Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Right. Except there is no 2.2.5; 2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this version can get it at ApacheLounge. Of course 2.2.4 essentially worked, while 2.2.7 will give the modperl'ers on Windows something they have BEGGED for forever, the chance to see parsing errors at startup from their httpd.conf file(!!!) Yes! It's been egging me for the longest blistering time!
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Foo JH wrote: > >> Right. Except there is no 2.2.5; > 2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this > version can get it at ApacheLounge. They can get it from SVN too, that doesn't mean it's an ASF version. The ASF specifically rejected it, which makes it's persistence a pretty sorry state of affairs for the hoster :) Bill
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache under windows and I think this thread might help me. I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge, but they still don't work. I read that Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge should work with mod_perl. Isn't this true? They all install correctly, and I can even start the server with the default httpd.conf. It gave an error just a single time with the default httpd.conf. If I install mod_perl, the percentage of the times when Apache doesn't want to start and give errors is much bigger, but still most of the times it starts and works. If I install Catalyst and use a certain Catalyst app (that doesn't have errors), Apache can start very rarely. When I try to start the server, it appears an error message "Visual Studio just in time debugger" that doesn't give any helpful information. Most of the times in the error log is not printed absolutely anything, and sometimes it prints that the main thread couldn't start the child thread and that the thread was closed, or sometimes it prints that the main thread received a kill signal and that it closes. I had VS6 and VS.net 2005 installed, but I've uninstalled them both. I have no program that starts with "Microsoft" in the Add-Remove programs list, but that Visual Studio just in time debugger appears. Do you have any idea what could have happened? I think it should be a problem of Apache for Windows, or a Windows issue, or a hardware issue, but I don't know how to test it. Thank you for any idea. Octavian - Original Message - From: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:13 AM Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment Right. Except there is no 2.2.5; 2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this version can get it at ApacheLounge. Of course 2.2.4 essentially worked, while 2.2.7 will give the modperl'ers on Windows something they have BEGGED for forever, the chance to see parsing errors at startup from their httpd.conf file(!!!) Yes! It's been egging me for the longest blistering time!
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote: > > I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from > apachelounge, but they still don't work. Simply put; Apache 2.2.4 did work. The one-off build at AL of 2.2.6 isn't 2.2.6; 2.2.5 represents an aborted attempted at a release, none of the above represents what will be in 2.2.7 for you to move forward. In light of this; You are best off, needing this today, to see the earlier posts on this list of which combinations of binaries for 2.2.4 were known to work. Bill
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote: Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache under windows and I think this thread might help me. I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge, but they still don't work. I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and it's running good for me. Much much better than the 2.x.x series from the Apache site. Works on XP and W2k3. A point to note though is that you should not use the modperl compilation from AL. Use the standard-issue one from theoryx5. Install libapreq2 from theoryx5 also. Apache 2.2.6 is not recommended for Win32 iirc. Don't touch it. Of course, your problems may be compounded (but I'm not sure) by the other components you are using (Catalyst)? For me, I'm just living off HTML::Template, DBI, and some other libraries. You may want to be more explicit on the errors you're encountering, and at which points did the install break.
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Foo JH wrote: > Octavian Rasnita wrote: >> Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache >> under >> windows and I think this thread might help me. >> >> I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from >> apachelounge, but they still don't work. > I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and it's running good for me. Much much > better than the 2.x.x series from the Apache site. Works on XP and W2k3. > > A point to note though is that you should not use the modperl > compilation from AL. Use the standard-issue one from theoryx5. Install > libapreq2 from theoryx5 also. EXACTLY. Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy. Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy. Mix and match at your own risk.
Header info
Hey,
I've written a basic authentication,authorization handler based on ldap
groups. Now the problem is that I need the found ldap groups in my PHP
applications. I've try'd adding the groups to the header but it failed. Here
is what goes wrong.
I Created the following .htaccess
AuthName "Besite LDAP Authentication"
AuthType Basic
require valid-user
PerlSetVar application ilsa
PerlAuthenHandler Apache::Ldap::ldap_auth
PerlAuthzHandler Apache::Ldap::ldap_authz
SetHandler modperl
PerlResponseHandler Apache::Ldap::ldap_response
I try'd to sent some basic message using headers in the responseHandler. But
I constantly see a blank page. Here is my responseHandler.
package Apache::Ldap::ldap_response;
use strict;
use warnings;
use Apache2::URI();
use Apache2::Access;
use Apache2::RequestRec();
use Apache2::RequestUtil;
use Apache2::Log;
use Apache2::RequestIO;
use Apache2::Const -compile => qw(OK);
sub handler
{
my $r = shift;
$r->log_error("Begin Response Handler");
$r->content_type('text/html');
$r->headers_out->set(usergroup => "ADMIN");
$r->rflush;
$r->log_error("Headers sent");
return Apache2::Const::OK;
}
1;
But the only things I see is a blank page. and not my PHP page with the
header info. but when I don't use the handler I can see the page with the
header info but without the extra usergoup field. Can somebody help? Is
there another way to get this info in my PHP application?
Thanks,
Ward
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Header-info-tf4561339.html#a13017407
Sent from the mod_perl - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Foo JH wrote: Octavian Rasnita wrote: Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache under windows and I think this thread might help me. I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge, but they still don't work. I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and it's running good for me. Much much better than the 2.x.x series from the Apache site. Works on XP and W2k3. A point to note though is that you should not use the modperl compilation from AL. Use the standard-issue one from theoryx5. Install libapreq2 from theoryx5 also. EXACTLY. Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy. Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy. Mix and match at your own risk. Actually, I use VC6 to build all the ppm packages in our theoryx5 repository, including mod_perl and libapreq2, so as to be compatible with ActivePerl (also built with VC6). But your point of mixing and matching at your own risk is well-taken - the fact that the VC6 mod_perl package appears to work with the AL build of Apache built with VC8 may just mean that the testing done hasn't yet encountered the problems that could in principle be there; see, for example, http://search.cpan.org/src/SHAY/Win32-SharedFileOpen-3.36/INSTALL for an instance that is known to illustrate the problem. I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled with VC6) may be another example of the dangers of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8. -- best regards, Randy
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Here it is what it happened: I've installed: Apache/2.2.4 (Win32), Server built: Jan 9 2007 23:17:20 perl, v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread built 822 latest mod_perl from TheoryX After installing them, I started the web server and it worked fine and I could access the success page. I have tried stopping and starting it for more times with success. Then I've created a default Catalyst app named "Testing", using: catalyst Testing I was able to access the "Testing" application using its internal web server, so it is working. Then I've created a virtual host for calling that Catalyst application. Here is the content of that virtualhost: ServerName www.brk.ro ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot e:/web/Testare/root ErrorLog e:/web/Testare/logs/error.txt CustomLog e:/web/Testare/logs/access.txt common PerlRequire "e:/web/Testare/script/preload.pl" Options Indexes Order allow,deny Allow from all SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler Testare Of course, I created the directory "logs" under the "Testing" app directory, and I also created the program preload.pl that just "use" the "Testing" module. And I tried starting the server, but it appeared an error window "Visual Studio just in time debugger" and it also printed the following errors in the command prompt: net start apache2 The Apache2 service is starting. The Apache2 service could not be started. A system error has occurred. System error 1067 has occurred. The process terminated unexpectedly. In the error log it appeared the following errors: ... [Wed Oct 03 20:19:38 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Starting 250 worker threads. [Wed Oct 03 20:19:38 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Starting thread to listen on port 80. [Wed Oct 03 20:19:59 2007] [notice] Parent: Received shutdown signal -- Shutting down the server. [Wed Oct 03 20:19:59 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Exit event signaled. Child process is ending. [Wed Oct 03 20:20:00 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Released the start mutex [Wed Oct 03 20:20:01 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Waiting for 250 worker threads to exit. [Wed Oct 03 20:20:01 2007] [notice] Child 3008: All worker threads have exited. [Wed Oct 03 20:20:01 2007] [notice] Child 3008: Child process is exiting In order to be sure, I've repeated and I tried starting again the server for a few times. 2 times, the web server started with that Catalyst app, and I was able to use it. The rest of the times it shown those errors. I didn't change absolutely anything between those trials, but I just tried stopping and restarting the server. However it is strange that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. Thank you. Octavian - Original Message - From: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:26 PM Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Foo JH wrote: Octavian Rasnita wrote: Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache under windows and I think this thread might help me. I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge, but they still don't work. I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and it's running good for me. Much much better than the 2.x.x series from the Apache site. Works on XP and W2k3. A point to note though is that you should not use the modperl compilation from AL. Use the standard-issue one from theoryx5. Install libapreq2 from theoryx5 also. EXACTLY. Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy. Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy. Mix and match at your own risk. Actually, I use VC6 to build all the ppm packages in our theoryx5 repository, including mod_perl and libapreq2, so as to be compatible with ActivePerl (also built with VC6). But your point of mixing and matching at your own risk is well-taken - the fact that the VC6 mod_perl package appears to work with the AL build of Apache built with VC8 may just mean that the testing done hasn't yet encountered the problems that could in principle be there; see, for example, http://search.cpan.org/src/SHAY/Win32-SharedFileOpen-3.36/INSTALL for an instance that is known to illustrate the problem. I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled with VC6) may be another example of the dangers of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8. -- best regards, Randy
Re: mod_perl success stories on ZDNet
If I have my own success story how would I go about adding it to the list? -bop On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: On 10/1/07, Carl Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it me, or does that just link through to here: http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2002/05/ perl_success_story_termiumplus.html which doesn't require registration? Yes. Like I said, it's just content brought over from O'Reilly. It's not a new story. We already have it on our success stories page. - Perrin
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote: > > And I tried starting the server, but it appeared an error window "Visual > Studio just in time debugger" and it also printed the following errors > in the command prompt: That's a crash. Studio will give you all the info but it's harder to navigate, for some information on obtaining the dr watson backtrace see http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html Note you probably want to unpack http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-no_ssl-symbols.zip (or http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d-symbols.zip if you had installed the ssl version) directly into your apache 2.2 tree. I don't know of availability of the ActiveState symbols, nor TheoryX's, but if they exist it will make reading that backtrace sooo much clearer. Bill
$|=1 not responding
Hi, I've been looking around all over for an answer, no luck yet. Maybe people from this list can help me. I upgraded my server from an old distro(apache 1.3+mod_perl 1.x) to a centos5(apache 2.2 + mod_perl 2.x). It seems that $|=1; is not doing what it should do. The code : #!/usr/bin/perl print "Content-Type: text/html\n\n"; print "---($¦)"; local $¦=1; print "---($¦)"; print "12..."; sleep 5; print "34..."; print "---($¦)"; The output : ---(0)---(1)12...34...---(1) I should be getting : ---(0)---(1)12...34...---(1) Server : - CentOS release 5 (Final) - mod_perl-2.0.2-6.3.el5 - httpd-2.2.3-7.el5.centos Conf: SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::RegistryPrefork Options +ExecCGI PerlOptions +ParseHeaders Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI Any hints ? Thanx in advance. FreiZz
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Ok, but the strange thing is that the error appears even though I've uninstalled both VS6 and VS.net 2005. A few days ago I had VS6 and VS.net installed, and that error provided some debug information (that I couldn't understand). So I went in VS.net and I set it to not show the debug info because I thought that that window might not appear anymore. After that moment, the "Just in time debugger" error window use to appear but with a different message, telling that: """ Visual Studio Just-In-Time Debugger An unhandled win32 exception occurred in httpd.exe [2996]. Just-In-Time debugging this exception failed with the following error: No installed debugger has Just-In-Time debugging enabled. In Visual Studio, Just-In-Time debugging can be enabled from Tools/Options/Debugging/Just-In-Time. Check the documentation index for 'Just-in-time debugging, errors' for more information. OK """ Well, I've uninstalled VS6 and VS.net, but this message still appears, so I have no where to go in Tools/Options/... Octavian - Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:20 PM Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment Octavian Rasnita wrote: And I tried starting the server, but it appeared an error window "Visual Studio just in time debugger" and it also printed the following errors in the command prompt: That's a crash. Studio will give you all the info but it's harder to navigate, for some information on obtaining the dr watson backtrace see http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html Note you probably want to unpack http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-no_ssl-symbols.zip (or http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d-symbols.zip if you had installed the ssl version) directly into your apache 2.2 tree. I don't know of availability of the ActiveState symbols, nor TheoryX's, but if they exist it will make reading that backtrace sooo much clearer. Bill
RE: $|=1 not responding
Is this any help? http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache2/RequestIO.html#C_rflush_ I'm not sure off hand if $r->print() and print behave differently with regards to flushing. There's a thread in the archive talking about this stuff. (http://marc.info/?t=11255795481&r=1&w=2) but it doesn't seem to offer any resolution. It does note that if you're running output filters they could potentially break flushing. Adam -Original Message- From: FreiZz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 2:49 PM To: modperl@perl.apache.org Cc: FreiZz Subject: $|=1 not responding Hi, I've been looking around all over for an answer, no luck yet. Maybe people from this list can help me. I upgraded my server from an old distro(apache 1.3+mod_perl 1.x) to a centos5(apache 2.2 + mod_perl 2.x). It seems that $|=1; is not doing what it should do. The code : #!/usr/bin/perl print "Content-Type: text/html\n\n"; print "---($|)"; local $|=1; print "---($|)"; print "12..."; sleep 5; print "34..."; print "---($|)"; The output : ---(0)---(1)12...34...---(1) I should be getting : ---(0)---(1)12...34...---(1) Server : - CentOS release 5 (Final) - mod_perl-2.0.2-6.3.el5 - httpd-2.2.3-7.el5.centos Conf: SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::RegistryPrefork Options +ExecCGI PerlOptions +ParseHeaders Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI Any hints ? Thanx in advance. FreiZz
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Octavian Rasnita wrote: > > Well, I've uninstalled VS6 and VS.net, but this message still appears, > so I have no where to go in Tools/Options/... You didn't bother to finish reading; >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html Which tells you how to enable/override drwtsn32 as your default error handler (-i flag I think, offhand).
Apache 2.2.6 and mod_perl 2.0.3
Hi, I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting Apache gives this error: httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module could not be found. This worked fine under 2.2.4, so the configuration is not the problem. The mod_perl.so was retrived using ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/mod_perl-2.0.ppd. Any one able to get mod_perl.so to work with Apache 2.2.6 Thanks, Tracy
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy. Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy. Is there a VC6 build of modperl + libapreq2? I've been following the links on the ASF site, so it's always been theoryx5. To date I've been using ActivePerl all the way, so it's still a combo of VC6 Perl + VC8 modperl. But so far so good... Mix and match at your own risk.
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled with VC6) may be another example of the dangers of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8. Point taken.
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalyst, so I can't pinpoint the problem. But if your tests are good with a clean install of Apache2 + mp2, you may want to check compiler used to build Catalyst (see Randy's email on the VC used for ActivePerl, Apache, and modperl). I suppose Catalyst is not a pure-perl implementation?
Re: Apache 2.2.6 and mod_perl 2.0.3
You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2.2.4 from ASF or 2.2.5 from ApacheLounge. Tracy E Schreiber wrote: Hi, I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting Apache gives this error: httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module could not be found. This worked fine under 2.2.4, so the configuration is not the problem. The mod_perl.so was retrived using ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/mod_perl-2.0.ppd. Any one able to get mod_perl.so to work with Apache 2.2.6 Thanks, Tracy
Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment
Catalyst uses very many CPAN modules, and I am sure that not all of them are pure perl. I've compiled Catalyst using VS6, so if ActivePerl is compiled with the same compiler, and Apache and mod_perl the same, I don't think it should be a problem. I have also tried using an older ppm binary of Catalyst but with the same results. But I think I might have a problem with the hardware, because sometimes right after booting the system the computer doesn't start, but just keeps restarting and nothing appears on the display, and I need to power it off, wait a little then power it up again in order to make it boot. That problem might be the same that causes Apache not work and I think the issue might be the motherboard. So I will try to change it, because it is under the warranty, and I hope after that Apache will also work. Octavian - Original Message - From: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 8:34 AM Subject: Re: Best version of Apache for Win32 deployment Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalyst, so I can't pinpoint the problem. But if your tests are good with a clean install of Apache2 + mp2, you may want to check compiler used to build Catalyst (see Randy's email on the VC used for ActivePerl, Apache, and modperl). I suppose Catalyst is not a pure-perl implementation?
Re: Apache 2.2.6 and mod_perl 2.0.3
Hello, Does apache2.2+mp2 have much advantage than apache2.0+mp2? 2007/10/4, Foo JH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2.2.4 from ASF or 2.2.5 > from ApacheLounge. > > Tracy E Schreiber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting > > Apache gives this error: > > > > httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load > > D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module could not be > > found. > > > > This worked fine under 2.2.4, so the configuration is not the problem. The > > mod_perl.so was retrived using ppm install > > http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/mod_perl-2.0.ppd. > > > > Any one able to get mod_perl.so to work with Apache 2.2.6 > > > > Thanks, > > Tracy > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Apache 2.2.6 and mod_perl 2.0.3
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Tracy E Schreiber wrote: Hi, I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting Apache gives this error: httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module could not be found. This worked fine under 2.2.4, so the configuration is not the problem. The mod_perl.so was retrived using ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/mod_perl-2.0.ppd. Any one able to get mod_perl.so to work with Apache 2.2.6 Thanks, Tracy For Apache/2.2.x, you want the mod_perl ppm package, not mod_perl-2.0; see http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html#PPM_Packages for details. Having said that, I'd also suggest holding off using 2.2.6, as others have suggested - stick with 2.2.4 for the time being. Note that the 2.2.5 package from ApacheLounge is not an official ASF release, and the 2.2.6 from the same location contains hacks that won't be in the next official ASF release that addresses certain Win32 problems. See http://marc.info/?t=11913767701&r=1&w=2 for a discussion of this and related issues. -- best regards, Randy Kobes
