Re: no 'message-hook'?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:40:28 +, Benjamin Smith wrote: Yes, this appeared sometime around 1.3.2x, although it is certainly worth upgrading as the 1.3 versions seem quite stable and have many new features (plus improved IMAP) over 1.2. Thanks for your suggestion. I would however rather wait for the package to arrive for my Debian Woody distribution and upgrade than. I am quite happy with mutt as I have it (the IMAP improvements do make it attractive) Is there some alternative I can use? One option is just to unignore the X-Spam headers for every message. I will do that, for the time being. Thanks again. -- Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no 'message-hook'?
Erik van der Meulen wrote: Thanks for your suggestion. I would however rather wait for the package to arrive for my Debian Woody distribution and upgrade than. I am quite happy with mutt as I have it (the IMAP improvements do make it attractive) the current version of mutt in woody is 1.3.27. ladd% dpkg -l | grep mutt ii mutt 1.3.27-2 Text-based mailreader supporting MIME, GPG, ladd% cat /etc/debian_version 3.0 perhaps you're running potato? in either event, i doubt it would be hard to build the unstable package on a potato machine, and it's very simple to build mutt from source on potato as well. -- William Yardley GnuPG public key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
Re: no 'message-hook'?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 00:31:33 -0800, Will Yardley wrote: the current version of mutt in woody is 1.3.27. ladd% dpkg -l | grep mutt ii mutt 1.3.27-2 Text-based mailreader supporting MIME, GPG, ladd% cat /etc/debian_version 3.0 perhaps you're running potato? Ah - thanks! I needed to change the 'non-us' entry in the apt-sources file of course! Best regards. -- Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: colour, long URLs, and wrapping?
Martin -- ...and then Martin Karlsson said... % % Hi all. Hello! % % Question 1: % % My editor is vim, and I wrap lines at 68. Good for you :-) % % When confronted with a 'longer-than-68' URL, my colourization-regexp % won't cath the second-line part of the URL, e.g. % % http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.ht % ml That's because this has been broken into two lines; see how it looks above now that it's been scooted over for quoting. % % What do I need in my regexp to make this work? Right now I have: % % (http|ftp|news|telnet|finger)://[^ ]* % % Additional improvements is also welcome :-) Nothing, really, aside from not inserting a line break anywhere. You should find this http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html to be colored completely and correctly, no? % % Question 2: % % The above URL is actually 83 chars, and wrapped at 81. I suppose I'm % missing something, since (I believe) I'm wrapping at 68? % % set editor=vim \ % -c 'set tw=68 et' I dunno why it should wrap at 81 unless you manually inserted a line feed. vim will only break at white spaces and won't force a break in the line, which is why that line went on past 68 chars (try typing a long URL with embedded spaces for fun -- ugh!). Can you provide further details? % % -- % Martin Karlsson | I welcome mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! % keyid fingerprint in headers % visit http://www.gnupg.org for more info :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg24745/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mailboxes list
Kyle, et al -- ...and then Kyle Rawlins said... % % I want to have two different sets of mailboxes (one for each mailing list) and As we've seen, there's no official way. I am interested in Nicolas's patch, though. Since you've already stated that you consider your mailboxes in two different sets, what about just separating them into two different directories or with two different prefixes? You could then specify an initial pattern and see only the pertinent half. For instance, I (for historical reasons :-) dump all of my incoming mail into =F.* and could simply change some names to =F.music-* and =F.work-* and go from there. Since the folders are all under $HOME/Mail, however, I could also create $HOME/Mail/F.music and $HOME/Mail/F.work and have procmail write to folders in there -- or not even bother to change my filtering config but instead simply cd $HOME/Mail mv F.music1 F.music ln -s F.music/F.music1 and let procmail hit the symlink. [In fact, this is what I have done for some work-related folders that go under =D.work/*, as outlined some time ago on the list, and even for my KotLBJL and other alternate-identity mail. To wit: [zero] [7:05am] ~/Mail ls -lFd F* | grep -- '-.*/' | cut -c47- F.bb - D.work/F.bb F.bulbs - ../Hosting/bulbs.justpickone.org/Mailbox F.mgm - /home/mgm/Hosting/www.milliongunmarch.org/Mailbox There was quite a thread on mail folder organization a while back; that might provide some interesting ideas. HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg24746/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: eudora-style detachment (was Re: Deleted attachment)
Tom, et al -- ...and then Thomas Baker said... % % If you will excuse the somewhat related newbie question, can Mutt be Hrmmm... [S]omewhat related, indeed. You've *almost* changed topics without starting a new thread ;-) % configured automatically to collect incoming attachments as files in a % designated directory? Eudora does this, and knows how to append % numbers if multiple attachments of the same name come in. For certain % types of work, this feature can be very convenient, sparing one the % trouble of saving each attachment individually. I don't know how to make mutt do that, but that's immaterial; this can easily be handled by your incoming mail filter (such as procmail), with the location of the detached files either in the message (mangling -- ugh) or in the headers (much better). Give the man pages for procmail and formail a whirl (or wait for the inevitable deluge of messages touting anything other the procmail and take your pick of the suggestions). % % Tom HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg24747/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: eudora-style detachment (was Re: Deleted attachment)
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote: % configured automatically to collect incoming attachments as files in a % designated directory? Eudora does this, and knows how to append % numbers if multiple attachments of the same name come in. For certain % types of work, this feature can be very convenient, sparing one the % trouble of saving each attachment individually. I don't know how to make mutt do that, but that's immaterial; this can easily be handled by your incoming mail filter (such as procmail), with the location of the detached files either in the message (mangling -- ugh) or in the headers (much better). Give the man pages for procmail and formail a whirl (or wait for the inevitable deluge of messages touting anything other the procmail and take your pick of the suggestions). Ah, I believe this assumes I am using Mutt under Linux/Unix, as I am not aware of any Windows binaries for Procmail. No matter -- after struggling to get a decent set-up of Mutt with Cygwin, I have decided to go ahead and run Linux on VMWare (on WIN2000). I am assured this should work fine. And I'd get not just Procmail, but also Pcal, Mpage, and Urlview. Thank you for the suggestion, Tom ___ Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
Re: eudora-style detachment (was Re: Deleted attachment)
Tom, et al -- ...and then Thomas Baker said... % % On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote: % % configured automatically to collect incoming attachments as files in a ... % % I don't know how to make mutt do that, but that's immaterial; this can % easily be handled by your incoming mail filter (such as procmail), with ... % % Ah, I believe this assumes I am using Mutt under Linux/Unix, as I am Er, yes, indeed it does. % not aware of any Windows binaries for Procmail. No matter -- after % struggling to get a decent set-up of Mutt with Cygwin, I have decided I suppose you could, if you got that far, then compile procmail as well. % to go ahead and run Linux on VMWare (on WIN2000). I am assured this This sounds pretty slick; I hadn't kept up with vmware enough to know that it will [perhaps only now] run Linux under Windows as I've now seen mentioned twice. That could be interesting in a work environment where one just plain isn't going to get a Linux machine... % should work fine. And I'd get not just Procmail, but also Pcal, Mpage, % and Urlview. A whole world of good programs, eh? :-) % % Thank you for the suggestion, HTH! % Tom HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg24749/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Pretty print filters
This may be outside the scope of mutt per se, but can anyone recommend a good pretty print filter for mboxes? I used to use mp under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not know of equivalents elsewhere. mp would send an mbox to the printer with pruned headers and a formfeed between each message -- optionally, two pages on one, so printing double-sided I could print out four pages on one sheet of paper. Ideally, such a program could detect and skip binary attachments, but I should think it would need to be pretty sophisticated to do so reliably. Thanks, Tom ___ Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
Re:Pretty print filters
Tom, 1) Check if muttprint works under solaris too: http://home.t-online.de/home/f.walle/muttprint/ 2) Personally I don't use it because I have relatively old computers, and installing a mammoth like latex just to pretty print some messages doesn't look smart in that situation. YMMV. 3) Don;t you have enscript on your solaris box? It might work. On the same note, may I ask you your mp commands? TIA, Marco Fioretti RULE: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/ This may be outside the scope of mutt per se, but can anyone recommend a good pretty print filter for mboxes? I used to use mp under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not know of equivalents elsewhere. mp would send an mbox to the printer with pruned headers and a formfeed between each message -- optionally, two pages on one, so printing double-sided I could print out four pages on one sheet of paper. Ideally, such a program could detect and skip binary attachments, but I should think it would need to be pretty sophisticated to do so reliably. Thanks, Tom ___ Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
sourcing config options
-- Dear List - I have just upgraded mutt to 1.3.27 (from 1.2.5) and thought that this would be a good time to 'clean-up' my configuration files. For that I have used the nice examples found on: http://www.davep.org/mutt/muttrc/ This uses a small .muttrc which sources external files in the .mutt directory. One thing that I cannot seem to get to work is this: In my old .muttrc I had an entry: mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*.incoming` which made sure that all my mailbox folders that procmail fills (*.incoming) are checked for new mail. If I move this line to ~/.mutt/mailboxes which is sourced into the .muttrc, this no longer works. Is there some alternative, or do I just have to write out each and every mailbox? Thanks for any suggestions! -- Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sourcing config options
Erik -- ...and then Erik van der Meulen said... % % -- Did you mean to put sigdashes up here and potentially throw away your entire message? :-) % Dear List - I have just upgraded mutt to 1.3.27 (from 1.2.5) and thought Yay for you! % that this would be a good time to 'clean-up' my configuration files. For % that I have used the nice examples found on: Good idea. % % http://www.davep.org/mutt/muttrc/ % % This uses a small .muttrc which sources external files in the .mutt % directory. One thing that I cannot seem to get to work is this: % % In my old .muttrc I had an entry: % % mailboxes `echo $HOME/mail/*.incoming` Sounds good enough. % % which made sure that all my mailbox folders that procmail fills % (*.incoming) are checked for new mail. If I move this line to % ~/.mutt/mailboxes which is sourced into the .muttrc, this no longer % works. % Is there some alternative, or do I just have to write out each and every % mailbox? You really shouldn't have to, and it really ought to work. That's the interesting part. Why and how does it no longer work? Do you get any error messages? Does it work if you source the include file manually from within mutt? Does it work under 1.3.27 if you move it back into your main muttrc file? Are you sure there are no typos involved? Have you changed the source order around to try sourcing this sub-file first (if it isn't already)? Have you tried an empty main muttrc that simply sources another muttrc with only that command to eliminate any conflicts you might have written in the rest of your config? Finally, have you tried any or all of this while running mutt in debug mode to get lots of detail? % % Thanks for any suggestions! HTH HAND % % -- % Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg24753/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Message-ID lost with decode-save
Threads are lost because the decode-save function strips the Message-ID from the header. Is there a way around this ? -- Regards, Emil -- In the amount of time it took you to read this .sig Voyager I has traveled approximately 130 KM
Re: eudora-style detachment (was Re: Deleted attachment)
Thomas Baker wrote: Ah, I believe this assumes I am using Mutt under Linux/Unix, as I am not aware of any Windows binaries for Procmail. I haven't tried myself, but you might give a look at Ulf Erikson's website (http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt/) especially the tools page. -- Cedric
Re: SMTP Authorization
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:36:49PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: On 23/02/02 Jerry Van Brimmer did speaketh: Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all messages into my mailbox and the headers would be displayed in the index, sort of just like all others, i.e. Sylpheed. I thought Mutt was a downloader/reader all in one? Am I wrong? Mutt follows the Unix philosophy of doing one thing, and doing it well. My current setup is Mutt for reading/composing email, fetchmail to download, procmail to sort, exim to send. In this way, I can swap any component that I like and I don't lose my other specialists. Far superior to a monolithic application that tries to do it all, and does it badly. This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so tired now as to seem almost pre-recorded. (Where do you guys get that propaganda anyway?) The keyword with mutt is integration: imap and pop are integrated with mutt becauses it makes sense to _browse_ remote imap or pop folders (yes mutt can do that with pop) and save stuff to remote imap folders (try that with fetchmail). Real unix purists use uucp to download mail anyway, not fetchmail. -- PHEDRE: Non, je ne puis souffrir un bonheur qui m'outrage, OEnone. Prends pitié de ma jalouse rage. (Phèdre, J-B Racine, acte 4, scène 6)
Re: eudora-style detachment (was Re: Deleted attachment)
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Cedric Duval wrote: Thomas Baker wrote: Ah, I believe this assumes I am using Mutt under Linux/Unix, as I am not aware of any Windows binaries for Procmail. I haven't tried myself, but you might give a look at Ulf Erikson's website (http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt/) especially the tools page. There seem to be two basic approaches to porting such programs to Win32: porting them as native Win32 (using msvcrt.dll) and porting them for use over an emulation layer, such as Cygwin or David Korn's equivalent. Ulf's port is in the native tradition, but he seems to say on his page that the Cygwin napproach is more comprehensive. I have already tried out the Cygwin approach and have the impression that it could be made to work quite well, but it does require (as the Unixmail Readme.txt explicitly warns) considerable tweaking, and I am not a programmer. For now, then, I have been persuaded that the path of least resistance will be to install VMWare for Windows, then install Linux within VMWare, as the Linux distributions already include most of the things one would have to scratch together from Web sites here and there for an equivalent setup under Cygwin or native Win32. I would be grateful for any warnings to the contrary. Tom Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft mobile +49-171-408-5784 Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
Re: no 'message-hook'?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Erik van der Meulen on Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:49:13AM +0100: I have found in some Spamassassin document the tip to include: message-hook ~h X-Spam-Status:.*tests=.+ unignore X-Spam in .muttrc, in order to show this particular spam-header. Unfortunately, my mutt version (1.2.5i) does not really like this. I'll update that doc soon to mention that the hook is only available in more recent versions of Mutt. - -- [!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/174673.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8emcC94d6K8nEDDERAjuOAJ48HbgIc8hnGoGZgihimzOVTILmBQCfRTHT sPKf3TSWOJdSYIH/FvV8zRQ= =2gYE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Maildir problem
hello, if I use mbox format, when I press c then ? I've got all my box listed and those with new mail on top. Now, since I use Maildir format, they are listed by order of creation of the directory. So 'inbox' ie is at the end of the list, even if I've got new mails on it. How can reorder this ? I can't find any variable in the manual. cu, binny ps: sorry for my bad english -- Le but du mathématicien est de comprendre le sens de ce qu'il dit. -- Unknown °v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED] _o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net
pre-send actions
Are there any hooks in mutt for taking actions immediately before sending a message (e.g. caching recipient lists for later use), or should I just create a wrapper for sendmail? -- Sweth. -- Sweth Chandramouli ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] President, Idiopathic Systems Consulting
Re: Pretty print filters
Thomas Baker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This may be outside the scope of mutt per se, but can anyone recommend a good pretty print filter for mboxes? I used to use mp under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not know of equivalents elsewhere. I use a program called a2ps to format printing from mutt. Here is my print_command set in my .muttrc: print_command=fmt --prefix='' -s | fmt -s | a2ps -b -R -1 --borders=no --pretty-print=mail You can adjust the options that a2ps uses to print so that you can do what you talked about with having four pages on one printed page. Hope that gets you started. -- Robert Berkowitz With a rubber duck, one's never alone. - Douglas Adams msg24761/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Alias Groups
How best to maintain groups of email addresses? I need to list about 10 people that I want to reference with one alias. Just like in (I hate to say it) Outlook. -- Michael Montagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.boora.com
Re: Pretty print filters
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Robert Berkowitz wrote: Thomas Baker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This may be outside the scope of mutt per se, but can anyone recommend a good pretty print filter for mboxes? I used to use mp under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not know of equivalents elsewhere. I use a program called a2ps to format printing from mutt. Here is my print_command set in my .muttrc: print_command=fmt --prefix='' -s | fmt -s | a2ps -b -R -1 --borders=no --pretty-print=mail You can adjust the options that a2ps uses to print so that you can do what you talked about with having four pages on one printed page. Hope that gets you started. Thank you! In http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/a2ps/2002-January/000800.html I learn that a2ps is apparently difficult to port as a native Win32 application but works okay under Cygwinto . Tom Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft mobile +49-171-408-5784 Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
Re: pre-send actions
Sweth Chandramouli muttered: Are there any hooks in mutt for taking actions immediately before sending a message (e.g. caching recipient lists for later use), or should I just create a wrapper for sendmail? Mutt cashes (history) such things. Try up and down. HTH, Michael -- On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK' - everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS. (By Tarl Neustaedter) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: Alias Groups
Michael Montagne muttered: How best to maintain groups of email addresses? I need to list about 10 people that I want to reference with one alias. Just like in (I hate to say it) Outlook. RTFM 3.2 Defining/Using aliases Usage: alias key address [ , address, ... ] It's usually very cumbersome to remember or type out the address of someone you are communicating with. Mutt allows you to create ``aliases'' which map a short string to a full address. Note: if you want to create an alias for a group (by specifying more than one address), you must separate the addresses with a comma (``,''). Even recurive aliases work: alias joe joe user [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias Me [EMAIL PROTECTED], joe, [EMAIL PROTECTED],... HTH, Michael -- Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. (By Stephan Zielinski) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: Pretty print filters
Quoting Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25 Feb-02 14:50]: On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote: 3) Don;t you have enscript on your solaris box? It might work. Yes, but I don't believe it has any special functions for filtering and formatting email headers. Enscript does; pass the -Email (that's a -E followed by 'mail'). (darren) -- We are not who we think we are. We are not who others think we are. We are who we think others think we are. -- Anonymous
Change the date format on index
Hi! I would like to change my index to look instead of: L 66 Feb 22 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here... to: L 66 Feb 22 2002 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here... I read the %d uses the $date_format, but the actual date_format does not matches the existing index_format (it should be showing the year and it does not). Help, anyone? Cheers, -- David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/ College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida I have no particular talent. I am merely inquisitive. smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature
Re: Change the date format on index
Quoting David Collantes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25 Feb-02 15:20]:
I would like to change my index to look instead of:
L 66 Feb 22 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
to:
L 66 Feb 22 2002 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
I read the %d uses the $date_format, but the actual date_format
does not matches the existing index_format (it should be
showing the year and it does not). Help, anyone?
What does your index_format look like? Have you seen this part
of the index_format description:
%{fmt}
the date and time of the message is converted to sender's time
zone, and ``fmt'' is expanded by the library function
``strftime''; a leading bang disables locales
%[fmt]
the date and time of the message is converted to the local time
zone, and ``fmt'' is expanded by the library function
``strftime''; a leading bang disables locales
%(fmt)
the local date and time when the message was received. ``fmt''
is expanded by the library function ``strftime''; a leading bang
disables locales
%fmt
the current local time. ``fmt'' is expanded by the library
function ``strftime''; a leading bang disables locales.
So, use something like:
%{%b %e %Y}
in that spot, and that should do it.
(darren)
--
Language is not neutral. It is not merely a vehicle which carries ideas.
It is itself a shaper of ideas.
-- Dale Spender
Re: Change the date format on index
On [25/02/02] 14:57, David Collantes wrote:
L 66 Feb 22 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
to:
L 66 Feb 22 2002 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
in 'index_format' use %d (or %D if you prefer local time zone) for
the date (instead of default '%{%b %d}' ) and then define
date_format = %b %d %Y
where:
%b - abbreviation of month (according to locales)
%d - day of month
%Y - year (4 digit)
For more see 'man date'.
Radek
--
+--+
| Radek Spacil, research assistant,|
| WLan project, Telecommunication laboratory |
| Lappeenranta University of Technology|
| www: http://www.lut.fi/~spacil/|
+--+
msg24770/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Change the date format on index
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:36:33PM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
[... SNIP ...]
change from:
L 66 Feb 22 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
to:
L 66 Feb 22 2002 To mutt-users@mutt. ( 0.2K) The Subject goes here...
I read the %d uses the $date_format, but the actual date_format
does not matches the existing index_format (it should be
showing the year and it does not). Help, anyone?
What does your index_format look like? Have you seen this part
of the index_format description:
%{fmt}
the date and time of the message is converted to sender's time
zone, and ``fmt'' is expanded by the library function
``strftime''; a leading bang disables locales
[ ... SNIP ...]
So, use something like:
%{%b %e %Y}
Right on the spot! I had to change header_format though...
Thanks! and cheers,
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
Two things are omnipresent in the Universe: Hydrogen and my Stupidity.
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
Re: SMTP Authorization
On 2002.02.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jerry Van Brimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . pop_authenticate: Using any available method. AUTH CRAM-MD5 + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdGVtYWlsLmFjZXdlYi5uZXQ+ mutt_sasl_cb_authname: getting authname for pop3.ispwest.com:110 mutt_sasl_cb_pass: getting password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]@pop3.ispwest.com:110 amVycnl2YkBpc3B3ZXN0LmNvbSAxNGI0MjNiMmQ5ODQyNGNjYjY2OTNhZDM2MWM0MTBlMg== +OK jerryvb's mailbox has 665 message(s) (2526032 octets) SASL authentication failed. APOP [EMAIL PROTECTED] c6157f678c257df79923897ddf14ab04 -ERR unknown or invalid command in this state [APOP] APOP authentication failed. USER [EMAIL PROTECTED] -ERR unknown or invalid command in this state [USER] Login failed. USER: unknown or invalid command in this state [USER] This seems like a disagreement between what happens and what mutt expects to happen. You're authenticating using CRAM-MD5, and the POP server is validating the authentication. Then mutt thinks that is rejected it, so it tries other authentications, which the server does reject, since it's not expecting an authentication anymore. In other words, this looks like a mutt bug. You might try setting $pop_authenticators to work around this. The goal would be not to try authenticating with MD5 -- for example: set pop_authenticators=apop:user -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: SMTP Authorization
On 2002.02.25, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words, this looks like a mutt bug. You might try setting $pop_authenticators to work around this. The goal would be not to try authenticating with MD5 -- for example: set pop_authenticators=apop:user Oops, I mean that you want not to authenticate using SASL, so you could try this: set pop_authenticators=digest-md5:apop:user -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
gpg not cleanly exiting....?
hi, i use gpg 1.0 on Solaris 8 with the sample gpg.rc (paths modified, etc.). all operations work correctly, except that when gpg is done, it doesn't seem to return to mutt. For example, on an email that is signed, when i try to read the message, mutt prompts me to verify the sig. i hit yes, mutt prints Invoking PGP. and nothing else happens. if i hit Ctrl-C, i drop into the pager with the gpg output and the signed email displayed correctly, including the part about the signature being verified. this leads me to believe that the child process is not exiting cleanly when gpg exits. could someone point out what could be wrong? TIA, sridhar -- Sridhar Srinivasan You cannot kill time without injuring eternity.
Re: feature `ask-no' for compose/toggle-unlink
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote: And I think people don't want to read the _whole_ manual before start using Mutt. Hey, I've read the whole manual, but I still missed it :) Now I'm a bit more relaxed, because I've found brilliant little tool to extract messages from yahoogroups archives into mbox format. Looks like I'm gonna restore my deleted mailbox... And I still LOVE mutt :) Regards -- _.|._ |_ _.: Adam Byrtek, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_|||_)| |(_|: gg 1802819, pgp 0xB25952C0 |
Re: gpg not cleanly exiting....?
Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: i use gpg 1.0 on Solaris 8 with the sample gpg.rc (paths modified, etc.). all operations work correctly, except that when gpg is done, it doesn't seem to return to mutt. sorry to not have anything useful to contribute... BUT - there are bugs with versions of GnuPG up to 1.0.6. are you using 1.0.0? 1.0.4? 1.0.4 is the latest version available on the freeware site; i'm not sure how easy it is to install 1.0.6 without installing the package that gives you a /dev/random (forget what it is off the top of my head). -- William Yardley GnuPG public key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
Re: gpg not cleanly exiting....?
sWill Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] may have typed [02/02/25 17:55]: Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: i use gpg 1.0 on Solaris 8 with the sample gpg.rc (paths modified, etc.). all operations work correctly, except that when gpg is done, it doesn't seem to return to mutt. sorry to not have anything useful to contribute... BUT - there are bugs with versions of GnuPG up to 1.0.6. are you using 1.0.0? 1.0.4? 1.0.4 is the latest version available on the freeware site; i'm not sure how easy it is to install 1.0.6 without installing the package that gives you a /dev/random (forget what it is off the top of my head). sorry, should have mentioned that ~ gpg -h gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.0 Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the file COPYING for details. Supported algorithms: Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, TWOFISH Pubkey: ELG-E, DSA, ELG Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160 -- Sridhar Srinivasan Only Robinson Crusoe had everything done by Friday --- Anonymous
Re: gpg not cleanly exiting....?
Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: sorry, should have mentioned that ~ gpg -h gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.0 well as i said, you should really consider upgrading, at least if you're using it to send signed / encrypted mail. eek.. .that is the current version on sunfreeware - i thought they had 1.0.4 at least. you might try installing SUNWski which provides a /dev/random of sorts... and do a google search on gnupg and solaris. if possible, i'd suggest installing a newer version (especially since it may well fix your problem). here's another /dev/random for solaris link: http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/ solaris 9 has its own... i'm going to install the second link, and try building gnupg on a solaris 8 machine, so i'll email you off list if i'm successful. -- William Yardley GnuPG public key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
Re: Deleted attachment
Adam Byrtek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO it sucks... mutt isn't a file manager, and it shouldn't allow deleting files on my HD. The biggest user of the (u)nlink feature of Mutt.. is Mutt itself. Every mail that you send has some form of temporary attachment (even if it's just the main attachment), and this temporary file needs to be deleted. So Mutt marks any temp files it creates, with the - flag, so that it will be deleted after the compose is done. Even if you quit. You still want the temp files to be deleted. If you mark an attachment with the unlink flag, then you are telling Mutt that your file has the same disposition as any of its temp files. -- David DeSimone | The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid. -- Gilbert K. Chesterson Richardson IT|PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
How to avoid and handle looong lines
Hello: I use Mutt 1.3.27i on RH Linux 7.2 I correspond with someone who uses Mutt/1.2.5i on Debian (???) When I get email from him, his lines are very long and mutt has to wrap them. It appears as if carriage returns aren't being inserted until a new paragraph is created. When I respond it's a major inconvenience because the quoted line is *way past* the right margin. So I have 2 questions: 1)Is there a way to automatically reformat a llooong quoted line? 2)What can I tell my friend so that he can avoid doing this? BTW: I am using vim 6.0, up to patch 204 or so. Cheers! -- Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johnsons-web.com
Re: How to avoid and handle looong lines
Tim Johnson wrote: I use Mutt 1.3.27i on RH Linux 7.2 I correspond with someone who uses Mutt/1.2.5i on Debian (???) When I get email from him, his lines are very long and mutt has to wrap them. tell him to wrap his lines in his editor. how to do this will vary depending on the editor he's using. if he's using vi (probably nvi in debian), setting wm=8 should work. using vim, set tw=74. emacs i'm not sure, but i doubt it's that hard. So I have 2 questions: 1)Is there a way to automatically reformat a llooong quoted line? check the archives. use gqip in vim, or else use a program like par if you want to get fancier with your reformatting. -- William Yardley GnuPG public key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
Re: How to avoid and handle looong lines
I don't have a mutt solution. You can just hit the reply button and get the letter in vim. Then, in the command mode, you can reformat it easily with: !}fmt You can map this sequence to a key. I use g. This is very convenient. Joel On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:50:04PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: Hello: I use Mutt 1.3.27i on RH Linux 7.2 I correspond with someone who uses Mutt/1.2.5i on Debian (???) When I get email from him, his lines are very long and mutt has to wrap them. It appears as if carriage returns aren't being inserted until a new paragraph is created. When I respond it's a major inconvenience because the quoted line is *way past* the right margin. So I have 2 questions: 1)Is there a way to automatically reformat a llooong quoted line? 2)What can I tell my friend so that he can avoid doing this? BTW: I am using vim 6.0, up to patch 204 or so. Cheers! -- Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johnsons-web.com
Re: How to avoid and handle looong lines
On 25/02/02 Will Yardley did speaketh: tell him to wrap his lines in his editor. how to do this will vary depending on the editor he's using. if he's using vi (probably nvi in debian), setting wm=8 should work. using vim, set tw=74. emacs i'm not sure, but i doubt it's that hard. In Emacs, he should turn on auto-fill-mode. check the archives. use gqip in vim, or else use a program like par if you want to get fancier with your reformatting. E-q in Emacs Mike -- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08 ...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount of nerd-like effort. -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix msg24783/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Pretty print filters
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: Quoting Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25 Feb-02 14:50]: On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote: 3) Don;t you have enscript on your solaris box? It might work. Yes, but I don't believe it has any special functions for filtering and formatting email headers. Enscript does; pass the -Email (that's a -E followed by 'mail'). I had never noticed that before. The command enscript --help-pretty-print lists about twenty other file types that can be prettified. Great stuff. Thanks, Tom Dr. Thomas Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft mobile +49-171-408-5784 Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
