcluster
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote: * lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru [2011-03-25 11:06]: why so many people hate calomel.org? hate? no. ditch, because the recommendations there are bullshit. Still the chick there on da homepage is sooo sexy ahahah
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:42:48PM +, Glen Anderson wrote: I agree that the wording in previous diffs was a bit awkward however using the same wording as the C, I, S and T commands suggests that CPU statistics will either be on or off. Toggle the display of CPU statistics between the states described in the -1 option. might be better. i'm aware of that but i think the fact that -1 and `1' are obviously tied, and the commonsense element (you can just press 1 and see what happens), means that the very brief description suffices. i guess we can look at changing it if floods of people suddenly get confused. jmc
Re: OpenBSD MAC ACL
here: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html Is a good point to start your journey Regards, 2011/3/25 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com Hi list. I'm looking for a software that performs controls based on MAC ACL for access to the network and that possible detects ARP poisoning and block it with pf. There is this software for OpenBSD? Thanks in advance.
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On 25 March 2011 12:54, Jason McIntyre j...@cava.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:44:33AM +, Glen Anderson wrote: combined is ok with me, it doesn't imply anything about how the figures are reached so side-steps the issues I had earlier. In the esoteric case I mentioned people will make their own (probably incorrect) assumptions with either wording. I've included a new diff making it clear that they're combined statistics. Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm happy with either of the following diffs. I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'm not holding out much hope as learn C has been gathering dust on my todo list for a while... A bit of code reading won't do me any harm though. $ diff -u top.1 top.1.new --- top.1 B B B Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011 +++ top.1.new B Fri Mar 25 09:28:16 2011 @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ B The options are as follows: B .Bl -tag -width Ds B .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics on a single line instead of individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. B .It Fl b B Use B .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ B .Sq P B interactive command. B .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle between combined CPU statistics on a single line and individual CPU +statistics on multiple lines. B .It C B Toggle the display of process command line arguments. B .It d Ar count ok, i committed a diff, but a little bit different to the one above. funny how the simple diffs can make your head hurt most. in this case i'm not sure i like the idea of toggling between states. i think you toggle something on or off. god knows though. anyway i settled on the diff below once i got fed up staring at the screen. jmc I'm happy with that diff, and don't think anymore time should be spent on something that people will very likely be playing with while reading the man page however I need to put this out there to stop my head hurting! I agree that the wording in previous diffs was a bit awkward however using the same wording as the C, I, S and T commands suggests that CPU statistics will either be on or off. Toggle the display of CPU statistics between the states described in the -1 option. might be better. I'm going to drop this now and get back to more important things that also make my head hurt. Index: top.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/top/top.1,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -r1.57 top.1 --- top.1 B B B 10 Aug 2010 20:34:16 - B B B 1.57 +++ top.1 B B B 25 Mar 2011 12:52:58 - @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ B The options are as follows: B .Bl -tag -width Ds B .It Fl 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Display combined CPU statistics for all processors on a single line +instead of one line per CPU. B .It Fl b B Use B .Em batch @@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ B .Sq P B interactive command. B .It 1 -Display CPU statistics on a single line instead of a line per CPU. +Toggle the display of CPU statistics. B .It C B Toggle the display of process command line arguments. B .It d Ar count
ifstated body executing before init?
Hi,
According to ifstated.conf(5)
The init block is used to initialise the state and is executed each
time the state is entered.
This should be the first thing to be executed right? In debug I see the
body executed first.
Isn't the code bellow more reasonable?
--- /tmp/ifstated.c Fri Mar 25 16:32:13 2011
+++ ifstated.c Fri Mar 25 16:32:24 2011
@@ -543,9 +543,9 @@
conf-curstate = conf-nextstate;
conf-nextstate = NULL;
conf-curstate-entered = time(NULL);
+ do_action(conf-curstate-init);
external_evtimer_setup(conf-curstate, IFSD_EVTIMER_ADD);
adjust_external_expressions(conf-curstate);
- do_action(conf-curstate-init);
return (1);
}
return (0);
Also one more thing. In the state bellow:
state promoted {
init {
run ifconfig carp0 advskew 101
run ifconfig carp1 advskew 101
}
if $net
set-state primary
if ! $net $peer
set-state backup
}
Both expressions in the body are evaluated the first time we enter the
state. Why?
If first expression is true, shouldn't we go directly on primary state
without evaluating second if?
thanx
Giannis
Re: OpenBSD MAC ACL
Il 25/03/2011 14:28, R0me0 *** ha scritto: here: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html Is a good point to start your journey Regards, 2011/3/25 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com mailto:alessandro.ba...@gmail.com Hi list. I'm looking for a software that performs controls based on MAC ACL for access to the network and that possible detects ARP poisoning and block it with pf. There is this software for OpenBSD? Thanks in advance. thanks, if there are not misunderstanding it is only for filter MAC address and this is for bridge. It's possible make association between IP and MAC?
Re: top man page, clarification of interactive command 1
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Glen Anderson g.s.ander...@gmail.com wrote: Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm happy with either of the following diffs. I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'm not Nothing special. This is like the third time these mythical asymmetric MP systems have come up. I suggest we let the first person to actually acquire such hardware fret about what's going to happen, should that day ever occur.
Best advice for a link aggregation setup
Hello misc.. im currently helping a friend on a link aggregation setup based on 4.8 with 2 links from the same ISP, so we have followed a bunch of faqs/how-to's but the fact is that we're in the middle of a bunch questions too. So it would be nice if you guys can help us to clear some doubs, take the right actions if required to. 1) What do we actually need to make sure a link aggregation setup will work?, you should know that we got a server HP proliant with only 1 pci port so the nic is an Intel Dual Gbit port (em0/em1) the nic facing the LAN is the onboard one and use the bge driver (bge0), and from the same ISP we got two ADSL links of 2048 mb each 2) Must the two ADSL links support a special feature like bonding or something like that? Cheers.. -- * *
Re: kern.maxcluster
On 2011-03-25, Marian Hettwer m...@kernel32.de wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:24:16 -0300, Kleber Rocha kli...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks all of you, I really don't know how some options of sysctl.conf works, I turn back the option to default values and follow the considerations of https://calomel.org/network_performance.html [1]. I'm using OpenBSD 4.8. As some pointed out, they take calomel.org's articles with scepticism. I had a good read of that article and it sounds reasonable to me. Question to the OpenBSD network gurus: Can one follow this specific article on calomel.org or not? Not. If not, where are the mistakes? :) The whole premise of the article is wrong. If there were simple tweaks that could be done blindly that would improve things, they would be done by default. Even the simple bump net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen so often quoted (which is indeed useful in some cases) has drawbacks, without even considering the some of the exponentially increase your KVM use settings the article talks about.
Evaluación Gratis de tu Página Web
Si no puede ver esta imagen, haga clic en el siguiente link para ver la versiC3n online http://www.panamacorreo.com/mail/display.php?M=176375C=45ce1208ba75b76cbc4c66d66bf5a405S=13L=1N=6 Copyright 2011 - Todos los Derechos Reservados Este es un mensaje directo y legal, enviado a su email por contrataciC3n del cliente que se anuncia. El contenido de este correo es responsabilidad del anunciante quien asume responsabilidad total por cualquier oferta contenida en este correo Si usted estC! recibiendo esta promociC3n exclusiva, es debido a que es parte de los tC)rminos del servicio aceptado cuando usted se registra, alguien lo refiere, o nos contacta, en cualquier parte de nuestra red, o de sitios afiliados. Este email incluye una forma para que usted no reciba informaciC3n en el futuro y no es anC3nimo. Si usted desea salir de nuestra base de datos de usuarios en forma definitiva por favor hacer clic aquC- para eliminar permanentemente su suscripciC3n. Si usted decidiC3 salir de nuestra base de datos y sigue recibiendo esta informaciC3n debe estar registrado con otra cuenta de email diferente a esta. Respetamos su derecho de privacidad y le invitamos a darse de baja de nuestra lista de correos si no desea recibir promociones, You have received this email because at some point we indicated interest in us promoting or recommended by other users or our partners web sites. We respect your right and invite you to unsubscribe from our mailing list if you want to receive promotions, Unsubscribe me from this list http://www.panamacorreo.com/mail/unsubscribe.php?M=176375C=45ce1208ba75b76cbc4c66d66bf5a405L=1N=13
Re: OpenBSD 4.9 pre-orders
Yeah - this is a good question... Normally I get an American XL and that is fine. How do these compare? /me has CC out... -- Jeremy Chase http://twitter.com/jeremychase On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Henrik Engmark h...@tti.se wrote: I am kind of uncertain about Canadian clothes sizes. I am 187 centimetres tall, and I weigh in at about 100 kilos. In other words, quite the fat bloke. What size hoodie would you recommend, X, XX or XXX? On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:10:02 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: I've turned on OpenBSD 4.9 pre-orders. Support us by buying something please. These sales are a part of keeping the project going. As for clothing... there's going to be a black hoodie this time.
Re: OpenBSD MAC ACL
YEAP, You sign mac on brigde filter and associate it in pf.conf example: on bridge: pass in on rl0 src aa:bb:cc:dd:ee tag server on pf.conf pass in log on rl0 inet proto tcp from 10.20.30.40 tagged server Regards, 2011/3/25 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com Il 25/03/2011 14:28, R0me0 *** ha scritto: here: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html Is a good point to start your journey Regards, 2011/3/25 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com mailto: alessandro.ba...@gmail.com Hi list. I'm looking for a software that performs controls based on MAC ACL for access to the network and that possible detects ARP poisoning and block it with pf. There is this software for OpenBSD? Thanks in advance. thanks, if there are not misunderstanding it is only for filter MAC address and this is for bridge. It's possible make association between IP and MAC?
pfsync failover issues
I'm using pfsync to keep state between two OpenBSD 4.7 firewalls running on soekris devices. The problem is that it seems to work erratically. My test is to download a large file via HTTP from a server behind the firewalls and then reboot the master firewall and once that comes back up, the backup, and repeat. Sometimes the file transfer dies immediately on the first reboot and sometimes it survives a full cycle of reboots or more. Is my test faulty? I just want to verify that state sharing is or is not working, instead I find it works in an unpredictable manner. I have seen the same results in a virtual test environment and with multiple devices in different environments.
Negociacion en la Cobranza para una Efectiva Recuperacion de la Cartera en MERIDA - MEX - GDL
CURSO TALLER Negociacion en la Cobranza para una Efectiva Recuperacion de la Cartera Experto instructor: Lic. Juan Manuel Lopez Vitela ) Duracion: (1 dia) 8 hrs. Inversion: $ 4,150 pesos mas IVA OBJETIVO: Con este curso los participantes: Adquiriran una formacisn integral en los documentos que soportan nuestra gestisn de cobranza. A la vez contempla el desarrollo de habilidades personales tales como auto motivacisn, perder el miedo a cobrar, tolerancia a la frustracisn y manejo de emociones que les permita enfrentar adecuadamente al deudor y llevar a cabo un proceso exitoso de negociacisn. Aplicando herramientas y ticnicas practicas que desarrollara en este taller de cobranza. MERIDA MEXICO, D.F. GUADALAJARA 02 de Abril Solicite Temario de Click Aqui 06 de Abril Solicite Temario de Click Aqui 12 de Abril Solicite Temario de Click Aqui Credito y Cobranza [IMAGE] Curso Taller Desarrollo de Proyectos mediante el ABC del Credito y la Cobranza Mexico / Guadalajara / Monterrey [IMAGE] Curso Taller La Mujer como Factor del Microcredito en Actividades Productivas Mexico / Guadalajara / Monterrey [IMAGE] Curso Taller Administracion del Riesgo en el Credito y sus Implicaciones en la Cobranza Mexico / Guadalajara / Monterrey [IMAGE] Curso Taller Tecnicas especializadas en los procesos de credito y cobranza Mexico / Guadalajara / Monterrey [IMAGE] Curso Taller Herramientas Especializadas para el Control y Recuperacion de la Cartera Vencida Mexico / Guadalajara / Monterrey Consulte la Programacion por Area: Manufactura y Produccion | Credito y Cobranza | Recursos Humanos | Adquisiciones y Obras Publicas | Entrenamiento Ejecutivo | Seguridad e Higiene | Negociacion y Compras | Alimentos y Bebidas | Economia y Finanzas | Asistentes Ejecutivas | Marketing y Ventas | Si necesita mayor informacion,comuniquese un Asesor lo atendera de inmediato. SIMCA CAPACITACION Entrenamiento Especializado E-MAIL: simca_capacitac...@hotmail.com Messenger: simca_capacitac...@hotmail.com Lada sin costo: 01 800 543 32 30 Servicios de Informacion Mexicana Capacitando America Diseqamos el curso a la medida de sus necesidades..!Impartimos CURSOS de forma PRIVADA en su empresa, envienos un correo especificando el numero de participantes, el lugar donde se impartira, su nombre, cargo, empresa y telefono.SOLICITE COTIZACION de Click Aqui Si usted no desea que le enviemos mas invitaciones, de Click Aqui, gracias.
Re: OpenBSD 4.9 pre-orders
Here in Canada there is no standard for clothes that are sold in S,M,L,XL,XXL,etc sizes. Actual size/fit varies by manufacturer. Theo: Are hoodies and T-shirts made by same company? If yes, there is a better chance of knowing in advance if XXL hoodie is made in same size as XXL T-shirt. What size you get/like also depends on how tight you want the fit to be. On 03/18/11 03:55, Henrik Engmark wrote: I am kind of uncertain about Canadian clothes sizes. I am 187 centimetres tall, and I weigh in at about 100 kilos. In other words, quite the fat bloke. What size hoodie would you recommend, X, XX or XXX? On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:10:02 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: I've turned on OpenBSD 4.9 pre-orders. Support us by buying something please. These sales are a part of keeping the project going. As for clothing... there's going to be a black hoodie this time.
Re: OBDS vs. NetBSD security
I might need to switch my firewalls soon. what do you mean? :O Be Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:12:50 -0700 Bryan Irvine C-rta On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... : too many hits to count.. JigglyPuffBSD doesn't have anything at all listed on that site. I might need to switch my firewalls soon. -Bryan
Oxford PCI-e serial card support?
Hi, I've recently purchased a 16-port PCI-e serial card with Oxford UARTs. OpenBSD 4.8 detects the Oxford chips, but doesn't seem to be able to use the 'unknown product 0xc308'. This thread http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg100575.html implies that most of the steps to support this card may have already been taken. What would be required to get official support for this card on OpenBSD? I'm open to allowing access to a machine with it installed. Other relevant information: Chip Number: OXPCIe958 Chip Description: Octo UARTs (as per http://www.pcidatabase.com/vendor_details.php?id=674 ) Thanks!
Re: OBDS vs. NetBSD security
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, johhny_at_poland77 johhny_at_polan...@zoho.com wrote: If i search for the two words: OpenBSD and NetBSD on: http://www.exploit-db.com/ then i get 17 hits regarding security bugs on OpenBSD, and 8 hits regarding security bugs on NetBSD. So what are the differences exactly in the _REALITY_? Anybody has any links, that how does NetBSD and OpenBSD audit their code? :O I'm not trolling, just want the real security! It's not a flame topic.. p.s: if i search for FreeBSD... :\ too many hits to count.. JigglyPuffBSD doesn't have anything at all listed on that site. I might need to switch my firewalls soon. -Bryan
mplayer video sluggish with Radeon HD 4200
Hi, I'm having an issue where video playback in mplayer is sluggish in full-screen mode with Radeon HD 4200 onboard video. This applies only to -current, with either i386 or amd64. In 4.8-stable (amd64 or i386), Mplayer is perfectly fine in either normal or full-screen mode on the same hardware. x.org.conf, dmesg, xdpyinfo and xvinfo files are below. Mplayer is the same version between 4.8 and -current, but the X.Org version goes from 1.8.2 to 1.9.3. Googling for mplayer + x.org 1.9.3 + radeon hd 4200 doesn't yield anything useful, and the archives only offer tedu@'s post about using gl instead of x11 for Intel chipsets. I've tried all vo= modes available, including x11, xv, gl and gl2. x11 works best, but video playback appears to be somewhat less than 1.00 speed. All frames appear correctly without any distortion, just slower than normal, as if the frame rate was lowered. Audio is fine but out of sync, of course. Has anyone else experienced similar problems / found solutions? I can't find any setting in the man page that corrects this behaviour, but it's worth noting that for full-screen to work, the zoom=1 setting has to be enabled, even for -stable. I'm out of gas on this. - Scott xvinfo for both -current and 4.8-stable only gives: $ cat xvinfo.output X-Video Extension version 2.2 screen #0 no adaptors present xorg.conf: Section ServerLayout Identifier X.org Configured Screen 0 Screen0 0 0 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard EndSection Section Files ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/ EndSection Section Module Load dbe Load dri Load dri2 Load extmod Load glx Load record EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol wsmouse Option Device /dev/wsmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 6 7 EndSection Section Monitor #DisplaySize 450 280 # mm Identifier Monitor0 VendorName HWP ModelNameHP f2105 HorizSync30.0 - 94.0 VertRefresh 48.0 - 85.0 Option DPMS EndSection Section Device ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: i: integer, f: float, bool: True/False, ### string: String, freq: f Hz/kHz/MHz, ### percent: f% ### [arg]: arg optional #Option NoAccel # [bool] #Option SWcursor # [bool] #Option Dac6Bit # [bool] #Option Dac8Bit # [bool] #Option BusType # [str] #Option CPPIOMode # [bool] #Option CPusecTimeout # i #Option AGPMode # i #Option AGPFastWrite # [bool] #Option AGPSize # i #Option GARTSize # i #Option RingSize # i #Option BufferSize# i #Option EnableDepthMoves # [bool] #Option EnablePageFlip# [bool] #Option NoBackBuffer # [bool] #Option DMAForXv # [bool] #Option FBTexPercent # i #Option DepthBits # i #Option PCIAPERSize # i #Option AccelDFS # [bool] #Option IgnoreEDID# [bool] #Option DisplayPriority # [str] #Option PanelSize # [str] #Option ForceMinDotClock # freq #Option ColorTiling # [bool] #Option VideoKey # i #Option RageTheatreCrystal# i #Option RageTheatreTunerPort # i #Option RageTheatreCompositePort # i #Option RageTheatreSVideoPort # i #Option TunerType # i #Option RageTheatreMicrocPath # str #Option RageTheatreMicrocType # str #Option ScalerWidth # i #Option RenderAccel # [bool] #Option SubPixelOrder # [str] #Option ShowCache # [bool] #Option DynamicClocks # [bool] #Option VGAAccess # [bool] #Option
COMPUTERSYS - Mais de 9000 produtos ? sua escolha e ao melhor PRE?O
O presente e-mail destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar actuais ou potenciais clientes e nco deve ser considerado SPAM. Ao abrigo do Decreto-Lei n.o 7/2004, de 7 de Janeiro, de regulagco do tratamento automatizado de dados de caracter pessoal, o utilizador podera cancelar os mesmos. O e-mail nco podera ser considerado SPAM quando incluir uma forma do receptor ser removido da lista. Se pretender remover o seu e-mail, deve efectuar essa anulagco pelo mesmo enderego que se encontra na nossa base de dados, de outra forma ficaremos impossibilitados de o eliminar. Se nco pretende continuar a receber este tipo de informagco por e-mail, Clique Aqui ---
Re: mplayer video sluggish with Radeon HD 4200
On 03/25/11 19:47, Scott McEachern wrote: dmesg: OpenBSD 4.9-current (BLACKSTAFF.MP) #1: Wed Mar 23 23:22:50 EDT 2011 sc...@blackstaff.blackstaff.ca:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/BLACKSTAFF.MP Sorry, I posted the dmesg for a system with POOL_DEBUG disabled. There is no dmesg difference between it and GENERIC.MP, but the diff is below anyway. The problem remains the same. This is using -current from anoncvs as of about two hours ago. I also forgot to mention I've tried playback with -framedrop and yes, the video is in sync with the audio, but looks like crap with a bunch of frames missing. Go figure. :) - Scott dmesg diff from previous message: (the iic0 values change on every boot anyway) OpenBSD 4.9-current (BLACKSTAFF.MP) #1: Wed Mar 23 23:22:50 EDT 2011 sc...@blackstaff.blackstaff.ca:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/BLACKSTAFF.MP --- OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri Mar 25 20:56:58 EDT 2011 sc...@blackstaff.blackstaff.ca:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP 89c89 iic0: addr 0x20 01=19 02=24 03=2e 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 09=00 0a=10 0b=10 0c=10 0d=10 0e=16 0f=88 10=3d 11=00 12=00 13=00 14=0a 15=0a 16=2c 17=a0 18=e0 1a=ae 1b=a4 1c=b3 1d=00 1e=0c 1f=01 20=09 21=09 22=09 23=09 24=bb 3e=03 words 00=ff19 01=1924 02=242e 03=2e00 04= 05= 06= 07= --- iic0: addr 0x20 01=19 02=24 03=2e 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 09=00 0a=10 0b=10 0c=10 0d=10 0e=16 0f=88 10=3d 11=00 12=00 13=00 14=0a 15=0a 16=2b 17=a0 18=e0 1a=ae 1b=a4 1c=b3 1d=00 1e=0c 1f=01 20=09 21=09 22=09 23=09 24=bb 3e=03 words 00=ff19 01=1924 02=242e 03=2e00 04= 05= 06= 07=
