[MOSAIC] phonics program

2012-02-17 Thread Carrie Cahill
I am going to make a bold move here and say that Ellin Keene does not believe 
in scripted programs for phonics or any other aspect of reading!!  I seem 
to be in the minority at this point, but I am so disheartened by the 
conversation on this listserv.  The word Mosaic really should be taken out of 
the title of the listserv.  We used to talk about how teachers were putting 
together their own lessons for comprehension.  Now, we're talking about 
scripted phonics programs?   Thank you Renee for bringing back the 
researcher/practitioner - Ellin Keene - into this conversation!
Carrie
K-8 - Illinois




I cannot help but wonder what Ellin Keene thinks of a scripted phonics program.

Renee


On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Lapenas, Nicole wrote:

 Our district uses Saxon Phonics K-2 and the teachers really like it.
 It is scripted and very easy to follow.  Our students for the most
 part do very well with phonics.


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive



[MOSAIC] (no subject)

2010-02-08 Thread Carrie Cahill
In response to the post below - and to everyone around the country - I
ask..THEN WHY USE IT (AIMSWEB)? We have enough to do in the
classroom without adding an extra layer of testing that does nothing to
inform instruction and it doesn't even do what it professes to do -
which is to i.d. kids for RtI!!!  I can't believe this assessment
has gotten so popular and teachers have not risen up in rebellion.
Carrie
K-8, IL


We've been using AIMSWeb for 3 years now for at least K-5 (I think maybe
higher also).  The fluency CBMs are just like DIBELS.  Aimsweb also has
a comprehension maze test and a couple of math tests.  It gives a lot of
reports as to how a student is doing based on class, school, etc...
It's an okay start as to identifying students for RTI services.  I don't
think you should use it solely to place students into RTI intervention
groups. 



___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] (no subject)

2009-08-31 Thread Carrie Cahill
Regarding the easy and fast use of DIBELs and AIMSweb on a recent
post.

AMEN!  Now if only administrators realized it.


I AM an administrator.  Unfortunately many of us in
education...teachers, administrators, etc. want something that's
easy and fast.  That's how we got in to this AIMSweb mess.

Carrie (Asst. Supt.)
K-8, IL
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] (no subject)

2009-08-28 Thread Carrie Cahill
Jan said.
The only elementary school in my district is going to start Response to
Intervention this fall with reading.
The committee who has been investigating RtI has come to the conclusion
the DIEBELS is the only universal screener to use.  They want something
very fast and not too hard to use.
Do any of you use another universal screener?
Thanks!

Jan - there are plenty of other screeners that are WAY better than
DIBELs.  Plus we should not be picking assessments based on their ease
and speed of use!
Carrie
Illinois, K-8

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] Getting back on track

2009-08-01 Thread Carrie Cahill
I second this (message copied below)!!!
Carrie



Moats and Shaywitz are to sane and appropriate reading instruction as
the fear mongers are to Obama's health plan.   A list about reading
comprehension such as Mosaic should be questioning the research of
Moats and Shaywitz (I'm not as familiar with Torgeson) not supporting
it.

I'd like to hear how people on this list are going to start their
strategy instruction for the year.
Elisa


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] weekly strategy study

2009-06-08 Thread Carrie Cahill
I'd like to see this look more like sharing of lessons rather than stuff
that goes with the lessons.  Can we talk about how we learn and
ultimately teach each strategy and not focus on the tools for teaching
them?  Otherwise my fear is that we will only scratch the surface which
is exactly the opposite of what we want to do with our teaching.
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] weekly strategy study

2009-06-08 Thread Carrie Cahill
What do you mean when you say stuff that goes with the lessons?

I mean - not too many graphic organizers, three column note forms, note
taking guides, etc.  I realize they are important but it can get to a
point where they take over and the real teaching and learning gets lost.
I guess it makes me think of make and take workshops and I just hate
those because they are not really about teaching - they are about stuff!

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] RtI

2009-03-27 Thread Carrie Cahill
Carol said:
I am on a school-wide committee working to create a district document
outlining RTI. My group has the large task of compiling resources for
literacy interventions and literacy progress monitoring
assessments...HELP!! Can anyone recommend resources, web-sites,
professional books, etc? Also have you developed a way to get these
resources into the hands of classroom teachers and support staff? Any
and all help is appreciated.
Carol Spinello
Literacy Specialist

I would recommend the Comprehension Toolkit and Making Meaning as great
resources for reading comprehension.  Making Meaning is more structured
and scripted than the toolkit and maybe more than some would like - but
they are both great when used as RESOURCES.
Carrie
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] Professional Readings

2009-03-24 Thread Carrie Cahill
From Leslie:
Does The Workshop Book focus on reading and/or writing?  We are just
finishing Mentor Texts in our study group.  We did Notebook Know-How
earlier this year and we all really got some good info from it.  We are
contemplating The Next Step in Guided Reading, but I'd like to hear what
you  have to say about TWB.

YES!!  It does focus on writing - and reading.  The book has an
interesting format - one that is different from others.  The first
chapter starts out with a working definition of the workshop model.
Each chapter after that is devoted to one teacher/classroom/lesson per
chapter.  The grade levels run from 1st through 8th.  It's not as much
of a how to book, although it does show you specifics of what that
particular teacher in that particular chapter did during their literacy
block.  If you look it up on Amazon you can actually see some excerpts
from the book - I think what I'm saying here will become clearer.  It's
different - but very worthwhile!

Carrie
 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] FW: professional readings

2009-03-23 Thread Carrie Cahill


_
From: Carrie Cahill 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:41 AM
To: 'mosaic-ow...@literacyworkshop.org'
Subject: professional readings

We have 25 teachers in a book study right now reading a book called,
That Workshop Book by Sam Bennett - foreword written by Cris Tovani.
The teachers in my group range from 2nd to 8th grade - the book hits all
grade levels and it's very good!  
Carrie, IL
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] Guided Reading Plus

2009-03-09 Thread Carrie Cahill
I was wondering if there was anyone holding Guided Reading Plus groups
out there?  It's through Linda Dorn's model for RtI:  the Comprehensive
Intervention Model (CIM).  
Thanks!
Carrie
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



Re: [MOSAIC] scripts and thinking

2009-02-24 Thread Carrie Cahill
There is ABSOLUTELY a difference between the script that Lori talks
about below and the scripts in DI programs!  Lori - you are SO right!!
Your example makes me think of a mind script - most, if not all of us,
need to see something in action before we can replicate it ourselves.
That's what I think Lori is talking about here.  That's not a script -
that's an example, a model.  That's what we are expected to do for our
students and that's what we need for ourselves.  After this thorough two
week long modeling session that Lori does for her teachers they are then
able to go off and try it themselves - they follow the model NOT the
script - and she comes back to check with them - using the Gradual
Release of Responsibility with teachers!  They make it their own and
because they're not following a script they don't miss what their kids
do!!!  They are more aware and present in the moment with their
students.  I love what you've written here and I will keep it in a safe
place :-)
Carrie 





-Original Message-
From: Ljackson [mailto:ljack...@gwtc.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:08 AM
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] scripts and thinking

I think what Debbie may be saying is that a script may somehow
apprentice a teacher to better practice and techniques.  I see some
worth in this belief.  Getting non-traditionally certified folks started
with guided reading, I typically model for one week--sharing very, very
detailed lesson plans which could be called scripts, I suppose.  Then we
write a set of these kinds of plans together--sometimes for a few weeks,
amidst much talk of the children, their needs and the educational
possibilities for the books in front of us.  I do see this as
apprenticeship--a means of getting started. The difference is, I go
away. Granted I come back from time to time, but my goal is to refine
practice rather than to define practice, working within the guidelines
established by our district for balanced literacy instruction.  The
little books we use offer us many possibilities for focus in
instruction, according to student need.  The same story could be used
instructionally to teacher text previewing, fluency, sentence structure
and could indicate many possibilities for contextualized word study.
Until these scripted programs come with a 'choose your own ending'
option, I am just not sure it is fair to say that they will ensure the
best literacy education possible for every student.  The person most
responsible for that has to be the classroom teacher.

Lori Jackson


- Original message -
From: Waingort Jimenez, Elisa elwaingor...@cbe.ab.ca
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group
mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009  6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] scripts and thinking

 Debbie,
 And, whose idea is this learning to teach the right way that these
DI scripts spouse?  There is no right way to teach.  There are
philosophies which then guide our teaching practices.  The teaching
practices in DI programs are clearly scripted so that there is minimal
out of the box thinking and everyone is on the same step at the same
time (philosophy).   There is no regard for different size thinking,
rather there is disregard for the messy life of the classroom.
 Elisa
 
 Elisa Waingort
 Grade 2 Spanish Bilingual
 Dalhousie Elementary
 Calgary, Canada
 
 The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even
touched. They must be felt within the heart. 
 -Helen Keller
 
 Visit my blog, A Teacher's Ruminations, and post a message.
 http://waingortgrade2spanishbilingual.blogspot.com/
 
 
 Scripts make sure we learn to teach the right way so that we can
then incorporate those techniques and make them our own. 
 
 
 
 ___
 Mosaic mailing list
 Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
 To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
 
 Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
 
 
 




___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] direct instruction

2009-02-19 Thread Carrie Cahill
In response to Amy's post regarding the pluses of direct instruction I
respectfully ask  - how do you respond to those who expect fidelity of
implementation when you say it's ok for teachers to veer from the
script?  That, to me, is the biggest problem with direct instruction and
teacher scripts - that teachers are NOT allowed to use their expertise
and that they have to follow the script no matter what.
Carrie
K-8, Illinois
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] essay writing

2009-02-02 Thread Carrie Cahill
Has anyone read the book, Less is More?  There is a whole chapter on
essay writing.  Kimberly Hill Campbell (the author) cites lists of books
that can be used for teaching essay writing and within that she refers
to specific types of essays (essays on books and reading, on writing, on
nature, on issues, and on and on!) she expands on certain teaching
strategies and they link to essay writing, and she talks about literary
craft in essays.  It is a GREAT book!  Check it out if you haven't
already!
Carrie 
K-8, IL
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] RtI - there is hope!

2009-01-17 Thread Carrie Cahill
I am so happy to see the angst over RtI on our listserv these past
couple of days/weeks!!!  RtI is a great concept (help kids early - don't
just let them fail - stop over identifying for special ed, etc.) HOWEVER
the implementation of it in many states - Illinois worst of all - is the
problem.  When I posted my concerns on this listserv a couple of months
(and years) ago I received the most wonderful response from someone -
they referred me to Dr. Linda Dorn's CIM - Comprehensive Intervention
Model - for K-8 students.  Please, please check this out and send it to
every professional in our field that you know!  I had the great
opportunity to hear Dr. Dorn this past week at the Reading Recovery
Conference in Chicago, IL and she has got it figured out!   Her website
is:  www.arliteracymodel.com.  She is based in Little Rock, Arkansas and
she frequently has visitors to her schools.  She also has brought her
model to National-Louis University in Skokie, IL.  Anyone interested in
this can email me off-line for information on the summer workshops being
offered.
 
Lastly, again for Illinois, there is a literacy assessment called, ISEL
(Illinois Snapshot of Early Literacy) that has been officially approved
for use in the RtI model by our State Board of Education.  This is big -
because in the world of Reading First the ISEL was dumped - and it's a
very good literacy assessment - so we should all be very happy that it's
back and approved!!  I would love to talk to others in my state about
this and everything else RtI related.  But, I sincerely hope we keep up
this conversation nation-wide because as Renee said,  The idea that we
need a program to provide instruction, to me, is a blatant slap in the
face to teachers, the reflection of an attitude that teachers are not
smart enough to do their jobs without a so-called expert telling them
what to do.  Well said Renee!
Carrie
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] Twilight

2008-12-12 Thread Carrie Cahill
Is anyone using the book, Twilight, with their students?  If so, what
age group?

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



[MOSAIC] textbook adoption

2008-09-25 Thread Carrie Cahill
We adopted Rigby Literacy by Design last year and we're happy with it.
It is not a basal - although the 3rd-5th graders have a sourcebook
which is pretty darned close to a basal - but it is used for shared and
interactive reading.  Our teachers like it and we embrace the balanced
literacy philosophy.

Carrie

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] writer's workshop

2008-09-25 Thread Carrie Cahill
I'm wondering if the 1st and 2nd grade teachers out there can please
share how they run their writer's workshop - especially at this time
during the school year?

 

Carrie

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



Re: [MOSAIC] textbook adoption

2008-09-25 Thread Carrie Cahill
Midlothian, Illinois - a K-8 district.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Beverlee Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:56 AM
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] textbook adoption

Carrie, where are you?

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Carrie Cahill 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We adopted Rigby Literacy by Design last year and we're happy with
it.
 It is not a basal - although the 3rd-5th graders have a sourcebook
 which is pretty darned close to a basal - but it is used for shared
and
 interactive reading.  Our teachers like it and we embrace the balanced
 literacy philosophy.

 Carrie

 ___
 Mosaic mailing list
 Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
 To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to

http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

 Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.




___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] literacy mapping

2008-09-18 Thread Carrie Cahill
My district is currently mapping our K-6 literacy curriculum.  Big job,
I know!  We have decided to include every strategy at every grade level
- I was excited that our teachers wanted that.  I was wondering what
other people do out there?  I would also love to hear which strategies
you start with in the K, 1 and 2 grades.  

Thanks!

Carrie, IL

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] Making Meaning

2008-01-24 Thread Carrie Cahill
This is our second year with Making Meaning K-6 and our first year with
it in grades 7-8.  Our teachers have overwhelmingly LOVED the program.
I am a district administrator and as a rule I do not favor canned
programs - I would prefer that our teachers learn things from the ground
up and not rely on a script.  However, with Making Meaning I think many
of our teachers have learned the importance of such things as getting
their students actively engaged in literacy by having them turn and talk
often.  We have a large number of new teachers this year and this
program has introduced them to what is important in our district in
terms of literacy in a quick and meaningful way.  We still run new
teacher study groups on Mosaic of Thought so that they have the why
behind the what - but Making Meaning has helped them connect that why
to the what!  We love it - I would highly recommend it!!

 

Carrie

K-8 - Illinois

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] guided reading for older students

2007-11-20 Thread Carrie Cahill
I just wanted to respond to the message below.  I don't want to leave
this conversation with anyone thinking that struggling students - for
whatever reason - can't engage in conversation.  I completely believe
they can!  I haven't seen Caulkins' videos - but I have seen Cris Tovani
and Stephanie Harvey's videos and those children are from some pretty
tough backgrounds and they still (probably because of those
backgrounds!!!) are able to relate to meaty topics in books and have
great conversations.  I have also seen Ellin Keene work with some tough
kids - kids she never met before she sat down to work with them - and
they did a fantastic job. I think Michele said it best a couple of posts
ago - we have to MODEL, MODEL, MODEL and they WILL get it!!!

Carrie

K-8, Illinois

 

 

 

Carrie,

Sorry it took so long for me to respond to you.  Wasn't Lucy great!!!  I
agree with you though.  I have a tough group this year and I really
can't see 

them involved in the conversations that we saw on her videos.   That
doesn't 

mean that I don't like the strategy.  Thanks for the tip on  the book.
I will definitely check it out.  

Michele

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] guided reading for older students

2007-11-14 Thread Carrie Cahill
In response to the message below...I was the person that asked about an
appropriate professional book for junior high teachers to read that
would support them in starting small group reading instruction.  I like
lit/book clubs a lot but I think of those more in terms of what students
might be doing while the teacher is working with a small group.  One
reason - because it would be student-led.  I still think that junior
high students need their teacher as their coach or guide in small
group instruction and that's why we are implementing it in our schools.
Of course the focus is on comprehension along with all the good things
junior high literature students look at: plot, setting, character
development, etc.  The book that was suggested to me from this listserv
has proven to be a really great resource - it is Yellow Brick Roads by
Janet Allen.  It is a really great book and I highly recommend it!!!

 

Carrie

K-8, Illinois   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I heard Lucy Calkins (sorry about that spelling) speak last week in
Detroit. I believe she mentioned 4th - 5th grade as being a good time
for lit. 

clubs.  The most important thing is that the students are trained in how
to handle the lit. club.  She showed videos of clubs in action and you
wouldn't believe the conversation these kids were having.  They need to
be well trained and/or versed in how to handle a club situation. It's
much more than just reading the same book.  You need to model, model and
then model some more.

Michele

 

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] Guided Reading for older students

2007-11-05 Thread Carrie Cahill
Does anyone know of a good professional book for teachers just beginning
the process of differentiated small group reading instruction for junior
high students?  I like the Fountas and Pinnell Guided Reading book, but
its main focus is grades 3-6.

Carrie

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] FW: comprehension assessment

2007-09-20 Thread Carrie Cahill
Sarah asked if anyone knew of a quality comprehension assessment.
Ellin Keene developed one last year and it's very good.  It's called,
Assessing Comprehension Thinking Strategies and it is published by Shell
Educational Publishing.  General think aloud assessments and rubrics
are provided, as well as something for each of the comprehension
strategies (inferring, determining importance).  She provides them
in the form of verbal as well as written - which makes their use
flexible dependent upon the situation for the teacher.  The rubrics
themselves are great teaching tools and I think they even help the
teacher better understand what they should be looking for with each
strategy.  This assessment is so important because it makes us
accountable for teaching the strategies and it holds kids accountable
for internalizing them.  It gets us away from teaching the strategies
for the sake of teaching the strategies.  This assessment shows us if
our strategy teaching is actually leading toward understanding -  which
is the key behind ALL OF THIS!!!

 

Carrie 

K-8,  Illinois 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] RtI

2007-08-14 Thread Carrie Cahill
In response to Carols' question

RtI (Response to Intervention) seems to have been created for good but
is being used for bad.  From what I understand the basic premise is
this; children are over identified for special education and we ALL
(special ed and general ed) need to be responsible for ALL students'
learning.  I also understand that RtI is stopping the practice of
identifying special education students using the discrepancy model
(finding them to qualify based on a discrepancy between their ability
and their performance).  Now, extreme amounts of data gathering will be
required, by the general ed teacher, in order to qualify a student for
special ed.  On its premise that sounds good, right?  I don't think so.
I am convinced that this data collecting will turn out exactly as the
Federal program Reading First where states mandated (yes, MANDATED)
that districts use only approved assessment tools to collect this
data, such as DIBELS (because the Federal Government mandated it).  I
haven't been told this will happen yet, but I strongly believe that it
will.  

 

One of the RtI models is the use of the three tiers of intervention.
This model is not the only one that can be used but for some reason
everyone thinks it is!  With that people are jumping on the bandwagon -
textbook publishers are dictating how we teach by publishing programs
that address each tier of intervention.  Isn't that exactly what MOT
teaching and this listserv is set up to combat - dictated, scripted
teaching?  Tier I is whole class instruction.  Tier II is tighter
intervention given to the bottom level of your class (20%, or so) and
Tier III is for the very bottom 2-5% of your class.  Depending on who
you talk to both Tier II and Tier III can be a pull out situation or
just Tier III.  It doesn't really matter, though, because what it
reminds me of is the old Title I days.  There is no research that the
model of Title I pullout was successful but yet - here we go again!
Doesn't it sound like special education without the name?

 

Something really crucial to consider is this - we keep hearing about
research this and research that when it comes to programs and
instruction.  What is NOT being considered is the strong research base
we ALREADY have in education.  People like P. David Pearson, Michael
Pressley and Richard Allington have been doing this research for 30
years!  Then we have people like Ellin Keene pulling it all
together for us and showing how it can be put into practice in the
classroom.  I really believe that one of the most important things we
could do as a group on this listserv is to not only use the excellent
teaching strategies we talk about in our OWN classrooms but also to talk
to people about what is going on!  Teacher professional development and
professionalism is slowly being chipped away until you will be left with
nothing but a teacher's guide and a script.  The Federal Express guy
could come in and teach in our classes!  And when this happens please
don't blame this on school administrators - this is federal law and is
slowly becoming state law (it already is in Illinois).  The
administrators I work with are extremely concerned about RtI and Reading
First and are talking to everyone they know.  This is something we ALL
have to do.

 

 

Carrie

K-8, Illinois

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] retention question

2007-08-11 Thread Carrie Cahill
Sandi (and others)... 

What I remember about the research on this is mostly from Linda
Darling-Hammond and it's about the training behind the teacher - once
again.  Her research looks at low-income schools and the dire need for
highly qualified (not in the Feds terms, but in professional terms)
teachers in those environments.  Nobody disputes the need for
interventions with struggling students or the fact that it should be
done right away.  So, the primary aged student had a better shot at
success if their needs were addressed asap (I like the idea of needs
being addressed better than interveningintervening sounds too
much like a medical model of diagnose and treat - and I don't believe
that model should be used in the education field.  Intervention also
makes me think of RtI - Response to Intervention - which is probably
going to be the downfall of public education in the end.)  Sorry, I
digress. Anyway, I don't recall specific studies following young
struggling students who were NOT retained, but the point they made was
that we need to focus on the skills of the teacher and the decisions
they make when teaching their students.

 

 

 

Carrie...I have a question, since you did your dissertation on
retention, are there any studies of a child in K or 1st who was a
candidate for retention, but was not retained, how that child did as
they went through the grades?  And this in comparison to a K or 1st who
was retained and in comparison to other low students who weren't
candidates for retention.

 

 

Carrie

K-8, Illinois

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] new basal adoption

2007-03-09 Thread Carrie Cahill
I would caution people in their quest for a new reading program to dig
deep when it comes to leveled reading.  Many or most programs have
leveled readers but they are not all the same.  I don't have specifics
related to specific companies, but some leveled readers don't contain
necessary elements in the non-fiction titles such as a table of contents
or an index - and those are the features you need to teach in
non-fiction!  Also, some of the companies only have leveled readers that
are appropriate for that particular grade level - easy, average and hard
- but only for that grade level.  Last, but certainly not least, the
majority of programs are so scripted that they leave no room for teacher
judgment or differentiation for student needs.  They expect teachers to
cover 10,000 skills in 9 months!  And especially new teachers -for whom
we often justify the need for purchasing a reading series - start off
their career believing that they have to teach all 10,000 of those
skills - which is a real disservice both for teachers as well as for our
kids! 

 

 

Carrie Cahill

K-8 in Illinois

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 



[MOSAIC] time to check in

2007-01-29 Thread Carrie Cahill
I, too, am inspired when Ginger posts her thoughts and experiences with
her students.  I wish everyone posted more of these types of messages!
I will say, in response to Laura's interaction with her Supt., that
Superintendents are faced with the stark reality of test scores and
reporting to the public.  I believe (at least in my case/ my district)
that Supt.'s would LOVE to not have that burden to deal with - but laws
and bureaucracy make it so!  Unfortunately communities are judging
schools based on numbers --- test scores.  I work in a district where
one of our schools in judged in just this way through the media, school
report card, and in all of our interactions with ISBE.  It's unfair.
This school is incredible and none of that is noted.  It's like paddling
upstream!  Parents do come to our schools on a regular basis and they
SEE the great things our teachers are doing with their children - it's
the community at-large (state) that doesn't know or care about those
things.  There really has to be a balance between the time we devote to
testing -and how we report to the community - and the time we spend
nurturing professional development and the great work we do for kids.
Laura - I DO believe administrators can do both!  It might mean that we
end up spending more late nights in our offices  - but we can still be
in classrooms to see that spark in the students' eyes when they've made
a connection or just read a great book - and we can have meaningful
conversations with teachers about how to make those events happen on a
regular basis and not just happy coincidences as Ellin Keene puts it!!
The thing is we might not get all of our paperwork done that day.
Hopefully we're all lucky enough to have bosses who understand that
balance.  I just think it's totally unrealistic to say that
Superintendents should not be overly concerned with test scoresthey
are a reality and they're here to stay!  I hope you don't get out of
administration because of it - it's the exact place we need to be if we
are ever going to make systemic change.

 

Carrie

 

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.