Re: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 )
- Original Message - From: Gerald Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rolf Ohnmacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 12:43 PM Subject: Re: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 ) > > > > Same old message: > > > > Can't load > > 'C:/perl561/site/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/auto/HTML/Embperl/Embperl.dll' > for > > module HTML::Embperl: load_file:Eine DLL-Initialisierungsroutine ist > > fehlgeschlagen at C:/perl561/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/DynaLoader.pm line > 72. > > at embp.pl line 1 > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at embp.pl line 1. > > > > I have no idea what could be wrong else! So I inspected Dynaloader.pm at > > line 72 but no chance ... > > > > Are you sure you are having the correct ApacheCore.dll in your PATH on > Win95? > > Gerald Yes, I'm sure! I copied the whole Apache ( and Perl ) tree from NT to Win95 and verified that there is no other ApacheCore.dll left on the file system that could be erranously taken. Apache and Perl are now exactly identical on both systems. Could it be that there are other libraries in the path killing the chain? In other words: what's the minimal allocation of libs I have to use after booting to make sure that it lies not on my Win95 configuration? If I can exclude side effects by others there could be a light on horizon ... Rolf
Re: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 )
> I copied both Apache and Perl from NT to Win95 after I recompiled mod_perl > with > the PERL_STARTUP_DONE_CHECK flag and it worked! PerlModule/PerlRequire > and use let Apache start - fine ! It works on NT and Win95. > > I was so happy about it that I thought the other problem is solved too - but > it was not! > On NT batch EmbPerl is running - but not on Win95! > > Same old message: > > Can't load > 'C:/perl561/site/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/auto/HTML/Embperl/Embperl.dll' for > module HTML::Embperl: load_file:Eine DLL-Initialisierungsroutine ist > fehlgeschlagen at C:/perl561/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/DynaLoader.pm line 72. > at embp.pl line 1 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at embp.pl line 1. > > I have no idea what could be wrong else! So I inspected Dynaloader.pm at > line 72 but no chance ... > Are you sure you are having the correct ApacheCore.dll in your PATH on Win95? Gerald
Re: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 )
- Original Message - From: Gerald Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rolf Ohnmacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 5:20 AM Subject: RE: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 ) > > Is it possible to copy the whole "Apache"-tree generated on NT onto my > > Win95- > > machine expecting to work ( Apache+Perl path names are identical ) ? > > > Yes, that's what I do all the time. Compile on NT run on NT/95/98. You could > even change the drive letter (but you must install in the same path) > > Gerald I copied both Apache and Perl from NT to Win95 after I recompiled mod_perl with the PERL_STARTUP_DONE_CHECK flag and it worked! PerlModule/PerlRequire and use let Apache start - fine ! It works on NT and Win95. I was so happy about it that I thought the other problem is solved too - but it was not! On NT batch EmbPerl is running - but not on Win95! Same old message: Can't load 'C:/perl561/site/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/auto/HTML/Embperl/Embperl.dll' for module HTML::Embperl: load_file:Eine DLL-Initialisierungsroutine ist fehlgeschlagen at C:/perl561/5.00561/lib/MSWin32-x86/DynaLoader.pm line 72. at embp.pl line 1 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at embp.pl line 1. I have no idea what could be wrong else! So I inspected Dynaloader.pm at line 72 but no chance ... Best Regards , Rolf
RE: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 )
> Same procedure on Win95 did not success (but > this > is not really relevant ...) - I was warned not to compile > Perl+Apache+... on > Win95! > You need another shell to compile on Win95 (I think 4Dos shell works, but I never tried) > Is it possible to copy the whole "Apache"-tree generated on NT onto my > Win95- > machine expecting to work ( Apache+Perl path names are identical ) ? > > Yes, that's what I do all the time. Compile on NT run on NT/95/98. You could even change the drive letter (but you must install in the same path) Gerald - Gerald Richterecos electronic communication services gmbh Internetconnect * Webserver/-design/-datenbanken * Consulting Post: Tulpenstrasse 5 D-55276 Dienheim b. Mainz E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice:+49 6133 925151 WWW:http://www.ecos.de Fax: +49 6133 925152 -
Re: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed ( just Win95 )
- Original Message - From: Gerald Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rolf Ohnmacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 5:41 AM Subject: RE: EmbPerl use HTML::Embperl failed > > > > "nmake test" did (and does) not work correct !!! > > First nmake test must run correct, then I guess we have the reason, why > offline mode doesn't work > > Embperl is linked against the > c:\apache\apache_1.3.9\src\CoreR\ApacheCore.dll and I guess the > ApacheCore.dll in c:\apache and c:\apache\apache_1.3.9\src\CoreR are not the > same. Is this possible? As you see from the path nmake test adds the > location where it "thinks" ApacheCore.dll could be found to the end of the > path, but because c:\apche is in your path, this one will be found first. > Right !!! The ApacheCore.dll in c:\apache was different ( I don't know why - possibly from the previous installed binary distribution). I deleted c:\Apache from path and it worked - on NT. Same procedure on Win95 did not success (but this is not really relevant ...) - I was warned not to compile Perl+Apache+... on Win95! Is it possible to copy the whole "Apache"-tree generated on NT onto my Win95- machine expecting to work ( Apache+Perl path names are identical ) ?
