Re: strange 1.3.22 to 1.3.22.1 compile problem
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:55:48PM +0200 or thereabouts, Thomas Roessler wrote: The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did), there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1. so it means that my copy of 1.3.22i doesn't need the patch unlike the others i noticed who have patched to 1.3.22.1i? -- GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible to accomplish complex actions. --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards) PGP signature
strange 1.3.22 to 1.3.22.1 compile problem
hi. i'm trying to apply the diff file for 1.3.22 to 1.3.22.1 and i find it strange how it works. first, i have to run ./configure before i can apply the patch. second, after applying the patch i have to somehow create a file name README.UPGRADE as the compilation is looking for that file. without it the compile will fail. third, after step two i keep getting this error messages in the po/ directory: PATH=../src:$PATH : --default-domain=mutt --directory=.. \ --directory=.. --add-comments --keyword=_ --keyword=N_ \ --files-from=./POTFILES.in \ test ! -f mutt.po \ || ( rm -f ./mutt.pot \ mv mutt.po ./mutt.pot ) file=./`echo uk | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ rm -f $file PATH=../src:$PATH -o $file uk.po /bin/sh: -o: command not found make[2]: *** [uk.gmo] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/backup/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.22/po' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/backup/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.22' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 although this missing files are present before i run make. i wouldn't normally have problems compiling if i don't apply the patch. i hate to download the whole mutt-1.3.22 tarball again as i'm on a slow dial-up line. is there anything i can fix to make the patch compile? -- GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible to accomplish complex actions. --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards) PGP signature
Re: GnuPG and accented characters
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:19:22AM +0200 or thereabouts, Ren? Clerc wrote: Hi everyone, since we're talking about gpg anyway, perhaps I may find the answer to my problem here. as you can learn from my .signature, my name contains an e-accent-aigu. When I generate my key, with this character in it, everything's fine, but when I publish my key to the keyserver, it ends up like: Ren?? Clerc I used the both iso-8859-1 and iso-8859-2 for the --charset option, but this doesn't help. Does anybody know how to handle this problem? Is there another way of escaping this character in the gpg prompts? Or should I change some TERM setting or so? (mine is 'screen' right now)... Or should I just change my name? (sigh...) All the help is appreciated! hi. i found your mail in mutt-users mailing list and i'm having problem displaying accented characters in mutt. like your name it is appearing as Ren??. have you found the solution yet? -- GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible to accomplish complex actions. --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards) PGP signature
Re: newbie question; how to define an outbox
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:16:42PM -0400 or thereabouts, Stefan Antoni wrote: I am a one-week-newbie in using mutt and i want to save my outgoing mail in an outbox like i can do it with KMail and other known email-clients. How do i create such an outbox and tell mutt to dump outgoing mail automatically into it. finally, i'd like to have something like that in my /home/myname : mbox.in -- already created for incomming mail. mbox.out -- the mailbox for outgoing mail. for mbox.out you need to set the record variable in ~/.muttrc like this: set record=~/Mail/mbox.out while incoming mails can be taken care of by procmail regardless of mta you are using: MAILDIR=/home/rino/Mail DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/mbox.in :0 * ^Return-path:.*mutt-users.*@mutt\.org * $DEFAULT there are many things you can do with procmail such as keeping separate mailboxes for incoming mails depending on which they came from. my original recipe is like this: MAILDIR=/home/rino/Mail # this one stores my mail in ~/Mail so that i don't have to create a symlink # from /var/mail/user DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/inbox/ # i use a Maildir type mailbox that's why i have a trailing / :0 * ^Return-path:.*debian-user.*@lists\.debian\.org * $MAILDIR/debian-user/ :0 * ^Return-path:.*mutt-users.*@mutt\.org * $MAILDIR/mutt-users/ hth. -- GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible to accomplish complex actions. --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards) PGP signature
Re: How to *not* include myself in the reply message?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 04:26:34PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jun Sun wrote: Hmm, first I did not change 'metoo'. Secondly even if I explicitly set 'metoo' to no, I still see my address included in group reply. I think it might has to do with my folder setting. I have set up such that in different folders I have different From: address. Perhaps mutt does not recognize those additional From: addresses as me, and consequently include them in the group reply. Is there anyway to tell mutt what addresses are considered me so that it won't include any of them when I hit g group reply? Or is there way to mutt respect the current From: and regard it as me ? from TFM look for alternates. -- Waiting for the Stinky Pete release of Debian _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Problem with outlook pgp patch lotus notes
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0400 or thereabouts, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote: I've applied the outlook pgp patch to mutt v1.2.5. Everything is great, but my boss, who uses Lotus Notes :-( has complained that my messages show up as msg.pgp attachments! Looking at the headers of sent messages, they look normal (pgp stuff in msg body, etc.), except for the following header: Content-Disposition: inline; filename=msg.pgp I don't think this header is needed since the messages I sent are now text/plain. How do you guys recommend I fix this? Edit the outlook pgp patch? I haven't done any C in something like 10 years... are you sending within your notes network or from the internet? if it's from outside your notes network you could just tell your domino mail server to use plain text for incoming messages. -- Waiting for the Stinky Pete release of Debian PGP signature
Re: Address Book for Vim?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:13:39AM -0700 or thereabouts, Ryan Allen wrote: Hi, I'm just curious what people are using for an address book application if anything at all?? I use vim as my editor for mutt, and would like to know if there are any applications avaliable that work well with mutt and vim. Curses based would be great, much like pine uses. What are people using out there, and how are they set up? Cut and Paste is only efficient for so long there's no separate address book application or an application itself. mutt uses can use any text file you've set as your alias. I have mine set as source ~/.mutt/alias in my ~/.muttrc and the format of the alias file is: alias mutt Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] so whenever i type mutt in the To: field it gets expanded to the real email address. just like an address book application! :-) you can also add entries to it using your favorite text editor and just following the same format or while viewing an email just hit the a key to add an alias. hth and my 2cents. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: New mail 'N' flag not showing up
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:00:17PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote: * Rino Mardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Fri-01 19:56 -0700]: On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote: [ ..snip.. ] have you checked the set mark_old in your ~/.muttrc ? i have 1.3.22i and don't experience the problem you're having. yeah, i have the following line in my file: unset mark_old further, i think it said in teh docs that it does not matter for 'mbox' mailboxes do you also use 'mbox', or mh/maildir stuff? i use maildir. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: reply defaults
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:14:48AM -0400 or thereabouts, melissa ion kibbe wrote: Hello, I am having difficulty finding the documentation on how to edit the 'reply description', in which the mailer prints out something to the effect of on such-and-such a date so-and-so wrote -- I would like to change the default on this, and I am pretty sure it is possible, but I am having difficulty finding documentation on it. I would appreciate any help. Please cc me as I am not subscribed to the list as of this writing. thanks in advance, melissa. melissa, what you're looking for is attribution which you can find in your ~/.muttrc file: # set attribution=On %d, %n wrote: # # # # # # Name: attribution # # # Type: string # # # Default: On %d, %n wrote: # # # # # # # # # This is the string that will precede a message which has been # # included # # # in a reply. For a full listing of defined escape sequences see # # the # # # section on ``index_format''. # # # -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
inline GnuPG signature
hi. i noticed that on going out my gpg signed emails are sent as another mime attachments which could be annoying to users who have gui mua's. how can i setup mutt so that gpg signs all appear together with the body of the message? thanks. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: New mail 'N' flag not showing up
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote: dont really like replying to my own posts, but just more info, in case someone cares. it looks like the problem is still there in 1.3.22i also, it looks like it works fine, until i quit mutt. if i quit mutt, and then come back, i dont get the 'new mail' indicator. this could, i suppose, be expected behavior ... have you checked the set mark_old in your ~/.muttrc ? i have 1.3.22i and don't experience the problem you're having. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: inline GnuPG signature
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote: hi Pumbaa, set pgp_create_traditional=yes from the man page: pgp_create_traditional Type: quadoption Default: no This option controls whether Mutt generates old- style PGP encrypted or signed messages under cer? tain circumstances. Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have a character set different from us-ascii, or which consist of more than a single MIME part. Also note that using the old-style PGP message for? mat is strongly deprecated. some other pgp questions, mutt (1.2.5i) does a wonderful job of automatically verifying MIME/pgp signed messages. However it does not automatically verify inline pgp messages, unless i pipe them to gpg --verify. is there a better way (i checked my docs but have not yet searched the list archives)? hehe. if it's strongly deprecated i'd rather stay with what the default settings of mutt. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: mutt a2ps
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:51:53PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Selig wrote: Hello! I would like to use a2ps as my print_command. There is only one little problem i have: how can i give the from-field to it. set print_command=a2ps --center-title\Mail from %f\ doesnt work. Thanks Andy -- _ / \ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign XAgainst HTML Mail / \ Don't diet. Download a virus to remove FAT lol. love your signature. just a note, set your editor to wrap at either column 72 or 79. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: easy question... :)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 05:31:58PM +0200 or thereabouts, Matthias LOITSCH wrote: it's just an easy thing i'd like to know : how can i filter my messages so that, for example, all mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] get into a specific mailbox when they arrive? you need procmail for that. in my ~/.procmailrc i have something like this: :0: * ^Return-path:.*mutt-user.*@mutt\.org $MAILDIR/mutt/ so what this does is place all mails that comes from this list to ~/Mail/mutt. and the same syntax goes for the other mailing list i subscribe to. now in you ~/.muttrc you tell mutt what your mailboxes are by using the mailboxes keyword like mailboxes ! ~/Mail/mutt and so on. that way when you press the key c it will move to those directories where there is new mail. hth. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
OT: replace POP3 with IMAP directly
hi. a little OT here i'm wondering what are the requirements to replace POP3 with IMAP? in my fetchmail i download emails using POP3. now i've learned that IMAP doesn't require the user to do POP-before-SMTP hence with that i don't have to check for emails before being able to send out emails. is this just a straight-forward replace of the keyword? thanks. -- In is out and out is in. But out is out and in is in. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: mutt finding mailboxes problem
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 07:19:32PM +0200 or thereabouts, Cliff Sarginson wrote: Hello, A problem. My users mailboxes are in ~/Mail, as per default. However if i do a c to change mailbox folder mutt does not find it unless I am either in ~/Mail or I type in ~/Mail/folder. However if I use ? to see the list of mail folders, it shows them in ~/Mail without a problem. I think my enviornment etc is ok. Is there some setting I am missing ? Thanks -- have you defined in your ~/.muttrc or /etc/Muttc what mailboxes you are using? hard to help someone with no information about the configs. -- In is out and out is in. But in is in and out is out. -- Pumbaa PGP signature
mutt-1.3.2i corrupt?
hi. i'm using debian 2.2r0 and have downloaded mutt-1.3.2i from ftp.mutt.org. i have gnupg-1.0.5 installed which is currently being used by mutt-1.2.5i without any problems. mutt-1.3.2i produces errors when doing make install and it's searching for the file README.UPGRADE at the top-level directory where i'm compiling mutt. i got around this by copying my current README.UPGRADE file from my /usr/local/doc/mutt directory. when installed, mutt-1.3.2i would not recognize my settings in ~/.mutt/gpg.rc although mutt-1.2.5i does. the problem setting is set pgp_sign_micalg=sha1. lastly, the diff file diff-1.3.2i-1.3.2.1i.gz produces a lot of reject files everywhere. but this one i can live without. it's the first two problems that bothers me. is the file in the ftp server corrupt or my file? i hate to download it again as it took me almost an hour to get. please cc: me on the replies as i'm not on the list. thank you. -- In is in, out is out; but out is out, and in is in - Pumbaa PGP signature
Re: GnuPG autosign how
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:10:11AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote: % % gnupg: [options] % % at the bottom of the screen after giving my passphrase and it won't be sent % unless I disable "sign". Aha -- this sounds like there is a problem with your gpg invocation. Would you care to post your gpg.rc file and/or relevant sections of muttrc for review? gpg.rc? i only have ~/.gnupg with my keys in them -- Who's watching the watchmen? Key fingerprint = E619 726E 3815 7A48 EAC7 E49F DF93 4E33 B069 0883
GNUpg repost
Sorry folks I'm reposting since my recipe dunk all my emails to /dev/null. doh. My question is how to make GNUPG (1.0.1-2) and mutt (1.0.1-9) sign all my emails automagically. At present if I manually make it sign an email it would ask for the passphrase, and then would puke and give me: gpg: [options] without doing anything. What am I missing here? -- Who's watching the watchmen? Key fingerprint = E619 726E 3815 7A48 EAC7 E49F DF93 4E33 B069 0883
Re: mailing lists support
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:52:13PM -0700 or thereabouts, Mike Erickson wrote: Also, is there a way to get 'r' (reply) to automatically list-reply if the message is from a mailing list? Since I switched back to mutt from PINE (couldn't live w/o message threading any longer), I have been sending personal replies to people on mailing lists inadverantly. Whoops. TIA, Mike just hit shift-L -- Who's watching the watchmen? Key fingerprint = E619 726E 3815 7A48 EAC7 E49F DF93 4E33 B069 0883
GnuPG autosign how
Hi. I have mutt 1.0.1-9 and GnuPG 1.0.1-2 installed in my Debian 2.2 box. I've looked at all the FAQs and I can't seem to figure out how to do "pgp_autosign" for all outgoing emails. All I get is: gnupg: [options] at the bottom of the screen after giving my passphrase and it won't be sent unless I disable "sign". What am I missing here? -- Who's watching the watchmen? Key fingerprint = E619 726E 3815 7A48 EAC7 E49F DF93 4E33 B069 0883
Re: Help on save-hook please
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 03:36:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Richard Curnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Is mbox-hook what you're after? Yes, that's what I meant. I thought I *knew* there was a way to do it, just forgot what it was. Then got confused by the $mbox explanation which doesn't talk about mbox-hook at all.. Oops again? :-) Okay if you read my reply to your first reply I've already discovered, and using, the mbox-hook to save read messages. Thought I'd let you know.
Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:45:07AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote: Not particularly; I just want to help out the faq project to get some quick answers for folks and unclutter the list. Unclutter the list? Would a different mailing list addy help? IN FreeBSD they have a freebsd-newbies and freebsd-hackers mailing list which I think this list needs. mutt-newbies and mutt-hackers What you'd all think about it?
Re: default mbox for cc'd messages
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 03:26:37AM -0700 or thereabouts, Eugene Lee wrote: When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might work: set record=. Mutt does send the message, but it does not generate a carbon copy in the current mailbox. Is there a way to do this? Or do I just have to manually specify the current mailbox? -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is best suited for procmail. Lemme dig up my recipe here somewhere...
Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 03:40:27PM +0530 or thereabouts, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Ditto with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and such. But why do you want to fragment the list? A better way is to introduce list topics, and have people subscribed only to specific topics. Listserv supports it (and majordomo 2 as well, iirc) I'm not familiar with list topics. Sounds the same to me. Care to elaborate?
Help on save-hook please
Hi. I've been running mutt for several days now and also managed to setup my own procmail recipes. My problem is with the the save-hook as I want to be able to save read messages to, let's say, a "Mail\read.mutt" file. This is my present ~/.muttrc contents for the save-hook: folder-hook . set sort=threads folder-hook /var/mail/rino set sort=date-received folder-hook =sent set sort=date-sent folder-hook . save-hook * =received folder-hook IN.misc save-hook * =obsd folder-hook IN.ipfilter save-hook * =ipf folder-hook IN.mutt-users save-hook * =mutters I have "~/Mail/IN.misc", "~/Mail/IN.ipfilter", "~/Mail/IN.mutt-users" for my other mailboxes which I can read using "mutt -f". I have gone and checked the FAQs, Nancy's, and the mini-FAQ (bronto-FAQ now) and couldn't find a clue why read messages still reside in my ~/Mail/IN.mutt file or any other mailboxes. For normal mail that arrives in /var/mail/rino they get saved in "~/Mail/received" without problems but not any other messages from my other mailboxes.
Re: Help on save-hook please
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 11:33:33PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote: snipped... folder-hook . save-hook * =received The * should be a . instead, like this: folder-hook . save-hook . =received Hmm, that could be the reason why I'm getting a repetition operand invalid. But if you want automatic saving of read messages, what you're looking for is in fact: folder-hook . set record='+read.mutt' But this is assuming I am only subscribed mutt-users right? So all mails go to "read.mutt" because of that "." in folder-hook. The + character is a shortcut to your $folder dir, which by default is ~/Mail. Alternatively you could also use = instead of +, but in the above it would be confusing. :-) Hope this helps, Mikko Yes the "+" part as I've already fixed my problem using mbox-hook for each of my mailing lists. Either I need new reading glasses or more sleep as I wasn't able to find what that "+" means up to now. Thank you for responding.
