RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

[Ed Aldrich]

No
And…
It Depends, but generally yes… fully integrated with CfgMgr deployment 
policies…. Allows wake on demand and at mandatory schedule execution time

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:09 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

Don’t think you boys talk to the switches do you, instead it’s still an agent 
on every machine right?

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: den 27 juli 2016 18:21
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

“Now that would be a product in its own…”

There already is.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 2:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

I would just implement a PS with the views for wakeup and connect to the 
switches and let them do the WOL.

Now that would be a product in its own but we are just too busy… so just enable 
the Cisco (or other vendor) WOL capabilities and let a PS script connect to 
each switch and wake em up.

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: den 26 juli 2016 18:45
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

FWIW, we at 1E fairly frequently encounter new NightWatchman Enterprise 
opportunities who have struggled with AMT/CfgMgr and been unsuccessful at 
getting it to live up to the promise. This is what brought them to us in the 
first place. There are a number of reasons why this AMT/CfgMgr solution is 
problematic but I won’t go into that here. Just wanted to share a personal 
observation.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

Hello,

Just curious how people are handling this in Current Branch?  My understanding 
is that it will carry over some features when doing an upgrade but a fresh 
install will not allow you to set this up.  Is this in the pipeline or have 
others looked into other options like 1E NightWatchman?

Thanks!





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Todd Hemsell]

Any errors in the component status area related to the state messaging
system or the MP?
Are the machines all reporting to the same MP, same primary? Any
commonality you can tell?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Chris Carbone <
chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:

> Not silly at all, I am willing to look at anything. The client is
> installed, I have a couple of the computers in my office that should be
> appearing but do not. Plus there are other deployments to these machines
> where this is not an issue. None of this makes any sense. :D
>
>
>
> Just to add more confusion. The application that I’m deploying does show
> up in Software Center and if I install it, THEN it will show up under the
> status for that deployment.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:06 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Silly question, but is the client installed on the ones that do not show
> up? You could have added records where the client is not installed. You
> would see them in the collection, but not in status messages, because they
> are not clients.
>
> In the collection view see if the client = yes and active = yes.
>
>
>
>  I have a new collection with 31 members and if I go into that collection
> I see them all.
>
> When I check under deployment status for that software it shows success
> for 1/1 and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other
> category.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, these exist in the limiting “All Workstations” collection. But just
> for the heck of it I just ran the update membership option.
>
>
>
> As for SQL query against the DB go, I do not have access to this which
> also means I cannot use ceviewer tool. I will try again to see if I can
> gain access to the db. Would sure help! J
>
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I already viewed the Colleval.log and nothing
> stuck out but I will look closer to see the logs generated from when these
> new collections were built.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:51 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?'  Update membership of
> limiting collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist
> within it.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer,
> right clicked and added to collection.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or
> otherwise?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511
> and I have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment
> status most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I
> go into that collection the computers do appear.
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Carbone
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not
> seeing all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection
> with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I
> check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1
> and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other
> category.
>
>
>
> I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a
> change with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another
> issue but don’t think this change is related to this new problem.
>
>
>
> Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I
> searched and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Chris
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by 

RE: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Chris Carbone]

Not silly at all, I am willing to look at anything. The client is installed, I 
have a couple of the computers in my office that should be appearing but do 
not. Plus there are other deployments to these machines where this is not an 
issue. None of this makes any sense. :D

Just to add more confusion. The application that I’m deploying does show up in 
Software Center and if I install it, THEN it will show up under the status for 
that deployment.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Silly question, but is the client installed on the ones that do not show up? 
You could have added records where the client is not installed. You would see 
them in the collection, but not in status messages, because they are not 
clients.
In the collection view see if the client = yes and active = yes.

 I have a new collection with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see 
them all.
When I check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 
and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
Yes, these exist in the limiting “All Workstations” collection. But just for 
the heck of it I just ran the update membership option.

As for SQL query against the DB go, I do not have access to this which also 
means I cannot use ceviewer tool. I will try again to see if I can gain access 
to the db. Would sure help! ☺

Thanks for the suggestions. I already viewed the Colleval.log and nothing stuck 
out but I will look closer to see the logs generated from when these new 
collections were built.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?'  Update membership of limiting 
collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist within it.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer, 
right clicked and added to collection.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or otherwise?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I 
have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status 
most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into 
that collection the computers do appear.

From: Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Strange issue with deployments

Hello all,

In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing 
all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 
members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under 
deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, 
the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change 
with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but 
don’t think this change is related to this new problem.

Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched 
and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.

Thanks in advance
Chris
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.



This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as 

Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Todd Hemsell]

Silly question, but is the client installed on the ones that do not show
up? You could have added records where the client is not installed. You
would see them in the collection, but not in status messages, because they
are not clients.
In the collection view see if the client = yes and active = yes.

 I have a new collection with 31 members and if I go into that collection I
see them all.
When I check under deployment status for that software it shows success for
1/1 and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other
category.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Chris Carbone <
chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:

> Yes, these exist in the limiting “All Workstations” collection. But just
> for the heck of it I just ran the update membership option.
>
>
>
> As for SQL query against the DB go, I do not have access to this which
> also means I cannot use ceviewer tool. I will try again to see if I can
> gain access to the db. Would sure help! J
>
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I already viewed the Colleval.log and nothing
> stuck out but I will look closer to see the logs generated from when these
> new collections were built.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:51 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?'  Update membership of
> limiting collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist
> within it.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer,
> right clicked and added to collection.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or
> otherwise?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511
> and I have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment
> status most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I
> go into that collection the computers do appear.
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Carbone
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not
> seeing all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection
> with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I
> check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1
> and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other
> category.
>
>
>
> I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a
> change with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another
> issue but don’t think this change is related to this new problem.
>
>
>
> Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I
> searched and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Chris
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>

RE: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Chris Carbone]

Yes, these exist in the limiting “All Workstations” collection. But just for 
the heck of it I just ran the update membership option.

As for SQL query against the DB go, I do not have access to this which also 
means I cannot use ceviewer tool. I will try again to see if I can gain access 
to the db. Would sure help! ☺

Thanks for the suggestions. I already viewed the Colleval.log and nothing stuck 
out but I will look closer to see the logs generated from when these new 
collections were built.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?'  Update membership of limiting 
collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist within it.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer, 
right clicked and added to collection.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or otherwise?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I 
have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status 
most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into 
that collection the computers do appear.

From: Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Strange issue with deployments

Hello all,

In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing 
all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 
members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under 
deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, 
the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change 
with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but 
don’t think this change is related to this new problem.

Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched 
and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.

Thanks in advance
Chris
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.



This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.



This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.

Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Adam Juelich]

Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?'  Update membership of
limiting collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist
within it.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone <
chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:

> All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer,
> right clicked and added to collection.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or
> otherwise?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone <
> chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote:
>
> Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511
> and I have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment
> status most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I
> go into that collection the computers do appear.
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Carbone
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Strange issue with deployments
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not
> seeing all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection
> with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I
> check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1
> and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other
> category.
>
>
>
> I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a
> change with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another
> issue but don’t think this change is related to this new problem.
>
>
>
> Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I
> searched and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Chris
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>

RE: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Chris Carbone]

All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer, 
right clicked and added to collection.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or otherwise?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone 
> 
wrote:
Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I 
have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status 
most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into 
that collection the computers do appear.

From: Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Strange issue with deployments

Hello all,

In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing 
all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 
members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under 
deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, 
the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change 
with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but 
don’t think this change is related to this new problem.

Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched 
and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.

Thanks in advance
Chris
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.



This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.

[mssms] RE: Strange issue with deployments

[Lindenfeld, Ivan]

Evidently not.

First thing I would do is to look at the membership a different way, such as a 
report (one in Software Distribution - Package and Program Deployment Status)   
or SQL query, which are realtime.  The Deployment Status is not live.  It is 
Summarized and the summarizations are scheduled.

I further suggest using the Collection Evaluation Viewer in the SCCM 2012 R2 
Toolkit, downloadable from Microsoft, to get a better look at the queries 
behind the collection.

Finally, trace the collection refresh in the log, Colleval.log on the site 
server.

We are running 1511 and have not seen this issue.

Ivan Lindenfeld


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:00 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
Subject: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I 
have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status 
most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into 
that collection the computers do appear.

From: Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Strange issue with deployments

Hello all,

In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing 
all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 
members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under 
deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, 
the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change 
with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but 
don't think this change is related to this new problem.

Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched 
and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.

Thanks in advance
Chris
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.


NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately.

[mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

[Enley, Carl]

Awesome - thanks for your help guys. I am pretty sure I can get this to do 
exactly what I need. The last line with the find and replace inside the config 
file was a stumbling block for me that you have solved.

Carl

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:24 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Good point!  Also, I was thinking about this last night (yeah, I'm a dork). You 
could easily just replace the extension value in the existing file (instead of 
creating a completely new one) with something like this:

# Get Active Directory information for current user (Thanks Freddy!)
$UserName = $env:username
$Filter = "(&(objectCategory=User)(samAccountName=$UserName))"
$Searcher = New-Object System.DirectoryServices.DirectorySearcher
$Searcher.Filter = $Filter
$ADUserPath = $Searcher.FindOne()
$ADUser = $ADUserPath.GetDirectoryEntry()
$ADTelePhoneNumber = $ADUser.telephoneNumber

#Replace value in config file
(Get-Content c:\scripts\test.txt) -replace '\[EXTENSION\]', $ADTelePhoneNumber 
| Set-Content c:\scripts\test.txt


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Freddy Grande
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:45 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Does that not require RSAT being installed on each client computer?
You might be better off replacing the first two lines with something like this:
# Get Active Directory information for current user
$UserName = $env:username
$Filter = "(&(objectCategory=User)(samAccountName=$UserName))"
$Searcher = New-Object System.DirectoryServices.DirectorySearcher
$Searcher.Filter = $Filter
$ADUserPath = $Searcher.FindOne()
$ADUser = $ADUserPath.GetDirectoryEntry()
$ADTelePhoneNumber = $ADUser.telephoneNumber

You can clean that up and change variables to fit with your script. Just 
grabbed this off my Outlook Signatures script that runs on each client computer 
as users to build their signatures from AD attributes.

Regards,
Freddy

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 9:56 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Here's some more. I'm just tinkering, I'm sure there's a PowerShell expert or 
50 on this list that could come up with something better. But this would let 
you build the config file on the fly.

Import-Module ActiveDirectory
$phone = Get-ADUser -Identity $env:USERNAME -Properties * | Select-Object 
-ExpandProperty TelephoneNumber

$text = "First Line: Settings Here"
$text = $text + "`r`n"
$text = $text + "Second Line: Settings Here"
$text = $text + "`r`n"
$text = $text + "Extenstion: "
$text = $text + $phone
$text | Out-File C:\Scripts\test.txt


The "`r`n" is a CR-LF.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 4:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Here's some basic stuff to get you started. You could read the logged in user 
and search their AD user record:

Import-Module ActiveDirectory
Get-ADUser -Identity $env:USERNAME -Properties * | Select-Object 
-ExpandProperty TelephoneNumber | Out-File C:\Scripts\Config.txt

This writes the phone number to a text file. I'm sure you could manipulate this 
to create the config file you want.

Mike

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 2:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Perhaps I am not being clear - I have a package built already, I have the user 
settings and the system settings already worked out. When the application is 
launched the user is prompted to enter their phone extension. I know where this 
information is stored in the config file but I do not know how to query Active 
Directory attribute to retrieve phone extension and then insert this value into 
my config file.

Thanks
Carl

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Craig
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 3:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Scripting - Pwr Shell AD Attributes

Sorry, I didn't read your email properly.

You want to separate the system installation from the user settings,(config 
file).

Powershell app deployment 

[mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

[Chris Carbone]

Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I 
have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status 
most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into 
that collection the computers do appear.

From: Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Strange issue with deployments

Hello all,

In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing 
all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 
members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under 
deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, 
the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category.

I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change 
with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but 
don't think this change is related to this new problem.

Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched 
and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem.

Thanks in advance
Chris
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.