-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thus William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:17:53 -0600:
> On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:39 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > What part of my email did *you* read _and_ understand? Obviously > > _not_ the part that I _like_ OpenBSD, but I _dislike_ how it's being > > destroyed? :) > > Then fork OpenBSD. No reason. > Sitting here and whining about how it is "being > destroyed" just makes you look like a jerk. First, I'm not whining. I pointed something out. That's a big difference even a developer should know. (I do.) Second, it does not really affect _me_ if OpenBSD passes by. But it will affect others. Being Cassandra always was a job nobody wanted to have. > BSD puts the power in the > your hands to fix things when you don't like how they are going. This > is done by forking. Then why don't you fork instead of answering to this email? > If everything was a perfect world, then there > would only be one version of BSD which solved everybody's problems, > one distribution of Linux which solved everybody's problems, > etcetera, but it isn't. (No. There were no computers.) > If you're not willing to fork, or provide objective criticism What part of my email did you actually read _and_ understand? (I like this sentence!) > of > something other than "Theo is an asshole" I _did_ _not_ _write_ this. > (I mean come on, we've heard > about this for like 15+ years), Obviously, there must be a reason for this, no? > then that makes you an asshole too. Logic. > While Theo might not have the best etiquette, at least he gives a > damn, and really when it comes to it, that's all that matters, > because BSD and free software in general are about _computing_, not > manners and etiquette. What a tiny world you live in. Who uses computers? Think of Henry Ford. Best wishes, Timo iD8DBQFHLecDUY3eBSqOgOMRCu7WAKCtwy0qC/TmhZqzIbMKZEPy0+uqAgCffh+C Yg7jMg1F+EvUiK4xPprWiSI= =qMJx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
