full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Adi Fairbank

Does anyone know of a good customizable, user-friendly, online database
application, preferably mod_perl-based?  I want to migrate a small Access
database to MySQL with a web interface, for added features and room for
growth.  Has anyone come across a good open source project or toolkit that
would make this job really easy?

TIA,
-Adi




[Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Haase-Thomas

Hi all,

maybe this is going to be a little off topic, but it won't take you much 
time:

I am quite certain that recently I saw a server response code concerning 
forwarding. It may have looked like HTTP_DOCUMENT_FORWARDED or anything 
alike. Silly enough I can't recall where I saw it (or whether I even 
just dreamt it), so my questions are:

1. Has anyone ever seen that ghost before?
2. If I'm right, what is the correct memnonic, what's its code - and: 
where an I find it? perl5.6.1-Apache::Constants::Exports.pm doesn't 
mention it.

Hope it wasn't all just a dream...

thx
M

-- 
   http://www.meome.de
---
Martin Haase-Thomas |Tel.: +49 30 43730-558
meOme AG|Fax.: +49 30 43730-555
Software Development|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---





Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Issac Goldstand

I've actually USED Ms Access for just this purpose on a few occasions... 
 It's a lot easier to do using the GUI...

  Issac

Adi Fairbank wrote:

Does anyone know of a good customizable, user-friendly, online database
application, preferably mod_perl-based?  I want to migrate a small Access
database to MySQL with a web interface, for added features and room for
growth.  Has anyone come across a good open source project or toolkit that
would make this job really easy?

TIA,
-Adi







Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen

At 05:55 24.04.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Chuck Goehring wrote:
Stas/Everyone,
To follow up.  With the starting and stopping of Apache and looking at the
log, I see entries like Child 1032: Waiting for 250 worker threads to
exit.  I was gettiong Low virtual memory errors from Win/2000, so I added
ThreadsPerChild 24 to the http.conf.  This makes it stop quicker and use a
whole lot less memory.  Also, the error at the browser comes back faster.

Why did you have it set to 250 in first place? For testing set it to just 
a few
to have the minimal overhead.

The default (on Win32 Apache anyways) is 250. So it's what people will 
usually keep if they don't know about it. Maybe a note in the docs?


-- 
Per Einar Ellefsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen

At 07:44 24.04.2002, Martin Haase-Thomas wrote:
Hi all,

maybe this is going to be a little off topic, but it won't take you much time:

I am quite certain that recently I saw a server response code concerning 
forwarding. It may have looked like HTTP_DOCUMENT_FORWARDED or anything 
alike. Silly enough I can't recall where I saw it (or whether I even just 
dreamt it), so my questions are:

1. Has anyone ever seen that ghost before?
2. If I'm right, what is the correct memnonic, what's its code - and: 
where an I find it? perl5.6.1-Apache::Constants::Exports.pm doesn't mention it.

Hope it wasn't all just a dream...

Must have been :) Apache::Constants doesn't mention anything about FORWARD, 
neither does httpd.h. There is DOCUMENT_FOLLOWS, but that's got nothing to 
do with it.

What do you mean by forwarding anyway? Like redirect?


-- 
Per Einar Ellefsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-help

2002-04-24 Thread Cornelius.Kuschnereit
Title: Nachricht






Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Ernest Lergon

Martin Haase-Thomas wrote:
 
 I am quite certain that recently I saw a server response code concerning
 forwarding. It may have looked like HTTP_DOCUMENT_FORWARDED or anything
 alike.
 
Hi Martin,

just a guess: Do you mean the header entry 'X-Forwarded-For' ?

See

http://take23.org/docs/guide/scenario.xml/8

Ernest


-- 

*
* VIRTUALITAS Inc.   *  *
**  *
* European Consultant Office *  http://www.virtualitas.net  *
* Internationales Handelszentrum *   contact:Ernest Lergon  *
* Friedrichstraße 95 *mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* 10117 Berlin / Germany *   ums:+49180528132130266 *
*
   PGP-Key http://www.virtualitas.net/Ernest_Lergon.asc




Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Haase-Thomas

;) you're right. meanwhile i found out that it seems to have something 
to do with proxies.
forwarding is a term that i borrowed from the JSP concept - which i'm 
currently trying to implement in perl. it means nearly the same as 
redirect, but without telling the client. (as far as i've understood it 
do far. maybe it's just luxury and i'm going to leave it out.)

thank you both for your clues and guesses. i think the best idea will 
lie in informing the programmer that there has been some sort of an 
'event' while processing the page - and leave the uncomfortable decision 
what do to with this 'event' up to him...

... whistling ... :)
M

Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:

 At 07:44 24.04.2002, Martin Haase-Thomas wrote:

 Hi all,

 maybe this is going to be a little off topic, but it won't take you 
 much time:

 I am quite certain that recently I saw a server response code 
 concerning forwarding. It may have looked like 
 HTTP_DOCUMENT_FORWARDED or anything alike. Silly enough I can't 
 recall where I saw it (or whether I even just dreamt it), so my 
 questions are:

 1. Has anyone ever seen that ghost before?
 2. If I'm right, what is the correct memnonic, what's its code - and: 
 where an I find it? perl5.6.1-Apache::Constants::Exports.pm doesn't 
 mention it.

 Hope it wasn't all just a dream...


 Must have been :) Apache::Constants doesn't mention anything about 
 FORWARD, neither does httpd.h. There is DOCUMENT_FOLLOWS, but that's 
 got nothing to do with it.

 What do you mean by forwarding anyway? Like redirect?



-- 
   http://www.meome.de
---
Martin Haase-Thomas |Tel.: +49 30 43730-558
meOme AG|Fax.: +49 30 43730-555
Software Development|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---






Apache2/mod_perl2 an order of magnitude more powerful?

2002-04-24 Thread Nigel Hamilton

Hi,

I haven't installed Apache 2.0 yet but I like the sound of 250
worker threads set as the default!

I would love to run 250 Apache children on my linux server but I
just don't have enough memory (50 children max).

250 http server threads running concurrently would be an order of
magnitude more powerful than my current set up.

Have I got this right? or am I missing a big catch?

NIge

-- 
Nigel Hamilton
Turbo10 Metasearch Engine

email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+44 (0) 207 987 5460
fax:+44 (0) 207 987 5468

http://turbo10.com  Search Deeper. Browse Faster.




Re: Apache2/mod_perl2 an order of magnitude more powerful?

2002-04-24 Thread Ged Haywood

Hi there,

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Nigel Hamilton wrote:

   250 http server threads running concurrently would be an order of
 magnitude more powerful than my current set up.
 
   Have I got this right? or am I missing a big catch?

No and yes in that order.  Your computer won't be any more powerful,
no matter how many threads you run...

73,
Ged.




Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread darren chamberlain

* Martin Haase-Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-24 08:19]:
 forwarding is a term that i borrowed from the JSP concept - which i'm
 currently trying to implement in perl. it means nearly the same as
 redirect, but without telling the client. (as far as i've understood
 it do far. maybe it's just luxury and i'm going to leave it out.)

That sounds exactly like internal_redirect.

(darren)

-- 
Help!  I'm a rock!



Re: Apache2/mod_perl2 an order of magnitude more powerful?

2002-04-24 Thread Nigel Hamilton

  250 http server threads running concurrently would be an order of
  magnitude more powerful than my current set up.
 
  Have I got this right? or am I missing a big catch?

 No and yes in that order.  Your computer won't be any more powerful,
 no matter how many threads you run...


Yes. OK.

But having 250 worker threads instantiated in memory and ready to use the
CPU is surely still better than 50 pre-forked servers?



-- 
Nigel Hamilton
Turbo10 Metasearch Engine

email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+44 (0) 207 987 5460
fax:+44 (0) 207 987 5468

http://turbo10.com  Search Deeper. Browse Faster.




Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Jon Robison

It was my understanding that there are numerous tools for converting
tables like this at the mysql.com site.  Some will even access the
Access tables via ODBC and create a set of tables directly for you, or
just make dumps that can be read into MySQL.

Once made, Webmin does a good job of administering mysql databases.
www.webmin.com

--Jon Robison

Adi Fairbank wrote:
 
 Does anyone know of a good customizable, user-friendly, online database
 application, preferably mod_perl-based?  I want to migrate a small Access
 database to MySQL with a web interface, for added features and room for
 growth.  Has anyone come across a good open source project or toolkit that
 would make this job really easy?
 
 TIA,
 -Adi



Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Perrin Harkins

Martin Haase-Thomas wrote:
 forwarding is a term that i borrowed from the JSP concept - which i'm 
 currently trying to implement in perl.

JSP forward is directly equivalent to an internal redirect.  It's just 
an include that doesn't return.  In short, it's a GOTO statement.  Thank 
you Sun.

- Perrin




ANNOUNCE: AxKit 1.5.2

2002-04-24 Thread Matt Sergeant

AxKit 1.5.2 is out. Minor bug fixes and small feature changes.

  http://axkit.org/

 - Allow AxKit to handle directory requests.
 - Fixed all Language modules to return 200/OK
 - Added AxIgnoreStylePI directive
 - Ported AxPoint to use XML::Handler::AxPoint
 - TaglibHelper taglibs no longer need to have parse_* subs
 - Added HtmlDoc language module
 - Fixed strange bug in cached LibXSLT stylesheets

-- 
!-- Matt --
:-Get a smart net/:-




Re: Apache2/mod_perl2 an order of magnitude more powerful?

2002-04-24 Thread Perrin Harkins

Nigel Hamilton wrote:
   I would love to run 250 Apache children on my linux server but I
 just don't have enough memory (50 children max).

  thread still needs its own perl interpreter.Then you probably won't 
have enough memory with Apache 2 either.  There is some additional 
memory savings from sharing the opcode tree, but each   Expect it to be 
better, but you don't get something (unlimited parallelism) for nothing 
(limited RAM).

- Perrin




Re: [Q maybe OT] forward

2002-04-24 Thread Andrew Ho

Hello,

MHTforwarding is a term that i borrowed from the JSP concept - which i'm 
MHTcurrently trying to implement in perl.

PHJSP forward is directly equivalent to an internal redirect. It's just 
PHan include that doesn't return.  In short, it's a GOTO statement. Thank 
PHyou Sun.

This concept is supported better in Apache::ASP, where you can just pass
arguments directly to the target page. If you use the internal_redirect()
method, you have to use notes(), pnotes(), globals, or some other
cumbersome method to pass arguments.

Humbly,

Andrew

--
Andrew Ho   http://www.tellme.com/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice 650-930-9062
Tellme Networks, Inc.   1-800-555-TELLFax 650-930-9101
--




Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Chuck Goehring

Stas,

That made it work!  Your my hero!.  That also made the script that accesses
Oracle work as well.  We've staved off the IIS beast for another day!

I'm not familiar with the testing stuff except when Doug had me run the
t/report thing..  I'm a CGI guy rather that an apache handler/C language
type.

The 250 was the built-in default value.  I  hadn't set anything related to
threads because I haven't read any of that yet.  Just trying to get things
basically working.  The high memory consumption and sluggish response may
have been aggravated by the missing directive and this machine only has
128MB memory.  It's running on my workstation that has many applications
open all the time.

Thanks for the help.

Chuck

- Original Message -
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chuck Goehring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99


 Chuck Goehring wrote:
  You're right.  I'm getting impatient and jumping ahead.  Pasted directly
  from your post, restarted Apache and get same thing
 
  [Tue Apr 23 12:16:54 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2560
  [Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Child process is running
  [Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Acquired the start
mutex.
  [Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Starting 250 worker
threads.
  [Tue Apr 23 12:17:46 2002] [error] 2560: ModPerl::Registry: `Can't call
  method args on an undefined value at c:/perl/5.6.1/lib/CGI.pm line
433.
 
  It is referring to the IF statement:
 if ($MOD_PERL) {
 $query_string = Apache-request-args;
 } else {
 $query_string = $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'} if defined
$ENV{'QUERY_STRING'};
 $query_string ||= $ENV{'REDIRECT_QUERY_STRING'} if defined
  $ENV{'REDIRECT_QUERY_STRING'};
 }
 I know what was missing.

 add 'PerlOptions +GlobalRequest', like so:

 Location /perl
SetHandler perl-script
PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry
Options ExecCGI
PerlSendHeader On
PerlOptions +GlobalRequest
 /Location


http://perl.apache.org/preview/modperl-docs/dst_html/docs/2.0/user/config/co
nfig.html#PerlOptions_Directive
 # GlobalRequest
 Setup the global request_rec for use with Apache-request

 Sorry for missing this one, I'm not used to it yet :)

 Also I'd like to repeat that the 2.0 test suite is the best place to
 learn how, before the docs will be completed.

 __
 Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
 http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
 http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com




Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen

At 19:31 24.04.2002, Chuck Goehring wrote:
That made it work!  Your my hero!.  That also made the script that accesses
Oracle work as well.  We've staved off the IIS beast for another day!

Great!

I'm not familiar with the testing stuff except when Doug had me run the
t/report thing..  I'm a CGI guy rather that an apache handler/C language
type.

What he meant is that the test scripts in t/ contain many examples of 
mod_perl 2.0 configuration and use. Look at the *.pm files which show 
various handlers being used. That should give you an idea of what to do.


-- 
Per Einar Ellefsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Adi Fairbank

For example, what I'm looking for are other projects similar to Gedafe:

  http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/gedafe/

but maybe with a more customizable front-end.

-Adi




Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Ken Y. Clark

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Adi Fairbank wrote:

 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:27:11 -0700
 From: Adi Fairbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps

 For example, what I'm looking for are other projects similar to Gedafe:

   http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/gedafe/

 but maybe with a more customizable front-end.

 -Adi

Adi,

I've written so many on-line database apps in mod_perl/MySQL/Oracle
that I think I'll go crazy sometimes.  They all have so much in
common, esp. the typical administrative interface where you have to
show all, show one, edit, create, [confirm] delete, etc.
Everytime I find myself following the same basic formula, but they're
all so significantly different that I can't really see reusing much
code.  I guess you could abstract things to such a degree that
lots of directives could be passed to extremely generic methods, but
that actually has always seemed more trouble to me than it's worth.

I guess my bit of insight I'm trying to share is that you should
probably just write your own from scratch.  It sounds like you're
somewhat new to this, anyway, so the experience will do you good.  :)
I guess I just don't think you're going to find anything that will
ever be as flexible and powerful as something you write yourself.
You'd likely spend as much time trying to grok someone else's code so
you could modify it as you'd spend hacking your own.

If you'd like examples of how to go about this, write me off-list and
I'll send you a lot of nasty code.

ky




Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Peter Bi

Since the excellent HTML::Template, the codes becomes more re-usable...

Peter

- Original Message - 
From: Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adi Fairbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps



 
 I've written so many on-line database apps in mod_perl/MySQL/Oracle
 that I think I'll go crazy sometimes.  They all have so much in
 common, esp. the typical administrative interface where you have to
 show all, show one, edit, create, [confirm] delete, etc.
 Everytime I find myself following the same basic formula, but they're
 all so significantly different that I can't really see reusing much
 code.  I guess you could abstract things to such a degree that
 lots of directives could be passed to extremely generic methods, but
 that actually has always seemed more trouble to me than it's worth.
 





Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Wim Kerkhoff

Since the excellent Embperl::Object, the code becomes more re-usable...

Sorry, had to be said. My point is that there are many templating systems to
choose from. With a bit of fore thought, the Show, List, Delete, Add, etc
buttons can be moved into different objects/methods/templates, so that it's
easier to pick and choose your interface components.

Wim

On 24-Apr-2002 Peter Bi wrote:
 Since the excellent HTML::Template, the codes becomes more re-usable...
 
 Peter
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adi Fairbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:23 PM
 Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps
 
 
 
 
 I've written so many on-line database apps in mod_perl/MySQL/Oracle
 that I think I'll go crazy sometimes.  They all have so much in
 common, esp. the typical administrative interface where you have to
 show all, show one, edit, create, [confirm] delete, etc.
 Everytime I find myself following the same basic formula, but they're
 all so significantly different that I can't really see reusing much
 code.  I guess you could abstract things to such a degree that
 lots of directives could be passed to extremely generic methods, but
 that actually has always seemed more trouble to me than it's worth.



Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Peter Bi

Well, I changed it back to HTML::Template . It takes relatively less time
to work it out with graphic designers.

Peter


- Original Message -
From: Wim Kerkhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps


 Since the excellent HTML::Template, the code becomes more re-usable...

 Sorry, had to be said. My point is that there are many templating systems
to
 choose from. With a bit of fore thought, the Show, List, Delete, Add, etc
 buttons can be moved into different objects/methods/templates, so that
it's
 easier to pick and choose your interface components.

 Wim

 On 24-Apr-2002 Peter Bi wrote:
  Since the excellent HTML::Template, the codes becomes more re-usable...
 
  Peter
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adi Fairbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:23 PM
  Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps
 
 
 
  
  I've written so many on-line database apps in mod_perl/MySQL/Oracle
  that I think I'll go crazy sometimes.  They all have so much in
  common, esp. the typical administrative interface where you have to
  show all, show one, edit, create, [confirm] delete, etc.
  Everytime I find myself following the same basic formula, but they're
  all so significantly different that I can't really see reusing much
  code.  I guess you could abstract things to such a degree that
  lots of directives could be passed to extremely generic methods, but
  that actually has always seemed more trouble to me than it's worth.





RE: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Joe Breeden

Arghhh! Enough! Enough! Enough!. The question of which Template/App/Embed 
technique is best has been discussed to death. Please don't start a new round of 'beat 
the dead horse'. 

Links to a list of Application Servers/Toolkits/Embedded Perl see the url:

http://perl.apache.org/#appservers

or see the website for the mod_perl Cookbook which can be found at:

http://www.modperlcookbook.org/

Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Bi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:06 PM
 To: Wim Kerkhoff
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Y. Clark
 Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps
 
 
 Well, I changed it back to HTML::Template . It takes 
 relatively less time
 to work it out with graphic designers.
 
 Peter
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Wim Kerkhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:50 PM
 Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps
 
 
  Since the excellent HTML::Template, the code becomes more 
 re-usable...
 
  Sorry, had to be said. My point is that there are many 
 templating systems
 to
  choose from. With a bit of fore thought, the Show, List, 
 Delete, Add, etc
  buttons can be moved into different 
 objects/methods/templates, so that
 it's
  easier to pick and choose your interface components.
 
  Wim
 
  On 24-Apr-2002 Peter Bi wrote:
   Since the excellent HTML::Template, the codes becomes 
 more re-usable...
  
   Peter
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Ken Y. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Adi Fairbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:23 PM
   Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps
  
  
  
   
   I've written so many on-line database apps in 
 mod_perl/MySQL/Oracle
   that I think I'll go crazy sometimes.  They all have so much in
   common, esp. the typical administrative interface where 
 you have to
   show all, show one, edit, create, [confirm] 
 delete, etc.
   Everytime I find myself following the same basic 
 formula, but they're
   all so significantly different that I can't really see 
 reusing much
   code.  I guess you could abstract things to such a degree that
   lots of directives could be passed to extremely generic 
 methods, but
   that actually has always seemed more trouble to me than 
 it's worth.
 
 
 



Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Perrin Harkins

Peter Bi wrote:
 Well, I changed it back to HTML::Template.

No template flame wars, please.  HTML::Template is not unique (it has 
much in common with Template Toolkit and dozens of other less famous 
modules from CPAN), and Embperl::Object is really pretty cool.  Your 
original point about separating presentation out into templates helping 
with code reusability is a good one, so let's just leave it at that.

- Perrin




[OT] Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa

At Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:05:38 -0700,
Peter Bi wrote:
 
 Well, I changed it back to HTML::Template . It takes relatively less time
 to work it out with graphic designers.

plug
I've made simple utilities (fot TT and H::T) to help perl
developers having a nightmare with co-work with designers.

See http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=161595 for details.
/plug

-- 
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: full-featured online database apps

2002-04-24 Thread Peter Bi

(agreed. let's stop talking on specific templates.)

As to the reusability, form actions can actually be put in an abstract
class, so a particular application can subclass it by implement of action
methods with an optional xml control. But I have the same feeling as in Ken
Clark's original post, one could not go too far beyond that, or not worth of
doing that. Using an existing tool may solve one problem but it usually
takes as much time to add or modify something later. On the other hand, the
typical size of web projects nowadays is still well within our ability of
write-from-scratch.

Peter

- Original Message -
From: Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Wim Kerkhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Y.
Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: full-featured online database apps


 Peter Bi wrote:
  Well, I changed it back to HTML::Template.

 No template flame wars, please.  HTML::Template is not unique (it has
 much in common with Template Toolkit and dozens of other less famous
 modules from CPAN), and Embperl::Object is really pretty cool.  Your
 original point about separating presentation out into templates helping
 with code reusability is a good one, so let's just leave it at that.

 - Perrin






[SOLVED] Re: Redhat 7.2 glibc update causes problems with Apache::Cookie?

2002-04-24 Thread Edward Moon

FYI,

I finally got my problems with Apache::Cookie (part of libapreq) solved. 

Much thanks to Stas for advice on solving this problem.

Here's what I found:

1) Installing the glibc 2.2.4-24 updates borked the RPM installed perl 
5.6.1. Building 5.6.1 from source fixed this problem.

2) libapreq 1.0 installs the libapreq.* files into /usr/local/lib. I ended 
up adding the path to ld.conf. Not sure if this was necessary.