Re: The browser
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:51:11PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press > > enter? > > Yes I have. There was a thread regarding this a while ago. It seems to > be when you enter a folder, return to the mailbox view, and then new > mail comes into the original folder, no matter which folder you then > select, it will go into the original folder. > > This has been frustrating me for some time, but I haven't managed to > find a fix --- yet. Yep, this is exactly what happens, and I agree with you it's very frustrating. :) Another frustrating thing that happens is that the new-mail indicator doesn't work on that box even if it actually contains new massages. :-( Johan
Re: The browser
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:16:41AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 16:44]: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox > > when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place > > the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? > > no. tell us about it! fat finger syndrome, maybe? ;-) I don't think so, but could very much likely have been so though. :-) Try to reproduce it with the info in John Iverssons post above and share your opinions. :-) /Johan - maybe not so fat-fingered after all? :)
Re: The browser
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:58:13AM -0700, John Iverson wrote: > * On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're > > in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some > > mailbox and press enter? > > This happens when you get new mail in the last mailbox you > visited after going to the browser. Mutt thinks you should see > the new mail in your 'current' mailbox instead of what you told > it to do. > > Another problem is that the new mail indicator for that mailbox > doesn't work in the browser. It's been discussed a couple of > times, but I guess it's a side effect of Mutt's design. > > What I've done is create a macro to go to the browser, which > first visits a mailbox that doesn't receive mail. This seems to > be at least a work around for this behavior: > > macro index "=postponed?" "Browse >folders" Ah, thanks alot! This explains that other thing that has been bugging me with sometimes not getting the N flag although there actually are new mails in that box. I'm going to try that macro out, although some kind of fix would be nice since this behavour is not very logical. Once again thanks, I've been so frustrated over this thing... :-) Regards, Johan Svedberg -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
The browser
Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
Re: $check-new -> TSM problem?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:58]: > > Sven Guckes wrote: > > > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d > > > > Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. > > TSM? TSM Tivoli Storage Manager The backup system we use. Read in the manual that this could be the problem, but now the admin says that it's not and mutt is compiled the right way on the system. So I'm confused again. I don't have anything like biff touching the files (I think)... Johan
Re: $check-new
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:40:07AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. Johan
Re: $check-new
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:30:31PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 13:15]: > > I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have > > this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ > > check-new Although I'm experienceing some "buggy" behaivor by > > mutt. Sometimes (I can't see a pattern) it doesn't give the > > mailbox the "N" flag marking new mails, although there really > > are new mails in that box because I can see the filesize of the > > mailbox change and when I enter it there are new mails in it. > > Has anyone else seen this? > > yes, it has been reported about a dozen times now. -> archive My search skills must suck, because I can't find anything. :-( Do you (or anyone else) have the strength to explain? :) Johan Svedberg
$check-new
Hi, all. I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ check-new Although I'm experienceing some "buggy" behaivor by mutt. Sometimes (I can't see a pattern) it doesn't give the mailbox the "N" flag marking new mails, although there really are new mails in that box because I can see the filesize of the mailbox change and when I enter it there are new mails in it. Has anyone else seen this? -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
Re: An idea (was: In-Reply-To colors)
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Hmmm, what about generating your own Message-ID header? Like > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' then I could set a more accurate EXPR. But will that > screw other things up? Hmmm, that would brake against some ISO standard? :)
Re: In-Reply-To colors
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:10:08AM -0500, David Rock wrote: > How about: > folder-hook . "color index green black '~Q'" > > According to section 4.2: > ~Q messages which have been replied to No. That's messages which I have replied to, ie messages that has the 'r' flag. Regards, Johan Svedberg
Re: An idea (was: In-Reply-To colors)
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:31:30PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: > > At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with: > > > Hi, everybody. > > > > Hallo :-) > > > > > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've > > > written. This is what I've got now: > > > > > folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'" > > > > Try this: > > > > folder-hook . "color index green black ~P" > > > > The drawback is, that all mails from you get colored, not only your replys. > > Ah, yeah, I know. See, I also have this in my config :-): > > folder-hook . "color index brightgreen black '~P'" > > (Both lines copied from Sven) > Hmmm, what about generating your own Message-ID header? Like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' then I could set a more accurate EXPR. But will that screw other things up? Regards, -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
Re: In-Reply-To colors
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: > At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with: > > Hi, everybody. > > Hallo :-) > > > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've > > written. This is what I've got now: > > > folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'" > > Try this: > > folder-hook . "color index green black ~P" > > The drawback is, that all mails from you get colored, not only your replys. Ah, yeah, I know. See, I also have this in my config :-): folder-hook . "color index brightgreen black '~P'" (Both lines copied from Sven) Regards, -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
In-Reply-To colors
Hi, everybody. I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've written. This is what I've got now: folder-hook . "color index green black '~h in-reply-to:.*acc.umu.se'" This works. It's just that it has one downside, for example if a mailinglist has several people from *acc.umu.se alot of "wrong" mails get colored. So basically what I'm wondering is that if there is some way to get mutt to do "the right thing"? Regards, Johan Svedberg -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle
$mail_check and $timeout
Hi, all. Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent? Regards, Johan Svedberg
$mail_check and $timeout
Hi, all. Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent? Regards, Johan Svedberg
Multiple coloring
Hi, all. I'm a little unsure of how to formulate this question so please poke on me if you don't understand. :) If I for example have this in my .muttrc: color index blue black "~D" color index brightyellow black "~f winkle ~p" I would like all the mail I mark for deletion to be colored the same way, so my question is this: Is it possible to set some kind of priority for which color mutt should use in case a mail has both of these "conditions"? Regards, Johan Svedberg -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber |E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90-49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |S-905 96 Umeå |Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70-639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
Re: SOLVED vim startup
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:27:43PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]: > > By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"", > > I get the correct results! > > and whow is this different from "set editor=vi"? > now, that's a surprise. > > set editor="vi -u none" > set editor="/usr/bin/vi -u none" > > any difference there? Could be, depending on $PATH? Johan
Re: Outgoing messages folder
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:40:12PM -0500, David Rock wrote: > As usual, Sven came through with a tidbit that does exactly what you > want: > > fcc-save-hook . =Outgoing/%O > > This will save a copy to your outgoing folder and the %O represents: > (_O_riginal save folder) Where mutt would formerly have stashed > the message: list name or recipient name if no list > > So in order for this to work properly (have %O represent what you want) > you need to have these three things in your muttrc: > > set force_name=yes > set save_name=yes (or set save_address=yes if you want the full address) > fcc-save-hook . =Outgoing/%O > > I found this by accident in Sven's "ToDo" list toward the bottom of this > page: > http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html > > Where you can find info on the format strings is in section: > 6.3.83. index_format Ah, many thanks, both to you and Sven. :-) Regards, Johan Svedberg
Re: PipeRead help
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:23:09PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Hi, all. > > I need some help. What I want to do is check if a program is on my > system, and if it is I want to run it in my InitFunction. I'm guessing > this could be done in a Function using PipeRead, but I have no idea how > to do it... :-) Help would be greatly appriciated. > > Regards, Johan Svedberg > > -- > |Mail address |Home telephonenumber |E-mail address | > |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 - 49 139 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| > |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | > |S-905 96 Umeå |Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | > |Sweden |+46 (0)70 - 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| > -- Shit, this went to the wrong list.
PipeRead help
Hi, all. I need some help. What I want to do is check if a program is on my system, and if it is I want to run it in my InitFunction. I'm guessing this could be done in a Function using PipeRead, but I have no idea how to do it... :-) Help would be greatly appriciated. Regards, Johan Svedberg -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 - 49 139 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |S-905 96 Umeå |Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70 - 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
File browser statusbar
Hi. Where do I change the stuff displayed in the file browsers statusbar? Johan Svedberg
askcc default
Hi, all. Hmmm, according to 'man muttrc' the default for the askcc configuration variable is "no". this doesn't seem to be correct? Johan Svedberg -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 - 49 139 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |S-905 96 Umeå |Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70 - 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
Auto sync-mailbox
Hi! I was just wondering if mutt have some options for autorunning sync-mailbox ($)? -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |905 96 Umeå|Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
"Two word" alias
Hi! I was just wondering if it's possible to have "two word" aliases? Like alias foo bar John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? Using "" doesn't seem to do it either, any ideas? /winkle -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber |E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |905 96 Umeå|Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
Replying without "modifying"
Hi! I was just wondering if there is some configuration in mutt that makes it possible for you to reply to a message without actually "modifying" the original message (used when confirming mailinglists subscriptions), all I get now is just "Aborted unmodified message.". If there isn't, this might be something to implement? Thanks. /winkle -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| | |905 96 Umeå|Cellular telephonenumber|WWW address | |Sweden |+46 (0)70 639 49 82 |http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle| --
