Re: PLEASE STOP NOW! (Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world')
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Magnusson wrote: > I do not want to start moderating the mail that goes to the > pcc-list. Please spend the time finding and fixing bugs in pcc > instead. If anyone of you have personal issues with each other, DO > NOT DISCUSS IT HERE. > > And, as Kjell Wooding wrote, I can top-post to the mailing list as > much as I want :-) > > -- Ragge I took this off the PCC list (by request). I figured I would share an article as I think that it pertains (and might help convince some that others here aren't degenerate or offensive lunatics): http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i0uWMHXnLI6Ob4YfsDQU8BC8Vtvg http://www.infoniac.com/science/swearing-workplace-boosts-productivity.html - -- Coleman Kane Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHLjpGcMSxQcXat5cRAuXcAJoCVMAdZLVU+eL+mlLZeXiZv3EvjQCfbpax W66InowanQPlmjLFJ44WF0U= =/nxt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: Timo iD8DBQFHLecDUY3eBSqOgOMRCu7WAKCtwy0qC/TmhZqzIbMKZEPy0+uqAgCffh+C Yg7jMg1F+EvUiK4xPprWiSI= =qMJx -END PGP SIGNATURE- Stop fucking signing mails to a public list that is BEYOND fucking annoying and all by itself proves that you're a clueless fuckwit. STFU and GTFO.
PLEASE STOP NOW! (Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world')
I do not want to start moderating the mail that goes to the pcc-list. Please spend the time finding and fixing bugs in pcc instead. If anyone of you have personal issues with each other, DO NOT DISCUSS IT HERE. And, as Kjell Wooding wrote, I can top-post to the mailing list as much as I want :-) -- Ragge Tony Abernethy skrev: On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: What part of my email did *you* read None. My understanding is that it is demented gibberish.
Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
> > On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > > What part of my email did *you* read None. My understanding is that it is demented gibberish.
Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: > What part of my email did *you* read _and_ understand? Obviously _not_ > the part that I _like_ OpenBSD, but I _dislike_ how it's being > destroyed? :) Then fork OpenBSD. Sitting here and whining about how it is "being destroyed" just makes you look like a jerk. BSD puts the power in the your hands to fix things when you don't like how they are going. This is done by forking. If everything was a perfect world, then there would only be one version of BSD which solved everybody's problems, one distribution of Linux which solved everybody's problems, etcetera, but it isn't. If you're not willing to fork, or provide objective criticism of something other than "Theo is an asshole" (I mean come on, we've heard about this for like 15+ years), then that makes you an asshole too. While Theo might not have the best etiquette, at least he gives a damn, and really when it comes to it, that's all that matters, because BSD and free software in general are about _computing_, not manners and etiquette. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:17:53 -0600: > On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > What part of my email did *you* read _and_ understand? Obviously > > _not_ the part that I _like_ OpenBSD, but I _dislike_ how it's being > > destroyed? :) > > Then fork OpenBSD. No reason. > Sitting here and whining about how it is "being > destroyed" just makes you look like a jerk. First, I'm not whining. I pointed something out. That's a big difference even a developer should know. (I do.) Second, it does not really affect _me_ if OpenBSD passes by. But it will affect others. Being Cassandra always was a job nobody wanted to have. > BSD puts the power in the > your hands to fix things when you don't like how they are going. This > is done by forking. Then why don't you fork instead of answering to this email? > If everything was a perfect world, then there > would only be one version of BSD which solved everybody's problems, > one distribution of Linux which solved everybody's problems, > etcetera, but it isn't. (No. There were no computers.) > If you're not willing to fork, or provide objective criticism What part of my email did you actually read _and_ understand? (I like this sentence!) > of > something other than "Theo is an asshole" I _did_ _not_ _write_ this. > (I mean come on, we've heard > about this for like 15+ years), Obviously, there must be a reason for this, no? > then that makes you an asshole too. Logic. > While Theo might not have the best etiquette, at least he gives a > damn, and really when it comes to it, that's all that matters, > because BSD and free software in general are about _computing_, not > manners and etiquette. What a tiny world you live in. Who uses computers? Think of Henry Ford. Best wishes, Timo iD8DBQFHLecDUY3eBSqOgOMRCu7WAKCtwy0qC/TmhZqzIbMKZEPy0+uqAgCffh+C Yg7jMg1F+EvUiK4xPprWiSI= =qMJx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thus Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:15:27 +0100: > Timo Schoeler wrote: > > Thus Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Thu, 01 Nov 2007 > > 05:43:06 -0600: > > > >> Where's the diffs Timo? > > > >> Are you going to continue preaching bullshit, and then not showing > >> diffs? > > > > (Please see the bottom of the email for my reply. As it used to be.) > [massive fullquote] > > > > Hi list, hi Theo, > [OT rant] > > Who are you to complain about top-posting and then running in a > fullquote? A member of this fucking email lists. :) > Who are you to waste precious developer time by writing > such a nonsensical mail to multiple(!) mailing lists? Dito. > Who are you > wanting to teach manners to a grown up? Ouch. Who is the grown up? Theo? No, he continually uses the language of a three-year-old child stuck in the anal phase. You? No. Grown ups are able to _discuss_. You are not. > Your goal might be noble, See. > but in this context you're nothing but a troll, since the moment you > appeared on this list. Fuck! (sic) Ah. That hurts s much. > Grow up and ignore the stuff you > don't like or simply walk away. What part of my email did *you* read _and_ understand? Obviously _not_ the part that I _like_ OpenBSD, but I _dislike_ how it's being destroyed? :) > That was the last brownie from me, no more food for you. I don't take food from you either, so don't mind. > simon Have a nice day! Timo iD8DBQFHLb11UY3eBSqOgOMRCmiwAJ0fRAsQjz5kcPBYShgSpwlfPtDBoACfQ3a7 tjCaqEDTHALSAi72YwGdbWg= =tOjm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
OT: Re: Theo's new compiler and etiquette both in cyberspace and the 'real world'
Timo Schoeler wrote: > Thus Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Thu, 01 Nov 2007 > 05:43:06 -0600: > >> Where's the diffs Timo? > >> Are you going to continue preaching bullshit, and then not showing >> diffs? > > (Please see the bottom of the email for my reply. As it used to be.) [massive fullquote] > > Hi list, hi Theo, [OT rant] Who are you to complain about top-posting and then running in a fullquote? Who are you to waste precious developer time by writing such a nonsensical mail to multiple(!) mailing lists? Who are you wanting to teach manners to a grown up? Your goal might be noble, but in this context you're nothing but a troll, since the moment you appeared on this list. Fuck! (sic) Grow up and ignore the stuff you don't like or simply walk away. That was the last brownie from me, no more food for you. simon [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
